How come there is no publishing authority on the internet?

Question

'''Locked by a moderator with input from an admin. This is a Firefox Support forum, not a place to vent. Please find another forum to post this in.
I can go to millions of sites that have illegal and offensive content on the internet.
I feel betrayed as someone who has spent thousands of dollars on a computer and 1000s of hours working on my computer and browsing the internet because there does not exist security measures to keep dangerous content and people from providing content that I would otherwise object to on my computer.
Thus I do not understand why companies like microsoft who hold a huge share of computer industry do not take responsibility for the safety of its customers. Like wise I am sceptical of companies like google who claim to be a reputable company/corporation however they index and provide links to all these illegal sites I am talking about.
I am aware of the existence of content filters however I don't believe that having to pay for my security after I have shelled out thousands of dollars for a computer supposedly to be an expression of modern technology that does not have the capacity to maintain decency and appropriateness.
If websites were to be subject to censorship it would make the internet more useful and ultimately safe - it would be a simple task to employ a team of people to maintain a database of active websites and to review and censor material based on its content. This would make the internet much more viable as a universal tool for modern day business and communication because illegal and deviant material would not be able to be accessed beyond the regulations that need to be developed.
Google is a perfect example of indexing gone wrong - there is no censorship - any review of websites is pointless because you can toggle access easily through the browser. I believe that internet browsers should be regulated to censor the material accessed. I believe as a user that I have the right not to be subjected to the abuses of evil and degenerate people on the internet. I finally conclude that access to such disgusting content should be available through hacking out a programs default security and voiding of rights of that user to any protection from dangerous material.
I believe the internet should be censored because there is so much non-constructive material on the internet and it serves as a distraction and detriment to a person's well being.
A user has the right to their own security and dignity - such development would be worthwhile because it will help to save countless people who would otherwise have to go through disturbing experineces such as I have with internet browsers...
Thanks for your time :)
indexing and publishing !!!

Answer 1

How is that related to Firefox support?
Sorry, this is not a forum for entertaining a discussion of what is and isn't right about the internet. The tools for blocking objectionable content are out there, it is up to the individual user to use those tools, or not. Bottom line is freedom of choice, and this country defends that for all citizens - pervs included.