How to add criteria in vendor evaluation

Hi friends,
For vandor evaluation , I wants to add 'Criteria' how can i add it.
Regards,
Mahesh.

Hi Mahesh,
Vendor Evaluation comes with the standard main criterions Price,Quality,Delivery and Services and Sub criterias.
It's possible to add the criteria through config.
Regards,
Bijoy Kumar S.P.

Similar Messages

  • Additional sub criteria for Vendor Evaluation tab in SES (ML81N).

    Hi,
    I like to add two additional sub criteria for Vendor Evaluation tab in SES (ML81N). Based on which vendor evaluation will be calculated.
    1. Safety/Envt Upkeep
    2. Morale
    These two are added in SPRO->Purchasing->Vendor Evaluation ->Define Criteria. But not displayed in ML81N->Vendor Evaluation tab.
    Existing criteria. 1) Quality of Service and  2) Service Timeliness are already available.
    Thanks in advance.
    Chetan Shah

    Hello Chetan,
    have you checked note 79166 "MM-SRV Hint: Vendor evaluation for service"?
    Define an evaluation criterion for services in Customizing of the vendor evaluation to be able to use the vendor evaluation also for the services management.The main criterion must contain the determination methods 'C' (determination from the quality valuation of the service) and 'D' (determination from the timeliness rating of the service) in the sub-criteria.
    Kind Regards
    TomT

  • Automatic criteria in Vendor evaluation

    Can anybody tell me what is difference between automatic criteria and semi automatic creteria in vendor evaluation? can anyone explain me automatic criteria with some example?
    Thanks and regards
    sriram

    hi sriram
    vendor evaluation can be done
    main criteria score from sub criteria
         sub criteria
               each sub criteria scores will be cal based
                    1.maual
                    2.semi auto
                    3.automatic
    if auto means u need to define points score for each sub criteria.once u define criteria for scoring based on that system automatically allot score for each sub criteria
    if semi auto means u need to enter score manually at inforecord level for each  subcriteria for each operation u do in purchasing.Here u r not defigning criteria for alloting score to sub criteria u need to enter manually for each operation.
    ok
    can u understand that
    if ok assign points me
    nani

  • How to add criteria to a Prompt?

    Wondering if anyone here knows of a way to limit what can be entered into an Edit Box Prompt? We have a prompt that sets a presentation variable, that then is used as a filter on the report. To limit what comes back, we would like to only allow the user to enter in a length of > 4 into the prompt (XXX%). So far have tried setting in at variable, at the prompt and in the report filters themselves to no avail? Anyone know of a way or if it is even possible?
    Any help is greatly appreciated.

    There is no out of box limit as such on "Edit Box".
    I cant think of any other solution except Java script.
    If you have web services team in your company, they can be great resource to help on this topic.
    -Vinay

  • Vendor evaluation using Invoice criteria

    Hi SAP gurus,
    I want to know if anybody has used de Invoice criteria in Vendor Evaluation, that is available in ERP 2005.
    The subcriterias Price Variance and Quantity Variance are automatic?
    Can we use them only with MM Module or do we need the SRM functionalities?
    Thanks in advance.
    Best Regards,
    SN

    Hi
    In invoice main criteria we have
          -  Quantity variance
          - Price variance
    Quantity Variance
    With this criterion, you evaluate how exactly the quantity to be invoiced agrees with the quantity actually invoiced.
    Price Variance
    With this criterion, you evaluate how exactly the price to be invoiced agrees with the price actually invoiced.
    In order for evaluation results for the two last-mentioned subcriteria to be generated automatically, you must activate invoice evaluation for the company code. In the process, you also define the maximum points score per company code.
    You can refer the documentation
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
    Thanks !
    E.Avudaiappan

  • Weight Key in Vendor Evaluation

    Hi all,
    How the Weighting  key in Vendor Evaluation is updating for Each Vendor?
    If it is automatically Updating why ME6E is required?
    regardds
    Gibi Philip

    hi,
    Weighting Keys
    A weighting key is an identifier under which the weighting factors for a number of main criteria can be grouped together and saved.
    If you know that you will want to carry out an evaluation repeatedly with certain main criteria and certain weighting factors, you can save this combination under a weighting key.
    When you carry out the next vendor evaluation, just enter the relevant weighting key instead of entering a weighting factor for each individual criterion. The system then automatically sets all the weighting factors.
    There are two possible types of weighting key in the standard system:
    Key 01
    Key 02
    Key 01 permits the equal weighting of all criteria.
    Key 02 enables you to evaluate vendors supplying small parts, for example.
    The weighting factors under this key are distributed as follows:
    Price 5
    Quality 3
    Delivery 2
    Gen. service/support 1
    External service provision 2
    Hope it explains you the importance ...
    Regards
    Priyanka.P
    AWARD IF HELPFULL

  • Score system in vendor evaluation

    Hi,
    Please explain how scoring system works in vendor evaluation for criteria Delivery and sub criterias on time delivery and qty reliability.
    Thanks in advance!
    Regards,
    Jana

    Please check these answered links:
    Vendor Evaluation  Score ..
    Vendor Evaluation  Score ...???
    Vendor Evaluation-Delivery Score
    Edited by: Afshad Irani on Apr 21, 2010 1:58 PM

  • Vendor evaluation - score working

    Hi guys,
    Does any one have any write up /info on how the system arrives at the scores of criteria and sub criteria during vendor evaluation. I am looking for detailed info all all criteria s /subcriterias.
    Also let me know how i can change the  weighting percentage for various criteria s.
    rgds

    Hi,
    Refer following links;
    [Subcriterion in Vendor Evaluation|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    [Fully Automatic Scoring|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    [Scoring Methods for Subcriteria|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    [Calculating Overall Score/Scores for Main Criteria|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]

  • Vendor evaluation in purchase order (vendor unknown)

    Hi!
    I created 2 new evaluation criteria for vendor evaluation.
    When i go to tcode ME25 "create PO vendor unknown", I assign the source of suplly and click on "vendor evaluation" my 2 new criterias do not appear in the "Ranking list of vendors".
    Any ideas?
    Regards.

    I think the new vendor is having a different pricing schema than the old vendor. Check the pricing schema for the old vendor (in purchasing view in field 'Schema Group. vendor) and compare it to the new vendor. I think they're different.
    If it is then what i think happening is the user already input the price for the condition type in pricing schema A, then the vendor is changed and the new pricing schema is kiciking in thus making the old condition type missing.
    Try to either:
    A. Change to the old vendor back,
    B. Change the pricing schema of the new vendor to be the same with old vendor

  • Vendor evaluation cube ?

    Hello ,
    I was just going through business content cube for vendor evaluation and i could see mutipple cube with same name in convention .
    Could you please let me know which one is the latest one and how to determine it ?
    Vendor Evaluation  Technical name: 0PUR_C02
    Vendor Evaluation Data   Technical name: 0PUR_C05
    Vendor Evaluation Data (Semi-Automatic)  Technical name: 0PUR_C06
    Subsequent Settlement u2013 Evaluation   Technical Name: 0PUR_C03
    Which one should i active ?
    Regards

    Hi,
    It depends on your reuirement for Vendor analysis, and you need to activate all/some  of them.
    For example ; you can take some of the infoobjects like
    0PUR_C02 - Vendor information, material, purches org, plant and some score fields as key figure
    0PUR_C05- Overall score , score on time basic , delivery basic etc.. and create a generic datasource for the  above required fields and pull the data from R/3 to BW.
    Also pls chk this link;
    Re: Vendor evaluation infosource
    Regards
    CSM Reddy

  • How to induct Quality criteria in to already existing Vendor Evaluation ?

    Hi
    My Client has configured all the Vendor Evaluation structure. But Quality is not maintained in that structure. Now,
    1. How can we induct Quality in to the Vendor Evaluation without disturbing the other main criteria in it ?
    2. Will there be sudden impact on the other areas in the system ?
    3. Should the Quality management be activated for the materials if they are to be considered in to this Vendor Evalution. ?
    Thanks
    Maruthi

    1. How can we induct Quality in to the Vendor Evaluation without disturbing the other main criteria in it ?
    you can just activate the quality criteria (it is already exist in the system)
    2. Will there be sudden impact on the other areas in the system ?
    No
    3. Should the Quality management be activated for the materials if they are to be considered in to this Vendor Evalution. ?
    Yes if you want the system to be calculated automatically otherwise make the quality criteria as manual and enter the points when you run vensor evaluation.
    if you keep automatic than it will read from usage decision and to have that the QM should be active.

  • Reg: Vendor Evaluation - Criteria "Delivery"

    Hi Gurus,
    I am in process of vendor evaluation in system. Confguration is maintained and I am opting for Automatic vendor evaluation and our interest is in Price and delivery. When I am doing Vendor evaluation in ME61,
    I am getting the automatic values for Criteria "Delivery" and subcriteria  "Price Level" "Price Behavior".
    But incase of delivery I am not getting any values. I checked for settings in confirguration but not able to trace why the delivery vendor evaluation is not happening.
    Pls advice on this.
    Regards,
    Venu

    Hi
    There are some settings like minimum delivery percentage which needs to be fulfilled for calculating score with respect to delivery performance.
    Check the PDF from the link, it gives you more details on how score is been calculated for each criteria and customizing settings
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
    Regards
    Raja

  • Vendor Evaluation With Non Standard Main and Sub Criteria

    Hi Gurus
    I have a requirement wherein I  have to evaluate a vendor on non stanadard Main Criterias like
    1. Productivity  with sub criteria as Receipt / Excepected Yield, for which I have used Scoring method 2
    2.Quality Standards with Sub Criteria,- Germination (%),Genitic Purity % , Field level flags, for which i have used scoring method 7 by activating user exit- MM06L001
    3.Raw Seed to Clean Seed ratio, with the same sub criteria and with the above scoring method and user exit.
    The weightages given to the above three are 40 , 35 and  25 respectively.
    Can you please tell me how to calculate the values for subcriterias( for example for my main criteria 2. i want to assign the weightaghes for sub criterias - Germination - 50 , Genitic Purity %- 30, & Field level flags - 20, . along with smoothin factors.
    I want to automise the whole process and run the evaluation in the background.
    An early reply will be very helpful to me.
    thanks and regards
    Ashok Kumar Pitla

    T147   - Control table for vendor evaluation
    T147A - Definition for main criteria
    T147B - Text for main criteria
    T147C - Definition for sub-criteria
    T147D - Text for sub-criteria
    T147E - Definition of weighting keys
    T147F - Description of weighting keys
    T147G - Main criteria
    T147H - Interval for delivery time statistics
    T147I - Definition of sub-criteria for the main criteria
    T147J - Weighting keys
    T147K - Assignment: Percentage X Score
    T147L - Intervals for quantity reliability
    T147M - Definition of scope of list
    T147N - Text for scope of list
    T147O - Scope of List
    T027A - is the table for defining shipping instructions
    T027C - specifies the points scores for compliance

  • Vendor evaluation criteria rejects/complaints

    Hi,
        I have configured the vendor evaluation to look at the rejection/complaints sub criteria with the scoring method as 8 = Automatic Determ. from Quality Stat.: Quality Notification. The first time I create a notification, the score drops from 100 straight to 1. Then later no matter how many notifications I create and close with external or internal origin, the score remains at 1. How do I change the score ?
    Also is it mandatory to use the Q2/F2 notifications types for vendor evaluation.? What if I create my own Z notification type with origin Q2 ? Will vendor eval still work ?
    Thanks

    Hi Shailendra,
                        I am aware of all these settings and have gone thru your document as well. However if you read my post carefully you will see what I am actually asking.
    "I have configured the vendor evaluation to look at the rejection/complaints sub criteria with the scoring method as 8 = Automatic Determ. from Quality Stat.: Quality Notification. The first time I create a notification, the score drops from 100 straight to 1. Then later no matter how many notifications I create and close with external or internal origin, the score remains at 1. How do I change the score ? "
    My question is...how do I show all the notificaitons of type external origin when I run my ME63 report ? Right now no matter how many notifications I create and assign the the external origin, they dont show up in ME63.
    Thanks

  • Vendor Evaluation- Points for Automatic criteria

    Dear Team,
    Our requirement for ontime delivery criteria is - for delays up to 10 days from PO delivery date to GR date 100 points, 11- 15 days delay -98 points,16-30 delay -95,31-45 delay-93,46-60 delay -90 , >60 - 1 point. how to configure this points in SPRO -points for the auto matic criteria.
    Also what is the logic taken for assigning point scores for standard purchase organisation available in SAP 0001(Einkaufsorg. 0001). IF WE ARE TAKING A COPY OF THIS AND TRYING TO EDIT, SOME VALUES ARE NOT GETTING DELETED & SOME VALUES NOT GETTING SAVED.
    Thanks & Regards
    Nireesh

    Hi,
    Vendor Evaluation (t-code ME61) has the following features:
    Wighting Key: in Std. SAP two keys are given (with equal weighting & unequal weighting). Based on the criteria you have, you can either accept & follow one of these std. settings or create one for yourself in IMG.
    Suppose you select equal weighting as the key to be followed: there are 4 criteria viz. Price, Quality, Delivery and Service.
    Each of these criteria have sub-criteria for them. For Ex. Price has 3 sub-criteria: Price level, Price history and Price behaviour.
    So, for each sub-criterion, you allocate different marks (based on your business). Again, for each sub-criterion, there is a scoring method in Std. SAP. You can't create any new scoring method of your own. You only have to follow one of the 16 scoring methods given.
    Thus, the total score would come to 100 and you get vendor evaluation based on these criteria chosen.
    In your case: you have descending marks (points) for delay in delivery. So, pl. make one according to those criteria & sub-criteria. Please go through the help.notes and also some links in SCN. Regards, KrishnaM

Maybe you are looking for