How to stop a while loop with long delay

Hi everyone,
I am building a simple program for turning on and off a single Bit.  The task is to turn ON the Bit for a period length T1, and OFF the Bit for a period length T2. T1 is normally different from T2, and can be controlled  by users. 
Since T1 and T2 can be variable, they sometimes can be very long.
If I use a Wait function inside a While loop, it needs long delay to be able to Stop the Main program.
The same situation happens when I use Timed loop.
Can anyone suggest me how to do this task?
Thanks a lot. 
Message Edited by tatuan on 04-12-2010 12:56 AM

Here's another possibility using OpenG Wait ms:
Free Code Capture Tool! Version 2.1.3 with comments, web-upload, back-save and snippets!
Nederlandse LabVIEW user groep
My LabVIEW Ideas
LabVIEW, programming like it should be!

Similar Messages

  • How to stop a while loop in LabVIEW from a C program

    How to stop  a while loop in LabVIEW from a C code

    I think by creating dll you can stop the while loop from your C program.For that you just create dll (Dynamic Link Library) for the VI which has that while loop.
         Anyway can u please explain ur requirement clearly.

  • How to stop a while loop after certain time using Elapsed time vi

    how to stop a while loop after certain time using Elapsed time vi.

    Hi Frankie,
    Just place the Elapsed Time VI inside the WHILE loop, and wire the 'Time Has Elapsed' output to the conditional terminal in the lower right corner (which should be set to 'stop if true' by default).
    In the future, please post your LabVIEW questions to the LabVIEW Forum.  You have a much better chance of getting your questions answered sooner, and those answers can then help others who are searching the LabVIEW forums.  Thanks!
    Justin M
    National Instruments

  • Code golf: stop two while loops with guaranteed iteration ratio

    In the vein of the Perl tradition, I'd like to see if there's any interest in solving short programming puzzles in LabVIEW. Anyone can post a problem and define the rules for solving it.
    Here's a beginning/intermediate question to whet your "palette".
    With one user-action, how would you stop two while loops such that the ratio of their iterations is the always the same? One concrete way to visualize this situation is in taking measurements: two instruments use the same timing source to take measurements, but second divides the clock down so that it is an integer factor slower than the first. For example, if the slower instrument is four times slower, then at the end of the VI, if the slower instrument takes 100 measurements, the faster instrument has taken 400.
    You may only use vi.lib
    You cannot include any other subVIs
    Your solution must pass for loop1 interval as low as 25 ms
    Template (attached in LabVIEW 2009)
    If folks are interested in this, then let's figure out how to make future problems better. Please post your suggestions and critiques, but only if you also post a submission ;-)
    Go to Solution.
    Multirate Loop Code ‏11 KB

    Norbert_B wrote:
    a) You work with an integer factor of speed. While this matches many application areas, there are still cases where the factor has to be floating point (e.g. 2.5). Additionally, the factor might "invert", so the master loop runs slower than the slave (factor 0.5 for instance).
    It sounds like you're about to post another code golf question. If you think the problem scope is too small, you're welcome to fashion one to your taste. Thanks for volunteering :-D
    Norbert_B wrote:
    b) This example does not take into account that the hardware has to be synchronized with more accuracy than the software supplies (PXI?). If hardware synchronization is required, there are two possible ways:
    - The factor can be included in the synchronization (using PLL for instance)
    - The factor has to be software implemented by data reduction for the task running at the lower pace.
    Hrm, maybe puzzles aren't really your thing after all. You are correct: I did not define every constraint that can lead to a provable best closed-form solution, but that does not prevent people from stating their assumptions and forming creative, well-reasoned, and still correct designs. I overlooked this reading of the description and neglected to add a statement that said solvers were free to add their own conditions. I will do so in the fugure :-)
    If we choose the first of your suggestions, the VI must still retrieve the data at different rates. You can dedicate a loop for each instrument to decouple any jitter and latency introduced by their connectivity or internal operation; this adds some margin of safety when there is thread and driver contention. You can also implement a single counting loop like altenbach and forego the multiloop complexity.
    Norbert_B wrote:
    c) You don't state anything about "what happens with the data". Is this time consuming? Does it introduce additional delay in loop iterations? Is it OK to have data loss?
    I don't know -- you decide, you disclose, and you solve :-)
    In my specific situation, the measurements are time consuming and do add delay (each data "sample" is 5-20 megabytes), none can be lost, and the data must be available for others to analyze later. In addition, the amount of data is saturating the hard disk throughput. If a particular write takes too long, the instrument driver may overwrite a yet unfetched sample, which is unacceptable. I did not add these details to the problem discripton becuase they don't impact the puzzle.
    I don't want to burden people with my situation and ask them to solve my problem: I want to encourage them to bring their intuition and experience to a discussion. This is the design process at its heart: understanding why and how constraints affect your decisions. If a person states the additional conditions they've assumed, readers can learn why, and more importantly, when a Notifier might be more desirable than an Occurance or a Queue more robust than a Data Value Reference.
    The best NI-published advice for stopping multiple while loops ( is laughable (and is the "solution" in my template).
    Would you care to re-approach and contribute to this puzzle? I suspect you have a lot to offer :-)

  • How to stop a while loop of event structure from a main vi

    sorry for my english
    I have to stop a subvi from my main vi, the subvi contains a while loop and an event structure so I need to stop this loop while directly from my main vi I have tried global variable but it did not work
    any help please or example !!!   
    Go to Solution.
    stop a while loop and event structure from main vi.png ‏16 KB

    IYED wrote:
    sorry for my english
    I have to stop a subvi from my main vi, the subvi contains a while loop and an event structure so I need to stop this loop while directly from my main vi I have tried global variable but it did not work
    any help please or example !!!   
    If this is an example of how your code looks, I'd clean it up before the developer who has to work on it next hits you over the head with his LabVIEW Style Book. 
    (Mid-Level minion.)
    My support system ensures that I don't look totally incompetent.
    Proud to say that I've progressed beyond knowing just enough to be dangerous. I now know enough to know that I have no clue about anything at all.

  • How to stop a while loop which contains a timed loop

    I'm a new hand to labview, and I'm using labviw 7.1, NOT 8.x.  I'm trying to do a measurement, in which the flow would look like the attached file (I have stipped all hardware related components to make it easy to read).  My questions are:
    1. In Loop 3, when the comparison (x>20.85) is true, Loop1, Loop2 and Loop3 are stopped, why it won't quit the while loop (I have wired it to  while loop stop)?
    2. When it is running, I click on stop button, why it won't stop?
    Attachments: ‏228 KB

    hwm wrote:
    2. When it is running, I click on stop button, why it won't stop?
    The stop button is read outside of the inner while loops.  So the inner while loops will continue to run until their stop conditions are met.
    hwm wrote:
    1. In Loop 3, when the comparison (x>20.85) is true, Loop1, Loop2 and Loop3 are stopped, why it won't quit the while loop (I have wired it to  while loop stop)?
    It seemed to me like it would, but sometimes it seemed like I had to set change the numeric value one more time before it would.  You have a very odd structure there by placing the event structre inside the while loop with the other loops.  I think you may be running into issues where events are getting queued up in the event structure, or race conditions between when the event structure might execute relative to the other loops.  It is all very odd and difficult to predict all the ways these structures might interact and relative timing.  Usually event structures would belong in their own parallel while loop.  I think you need to rethink exactly what you are trying to do here.  It probably isn't event necessary to use the stop timed structure functions.  A local variable or a notified to pass the "Stop status" from loop 3 to the other loops (or the separate event structure loop to the other 3) would probably be better.

  • Stopping a while loop with a button in cvi

    Hi people,
    I am a newbie with CVI but I have used LabView Heaps. The issue I have is I want to be able to use a toggle button or a command button to stop a while loop. I used GetCtrlVal on the toggle before the while loop. I then enter the while loop and then GetCtrlVal at the end to see if the button has been pressed. The issue I have is that once I enter the loop I am unable to press any buttons on the Panel. I would normally have put a delay in the loop but the issue is I am wanting to control a robot in "realtime", thus any delays in the program results in the robot moving further than what I wanted it to. Any ideas? If you have any suggestions that would be much appreciated thank you.

    This should be in the CVI group but...
    At the tail end of your while loop add a call to function ProcessDrawEvents():
    When your program executes in a callback function or in code that does not call RunUserInterface or GetUserEvent, LabWindows/CVI does not update the user interface. Functions that are overly time-consuming can "lock out" user interface updates. To allow LabWindows/CVI to process these updates, call ProcessDrawEvents.

  • How to stop a while loop when using tab control

    How do you use a tab contol to stop what is happening on one tab when you switch to another tab?  In the test example I attached, I have a while loop nested inside a case structure controlled by the tab control.  When I tab to page two the elapsed timer starts but when I switch to another tab it does not stop.  I can't come up with an easy way to stop or exit the while loop when I change tabs. 
    Thank you
    tab ‏24 KB

    I played with it a little more and came up with this fix.  This fixes it but is not tied to the changing tabs as I was looking for.  Is this just too many nested loops and a bad idea?
    tab control fix ‏26 KB

  • Stop dependant while loops with 1 button

    I am developing a utility that allows a user to configure up to 2 devices (both use same driver with a different board number), click initialize, which then brings up a file dialog and displays arrays for the data to be collected and some error messages for each measurement.  The user then clicks the Start/Stop button to begin collecting and logging data.  Currently i have a Wait(ms) block to allow the user to set often the measurement should be made.  Currently the Start/Stop button allows collection to be started, paused, and started again.  My problem is trying to have a master stop button that should stop all loops immediately when it is pressed.
    I tried using a global variable for the stop button, but the measurement and logging while loop doesnt stop until after the wait(ms) block times out.  Can anyone give suggestions.  If i need to restructure the VI into different loops, I can do that.  I just want to understand the right way to program something like this.
    The VIs are attached.  I removed the device specific measurement VI so that anyone can open the vis and run them to see how it works.
    Attachments: ‏112 KB ‏27 KB ‏5 KB

    Ok.  I had a chance to take a look at your code and I think you don't quite understand the concept of "dataflow".  Let me see if I can help.
    First of all...when I refer to your upper structure, I am referring to the first while loop, sequence structure, and subsequent while loops.  When I refer to your lower structure, I am referring to the while loop containing the event structure.  Just so we get our terminology straight.
    I believe that you are under the illusion that your upper structure contains three parallel while loops.  It does not.  It contains three SERIAL while loops.  There is dataflow dependency between the while loops.  The sequence structure requires data that is not available until the first while loop has finished executing, so the sequence structure cannot start executing until the first while loop has terminated.
    The second while loop requires inputs from the first frame of the sequence structure (which, by the way, you don't need and should get rid of...the sequence structure, I mean), so it cannot start executing until the first frame of the sequence structure has terminated.  The third while loop requires inputs from the second while, again, the third while loop cannot run until the second while loop has finished executing.
    Now, for your stop button.  You have that global stopping all three loops.  So here's what is happening in your program:
    Your program starts.  The first while loop executes in parallel with the loop which contains the event structure.
    At some point you press the "stop" button.  Both the first while loop and the loop containing the event structure finish executing.
    The first frame of your sequence structure executes.
    The second frame of your sequence structure executes.  The second while loop reads the "stop" value from the global, so it executes once and then finishes.
    The third while loop starts executing.  Again, the loop reads the "stop" value from the global, so it executes once and then finishes.
    Then your program terminates.
    You need to restructure your program, because right now it doesn't make any sense at all.  Your block diagram would benefit from some serious tidying up as well, your wiring is a mess.  I suggest you look into a state machine architecture for this program.

  • Stop a while loop with a interrupt

    I' m using a while with a delay time of 60 seconds to perform a sub vi.
    So when I press the stop button it could take in extrem 2 minutes to stop the vi. I want to use something like an interrupt or jump order to stop the vi without waiting for the end of delay time.
    How can I create an interrupt in lab view 6.1.
    Thanks for help. bye uli

    If the delay is in the calling VI using Wait (mS), you can run a smaller delay multiple times (a while loop inside your main while loop), checking Stop between each of the smaller delays until the smaller delays add up to your bigger delay. See the attached
    But this technique doesn't stop the sub-VI: it just stops the loop in the main VI which will still run until the sub-VI is done. You could connect the Stop button to a global which the sub-VI checks in a loop to know if the calling VI pressed Stop.
    DelayWithStopCheck.VI ‏41 KB

  • How do i stop a while loop

    I'm new to labview and I'm having a problem stopping a while loop (running windows XP/2000 with the student edition of labview express 7).
    I'm doing a data acquisition program where I'm constantly reading in voltage and comparing it to a set point value, when the input voltage goes above the set point, i want the while loop to stop. How do I do this? I already have an LED going on when the criteria is met, but I'm not sure how to actually stop the loop (i.e. change the iteration value from true to false-i guess). If anyone can please assist me with this I would very much appreciate it.
    I've included my program too.
    Attachments: ‏60 KB

    Hello Everyone-
    I've just posted a message about stopping a while loop and it was answered accurately and quickly- thanks to LV_Pro and PauloM- thanks much- its nice too see that there are many helpful people out there! Unfortunately, I have 2 more questions to ask of the forum.
    My application is almost completed- I just need to add an elapsed time counter that will tell me how long it took for my LED to trigger (from my set point-i.e. when from 0:00:00 until when my loop stopped).
    Now I've found a perfect elapsed time counter on the NI web site contributed from Mike Hall from Ohmeda Medical- the page is here....
    So my first question is, it looks like I can just extend the while loop box in my 'CO detector... .vi' and paste just the code from the 'elapsed' while loop into my loop and I will be set- but do I need to change my wait until next multiple to be a 1000 too in my program? Probably, but I'm not sure hence the question- or other ideas would appreciated.
    My second question is now that my application is complete (after I add the elapsed time above), I need to exactly duplicate this process for 7 other DAQ inputs (i.e. right now I'm using only 1 of 8 analog inputs on the FP-AI110). So should I make my 'CO detector.. .vi' a separate program (I remember reading something about this in one of the posts earlier).
    Any help is very appreciated.
    Thank you again,
    Attachments: ‏60 KB

  • I have a for loop inside of while loop.when i press stop for while loop, i also would like to stop for can i solve this problem?thanks

    i have a for loop inside of while loop.when i press stop for while loop, i also would like to stop for can i solve this problem?thanks

    Hi fais,
    Following through with what JB suggested. The steps involved in replacing the inner for loop with a while loop are outlined below.
    You can replace the inner for loop with a while by doing the following.
    1) Right-click of the for loop and select "Repalce" then navigate to the "while loop".
    2) Make sure the tunnels you where indexing on with the for loop are still indexing.
    3) Drop an "array size" node on your diagram. Wire the array that determines the number of iterations your for loop executes into this "array size".
    4) Wire the output of the array size into the new while loop.
    5) Set the condition terminal to "stop if true".
    6)Drop an "OR" gate inside the while loop and wire its output to the while loops condition terminal.
    7) C
    reate a local of the boolean "stop" button, and wire it into one of the inputs of your OR gate. This will allow you to stop the inner loop.
    8) Drop a "less than" node inside the inner while loop.
    9) Wire your iteration count into the bottom input of the "less than".
    10) Wire the count (see step 4 above) into the top input of the less than. This will stop the inner loop when ever the inner loop has processed the last element of your array.
    Provided I have not mixed up my tops and bottoms this should accomplish the replacement.
    I will let others explain how to takle this task using the "case solution".
    Ben Rayner
    I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
    Rayner's Ridge is under construction

  • Start stop while loop with tab control

    I want to be able to start and stop a while loop by entering and leaving a tab.  I am using an event structure to do so but it doesn't seem elegant or the right way to do this.  The only way I was able to get it to kind of work is by unchecking the lock front panel box in the event structure.  I have attached a sample vi of what I have so far.
    Go to Solution.
    Loop ‏16 KB

    The problem is that you can't even stop the program by hitting the stop button until you leave the tab, which is not a friendly user interface.
    Event structures should just handle basic user events.  Any given event case should not take a long time to run.  While you are in the diagnostics tab, your code is stuck in that while loop.  Although fixing the lock front panel allows you to do other things, the LabVIEW is just queuing up all of those other UI events (like Stop button value change) and can't handle them until the inner while loop stops and allows the outer while loop to iterate again.
    You should have a parallel while loop to handle the waveform graph.  You can use notifiers or queues or an action engine FGV (see Ben's Action Engine Nugget) to pass the starting or stopping of the waveform graph update to the parallel while loop.

  • How do you start a loop with an event and end the loop when u release ....

    How do you start a loop with lets say an event of some sort, whether it be holding down a key or pressing the mouse click and then stopping the loop when you release that key or mouse button.?
    double c = 1.8, i = 1, max = 90, exp = 0;
    final double inc = 0.002; //speed at while it increases
    boolean f = false, g = false;
    while (true)
        while (f == false && stopMeter == false) //increasing speed going up to 90
            exp = Math.pow (c, i);
            i += inc;
            pAngle.setText (Math.round (exp) + "");
            if (exp > max)
                f = true;
                g = false;
            } //end if
        } //end while
        while (g == false && stopMeter == false)  //decreasing speed going down from 90
            exp = Math.pow (c, i);
            i -= inc;
            pAngle.setText (Math.round (exp) + "");
            if (exp < 1)
                g = true;
                f = false;
            } //end if
        } //end while
    } //end whilethis is a snippet of my increasing increments. Its for an angle meter. I can't get it to stop, when the user clicks or does something... the program just gets stuck in an infinite loop. I am still new to java and i do not know how to fix this.

    You are in the wrong forum. Try this one instead:

  • Stop multiple while loops in Vision Aquisition

    Hi,   I want to close multiple while loops with one stop button. I'm using the Vision Acquisition software for recording from multiple cameras and I want to close this recording from all cameras simultaneously. Since I'm knew to LABView I don't know how to do this. I'll include my VI here and maybe someone can help me.  Thanks!
    Go to Solution.
    Aquire Images 2 with ‏410 KB

    A local variable should be enough for your implementation. Look at the following article:
    Stopping Parallel While Loops in LabVIEW With One Stop Button
    Adnan Zafar
    Certified LabVIEW Architect
    Coleman Technologies

Maybe you are looking for