HR Master Record Replication to FI with Dual Control for Sensitive Fields

Dear Experts,
We have an issue on our project whereby employee records are maintained in HR, but replicated to FI on a regular basis via tcode PRAA, creating employee vendors.
We wish to activate the "Dual Control for Sensitive Fields" for the vendor master, however all employee vendors created via PRAA are also blocked and require confirmation.
Have any of you encountered a similar issue, and how do you resolve it?
Many thanks,
Mark

Hi,
Please go through the following path for configuration :
Point No. 1
1> Customer
IMG --> Financial Accounting (New) --> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable --> Customer Accounts --> Master Data --> Preparations for Creating Customer Master Data --> Define Sensitive Fields for Dual Control (Customers)
2> Vendor
IMG --> Financial Accounting (New) --> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable --> Vendor Accounts --> Master Data --> Preparations for Creating Vendor Master Data --> Define Sensitive Fields for Dual Control (Vendors)
Point No. 2
You can execute transaction code FD08 in background with a periodic job for each User ID who has authorization and tick on Accounts to be confirmed by me and send the output via mail through distribution list or each user can view output by viewing spool by going to transaction code SP01.
Point No. 3
Same as point 2 only need to select option Accounts refused.
Point No. 4
Yes
Point No. 5
Same as point 1
Hope your issue gets resolved.
Regards,
Tejas

Similar Messages

  • Dual Control for Sensitive fields  Transaction FD08?

    Hi all,
    When configuring the dual control for sensitive fields, Transaction i have a few questions:
    a) Is there a way (work around) by which I can add the sales area data fields to the catalogue of fields.
    b) More importantly, system allows to create the sales order even if the changes have not been confirmed by the respective approving authority, this alone beats the logic of configuring the sensitive fields.
    Is there some more setting or user exit which needs to be put in to prevent the user from creating the sales order unless the changes to the sensitive fields have been confirmed.
    Userfull answers will be rewarded!
    Thanks
    Kind Regards

    Hi,
    Please go through the following path for configuration :
    Point No. 1
    1> Customer
    IMG --> Financial Accounting (New) --> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable --> Customer Accounts --> Master Data --> Preparations for Creating Customer Master Data --> Define Sensitive Fields for Dual Control (Customers)
    2> Vendor
    IMG --> Financial Accounting (New) --> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable --> Vendor Accounts --> Master Data --> Preparations for Creating Vendor Master Data --> Define Sensitive Fields for Dual Control (Vendors)
    Point No. 2
    You can execute transaction code FD08 in background with a periodic job for each User ID who has authorization and tick on Accounts to be confirmed by me and send the output via mail through distribution list or each user can view output by viewing spool by going to transaction code SP01.
    Point No. 3
    Same as point 2 only need to select option Accounts refused.
    Point No. 4
    Yes
    Point No. 5
    Same as point 1
    Hope your issue gets resolved.
    Regards,
    Tejas

  • Dual control on sensitive fields change

    Dear Expert
    i would like to understand the implementation steps for dual control function. is there any complete guidance that able to share?
    i have the following questions too:
    based on my study, i don't see where is the control on this dual control function? because we still can post invoice and payment except blocking in payment run only.
    in the standard functionality, is there any notification can be sent to authorised person whenever there is a change of sensitive field?
    if the change is rejected, any notification can be sent to the person in charge, and how to do this?
    so when a change is being rejected, but the change is remains effective, meaning that user needs to change back to old value manually?
    is there a field named "One Time Account" in vendor master data? this was one of the sensitive fields that highlighted by IT auditor.
    thanks in advance for any feedback.
    Rgds
    Joslyn Tan

    Hi,
    Please go through the following path for configuration :
    Point No. 1
    1> Customer
    IMG --> Financial Accounting (New) --> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable --> Customer Accounts --> Master Data --> Preparations for Creating Customer Master Data --> Define Sensitive Fields for Dual Control (Customers)
    2> Vendor
    IMG --> Financial Accounting (New) --> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable --> Vendor Accounts --> Master Data --> Preparations for Creating Vendor Master Data --> Define Sensitive Fields for Dual Control (Vendors)
    Point No. 2
    You can execute transaction code FD08 in background with a periodic job for each User ID who has authorization and tick on Accounts to be confirmed by me and send the output via mail through distribution list or each user can view output by viewing spool by going to transaction code SP01.
    Point No. 3
    Same as point 2 only need to select option Accounts refused.
    Point No. 4
    Yes
    Point No. 5
    Same as point 1
    Hope your issue gets resolved.
    Regards,
    Tejas

  • Use of business partner functionality in combination with dual control

    Is there a generally agreed upon procedure to use the business partner functionality in combination with dual control? The problem is that when you block a business partner, the customer/ vendor master data aren't blocked automatically. You can then still use them in transactions, which leads to problems.
    So is there a way to make this work or a procedure to do this?
    Niels Vanwingh

    Thanks Masa,
    I did notice the 'Add external supplier from' in create supplier or bidder option. However there is a small catch and your experience may help.
    Let me explain the requirement and scenario here in SRM 7.
    We are implementing the Registration of Supplier scenario; both ROS and SRM are in same client. When a potential supplier registers themselves in the registration system, a BP number is created (an Internal number range is defined for this). After accepting the potential supplier in pre-select screen the purchaser has two options to transfer the potential supplier from the ROS system to SRM
    Option 1: He can select the accepted potential supplier from the supplier directory option and transfer the business partner to SRM. In this case the business partner number of the potential supplier is retained in SRM and a business partner with supplier and bidder tag is created. However the purchaser does not have any option to select which type of business partner he would like to create like supplier or bidder.
    Option 2: Purchase can go to create supplier or bidder option and choose the u2018Add external supplier formu2019 from the ROS system and create the business partner. The ROS business partner details are copied to the create supplier screen, but the purchaser have to provide an external business partner number for the supplier. This is because we have defined external number range for business partner for the vendors that are replicated from ERP to SRM.
    Objective is the ROS business partner should be retained in SRM with option to create as supplier and bidder and then manually create ERP supplier with same SRM BP number and map against SRM supplier.
    Is there any way we can achieve this?
    In SRM 5.5 with Manage business partner functionality we could achieve as system give us the option which business partner type we would like to create as well as retains the ROS BP number in SRM.
    Regards
    Sandeep

  • Can't get windows 8.1 with dual boot for fedora (linux) . system is UEFI .

    Can't get  windows 8.1 with  dual boot for fedora (linux) . system is UEFI .

    Hi,
    Any update here?
    We may seek help at Fedora forum as Milos suggested, if convenient we could share the related thread link here for reference.
    In addition, please also check the information in the similar thread:
    Dual Boot Windows 8 and Linux?
    Best regards
    Michael Shao
    TechNet Community Support

  • Dual Control for Vendor/Customer Master Data

    We can set Dual Control for Vendor/Customer Master Data. I have set it. According to the cycle, I have customized sensitive field, and make changes in Vendor/Customer A/c. Here the changes will be confirmed by other user who is authorised to confirm the changes. In this scenario, I would like to know, can we avoid this confirmation once we have actived? If, no than how could we confirm the changes and where can we set authorisation?

    Dear,
    No, You cannot avoid the dual check if You activate it. Another user by FK08 has to confirm the changes.
    Then You can delete the field for the dual control into the table T055F and no check will be done in the future.
    I hope this helps.
    Mauri

  • Dual Control for GL postings

    Hello
    My client, a bank, wants to activate Dual control for GL postings (so not only dual control for changing vendor or customer or bank or GL master data using sensitive fields in customizing). How can I realize this requirement?
    Regards
    Arjan
    Dual control  = A control procedure whereby the active involvement of two people is required to complete a specified process

    Hi,
    Do you want dual control over GL master data changes or GL postings? For master data changes you could look at user exit SAPMF02H and maybe block the GL after a change has been made. For dual control of postings you could look at the concept of parked documents and approval /posting via workflow.
    Cheers
    Kris

  • Make obligatory field on view with an attribute for view field equals to 'S

    I developed a maintenance view with an attribute for view field equals to 'S'.
    I want to make obligatory the field that appears in the window called: Determine work area: entry. 
    Is there some way to do it?
    Regards,

    Hi Kenneth,
    Goto the view definition (SE11), and set the attribute of the required field (column 'P'), and make it as Subset 'S'. This ensures that you cannot goto the display of view data without first entering the value for this field.
    The values displayed are also filtered for the selected value of this subset field.
    Cheers
    Rekha

  • Dual control for vendors per Company code

    Hi,
    we are  going to setup dual control (sensitive fields) for master data of vendors (fk01, fk02).
    Is there a possibilty to use dual control only for certain company codes and not all?
    How can I restrict this - via workflow, user authorisation, user exit?
    Any idea or solution?
    Thanks in advance.
    Best regards,
    Yvonne

    Hi,
    thank you both for your fast replies.
    Dual control means we want to confirm critical vendor changes (t code fk08, fk09).
    That means if someone Create (fk01) or Change (fk02) Vendor data with sensitive fields, another person has to approve this changes in transaction fk08 or fk09.
    But this confirmation in fk08 and fk09 should not be necassary for all changes in fk01 or fk02, but only for some company codes.
    In this standard workaround in SAP all vendor changes need to be approved. How can I restrict this that only some company codes need to be confirmed in transaction fk08 and fk09.
    Thanks.
    Yvonne

  • Can i use subfolders with source control for developer ?

    We'd like to use the repository as source control for our developer files.
    We planned to use the following structure in the repository:
    - Application Container
    - Folder
    - Files
    We uploaded the files in the repository.
    Now if we open the file through the ron the file will open in form builder, which is pretty good.
    The following thing I'de like to do is a checkout of the file ... ok ...i'm going to file - administration - checkout - the message occurs: no versionable object exists ! ... ? :-(.
    So I go to file - administration - source control options .. i'd like to say forms that it has to look for the file in a subfolder of the application system .. ok.
    After changing this i try again - the same message.
    If I return to source control options the container entry has been changed to the application folder.
    Are Subfolders not supported by the source control for developer ?
    Does anybody have the same effects ?
    Background informations ?
    Thanks in advance
    Mario
    null

    <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by [email protected]:
    Did you check the file in first? When you first put files in Repository, they are initially unversioned until the first checkin...
    Brian<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
    Hello Brian
    Sorry, for the delay. I worked for some day for another customer.
    Yes, i did.
    I'm working like this:
    - upload file with check in Folder which is under an application Folder (app - fmb )
    - then i check out the fmb in the repository
    - doubleclick in repository, which opens the form in form builder
    - change the file
    - File - Administration - check-in - connect to repository - choosing the workarea - and defining the folder (app - fmb ).
    - The file will be check-in, but directly under the folder app.
    Thanks in advance
    Mario
    null

  • Creation of Custom IDoc with Message control for sales Order

    Hi all,
    I am trying to create custom Outbound IDoc with message control.
    I wrote the code in a function module and i want to register that function module. (as in inbound registration of function module as in BD51).I am not knowing if that registration is necessary for outbound Idoc, if so in which transacition?
    Please list me the steps to create a custom IDoc for Message control.
    Thanks in advance,
    Regards,
    John.

    Hi,
    You need to use FM : MASTER_IDOC_DISTRIBUTE to create outbound idoc.fill the data in the tables EDIDC,EDIDD and generate the IDOC.
    check this link:
    Re: Master_IDoc_Distribute
    and use transaction : WEDI for IDOC configurations.
    here you will have all the transactions(step by step) to set the outbound IDOC configurations.
    Regards
    Appana

  • Problem with Table control & i/o field

    hi experts,
    i have a problem with both table control and i/o field.
    2 i/o fields and 1 table control.
    i/o field are common for table control data.
    when i am inserting ata from here to database table, table control data are inserted successfully, but from i/o field data are not inserted.
    kind regards,
    debendra

    Hi
    You must create data objects in your ABAP code having same name as your screen i/o fields. Now these objects will contain the data entered in your screen. Use these objects to insert data in your db table.
    Hope this helps
    Regards,
    Jayanthi.K

  • I want to modify customer master record's bank detail with BAPI or FM.

    I searched for everywhere but I couldn't find it.
    is there anybody who knows the function or the bapi ?
    Thank you for reading,
    Best regards,
    Jonghwan.

    EKES can be updated with function module
    ME_CONFIRMATION_UPDATE

  • SRM 7 : Vendor record replication in backend with Extended Classic Scenario

    Hello,
    We are implementing SRM 7 with Extended Classic Scenario and Supplier Self-registration.
    Can you explain what is to be configured to get the new vendors replicated to the backend?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    It is possible to transfer suppliers to ERP system, if you use 'Supplier registration with ERP' scenario. After registration and acceptance, newly registered suppliers would appear on supplier monitor from where you can transfer them to backend system.
    Check the below link for more details:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/cf/35074152aff323e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
    Regards,
    Sanjeev

  • Check in vendor master record between Bank Key and Bank Account for Belgium

    Hi all, just a request.
    In Belgium the first three digits of the Bank Account are always equal to the Bank Key.
    Unfortunately SAP does not check if they are different.
    Is there a standard check or should I "offer" a custom control?
    Thanks a lot !!!

    Dear,
    I checked right now in SPRO, but no validation with combination of Bank key and Bank account - that to particular first 3 digits not available. Option available is with ABAP Development.
    Option 1.
    You create Bank key using transaction FI01. Remove authorizations for FI01 from all users [Hope this already exists in your system].
    In vendor master, if you enter Bank key - which also selectable with F4 option, if bank key manually entered and PRESS ENTER, one more new screen open to enter Bank data. That means after pressing enter system validating our entries in bank key with database and when not available, populating new window to enter new entries.
    Now when ENTER pressed, suggest Development team to display an Error message 'Bank Key XXXXXXX not available'. By this user cannot enter a bank key as their wish.
    Once valid bank key selected from selection screen - validate bank account entry first 3 digits of Bank key 3 digits entered. If not matched - Error message.
    Option 2.
    Simply remove authorizations for XK01, XK02, MK01, MK02, FK01, FK02 from all users and authorize only one user in creation of Vendor master who aware and take care of entries.
    Regards,
    Syed Hussain.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to store serval char variables into a string variable?

    I have serval char variables, but i don't know how to put them together (without using arrays). I am thinking to store these char variables into a string variable but i don't know how to do it. For example, char letter1 = 'a', letter2 = 'b', letter3

  • MIC / VENDOR Trend analysis in Graphical mode

    Dear Freinds, please explain me how top perform trend analysis in graphical mode for a material procured from a vendor over a period of time. Report should display the charecterstics recorded for Material / Vendor combination. I am not using SPC char

  • Google chart problem with DPS

    hi, I tried to include google piechart as a web content to my folio , but I always get error  although chart generated and successfully loaded in all browsers that I tested ( safari, chrome, firefox, ie.) you can find the sample chart below http://ww

  • Without MRP, with BOM explosion

    Hi, I'm new to SAP and learning SAP SCM. I would like someone to brief me on what the following lines imply, especially 'without MRP, with BOM explosion'. "dependent requirements must be determined for materials that are planned in SAP ECC. So, you a

  • What is the new hole on the face of the iPhone 4S for?

    Above the screen of an iPhone 4 you find a long horizontal hole used as a speaker to place next to your ear.  The iPhone 4S has an additional horizontal hole above the "ear speaker".  What is this new hole for? Wild guess..  A second microphone for n