Hyperion Financial Reporting is taking long time to show the User POV

Hi,
we are using the HFR (version 9.3.1.2) and when i double click on any report in the workspace it is taking 5 minutes to show me the User POV. Can any one of you let me know how to find where the issue is.
Regards,
VJ

Hi VJ
Things that I am aware of that can slow down reports are:
1. Lots of members on the page (HFR tries to bring all the data into memory when run to speed up data display when changing from page to page)
2. Nesting of attributes (due to dynamic nature of calculations)
3. Nesting of dynamic calcs (similar to above)
If you have any of the above that could be your issue although it sounds like it may be more a hardware issue than an issue with the reports themselves. Does it always take that long? even if you re-run a report that has been run before?
Regards
Stuart

Similar Messages

VA05 & VA05N - Taking Long time to Give the Output.

Dear All,
VA05 & VA05N - Taking Long time to Give the Output for
Single date & Single Sales Office
if I create Z-Program (VBAK) also taking Long time for Single date & Single Sales Office.
Please Give some idea to Optimization the VA05 & VA05N.
Please Give your Valuable solution.
Thanks,
Durai.V

Dear Lakshmipathi,
In my Previous client (ECC 5.0) VA05N Executing very fast for one month date for all sales office.
They running SAP around 3 years, there data also huge but its giving fast output.
But my current client ECC 5.0, here running SAP around 2.5 years, But here taking Long time to give
the output for singe date & one Sales Office.
But Billing details report VF05N Executing very fast.
Thanks,
Durai.V

Taking Long Time To Show Printer Selection Window

Hi experts,
When users are taking printout through SAP,it's taking long time to show printer selection window(Local Printer Selection Windows)
present i am using sap ehp7 on sybase in windows.
Thanks in advance..

Hi,
Have you tried by reinstalling of printer with patch updation of printer as well as of windows also ? If possible try to uninstall the printer & check again by reselection.
Addition to it could you please share SAP GUI version on the system & confirm for, are you getting this issue on every system ( OS ) ?
Regards,
Gaurav

Query taking long time for EXTRACTING the data more than 24 hours

Hi ,
Query taking long time for EXTRACTING the data more than 24 hours please find the query and explain plan details below even indexes avilable on table's goe's to FULL TABLE SCAN. please suggest me.......
SQL> explain plan for select a.account_id,round(a.account_balance,2) account_balance,
2 nvl(ah.invoice_id,ah.adjustment_id) transaction_id,
to_char(ah.effective_start_date,'DD-MON-YYYY') transaction_date,
to_char(nvl(i.payment_due_date,
to_date('30-12-9999','dd-mm-yyyy')),'DD-MON-YYYY')
due_date, ah.current_balance-ah.previous_balance amount,
decode(ah.invoice_id,null,'A','I') transaction_type
3 4 5 6 7 8 from account a,account_history ah,invoice i_+
where a.account_id=ah.account_id
and a.account_type_id=1000002
and round(a.account_balance,2) > 0
and (ah.invoice_id is not null or ah.adjustment_id is not null)
and ah.CURRENT_BALANCE > ah.previous_balance
and ah.invoice_id=i.invoice_id(+)
AND a.account_balance > 0
order by a.account_id,ah.effective_start_date desc; 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)|
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 544K| 30M| | 693K (20)|
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 544K| 30M| 75M| 693K (20)|
|* 2 | HASH JOIN | | 544K| 30M| | 689K (20)|
|* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ACCOUNT | 20080 | 294K| | 6220 (18)|
|* 4 | HASH JOIN OUTER | | 131M| 5532M| 5155M| 678K (20)|
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| ACCOUNT_HISTORY | 131M| 3646M| | 197K (25)|
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| INVOICE | 262M| 3758M| | 306K (18)|
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - access("A"."ACCOUNT_ID"="AH"."ACCOUNT_ID")
3 - filter("A"."ACCOUNT_TYPE_ID"=1000002 AND "A"."ACCOUNT_BALANCE">0 AND
ROUND("A"."ACCOUNT_BALANCE",2)>0)
4 - access("AH"."INVOICE_ID"="I"."INVOICE_ID"(+))
5 - filter("AH"."CURRENT_BALANCE">"AH"."PREVIOUS_BALANCE" AND ("AH"."INVOICE_ID"
IS NOT NULL OR "AH"."ADJUSTMENT_ID" IS NOT NULL))
22 rows selected.
Index Details:+_
SQL> select INDEX_OWNER,INDEX_NAME,COLUMN_NAME,TABLE_NAME from dba_ind_columns where
2 table_name in ('INVOICE','ACCOUNT','ACCOUNT_HISTORY') order by 4;
INDEX_OWNER INDEX_NAME COLUMN_NAME TABLE_NAME
OPS$SVM_SRV4 P_ACCOUNT ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT_NAME ACCOUNT_NAME ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT CUSTOMER_NODE_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT ACCOUNT_TYPE_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_ACCOUNT_TYPE ACCOUNT_TYPE_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_INVOICE INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_PREVIOUS_INVOICE PREVIOUS_INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT_NAME_ID ACCOUNT_NAME ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT_NAME_ID ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_LAST_MODIFIED_ACCOUNT LAST_MODIFIED ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_INVOICE_ACCOUNT INVOICE_ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ACCOUNT ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ACCOUNT SEQNR ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_INVOICE INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ADINV INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_CIA CURRENT_BALANCE ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_CIA INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_CIA ADJUSTMENT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_CIA ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_LMOD LAST_MODIFIED ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ADINV ADJUSTMENT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_PAYMENT PAYMENT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ADJUSTMENT ADJUSTMENT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_APPLIED_DT APPLIED_DATE ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 P_INVOICE INVOICE_ID INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_INVOICE CUSTOMER_INVOICE_STR INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_LAST_MODIFIED_INVOICE LAST_MODIFIED INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_INVOICE_ACCOUNT ACCOUNT_ID INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_INVOICE_ACCOUNT BILL_RUN_ID INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_INVOICE_BILL_RUN BILL_RUN_ID INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_INVOICE_INVOICE_TYPE INVOICE_TYPE_ID INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_INVOICE_CUSTOMER_NODE CUSTOMER_NODE_ID INVOICE
32 rows selected.
Regards,
Bathula
Oracle-DBA

I have some suggestions. But first, you realize that you have some redundant indexes, right? You have an index on account(account_name) and also account(account_name, account_id), and also account_history(invoice_id) and account_history(invoice_id, adjustment_id). No matter, I will suggest some new composite indexes.
Also, you do not need two lines for these conditions:
and round(a.account_balance, 2) > 0
AND a.account_balance > 0
You can just use: and a.account_balance >= 0.005
So the formatted query isselect a.account_id,
       round(a.account_balance, 2) account_balance,
       nvl(ah.invoice_id, ah.adjustment_id) transaction_id,
       to_char(ah.effective_start_date, 'DD-MON-YYYY') transaction_date,
       to_char(nvl(i.payment_due_date, to_date('30-12-9999', 'dd-mm-yyyy')),
               'DD-MON-YYYY') due_date,
       ah.current_balance - ah.previous_balance amount,
       decode(ah.invoice_id, null, 'A', 'I') transaction_type
from account a, account_history ah, invoice i
where a.account_id = ah.account_id
   and a.account_type_id = 1000002
   and (ah.invoice_id is not null or ah.adjustment_id is not null)
   and ah.CURRENT_BALANCE > ah.previous_balance
   and ah.invoice_id = i.invoice_id(+)
   AND a.account_balance >= .005
order by a.account_id, ah.effective_start_date desc;You will probably want to select:
1. From ACCOUNT first (your smaller table), for which you supply a literal on account_type_id. That should limit the accounts retrieved from ACCOUNT_HISTORY
2. From ACCOUNT_HISTORY. We want to limit the records as much as possible on this table because of the outer join.
3. INVOICE we want to access last because it seems to be least restricted, it is the biggest, and it has the outer join condition so it will manufacture rows to match as many rows as come back from account_history.
Try the query above after creating the following composite indexes. The order of the columns is important:create index account_composite_i on account(account_type_id, account_balance, account_id);
create index acct_history_comp_i on account_history(account_id, invoice_id, adjustment_id, current_balance, previous_balance, effective_start_date);
create index invoice_composite_i on invoice(invoice_id, payment_due_date);All the columns used in the where clause will be indexed, in a logical order suited to the needs of the query. Plus each selected column is indexed as well so that we should not need to touch the tables at all to satisfy the query.
Try the query after creating these indexes.
A final suggestion is to try larger sort and hash area sizes and a manual workarea policy.alter session set workarea_size_policy = manual;
alter session set sort_area_size = 2147483647;
alter session set hash_area_size = 2147483647;

Cisco WS-C6513 taking long time to save the configuration

HI,
cisco WS-C6513 taking long time to save the configuration.
Any ideas?
Thank you

Hello,
do you have correct dial plan ? It very depends on the country you live and you have your VoIP operator.
Try to finish your dialing with # - this may speed it up.

Table valueset taking long time to open the LOV

Hi,
We added a table valueset to a concurrent program. The table vaueset showsTransaction number from ra_interface_lines_all table. It is having long list. So we added the partial string entering message before open a long list.But still it is taking long time.
Please any help on this highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Samba

Hi
Try to modify the query or creating an index will speed up the process.
Thanks & regards
Rajan

MDX report rendering takes long time and showing Conflict Message

Hi All,
This is my MDX Query
with member
[Measures].[Rent] as
IIF(IsEmpty([Measures].[Budget]),
NULL, [Measures].[Rent])
select {[Measures].[Rent]}
on columns,
[Property].[Address].[All].children *
DESCENDANTS([Account].[Account Hierarchy].[Account Group].[Expenditures],
[Account].[Account Tree].[Account]) *
[Property].[Property].[All].children
on rows
from
[Master]
When i comment [Property] Dimension member , i am able to get the result, but i need Property Dimension in MDX.
Can anyone give some idea ?
Thanks in advance

Hi Jarugulalaks,
According to your description, it take long time to render the report when using [Property] dimension, right?
In this case, the issue can be caused by that there are too many members under this dimension. In your query, you used CrossJoin function to join multiple dimensions which might cause the performance issue. If you cross-join medium-sized or large-sized sets
(e.g., sets that contain more than 100 items each), you can end up with a result set that contains many thousands of items—enough to seriously impair performance. You can use the NonEmptyCrossjoin function instead of Corssjoin function. For the detail
information, please see:
http://sqlmag.com/data-access/cross-join-performance
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms144797.aspx
Besides, the total time to generate a reporting server report can be divided into 3 elements: Time to retrieve the data (TimeDataRetrieval); Time to process the report (TimeProcessing); Time to render the report (TimeRendering). For the detail information,
please refer to the link below to see Charlie's reply.
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/a0962b54-6fc2-4111-b8f1-a3722a65fa05/how-to-improve-performance-of-report?forum=sqlanalysisservices#a0962b54-6fc2-4111-b8f1-a3722a65fa05
Regards,
Charlie Liao
TechNet Community Support

Oracle 10 gr studio taking long time to open the home/login page

Hi,
Oracle 10g studio taking the long time to open the home/ login page; when clicked on the launch workspace option.
Thanks,
Brijesh Kumar Singh.

How much memory do you have in your machine?
Are you running VMWare? How much physical (not logical) memory do you have allocated.
What else do you have concurrently running on your machine?
Dan

Query taking long time To Fectch the Results

Hi!
when I run the query,it takes too long time for fetching the resultsets.
Please find the query below for the same.
SELECT
A.BUSINESS_UNIT,
A.JOURNAL_ID,
TO_CHAR(A.JOURNAL_DATE,'YYYY-MM-DD'),
A.UNPOST_SEQ,
A.FISCAL_YEAR,
A.ACCOUNTING_PERIOD,
A.JRNL_HDR_STATUS,
C.INVOICE,
C.ACCT_ENTRY_TYPE,
C.LINE_DST_SEQ_NUM,
C.TAX_AUTHORITY_CD,
C.ACCOUNT,
C.MONETARY_AMOUNT,
D.BILL_SOURCE_ID,
D.IDENTIFIER,
D.VAT_AMT_BSE,
D.VAT_TRANS_AMT_BSE,
D.VAT_TXN_TYPE_CD,
D.TAX_CD_VAT,
D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT,
D.VAT_APPLICABILITY,
E.BILL_TO_CUST_ID,
E.BILL_STATUS,
E.BILL_CYCLE_ID,
TO_CHAR(E.INVOICE_DT,'YYYY-MM-DD'),
TO_CHAR(E.ACCOUNTING_DT,'YYYY-MM-DD'),
TO_CHAR(E.DT_INVOICED,'YYYY-MM-DD'),
E.ENTRY_TYPE,
E.ENTRY_REASON,
E.AR_LVL,
E.AR_DST_OPT,
E.AR_ENTRY_CREATED,
E.GEN_AR_ITEM_FLG,
E.GL_LVL, E.GL_ENTRY_CREATED,
(Case when c.account in ('30120000','30180050','30190000','30290000','30490000',
'30690000','30900040','30990000','35100000','35120000','35150000','35160000',
'39100050','90100000')
and D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT <> 0 then 'Ej_Momskonto_med_moms'
When c.account not in ('30120000','30180050','30190000','30290000',
'30490000','30690000','30900040','30990000','35100000','35120000','35150000',
'35160000','39100050','90100000')
and D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT <> 25 then 'Momskonto_utan_moms' end)
FROM
sysadm.PS_JRNL_HEADER A,
sysadm.PS_JRNL_LN B,
sysadm.PS_BI_ACCT_ENTRY C,
sysadm.PS_BI_LINE D,
sysadm.PS_BI_HDR E
WHERE A.BUSINESS_UNIT = '&BU'
AND A.JOURNAL_DATE BETWEEN TO_DATE('&From_date','YYYY-MM-DD')
AND TO_DATE('&To_date','YYYY-MM-DD')
AND A.SOURCE      = 'BI'
AND A.BUSINESS_UNIT = B.BUSINESS_UNIT
AND A.JOURNAL_ID      = B.JOURNAL_ID
AND A.JOURNAL_DATE = B.JOURNAL_DATE
AND A.UNPOST_SEQ      = B.UNPOST_SEQ
AND B.BUSINESS_UNIT = C.BUSINESS_UNIT
AND B.JOURNAL_ID = C.JOURNAL_ID
AND B.JOURNAL_DATE = C.JOURNAL_DATE
AND B.JOURNAL_LINE = C.JOURNAL_LINE
AND C.ACCT_ENTRY_TYPE = 'RR'
AND C.BUSINESS_UNIT = '&BU'
AND C.BUSINESS_UNIT = D.BUSINESS_UNIT
AND C.INVOICE = D.INVOICE
AND C.LINE_SEQ_NUM = D.LINE_SEQ_NUM
AND D.BUSINESS_UNIT = '&BU'
AND D.BUSINESS_UNIT = E.BUSINESS_UNIT
AND D.INVOICE = E.INVOICE
AND E.BUSINESS_UNIT = '&BU'
AND
((c.account in ('30120000','30180050','30190000','30290000','30490000',
'30690000','30900040','30990000','35100000','35120000','35150000','35160000',
'39100050','90100000')
and D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT <> 0)
OR
(c.account not in ('30120000','30180050','30190000','30290000','30490000',
'30690000','30900040','30990000','35100000','35120000','35150000','35160000',
'39100050','z')
and D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT <> 25)
GROUP BY
A.BUSINESS_UNIT,
A.JOURNAL_ID,
TO_CHAR(A.JOURNAL_DATE,'YYYY-MM-DD'),
A.UNPOST_SEQ, A.FISCAL_YEAR,
A.ACCOUNTING_PERIOD,
A.JRNL_HDR_STATUS,
C.INVOICE,
C.ACCT_ENTRY_TYPE,
C.LINE_DST_SEQ_NUM,
C.TAX_AUTHORITY_CD,
C.ACCOUNT,
D.BILL_SOURCE_ID,
D.IDENTIFIER,
D.VAT_TXN_TYPE_CD,
D.TAX_CD_VAT,
D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT,
D.VAT_APPLICABILITY,
E.BILL_TO_CUST_ID,
E.BILL_STATUS,
E.BILL_CYCLE_ID,
TO_CHAR(E.INVOICE_DT,'YYYY-MM-DD'),
TO_CHAR(E.ACCOUNTING_DT,'YYYY-MM-DD'),
TO_CHAR(E.DT_INVOICED,'YYYY-MM-DD'),
E.ENTRY_TYPE, E.ENTRY_REASON,
E.AR_LVL, E.AR_DST_OPT,
E.AR_ENTRY_CREATED,
E.GEN_AR_ITEM_FLG,
E.GL_LVL,
E.GL_ENTRY_CREATED,
C.MONETARY_AMOUNT,
D.VAT_AMT_BSE,
D.VAT_TRANS_AMT_BSE
having
(Case when c.account in ('30120000','30180050','30190000','30290000',
'30490000','30690000','30900040','30990000','35100000','35120000','35150000',
'35160000','39100050','90100000')
and D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT <> 0 then 'Ej_Momskonto_med_moms'
When c.account not in ('30120000','30180050','30190000','30290000','30490000',
'30690000','30900040','30990000','35100000','35120000','35150000','35160000',
'39100050','90100000')
and D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT <> 25 then 'Momskonto_utan_moms' end) is not null
So Could you provide the solution to fix this issue?
Thanks
senthil

[url http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=501834&tstart=0]When your query takes too long ...
Regards,
Rob.

Taking long time in displaying the messages in SXMB_MONI

Dear All,
When I go to SXMB_MONI to display messages, it takes very long time in displaying the messgaes.
And when i double clicks on any message to see its details then also it takes very long in opening the details. During this period server also becomes so much slow that it becomes very difficult to even open any other screen on the server and it looks as server has got hanged up. But after a long wait once the messages are displayed in SXMB_MONI then the server behaves normally.
Kindly suggest what might be the error.
Regards,
NJ

Hi,
Please check in tcode SM50, if there are any archiving, deletion jobs are scheduled or check in SXMB_ADMIN-->Persistence layer analysis if the level is too high, schedule the switch delete procedure.Also check in ST06 what is the Utilization %.
Thanks!

Concurrent Managers are taking long time to pick the request- Urgent help

Hi All,
We have upgrade 11.5.10.2 to 12.0.6 with PCP and loading balancing.
Whennever concurrent request is submitted it takes long time to pick the request.
We have the increases proceseses and reduced the sleep time of the standard manager.
Any inputs on this.
Thanks&Regards,
Apps DBA

Hi,
Was this working properly before? If yes, what changes have been done recently?
How many rows you have in the FND_CONCURRENT_PROCESSES and FND_CONCURRENT_REQUESTS tables?
We have the increases proceseses and reduced the sleep time of the standard manager.Did you bounce the CM after doing these changes?
Regards,
Hussein

F4 Process takes a long time to show the values

Hi gurus,
We are facing an issue with the InfoObject Sup. Company Code 0COMP_CODE, this characteristic has 200 enties in the Master Data, and 10000 values in the SID table.
This infoObject is being used in a Query (3.X version) and when we press the F4 to obtain the values, it takes a long time to show them.
The query takes data from a Multiprovider, and the multiprovider only has one Cube.
The issue is happening with a lot of query (obviosly, with the same object), and there is no reason to do it I think, because the amount of records is not too much (10 K rec).
So, what do you think is happening? all your help will be helpfull.
Regards, Federico

Frederico / Rob,
setting the InfoObject property of 'Query execution filter value selection' to 'values in master data table' has the consequence that it is indeed faster on the query selection screen, but then when selecting filter values after the report has been displayed is not restricted to the values in the report results - again all master data values are shown for selection. This is not acceptable to our users.
Ideally, I would like to see two settings for query execution - master data for the initial selection screen, only posted values for navigation after the query has been executed. But I doubt that's going to happen.
In BW3.5 I seem to remember that you can set the choice of F4 display within the web template (can't in BI7).
NB for BI7 Java execution, examine the 'order for F4 help' on the InfoObject attributes and remove most of SAP's default settings. This will speed things up a little.
David

[SOLVED] NetworkManager taking long time to show available wireless

I've been using Arch since May. I never had any problems connecting to wifi--my laptop has always connected automatically to my home wireless network within a few seconds of booting to my desktop. I use Network Manager, with the network-manager-applet on my panel.
All of a sudden, for no apparent reason, every time I boot now I cannot connect to the internet for several minutes: When I click on the panel applet there are no available wireless networks listed. It's only after several minutes (it varies slightly, usually after about 2 minutes) that available wireless networks finally show up in the applet.
The physical wifi switch on the laptop is securely in the "on" position. NetworkManager is running as soon as the system boots, and lsmod shows me that iwlwifi module is loaded. There are no errors in the journal. I haven't changed any network settings in a long time. Why is it suddenly taking NetworkManager several minutes to show me the available wireless networks after a reboot?
EDIT: During the time when I have no wireless networks available I get this:
eileen@vaio ~ $ nmcli general status
STATE CONNECTIVITY WIFI-HW WIFI WWAN-HW WWAN
disconnected none enabled enabled enabled enabled
eileen@vaio ~ $ iwconfig # notice that wlp2s0 is not listed in the output!
enp4s0 no wireless extensions.
lo no wireless extensions.
eileen@vaio ~ $ nmcli dev connect wlp2s0
Error: Device 'wlp2s0' not found.
eileen@vaio ~ $ sudo ip link set wlp2s0 up
Cannot find device "wlp2s0"
After wireless networks finally show up in the applet, I get this:
eileen@vaio ~ $ nmcli general status
STATE CONNECTIVITY WIFI-HW WIFI WWAN-HW WWAN
connected full enabled enabled enabled enabled
eileen@vaio ~ $ iwconfig
enp4s0 no wireless extensions.
wlp2s0 IEEE 802.11abgn ESSID:"blue"
Mode:Managed Frequency:2.437 GHz Access Point: 98:FC:11:86:9C:EC
Bit Rate=78 Mb/s Tx-Power=15 dBm
Retry short limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off
Power Management:off
Link Quality=62/70 Signal level=-48 dBm
Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0
Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:34 Missed beacon:0
lo no wireless extensions.
tun0 no wireless extensions.
Could the problem be that the kernel is taking a long time to detect my wireless card and designate it as wlp2s0 (which needs to happen before NetworkManager can do anything)? If so, how can I tell the kernel to prioritize looking for a wireless card when the system boots?
Last edited by bdantas (2014-12-09 03:22:29)

After I'm finally connected, dmesg gives me this:
eileen@vaio ~ $ dmesg | grep iwlwifi
[ 15.089340] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: can't disable ASPM; OS doesn't have ASPM control
[ 15.089499] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: irq 44 for MSI/MSI-X
[ 15.190528] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: Direct firmware load failed with error -2
[ 15.190531] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: Falling back to user helper
[ 75.324699] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: Direct firmware load failed with error -2
[ 75.324705] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: Falling back to user helper
[ 135.843224] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: loaded firmware version 9.221.4.1 build 25532 op_mode iwldvm
[ 135.926866] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: CONFIG_IWLWIFI_DEBUG disabled
[ 135.926874] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: CONFIG_IWLWIFI_DEBUGFS disabled
[ 135.926879] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: CONFIG_IWLWIFI_DEVICE_TRACING enabled
[ 135.926885] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: Detected Intel(R) Centrino(R) Advanced-N 6200 AGN, REV=0x74
[ 135.926991] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: L1 Enabled - LTR Disabled
[ 136.063045] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: L1 Enabled - LTR Disabled
[ 136.069775] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: Radio type=0x1-0x3-0x1
[ 136.288670] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: L1 Enabled - LTR Disabled
[ 136.295360] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: Radio type=0x1-0x3-0x1
Notice the firmware load failures at 15 and 75 seconds after boot, and the fact that it's not until 135 seconds that the firmware for the wireless card is finally loaded.
This suggests to me that the culprit is either the kernel (and/or its iwlwifi module) or the actual firmware. I will try different versions of these packages (linux, linux-lts, and linux-firmware) and will report back.
Last edited by bdantas (2014-12-09 12:31:55)

My procedure is taking long time to process the attendance information?

Dear Experts
I have procedure which runs employees monthly attendance sorry here I am unable to post the procedure it contains 4500 lines and I am using oracle 11g R2 version on Windows 2008 R2 Server with 4 GB RAM
I have run my procedure for 1 section which have 180 employees count and procedure took 28 min of time to complete the process for 1 month and I have total 3000+ employee to run the attendance process for all the employee for 1 month.
I am Storing all the employees in Cursor then looping one by one with Dates (1st to End of the month one date for all the employees) using While Loop.
or
can you give me the suggestion how can I find at which stage procedure is taking time in the 4500 lines of code.

I tried with BULK COLLECT with for loop however it takes 6 hrs 50 min to complete the process where as cursor completes it with in 25 min
Below is the type which I have used
TYPE employee_nums_t IS TABLE OF employeemaster.empno%TYPE
              INDEX BY PLS_INTEGER;
      l_employee_nums   employee_nums_t;
select EMPM.EMPNO BULK COLLECT INTO l_employee_nums
            FROM EMPLOYEEATTENDANCE EMPA,EMPLOYEEMASTER EMPM,SECTIONMASTER SEM,CATEGORYMASTER CGM
            WHERE SEM.SECTIONID=EMPM.SECTIONID AND EMPM.CATEGORYID=CGM.CATEGORYID
            AND EMPM.CATEGORYID!='4'
            AND (P_SECTIONID IS NULL OR SEM.SECTIONID = P_SECTIONID)
            AND (P_CATEGORYID IS NULL OR EMPM.CATEGORYID=P_CATEGORYID)
            AND (P_EMPNO IS NULL OR EMPA.EMPNO = P_EMPNO) AND EMPA.EMPNO=EMPM.EMPNO
            GROUP BY EMPM.EMPNO ORDER BY TO_NUMBER(EMPM.EMPNO);
FOR indx IN 1 .. l_employee_nums.COUNT
        LOOP
          ----- (Here is remaining program)
          END LOOP;

Taking long time to get the data while trying to drill down the freechar's

hi experts,
i have a query on 0sd_c03, in this query PLANT and SALES ORG. are in free characteristics, whenever i am trying to drill down the plant or sales organization it is taking lot of time to retrieve the data.
what is the problem,
give me suggestions to solve this problem.
thanks in advance,
venkat

From RSA1 double click on the infoobjects. Goto Business Explorer tab
For the option Query Execution Filter Val. Selection select Only posted values for navigation
Try whether thsi setting solves your problem

Hyperion Financial Reporting is taking long time to show the User POV

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for