I am confused why my reply includes content that is not permitted

I tried to reply to this topic:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2691835&tstart=0
and got the "you have included content in your post that is not permitted":
I can't even quote my reply here (was met with the same warning) and am quite certain I did not violate the terms. This is very upsetting - how can I go about finding out what I did wrong?

Thank you, LS; nothing from hosts at this point.
What I said - in different words - was something like the OP might have answered his own question if he set up his messages to be stored on the server; that I only have POP but thought if it was an i... account it may have something to do with those settings and that he could move the messages to a different mailbox to make sure the messages would be available in Mail.
We'll see if this wording will make it; and, yes, I've read the ToU many times, and do not understand why this would not be permitted.
As it is now, the poster's question seems to have been answered with similar suggestions, so mine (which would have been the first reply) is no longer of value; but I'd still like to know which part I violated.
Edit - got the same message; deleted the server name and inserted ... and now it worked? At least one of the replies included the server name (three letters starting with an "a") and were successfully posted.
Message was edited by: Barbara Daniels1

Similar Messages

"You are posting content that is not permitted"

This may look like a glitch as I wanted to start a new thread and wrote just technical stuff (about browsing, Safari etc.) in the message box. I can't figure out what it disliked, however, it's strange. Tried to sign out and sign it, no difference, the alert still pops up. What is it?
All the best,
I.S.

scrutinizer
There is a Filter - not the same as the "& words you can't say on TV (and more)" Filter, you've seen 'em " That giant s***ing sound ", etc. - that triggers you Alert/Error message. It not only has 'Terms' it doesn't like, but ' PHRASES ' it censors.
I wrote a long post once and got nailed, so I ...
copied
started over
pasted
trimmed various paragraphs until I found the offender paragraph
trimmed until I found the offender itself
It turned out to be a phrase, so I will illustrate how it doesn't and does offend - easier!
I like to live my life lolling by the stream, fishing.
Many could not watch the " L I V E Stream " on the AppleWatch Launch Event - it doesn't like the phrase, don't ask me why (unless it was an embarrassment)
As these Filter Lists are closely held, there is no way to deduce what is offensive and what is permitted. Frustrating.
The Filter is clearly very literal in its application if I could defeat it so simply.
best luck
ÇÇÇ

"You have included content in your post that is not permitted" when trying to post very positive feedback about Apple.

So I spent 2 hours writing a huge post about how I love what Apple has done with the Audio/MIDI/Sound config tools in OSX.
I spent alot of time trying to be positive. And i get to the end and click "Post" - this stops me and gives me the following vague message:
"You have included content in your post that is not permitted."
I am not sure what this means or why it appeared. I used no negative content in my post, no cursing or trolling or anything... And i wouldn't try to troll or flame on these forums anyways. I've posted some problems I've had, which were all addressed very quickly by the way. And I've always said what I thought, but never just posted things to be negative.
And then after my post is rejected, i tried again. The discussion forums offered to restore my previous draft, but I clicked yes and nothing happened. Then the entire Discussions site pretty much stopped functioning... I tried closing reopening Chrome. I tried a completely new session in Chrome Incognito. I tried using Safari. None worked.
I was then offered a survey to take. I clicked "yes", and nothing happened. Then I looked at the Javascript Link for the survey and used the Chrome console to send the javascript anyways. And then it said the survey was behind my browser (it wasn't) and there was an "X" button to close the yellow notification at the top of the page. Then restarted my computer and it's finally working, but my post is still being rejected, which is ridiculous.
Anyways, went through alot to say something positive. That is the exact thing that gets to me though, it's the censorship. Why am I not allowed to say something good? Hopefully this one goes through...

I don't believe I'm circumventing any DRM/Copyright. I'm currently enrolled in a Harvard eDx Copyright Law class. As long as you are original and offer a minimum of creativity, you are eligable for a copyright, without any need for registration. But that's besides the point. I can see how it may have flagged the post though.
Ultimately, what I was trying to do at the time is play music using software that I own and stream this in online video. But the comment about streaming my personal music online is just an example of something awesome I can do with an Apple product.
Thanks for the link to the feedback page though. I'll go ahead and send it in.

You have included content in your post that is not permitted.

I posted a question in the discussion and replied the response "You have included content in your post that is not permitted." I re-read my post. There was no swear word, no questions about doing anything illegal or violation any TOS, and no link that could cause a problem. So I started editing my post and I found the guilty word: "Streaming" and "Live" together (let's see if it goes through in this post).
My suggestion is, instead of giving a broad statement, to actually list the words that are not permitted. This will save us time trying to figure out what offended the automated censor.

EricDu wrote:
So, once again, legit users are punished for the behavior of a few bad apples (no pun intended).
Yep. That's the way of the world.
I still think the filters could be more friendly. Taking, for example, the user's posting history into account.
I would agree, but Jive, the software that these forums run on, may not allow that sort of flexibility. Or Apple Legal may not allow that sort of flexibility.
Regards.

I burned disks of previously purchased content that is not available thru iTunes anymore but the latest ver. of iTunes won't let me copy this same content onto a new comp. Is there a way to do this or maybe an earlier ver. of iTunes to download?

I burned disks of previously purchased content that is not available thru iTunes anymore but the latest ver. of iTunes won't let me copy this same content onto a new comp. Is there a way to do this or maybe an earlier ver. of iTunes to download?

Those links in case you need them:
iTunes Windows 10.3.1 (32-bit)
iTunes Windows 10.3.1 (64-bit)
tt2

After updating to Maverick some emails arrive with contents that do not belong to Sender and title.

Since updating to Mavericks I'm receiving some e-mails with contents that does not match the Sender and Title. Also receiving blank emails that DO have contents on my iPhone.

HI..
A rebuild can help > Mail (Mavericks): Rebuild mailboxes

Firefox is displaying content that is not in english

Since Firefox went to 4.0 I'm having content on web pages displayed in some odd language. It's like something is set to something other than English. When I copy and paste the gibberish it paste in english

Sounds like a problem with fonts that do not work or are corrupted. Try to reinstall the font(s) that are used on those web pages.

I have included content in my post that is not permitted.

And what content might that be?
I removed mention of F**mville and M**fia wars facebook apps and that fixed it. But I know I've seen far worse than than after clicking "quote original".

Hi etresoft,
We had a persistent re-occurring spammer that used the term M*fia in the posts. To stop them we added that term to the blocked word list.
Hopefully it won't be needed too often here.
Nubz N.

"You have included content in your post that is not permitted. " Huh?

I can't post a message, and am getting the above message. Why? There's nothing wrong or illicit with the simple message I'm trying to post.

That's because I can't post the message to my other topic,
"Mail not saving sent messages to AOL "sent items" folder"
I just resorted to sending a personal messages to one of the responders.

Running JSP content that is NOT in a jsp file

What I would like to do is this:
          I have an application deployed as an ear file. I would like to add JSP
          files while the server is running (much like you can do in exploded
          format).
          Furthermore, I would like to have the JSP content stored in an
          external medium, such as a database. As far as I can tell, I cant work
          out how to make JSPs run from anything other then a file relative to
          the context root (and fixed in the case of an ear).
          There must be a weblogic JSP engine class that I can extend/decorate
          to read the JSP from another location.
          Any ideas?


"MikeNeale" == MikeNeale <[email protected]> writes:
                    MikeNeale> What I would like to do is this:
          MikeNeale> I have an application deployed as an ear file. I would like to add JSP
          MikeNeale> files while the server is running (much like you can do in exploded
          MikeNeale> format).
          MikeNeale> Furthermore, I would like to have the JSP content stored in an
          MikeNeale> external medium, such as a database. As far as I can tell, I cant work
          MikeNeale> out how to make JSPs run from anything other then a file relative to
          MikeNeale> the context root (and fixed in the case of an ear).
          MikeNeale> There must be a weblogic JSP engine class that I can extend/decorate
          MikeNeale> to read the JSP from another location.
          You're probably better off looking in a different direction, by having your
          application use dynamically generated XML along with transformers.
          ===================================================================
          David M. Karr ; Java/J2EE/XML/Unix/C++
          [email protected] ; SCJP; SCWCD

ICal publishing link includes events that are not on calendar

I have an event that is showing up in the publish link of iCal, even though it is not on the calendar itself. I have search my computer inside and out and cannot find where it is coming from. I need to get this deleted off asap! Can anyone help?? Thanks!

Tried these...still didn't work.
I believe it was put in through entourage before we began using iCal in 2006. I had set it up on my iBook. We transferred everything to my new Macbook Pro in 2007. This is the only entry that I have had a problem with. It has been showing up ever since then and we haven't had any luck getting rid of it.
We only used the entourage a short time before changing to the iCal. Short of setting up a new calendar and then going one by one and changing the events to the new calendar I don't know what else to do. This is for a church calendar that we have linked to our website, so it will take a little while to get everything done. If that doesn't work, I will just give up!
I will wait to hear back from you to see if there is any other option. I REALLY appreciate your time and effort in my problem! THANKS A BUNCH!!!!

Being redirected to random websites/content not permitted in my post!

First things first - when I tried to post this query I got a message saying that I had included content which was not permitted. I'm wondering if it's to do with my overall problem which is that I have managed to pick up some kind of virus (I know Macs aren't supposed to get viruses but it's the only word I can think of) that's redirecting me to random websites - but not just when I'm in Safari/Firefox, when I'm in the middle of inserting information into a post, or anything online. For example, when I had to select a category below for the query, I ended up being directed to the Mackeeper site!
So something has got hold of my ability to access websites. I tried clearing the cache but that didn't make any difference. I then looked up how to clear the DNS cache and tried that, but with no luck.
I'm tearing my hair out now, so any help would be appreciated.
In case I can't update info below, I'm running Yosemite on a MacAir and use Safari as my main browser but as the problem also occurred in Firefox I'm guessing it's deeper than just cookies!
Thanks in advance!
WG

1. That's due to the board software and not malware.
2. Click here and follow the instructions, or if desired, download and run Adware Medic; to do this, copy and paste http://www.adwaremedic.com/AdwareMedic.dmg into your browser's address bar.
(115798)

Content Not Permitted?

When I just now tried to post a reply to a message, the result was this: "You have included content in your post that is not permitted." There was no hint of what content was found to be objectionable. My post contained basically four lines of non-abusive, non-profane text and three links to articles on Mac-related Web sites. I sure which this forum's software would give me a clue about what it didn't like. My only approach now is to try removing one thing at a time until it's acceptable.
Edit: I saved all the text of my attempted post in a TextEdit document, then deleted the text in the post window a section at a time until it was accepted. This required removing pretty much everything before I could post it. Then I edited the post and added back the original content a section at a time. In several iterations I was able to add back everything that I had originally posted. I have to conclude that (a) the forum software is deranged or (b) the checks for edited content are different than for original content.

+True, but not impossible. See these fairly recent stories:+
+http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2010/06/spyware-trojan-hitching-ride-on-third- party-mac-screensavers.ars+
+http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/20/pinheadmactrojan/+
+http://www.maclife.com/article/feature/protectyour_mac_phishing_trojan_horses_andviruses+
Was it this post? It may be that phishing or Trojan Horse triggered something, but if this is the post you are referring to, there's absolutely nothing objectionable in it.

How to read contents of files that do not fall under public security group?

Hi,
I need to read the contents of a WCM based xml file that does not fall under public security.
The process is like this:
First the user makes chnages to the content.
The workflow will be triggred based on the security group metadata that is associated with the content.
Once the content is finally approved our workflow calls a custom idoc script.
First we tried directly reading the xml contents from the idoc script which was still in the context of workflow. But since content item is still in workflow I was not able to read the changes. So I created a separate content publisher thread and read the DOC_INFO and checked for the dStatus value. If the value is RELEASED then I reading contents by calling ssIncludeXml idoc script.
This was working fine for public content. But now the requirement is that all content cannot be public. Content authors should not be able to edit the content that does not belong to their group, So we created security groups (and roles) and are associating that groups to the relavent content.
Beacuse of this change I am not not able to read the non public content. The call to DOC_INFO_BY_NAME service, which gives all the content files' metadata, is expecting the user to be logged in to give the details.
I tried calling the CHECKIN service with sysadmin and captured the cookies returned by that service and use cookies for the DOC_INFO_BY_NAME service call. But the service call was faling. It is throing the 401 forbidden error with the message that user needs to be logged in to get the details.
How to address this problem. Someone please help.
Note: I also tried using ridc for this. I was able to get it working but since it is executing in the context of server ridc api is changing server's environment properties like HTTP_HOST, HTTP_CGIPATHROOT etc. It also seemed like system was becoming non functional after using ridc. When I called check-in the system metadata values like security group are no more loading. Not sure if ridc is the culprit here but worried that it might be causing this issue.
Regards,
Pratap

Sorry, I posted too much details while posting this question. I was saying "not able to read *non* public content".
Anyway, I was able to resolve the issue. I was able to authenticate with sysadmin credentials in the request to service using basic authentication and was able to read doc info with that credential.
But I realized there is more than option for reading secure content.
- I could set user name as sysadmin in the m_environment (if I am in the context of a service) and the call the DOC_INFO_BY_NAME service.
- I can post an HTTP request to DOC_INFO_BY_NAME service with sysadmin credentials and do basic authorization via the connection. (This is what i have done successfully as of now )
- I could add guest role to all security groups with R (read) privileges.
I will look into all options and implement the one which is more apt.
Regards,
Pratap

Mask included contents in design panel

I have an include file that contains a few functions that produce the necessary code for an html email. Since it makes tweaking the layout so much easier the include file contains mainly html code, e.g. (much simplified):
Include file:
<?php
function htmlmail($salutation)
ob_start(); ?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html"; charset="iso-8859-1"></head>
<body>
<p>Dear <?php echo htmlentities($salutation); ?></p>
</body>
</html>
<?php return ob_get_clean();
?>
I don't want DW CS4 to show this code in the design panel of the main file, since it displays incorrectly (thinks it has got to the end of the document, when of course it hasn't really even started.
Can anyone think of a tidy solution?
Ed

Thanks David, I'm loving heredoc!
I did explain why I wanted html markup in the include (I am creating an html email body), and now that I am using heredoc it confuses DW just enough to be perfect (I could of course have used a PHP string, but it is visually a lot clearer to be able to see proper indentation on the screen, especially when debugging).
Ed

I am confused why my reply includes content that is not permitted

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for