I'm in the market for the new Mac Pro.

I'm in the market for the new Mac Pro. I've been waiting for it to be released and have some cash set aside for this. I am a video editor and use Premiere Pro CC, and After Effects. My primary content is simple documentary films - so nothing too intense, but always HD (1080) video. I don't see 4k in my future but it's always a possibility so I want to future-proof my purchase for the next 3 years or so. With respect to storage space and RAM, I can make that decision myself based mostly on cashflow (since they are likely both user-expandable). However, with the basic configuration of the number of cores and video graphics card, I could use some advice. I think they are both set for the life of the computer, so important to get it right.
My current thinking is to start with the 6 core model (I guess I have no real reason for this decision, except that I feel like the 4-core base model is put there to make the price feel lower, while the real advantages in performance start at the 6 core - am I way off on this one?). But, I wonder if I should spring for the 8 core or even the 12 core? Probably overkill for me - out of my budget anyway.
The other decision is the graphics card - is the D500 enough? Will it be limiting factor in the future? Or should I move to D700?
Here are the cost differences:
from 6 core to 8 core is $1500
from D500 to D700 is $600
Which is worth it? (neither, both?)
Thanks.

Whether it's worth it depends more on you and what your current and future needs are.
The good news is that Adobe's CC apps can already take advantage of the AMD FirePro GPU's in the Mac Pro, and offer hardware acceleration of the Mercury Playback Engine, which you'll see in Premiere, After Effects, and Media Encoder.  According to the Adobe staffers I've talked to, even the FirePro D300's will see a big benefit, in fact they say you won't see a big bump by upgrading the GPU.  As far as Adobe's apps are concerned, their OpenCL use is all single precision, and the D500/D700 upgrades put a lot of weight in double precision performance (which is unused in their apps).  Their recommendation - put the bulk of your budget on cores and RAM.
How many depends on how elaborate and complex your work is.  Simple documentary films with the odd effects, transitions, titles, and grading.. you'd be fine with a 6-core IMO.  If you're leaning towards getting into really layered comps and effects, you'd shorten those long render times down a lot with the 8-core.  As for memory, I'd recommend at least 4GB per physical core.
Good luck!

Similar Messages

  • I am in the market for a new HP Laptop.

    I am in the market for a new HP Laptop seeing as how my current one is starting to die out on me. I am looking for one that would last me at least 3 or more years like my current has and i kinda have one i like in mind at this link:
    http://www.bestbuy.com/site/envy-17-3-laptop-8gb-memory-1tb-hard-drive/9769246.p?id=1219041359741&sk...
    So my my main question is going to be this: Does Best buy match prices or beat them out if i find the same model cheaper and with a mail in rebate on another retailer's website such as office depot?
    I am doing price comparisons right now, because i don't know how long my current HP Pavillion Entertainment PC will hold out. I have had it for 3 years and now my on board graphics chipset or the LCD Monitor one are starting to mess up on me and i had to replace the fan and battery almost 2 or 3 months ago and now this issue is popping up. It boots up with a green screen when i turn it on at the moment, but then after it has warmed up the screen clears back up like normal. So that is why i figured that it is about time for a newer model laptop and where my researching and price comparing will come in down the line.
    If you have any other laptop suggestions for me to at least look at please tell me. I want at least 750 GB or 1 TB HDD and an Intel Core i5 or I7 Processor in these suggestions too, because i do heavy duty Video Editing and Processing for my website and for Video Game Video Walkthroughs and need not only the best Processor it can handle, but for website backups and for the space doing Webcam video recordings can handle too.
    Thanks for any suggestions you may have and if the current one i have linked is worth my time in saving for please be so kind as if to let me know that as well. I don't care if it has a Touch Screen or not. But any suggestion for research is always welcome.

    The RAM of my HP Pavillion Dv4-2164us model is currently 4, but it is starting to boot up with a green screen when I first start it. So I am thinking about going with the J020 Envy which is a 17 Screen display or I might go for this:
    http://www.bestbuy.com/site/envy-touchsmart-17-3-touch-screen-laptop-8gb-memory-1tb-hard-drive/18203... if I go 4th gen Intel Core i7 Processor and Touch Screen
    The next thing after I save up after getting whatever next Laptop I buy will be a Cooling Pad and an External HDD that I can put into one of the USB Ports or where ever you hook them up so that I can backup it up for a rainy day as they say.
    The only reason why I am not opting for the becoming popular SSD is the Price tag to get the amount of space I would need is still out of my price range if I got one included. I have to be realistic and on budget as much as I don't want to be.
    If I went 4th gen I5 I might get something like this:
    http://www.bestbuy.com/site/envy-17-3-laptop-8gb-memory-750gb-hard-drive/2354033.p?id=1219072210771&...
    I would have shown a 15 screen laptop, but the CD/DVD Combo drive is not included in any of them. I would need one to back up my new laptop's OS and files the first week I use it to save from having to reformat or reinstall stuff if things even got messed up.
    I have been thinking a lot about all of this not like it was a just now knowing this type of thing either. I have known for some time about that. Thanks for trying to help too.

  • In the market for a new laptop..

    Hi everyone,
    i am currently in the market for a new laptop and seeking some advice.
    I am debating between getting a basic rMBR 15' 2.4 GhZ 8/256 model and MBR 2.3 GhZ 4/500. The price for the basic rMBR 15' 2.4 GhZ 8/256 model is 1,867 euros with Apple's friends and family discount i am getting (stock price is 2250 euros here in Ireland). MBR 15' 2.3 GhZ 4/500 starts at 1850 euros and i am not getting friends and family discount off that (don't want to go into details). In any case this isn’t the sort of cash I have lying around.
    Apple’s rMBP is a wonder of modern engineering, there is no doubt about that. What i am concerned about is all the software that has to update to add higher res images which takes time and a lot more space because they are effectively doubling the size of the image and my general browsing experience where buttons, logos and anything affected by Photoshop’s “Save for the Web” setting will look blurry or pixelated. This is certainly not the kind of experience I am looking forward to after spending 2k on a laptop.
    I'm not a heavy user also I like to take my stuff around with me and I do a little Pro Tools and Logic once in a while.
    Any thoughts are appreciated.

    What you were told is not correct. Apple doesn't care where your music originated and nothing will be "blocked", but you can only sync your iPhone to one device at a time.
    When you first connect your iPhone to a different Mac or PC, you will see a dialog similar to the following (substitute iPhone for iPad - the result is the same):
    It will do exactly what it says. If you "Erase and Sync" the iPhone will be erased first. So, make sure whatever music you have on the iPhone is stored someplace else first. Transfer that music to your new Mac's iTunes Library, and then sync your iPhone to it. You will lose nothing that way.

  • "I've made a huge mistake." The laments of a new mac pro and ridiculously slow AE renders

    I just purchased the late 2013 model of the Mac Pro with the following specs:
    Processor: 3.5 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon E5
    Memory: 12 GB
    Graphics: AMD FirePro D700
    It barely squeaks out a faster render than my early 2008 Mac Pro (which has the following specs):
    Processor: 2 x 3.2 Ghz Quad Core Intel Xeon
    Memory: 16 GB
    Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
    I obviously did NOT configure my new Mac Pro with the best features for AE CC.  I still have time to return the machine, and try again. I would appreciate advice from someone who can ID where I went wrong - and direct me toward a machine that will churn out faster renders. Thanks so much!

    Sorry, I'm out of the loop on the newer chipsets so would have to defer to others in that respect.  There's a lot of reading to be done on multicore rendering in after effects; but you're best off running some test renders to see if its helping or hindering your comps and then base your decision for number of cores vs core speed on that.  Either way multicore rendering does require a lot of RAM. You should be getting OK render speeds if you're not using the ray trace renderer, certainly should beat out the old box, that might be something to look into.
    I can't advise using those thunderbolt pcie chasis to add an nvidia card to the new mac pro trash can; the sonnet ones we bought have been finicky with our AJA cards and I can only imagine a full graphics card under load being worse performance wise.
    I built my hack a few years back on an ivy bridge i7 with 32 GB of ram.  They have some newer guides for hardware choices and methods at http://www.tonymacx86.com/home.php
    Although my build has been extremely stable, I will caution that putting together a hackintosh can be quite a pain even if you're an experienced system builder / knowledgable with *nix.  If Windows is an option that can be considered, I've heard good things about the HP Z series workstations but Quadro cards seem overpriced IMO compared to the Geforce series for the cuda cores / ram size (though purists will surely encourage you not to go the budget route).

  • Is it worth the upgrade to a new Mac Pro?

    I have a question about the new Mac Pro. I have a 1st Generation Mac Pro (the one released in 2006). I primarily use it to do a lot of motion graphics and video editing/effects. I use Final Cut Pro, Motion (I have FCS 2), After Effects, Cinema 4D, etc. Would it be worth upgrading to the newer Mac Pro? Would I notice much difference in rendering speeds, working with 3D, etc?
    My current Mac Pro has 5 GB of Ram, and the NVidia GeForce 8800 GT graphics card; 2 x 2.66 GHz Dual-Core Processors
    I'm really debating on selling my Mac Pro and purchase one of the 2009 Mac Pros but only if I would really notice much of an overall difference.
    Thanks in advance for any answers and input!

    Hi, it really depends on what you plan to do with the computer. If running windows in 64 bit mode is a worry for you, then I would trade your 2006 for at least a 2008 mac pro. The Harpertown mac pros are still considered by many just as fast as the 2009, if not faster in some things. Remember, it is hyper threading that gives the 2009 their power and the speed of 1066mhz DDR3 memory.
    If you plan on just using the mac pro for light video editing and encoding and using pro apps, the 2008 mac pro will be more than enough. I had a 2006 mac pro going from a G5 Quad. Once I found out that I really enjoy running windows on it and the thought of a new cinema display, I decided to trade my 2006 for the 2008. Sometime in the next few years, I will then trade up my harpertown for the Nehalem mac pro and so forth.
    You are right! very few people these days have 2000+ dollars to spend outright on a computer, but I got a great deal on my 2006 trade which was 1850 - the 2008 3.0 harpertown for 2300.00

  • Prepare the drool cloths! New Mac Pro will make Aperture SCREEEAAAAMMMM!!!

    Shipping TODAY
    New Mac Pro
    1.6 -2.1 faster than current PPC Quad
    2.6 Ghz dual DuoCore
    256 MB ram
    Superdrive
    $2499
    All quad, up to 3ghz
    Up to 16 GB memory
    Up to 2 TB SATA internal storage with FOUR internal drive bays
    4 PCI Express slots
    Graphics up to radeon x1900 or FX4500
    HOLY SMOKES!!!

    Looks like a nice machine.
    Bit dissapointed with the graphics options though - in the PC world you can get dual on one card Nvidia 7950GX2 cards which would absolutely destroy anything you can get for this machine.
    I wonder if you could just buy a Radeon 1900XTX card and pop it in, if it would use the same drivers as the XT card.
    On the memory front does anyone know if it NEEDS ECC RAM? ECC ram is hideously expensive and I'd really want 4gb for aperture.
    CPU looks great and is actually very well priced, the Xeon's are very expensive chips.
    notice also the tech specs for the screens have increased, and prices dropped.

  • Is a SSD drive for a new Mac Pro "worth it"?

    I will be purchasing a new Mac Pro quad-core in the next month or so. My computer usage, other than email and some word processing, consists primarily of editing RAW photo files using Nikon Capture NX2, Photoshop Elements, and iPhoto. I do almost nothing with video. Would a SSD boot drive offer me any significant advantage over a 1 TB hard drive? Would it appreciably speed up photo editing of the RAW files, or simply boot faster? If you do recommend one, what size would I need for a boot drive to contain the OS and all program software? I will be upgrading from my current G5, so I suspect anything will initially seem very fast. Thanks!

    It depends on just how dependent on disk I/O your software is. Hard drives are still, by far, the slowest link in the performance chain for a computer. If your software is primarily CPU bound and goes to the hard drive very little, you won't notice the benefits of an SSD that much. I use Apple's Aperture, and Aperture is VERY sensitive to disk speed for the volume where your library file is. There are several key databases in the library package that are extremely sensitive to disk performance and particularly file fragmentation.
    I have an OWC Mercury Extreme SSD that I use for my operating system and applications, and then I have a RAID 0 of three Western Digital Hard drives for my Aperture library. RAID 0 is striping with no parity. Since there is no parity and no protection from hardware failure, I back up with TimeMachine, manual copies and I also use Mozy.com for automatic offline backups.
    The machine boots nearly instantly, and application launching is extremely fast. Most programs show a definite improvement and overall I am very pleased with the configuration.
    However, Aperture's library databases are extremely prone to fragmentation. There is a noticeable and significant increase in performance every time I defrag my aperture volume with iDefrag, and if I have a really long editing session I can notice performance degrading over time.
    Right now my workflow with Aperture is pretty sporadic, so defragmenting routinely isn't that big of an issue. However, I anticipate getting into Aperture more as I start photographing more projects. I think if that happens, I will probably get a second SSD and also finally convert my Aperture library from managed to referenced. Apple has added features in Aperture 3 so that referenced libraries aren't that big of a PITA, so I should be able to keep the Aperture databases on the SSD and reference my masters on my RAID drive. Best of all worlds.
    Also do not buy the SSD from Apple. Right now the only viable SSD's are ones that do internal garbage collection like the OWC Mercury Extreme. See my other post here for the ups and downs of SSDs:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=11248829&#11248829

  • How do I get pages 4 for my new mac pro?

    I have a new Mac Pro (running Mavericks) that comes packaged with the unusable Pages5.  I use Pages4 on my Macbook Pro and also want to use it on my Mac Pro.  Since it's no longer available for purchase, can someone please tell me how I can get a version onto my Mac Pro? 
    Thanks.
    lrf

    Yes you can.
    Purchase iWork '09 very cheaply from Amazon, less than $20, or migrate it over from an old System/Mac. Just make sure you update it to v 4.3.
    Peter

  • In the market for a new computer would love some feedback

    Ok so I have a dilemma,
    First problem is I can't decide between a laptop and a desktop if I went the laptop route I would go with the Asus N53qm
    Asus N53 Specs
    Its got i7 720qm, some sites have it with 740qm, ddr3 memory, 425m cuda video card,
    Id upgrade the ram to at least 8gb or ram maybe upgrade more down the road.... Id be editing video off esata or usb 3.0
    I see the advantage of having a laptop being able to work on the road, taking it to my bed....
    Id plug it into an external monitor/mouse, keyboard when at my desk.
    My other option I would be a desktop
    Specs would be,
    x58 motherboard, havnt decided which one yet, theres a lot that seem to all have the same features, eg. msi, asus, gigabyte.
    Again ddr3 memory I notices 2000 was not much more than 1333, so yea as much ram as I want down the road....
    GTX 470
    850 watt corsair
    Intel Core i7 950
    Thermaltake A60 Case
    Again most of my projects would most likely be through esata or usb 3.0 not sure which is better...
    Oh and I would be editing HD Video from a flash based camcorder, Cannon HSF 10 to be specific, so its .mts avchd
    Anyways, how much of a performance increase would I get from the desktop over the laptop?
    I notice a lot of people overclock, is that really necessary, isnt an i7 pretty fast stock?
    Thanks and please let me know your thoughts, advice changes to my specs...

    Would love some feedack from the experts on this config available at Tiger direct for about $1,000
    My Goal: to edit AVCHD footage using CS5....looking at the specs below specifically the processor, the video card and the RAM..what do you think?
    ( I  currently have CS3 on an HP Quad Core 2.4Ghz w/ 8GB RAM which is great for SD, but I realize that when upgrading to CS5 and editing my Sony HDR-500v AVCHD footage I'l need much more power)     Thanks!!
    Lenova Brand PC
    Specifications
      Condition:
    New
      Lifestyle:
    Entertainment
      Operating Systems:
    Windows 7 Home Premium 64-Bit
      Platform:
    PC
      Orientations Allowed:
    Vertical
      Colors:
    Black
    Red
      PS/2 Connectors:
    1 - Mouse
    1 - Keyboard
      USB Ports (Total):
    8
      Audio Out Jacks:
    3
    1 - Headphone
      Line In Jacks:
    1
      Microphone Jacks:
    2
      VGA Ports:
    1
      HDMI Ports:
    1
      S-Video Connectors:
    1
      S/PDIF Connectors:
    1
      Processor Brand:
    Intel
      Processor Class:
    Core i7
      Processor Number:
    860
      Processor Speed:
    2.80GHz
      Processor Interface:
    Socket 1156
      Processors Supported:
    1
      Processors Onboard:
    1
      Memory Type:
    DDR3
      Total Memory:
    8.0GB
      Memory Speed:
    1066MHz
      Hard Drives Included:
    1
      Hard Drive Types:
    Hard Disk Drive
      Interface:
    SATA
      Capacity:
    1TB
      Speed:
    7,200RPM
      Optical Drives Included:
    1
      Optical Drive Type:
    DVD±R/RW
      Optical Drive Class:
    DVDRW
      Supplemental Media Type:
    Card Reader
      Capacity:
    16-in-1
      Audio Description:
    Integrated Audio
      Channels:
    5.1 channel Surround Sound Support
      Graphics Description:
    Dedicated Graphics
      GPU/VPU:
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 320
      Video Memory:
    1GB dedicated
      Video Interface:
    HDMI
    VGA
      WiFi Chipset:
    Integrated
      WiFi Data Transfer Rate:
    up to 300Mbps
      WiFi Description:
    Wireless LAN 802.11 b/g/n
      WiFi Standards Supported:
    802.11b
    802.11g
    802.11n
      LAN Data Transfer Rate:
    10/100 Mbps
      LAN Description:
    Fast Ethernet
      LAN Interface Type:
    RJ-45
      LAN Ports:
    1
      Mouse Type:
    Optical
      Connection Type:
    USB
      Power Source:
    USB Connection

  • In the market for a new phone

    A strange topic you may think however, I'm still a pretty new mac user and want to know which phone to buy that has good compatability with my shiny MBP. IE will send texts from address book because I know the posh nokia with no keyboard doesn't. So if people would reveal what mobiles they've got and how they use them with their macs I'd be super greatful.
    M

    Hi Mcornes,
    I am waiting for Sony Ericsson to release the K610i. I prefer Sony Ericsson phones because they are usually well integrated with iSync, with all the features available.
    http://www.sonyericsson.com/spg.jsp?cc=gb&lc=en&ver=4000&template=pp1loader&php=php110389&zone=pp&lm=pp1&pid=10389
    Now I am using an old T610, but still syncs wonderfully with my Mac.
    I can't wait for the new model K610i!
    Gustavo

  • I am in the market for a new desktop.

    Sorry if this is convoluted.  I am currently doing my research on a new comp. and I am unfortunately over all over the map.  I have and love my 160gb ipod and my wife feels the same about her ipad.  What we dont share affection for is our all in one Dell.  I am looking for a multifuctional piece of equipment, most likely a desktop.  I would love the mobility or the ability to at least move around my house to do my thing rather than being confined to my home office, but this isnt a deal breaker either so I am for the most staying away from MBP unless someone points out some good sell points.  I am focusing on a desktop that can handle basic to intermediate home office usage as I occassionally do some work from home (Project Management Consultant).  I game some, mostly just World of Warcraft and perhaps some Sims or Sim City type stuff.  No first person shooters or anything extensive.  I also have a massive music collection which is why I am favoring going all out apple base to keep things smooth between the platforms.  The idea of having the ability to do some video editing is also intriguing for work purposes as well.  Also of course the basic usage for internet browsing.  I am hesitant to going the gaming desktop route because I dont feel i play enough of the high end games to justify going that route, but I do play WoW approx 10-20 hours a week give or take.  Can a iMac handle what I am looking for or should I look elsewhere.  The apple quality isnt an issue with me, I just need to know if this platform is right for what I need.  I appreciate anyhelp.  Also, I am approx 2 hours or so a away from the nearest apple store so talking to them isnt a possibility.
    Thanks,
    Shawn

    If considering an iMac, if your gaming activity is this many hours, I would look at the 27 inch screen model.
    Many people have complained about the iMac's stock 512 MB graphics card not being fast enough for WoW.
    So, you may have to opt to purchase some custom options such as the 1 or 2 GB VRAM video card.
    The stock RAM will not be enough for gaming, also.
    Instaed of buying the extra RAM from Apple, you can buy RAM cheaper from third party suppliers.
    Plan on installing, at least 12 GBs of RAM and consider installing 16 GBs of RAM.
    New iMacs can take up to 32 GBs of RAM. You can install more, at your discretion, at a later date if you feel you need it.
    But for gaming with WoW, 12-16 GBs should be enough.

  • What is the optimum core configuration for a new Mac Pro to process and manipulate very large (80 megapixel) images using PhotoShop and Camera Raw?

    Hello:
    I will be using creative techniques to process and manipulate a large number (hundreds) of very large (80 megapixel) images captured using a medium format digital back (Phase One IQ180).
    Final output will be digital fine art imagery printed using an Epson 11880 at large sizes (up to 60 inches x ?), retaining the highest possible quality and resolution. I will be using Adobe CC PhotoShop and Camera RAW as well as Capture One software. PhotoShop filters will be used extensively.
    The Mac Pro needs to be optimized for the above purpose and be useful for at least five years. I plan to max out all the other options (RAM, graphics cards, storage). Performance is more important than cost.
    The few discussions I have found that mention optimum core configurations seem to lean toward 6 or 8 (but likely are not taking into consideration my need for manipulating a large number of very large files), so I am looking to this foum for opinions.
    Thank you,
    Kent

    See if this helps
    http://macperformanceguide.com/index_topics.html#MacPro2013

  • Pulling the trigger on a new Mac Pro. Advice please.

    Okay, here we go. I am a freelancer who shoots in 1080i and 720p using a JVC 700 U camera with really good glass. in a small market. So bringing the media in is a piece of cake. I do not see me going to 2K or 4k anytime soon. I produce a weekly hour long sports program and various other projects... training, docs, marketing videos, etc. Very seldom more than 4 streams on the timeline. I have a budget of around $5,000 for a new machine. Here is what I am leaning towards. I would appreciate any advice.
    6 core, 32 GB ram, upgrade to D700 GPU's, 512 GB storage. I use two G-Tech 4TB Thunderbolt drives for media. I also have a Thunderbolt display. Any concerns or thoughts? You folks always have great advice so I am looking forward to your opinions.
    Cheers,
    Tom

    Thomas, Just a sugestion…why not also post this in the MP forum, where the emphasis is more on hardware. Not that you might not get some greatanswers here…more to diversify. ((I'd give an opinion if I were more up to speed with the MP…)
    Russ

  • Video card options for a new Mac Pro

    My G5 recently died on me and I am getting ready to upgrade to a Mac Pro. My question is regarding the video card options. I will be using Aperture 2, Photoshop CS2, and Final Cut Studio, but, not doing HD work. I am trying to decide between the ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB and the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT 512MB.
    As my G5 has stopped working, I was not prepared for an upgrade and I am trying to cut corners where I can. Does anyone have any experience comparing these two cards? Am I being to nitpicky about a $150 upgrade? My gut feeling is that I should not be questioning the extra cost and go with the NVIDIA, but, just want to make sure that I am not wasting money for a difference I will not see, as I do not play games on my Mac. Any opinions and input from other users is greatly appreciated. Thank you.

    Very interesting, I went to that link and then followed the one for Pro Apps:
    http://www.barefeats.com/harper10.html
    And, it states that the Radeon with less memory will consistently outperform the Nvidia on programs like Final Cut and Aperture. Guess I AM better off saving the money. Thank you for your direction!

  • I'm in the market for a new computer, but I need it to run Premiere Pro.

    So I'm a student wanting something small and portable to take to and from classes, but for my filming class, I need it to run Premiere Pro. I'm not too good with computers once it gets to system requirements for software and such, so any help would be great.
    My first option:
    Toshiba Satellite 11.6"
    Second option:
    HP Pavilion 11.6"

    1 - read the articles at http://ppbm7.com/index.php/tweakers-page
    2 - Laptop Video Editing PC - http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1369220?tstart=0

Maybe you are looking for

  • LR4 Flash Web Gallery Color Problems

    The color space on the selected images appears to be changing when I use the Lightroom flash gallery in the web module of LR4.1. This stays the same when the gallery is uploaded. In previous version of LR I have seen color changes in the web module b

  • Refreshing deski reports and saving in pdf format

    I am generating pdf from deski report. I am using BO-XI and Adobe Reader 8. When I am navigating through bookmarks on pdf ( charts and tables) view is zooming in. I have reset the Edit -> preferences ->page display -> page layout to 'single page cont

  • How to get result without single cotes in ''Cast(Multiset( '' Result.

    select cast(multiset(select column_name from user_tab_columns where table_name = 'DAILY_PRODN_MIS' and column_name like '%STOCK%' order by column_name) as tab_type) result from dual; RESULT TAB_TYPE('BAGS_STOCK', 'BLUE_DUST_STOCK', 'CEMENT_STOCK', 'C

  • Query in Table Maintanance Generator

    Hi, I have a query in table maintanance generator. In tables Extract and Total we have all the entries. Is it possible to get the entry which we made in the record. I mean i need the record in this i made the changes. I cant use above tqo tables beca

  • Constraint Error

    Table Name: Table_1 ID     INTEGER;     --     FK REFERENCE TO TABLE_2 NAME     VARCHAR2(100) NOT NULL OrderId     INTEGER NOT NULL; Table Name: Table_2 ID     INTEGER NOT NULL; OrderId     INTEGER NOT NULL; UNIQUE INDEX FOR (ID,OrderId); While Updat