I1111 & I1112 issue

Hi Experts,
SRM 5
SP15
Classic scenario
R/3 4.6c
I am facing the following issue -
User creates SC. After approval a PR should get created.
However, instead of this the status of the SC is I1111 - Item in Transfer Process. A follow on document number is generated but the follow on document is not created in the backend. The BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB table has the entry of the corresponding PR.
I have performed the following steps -
1. As per OSS 1480994 I executed BBP_ALERT_SB_NOTTRANSFERED
2. The SC status has changed to I1112 - Error in Transmission
3. I checked in the Application Monitor - and the SC is in the section - Not transferred to backend
    There is no reason mentioned
4. I select the SC and "Transfer Item Again" - Msg is Activity Successful
5. The follow on document ie PR is still not created in R/3
This is happening only for a few SCs and not all.
1. Please provide pointers on how this can be resolved.
2. Is there any standard report / OSS to delete entries from BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB
Regards,
Amish

Hello,
Check if RZ20 has any alerts related to follow on document craetion error.
Try to debug the transfer of shopping cart running FM BBP_PD_SC_TRANSFER.
Otherwise, check if note 1173815 helps you.
Regards,
Ricardo

Similar Messages

  • I1112 status of Shopping cart- Need to create a follow on document

    Hello Experts,
    I have one issue in which enduser had created a shopping cart and header status is approved but no follow on document is generated. at line item level the status is Error in Process.
    When i ran the report BBP_ALERT_SB_NOTTRANSFERED. then my Shopping cart status changed from I1111(item in transfer)  to I1112"error in transmission'..
    In Applicaiton monitor : the message is Not transferred to backend and Shopping cart 3100001911: Follow-on document(s)  not transferred. we are using Extended Classic Scenario and i dont know why we are getting this issue, we are getting this same issue only for 2 Shopping carts.
    Please guide me how i can repost the document so that follow on document will get generated.
    I am in ECS scenario with SRM 7.0
    Help will be appriciated.
    smriti

    Hi,
    If it is only the problem with only few carts, Check if any Short dumps are occuring in SRM as Well as in R/3.
    We faced a simialr situation and observed that it was resulting in a short dump due to bad coding in one BADI.
    regards,
    MRao

  • I1111 BBP_ALERT_SB_NOTTRANSFERED

    Hi,
    We are using classic scenario on SRM 4.0 (SRM Server 500)
    We had a recent system issue which caused some SC to be in status I1111
    We did run BBP_ALERT_SB_NOTTRANSFERED. But they do not go to status I1112.
    Also do not show up in alert monitor.
    Note the SC was created last month.
    The date in table BBP_CONTROL show todays date-time 20,080,930,100,840
    In BBP_PD,  BBP_PDBEI Object key shows PR Number that is not present in R3.
    We checked the cart thoroughly , vendor is assigned and no other errors.
    In BBP_PD there were no errors and the status is "Item In transfer Process"
    There is an entry in BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB
    Jobs CLEAN_REQREQ_UP is running fine.
    There are no authorization issue for RFC user.
    Can you suggest how to solve this issue?
    Thanks,
    Nikhil

    Hi
    Note 854478 - Alert monitor: No longer possible to transfer shopping cart
    Note 865797 - BBP_ALERT_SB_NOTTRANSFERED: Incorrect status set
    check these notes.
    Regards
    Muthu

  • Issue connecting SRM 7.01 to a R/3 4.5B back-end

    Guys,
    I need your help with the following. We are currently trying to connect a SRM 7.01 system to a R/3 4.5B back-end. We almost got everything working except for a small problem, maybe you can help. We are using the classic scenario and are creating purchase orders in the back-end based on a SRM SC.
    First question did anyone successfully connected a SRM 7.01 system to a R/3 4.5B back-end?
    The problem we are encountering is as follows. In customizing in SRM I have selected system type R/3_4.5B as the back-end system type in u2018define system landscapeu2019.This causes for the determination of driver FM B45A_PO_CREATE when SRM wants to create the PO in the back-end (BBP_PD_SC_TRANSFER  ).This action succeeds because the PO is created in the back-end.
    However, the next action of BBP_PD_SC_TRANSFER  is to read the data again from the back-end via FM B45A_PO_GETDETAIL. This synchronous call is done in order to update the SC status in SRM and create the linkages in BUS2121. This last action fails, because at the time the get detail Bapi is executed by SRM, the EKKO table in the back-end is not yet up to date and error u2018W5 107 purchase order does not existsu2019 is issued by the BAPI_PO_GETDETAIL in te back-end. This causes the SC in SRM to get status I1112 (error in process). Even though this status is issued in SRM, the PO is available in the back-end without any errors if I check this  via ME23.
    What I see is if I debug the SC transfer process and wait 1 or 2 seconds between the B45A_PO_CREATE and B45A_PO_GETDETAIL. The issue is not there. In this case it appears that the EKKO table is updated on time in the back-end and the B45A_PO_GETDETAIL can be processed in SRM without problems in order to update the SC status. I get status I1113 follow-on document created in this case.
    Thus my conclusion is there is a timing issue when connecting to a R/3 4.5B system. Does anyone know a solution. Our thought goes to a small enhancement in the B45A_PO_GETDETAIL FM creating a timer to wait a second before the execution and fetching of the data. I tried it and it worked. But of course I prefer a standard SAP solution. Did anyone experienced similar behavior? Or knows a standard SAP solution to this problem?
    Appreciate your help.
    Best regards,
    Skander

    Hi Surender,
    The code changes in this note only apply if the system type is u201CERP_Xu2019u201D. This is not the case over here, we are trying to connect to a R/3 4.5B system.
    Some additional info, we have multiple back-ends connected. All ECC back-end function correctly and for these we do not have the problem. Only for the very very old R/3 4.5B system.
    Any way I tried the note but no luck. This because of the above.
    Thx.

  • Status in BBP_PB   --------    I1111- Item in Transfer Process

    Hi all,
    I have seen lot of threads on this issue but non of them giving final soultion which leads to me create one new post....
    I am working with Extended classic scenario with SRM 4.0.
    I have created SHC which gone for approval and it has been approved by approver.
    Its a limit item. But still that shopping cart is not available in sourcing cockpit.
    I have checked BBP_PD where I found status of shc is I1111- Item in Transfer Process.
    Here I have checked all item as well as header tables but no entry found there.One thing is that source type is EP as well as Source_rel_ind is Y which means cpmleted for Sourcing but in actually there is no followon document created yet.
    Also I have gone through SM58 where I didn`t find any error.
    All batch jobs are also running properly.
    So could any one please let me know the solution for this...
    Regards,
    Navneet

    Hi,
    Pls see the foll threads.
    Re: Sourcing relevant indicator getting set to 'Y'
    Re: Carts sent to Sourcing Cockpit Even Though PO created
    BR,
    Disha.
    Pls reward points for useful answers.

  • Status I1112 "Error In Transmission"

    Hi Experts,
    I'm no technical expert in SRM but know a little on how it works.
    We're currently implementing an Extended Classic Scenario (SANDBOX) and done several pre-configuration to make everything works (simple SC creation)
    Current system we have is EP <> SRM 7.0 <> ECC 6.05.
    The scenario we have now is 1 step shopping cart approval. What I understand for an extended classic scenario is that SC is created/approve in SRM and PR is created/approve in ECC (Is PR created manually once SC is created/approved or automatically created?). Then PO is created (when PR is sent to SRM??).
    RFC configuration settings are working. Logical systems in SRM and ECC is maintained. Queues are registered.
    Activated Activate Hierarchies for Product Categories, Suppliers, and Contracts (both int proc and ext: set as always for the time being)
    Applied several notes that are applicable to current support package: 1498793, 1499352, 1514713, 1517301, 1641325. All packages are up to date both ECC and SRM (SRM_SERVER - SAPKIBKV10; SRM_PLUS - SAPKIBK210; SRM_EXPL - SAPK-70009INSRMEXPL; SRM_EXT     700 - SAPK-70010INSRMEXT) . Still no luck after shopping cart is approved.
    Any hints or suggestions on what to do to make at least one SC into successful?

    Hello,
    As you are in Extended Classic Scenario, Shopping Cart created will give a Purchase Order as follow-on document in SRM.
    Then, when approval workflow is finished for this SRM PO, purchasing document (PO) will be replicated to backend system.
    Check OSS note below:
    [1641325 - Shopping Cart status 'Error in transmission' with PO created|https://websmp109.sap-ag.de/~form/handler?_APP=01100107900000000342&_EVENT=REDIR&_NNUM=1641325&_NLANG=E]
    You can also check all OSS notes dealing with status I1111 ('Item in Transfer Process'), I1112 ('Error in transmission') and I1113 ('Follow-on Document Created').
    Analysis/correction reports Z_SC_STATUS_CHECK_XX are given with those OSS notes.
    Regards.
    Laurent.

  • SC status stuck in I1111 Item in Transfer Process

    Hi Friends
    We're using SRM 7.0 SP03.
    I got a question about SC status update, let me describe it with an example:
    1) firstly, i found a SC became Error in Process due to some data problem;
    2) then, i reprocessed it in Application Monitor by click the button of "Create Follow-on documents";
    3) when checking it in BBP_PD, i found this SC item status became I1111 Item in Transfer Process, and looks like it stuck in this status for a long time(more than 5 or 6 hours);
    4) the second day, i found it turned to status I1112;
    Here comes my question, what activity updated this SC's status from I1111 to I1112?
    I tried program CLEAN_REQREQ_UP and BBP_GET_STATUS_2, i believe this change was not updated by this two programs, and I checked almost all batch jobs running in my system, nothing found.
    It has been bothering me in the past month, what's the mechanism of this status update?
    Could anyone give me a clue, i'll highly appreciate, thanks.

    Hi Nikhil
    I read this notes before, program BBP_ALERT_SB_NOTTRANSFERED only include SC after a certain time. My error SC is an old one, created several weeks ago, I checked the time stamp in table BBP_CONTROL, I think this SC is not include in BBP_ALERT_SB_NOTTRANSFERED run.
    Btw, about program BBP_ALERT_SB_NOTTRANSFERED, there's a default parameter:
    "Add. Time for CLEAN_REQREQ_UP             7,200"
    What's this used for?

  • Shopping cart with  I1111 - Item in Transfer Process.

    Hi All,
    I have a shopping cart in our Production system with 5 line items, all had the status "I1111 - Item in Transfer Process". I have run report BBP_ALERT_SB_NOTTRANSFERED and 4 out of 5 items have changed the status from "I1111 - Item in Transfer Process" to "I1112 - Error in transmission". We could delete 4 line items but the first line item is still with the same status "I1111 - Item in Transfer Process" and we are unable to delete it from the system.
    There is no alert in the Monitor also.
    Is there any suggestion to delete this line item? because the USer has already created a new shopping cart for all these lines and we need to delete this old one.
    Any help appreciated.
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    please do a last try with the report BBP_ALERT_SB_NOTTRANSFERED. This selects only the SCs, which were created since the last execution; the last execution is controlled by a time stamp in the table
    bbp_control.
    In the table bbp_control you will see an entry like this: 20.090.519.225.722 (which means 2009.05.19. 22:57:22 ). Please turn back this time stamp (hard in the debugger) before the creation date of the SC, and execute BBP_ALERT_SB_NOTTRANSFERED once again.
    Is this SC item still not selected, the easiest way is to set the deletion indicator on the database level.
    Regards,
    Peter

  • Shopping Cart in Status I1112 - No PO created

    Hi people,
    We are facing a problem in EBP system:
    Some shopping carts got in "Error in Transmission" status.
    When cheking BBP_PD transaction, I can see:
    Status         Description                    Inactive
    I1111          Item in Transfer Process       X
    I1112          Error in transmission          
    The document was not created in R/3.
    If I check RZ20 transaction I can see the message:
    Monitor            Shopping Basket\Backend application errors                          
    Date               14.05.2008                                                          
    Time               21:11:45                                                            
    Message ID         BBP_ADMIN 016                                                       
    Message text       SC &1 (PO &2): &3                                                   
    Argument 1         0012836535                                                          
    Argument 2         6200459551                                                          
    Argument 3        BAPI 001 - No instance of object type has been created. External reference                 
    Argument 4         00000000000000000000000000000000                                    
    No Dumps in EBP.
    No Dumps in R/3.
    After this, if I use the function module "BBP_REQREQ_TRANSFER" to transfer the SC, it works perfect!!!
    I cannot understand!
    What does happen when I approve a shopping cart and the document cannot be generated in R/3 ? EBP system tries again? How? It is something related to SPOOL_OBJECTS job?
    Thanks a lot,
    Cristiana

    Hi,
    See the foll threads for the related settings:
    BAPI 001 No instance of object type PurchaseOrder has been created.External
    No instance of object type PurchaseOrder has been created. External referen
    Also can you see any entries in the table BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB for your SC?
    Also check whether the job CLEAN_REQREQ_UP is properly scheduled in trascn SM37.
    BR,
    Disha.
    Do reward points for  useful answers.

  • New DVR Issues (First Run, Channel Switching, etc.)

    I've spent the last 30 minutes trying to find answers through the search with no luck, so sorry if I missed something.
    I recently switched to FIOS from RCN cable in New York.  I've gone through trying to setup my DVR and am running into issues and was hoping for some answers.
    1.  I setup two programs to record at 8PM, I was watching another channel at the time and only half paying attention.  Around 8:02 I noticed a message had popped up asking if I would like to switch channels to start recording.  I was expecting it to force it to switch like my old DVR, but in this case it didn't switch and I missed the first two minutes of one of the shows.  I typically leave my DVR on all day and just turn off the TV, this dual show handling will cause issues with that if I forget to turn off the DVR.  Is there a setting I can change that will force the DVR to choose one of the recording channels?
    2.  I setup all my recordings for "First Run" because I only want to see the new episodes.  One show I setup was The Daily Show on comedy central, which is shown weeknights at 11pm and repeated 3-4 times throughout the day.  My scheduled recordings is showing all these as planned recordings even though only the 11pm show is really "new".  Most of the shows I've setup are once a week so they aren't a problem, but this seems like it will quickly fill my DVR.  Any fixes?
    Thanks for the help.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    I came from RCN about a year ago.  Fios is different in several ways, not all of them desirable.  Here are several ways to get--and fix--unwanted recordings from a series recording setup.
    Some general principles. 
    Saving changes.  When you originally create a series with options, or if you go back to edit the options for an existing series, You MUST save the Series Options changes.  Pretty much everywhere else in the user interface, when you change an option, the change takes effect immediately--but not in Series Options.  Look at the Series Options window.  Look at the far right side.  There is a vertical "Save" bar, which you must navigate to and click OK on to actually save your changes.  Exiting the Series Options window without having first saved your changes loses all your attempted changes--immediately.
    Default Series Options.  This is accessed  from [Menu]--DVR--Settings--Default Series Options.  This will bring up the series options that will automatically be applied to the creation of a NEW series. The options for every previously created series will not be affected by a subsequent modification of the Default Series Options.  You should set these options to the way you would like them to be for the majority of series recordings that you are likely to create.  Be sure to SAVE your changes.  This is what you will get when you select "Create Series Recording" from the Guide.  When creating a new series recording where you think that you may want options different from the default, select "Create Series with Options" instead.  Series Options can always be changed for any individual series set up later--but not for all series at once.
    Non-series recordings.  With Fios you have no directly available options for these.  With RCN and most other DVRs, you can change the start and end times for individual episodes, including individual episodes that are also in a series.  With Fios, your workarounds are to create a series with options for a single program, then delete the series later;  change the series options if the program is already in a series, then undo the changes you made to the series options later; or schedule recordings of the preceding and/or following shows as needed.
    And now, to the unwanted repeats. 
    First, make sure your series options for the specific series in question--and not just the series default options--include "First Run Only".  If not, fix that and SAVE.  Then check you results by viewing the current options using the Series Manager app under the DVR menu.
    Second, and most annoying, the Guide can have repeat programs on your channel tagged as "New".  It happens.  Set the series option "Air Time" to "Selected Time".  To make this work correctly, you must have set up the original series recording after selecting the program in the Guide at the exact time of a first run showing (11pm, in your case), and not on a repeat entry in the Guide.  Then, even it The Daily Show is tagged as New for repeat showings, these will be ignored. 
    Third, another channel may air reruns of the program in your series recording, and the first showing of a rerun episode on the other channel may be tagged as "New".  These can be ignored in your series if you set the series option "Channel" to "Selected Channel".  Related to this, if there is both an SD and HD channel broadcasting you series program, you will record them both if the series option "Duplicates" is set to "Yes".  However, when the Channel option is set to "Selected Channel", the Duplicates Option is always effectively "No", regardless of what shows up on the options screen.  
    As for you missing two minutes,  I have sereral instances in which two programs start recording at the same time.  To the best of my recollection, whenever the warning message has appeared, ignoring it has not caused a loss of recording time.  You might have an older software version.  Newest is v.1.8.  Look at Menu--Settings--System Info.  Or, I might not have noticed the loss of minutes.  I regularly see up to a minute of previous programming at the start of a recording, or a few missing seconds at the beginning or end of a recording.  There are a lot of possibilities for that, but the DVR clock being incorrect is not one of them.  With RCN, the DVR clocks occasionally drifted off by as much as a minute and a half.

  • Pension issue Mid Month Leaving

    Dear All,
    As per rule sustem should deduct mid month joining/leaving/absences or transfer scenarios, the Pension/PF Basis will be correspondingly prorated. But our system is not doing this. In RT table i have found 3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00.
    Employee leaving date is 14.04.2010. system is picking pension amout as 541. Last year it was coming right.
    Please suggest.
    Ashwani

    Dear Jayanti,
    We required prorata basis pension in case of left employees and system is not doing this. This is the issue. As per our PF experts Pension amount should come on prorata basis for left employees in case they left mid of month.System is doing prorata basis last year but from this year it is deducting 541. I am giving two RT cases of different years.
    RT table for year 2010. DOL 26.04.2010
    /111 EPF Basis              01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /139 VPF Basis              01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3F1 Ee PF contribution     01/2010                    0.00           1,050.00 
    /3F3 Er PF contribution     01/2010                    0.00             509.00 
    /3F5 Ee Mon PF contribution 01/2010                    0.00           1,050.00 
    /3F6 Ee Ann PF contribution 01/2010                    0.00          12,600.00 
    /3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,00 01/2010                    0.00              96.25 
    /3FA PF basis for Ee contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00 
    /3F4 Er Pension contributio 01/2010                    0.00             541.00
    /3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    /3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
    /3R3 Metro HRA Basis Amount 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    1BAS Basic Salary           01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    RT table for year 2009. DOL 27.10.2009
                                                                                    /111 EPF Basis              07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
    /139 VPF Basis              07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
    /3F1 Ee PF contribution     07/2009                    0.00           1,082.00
    /3F3 Er PF contribution     07/2009                    0.00             628.00
    /3F5 Ee Mon PF contribution 07/2009                    0.00           1,082.00
    /3F6 Ee Ann PF contribution 07/2009                    0.00           8,822.00
    /3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,00 07/2009                    0.00              99.18
    /3FA PF basis for Ee contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00 
    /3FC Pension Basis for Er c 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00 
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00 
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00 
    /3R4 Non-metro HRA Basis Am 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13 
    1BAS Basic Salary           07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13 
    Now please suggest what to do. where is the problem  ? If have also checked EXIT_HINCALC0_002 but nothing written in it.
    With Regards
    Ashwani

  • Open PO Analysis - BW report issue

    Hello Friends
    I constructed a query in BW in order to show Open Purchase Orders. We have custom DSO populated with standard
    datasource 2lis_02_itm (Purcahse Order Item). In this DSO we mapped the field ELIKZ to the infoobject 0COMP_DEL
    (Delivery completed).
    We loaded the data from ECC system for all POs and found the following issue for Stock Transport Purchase orders (DocType = UB).
    We have a PO with 4 line items. For line items 10 and 20, Goods issued, Goods received and both the flags "Delivery
    complete" and "Final delivery" checked. For line items 30 and 40, only delivery indicator note is issued for zero
    quantity and Delivery complete flag is checked (Final delivery flag is not checked) in ECC system. For this PO, the
    delivery completion indicator is not properly updated in the DSO for line items 30 and 40. The data looks like the
    following:
    DOC_NUM     DOC_ITEM       DOCTYPE     COMP_DEL
    650000001       10     UB        X
    650000001       20     UB        X
    650000001       30     UB
    650000001       40     UB      
    When we run the Open PO analysis report on BW side this PO is appearing in the report but the same is closed in ECC
    system.
    Any help is appreciated in this regard.
    Thanks and Regards
    sampath

    Hi Priya and Reddy
       Thanks for your response.
                         Yes the indicator is checked in EKPO table for items 30 and 40 and delta is running regularly for more than 1 year and no issues with other POs. This is happening only for few POs of type Stock Transport (UB).
                        I already checked the changes in ME23N and the Delivery completed indicator was changed and it reflected in EKPO table. Further, i checked the PSA records for this PO and i am getting the records with the Delivery completed flag but when i update from PSA to DSO the delivery completed indicator is not updating properly.
                       In PSA, for item 30 i have the following entries. Record number 42 is capturing the value X for ELIKZ but after that i am getting two more records 43 and 44 with process key 10 and without X for ELIKZ. I think this is causing the problem.
    Record No.    Doc.No.                    Item              Processkey         Rocancel     Elikz
        41               6500000001            30                    11                            X           ---    
        42               6500000001            30                    11                            ---           X
        43               6500000001            30                    10                            X           ---
        44               6500000001            30                    10                            ---         ---
    (Here --- means blank)        
    Thanks and Regards
    sampath

  • HP LaserJet Enterprise 600 M602 driver issue

    Hello,
    I've got issue with 600-series printers. We use the latest UPD drivrer ver. 61.175.1.18849 and print from XenApp 6.5. The error occurs every time when users try to print jpg files from XenApp session. It only happens with 600 series printers and UPD.
    Also I've tried to assign native 600-series driver ver. 6.3.9600.16384 and it works good. But with that driver system says that it's color printer and it brokes our printing reports. These reports are very important for us. So we can't use printer and that driver as well.
    Printer installed on Windows Server 2012 R2. All clients are Windows 7 x64. XenApp Servers are Server 2008R2.
    Is it possible to get fixed UPD driver or correct native driver for Server 2012 R2?
    Regards,
    Anatoly

    I am sorry, but to get your issue more exposure I would suggest posting it in the commercial forums since this is a commercial printer. You can do this at Printers - LaserJet.
    Click on New Post.
    I hope this helps.
    Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
    Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!
    Gemini02
    I work on behalf of HP

  • Windows 7 displays error message when exiting +cursor issue

    Two issues here. CS5 Phoshop on Wind 7 64 bit.
    Physical processor count: 8
    Processor speed: 3073 MHz
    Built-in memory: 12279 MB
    Free memory: 9577 MB
    Memory available to Photoshop: 10934 MB
    Memory used by Photoshop: 80 %
    Image tile size: 128K
    First issue is since the latest automatic Adobe update (why fix what isn't broken?) Every time I now exit Photoshop I get the message "Adobe QT Server has stoped working" and occasionally it happens when I exit bridge. Indesign is also behaving badly. I can no longer start a previous document from file manager without ID crashing out.
    The other is the cursors in Clone and erase lose their edge (become invisable) for no reason - well not quite. Noise Ninja crashed Photoshop when I tried to use it. I reinstalled it and all is well. The cursor issue seems to be intermittant but came back (for no reason) after I reinstalled NN. I can't seem to change the cursor, no matter what I do. The problem is now seriously affecting how I work. Almost enough to go back to Win XP which ran CS5 Photoshop flawlessly.
    Any help will be gratefully accepted.
    Doug

    function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
    doug87510 wrote:
    The recent problem is the entire outline of the cursor (including the crosshair in the middle) was missing at any size of cursor. All I had was exactly what I'd get if I used a real spraygun.
    Well, that issue is simply a matter of hitting the Caps Lock key.  When Caps Lock is on, you'll see the cursor outline, and when it is off you'll see a crosshair.  That's a feature, not a bug.
    Glad to hear the 11.1 drivers are out.  I will download them and try them now myself.
    Regarding "Adobe QT" crashing...  QT brings to mind QuickTime, though that is Apple, not Adobe.  Do you have Apple QuickTime installed?
    Regarding memory usage, with 12 GB of installed RAM, you should be able to set Photoshop to use 90% or more in Edit - Preferences - Performance.
    -Noel

  • Issue in Creation of Periodicals for Contracts in CRM7.0

    Hello,
    I have a requirement to create Contracts in CRM7.0 system.
    And I am doing this using the BAPI *BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTI*
    Good part is Contract Order gets created, but onlywith Header Details.
    The issues i am facing --
    1. I need to know what kind/type of data must be passed to the interface parameters, the F1 Help/Documentation is vague.
    2. I am passing data in the INPUT FIELDS structure with the Object ID, Handle Number, Reference GUID and Fieldname,
        here what does 'Logical Key' field indicate? What should be passed here.
        What does 'REFERENCE KIND' field indicate, i have been passng 'A' for everything (to be frank i dont know whats its significance is!!).
    3. With so much, My Order gets created but with less than half details, i.e. the Objects not getting created are -  Partner, Product, terms/appointments, Status, LongTexts......
    Any help/inputs would be appreciated.
    Hope my problem is stated clearly ...
    --Regards
    Dedeepya

    Hi Anu,
    i found my solution by debugging with existing data or while creating it in CRMD_ORDER.
    Ensure that you are passing a correct entry in INPUT_FIELDS structure.
    As i haven't worked on rebates i woudlnt be able to help you, I suggest you debug to arrive at a solution.
    You can preset your break-points at :-
    1. FM - CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN
    2. CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN_MULTI_OW -- Debug through the complete FM.
    3. CRM_ORDER_PREPARE_MULTI_OW -- The data is set in this function module.
    Regards
    Dedeepya C

Maybe you are looking for

  • Cannot uninstall sql server 2012 on Windows 7

    This is the error a co-worker gets when trying to uninstall SQL Server 2012. She is running Windows 7 Professional Service Pack 1, 64 bit OS. She had SQL 2008 installed and then installed 2012 Enterprise as well, because she needed it for a project.

  • Why won't my computer connect to my wireless printer (HP Photosmart 7520)?

    Ever since getting the printer, my laptop has always been able to send things to the printer with absolutely no problem. As far as I know, it works because the printer is connected to the same wireless network as my computer. However, none of my coll

  • No picture when contacts call.

    When I call someone I get a little tiny picture that I assigned the contact up in the corner. But when the contact calls me , no picture shows up. I would like for their picture to take up the screen. I have a iPhone 4. I am on iOS 7.1.2.

  • Blocked my account on Skype after breaking my akku...

    Hello! My account is blocked! Akkuant customer service has been restored but I can not call anyone! money in the account is! (about 10 euros) asking you to unblock my account. respect ....... dvov13

  • Same flash sound on every html page

    Hi, i´ve a problem on site that i´m doing, ineed to put a background flash music/sound on all the pages, but i don´t want the sound to reload every html click/refresh. I know it should be possible by storing que sound position or legend on a veriable