IDOC type to send OPEN ITEMS per INVOICE to external system?
Dear EDI Experts,
we want to send OPEN ITEMS of a customer per document via EDI to an XML file.
We checked on idoc type CRESTA01 but this idoc type provides "only" the total OPEN ITEMS of a customer but NOT e.g the invoice document numbers.
Is there any way to generate an IDOC or XML file with the invoice numbers and its OPEN ITEM amounts?
We want to transfer that data to an HH device in order to show customer which invoices yet to be paid.
Any idea?
Many, many thanks
Regards
JW
Hello,
many thanks for the quick answer to my question.
We want ONE credit idoc per one customer showing all OPEN ITEMS with the document number.
That info is sent to the Handheld in order to provide customer exact info which invoice he has not paid yet.
We do not need ONE idoc per ONE document.
But it seems no standard idoc provides such info and we have to call a FM to provide that info to a Z-Segement of CRESTA01. Is that correct?
Port definition XML in we21 for idoc type is understood.
Thanks a lot
Regards
JW
Similar Messages
-
Any Idea Which Message type/Idoc Type should be used for FI Invoice
Hi Experts,
Any idea what message type/Idoc type should be used for FI invoice. We are going to send IDOC from R/3 to Non-SAP System using ALE. We are using T-codes FV60/FV65.
Thanks,
SonyHi Sony,
I never dealt with FI IDoc.
I think you need to setup EDI outgoing payment in IMG. Please take look this report <b>RFFOALE1</b> - ALE Distribution of Payment Data and <b>RFFOEDI1</b> and check also the program documentation.
Hope this will help.
Regards,
Ferry Lianto -
How can I design a BPM with mulitiple IDOC types as sender
Hi Experts,
I am using PI 7.1
I have a senario that I have to design a BPM in such a way that I will get different IDOC types as sender while the receive step has to trigger the the respective IDOC types at run time.
For example: when matmas is the IDOC the BPM instance have to trigger only the respective Abstract interface at runtime.
In my senario I have 5 IDOC TYPES which should pick the related one using a single Abstract Interface in the same design( one BPM ).
Is this possible. Please suggest me how can I do this if possible.
Regards
Shankar.Hi,
you could work with multiple receive steps that triggering the process.
Similar to the example pattern in SAP Basis BpmPatternSerializeMultipleTrigger
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/77/0737133012b24b9d0a12c6df2b1054/frameset.htm
In the fork step you could set the number of required branches to 1 that means only one receiving IDoc is required to leave the fork step.
Regards
Patrick -
Function or bapi returning customers or vendors with open items per plant
Dear experts.
may you please tell me which function or bapi can i use that will return all customers or vendors with open items per given plant. i have tried to use BAPI_AR_ACC_GETOPENITEMS and BAPI_AP_ACC_GETOPENITEMS but they return open items for a given customer and vendor respectively per given company code.ok but those 2 BAPIs return open items after providing the customer or vendor. what i need is a BAPI which returns a list of customers or vendors with open items
-
How to obtain FI Open Items per Project
Hi Folks,
How can I obtain FI Open Items per Project.
I know FBL1N. But I need a function module or something
I want to write a program and therefore I need to read FI Open Items
per Project.
Any Suggestions for Function Module or something?
Thans
RegardsHi, not fbl1n but FAGLL03, bcs you need G/L accouts,
Check treat How to include pernr field to FAGLL03 -
Possibility of grouping open items per business partner during FPY1
Hello all,
In my test case, I have a business partner that is connected to two contract accounts.
On each connection I have two open items, so four in total.
When executing the payment program (FPY1), I would like to group the open items per business partner into 1 payment that goes to the bank.
Can you tell me whether this is possible and, if so, how to implement it?
Thanks in advance!Hi,
If I've got you right, there are several open items posted on different Contract Accounts. Let's assume a simple case. There are two Contract Account Relationships to one and the same Business Partner:
CA1-BP1 and CA2-BP1. BP1 is the holder of CA1 and CA2. In parallel BP1 is the only premium payer. There is no further Business Partner involved.
Additionally there are two Insurance Objects with relationships - each - to one and the same Business Partner: IO1-BP1 and IO2-BP1.
The first Insurance-Object-Relationship IO1-BP1 is assigned to CA1, and the second Insurance-Object-Relationship IO2-BP1 is assigned to CA2.
In FS-CD standard it's possible to group and summarize several open items on Business Partner level within a Payment Run (FPY1) cross different Contract Accounts. Therefore follwoing master data is required:
IO1-BP1: “IO: Settings Active for Contract Account” is set active
IO2-BP1: “IO: Settings Active for Contract Account” is set active
Master data in CA1-BP1
Incoming Payment Method "1" (example for Direct Debit)
Bank Details ID for Incoming Payment Method "0001" (example for 1st Bank Account of BP1)
Master data in CA2-BP1
Paid By [in 'Payment Data (General)']: "CA1" (means the number of Contract Account CA1, as Contract account used for payment transactions)
The challange is to populate initially or change these attributes from an external system properly, for instance from a Policy Management system, a Claims Management system, or an Incentive & Commission Management system. In many cases they have neither an understanding of the concept "Contract Account", nor capabilities to adjust or maintain FS-CD master data. Thus, it could be efficient to build specific UIs dedicated to such scenarios - intended to set the attributes properly.
If, and only if a payment aggregation, consoldiation or summarization is required regularly cross different Contract Accounts <without using FS-CD transfer postings and without using FS-CD Broker Collection>, it can be wise to create a dedicated Contract Account with relationship to the Payer (or Payee) as the relevant Business Partner for incoming or outgoing payments - initiated by the insurer.
It's a special ContractAccount-BusinessPartner-Relationship CAx-BPy that just holds the payment method and bank details ID as master data. This Business Partner is acting as Payer in Payment Transactions. If, and only if this Business Partner "BPy" differs from the relevant Business Partner "BP1" that is linked to the Contract Account, and is also the relevant Partner within the posted open items, than Partner "BPy" is the alternative business partner to the contract partner; used for clearing and paying the items of the contract account. Overall that's a powerful workaround for payment aggregation, consoldiation or summarization cross different Contract Account, even the Business Partner "BPy" is a different one. Under this precondition one has to feed the two fields
Payer [in 'Payment Data (General)'] with BPy
Paid By [in 'Payment Data (General)'] with CAx
In addition: within all subordinated InsuranceObject-BusinessPartner-Relationship master data the flag “IO: Settings Active for Contract Account” has to be set active. Therefore the InsuranceObject-BusinessPartner-Relationship master data doesn't control payments anymore, but the ContractAccount-BusinessPartner-Relationship master data.
Please test and let me know.
Best regards,
Jochem -
Incorrect IDoc type ZSBB010 in the ALE defintion of the source system.
Hi,
We have done client copy of BW production system into BW test system.
I am getting following error while checking Test R/3 system in BW Administrator workbench.
Diagnosis
Incorrect IDoc type ZSBB010 in the ALE defintion of the source system.
System response
Error when sending data to BW.
Procedure
Enter IDoc type ZSBB017 .
Ring any bell.. Thank you for Ur time..
Cheers
SenthilHello Senthil,
Please check WE20 transaction and look for idoc type there.Most likely you need to make some corrections in there. Also check BD64.
Regards.
Ruchit. -
Incorrect Idoc type ZSPA065 in the ALE definition of the source system RSAR
Hi Experts,
Incorrect Idoc type ZSPA065 in the ALE definition of the source system RSAR 373 error is coming .
Some one suggested note no 886102 but i went inside i did not find correction or code for implementing please any body suggeste for rectifying this error.
Please tell correct aproach for solving the issue.Hi,
there is some problem with your RFC connection
just go to WE20 T code and expand partner type LS
here search your r/3 system and click on that here you can find the details of idoc
if you are not able to correct yourself you can contact basis team for that.
just go to RSA1--> using the conxt menu doa check of Source system you will get the error message
just send the screen shot of the same to Basis team they will take care of the same.
Br
santosh -
Incorrect IDoc type ZSWA003 in the ALE defintion of the source system.
Hi !
When I triggering the load from BW it is giving me an error Incorrect IDoc type ZSWA003 in the ALE defintion of the source system.
When I am checking the connection in source system with R3 system , it is giving me this error and asked me to Enter IDoc type ZSWA011 .
Please tell me how to do this.Hi,
I assume that the source system has been copied fom production onto quality-system (or somothin likely).
To solve that, plase refer to the oss-note 886102.
https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1kZSZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=886102
https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/886102
Hope that helps.
cheers
Sven
Edited by: Sven Muntermann on Mar 26, 2009 6:21 PM -
Incorrect IDoc type ZSBC052 in the ALE definition of the source system
hi guyz,
i am getting the following error while checking the source system in bi.
Incorrect IDoc type ZSBC052 in the ALE definition of the source system RSAR 373
please guide through your expertise.
regards,
raps.Hi,
Check the below given thread,
[Source System Check Problem;
[Incorrect Idoc type ZSPA065 in the ALE definition of the source system RSAR;
Regards,
Durgesh. -
RFC Error:The BW IDoc type ZSBA011 is not the same as the source system
Hi Experts,
RSA1Source System (Context Menu) Check
I am getting the below error
<b>The BW IDoc type ZSBA011 is not the same as the source system IDoc type ZSBD012 </b>
What might happened wrong.When i checked with my Basis Consultant who is new to job,Replied every this is ok with regeards to RFC.
Where should i check to correct the error
ThanksHi,
Did you do a system copy for BW ?
Try a restore (rightclick on your source system) in most cases this will solve the problem.
If not check the notes below:
184322 Procedure after DB copy of BW source systems
886102 System Landscape Copy for SAP BW 2.X, 3.X and NW2004s BI
325470 Activities after client copy in BW source systems
325525 Copying and renaming systems in a BW environment
184754 Procedure after BW database copy
184447 Building a BW-system landscape
184971 Notes on BW source system connections
140276 Error in source system assignment
524554 Storing destinations in the BW environment
538052 Maintenance of Myself destination in BW
Regards, Patrick Rieken
Message was edited by:
Patrick Rieken - BI-Formance B.V. -
Standard IDOC type for Posting Open AR items(Similar to FB01 posting)
Hi,
I need to know if there is any standard IDOC type that can be used to post the incoming open AR items into SAP.
The below are the fields that are coming into the SAP.
Header:
BLDAT DATS 8 Document Date
BLART CHAR 2 Document type
BUKRS CHAR 4 Company Code
BUDAT DATS 8 Posting Date
WAERS CUKY 5 Currency Key
XBLNR CHAR 16 Reference Document Number
BKTXT CHAR 25 Header Text
Line item data:
BSEG BSCHL CHAR 2 Posting Key
BSEG "KUNNR "Customer Number
or
LIFNR" CHAR 10 or Vendor Number"
BSEG WRBTR CURR 13.2 Amount in document currency
BSEG ZTERM CHAR 4 Terms of payment key
BSEG ZFBDT DATS 8 Base Line Date
BSEG ZUONR CHAR 18 Assignment
BSEG RSTGR CHAR 3 Reason Code
Line Item data: tax amounts
BSEG BSCHL CHAR 2 Posting Key
BSEG HKONT CHAR 10 G/L (Tax) Account Number
BSEG WRBTR CURR 13.2 Amount in document currency
BSEG FWBAS CURR 13.2 Tax Base Amount
BSEG MWSKZ CHAR 2 Tax Code
BSEG PRCTR CHAR 10 Profit Center
Thanks
ShivaHi
Try
FIDCCP02 or FIDCC*
Regards
Neha -
Residual cleared item - per invoice
Hi All -
In F-28, in residual process, how can residual clearing per invoice be achieved ?
Is this possible?
Any ideas... Appreciate a response...HIi,
you can create residual payment per invoice, at the time of posting in F-28 select process open item there selct the invoice and click on residual paument and enter the remainig balance in Residual item column Eg invoice amount is 1000 recevied amount is 250. enter remaining 750 in residual item, the system will clear total 1000 and it will create a new line item for remaining balance 750
entree
40 Bank A/c 250 Dr
06 customer account 750 Dr
15 Customer account 1000 Cr
Regards
Babu -
Std Msg Type and Idoc Type to send multiple characteristics for equipment
Hello Experts,
I have the requirement to send all the assigned characteristics linked to an Equipment or linked to a Material, along with the all possible values BUT require only standard Message Type and Idoc Basic Type.
I found Message Type = CHRMAS and Idoc Type = CHRMAS04, BUT it contain information of ONLY one characteristic, not solve my objective (multiple characteristics in one Idoc)
Will you please provide me any standard Message Type and Idoc Basic Type that solve my above requirement?
Thanks in advance,
akgHello Experts,
Can you at least tell me, is there anything standrad that can fulfill my above requirement?
If not then I will proceed with custom developments; and in this case is there any complexity to transmit the custom Idoc?
Thanks in advance,
Thanks & Regards
akg -
Clearing of Open items (per Vendor)
Hi All,
I would like to ask if there is a way to show multiple line items of a single vendor as multiple line items and not the sum of these line items during clearing in F-04.
Right now, when clearing multiple line items of a single vendor, these line items will appear as one single item during simulation with the lump sum of all the line items being cleared. Is there a way of showing these items separately?
Ex.
User wants to clear Vendor 2000000000.
Open items for vendor 200000000 are as follows:
document 1 with amount 100
document 2 with amount 200
document 3 with amount 300
When clearing in F-04, user will select these three documents to clear.
During simulation, posting will be as follows:
DR VENDOR 200000000 AMOUNT 600
CR CASH AMOUNT 600
Is there a way of showing it this way?
DR VENDOR 200000000 AMOUNT 100
DR VENDOR 200000000 AMOUNT 200
DR VENDOR 200000000 AMOUNT 300
CR CASH AMOUNT 600
Thanks! Would appreciate your answers soon.Hi,
The client requirement is that each time the user clears multiple line items of one single vendor or customer, separate line items will be displayed for each line item cleared.
If you use f-04 and clear multiple line items for a single customer or vendor, these line items are lumped into one line item.
Ex.
Doc. 1
Dr. Customer 1 100USD
Cr. Sales 100 USD
Doc 2
Dr. Customer 1 200 USD
Cr. Sales 200 USD
Upon clearing, two open items will be selected, the one with 100 USD and another one with 200USD,
Postings will be as follows:
Dr. Sample Account 300 USD
Cr. Customer 1 300 USD
Would it be possible if the posting of the clearing is
Dr. Sample Account 300USD
Cr. Customer 1 100USD
Cr. Customer 1 200 USD
Thanks.
Edited by: pinoy sap on Sep 23, 2008 11:29 AM
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to configure purchase requistion in third party sale pls send me detail
dear expert how to configure purchase requistion in third party sale pls send me details. waiting your valuable reply vicky
-
Oracle 9i on Redhat 7.1 - relink problem
While installing 9i on my RH7.1 linux box i've problem with relink - installation process faled with error on processing file ORACLE_HOME/plsql/lib/ins_plsql.mk in section install. What's wrong ? P.S. Sorry, my english too bad :-)))
-
Why does my App store just keep loading?
I love how Apple notifies you that they are changing your password. And then you can't even update your Apps. Leave it to Apple to screw things up yet again.
-
Change default display profile (colors are horrible)
Hi there, A few weeks ago I baught a 15" Macbook Pro, but then I noticed the colors were horrible. Way too much brown/gray. I'm not exaggerating. Compared to my normal monitor it look's awfull, and compared to other Macbooks too! So I tried to make m
-
Preview Pane in Safari after upgrading to Snow Leopard
Safari 4.0.3 no longer shows attachments previews. This is only since upgrading to Snow Leopard. So, for example, if I am trying to attach a jpg, unless I know the specific name I can't preview it to make sure it is the correct one. The pane will not