Image size doubled ?

Can someone explain to me why my image size is doubled when it is exported from LR3 to PS5?
Edit in PS5 - Tiff -16bit -240 res -Compression - none

function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
Kenaston wrote:
raw file in LR3 2592x3872
Arrives in CS5..... Image size w-2592 h3872
As I mentioned, there are MANY different measurements.
Focus on the pixel count.  That hasn't changed.
Photoshop's little status window, for example, shows you the MB size that's often used to describe images in pro photographic circles (as in "our service accepts only 20 MB images and larger").
Additionally, if you're comparing raw file size on the disk, keep in mind most raw files are compressed.
Just keep working as you have been, and like I said, keep an eye on the pixel counts (H x V).
-Noel

Similar Messages

  • Why are Image Export Sizes Doubled when using Save vs. SaveForWeb&Devices?

    Hi Folks
    Maybe I'm missing something here ...
    I have 2 versions of an action I use to batch process images. One uses the Save As dialogue and the other uses SaveForWeb&Devices. However, the image sizes created using the latter are about 50% smaller than those created with the former. The two actions differ only in the Save step - I duplicated the original and swapped the save step in the action.
    Is SaveForWeb&Devices usign a more efficient optimisation algorithm or am I missing something?
    The reason for using the Save As dialog is that Batch Processing is able to override the save location, whereas I had trouble overriding save location in a batch process which used an Action that Saved using SaveForWeb&Devices.
    Cheers
    Richard
    P.S. I also find this size doubling takes place when using the Image Processing script supplied with PS. I'm on PS5 on OSX10.6.8.

    SfW throws out redundant custom data, when the normal JPEG save does not. Using the normal save e.g. also retains clipping paths (10 years ago people used that al lthe time for print stuff) and of course also more info on color management, user metadata and what have you. Therfe may bne more specific optimizations in SfW, but that's something Mr. Cox can probably answer better...
    Mylenium

  • Problems with image sizes

    There seems to be lots of confusion about image sizes and Apple iBookstore Support  et al simply state that images should not be greater than 2 megapixels.
    IBook Author Help > Photos and other images,  states:-
    Important:  When you export your book for distribution outside the iBookstore, images are automatically scaled to a width of 2048 pixels, which is optimized for iPad with Retina display. Readers can view these images on other iPad models, but the viewing experience might be slower. You can improve the viewing experience on iPad models without Retina display by using images no wider than 1024 pixels.
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5117 states:-
    Publishing to the iBookstore:
    If most of your readers will be using the original iPad, scale down images in Interactive Image widgets to a width of 2048 pixels and all other images to a width of 1024 pixels.
    Previewing on iPad, or exporting for distribution outside the iBookstore:
    You can improve the viewing experience on iPad models without Retina display by scaling down images in Interactive Image widgets to a width of 2048 pixels and all other images to a width of 1024 pixels.iBA help deals with exporting  books OUTSIDE the store and simply advises that you can  help none Retina viewers by having a smaller image.  No help at all really - but suggests that the use of images 2048 is OK. that would indicate 2048 x 1536 or 1496. No mention of what resolution should be used.
    iBookstore support basically reapeat this. 
    So  to ease life in getting books accepted,  should we all use 1024 x 768 @72ppi for iPad & iPad 2 and now iPad mini. ????
    and use 2048 x 1536 @ ??   for The New iPad Retina display!
    Both fail to mention HOW the books author would know which iPad a buyer/viewer will be using.  Also if "we" only use 1024 x 768, those with Retina do not get an "enhanced viewing experience".
    For a company that deals entirely with  devices that use logical programming - there seems very little logic  applied when it comes to dealing with a section of their business which by issueing iBA Free and wacking 30% of the top, must be adding to the $billions already stacked away in a corner somewhere.
    iBA makes eBooks for use/display on iPads only. For months now since iBA  became available, one of the  most common requests on this forum is help with....image sizes.
    It seems reasonable  now when Retina is in use and eventually the iPad and iPad 2 will fade away - ditto the new none retina mini and ALL Apple devices and  computers will be retina. So why not plan now!  Surely images in shoudl be geared to deal with Retina displays. IF  Apple would  take that line maybe  "Support" would have less work dealing with requests for help about images IF Apple accept that the next Stephen King may not have a clue how to deal with adjusting images sizes and simply state the required dimentions.
    I make photo books and use 2048 x 1496 @150ppi - so far ten free books have gone into the store.
    The suggestion about  images  for retina display as "standard" as been  sent as feedback.

    For all those who are still confused by Apples image restrictions / requirements...
    In the new Template chooser after the recent updates is "Antique". This template has a Chapter background image ( the olde world print of sailing ships in blue litho print style ). This print when opened in PS is 2771 x 1506 @72ppi. 2771x1506=4,173,126 pixels.This implies  Apple supply a book which does not comply with its own requirements!
    Higher  image resolution applied to printed photo inmages, make the image sharper. If for example you wanted to print a wall poster 45inches  wide, the  image needs needs a higher resolution to cater for the size, BUT the same image used for a 45" poster will print 4.5" wide print on your own printer!
    iBA full page is deemed to be 1024 x 748. resolution from Apple is 72ppi. An image with those specifications will be OK in iPad & iPad 2 - but not so sharp on a Retina display especially if zoomed larger on screen
    Now it seems 2048 x 1496 - double the original image size is suggested for Retina.
    You  can change an image in PS i.e. 1024 x 748 and change resolution to 144. PS will double the pixel size as you change the resolution. OK, just change pixel sizes back to 1024 x 748 and reolution is now 144.
    That indicates a sharper image which will be suitable for retina display and in fact all current iPad models.
    Today my 11th photo book was notified as available  in the iBook Store, all my images were pre-formatted at 2048 x 1496 @ 150ppi.   ( 2048 x 1496 = 3.063,808 pixels!)
    During delivery there were no issues flagged and after delivery no tickets.
    So I suggest all those folk pondering images sizes follow my example, which  is now proved to be accepatble!
    One thing puzzles me though, I dont use all images as full page and  they can  be masked down to - say - 250 x 200.  Should  just  make an image to fit the size I  want to display ??

  • IE incompatible ? Image size.

    Hi,
    I know very little about HTML, CSS and the like but as a photographer I upload gallery webs all the time for clients etc. I generate these in PS CS2 or iView MediaPro and then upload to my server (shared web hosting).
    With a current project requiring a 'site' type environment I decided to try iWeb. Before visiting this site please note that due to image sizes with iWeb it's a bit on the heavy side and if you're using IE on a PC BEWARE of crashes! Safari may even crash as has done with me.
    http://www.kura-images.com/camping
    Remarks and problems :
    1. As you can see my site does not resemble any iWeb template - using the 'modern' template I basically threw everything away and designed from scratch. It's a great WYSIWYG appli in that sense - no code - just drag and drop, resize, add some effects etc. I published regulary to a folder as a way of double checking but was impressed with the 100% WYSIWYG capability of iWeb
    2. Image size is a MAJOR problem. My concerns are specifically with the gallery pages generated from the photo page temps. Thumbnails at 16ko is too big and the motor that generates the large image files uses a single parameter (800pixels largest dimension) that cannot be changed in any pref settings etc. It also uses a compression factor which is a tad too high. Using Image Ready or the PS gallery web function (driven by Image Ready) I can get as good visual quality for my web-optimised JPEGS for 65% of the file size.
    Note : I tried this file swap as a test
    I changed one image in the folder for the "activités" page (activities_008) - I made a smaller thumbnail in ImageReady and created a 600pixel version of the large file; I replaced the images in the folder with these and checked the site. The thumb appears no problem in a smaller size (btw 6ko vs 16ko - that's a big diff when you apply it to 250 images !). SlideshowJS however has instructions to open the image at main size as determined by the slideshow index file creation generated by iWeb. And that's written as 800pixels. So on opening the 600 pixel image I'd replaced, slideshowJS opened it to 800pixels (not pretty). The only way to rectify that was to go into the source code in the relevant 'activités' js file, find the codeline for the image 008 and change the values manually. And I'd have to do that with 250 line of code ! That rather defeats the prupose of having a nice easy application to produce your galleries.
    3. Upload to my server via Transmit was trouble-free. No problems publishing to a non .mac server.
    4. Problem with the page titles. The names you give to pages determines the URL. Any spaces means you get the %20 thing and if, like me, you're writing in French the accents mean that iWeb has to get around the problem in a different, and not very practical, way. iWeb creates a random character line as a name, and uses that as the URL for pages where accents appear in the title. When the assets and index page are published those long character names appear on the index file and folder.
    I also think that may lead to compatability issues with certain servers.
    5. But here's the BIG PROBLEM !
    I had 4 people with PC's and IE (God bless 'em) check out the site. 2 reported repeated crashes of IE (unexpectedly quit exe. error). No problems with the homepage - just when clicking on some of the photo pages. What is really strange is that neither had problems when accessing the 'La Soirée' page, but both had problems with all the others. Apparently the crash came after IE tried to load the page, succeeded in loading a few thumbnails and then stopped and crashed 5-10secs later.
    6. EVEN WORSE !
    I have gone back to my site several times, emptying Safari cache each time, and have succeded in stalling definitively Safari's attempts to load certain pages. Just stops with partial page upload. I then have to quit Safari and re-open to be able to access any web page (even other sites). Sometimes it's OK, sometimes not.
    This site goes officially live on wednesday morning but for now it's a no-goer. Just too erratic and not IE compatible.
    PLEASE, any suggestions ?
    Many thanks in advance
    Peter
    G5 2Ghz   Mac OS X (10.4.5)  

    4. Problem with the page titles. The names you give
    to pages determines the URL. Any spaces means you get
    the %20 thing and if, like me, you're writing in
    French the accents mean that iWeb has to get around
    the problem in a different, and not very practical,
    way. iWeb creates a random character line as a name,
    and uses that as the URL for pages where accents
    appear in the title. When the assets and index page
    are published those long character names appear on
    the index file and folder.
    I also think that may lead to compatability issues
    with certain servers.
    Yes, it is best to avoid spaces and accents and special characters if you can. If you must have them in your navigation links, then don't use the iWeb nav bar. Instead give your pages very short simple names with the Inspector, uncheck the box for "include in nav bar," and just create ordinary hyperlinks for page navigation. I don't know if this will help with IE compatibility, but it can't hurt.

  • Photoshop CC not displaying correct image sizes, among other issues.

    Hey, so I'd like a bit of help here!
    I got my new laptop from the school a couple of weeks ago and photoshop’s been funky ever since I got it. It’s a brand new Macbook, and it's running Photoshop CC.
    First things first, it won’t recognize some of the brushstrokes I make. It will show that I've made them, but they won’t show up in the history panel. I'll have to make another stroke for it to register both of them. (Making undoing things a real pain.) Also, some of the keyboard shortcuts I use won't work in a really similar way. If I go to switch to my brush by pressing b, it occasionally won't register it unless I make an additional brush stroke. This works with all of the other shortcuts I use.
    In addition, file sizes are all kinds of messed up. Here’s the most recent example. The image dimensions are 500px x 135px, 300DPI, 8bit, RGB color. This is at 100% zoom. Those are the settings I normally use, but for some reason it’s showing the file as about half of the size it should be. (Tumblr post for comparison—they are 500px wide.)
    Here’s another example. This one is 1254 x 1201, 300DPI, 8bit, RGB, shown at 100% zoom. The image size is 4.31M. If I go to double the size and change nothing else, the image size jumps up to a whopping 17.2M. I don’t feel like that’s right? I don't remember any other versions of Photoshop having images be that large.
    Maybe it’s my computer settings? Right now I have the resolution set on "best for display," but even if i use the "scaled" option and change sizes, the images are still too small.
    I don't know if I would be able to uninstall and then re-install Photoshop because the school has control over those sorts of things and there are certain programs that you cannot remove. I've tried restarting the program as well as the laptop, but neither of those helped.
    if anyone can help me, I’d really appreciate it! Thank you!

    For generic performance and trouble-shooting advice I’d like to recommend reading these:
    http://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/kb/optimize-performance-photoshop-cs4-cs5.html
    http://blogs.adobe.com/crawlspace/2012/07/photoshop-basic-troubleshooting-steps-to-fix-mos t-issues.html
    As for the specifics:
    The image size is 4.31M. If I go to double the size and change nothing else, the image size jumps up to a whopping 17.2M.
    If you double the dimensions of an image the area is increased fourfold – so what is the problem there?
    The image dimensions are 500px x 135px, 300DPI, 8bit, RGB color. This is at 100% zoom. Those are the settings I normally use, but for some reason it’s showing the file as about half of the size it should be. (Tumblr post for comparison—they are 500px wide.)
    The introduction or Retina (and other high resolution) displays and browsers actually up-scaling images to accommodate those screen resolutions seems to have confused some users about the concept of pixels.
    Could you please post a full size screenshot on this Forum of the image at View > 100% in Photoshop and on tumblr?

  • Opening jpgs as raw... image size

    My office color corrects thousands of images per day for newsprint. These come in mostly as jpgs and some tifs and eps files. Most of these need a lot of color correction work, and I've found that opening jpgs with the RAW dialogue box and tweaking them there can be a huge time-saver (one menu with a bunch of sliders, versus opening curves, shadow highlight, hue/sat, color balance, etc.)
    However! There are two things preventing us from utilizing the ability to open jpgs and using the raw dialogue box:
    1. Image size. We are dealing with images from several customers who need us to maintain their original image size and dpi, whatever that may be. Other customers want us to maintain the width/height and rasample the image down to 200dpi. (example: take this 3x5" @ 956dpi and make it 3x5" @ 200dpi) If I open one of their images in raw, I don't know what the original width/height were because the file has been resized to whatever I used on the last image. I've noticed it defaults to 240. The original jpg dpi changes with each image we get. Is there any way to make the raw dialogue box not change the image size? Which leads me to...
    2. Once I've opened a jpg using the raw dialogue box it will always open up again in raw (always changing the image size.) If I want to just open my jpg as a regular image in photoshop, I have to go to camera raw preferences and disable the ability to use raw on jpgs. Is there a faster way to ignore the raw settings on a jpg once it has been altered as raw?
    So this is why we don't use raw, even though it'd be a huge advantage for us to be able to make these color corrections. If anyone has any ideas how to get around these, or even an easier workflow, I'd appreciate it!

    For #1, if you look at the image in Bridge you can note the dimensions and resolution...you would then need to put that same resolution in the ACR resolution field.
    For #2, no...as you note the ACR Preference controls whether or not Camera Raw will be used to open the image. You can use the Shift key when double clicking in Bridge to open the image directly into Photoshop and bypass the ACR dlog, but Camera Raw will still be used if it's set to be used in the Preferences...
    You'll need to keep your image resizing just in Photoshop because Camera Raw is not designed to do that sort of resize/resampling...it's designed first and foremost as a raw processor and later added the ability to open and process camera JPEGs and TIFFs. Putting those kind of controls into Camera Raw wouldn't make sense since the end result of an image opened into Camera Raw is supposed to be an image processed and opened into Photoshop. So, what you are wishing for is really outside of the scope of the development design...sorry.

  • Image size vs zip for reducing

    I am not looking forward to open up files/mouse up to image size/type up the required 800x600 a million times, and I just discovered control/compress . My camera has, in the 2 sizes of the smallest set of  JPEG, the larger @ 2784x1856 is a 728 KB which gets zipped to 712 KB. Being mathematically challenged,  I can only tell that a little size is lost with respect to the 800x600 that I am allowed to by the recipient, from the fact that I can manually compress to 800x600 and get a better 1.2 MB.
    In the next larger JPEG, the same 2784 X 1856  is a 2.6 MB which is zipped to 2.5, and I need to check the image size in pixel, VERY IMPORTANT for the recipient. It probably will be  about double than the smaller, but would the pixels exceed too much the 800 x 600, should I give up compress altogether, and do it manually? And by the way, how do I open a zip file? And above all, can it be used for pict?

    Thank you PZ.
    I particularly liked the part of your answer where you said viable wait time will  "depend on your target audience and their connection speed."
    I have a custom cabinet shop.
    A big part of my customer base finds me from a google search and fortunately for me,  when they are about to embark on a kitchen remodel they are very motivated to learn everything they can.
    I understand now that all referenced images are downloaded,
    What about linked pages?
    If I parse the images out to several pages would this enhance overall download speed?
    That last question is probably premature.
    I should first research the link you provided.
    Thanks again.
    Jarvis

  • Image size locks system

    When I select Image and them image size the cursor changed to a double square and I can't do anything  .... why is that?

    BOILERPLATE TEXT:
    Note that this is boilerplate text.
    If you give complete and detailed information about your setup and the issue at hand,
    such as your platform (Mac or Win),
    exact versions of your OS, of Photoshop (not just "CS6", but something like CS6v.13.0.6) and of Bridge,
    your settings in Photoshop > Preference > Performance
    the type of file you were working on,
    machine specs, such as total installed RAM, scratch file HDs, total available HD space, video card specs, including total VRAM installed,
    what troubleshooting steps you have taken so far,
    what error message(s) you receive,
    if having issues opening raw files also the exact camera make and model that generated them,
    if you're having printing issues, indicate the exact make and model of your printer, paper size, image dimensions in pixels (so many pixels wide by so many pixels high). if going through a RIP, specify that too.
    etc.,
    someone may be able to help you (not necessarily this poster, who is not a Windows user).
    a screen shot of your settings or of the image could be very helpful too.
    Please read this FAQ for advice on how to ask your questions correctly for quicker and better answers:
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/419981?tstart=0
    Thanks!

  • How to make Image/size/resolution agree with metadata resolution?

    After scanning the help file a bit and searching thru this forum a bit with `metadata resolution' as search criteria, I'm still pretty confused about how it is supposed to work.. I may have never actually found the right part of the help file.
    Cutting to the chase: How can I make the resolution reported by the metadata tab for resolution agree with what is reported inside photoshop at Image/size resolution.  I didn't see any way to set how res is reported in bridge.
    I see many pictures reported in metadata as 72 ppi for resolution and  reported in photoshop as 200 pixel/inch
    They do BOTH mean pixels per inch right?  If so, or really even if they don't how can I get the two reports to show the same resolution?
    There are too many processes that depend on knowing res in advance of opening a file for that to be so far divergent.

    Jingshu Li wrote:
    Some JPG or Tiff with Camera raw settings will be opened in ACR firstly when you double click them. In ACR workflow option (the bottom in the ACR dialog) the resolution value isn’t same with that in Bridge (metadata panel). If you go ahead to open the image in PS by clicking ‘Open Image’ button in ACR dialog and then check the image size from Image -> Image Size in PS, the resolution will be same with ACR (actually it is changed by ACR).
    If disable ACR support for JPG and Tiff in Bridge (Open Camera Raw Preferences in Bridge and choose ‘Disable JPEG support’ or ‘Disable TIFF support’ for ‘JPEG and TIFF Handling’), JPG or TIFF files will be opened by PS directly and the resolution matches between Bridge and PS. I believe this is an ACR bug.
    So what file types are you using and if they’re opened by ACR firstly in your workflow?
    The files are *.jpg.   But I don't see where camera raw comes in.  These are common jpg files.  I'm opening them by double click in bridge.
    Any way I did disable jpg and tiff in the Camera Raw preferences as you suggested.  At Jpeg and tiff handling, both disabled. and restared bridge.
    However, I see no improvment.
    For example, a file reporting 72 ppi in bridge when opened in photoshop ... Images/size resolution reports 480 pixels/inch.
    There is obviously some kind of miss handling that has been done to these files for them to have such a high resolution.   I suspect they may have been handled at Walgreens or Walmart... or similar since I had something very similar happen to me once when I had a bunch of pictures developed at Walgreens and they cam back with resolutions like that, when I know the camera would have given them something way less.
    But I don't see how any of that should be effecting Bridges  inability to get the resolution right.
    Here is another example: some.jpg
    It appears that bridge is showing an unusually huge file size in inches, to account for the reported 72 ppi.
    Bridge:
    Size: ...............1.14mb
    Dimensions:.....1496x1064
    Dimensions in
    inches ............20.8x26.7
    Resolution: .....72 ppi
    ===========================
    Photoshop:
    pixels
    Width 1496
    height 2064
    Document size
    inches
    width  4.987
    height 6.88
    Resolution 300
    Do you have further suggestions?

  • UIImageJPEGRepresentation increases image size

    HI , Am picking images from device photolibrary , and compress them using UIImageJpegCompression , but some images are doubled in size then the original image , say the original image is 5mb , then the compressed image size increases to 15mb , why so??
    NSData *imageData = UIImageJPEGRepresentation(imgFromPhotoLibOrCamera, .95);
    increases image size?
    Thanks in Advance.

    Yes. I don't optimize before importing and have iWeb's option turned off. I have a tutorial on using Web Site Maestro: Old Toad's Tutorial #12 - Using Web Site Maestro to Publish to MobileMe.. It's a little dated but can help you a little. The WSM help file is very good.
    You need to create a folder on your HD to publish to, I have one called WSM Input. In that folder put another folder for your site but don't have it the same name. Call it "Folder for Site_Name". Publish to that and never delete any of the files that get created in the "Folder for Site_Name". If you do than all edits and publish site changes will result in all pages getting published and WSM will not be able to optimize and upload just the changed pages. It will have to upload the entire site and you definitely want to avoid that.
    WSM does a very good job, IMO, of uploading to the server. I use MobileMe and it uploads much faster than I could upload using the Finder but that shouldn't be any surprise. The Finder is the best uploading client for an iDisk.

  • Raw image size 2.147 Gb?

    Hello,
    Is there a dng specification raw image size limit? I would like to save huge raw images. We changed the kMaxImageSide from 65000 to 300000. I know the dng's which are bigger then 65000 per size can't be opened in other dng readers. But also if you just have a raw image 30000x30000 it can be bigger then 2.147Gb. It's depends on bits per pixels. For now we have images like 7500 x 60000, but soon we want to save raw images like 7500 x 314169 or better 7500 x 628328. That means for the first image we have raw image data like 4.4Gb and for the other 8.8Gb. Of course this is just possible on a 64bit system.
    Is there any plan to support huge raw images (64bit dng sdk)? If so when will you release it?
    Best regards,
    Marius

    For #1, if you look at the image in Bridge you can note the dimensions and resolution...you would then need to put that same resolution in the ACR resolution field.
    For #2, no...as you note the ACR Preference controls whether or not Camera Raw will be used to open the image. You can use the Shift key when double clicking in Bridge to open the image directly into Photoshop and bypass the ACR dlog, but Camera Raw will still be used if it's set to be used in the Preferences...
    You'll need to keep your image resizing just in Photoshop because Camera Raw is not designed to do that sort of resize/resampling...it's designed first and foremost as a raw processor and later added the ability to open and process camera JPEGs and TIFFs. Putting those kind of controls into Camera Raw wouldn't make sense since the end result of an image opened into Camera Raw is supposed to be an image processed and opened into Photoshop. So, what you are wishing for is really outside of the scope of the development design...sorry.

  • How do I make Firefox retain the image size of the display. Each time I move sites I have to resize image.

    How do I get Firefox to retain the image size. Each time I change web sites I have to resize the image to get it all in the window. I open them full screen.
    == This happened ==
    Every time Firefox opened
    == New Computer, just downloaded Firefox Windows 7

    See:
    http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Text+Zoom
    http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Page+Zoom
    http://kb.mozillazine.org/Zoom_text_of_web_pages
    http://kb.mozillazine.org/browser.zoom.siteSpecific
    Add-ons:
    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6965 (the one I use)
    http://urandom.ca/nosquint/
    <u>'''''Other Issues'''''</u>: ~~red:You have installed plug-ins with known security issues. You should update them immediately.~~
    <u>'''You'''</u> ~~red:<u>'''MAY'''</u>~~ <u>'''need to Update Adobe Reader for Firefox (aka Adobe PDF Plug-In For Firefox)'''</u>: your ver. N/A; current ver. 9.3.3 (important security update release 06-29-2010; see: http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb10-15.html)
    ~~red:Check your version here~~: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/plugincheck/
    See: http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Using+the+Adobe+Reader+plugin+with+Firefox#Installing_and_updating_Adobe_Reader
    ''<u>You may be able to update from the Adobe Reader installed on your system</u>'' instead of going to the Adobe site and downloading. Start > Program Files, find and click Adobe Reader to open, click Help, click Check for Updates.
    ''<u>If you go to the Adobe site to download the current Adobe Reader:</u>''
    -'''<u>use Firefox to download</u>''' and <u>'''SAVE to your hard drive'''</u> (save to Desktop for easy access)
    ~~red:-See the images at the bottom left of this post to see the steps to take on the Adobe site~~
    -exit Firefox (File > Exit)
    -check to see that Firefox is completely closed (''Ctrl+Alt+Del, choose Task Manager, click Processes tab, if "firefox.exe" is on the list, right-click "firefox.exe" and choose End process, close the Task Manager window'')
    -double-click on the Adobe Reader installer you just downloaded to install/update Adobe Reader
    *<u>'''NOTE: On Vista and Windows 7'''</u> you may need to run the plugin installer as Administrator by starting the installer via the right-click context menu if you do not get an UAC prompt to ask for permission to continue (i.e nothing seems to happen). See this: http://vistasupport.mvps.org/run_as_administrator.htm
    *'''<u>NOTE for IE:</u>''' Firefox and most other browsers use a Plugin. IE uses an ActiveX version. To install/update the IE ActiveX version, same instructions as above, except use IE to download the ActiveX installer.
    *Also see: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Adobe_Reader ~~red:'''''AND'''''~~ [[How do I edit options to add Adobe to the list of allowed sites]]

  • Resizing within layer? Playing with image size?

    Help! I have been searching FAQs and tutorials for hours. I used to be able to click and drag an image to change it's size while in the layer without having to specify a numeric value, just simply clicking and dragging then when happy with the size double clicking. I just upgraded to CS4 and can't find that option.
    Also how can I rotate just one of many layers in an image, using the rotate tool, it rotates all layers at once!

    I cannot identify with your past experience in Photoshop, perhaps you were referring to some other application  In Photoshop consider the following approach to both resize and rotate. Press Ctrl + T and a bounding box appears around the elements in the active layer. pull on a corner to resize, or
    pull on a corner with the shift key held down to resize proportionally.  If you hover just beyond the corner point you will see small curved arrows indicating the ability to rotate. Click and drag to rotate (just that layer) when the curved arrows appear.  Finish off any of the above transformations by hitting enter. Hope this helps.
    Paulo

  • Canvas size relative to Image size

    I'm using Photoshop Elements 5.0. Windows XP. First post to this forum.
    I'm trying to add a frame in artwork. When I add the frame, is the image resizing or the canvas resizing? In former post: http://www.adobeforums.com/webx/.3c05a367 they suggest to crop the image. However, when I do that, I'm resizing my image. How do I add a border without losing resolution or making my image smaller?

    Glenda,
    Glad that it helps with your project.
    There are 2 concepts involved, as I see it.
    1. One can established a permanent resolution via Image>resize>image size.
    Let us assume that you open a picture file from your camera with
    width=31.778 inches
    height=23.7787 inches
    resolution=72/px/in. Note that this metric is in inches, not pixels, for this drill.
    now change resolution to 325px/in. Then
    height=7.04 inches
    width=5.268 inches
    The absolute values may be different for your files, but the principle is the same: as the pixels count goes up, the picture size, in inches, goes down - inverse relation. Try it out in your program.
    2. The frames take up real estate, if you will. If you buy a frame for a picture, the outside dimensions of the framed picture will be larger that the paper picture inside. One can make the picture smaller in elements, compensating just enough for the real estate consumed by the frame, but that, to me, would become a nuisance.
    Unless there is important information at the edges of the picture (e.g.a sign), it is my experience that application of the frame is not deleterious. Note that in the layers palette there is an f icon in a circle. Double click this to adjust the bevel. Layer>layer styles>scale effects is an option which is quite handy.
    Ken

  • Calculating image sizes for ibookstore submission

    I have the new ipad...so all my graphics look great, but I am having a hard time finding the exact method for determining image size for a book I am submitting to ibookstore. Can anyone point me to a way to calculate the best and largest images for ibooks

    For all those who are still confused by Apples image restrictions / requirements...
    In the new Template chooser after the recent updates is "Antique". This template has a Chapter background image ( the olde world print of sailing ships in blue litho print style ). This print when opened in PS is 2771 x 1506 @72ppi. 2771x1506=4,173,126 pixels.This implies  Apple supply a book which does not comply with its own requirements!
    Higher  image resolution applied to printed photo inmages, make the image sharper. If for example you wanted to print a wall poster 45inches  wide, the  image needs needs a higher resolution to cater for the size, BUT the same image used for a 45" poster will print 4.5" wide print on your own printer!
    iBA full page is deemed to be 1024 x 748. resolution from Apple is 72ppi. An image with those specifications will be OK in iPad & iPad 2 - but not so sharp on a Retina display especially if zoomed larger on screen
    Now it seems 2048 x 1496 - double the original image size is suggested for Retina.
    You  can change an image in PS i.e. 1024 x 748 and change resolution to 144. PS will double the pixel size as you change the resolution. OK, just change pixel sizes back to 1024 x 748 and reolution is now 144.
    That indicates a sharper image which will be suitable for retina display and in fact all current iPad models.
    Today my 11th photo book was notified as available  in the iBook Store, all my images were pre-formatted at 2048 x 1496 @ 150ppi.   ( 2048 x 1496 = 3.063,808 pixels!)
    During delivery there were no issues flagged and after delivery no tickets.
    So I suggest all those folk pondering images sizes follow my example, which  is now proved to be accepatble!
    One thing puzzles me though, I dont use all images as full page and  they can  be masked down to - say - 250 x 200.  Should  just  make an image to fit the size I  want to display ??

Maybe you are looking for

  • Can't connect iPhone to MacBook, requires mobileme.

    Hi, so I have a MacBook Pro from mid 2009 and I still have Snow Leopard 10.6.8 and I want to keep it that way. My problem is that it won't accept my iPhone without me being registered at mobileme. Now mobileme was replaced by iCloud and is inactive s

  • Reader 8.1.2 will not launch

    I am unable to launch any Adobe Reader above 6.0 under WINXP. My install appears to go flawlessly. When finished, there is a new Adobe reader Icon on the desktop and all pdf apps have become associated. Regardless of whether I try to launch a pdf, or

  • IMessage arrive at 3 Phones same time

    I´ve 3 iPhones (3GS, 4 and 4S)  on the same apple ID. Now I get iMessage on all 3 Phones? Do somebody know this Problem? thx

  • Error sending method invocation request(oc4j 10g(10.1.3.1))

    Dear, I have two applications a.ear and b.ear. They both are deployed on same oc4j container (10g(10.1.3.1)) Both applications use each others session beans. In order to make communications between these two applications possible I set global-jndi-lo

  • Reg : ALV HIER_SEQ_LIST

    HI , I am using the HIER_SEQ_LIST_DISPLAY for the output of my report . I have passed the subroutine into the TOP_OF_PAGE event and i am getting the top of page details in the output.. Same thing i am doing for END_OF_PAGE , but i am not able to see