Images appearing jagged, warped in PDF export

I am working in Indesign CS5. I have been exporting print and digital files to PDF for years with no trouble. All of my images are of appropriate resolution.
Over the weekend, I began to experience issues with export to PDF. Any placed image file is appearing as jagged or warped when exported to PDF. But looks OK when exported to JPG.
See attached image where the green text "GIONS" is rendering badly. The logo image file is 300DPI at 2000px wide. Placed in this document it is only at 35% its true size. Also looks perfectly clear with no pixellation or jagged edges when viewed in photoshop.
By contrast the placed vector file (white "Link" text at top) and all text in the inDesign file are rendering correctly.
I have never had this kind of issue before and I am at a loss.

First, why would you use a raster file for a log made of type?
Second, check the export settings you are using to be sure you are not downsampling too much or overcompressing.

Similar Messages

  • [JS][CS4/CS5] Images dropping off in scripted pdf export

    I've encounted a bug that I wonder if someone could try to replicate or suggest a workaround of some sort for.
    Some background: we often need to batch-export a number of versioned InDesign files to pdf. These files will often share a lot of content, particularly placed images. We've used Peter Kahrel's export script for this purpose, as well as a number of scripts of my own. The specifics of the script don't seem to be important. I've seen the problem in both CS4 and CS5 on the Mac.
    The problem: Placed Illustrator files (and pdfs) drop off of exported pdfs, without any kind of error being raised, after a user tries to interact with InDesign while it's tied up during a script which opens and exports one file after another. Once an image drops off, it will be missing from every subsequently exported pdf until the script completes. The pdfs are valid—they open and display just fine—they just don't contain all the images they're supposed to. Placed raster images are not affected.
    If anyone cares to try to replicate this for me, the script I used to trigger it was:
    var f = File("/path/to/InDesign/file.indd"),
        d = Folder("/path/to/export/directory"),
        e = 0,
        i = 1000,
        doc, pdf;
    while(e++,i--){
        doc = app.open(f);
        pdf = File(d.fullName + "/" + f.displayName.replace(/\.indd$/,"") + e + ".pdf");
        doc.exportFile(ExportFormat.PDF_TYPE,pdf,false,app.pdfExportPresets.firstItem());
        doc.close(SaveOptions.NO);
    The InDesign file can simply be a single page with any (as far as I know) placed Illustrator file or pdf. I used an .ai file with one black rectangle in the middle of the page.
    After getting the export script going in the ESTK, I Command-Tab over to InDesign. As soon as I try to click on any UI element (which will get me a spinning beach ball), the placed vector image drops off of the exported pdf and stays dropped off until I stop the script.
    While the solution seems simple—don't mess with InDesign while it's batch exporting pdfs—it's easy to forget that it's tied up, and the consequences of an image silently dropping off of an exported pdf could be quite dire.
    Thanks in advance.
    Jeff

    edit: Did file a bug report (5th of december 2012)..
    It is just unbelievable that this bug still exists! absqua, have you filed a bug-report?!
    Easy to reproduce, just launch script and click any toolpanel header while indesign running script..
    test_document.indd includes those black rectangles in linked .ai file.
    Right after InDesign ui-element is clicked, that linked .ai is dropped from rest of exported pdf's.
    #target indesign
    var f = File("~/Desktop/test/doc/test_document.indd"),
        d = Folder("~/Desktop/test"),
        e = 0,
        i = 20,
        pdf;
    while(e++,i--){
              myDoc = app.open(f);
        pdf = File(d + "/" + " test_" + e + ".pdf");
        myDoc.exportFile(ExportFormat.PDF_TYPE,pdf,false,app.pdfExportPresets.firstItem());
              myDoc.close(SaveOptions.NO);

  • Images scrambled and error on PDF export since upgrade to 2014.1 / 10.1.0.71 build

    I am using a mac and just upgraded to the 2014.1 / 10.1.0.71 build.  I was working on a file and installed the upgrade (I know I shouldn't have done that while in the middle of a project.  Brain lapse), but as soon as I opened the file the images are scrambled when viewed on "high quality display".  If I view them on "typical display" they show up fine.  But now when I try to export as a PDF it throws an error and will not export.   The only solution I found was to reopen each image and save them out again as a new .psd, pdf files.  Then it seems to export properly.  If I try to import the previous files it says there is not an import filter for that file type.  Any ideas what could be causing this?

    Hello,
    it turned out to be an application problem that somehow only manifested itself since the upgrade.
    The problem was that we performed an update to the DB in the Corba object's deactivate method. The object had the method activation policy, and the update was a left-over from way back when the object was stateful.
    There was a race between the last update (xaostart/xaoend cycle) in the first Tuxedo server and the commit (xaoprepare) in the second Tuxedo server.
    The fix is to move the update out of the deactivate method and add it at the end of the service method(s). Alternatively we could have switched to transactional object activation, but since there is only one invocation to the object, that did not make sense.
    Roger
    Edited by: Roger Fischer on Sep 7, 2011 10:32 AM

  • HELP - lost pdf export presets?!

    Help! This morning I began work in ID and suddenly discovered that my long list of PDF export presets (which I use for work daily) was simply gone. I have only the default list - screen, print, press, etc. These are very complex presets that I need on a daily basis to produce files for my clients - I really need them.
    What happened?? Nothing is different about today; I went through my standard work process this morning. Nothing traumatic happened to ID. I repaired disk permissions and restarted yesterday, but that was a standard maintenence procedure for me - nothing unusual.
    This morning I noticed that the files in the user>library>pref?Adobe InDesign folder all showed as being modified at 8:30 this morning, when I started work.
    I back up my files and can probably (I hope) recover any missing file - but where exactly is it? I can simply replace the entire preference folder in my user folder...
    thx
    Libby
    TiBook G4/IDCS 1

    Just checking: I think this is what I do now: open Export PDF dialog; set all options,
    and click Save Preset... in bottom left? they then all appear permanently under File>PDF Export Presets and in Export PDF dialog. Is that what you mean?
    (don't mean to bug you, Buko; I appreciate all the help as ever. just trying to collect all new info.)

  • Why does my high res photoshop image appear blurry when placed in InDesign and Exported as PDF?

    Hi there,
    I have a problem I've been trying to solve for days but just can't find the answer anywhere on the internet.
    I have a large, good quality photoshop file (2268 x 979 pixels, resolution 300 pixels per inch). When I place it into InDesign, the image appears OK (I've changed my display settings to HIGH) - I then resize it in InDesign to 10% and the file still looks great! Then, when I export it as PDF (high quality print) it looks blurry.
    Does anybody know why? The strangest thing is, I've placed other photoshop images in the same InDesign file and they look crystal clear. It is just this one I am having trouble with. I've saved it in the same folder as the other pictures, I've tried placing it as psd. , jpg. , photoshop pdf, png. everything...
    The image looks great in both photoshop and indesign, only when exported as pdf it looks awful.
    Any help will be greatly appreciated,
    Many thanks in advance!
    Weronika

    It's probably the extreme reduction -- you're throwing away 90% of the image pixels and interpolating, and then using jpeg compression on top.

  • Images appear faded when exporting to pdf

    Hello, I have .png images in my document; and regardless of the blend space I choose, or pdf export settings, the images appear faded when I export to pdf. I noticed that when I print the file as a pdf, the colors don't change, it only happens when I export, so I'm assuming it's related to pdf export settings? any help would be appreciated. another thing that might be relevant; in the document, when it's just a single image on the page, it doesn't appear faded in the exported pdf. but when there are several images together, overlapping on the page, fading occurs. also, if I select compatibility as acrobat 4, images are not faded in the pdf, although they do appear lower quality. but i can't set compatibility at 4 because i have several movie files and hyperlinks embedded, which 4 doesn't allow. hope i've made sense, i'm new to indesign, using CS3.

    Hi Peter, I changed the colorspace in acrobat to the same as indesign, sRGB... + US web coated v2.. then I exported again, but still have faded text in text boxes as well as faded images (.png files). I notice when i zoom in and out quickly, the images flicker a bit and look how they should but when I stop they stay faded. I'm just curious if anyone were to place a .png image in their indesign + export to pdf, whether they'd get the same result.
    as far as the monitor goes, to be honest, im not sure if it's calibrated. and i feel bad asking what that means

  • PDF Export Fonts Appear Jagged

    Using the built in Pages templates, PDF export documents seem to have proper anti-aliasing for some fonts but none whatsoever for others. In a resumé template the top right block is not aliased, nor are the headers anywhere else in the doc. However the main paragraphs are. I've tried several different fonts and templates, the end result always the same. At the moment this is making Pages completely unusable for me. Anyone else seen this problem, or a means of fixing it? The only thing I've not yet tried is a complete reinstall.
    Thanks

    PDF export documents seem to have proper anti-aliasing for some fonts but none whatsoever for others
    The way this works depends in part on the programming of the spline shapes you embed and in part on the programming in the application that displays the digital document.
    PostScript depends on a smart rasterizer. The rasterizer uses suggestive 'hints' in Type 1 splines to gridfit to the address space.
    TrueType depends on smart splines. The rasterizer uses strong 'instructions' in the TrueType splines to gridfit to the address space.
    Type 1 'hints' and TrueType 'instructions' can be coupled with additional solutions in the form of anti-aliasing that grayscales the gridfitting.
    Part of what you pay for when you pay for a font is the gridfitting. If memory serves, it took a team of ten developers a year to do the gridfitting instructions for the TrueType fonts in System 7.
    OS X has the ability to rasterize as well Type 1 splines (supported since the Open Font Architecture in Mac OS 7.5) and TrueType splines, but the place to begin is the splines themselves, since if they are shoddy then the imaging is shoddy too. The rule is garbage in and garbage out.
    Not that this helps, but still ...
    Best,
    Henrik

  • Fonts jagged in InDesign and PDF export

    I've been troubleshooting this issue for days, with no success. I'm using IDCS6 on a MacBook Pro with Mountain Lion, and it probably happens with all fonts, but I've noticed it specifically with "Din mittelschrift" at a large pt. size and 100% magnification. It wouldn't be a terrible thing, since it's not noticeable in most of the document, but I'm trying to create a catalog of sorts (as a series of 2-page spreads) and the brand's name on the cover has the most obnoxiously rough edges - I can't send the PDF off to anyone in this condition.
    I'm an experienced computer user but an InDesign novice, so I've been trying various things I've found online that successfully solved others' problems, without having a very clear idea of what many things in ID do. Reading a few Adobe tutorials didn't enable me to fix things, either.
    I've seen others post that jagged-looking fonts can clear up when exported to a PDF, but that didn't work. When I export to a PDF, interactive or not, it appears jagged at 100% - though strangely enough, at 300% it looks fine.
    I checked my ID display settings. It's jagged even at High Quality - and display settings in InDesign wouldn't affect the PDF, anyway.
    I made sure the font was installed in the proper place (Library/Fonts), cleared my font cache, and restarted the computer.
    I tried converting the text to outlines in InDesign.
    I tried setting the opacity to 99.9%.
    I changed the color of the text to a grey (240/240/240) to reduce the contrast in case that was an issue.
    The rest of the document appears fine in InDesign and as a PDF. No extreme jagged edges or low-quality appearance.
    Right now the document is intended to only be viewed on a screen, but since I'm unsure if I'll ever be asked to prepare it for printing I created it using ID's print layout. I've been avoiding converting it to a web layout because that would mean hours of reformatting, and I figure that fonts should render with smooth edges no matter what the layout is set as.
    I think I've done more than what's listed above, but forgotten the specifics.
    I'll try anything short of destroying the catalog and starting over.
    Thank you!

    Can you take a screenshot of what this looks like and post it?
    Also, I've noticed that sometimes weird crap will show up when you view something in Acrobat. Like you can see a line between the font and the stroke, but when you zoom way in, it looks fine. It will print fine as well. Just a display issue. Can you print it? When you print it does it look like crap?

  • Remove ALL Images from PDF Export?

    I'd like to remove ALL images from a PDF export (Indesign CS6), with the intention of having the smallest file size possible for review. All the images are Photoshop PSDs.
    I have created a PDF Preset (PDF 1.7) that omits EPS, PDF and Bitmap.
    That covers any PSDs that contain opaque backgrounds, i.e. are considered to be non-transparent. However, any PSDs that do NOT contain such backgrounds still appear in the exported PDF. I assume they are NOT considered to be Bitmaps?!?
    I've gone for maximal compression of images (in the Preset) also just to see how small I can get the file, but it's still over a meg, and I'd really like even smaller. I live in a rural part of England where net access is painfully slow, and even a few meg of data takes far too long to upload, not to mention the constant drop-outs. Consider further that my document is likely to grow by several orders of magnitude and hopefully you can see why I'd like to sort this issue out as soon as possible.
    I've not done any scripting but assume it would be trivial to hide images with a script. However, I'm not sure how such a script might know how to make visible only the images that were previously hidden by the script. Obviously I would not wish to unhide images that must stay hidden. Maybe some form of image/object tagging, if that's even possible in this product, i.e. tag them "temp hide" on first pass of the script, and so forth.
    Any suggestions much appreciated.
    Regards,
    James

    @James – to mark the container frames of the nonprinting images by a fill color, you could add the following lines of code in the for loop:
    allGraphicsArray[n].nonprinting = true;
    //The parent of the graphic is the container that holds it.
    //We could use it to fill it with a tint of e.g. 20% of black:
    allGraphicsArray[n].parent.fillColor = "Black";
    allGraphicsArray[n].parent.fillTint = 20;
    But this approach will add a new problem for images, that only use a portion of the holding graphic frame. Or are only partly visible due to a clipping path or a clipping mask or totally transparent areas due to transparent pixels.
    Already colored backgrounds will be recolored…
    @Sandee – I see the advantage of the PostScript to Distiller way in this situation, but there are two disadvantages:
    1. Live transparency will be flattened (could be no issue in this use case, but you never know).
    2. The gray area with the big X will be applied also to parts of the images where no pixels are present (transparent pixels in PhotoShop or TIFF files).
    To work around all these issues we need a more complex script that is building a  path object around the transparent parts of an image or using an applied clipping path for that purpose and fill that with a gray tint (and maybe with an X).
    Here some screen shots to illustrate the problems (with or without using PostScript/Distiller):
    1. Original set up:
    One placed PhotoShop file with transparency stacked upon the text frame.
    The image inside its holding frame is selected.
    The visibility of one of its layers depicting a second chair on the left side is switched off.
    2. The same setup in a different view:
    3. After running the script with the two additional lines of code:
    Using the PostScript method would do nearly the same plus adding a cross using the  area of the selected image.
    Uwe

  • Illustrator images with jagged edges when converting a document to pdf

    Hi,
    Illustrator CS6.
    I created some images in illustrator. Saved the images as a .tff. Put the images in a Word.docx. Looks great. Convert the word.docx to a pdf and my images have jagged edges. I have anti-alaising check in my preferences but still the image looks bad.
    Any suggestions?
    thanks

    Did you resize the images larger than when inserted into Word?
    What resolution did you export the TIF from AI at?
    What was the Anti-aliasing setting (type or art optimized or none)?
    Are you using Word's Save As PDF, or the Adobe Acrobat add-on?
    Are you viewing the result in Acrobat (or Adobe Reader) at 100% or larger?
    Mike

  • Why won't copy/paste images appear in PDF (from Word 2007)?

    I find all places in a Word 2007 document where content copied from Power Point 2007 and then pasted into a Word 2007 document does not appear in the subsequent PDF file I generate. White space of the same size as the pasted content appears in its place. Why is this happening and are there any suggestions to work around this issue? What is curious is the free PDF creation tool that you can use to generate a PDF within Word 2007 (by choosing file save-as PDF) does NOT have this same issue. I don't want to use Word's tool since it doesn't allow for the option settings flexibility I need to produce the final PDF.
    I already tried saving the Word file as XML and then re-saving as Word .docx and regenerating the PDF from Acrobat: the graphics are still missing. I also tried in Acrobat Help> Repair Installation and then shut down/restarted my computer. Again, the regenerated PDF is missing the graphics.
    Personally, I do not use a copy/paste method; rather, I use insert>picture>from file or paste special as a grphic file type. I know the same graphics placed this way come out fine in a PDF I generate from Acrobat. However, I support a bunch of engineers who make copy/paste a shortcut habit. I will have no luck telling them not to do this.
    I appreciate any help with this.

    Preferences in Acrobat reader under Page Display are already set to Show Large Images. I assume that is the setting you mentioned.
    I don't know of any setting in Word 2007 that would make a difference. Does anyone else have work around suggestions?

  • CS3: PDF-Export Transparency Issue when Image-Links are missing

    I have a Layout with a transparent Frame on the top most Layer. For this Workflow-Step I do not have access to the original Image-Links, so I guess that all I see are the embedded Preview-Pictures and InDesign reports that all Object-Links are missing.
    If I export this Layout as JPG, the resulting JPG looks like the WYSIWYG in InDesign, which is suitable for this workflow-step. However when I export as pdf, the Frame is not transparent anymore. Instead it is filled with white color and covers the rest of the Layout. In Adobe Reader I can actually select the wrongly covered Picture at the border of the frame and copy&paste it somewhere and it looks fine.
    When I provide the original Frame-Picture and repair the missing Link in InDesign, PDF-Export works fine.
    I have installed & updated InDesign on a new Mac OS X 10.4.11, so all settings should be default.
    Transparency Blend Space is set to CMYK. I tried all default PDF-Export Profiles and tried a lot of different settings in the pdf-export dialogue including different PDF-File-Versions, Simulate Overprint on/off, Color-Conversion disabled, disabling Picture-Compression and much more. I also tried to Print a PS-File and then use the Distiller: same result.
    I use Adobe InDesign CS3 V 5.0.2 and tried Adobe Reader 8.1.2 and Adobe Acrobat Pro 8 to display.
    Any Ideas?

    Transparency flattening REQUIRES having access to the high-resolution images to get good results. One of the slogans I teach printers is "Fatten before you flatten." Meaning, replace the low-res images with high-res images.

  • Maximum Image Quality for PDF Export

    I'm having a pretty big pain with some of my images, and I wanted to make sure that when i'm exporting my document to a PDF, I'm getting the very best resolution possible. I've attached a screenshot of the settings I'm using... are these the best settings I can set for getting the best resolution from my PDF
    export?

    First, the cost of printng isn't necessarily directly related to quality. There are too many factors such as full color and additional spot plates, the size of the run, and the size and type of the press to make any judgements based on price, not to mention the skill and standards of the printer. And then you still have many printers willing to do the same quality work at a variety of prices depending on location, market, and how busy they are. Kind of like making a genearlization about the price of a car.
    @ Luke, setting downsampling to none will guarantee that all images are sent at full resolution, but that isn't necessarily a good thing. As already pointed out there is no advantage in sending more data than required to print the image. The OP has alread chosen ZIP compression, which is lossless, so he isn't introducing any jpeg artifacts, so all the downsampling is doing is setting a ceiling above which images will be downsampled. Images below that threshold will be sent at full res.

  • InDesign Book Project...some images/graphics not appearing in print-ready PDF

    Some images/graphics not appearing in print-ready PDF. Why? and how to fix.
    The images are linked.

    That didn't work, but i copied images from other parts of my document that did work and pasted/resized to replace images that didn't import and that seemed to work.
    still wish i could figure out why it happens in the first place so i don't have to do this other process.

  • Image appearance in Lightroom does not match exported .jpg

    First time user of Lightroom, so be gentle.
    I edit a RAW file in Lightroom and get it looking good, but when I export to jpg I run into a problem where the photo takes on a strong rosy hue.
    This image shows the problem:
    http://www.vaughnsphotoart.com/miscimg/colordifference.jpg
    I took a screenshot of Lightroom, and superimposed the jpg output next to it.
    I have been using RawShooter and have had no problems with the exported files matching the in-program image. I've had pretty good luck getting on-screen views to match my prints. So I'm a little baffled here at what to do. I see others are running into this as well (see http://www.adobeforums.com/cgi-bin/webx/.3bc34927/2 ) so a response might help many.
    Am I correct to guess this has something to do with the Adobe ProPhoto color space?
    What steps should I take to get my in-program image appearance match the exported version? I suspect I am missing a calibration process to get my color spaces to match, but I don't know how to affect the one Lightroom uses. Can anyone give some straightforward advice on what to do here?

    I had exactly the same experience as Vaughn and David. I tried to do some tests of my own:
    1. Exported a RAW image from LR as JPG, sRGB color space
    2. Exported the exact same image as JPG specifying Adobe RGB
    3. Exported the exact same image as TIFF (8bit, LZW compression), sRGB color
    4. Exported the exact same image as TFF (8bit, LZW compression), Adobe RGB color space
    The resulting images can be seen in the following web album:
    http://picasaweb.google.com/Chris.Diewald/TestExportsFromAdobeLightroom.
    (Most web browsers still do not care about embedded color space tags, but it appears that the images on the web page do not have a color-space tag anymore ! Still, they demonstrate what I see in other software on my screen.)
    5. I opened these 4 images in Photoshop CS2, working space Adobe RGB (!), but specifically using the embedded profile (in the case of of sRGB exports).
    Result: All 4 images - whether jpeg or TIFF, sRGB or Adobe RGB - look identical. And they are all identical to the likeness seen in LR!
    6. I opened the sRGB images (jpg and TIFF) in Photoshop, but this time without preserving the embedded sRGB profile ("discard the embedded profile, don't color-manage"):
    Result: The two sRGB images show a distinctive shift towards red and are a tad brighter. This was expected in a way.
    7. I opened these 4 images in Microsoft Fax and Picture Viewer:
    Result: All 4 images, whether TIFF or JPG, whether sRGB was embedded or Adobe RGB, are displayed identically, but *different* from what is seen in LR - more red and a bit brighter. Just like in Photoshop when the embedded sRGB profile was ignored.
    8. Out of curiosity, I opened the 4 images in Picasa 2.5 (so popular with amateurs, so nice and so blindingly fast with huge masses of images. No comment on LR here...).
    Result: Whether JPG or TIFF, the sRGB image comes out as redder and brighter, the AdobeRGB image exactly as viewed in LR!
    9. Last Test: I opened the 4 images in Paintshop Pro 9.01
    Result: same as those reported for Picasa. sRGB is not as seen in LR!
    What does that suggest? I am not a color-space expert, so I leave that to those who know. But I am worrying whether LR really does what it says when I export?
    Chris

Maybe you are looking for