Images look less saturated in Photoshop CC 2014

I import my RAW images into Lightroom 5 and make some basic adjustments.  Then I edit the image in Photoshop with the Lightroom adjustments.  I clean up the images and crop to the size I like and then I use the Perfect Effects 9 plugin to do some more edits.  I finish my edits in Perfect Effects 9 and save them which brings me back into Photoshop CC as a new layer.  In Photoshop the image looks less saturated than it did in Perfect Effects 9.  I then save the Photoshop file and exit.  When I look at the PSD file in Lightroom 5 browse window, it looks the same as it does in Perfect Effects 9.  Why does it look less saturated in Photoshop CC 2014?
Here are my colour settings:
Lightroom 5:
External Editing:
     Edit in Adobe Photoshop CC 2014:
     File Format = TIFF
     Color Space = AdobeRGB(1998)
     Bit Depth = 16
     Resolution = 240
     Compression = zip
Additional External Editor:
    Preset = Perfect Effects 9 Suite
    File Format = PSD
    Color Space = AdobeRGB(1998)
    Bit Depth = 16
    Resolution = 300
Perfect Effects 9:
General:
     Working Color Space = sRGB IEC61966-2.1    
Files:
     Copy Options:
     File Format = PSD
     Color Space = sRGB IEC61966-2.1
Plug-ins:
     Lightroom:
     File Type = PSD
     Color Space = Adobe RGB 1998
Photoshop CC 2014:
    Color Settings:  Custom
    Working Spaces:
    RGB = sRGB IEC61966-2.1
    CMYK = U.S. Web Coated (SWOP) v2
    Gray = Dot Gain 20%
    Spot = Dot Gain 20%
What color settings do I need to use so that the images have the same saturation look in all three programs? How do you know which image in which program is showing as the correct saturation?

No, just keep it at sRGB. As long as you have the "preserve" policy, the working space actually isn't all that important. The embedded document profile will always override it (as it should).
I had to read this a couple of times to follow the trail properly. Leaving Perfect Effects (which I don't know at all) out of it - does the very same file iteration, with the same edits, look different between Photoshop and Lightroom? Did I get that right?
In that case you have a bad monitor profile. This can sometimes throw off one application but not the other. Recalibrate, or if you don't have a calibrator go into Windows color management and set sRGB IEC61966-2.1 as default display profile. When done relaunch all applications so that they can pick up the new profile at startup.

Similar Messages

  • Photoshop document images displaying less saturated in Photoshop only

    Hi there,
    I seemed to have either clicked on an icon or pressed the wrong shortcut somewhere but now my photoshop documents are displaying less saturated or sometimes psychadelic in Photoshop. Here is an example:
    (the first pic is the way it is meant to display, the second is how it is displaying..
    When I use the colour picker to select a colour from anywhere inside the picture it does pick up the actual colour and not the desaturated/strange colours. Also when I save the document out as a jpeg or anything and open it into something else other than Photoshop it displays correctly. Whatever it is is making Photoshop display ANY document that I open in that way. Really frustrated please help!!!!
    Kind Regards,
    Michelle

    Hi there,
    Thank you for your replies. Here is the screenshot:   How do I replace the display profile?

  • Double clicking a jpeg image in bridge opens the image in windows viewer not Photoshop cc 2014....any suggestions?

    double clicking a jpeg image in bridge opens the image in windows viewer not Photoshop cc 2014....any suggestions?

    Hi
    open Adobe Bridge click on the Edit>>> go to preferences >> then select file association on the left .
    then on the right scroll down and select the JPEG extension and change the application to which you want to open the Jpeg
    below is the screenshot for your reference

  • Image not being opened in Photoshop cc 2014 from Lightroom

    I am using the latest lightroom and photoshop.  When I go to an image in lightroom and right click, select edit in Photoshop cc 2014, it opens Photoshop straight away but it does not pass the image along... Any suggestions?

    I've tried everything I can think of to no avail.  It takes several minutes now to load an image from Lightroom into PS CC 2014.  PS CC 2014 is already open.  I just noticed a pattern.  If I edit a file (TIFF) format that has already been edited in PS and saved back to Lightroom, it loads very quickly.  However, if I am trying to process a RAW file, that is when I notice a significant lag time.furth
    SUCCESS!!!  Upon further investigation and seeing issues from other members regarding RAW cache issues I decided to move my RAW cache file path in LR to a different drive.  That seemed to fix the last issue.  I think the drive I had selected is going bad.  So the reinstall fixed my integration issues between LR and PS CC 2014 (thanks to everybody who suggested that) and changing my RAW cache file path seems to have fixed the last of my performance issues.  Now to reinstall my plugins and get back to editing my clients' images!

  • Images look darker outside of photoshop?

    I got a new computer last month long ago and installed cs4. Everything works fine, everything looks fine. But then if I save my image to a jpg and view it outside of Photoshop, it looks so dark! I re-open that same file back into Photoshop and it looks fine again.
    I checked all my settings from the photoshop in my old computer and everything is the same. I originally thought maybe it's my monitor? but how can it be when my images look fine in photoshop?
    I really have no clue. I thought maybe it's only when i save things as jpegs? but nope. same problem with bmp, pdfs, pngs, etc. Someone help me pleasssee!! I'm a freelance graphic/web designer and I can't afford to be having this problem!

    This means you need to calibrate your monitor to get a good profile.
    Photoshop is colour managed, which means it uses the profile where non-colour managed applications don't.
    Have a look at this: http://epaperpress.com/monitorcal/index.html
    Adobe Gamma is no longer bundled with Photoshop but You can try QuickGamma: http://www.quickgamma.de/indexen.html
    In the long run, it pays to get a hardware calibration device such a the Eye-One Display.

  • Colors look less saturated on tv

    my problem is this: I made a QT-film using Imovie and then I burned it in idvd. everything looked fine when i saw the dvd on the computerscreen but when i tried it on my tv the colors were de-saturated especially the reds.
    The original movie is very saturated but i like it that way. perhaps there is a tv safe color button somewhere that i should switch off before burning?
    I need help

    I noticed the same thing on a brand new Sony HD TV via a PS3, and for that matter when replaying the DVD on the Mac, and on a SD TV with 16:9 capability and a standard Sony DVD player. Everything got much better when I changed the quality factor from Best to Pro (look in Project Info, and also in Preferences for the default setting). Still not nearly as good as playing the iMovie project results or raw data via PS3, but definitely better. I get the impression that standard DVD results are pretty much always going to be of reduced quality. BTW, the source video was 1080i AVCHD which is spectacular; my quality expectations for iDVD were already low, but until I changed from "Best Quality", I was depressed.

  • InDesign output less saturated than Photoshop

    I am printing a series of images in InDesign CS4. The images had rich blacks and good contrast when printed in Photoshop CS4, but when printed in InDesign, the same images (placed from Photoshop) not attain the same depth of color (blacks appeared significantly grayer). All profiles are set to Adobe 1998, and the source files are RGB in .psd format. I tried synchronizing with Bridge, to no avail. Any advice?

    Here is the settings you should be using when printing RGB images from Indesign.
    Make sure Transparency Blend Space is set to RGB.
    Under Edit/Assign Profile to your document. This (RGB) should be the same as working profile assigned to your image. Choose the rendering intent of your liking but most likely Perceptual.
    Now in the ID print dialog.
    Output Color: Composite RGB
    Graphics Send Data: All
    Color Management Print: Document should be selected. Make sure the profile listed is the working space assigned to your image. 
    Color Management Options: Color Handling: Let InDesign Determine Color. Printer Profile: Choose your Printer Paper Profile. 
    Advanced: Pre 10.6.2 select Print as Bitmap 
    Now to Printer driver settings. 
    Under Color Matching select Vendor Matching or what ever the HP driver calls it. Just make sure ColorSync is not selected. 
    Again not sure what setting are in the HP driver but you want to make sure color management is turned off in the driver. 
    Post screen shot of the HP driver setting if you are confused.

  • Lightroom 5.5 support for 32bit images from merging HDR in Photoshop CC 2014?

    Why is it I can create a 32bit HDR image and make adjustments in ACR, but when I save it, Lightroom can't read it? Aren't they basically running the same engine? Is there a work around?

    Which file format do you saving your 32bit HDR image?
    From LR 4.1, Lightroom can read 32-bit floating-point images in TIFF and DNG file formats.

  • H.264 export image brighter, less saturated than final edit

    When exporting out of fcp, whether using quicktime conversion or compressor, the image is altered from the final edit. It sems the black and mids become raised during the export. Maybe there is a bit of desaturation as well. Does anyone else have this problem? or a solution?
    I can't imagine this is acceptable for anyone that has this problem. Overcompensating in the final edit does not seem practical either.
    I appreciate any and all comments. Thanks!

    I'm still in Compressor 2 world, but read here in the forums that new Compressor 3 has a new *Color Tab in the Inspector* to *select and adjust color space settings*. You can read about it in the [Compressor 3 Release Notes|http://www.apple.com/support/releasenotes/en/Compressor3.0rn>.
    Hope that helps !
      Alberto

  • Photoshop diplays all images with desaturated colors (Images look fine when opened in other apps)

    All of a sudden, when I open any image in Photoshop, the colors appear to be desaturated...In Photoshop only. When I open that same image in Window Picture Viewer, or Quicktimer, or even if I drag the image into a brower window, the colors appear fine. But in Photoshop, something is clearly wrong. Now, I can make color adjustments to the image, but when I save and reopen reopen it in another application, I can see that color changes have been made, but they still don't match what Photoshop is displaying.
    The images are RGB image...I've checked the color space setings in Photoshop, and they are the default (Edit > Color Settings: North American General Purpose 2 / RGB: sRGB IEC61966-2.1 / CMYK: US Web Coated (SWOP) V2, etc, etc). I also made sure View > Proof Setup was set to: Working CMYK. I even reset Photoshop to it's default settings (by holding down CTRL-ALT-SHIFT on launching Photoshop)...But the images still appear desaturated when I open them in Photoshop...So, I don't understand how this is still a Photoshop problem...But then again, they look fine when I use any other application on my computer to open them, so it's clearly not an issue with my monitor.
    The frustrating thing is, I haven't made any changes to Photoshop OR my monitor (that I know about)...Photoshop has worked perfectly for me for years, and now there's this SNAFU that I just can not figure out.
    Any suggestions?
    I've included a screenshot below to show the disparity between an image opened in Photoshop (on left) and Windows Picture Viewer (on right):
    Photoshop image on left, with desaturated colors...Same image in Windows Picture Viewer on right, where colors appear normal.
    Any and all help is much appreciated : )
    Best,
    -Austin

    It's difficult to provide help without knowing your level of color-management expertise, but I think you've helped us some with that in post number 2.
    Color management is basically this:  Images and devices have certain color characteristics, and these are described by color profiles, sometimes also called color spaces.
    1.  You should not need to use the Proof Setup at all to view your images on your monitor.  When things are set up properly Photoshop shows you accurate color without your choosing View - Proof Colors.
    2.  A color-managed application like Photoshop will try to show you accurate color on your display by interpreting both the image profile and your monitor profile and transforming the colors accordingly.  BY DEFINITION this will look different than other applications which don't do color-management as these just pump the image RGB values directly out to the display. 
    Thus:
    If your monitor profile indicates your monitor has a wide gamut, images with embedded profiles may appear less saturated inside Photoshop than from non-color-managed apps.
    If you view images that have an embedded wide gamut profile (such as Adobe RGB 1998 or ProPhoto RGB), Photoshop and other color-managed applications will interpret that profile and the colors will likely appear more saturated in Photoshop than in a non-color-managed application.
    It sounds as though the first case applies in your case here.
    You can check to see what monitor profile is associated with your monitor through OS settings.  I'm thinking, based on the caption buttons in your screen grab, that you've got Windows XP, but rather than go further with that assumption, I'll ask you to verify it first.
    -Noel

  • CS4 Color looks too saturated on Screen?

    Hi all, not sure why but my color in CS4 Photoshop look oversaturated.
    When I view them with ACDsee viewer or Canon software they both look the same. But when I use photoshop the images look too saturated. It's not easy to edit my photos, as the out put does not look the same as when I am editing.
    Any help or suggestions would be appreciated.
    Thanks in advance, awaiting any messages that may help out.
    Coolpix

    What are your colour management policies in the Color Settings panel? And do you calibrate your monitor?
    You can get increased saturation -- actually ugly colors -- if assigning a higher gammut profile to an image tagged with a lower gammut profile, e.g. assign AdobeRGB to an sRGB image.
    (Note that 'Assigning' a profile gives far different results than 'Converting to' a profile.)

  • Generate giving me trouble after Photoshop CC 2014

    I use Generate in Photoshop for a multitude of things. And in the last version of Photoshop CC it worked perfect.
    But after the update to Photoshop CC 2014 I´ve come across some problems. I was hoping this is some settings I could change, or that its something that is fixable. Because I surely hope its not meant to behave this way.
    The problem is that usually I do a lot of stuff within a group, like contrast changes, tweaks etc...and then name the group so that it exports the whole thing inside as an image. But, now after Photoshop CC 2014, every adjustment layer I have inside will affect all the groups lower down in the layer structure that are not part of that group. So essentially I can´t have the freedom I had before.
    What I mean is, if I have a layer/group structure like this, group 1 will export with the adjustments from the curve layer of group2:
    Layers:
    Group2.jpg
        -Curve adjustment layer
        -Image layer
    Group1.jpg
        -Image layer
    Please help!!

    Indeed, go ahead. Dxdiag reports an AMD card, Device manager lists an AMD card.  That's what you have.
    You go here: Download Drivers 
    If it turns out you have Intel graphics, go into your AMD control panel and make the AMD the preferred card.
    Gene

  • Sharpened image looks wrong on my NEC monitor while absolutely fine in MacBookPro retina

    Hi all,
    I use Photoshop CC. Today I came across this image on my NEC where I sharpened and added a bit clarity image looks just to find that image looks very wrong in photoshop but OK in ACR. Then I uploaded same image with same settings on my MAc Pro Retina however image looked perfectly fine in both ACR and photoshop. Then I cranked up clarity to a max and sharpening in ACR to a max too 115 1.0 25 0 image remained fine viewing on both ACR and photoshop on Mac.
    Here is upload:http://i1119.photobucket.com/albums/...psqqtqidhi.jpg
    I am using NEC Multisync PA241W w. Calibrated a week ago.
    Thanks

    Hi Melissa,
    Let me split in sections our conversation:
    "The raw file, using your numbers, top large, Photoshop, bottom, ACR. The smaller image on the right is the same thing only applied to the jpg version from the website you liked to. Super grainy in the jpg because the file is sooooo much smaller than the original. All displayed at 100%."  For the purpose of this experiment only RAW file participates in ACR.  To capture our experiment we use screenshot function.
    "so, what is different about your NEC and Mac images you originally posted... was it the exact same file at the exact same size?  Or was it 2 different images on different machines?" exact same file exact same resolution exact same filter applied in ACR. On Mac both ACR and in photoshop image displayed fine. On NEC ACR is fine however photoshop looks bad nasty.
    "So... if you did everything to the raw file at it's original size it should be OK. If you made a smaller version and then did the ACR stuff... it's going to look like crap. In order to display this ginormous image you had to resize it at some point to get it into the screen shots. I think that is where the issue is..." How do you normally view image in photoshop? The way I do i zoom out to my likening for instance this image was fine to view at 17-25% on my monitor and Mac too. Or I simply click on "fit to screen" option at it fits just fine. However image is view at 28.36% out of full 100%. If you choose to view at 100% you would get zoom like you have here in your screenshot. So to display it like I do just click fit to screen and that will do.

  • Images look fine in Bridge, but way off when opened in Photoshop

    Not sure what I've done to my system, but am now having some color-management woes. I am using Photoshop and Bridge CS5.1, and for some reason, the color-management is not consistent between Bridge and PS... although it used to be until just recently. I am on a Mac Pro tower with a properly calibrated monitor (using an Eye One Pro), and all my other color-managed applications are behaving just fine, but I have this discrepancy now within Adobe where if I view an image in Bridge, it looks correct, but when I open that same image in Photoshop, it comes up way too light and desaturated. I have verified that a correct profile is embeded in each image, but this happens regardless of the source file. I have opened up grayscale images with a dot gain or gamma profile embedded, images with no profile embedded, sRGB and Adobe 1998 profiled images, and they all open up too bright. It seems like some kind of conversion must be happening, but I can't understand what that would be. Color Settings is set to preserve embedded and ask when opening for mismatches, but that's the same as it's always been on my system. I understand without a "suite" install, I cannot access the Creative Suite Color Settings dialog to sync color across multiple Adobe apps, but things have been fine for years between my PS & Bridge, so clearly I've done something wrong. It's also worth noting that RAW images in Bridge open up looking identical in the Photoshop RAW processing dialog, so somehow this is more related to TIFF, PSD & JPEG files.
    I have used the Cocktail app for general system maintenance on my Mac, and in the dialog to delete old cahce files, I do recall it had an option to clear Color Sync cache (along with a bunch of other caches), so maybe that "clean up" somehow dirsupted my color matching abilities?
    I was on CS5 when I noticed this problem, so I tried uninstalling that, downloading the slightly newer CS5.1 and re-installing, but the problem persists. Maybe the uninstaller app doesn't get rid of all the hidden support files, or maybe this is something else entirely? Have trashed prefs files and relaunched, still same problem.
    Note how image on right is much lighter, shadows start to look posterized, colors lose saturation. Left is Bridge and Right is Photoshop. Screenshot done on calibrated monitor.
    Thanks for any suggestions!

    Thanks for your reply. Screenshot of my Color Settings attached. These are the same settings I've been using for many years.
    What's most interesting is your reminder to look at Soft Proofing. I normally only use that when prepping an image for print, and want to predict what different paper types will "do" to my image.,, i.e. matte paper has less d-max, etc. SO, My assumption was that Soft Proofing is normally in the OFF position unless I turn it on, and/or toggle it on-off with Cmd-Y keyboard shortcut one engaged. BUT, your assessment was spot-on, in that when I opened up the View > Proof Colors dialog, it was set to Working CMYK. Not sure why, how, or when that became the default.
    In all my time years with Photoshop, I've never needed to worry about soft proofing being ON without my permission, so I'm unclear how this came about. I honestly don't even know what the default has been for all the time that this was not on my radar as being a problem, I only know that when I did opt to soft proof an image, I woulp open the Proof Colors dialog, choose the appropriate device-specific paper profile to simulate, and then turn it back off when done. It would make sense to me that the default display in PS should match the (hopefully calibrated) monitor as a starting point.
    Several more screenshots below, experimenting with various Proof conditions. This one is a 16-bit Grayscale image, with my usual 1.8 Gray Gamma color space embedded. This was my first experiment, not knowing what the correct default should have been (or was for many years). My assumption was that proofing the same color space as the document (G 1.8 = G 1.8), there should be no visible difference, but in fact there is. The left image is open in PS being soft proofed to it's own G 1.8 color space, and it appears visibly brighter than the same image to the right in Bridge. 
    Now here's the same comparison, with Proofing set to G 2.2, which should be wrong, but visually looks like a much better match.
    Next I tried a color image, with Document Profile as the proof condition. Again, the Bridge image on the right looks correct, the PS image on the left looks washed out by comparison.
    Here is the same image comparison, now with Monitor RGB enabled (which pulls my current monitor profile as the device to simuulate). I'd say this is either perfect, or a much better match. This also makes sense and correlates to my suspicion that PS should be showing you things in your native monitor profile until you ask it to do otherwise with a custom soft-proofing scenario.
    So now that I think I've figured it out, I leave the Monitor RGB as the device to simulate, close the image, and re-open the image just to be sure, and this is what I get...
    Essentially back to the same problem. I verified that View > Proof Colors is still set to my Monitor RGB, but it's as if it's not really being applied. SO, I changed it so something else, and then changed it back, and then it looks correct... as if I somehow need to kick it and remind it to do what it's already set to do.
    So, the short answer is THANK YOU for reminding me to look at the proofing setup, becasue no I at least have a kind of workaround and know where to look. The tricker part is to understand why the default doesn't really stick to the Monitor RGB (if that is even the correct place for it to stay set to), and how or why did i get off into Working CMYK in the first place, as that's not a setting I've ever used on purpose.
    Thanks again,
    Eric

  • In Photoshop CC (2014), Hue/Saturation adjustment layer properties disappear

    I am running Photoshop CC (2014) under Windows 7 Professional.  The program is up to date.
    Today, while editing an 8-bit image, I added a Hue/Saturation adjustment layer.  Then, in the properties panel for this layer, with the on-image adjustment tool selected, I clicked a color in the image to get a range of colors whose saturation I wanted to adjust.  Next, using the saturation slider in the properties panel, I increased the saturation of this range of colors. Finally, I closed the properties panel by clicking on the double arrow in the upper right corner.
    Later, I wanted to modify this adjustment layer.  I double-clicked on the layer thumbnail to reopen the properties panel, and found that, although the previous increase in saturation was still operating, the saturation slider was back at its default position, and the range of colors that I had previously established was gone.  Thus, I could not make further adjustments to this range of colors.
    I then did some further experimentation:  I deleted the first Hue/Saturation adjustment layer, and created a new Hue/Saturation adjustment layer. I then again established a range of colors as above, again increased the saturation of these colors, and then again closed the properties panel by clicking on the double arrow in the upper right corner.  This time, however, when I wanted to try to modify this adjustment layer, instead of double-clicking on the layer thumbnail to reopen the properties panel, I right-clicked on the layer and then clicked on "Edit adjustment..."  This opened the properties panel, which, this time, correctly showed my original adjustments -- the saturation slider showed the positive adjustment that I had previously made, and the range of colors established earlier was still shown. But then, on a hunch, I added a Curves adjustment layer above the Hue/Saturation adjustment layer.  Now, when I again opened the properties panel of the Hue/Saturation adjustment layer (by right-clicking on the layer and then clicking on "Edit adjustment..."), my previous settings were gone -- the saturation slider was at its default position and the range of colors was gone!  (But the increase in saturation was still operating.)
    Thus, it appears that there is a bug in the functioning of the properties panel of the Hue/Saturation layer: In short, once you have added a further adjustment layer, you can't then go back and make changes to the properties of the Hue/Saturation layer.  I would be interested to hear if others have noticed this.  Also, is Adobe planning to address this?

    OK, I am not entirely sure I have understood your post completely, but when you edit a colour range with a Hue/Sat layer, and click off and back on again, it will default to showing the RGB values, which you may not have made any adjustment to.  If you pick the previous colour from the image, or a similar colour, it _will_ show you the adjustments.  So long as your picked colour is contained within the range of the previous adjustment.
    Ypu could also use the RGB drop down (actually they call it Master nowadays), and chose the colour that is closest to your previously picked colour.  I expect you are away that you can edit the colour range being operated on by dragging the four sliders on the two colour bars at the bottom of the Properties panel.
    Does that make sense, or am I going in the wrong direction?

Maybe you are looking for

  • Release Value Contract Report

    Hi, As we can get individual customer released value contract amount through T Code VA43 and report Via T code Z_XX_SD_059 for mass customers which is usually not giving the correct amount of released from value contract. The report which is extracte

  • One Step STO process

    Hello All, I wanted to know the logic regarding one step STO process. while doing Post goods Issue : 1) system posts the 645 mvt type (which is maintained in schedule line category NC) But i am unable to understand how system is triggering the 101 mv

  • My GD-80 won't display the control-f option for entering the raid bios???

    Hello, all!! I just learned today that MSI has their own forum so here goes: My 990fxa-gd80 v2 has just returned from RMA. It has the latest bios already installed 11.13 I believe. The issue is, I have two 320 gig wd drives that I want to put in a ra

  • How to Run a simple servlet "HelloWorld.java" in JBoss 3.0 ?

    Dear all, I am a beginner and I want to run a simple "HelloWorld.java" servlet . I need to use JBoss 3.0 . After I run this simple servlet, I need to use EJB-Servlet-JSP to implement MVC . I have the servlet code and I am able to compile it. But I do

  • What Mac Will Do the Job

    If i want to get a new mac but have a tight budget what will do the job well for my editing needs that will include feature length film and video. I want a new mac and not and old one.