Impact on CIN if the Leading Ledger FYV is JAN-DEC.

Hi Friends,
Is there any impact on CIN, if Leading Ledgers FYV is defined as Jan to Dec as per client requirement.
Thanks & Regards,
Chandra

No Answer, Closed

Similar Messages

General Ledger Accounting (New): Line Items of the Leading Ledger

Hello Guys,
We are planning to implement
General Ledger Accounting (New): Line Items of the Leading Ledger
0FI_GL_14
We are in ECC6 sap_appl 6.00 and BI 7.0 SP 14, BI Content 7.3 level 4.0
The new GL line item is available
Financial Accounting: General Ledger Accounting (FI-GL)
Available as of Release - SAP Enhancement Package 3 for SAP ERP 6.0
Shipment - SAP NetWeaver 7.0 BI Content Add-On 3 Support Package 08
Content Versions- 1.0; 703
Just we have to install SAP NetWeaver 7.0 BI Content Add-On 3 Support Package 08 and on ECC side SAP Enhancement package 3 for ERP 6.0 --. Financial accounting - SAP APPL 603.
Is it correct. Can you please confirm.
Thanks
Senthil

Hello Senthil,
Yes, thats engough, since SAP is recommending the same for that datasource 0FI_GL_14. I think you are already in that version.
See this SAP help document
[DataSource Transactional Data: 0FI_GL_14|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/45/4f8e8bbf3f4f63a5dd197ef7d53fa2/content.htm]
Thanks
Chandran

Choosing the leading ledger-non-leading ledger

Hi,
I am in a regional project in southamerica. We are goning to use New GL. We are going to have different companies for each country. The chart of account is going to be one which is usefull for all country (it has different group account for each country), we are also going to have a group chart of account for statement balance sheet. We have to report abroad by USGAAP, but locally by other rules. In the distant future we think to use consolidation.
We are going to define the leading ledger and the non leading ledger, but we have the following problems:
-Which one should be the leading ledger (USGAAP or local rules), because I need many reports for two rules.
-What should I consider for this decision?
-In case I choose the USGAAP as leading ledger, what functionality I am going to loose for local report, (inflation, some report, asset accounting (I need more than one depreciation area for local rules and in some countries the functionality of inflation, etc).
Thanks,
Cecilia

Hi,
I suggest to have leading ledger following group GAAP (inyour case US-GAAP, often IFRS). The number of reports does not affect this decision from my point of view as its the same, no matter which ledger is the leading one...
I am not familiar with inflation accounting but using asset accounting with derived depreciation area(s) which post the difference of (real-time) US-GAAP area (posted to all ledgers) and your local depr. area (to the ledger group needed) should work fine.
Set the derived depr. as a "real area" as a derived area does not provide the full (balance sheet) account determination functionality...
best regards, Christian

Choosing the leading ledger- non leading ledger New GL

Hi,
I am in a regional project in southamerica. We are goning to use New GL. We are going to have different companies for each country. The chart of account is going to be one which is usefull for all country (it has different group account for each country), we are also going to have a group chart of account for statement balance sheet. We have to report abroad by USGAAP, but locally by other rules. In the distant future we think to use consolidation.
We are going to define the leading ledger and the non leading ledger, but we have the following problems:
-Which one should be the leading ledger (USGAAP or local rules), because I need many reports for two rules.
-What should I consider for this decision?
-In case I choose the USGAAP as leading ledger, what functionality I am going to loose for local report, (inflation, some report, asset accounting (I need more than one depreciation area for local rules and in some countries the functionality of inflation, etc).
Thanks,
Cecilia
Edited by: Cecilia Penelas on Dec 6, 2010 6:18 PM

Hi,
I suggest to have leading ledger following group GAAP (inyour case US-GAAP, often IFRS). The number of reports does not affect this decision from my point of view as its the same, no matter which ledger is the leading one...
I am not familiar with inflation accounting but using asset accounting with derived depreciation area(s) which post the difference of (real-time) US-GAAP area (posted to all ledgers) and your local depr. area (to the ledger group needed) should work fine.
Set the derived depr. as a "real area" as a derived area does not provide the full (balance sheet) account determination functionality...
best regards, Christian

New Gl- report with some details of CO for the non leading ledger

Hi,
I am using New GL. I have 2 ledgers (local ledger and USGAAP); The local ledger is the leading ledger, so is the one which impacts to CO. I need some information in CO (mainly cost center) for the non-leading ledger (USGAAP). I am thinking in create a report painter with the table of non-leading ledger, but I cannot find a table in NGL which save the CO object and can choose the ledger. I am looking too, this information by a standard report, but I cannot find one.
Any idea about a solution of this situation?
Thanks,
Cecilia

Hi Cecilia, did you assign Cost Center scenario (FIN_CCA) to your ledgers?, otherwise NGL Tables (FAGLFLEXT and FAGLFLEXA) won't have Cost Center field populated. If this is the case, maybe your only option is use BKPF then BSEG + BSEG_ADD (Entry View of Accounting Document for Additional Ledgers) and pull Cost Center from there.
I hope this helps.

Difference between Leading ledger and Non-Leading ledger

Dear friends,
what is the main difference between Leading ledger and Non-leading ledger in New G/L.
Thanks in advance,
Babu.

This concept is introduced in SAP Ecc6.0
Many companies have to maintain books for more than two fiscal years (For example 31st December as per companies act & 31st March as per income tax Act).
So leading ledger & non leading concept helps in maintianing same.
Leading Ledger is the ledger in which all the entries are posted originally. From Leading ledger all entries flow into non keading ledger. You need not pass entries seprately in leading or non leading ledger.
In case your leading ledger is Jan to December, January will be the 1st period & so on.
In case your non leading ledger is April to March, April will be 1st period.
Also, The leading ledger is based on the same accounting principle as that of the consolidated financial statement.
The non-leading ledgers are parallel ledgers to the leading ledger. They can be based for example on local accounting principles
Leading ledger is integrated with all subsidiary ledgers and is updated in all company codes. This means that it is automatically assigned to all company codes.
In each company code, the leading ledger receives exactly the same settings that apply to that company code currencies, FYV and posting periods. You can define a second and third parallel currency for your leading ledger for each company code.
Non-leading ledgers are parallel ledgers to the leading ledger. They can be based on a local accounting principle of a country, ex: You have to activate a non-leading ledger for the individual company codes.
Regards

Posting period for Non leading ledger

Hi
I am having Leading ledger & Non Leading ledger.
I am posting a document on a particular date. The period relating to that date in leading ledger is open & in non leading ledger is closed.
As per SAP standard the system will check the leading ledger & allow the posting.
Is it possible to write a validation for the following scenario.
If a document is posted the system should check the posting period in both leading & non leading ledger, if both are open then only the document should gets posted other wise an error message should be displayed.
Kinldy help me to address this issue.
Regards
R.Karthigayan

You have a few options here.
1 make sure your periods align each other
2 Use both selection options in OB52 and allow certain users to restricted periods
3 Use authorizations to validate the user if they can post into a period
4 Create a user exit on the save accounting document function module to check the rules.
Please award points if this is useful.

Post vendor invoice to leading ledger

Dear all,
We have 2 ledgers, one is leading.
I want to post invoice to leading ledger by FB01L but this error occurred:
Postings to ledger 0L not permitted with account type K
Message no. FAGL_POST_SERVICE034
I checked Define doc type for general ledger view but hit this error:
Leading ledger does not require its own document number
Message no. FAGL_POST_SERVICE016
Please advise for how could I post transactions with vendors to leading ledger.
Thank you a lot.
Rgds,
Linh

HI,
Error message you encountered is FAGL_POST_SERVICE034.
The problem is caused by the GL account:
If the GL account to which the posting is made is open item managed,
then it is not possible (due to technical constraints) to post to
a single ledger or a ledger group only: The posting must be made
to all ledgers.
The alternatives to solve the problem are:
1) Change the IMG settings of the Real-Time Integration of Controlling
   with Financial Accounting so that the posting in FI is done
   not a group of ledgers, but to all ledgers in FI:
   Let the field 'Ledger Group (FI)' empty.
2) Do not use customer and vendor accounts as company code clearing
   accounts, but use ordinary GL accounts instead.
And Please go through the below points.
As by SAP standard, ledger 0L is always the leading ledger, so posting
to 0L results in posting to all ledgers. If you post a document to a
non-leading ledger or ledger-group not containing the leading ledger,
you could achieve via FB50L or FV50L.
Reg
Madhu M

Reval for New GL - local ledger (Z5)/Leading Ledger (OL)

I would like to find out if it is possible to restrict someone access to only running reval on the local ledger, but not on the leading ledger. The purpose is that we would like the local accountants to run reval on the local book (Z5), but we do not want the local accountants to be able to run reval on the leading ledger. Is this is possible? If so, how?

TRy this method.
firsr create Accounting priciple and assign to the ledger group.
1) Financial Accounting (New)-Ledgers-Parallel Accounting-Define Accounting Principles
2)Assign Accounting Principle to Ledger Groups
3)then in General Ledger Accounting (New)-Valuate-Define Valuation Methods, Define Valuation Areas, Check Assignment of Accounting Principle to Ledger Group (here assign the principle that you have created in the first step.
4)Assign Valuation Areas and Accounting Principles
This should solve your problem.
You need to creare accounting principles for local gaap and global gaap and do accrodingly.
reward if useful.
sarma

Extractor for Non Leading Ledger

Hi,
I am trying to create a DS for a non leading ledger based on table FAGLFLEXT (Totals). I am using TCODE - FAGLBW03 for that. When I try doing this I get an error message:
No extract structure exists for ledger table ECMCT
Message no. GQPI053
I am able to create a DS for the Leading Ledger with the same table in the same TCODE.
Any suggestions please?
Cheers
Anand

Anand,
You can go to BW01 Tcode in ECC and Execute Summary Table ECMCT.you would need a Dev key and then you can activate str and then try to create a Data source.But Why dont you go via FAGLBW03 and generate any specific reason.You want to create a Generic?
How you are goin to handle Delta?
Thanks!
~AK

Currency to Non Leading Ledger

Friends,
I want ot give the USD currency to my non leading ledger. how should i do that?
Please give me IMG path also.
My co code currency is INR. For my non leading ledger i want to give UDS currency.
Right now posting in non leading ledgers are also in INR which i want in USD.
Thanks & Regards,
Reva.

Hi Reva,
Have You checked this
SPRO--Financial Accounting (New)Financial Accounting Global Settings (New)LedgersLedger--Define and Activate Non-Leading Ledgers
Here if you provide the non leading ledger, it will take you to a screen where you can define the currency for non leading ledger
In this IMG activity, you make the following settings for the non-leading ledgers for each company code:
1) You activate the non-leading ledgers in the company code.
2) You can define additional currencies beyond that of the leading ledger. The first currency of a non-leading ledger is always the currency of the leading ledger (and hence that of the company code). For the second and third currencies of a non-leading ledger, you can only use currency types that you have specified for the leading ledger.
3) You can define a fiscal year variant that differs from that of the leading ledger. If you do not enter a fiscal year variant, the fiscal year variant of the company code is used automatically.
4) You can specify a variant of the posting periods.
Hope this helps
Regards
Pratiksha

Constraints on the Special Ledger

Hi All
I need a bit of expert advise on a solution that I proposed:
I have a client requirement where they wanted to implement a parallel currency to an existing co code, they are on SAP 4.7. We proposed a new company code as the solution with a new parallel currency in OB22, data migration etc.
However, they were asking for SPL and I think SPL will not work since they dont have a parallel currency maintained in the system for the co code, and when we define the SPL we have to specify the currency of the leading ledger as local and the currency of the second ledger as the group currency and when there isnt one defined, how can we make the values to flow
what happens to CO allocations, the Controlling area is defined in CHF just like the local currency..
What are the contraints of putting SPL onto a prodcutive company code.. any thoughts will be appreciated.
Thanks much
RS

Depends on how much of std reports you use. We make extensive usage of STD SAP reports as well as report painter reports built on GLT0.
1. Reports: You will have to build new reports on SPL to see the numbers in parallel currency as Std reports on FI side will not have it.
2. Transfer of Data into SPL which would mean that periods will need to be closed just to ensure that no document is posted into company while loading of data takes place ( Depends on how much data you want to load, could take anywhere from 30 mins to 8-10 hrs)
3. Carry forwards will need to be run at the end of the year for SPL, hence maintainence .
4. Elimination Entries : I am not sure how elims are booked in your company, but you may have to check that out as well.
5. As you mentioned before "revaluation of fixed assets at acquisition date will not happen with SPL" ( you may have to do research on this one )
These the the few that come to my mind. Since i am not familiar with your SAP environment, i cannot really comment on why this is better or worst .
I guess, you will have to sit down and analyze the requirement.
There is no right or wrong answer in this, just depends on the need of business.

Reposting from Leading ledger to non leading ledger using RGURECGLFLEX

Hi,
We have a situation where we are trying to post documents from 2007 that are in the leading ledger to a non-leading ledger. When we run the report RGURECGLFLEX it produces a list of documents that cannot be posted with the error "Document NI1N 4900000000 2007 is not relevant for your target ledger ZR"
When we did some investigation we found that the ledger group was specified with the leading ledger 0L on this and many other documents.
Is there a way that we can get these documents to post to the non leading ledger and ignore ledger group field / functionality?
Do we need to go through and remove the ledger group 0L on each of the postings and re-run the report RGURECGLFLEX?
We are looking forward to a solution
Thanks & Regards
Martin Weakley

Hi Martin,
From the SAP Service market place you should find a document
[https://websmp105.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000688032&]
FAQsGeneral Ledger in mySAPERPSolution
In this document you will see the following section "Parallel Financial Accounting and Ledgers"
under which you will see the following stated
If a customer decides to use the New GL but only initially uses a single parallel
ledger (the leading Ledger). The customer then processes some transactions
for a few months and then decides to use an additional ledger onthe system. Is
there a program that you can run to enable retrospective postingto a new non-
leading ledger?
SAP offers a service called SAP General Ledger Migration. For detail please see
chapter u201CMiscellaneousu201D.
More Information regarding u201CSAP General Ledger Migrationu201Dcan be accessed
using the quick link u2018GLMIGu2019on the SAP Service Marketplace (
http://service.sap.com/GLMIG). Please also see OSS-note 812919
with kind regards
Cora

Double Posting using Leading and Non-leading ledger...

Gurus'
I am at a client that is using the leading (0L) and non leading (PL) ledger set up. Also, we have configure an additional document document (ZF) for posting to the (PL) ledger. The following configuration settings have been made:
1     US GAAP (group accounting) (PLN)                    1     0L
2     Depreciation on tax limited value (cars)                    0
3     PAS (Polish Accounting Standards) (PLN)                    2     PL
10     CIT TAX (Polish taxation accounting) (PLN)                    3     PL
30     Consolidated balance sheet in local currency PLN       0
31     Consolidated balance sheet in group currency USD     0
32     Book depreciation in group currency (USD)                    0
Can someone explain why I am seeing a duplicate posting on the non leading ledger. Using the settlement transaction from Project Systems or ABZON from the Asset Module I get the expected (AA) document type posting on the leading ledger but also on the non-leading ledger. When I run ASKB, the document ZF is also posted on the non-leading ledger.
Can someone help me figure this out? Thanks,

Hi,
You can check BKPF (document header) and there is a field "ledger group" for which the document was posted onto. If there's no value in the field, it means the document was posted to all ledgers (leading and non leading).
Kyoko

Tax Date Based Non Leading Ledger BS, TB and PnL

Hi Gurus
In our scenario, we will be using the Leading Ledger for Accrual Accounting, while the Non Leading Ledger will be used for Cash Accounting. It is required, for management effectiveness to capture transactions on accrual basis (leading ledger), but as far as tax reporting is concerned, it will be on cash basis (non leading ledger).
Scenario is:
Vendor Invoice comes on Jul 1, 2009 with terms of payment as say 45 days. The due date is mid August. In accrual (Leading Ledger) accounting, we will book the invoice on Jul 1, 2009 (posting date) with 45 days credit period, and due date as Aug 14, 2009. Now, as per cash accounting (Non Leading Ledger) we should only book this invoice on Aug 14, 2009,when the cash outflow will take place. However, since in New GL posting automatically happens for Leading and Non Leading ledgers, the NL document also will have the same posting date as LL document (Jul 1, 2009). The TDS/ Service Tax etc. however will be deducted only on payment, in August, which is a different fiscal period (as well as different tax reporting period).
My question is, is there a way to use TAX DATE or some other date field for Non Leading Ledger, and have the tax reports generated on that basis? Mind you, the purpose of cash accounting is for statutory and tax purposes. So we need to be able to draw financial statements based on cash accounting.
Would greately apprecaite if any of you can help me guide to a possible solution. I have the following options:
1 - Create a report that will use (somehow) a logic to capture the transactions based on tax date
2 - Find a User Exit to capture the actual cash flow date and use it to generate the tax/ statutory reports
3 - Use Tax Date field to store the cash flow date and use it to generate the tax/ statutory reports
Any suggestions welcome!
Regards
Mandar

Hi,
using different ledgers for parallel accounting ( eg IFRS, US-GAAP, Indian-GAAP...) is not a matter of tax procedure assigned to a country and company code(s) assigned to a country.
The tax law for a country/tax jurisdiction code does not depend on which reporting standard you use (IFRS, US-GAAP, Indian-GAAP...).
Best regards, Christian

Impact on CIN if the Leading Ledger FYV is JAN-DEC.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for