Impacts of change in Base type of JVRN

HI Team,
As per Requirement i.e Freight on Vat I am change JVRN -Inp VAT w/o Cr Non-C , Base type from 0 to 363, if any impacts Existing Open PO's or any impacts by doing configuration in TAX PROCEDURE. Please explain to me.
Regards
Krishna

Dear Mohit
<b>As per the settings ,generally Change numbers with release key are created for BOM's.
The same T code CC01 is used for this.But in the front page of CC01,the second tab screen is Function,under that you select the radio button for Release key and press enter and as usual give the description,valid from date and change number status as 1 and click on objects and there you inlcude tick marks for the first 3 coloumns against BOM and save that.Eg Change number 500000000 is created
Now using this change number you have created the BOM for material X.in CS01 and saved it.
Now you have decided to change the Base quantity.
in CS02 for material X u have to give the same Change number or else dont give Change number. then only u can change the base quantity otherwise it will be showing as blocked(grey color field).
Now the other case is using CC02,give the change number and press enter,now in the release key field give value 1 and save it.
Now though the key of change number has been released you can not make use of this change number anymore for changing BOM's.
It means that BOM's base quantity cant be changed using this change number or any other change number.the only way is without change number u can change that.
Or else before releasing the change number in CC02,better always change the base quantity of the BOM.
<b>Surely this will help you.
Please reward maximum points and close the thread as answered.</b></b>
Please give a feedback regarding this.
Thanks & Regards
Karthik
Message was edited by:
Karthikraj

Similar Messages

Difference between base type 362 & 363 in taxinj procedure

Currently, we are using base type 362 for base amount BASB in TAXINJ procedure, but in frieght condition type FRB1 tax is not properly getting calculated. If we change the base type to 363, then tax is getting calculated correctly. Can anyone suggest what will be the other impact if we change base type from 362 to 363 for base amount BASB in TAXINJ procedure.

Hi,
363 is used for all sales tax {VAT (Inv or set -off) & CST} and 362 is used for to pick base value to BASB condition type from MM pricing procedure.
Check frieght condition type FRB1 and the frieght value related not added to NET value in PO.
Regards,
Biju K

Condition type to be loaded on Material cost after Taxes but shouldn't change Tax base Amount.

Customer requirement is that they want to deduct some amount after the Taxes (after BASB) &t load this amount value after taxes on Material cost (hence accrual KEY can't be used). but with the addition of this new condition type (for deduction) it shouldn't change the base amount for Tax condition type (BASB).
Basic Problem : new condition type value to be load on material (after taxes). but this condition value shouldn't change the Net price of PO(amount in BASB condition of Tax) so that base amount (BASB) of Tax procedure remain unchanged.
(Since it is to be loaded on material hence i cant use account key definitely. Also this cost to be loaded on material after taxes)
Ex -             PBXX =     100 base price
                 Freight =       20
   Tax base amnt =     120
               Tax (5%)=          6
                      Total =    126
     Other Charges=      10 (this 10 Rs amount in this condition type required to be loaded on material cost, at the same time this condition value shouldn't change the base amount for the Tax (BASB)
Please suggest (purpose is to load the deduction on material cost after Taxes & same time it shouldn't change the the amount after Tax base calculation)

Hi,
   Your condition type is without acrual flag in M/06. No acrual key is maintained in the MM pricing procedure.
   To achieve your requirement, maintain subtotal 6 against the condition type in your MM pricing procedure in M/08.
   Maintain the base type calc procedure as 362 against your BASB condition type in tax procedure. Keep the field blank for the tax condition type (VAT or CST / ED etc)
   Test the scenario again with a new PO. System will show the condition value in net amount field in PO, but the same wont be copied to BASB in tax procedure. Check the taxes pop up. Check the same and revert back.
Note: Similar requirement (not exact) for acrual conditions are mentioned in my doc: Tax Calculation on Freight - Different Scenarios You may refer it if required.
Regards,
AKPT

Impact of changing data type of a field in Database table

Hi All,
I need to change the data type of a field(which is not a key field and it has no dependency with any other field) from NUMC to CHAR by maintaining the same length. Please let me know if there will be any impact in doing this. Hope the following things need to be taken care:
- Take backup of entire data in the table before doing the change
- After changing the data type, I need to set the option 'Save Data' and then 'Activate and Adjust Database' in 'Database Utility'.
- Use 'Where Used List' to check the related objects.
Please let me know if there is any impact or any thing else need to be taken care apart from the above things.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Vidhya.

Hi,
even if the length is same there would be no impact.
just v need to adjust the database in the database utility.
check the table maintenence generator also. if not reflected there u need to delete it and create it again.
reward if useful,
teja

Impact of Changing User Types

What is the impact of changing user types from 'service' user type to either a 'communication' or 'system' user type? Will the change stop authorizations or will it only affect administration? Is the change related to the available fields or locking security and not necessarily related to authorizations.

Which release are you on?
It also depends on your config => rejecting expired passwords, compliance with current password policies (at logon...) and same user context for RFC calls.
You should first investigate why it is a "SERVICE" type user. If it is from a config wizard with a profile delivered by SAP, then there might be a good reason for this.
The authority checks on "SERVICE" and "SYSTEM" users are the same, except that "SYSTEM" users are not SAPGui capable. This is not only restricted to the SAPGui logon screen. And for all logon types, they are excempted from changing their password - both via the requirement to do so and the ability to do it voluntarily...
But if they can administrate themselves, then they can (authorization object S_USER_GRP).
The same cannot be said for "COMMUNICATION" type users. I recommend not using them at all and there are many SAP notes which correct standard config wizards to use the correct user type => SYSTEM.
"COMMUNICATION" users are "DIALOG" users, except that when you enter the correct password via the SAPGui logon screen, then a message is returned to inform you that the user type cannot logon from that screen. But other screens will work, if the first screen is skipped.
You can test this with transaction OBVU in the standard system, or any other Z-transaction of the same ilk.
Cheers,
Julius

Change Condition Base Value in Billing Process.

Dear SAP experts
for now, In third-party process, condtion base value of billing only come from oder doc's.
but we want to change condition base value of billing from PO doc's for some condition type.
(actually, we want PO Quantity as a condition base value in billing process)
where can i apply alternative solution?
Regards.
Juyoung

HI,
To elaborate, you can change the condition base value settings in the pricing procedure for the condition type.
Take help of ABAPer and let him know what exact qty or value you want system to pick up while processing billing docs.
Prior to do any changes, please also ceck if the new changes are impacting any old logics...
Hope it helps..
Regards,
SB.

How to change the data type in the table ESLL for the field USERF2_NUM ?

Hello Friends,
I have a requirement in which one of the change is to convert the data type of the field 'USERF2_NUM' in the table 'ESLL' from 'QUAN' to 'CHAR'.
How do i do it if i have an access to change it..........i think i should also check the impact of the change if done.
Kindly tell me as my requirement starts with this small change.
Regards,
Rajesh Kumar

Thanks for the reply Sowmya.
I would like to know 2 things.
1. Is it ok to change the data type of the field 'USERF2_NUM ' which is in the table ESLL. from quan to char.
2. The table ESLL already has entries. if we change the data type from QUAN to CHAR what is the effect on the existing entries of the table .
Kindly reply me back.
Thanks & Regards,
Rajesh Kumar

How to change the mining type of an attribute?

Quite often, when I build a model with Naive Bayes algorithm (using DBMS_DATA_MINING package) I get a model with some attributes
being type of VARCHAR2 and categorical mining type although the
data type of these attributes are NUMBER.
My question is, on what basis does ODM assign mining type to an attribute?
Is that the number of distinct values of an attribute?
Can I change these mining types somehow using PL/SQL?
I'm using ODM 10g R2
Thank you
Luke

Quite often, when I build a model with Naive Bayes algorithm (using DBMS_DATA_MINING package) I get a model with some attributes
being type of VARCHAR2 and categorical mining type although the
data type of these attributes are NUMBER.
My question is, on what basis does ODM assign mining type to an attribute?
Is that the number of distinct values of an attribute?
Can I change these mining types somehow using PL/SQL?
I'm using ODM 10g R2
Thank you
Luke

Change to Base in costing sheet

Hi Friends,
If one base ( BA01) is included in 3 costing sheets , now I am chaging to base BA01 fo costing sheet (CS01) and adding 2 activity types , now my question is since BA01 is incuded for 3 costing sheets(CS01/CS02/CS03) so the new actvity types will be added automatically for other two costing sheet bases.
Because bases are controlling area dependent and not specific to costing sheet.
Any pointers, please clarify my doubt.
Regards
Ashu
Edited by: ashutosh p on Jun 7, 2010 6:12 PM

Hi,
yes, thats what it is: "Because bases are controlling area dependent and not specific to costing sheet." So changing one base-definition will affect all costing sheets that use this base-definiton as well.
The only thing is, you enter cost elements (or groups of them) in the base definition, not activity types.
Best regards, Christian

Changes in Base Unit of Measure

Hi,
We got an issue,User tried to change the Base unit of Measure from NO to KG.
1.For this material we dont have stock in unrestricted and quality,But it has reservations. 2.It has got Scheduling agreement,3.This material is used In BOM.
So if i cancel reservations,then remove this item from scheduling agreement and delete it from BOM.Will it work further to change the Base Unit of Measure.
Please Do help me in this matter
Thanks and Regards

1) You can only change the base units of measure under the following circumstances
No stocks are available for the material.
There are no existing purchase requisitions, purchase orders, or scheduling agreements for the material.
At present, no purchase orders or purchase order items are being created or changed.
Item is not linked in any BOM as chield part
If requests for quotations, purchasing info records, or contracts are available for a material, the system emits a warning while changing base unit of measure. Still if you want to change unit of measure specify in a dialog box the factor for converting the base unit of measure into the new base unit of measure. The purchasing info records are then, if necessary, updated.
2) Solution
   As system is not allowing changing base unit of measure there will be either stock of this material or existing purchase document
1) If there are stocks in the previous period, you can clear them as follows:
a) Post the stock in the previous period to the current period (for example, using movement type 561) so that the stock for the previous period is the same as the stock for the current period.
b) Clear the stock with the posting date in the previous period (for example, using movement type 562).
2) If there are Open purchase requisitions, purchase orders, or scheduling agreements for the material.complete all P2P cycle for open orders (purchase requisitions, purchase orders, or scheduling agreements) and then close it.
3)Delete item from BOM
Then
1.     Run Trnx MM02 (Change Material Master immediately.
2.     Overwrite the old base unit of measure with the new one in basic data screen.
3.     Save the change.
3) System checks
If a change criterion (Trnx. code MM02) is meeting all necessary prerequisites (as mentioned in point 1).System allows changing base unit of measure. Otherwise it displays warning or error. U can display the reason for this, by choosing Display Errors (ctrl+F1)

Mass change in base unit of meausurement

Dear All,
Is it possible to make change in base unit of meausurement by using massd??
Regards,
Nitesh

Hi Nitesh,
Using massd transaction, unit of measure can be changed.
Please use the following selections,
1) Select Object type as Product
2) Under selection criteria, select the following attributes,
Header data Base Unit
Header data Product
Header data Unit of Measure
Location-Dependent Data Location
3) Under attributes, select
Header data Unit of Measure
Then press the select button bottom followed by pressing change with display and then you can make changes as you wish and then save.
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

'Propagation of Properties' report changes unintended document types

Hi All,
could someone explain how the 'Propagation of Properties' works?
I tested it for changing the custom property change. I have 4-5 different resource types with each property structure.
My intention is to change a particular property value. So,
I created a document of that resource type and assigned the value for it.
I selected the target folder(which also has other document types and doesnt contain this property) and give the property to propogate.
then in the result summary, i could see along with the relavent document type, all other document type and folders meta data also changed. However i couldnt see those changes in the corresponding object details.
I am really confused on how this is working.
1. Does it changes other document types by adding this property as a new property?
2. How can i see this new property value in the document type where the property is not maintained itself?
3. how to avoid this ? in preventing other document types and folders to get changed.
Please kindly clarify the questions. this would be very helpful in understanding.
Regards
Senthil

hi all,
Got the solution.
1. Does it changes other document types by adding this property as a new property?
             yes it impacts all the document types... including the folders
2. How can i see this new property value in the document type where the property is not maintained itself?
              if the added property is not part of property group. you wont able to see that.however the meta data would have updated with new property.
3. how to avoid this ? in preventing other document types and folders to get changed.
             Need to develop a custom report for the mass update of properties...
thanks for your support
Senthil

Changing preferred font types for each language separately in Safari

Hi, I'm wondering in Safari->Preference->Appearance, you can change the default fonts for your main language, which is most likely English.
However, if I want to change font types for each specific language, e.g. Japanese or Traditional Chinese, how could I do that? I assume that if I change in the Appearance menu, it's global to all languages (e.g. English)?
Just to illustrate my question, in Firefox, I can go to Firefox->Preference->Content-> Fonts&Colors->Advanced, then I can change the font types for each language separately.
How do I do similar things in Safari in Leopard? Thanks.
Message was edited by: nmuns
Message was edited by: nmuns

But it seems very weird that for all the beautiful font types in Mac OS, the users are only stuck with the default font type only?
Perhaps, but it's just an example of how different browsers and apps offer different features. You should use the browser that works best for you. While FireFox may be good for that feature, it can't display some languages, like Hindi, correctly at all.
It is possible to change the font using a custom style sheet, which you can select via the advanced item in Safari preferences, but I don't think there is any way to do this on the basis of language.
What language are you specifically interested in changing the default font for? If you are getting the wrong kind of font for CJK (for example, seeing Japanese character types instead of the Chinese ones in Chinese text), this might be fixable by changing the language order in system prefs/international/languages.

Change of Material Type in Plants

Dear Guru's,
Good Day.
I've two plant Codes Plant A and Plant B with one company code.
Plant A Procures a Material(ABC) from an Vendor. Material type for ABC is maintained as ROH(Raw material).
Plant B produces Material(ABC) inhouse and does STO to Plant A.
I've extended the Material (ABC) from Plant A to Plant B.
Now, I need to Change the material Type for ABC in Plant B as Finished Goods(FERT), which is not Possible by transaction MMAM.
I need to Change the Valuation Class and Price control for mateiral ABC in plant B.
With Regards,
Siddharth

Hi There
Steps in Split valuation
1. Define the valuation category Globally
2. Define the Valuation types Globally
3. which valuation types belong to which valuation category
4. Define the Vlauation category/Valauation type locally- Per Plant
Ref the below links for Split valuation config
http://www.sap-basis-abap.com/mm/step-by-step-procedure-of-configuring-split-valuation.htm
http://www.sap-img.com/mm025.htm
Thanks
Senthil

How to obtain Hashtable element (array) base type?

Hi,
     I have read the thread
          http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=52&threadID=531561
     on determining the base type of an object array.
     I tried applying the technique to my Hashtable where the element are arrays, this is how I am setting up my Hashtable to pass on to my native method
Hashtable ht = new Hashtable();
Float Kd[] = new Float[1];
Kd[0] = 0.1f;
Float from[] = new Float[3];
from[0] = -4.0f;
from[1] = 2.0f;
from[2] = 1.0f;
Integer indices[] = new Integer[4];
indices[0] = 217;
indices[1] = 17;
indices[2] = 769;
indices[3] = 23;
     myNativeMethod("dbname",ht);
     In my native method, I have the following which is able to determine the array size so I think it is kind of working/correct but when I tried to determine the base type of the array, I keep getting Bus error.
     Here is my native code (as part of my SWIG code)
     Should I be handling arrays obtained from Hashtable differently, can someone point out to me what the correct approach is?
Regards
8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------
if ($input != 0) {
std::cout << "SWIG ...parameterlist..." << std::endl;
// Generated typemap code
const jclass hashtable = jenv->FindClass("java/util/Hashtable");
if (hashtable != 0) {
const jclass enumeration = jenv->FindClass("java/util/Enumeration");
const jmethodID keys =
     jenv->GetMethodID(hashtable, "keys",
               "()Ljava/util/Enumeration;");
const jmethodID get =
     jenv->GetMethodID(hashtable, "get",
               "(Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/Object;");
if (enumeration != 0) {
     const jmethodID hasMoreElements =
     jenv->GetMethodID(enumeration,
               "hasMoreElements", "()Z");
     const jmethodID nextElement =
     jenv->GetMethodID(enumeration,
               "nextElement", "()Ljava/lang/Object;");
     for (jobject keyset = jenv->CallObjectMethod($input, keys);
     jenv->CallBooleanMethod(keyset, hasMoreElements) == JNI_TRUE;) {
     jstring key = (jstring)jenv->CallObjectMethod(keyset, nextElement);
     jarray value = (jarray)jenv->CallObjectMethod($input, get, key);
     jclass valueClass = jenv->GetObjectClass(value);
     jclass valueClassClass = jenv->GetObjectClass(valueClass);
     const jmethodID getName =
     jenv->GetMethodID(valueClass,
               "getName", "()Ljava/lang/String;");
     jstring valueClassClassName =
     (jstring)jenv->CallObjectMethod(value, getName);
     const char *vccptr = jenv->GetStringUTFChars(valueClassClassName,
                              0);
     std::cout << "vccptr is " << vccptr << std::endl;
     jenv->ReleaseStringUTFChars(valueClassClassName, vccptr);
     const char *keyptr = jenv->GetStringUTFChars(key, 0);
     std::cout << "key is " << keyptr << std::endl;
     int numElements = jenv->GetArrayLength(value);
     std::cout << "value array size is " << numElements << std::endl;
     // const char *valptr = jenv->GetStringUTFChars(value, 0);
     // $1 = CSLAddNameValue($1, keyptr, valptr);
     jenv->ReleaseStringUTFChars(key, keyptr);
     // jenv->ReleaseStringUTFChars(value, valptr);
8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------
Regards
Message was edited by:
nicholas_yue

You've asked the same thing before. Assuming that you've defined the function prototype correctly when you built the DLL from the VI, you should be able to call it and get the results from it. You do not need to change the return type when you build the DLL. Read the information at http://zone.ni.com/devzone/conceptd.nsf/webmain/7D6A20FE02EDBF318625690700704CF3. Even though it was written for LabVIEW 6, the section on Accessing LabVIEW 6x Arrays from Microsoft Visual C++ is still valid.

Impacts of change in Base type of JVRN

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for