In place upgrade Windows 2008 and SQL 2008

Hi all,
We are planning to upgrade to Windows 2012 and SQL 2012 , can we take this in-place upgrade path in the following order ?
Setup 1 Host with 2 VM's running Windows 2008 R2 on Host and Windows 2008 R2/sqL 2008 on VM's.
1. Host1(running 2 VM's) - In-place upgrade windows 2008 R2 to windows 2012 R2
2. VM1 on host1 - In place upgrade windows 2008 R2 to Windows 2012 R2
3. VM2 on host1 - In place upgrade windows 2008 R2 to Windows 2012 R2 (AD Server)
4. SQL running VM1 - In place upgrade SQL 2008 with DB/reporting services to SQL 2012 DB/reporting services
All Servers ( including Host and VM's) are stand alone in a workgroup setup.( except one VM a stand alone AD server by itself).
Thanks for your help.

Hi,
If you want migrate from windows 2008r2 to windows 2012r2, you must install windows server 2008r2 sp1.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn303416.aspx
For the host 1 upgrade, please refer to the following:
http://blog.powerbiz.net.au/server-2012/in-place-upgrade-from-windows-server-2008-r2-to-windows-server-2012/
For the SQL in-place upgrade, i think you may need to ask in SQL forums:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/home?forum=sqlservermigration
Hope this helps.
Regards.
Vivian Wang

Similar Messages

Has anyone upgraded sql 2005 to sql 2008 and win 2008 Netweaver 7.0, ECC 6?

We are currently running the following landscapes
Netweaver BI 7..0 on windows 2003 , sql 2005,
ECC 6.0 on windows 2003, sql 2005
SAP Portal 7 on windoes 2003 , sql 2005
And would like to plan the migration to windows 2008, sql 2008 IE 7.0
I just wanted to get some feedback regarding if someone has already done this and how you all went about to upgrade? Issues you encountered, things to avoid, all that good stuff
Without doing much research yet, and having just completed the migration from 32bit OS to 64bit and sql 2000 to sql 2005, I had to perform a NEW install of SAP on parallel servers , export from 32bit and import to 64bit servers
When we upgrade to windows 2008 and sql 2008, will we ALSO require to do a NEW install of SAP? just like what I just finished?
Please advise?
Regards & Thank You in Advance
Maria

Hello Maria,
Refer to http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/upgrade.aspx
Also you can refer to SAP guide for database upgrade to SQL server 2008 ,just go to the followng link
http://service.sap.com/instguides --> Other Documentation --> Database Upgrades --> MS SQL Server
Hope it helps
Rohit

Windows 2003 server and SQL 2008

Hi
Does SAP Business one support windows 2008 and sql 2008 platforms?
When i checked the partner portal it says that these platforms are not supported.Is there any update?
Regards
Louis

Hello Louis,
The only way to determine this is via the supported platforms page in the portal. This is the most up to date, and will include information for the future when this data is available. So for not I would only plan with what information is available.
Regards,
Paul Finneran
SAP Business One Forums Team

Windows Server 2008 and SQL Server 2008 R2 - ?? for replication with Oracle

Hello:
I am running Windows Server 2008 and SQL Server 2008 R2 - 64 bit
I need to replicate data between the SQL 2008 and Oracle 11.2 ?? with Oracle being the publisher
I also would lile SqlPlus installed on the server.
I need a definite answer as to what I should download from the Oracle download area. There are just so many packages and so many version I dont know what to download.
Thanks

Hi,
Currently Microsoft Windows Server 2008 and SQL Server 2008 are not supported for SAP Business One.
For detailed information about all supported platforms, we have the following link for your reference:
www.service.sap.com/smb/sbo >product availability > supported platforms.
Regarding the information on the service marketplace this is updated on a regular basis and provides the most up to date information regarding the supported platforms for Business One.
Platforms not mentioned in this documentation are not supported.
hope it helps,
Regards,
Ladislav
SAP Business One Forum Team

SAP R3 4.5b running on Windows 2008 R2 and SQL 2008 R2

Hi
Trying to obtain information on compatability of SAP R3 4.5b running on Windows 2008 R2 and SQL 2008 R2 ?
I understand that SAP may not support this? But would it actually work? Assuming we have a third party supporting it?
Jay

Hi Jay,
You may check the support in PAM http://service.sap.com/pam.
Ideally SAP shall not support this environment.
Reason being:
1) SAP kernel for R3 4.5b not available for windows 2008 R2
2) Compatible database library not available for R3 4.5b on MSSQL 2008 R2.
with above 2 reason you shall not be able to install R3 4.5b on Windows 2008R2 with MSSQL 2008 R2 database.
Regards,
Deepak Kori

BPC 7.5 SP4 Support for Windows 2008 R2 and SQL 2008 R2

The release notes for BPC 7.5M SP04 state that support has been added for both Windows 2008 R2 and SQL 2008 R2.
For SQL 2008 R2, there is nothing in the feature pack described as "SQL 2005 Backward Compatibility Components" - which was a required piece for BPC 7/7.5 on SQL 2008. Is the SQL 2008 version still a requirement, or does BPC 7.5 now not need the Backward Compatibility components?
Also, the ReprotViewer executable that is packaged with BPC 7.5 is the one for SQL 2008- will that work when installing SQL 2008 R2?
thanks,
Tony DeStefanis
Column5 Consulting

Hi,
we have the same environment (BPC 7.5 SP4 on Windows 2008 R2 64 bit and SQL Server 2008 R2 64bit).
we are developping our application-set and for the moment we have no problem.
regards
massimo

Two previous questions may not have been as clear as I would have liked. I recently upgraded my MacBook 2008 (10.5.8) to Snow Leopard (10.6.8). With the updates came iTunes 11.1.1 and Quicktime 7.6.6. I am still using Garageband 2008 and iPhoto 2008. When

Two previous questions may not have been as clear as I would have liked. I recently upgraded my MacBook 2008 (10.5.8) to Snow Leopard (10.6.8). With the updates came iTunes 11.1.1 and Quicktime 7.6.6. I am still using Garageband 2008 and iPhoto 2008. When I create music in Garageband I usually adjust the volume and save it. Even now when I share the Garageband created files with iTunes 11.1.1, the volime I previously set in Garageband is retained. However, when I use the music to create a slide show in iPhoto 2008 and export to Quicktime 7.6.6, the volume level I previously set is lost and seems to default to a low level. The problem seems to be either in the slide show export from iPhoto 2008 to Quicktime 7.6.6 or in Quicktime itself. Is there a work around, so that I can retain the volume level I had previously set in Garageband, a volume level that seems to transfer without problem to the new iTunes. But then iPhoto 2008 (slide show) possibly or Quicktime 7.6.6 do not cooperate. Before I did the upgrade to Snow Leopard, the new iTunes and Quicktime I had no problems with the set volume being retained in the old Quicktime. The reason I need control over the volume is that all these music files are uploaded to YouTube.

Two previous questions may not have been as clear as I would have liked. I recently upgraded my MacBook 2008 (10.5.8) to Snow Leopard (10.6.8). With the updates came iTunes 11.1.1 and Quicktime 7.6.6. I am still using Garageband 2008 and iPhoto 2008. When I create music in Garageband I usually adjust the volume and save it. Even now when I share the Garageband created files with iTunes 11.1.1, the volime I previously set in Garageband is retained. However, when I use the music to create a slide show in iPhoto 2008 and export to Quicktime 7.6.6, the volume level I previously set is lost and seems to default to a low level. The problem seems to be either in the slide show export from iPhoto 2008 to Quicktime 7.6.6 or in Quicktime itself. Is there a work around, so that I can retain the volume level I had previously set in Garageband, a volume level that seems to transfer without problem to the new iTunes. But then iPhoto 2008 (slide show) possibly or Quicktime 7.6.6 do not cooperate. Before I did the upgrade to Snow Leopard, the new iTunes and Quicktime I had no problems with the set volume being retained in the old Quicktime. The reason I need control over the volume is that all these music files are uploaded to YouTube.

XL Reporter in Sap 8.8 PL 16running On Server 2008 R2 and SQL 2008 R2

Within the above environment (XL Reporter in Sap 8.8 PL 16 running On Server 2008 R2 and SQL 2008 R2)
Xl reporter is loading and appears to work fine until you look at the spreadsheet result
It is completely blank except for the titles
Yet Excel Macros and the attachment paths are defined correctly
As can be seen when we export any report to Excel successfully
I've had another consultant look at my setup carefully just to be sure
He can't figure out why
Anyone with similar results
I would appreciate any comments
Georges Ostiguy

Even something as simple as a list of BP 's and phone number gives a blank report
When my friend who knows xl reporter much more than I do tried, he managed to get the
BP numbers but nothing further
I then brought him to another server with the same configuration , same result
He then tried it on one of his own servers with similar config = same result
Server 2008 Standard R2 64bit
MSSQL 2008 R2
SAP 8.8 PL 16
Sample demo database
I don't get it

EVGET in BPC 7 MS and SQL 2008

Have there been any change in how evget works in BPC 7 MS with SQL 2008 compared with BPC 5,1 and SQL 2005?
When I use EVGET in BPC 5.1 and SQL 2005 I always get RFN# when the cell with EVGET isn't updated.
But now when I'm trying BPC 7 and SQL 2008 I get i zero (0) when cell isn't updated. And some times I get another value that isn't the right value for that specific EVGET formula, seems like the system has an old value in memory thats shows, but when I update the, right value shows up in the cell.
This can be a bit confusing and even worse, in some of our reports the wrong value isn't updated when report is refreshed.
Anyone with the same problem or anyone who know if there are any changes made how the data is refreshed in EVGET formulas

Did anoyone resolve this issue? - we are facing the same

Unable to execute embedded application windows azure in Windows Vista and Server 2008

I'm having problems to install the backup application Azure.
In Windows Vista and Server 2008 .
I segudo instructions :
http://support.microsoft.com/es-es/kb/2934202
But I still can not install the agent.
When I run it , it is decompressed and then a window with an error.
Anyone else happens ?

The message that Windows creates me exactly is:
Unable to execute the embedded application to complete the installation.
After being , checking this:
Microsoft .NET Framework 4
Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Service Pack 1 Redistributable Package MFC Security Update
Windows PowerShell 3.0 (my machine is 2.0)
Microsoft.NET Framework 4 Client Profile (installed)
Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Service Pack 1 Redistributable Package (installed)
The announcement of support Server 2008 64bit versions .
https://msdn.microsoft.com/es-es/library/azure/jj573031.aspx#BKMK_testsrv
I realize that my machine is 32bit Server 2008 Standard
http://azure.microsoft.com/blog/2014/10/06/announcing-support-for-backup-of-windows-server-2008-with-azure-backup/
It occurred to me descompri the MARSAgentInstaller package.
Run the application, but being 32bit my system , I think the Agent application is 64bit Copies Azure .
For this throws an error commenting same .

In-place upgrade Windows 2008 to 2008R2 and effects on SharePoint

I have a SharePoint farm, with a WFE running on Windows 2008 64 bit. THe APP and SQL server both use 2008R2. It's a complicated setup, with many custom applications. Rather than a fresh install, we would prefer to maintain our current applications and configuration.
Can I perform an in-place 2008R2 upgrade? Will it affect SharePoint? The Farm?
Backup strategies?
Thanks,
Scott

Hi Scott,
Operating System in place upgrade is NOT supported with SharePoint 2010. It is recommended that building a new Win2008 R2 and restoring a backup of your SharePoint 2010.
For more information, you can have a look at the blogs:
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/8c638ca6-0edf-4d5d-a443-3841cb64f673/inplace-upgrade-from-windows-2008-to-2008-r2-breaks-sharepoint-2010?forum=sharepointadminprevious
Thanks,
Eric
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Sharepoint 2007 and SQL 2008 SP3 on Windows Server 2008 Enterprise SP2 (64-bit)

Is there any documentation we can check if SQL 2008 SP3 is compatible with Sharepoint 2007 SP2 or SP3? Both Sharepoint and SQL servers are running on separate Virtual machines (Windows Server 2008 Enterprise SP2(64-bit)). Currently DB is running on
SQL server 2008 SP2, and we would like to have SP3 loaded on it, but want to find if there is any compatibility issue?
Thanks in advance!
mh

I'm not aware of any known issues with SQL Server 2008 SP3 and SharePoint 2007. I did a quick check and saw one person reporting an issue with their Central Admin site after applying the SQL Server update, but that's it.
With that being said, I would strongly encourage you to test out the application of that SQL Server service pack in a non-production environment well before you apply it in production. There is always a chance that your environment has something set up in
it that would cause an unexpected issue, and the best way to get an idea of whether or not an issue exists is by doing it somewhere else first before you do it in prod.
John
MCITP and MCTS: SharePoint, Virtualization, Project Server 2007
My books on Amazon: The SharePoint 2010 Disaster Recovery Guide and
The SharePoint 2007 Disaster Recovery Guide.
My blog: My Central Admin.

SQL query is slow after upgrading from SQL 2008 to SQL 2008 R2

Hello
We were using SQL 2008 Standard, but after upgrading to R2, following query is much slower (takes 5 seconds instead of less than 1 second), how is this possible?
Regards, Hennie
SELECT
P.BSN,
P.Persnr,
P.Roepnaam,
P.Tussenvoegsels,
P.Achternaam,
P.Geslacht,
COALESCE (P.Achternaam + ', ' + P.Roepnaam + ' ' + P.Tussenvoegsels, P.Achternaam + ', ' + P.Roepnaam, P.Achternaam) AS naamvolledig,
P.Telmobiel,
P.Telvast,
P.Postcode,
G.groep,
COALESCE (RM.nieuweDag, GR.Dag) AS dag,
COALESCE (RM.nieuweDatum, GR.datum) AS datum,
DATEPART(ww, COALESCE (RM.nieuweDatum, GR.datum)) AS weeknummer,
DATEPART(yyyy, COALESCE (RM.nieuweDatum, GR.datum)) AS jaar,
CONVERT(VARCHAR(8),
  CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd,
   CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.begintijd2 ELSE R.begintijd END)
  ELSE COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd, GR.begintijd) END, 108) AS begintijdberekend,
CONVERT(VARCHAR(8),
  CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd,
   CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.eindtijd2 ELSE R.eindtijd END)
  ELSE COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd, GR.eindtijd) END, 108) AS eindtijdberekend,
CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN
   CONVERT(NCHAR(5), COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd,CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.begintijd2 ELSE R.begintijd END), 108) + '-' +
   CONVERT(NCHAR(5), COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd, CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.eindtijd2 ELSE R.eindtijd END), 108)
  ELSE CONVERT(NCHAR(5),COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd, GR.begintijd), 108) + '-' + CONVERT(NCHAR(5), COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd, GR.eindtijd), 108)
  END AS Tijdspanne,
CASE
  WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 AND R.id_relaties = 9 THEN 'Werk Intern'
  WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN R.relatienaam
  ELSE L.lokatie END AS Lokatieberekend,
R.relatienaam AS relatie,
L.IntExt,
RA.Omschrijving AS roosteractiviteit,
A.instroomdatum,
A.uitstroomdatum,
TT.trajecttype,
W.Naamvolledig AS Werkcoach,
A.ID_groepen,
T.ID_personen,
A.ID_werkcoaches,
CASE
  WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 AND R.id_relaties = 9 THEN 20
  WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN R.id_relaties
  ELSE L.ID_relaties END AS ID_lokatieberekend,
A.ID_relaties AS ID_relatie,
R.nummer2 AS capaciteit,
GR.ID_groepsroosters,
CAST(CASE WHEN foto IS NOT NULL THEN 'Ja' ELSE NULL END AS char(2)) AS Foto,
W.Email,
W.TelefoonMobiel,
W.TelefoonVast
FROM
dbo.personen AS P INNER JOIN
dbo.trajecten AS T ON T.ID_personen = P.ID_personen INNER JOIN
dbo.trajecttype AS TT ON T.ID_trajecttype = TT.ID_trajecttype INNER JOIN
dbo.trajectactiviteiten AS A ON A.ID_trajecten = T.ID_trajecten INNER JOIN
dbo.groepsroosters AS GR ON GR.ID_groepen = A.ID_groepen LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.roosteractiviteit AS RA ON GR.ID_roosteractiviteit = RA.ID_roosteractiviteit INNER JOIN
dbo.lokaties AS L ON GR.ID_lokaties = L.ID_lokaties INNER JOIN
dbo.werkcoaches AS W ON A.ID_werkcoaches = W.ID_werkcoaches INNER JOIN
dbo.groepen AS G ON A.ID_groepen = G.ID_groepen LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.relaties AS R ON A.ID_relaties = R.ID_relaties LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.roostermutaties AS RM ON P.ID_personen = RM.ID_personen AND GR.ID_groepsroosters = RM.ID_groepsroosters AND RM.aanwezig IS NULL
WHERE
(COALESCE (RM.nieuweDatum, GR.datum) BETWEEN GETDATE() - 1 AND GETDATE() + 13)
AND (COALESCE (DATEDIFF(day, COALESCE (RM.nieuweDatum, GR.datum), A.uitstroomdatum), 0) >= 0)
AND (DATEDIFF(day, A.instroomdatum, COALESCE (RM.nieuweDatum, GR.datum)) >= 0)
AND ((SELECT COUNT(*) AS Expr1
  FROM dbo.roostermutaties AS RM2
  WHERE (P.ID_personen = ID_personen)
  AND (GR.ID_groepsroosters = ID_groepsroosters)
  AND (CONVERT(VARCHAR(8), begintijdafwezig, 108) = CONVERT(VARCHAR(8),
  CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd,
  CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.begintijd2 ELSE R.begintijd END)
  ELSE COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd, GR.begintijd) END, 108)) AND
  (CONVERT(VARCHAR(8), eindtijdafwezig, 108) = CONVERT(VARCHAR(8), CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd,
  CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.eindtijd2 ELSE R.eindtijd END) ELSE COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd, GR.eindtijd) END, 108))) = 0)

We were using SQL 2008 Standard, but after upgrading to R2, following query is much slower (takes 5 seconds instead of less than 1 second), how is this possible?
It is not uncommon to experience performance problems following an upgrade when there are issues with original query. Non-sargable expressions like Olaf called out are often the culprit, as well as lack of useful indexes and statistics.
The optimizer cannot glean accurate row count estimates or use indexes efficiently so the resultant plan may not be optimal for the task at hand. It is only by happenstance that old plan performed better; it could just as well be the other way around,
but again only by chance since the optimizer is guessing.
You might also try using EXISTS instead of SELECT COUNT(*)...= 0:
AND EXISTS(SELECT *
FROM dbo.roostermutaties AS RM2
WHERE P.ID_personen = ID_personen
AND GR.ID_groepsroosters = ID_groepsroosters
AND CONVERT(VARCHAR(8), begintijdafwezig, 108) = CONVERT(VARCHAR(8),
CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd,
CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.begintijd2 ELSE R.begintijd END)
ELSE COALESCE (RM.nieuweBegintijd, GR.begintijd) END, 108)
AND CONVERT(VARCHAR(8), eindtijdafwezig, 108) = CONVERT(VARCHAR(8), CASE WHEN GR.ID_lokaties = 3 THEN COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd,
CASE WHEN GR.Tijdspan = 2 THEN R.eindtijd2 ELSE R.eindtijd END) ELSE COALESCE (RM.nieuweEindtijd, GR.eindtijd) END, 108))
Dan Guzman, SQL Server MVP, http://www.dbdelta.com

Upgrade windows 2003 standard to 2008 enterprise

Current Environment:
Windows Standard 2003 64 Bit Edition
VMware
EP 7.0 Eph1
We want to upgrade our windows version to Enterprise 2008 64 Bit.
Please let me know how to proceed with this ? How do we prepare the system to continue this upgrade without uninstall SAP
Thank you

> We want to upgrade our windows version to Enterprise 2008 64 Bit.
> Please let me know how to proceed with this ? How do we prepare the system to continue this upgrade without uninstall SAP
There are ways of doing in-place upgrades (see Note 1494740 - SAP system migration from Windows 2003 to 2008 (R2) 64-bit) but since the hardware drivers changed from 2003 to 2008 you may have a hard time getting the system back up after you do an in-place upgrade.
I would do a homogeneous system copy, that's the safest way.
Markus

I upgraded to Mavericks and my 2008 iMac is slower than slow.

I have a 2008 IMac with 2GB Ram and 320GB HD. I have been upgrading through out and up to Mountain Lion never had any issues with the new OS systems. I upgraded to Mavericks about 2 months ago and the system continues to get slower and slower to where I really do not want to use it any longer. I spoke to someone at apple and they said from all of the upgrades there are programs taking up overhead that no longer are needed. If I bring the computer in they can help resolve the issue. The Apple store is about an hour drive from where I live. Seems to me that there must be an easy fix. I am not that computer literater and switched from Windows to Apple because of the reputation. Now all I do is watch that colored pinwheel on my screen more than anything else. Does anyone have a simple suggestion or do I need to take it to Apple and have to pay them to fix what they have caused.

RAM is pretty cheap these days. It will depend on the exact model of iMac you have. Just for a rough idea I took a look here Computer memory upgrades for Apple iMac (Early 2008) Desktop/PC from Crucial.com and found a 2 x 2GB upgrade kit for $72.
Most of the sites that sell RAM have instructional videos you can watch so you can get an idea of how difficult the installation might be for you. I've installed RAM on my MacBook Pro and it was not very difficult, and the iMac installation looks easier than that. But that would depend on your own comfort level with doing it. I've done a lot of this sort of installation over the years on my Macs so I'm very comfortable. But you do have to be careful, as the innards of a Mac can be very sensitive to static electricity, and it is possible to damage components if you don't follow directions carefully. But I would see if there are software issues that can be addressed first before you go investing in more RAM.

In place upgrade Windows 2008 and SQL 2008

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for