In sales order for the condition type MWST, **Tax code** is displaying wron

Hi
In sales order for the condition type MWST, *Tax code* is displaying wrongly at header level i.e. FF instead of AO (under account determination tab)
AO tax is 0% but for FF it is 19%
I have checked with the Access sequence it is picking access 08 correctly according to this it should show AO in tax code field for MWST but it is not so..
There is a manual change for tax classification for material master in va02 initially it was blank now it is changed to ' 0 ' is any way influencing....?
Even if I consider material tax classification and customer tax code  should not be FF because  tax code  FF is not maintained for the combination of access sequences for condition type MWST
Please help me.
Rajendra Prasad

Dear Rajendra,
There is a manual change for tax classification for material master in va02 initially it was blank now it is changed to ' 0 ' is any way influencing....?
Definitely material Tax classification will influence to determine the Tax code.
-->So Make sure that customer and material master having proper tax classification indicator.
-->Have you Update the price after changing the tax classification in the sales order.by going to item dat -->condition tab then click on Update push button bottom of the conditions screen.
-->Once again the check the condition record maintanence also for your MWST access sequence.
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Similar Messages

  • Condition type MWST tax code A1 does not exist

    Hi all,
    I'm facing the problem while I'm releasing Billing doc to Accounting. This is the error
    Condition type MWST tax code A1 does not exist
    Message no. FF762
    Diagnosis
    When calculating tax, the system tried to determine the condition amount and the condition number from tables A003 and A053 using the specified condition type and tax code. However, no values were found there.
    System Response
    The specified amount cannot be posted in FI.
    Procedure
    Check the Customizing settings for the specified tax code. Check whether the validity period (possible with tax jurisdictions) is defined.
    I have already checked FTXP, and the Tax Code is already there.
    I have already checked the condition record, and it is already there,
    Maybe I have missed something...?
    Thanks before for all your help
    Regards,
    Rizki Harris

    Hi Typewriter,
    1. Check in a previously created invoice, accounting document - the tax code? (FB03) is it A1?
       --> the tax code is A1
    2. In VK12, MWST do you have other values of % tax (e.g. 0%). In a sales order, give appropriate Tax classification values for CMR, MMR so that MWST value = 0. Create invoice and check if you are getting the message
       --> in VK12 for Key Combination Domestic Taxes :
            TaxCl1Cust   TaxCl.Mat     Name                                 Amount     Valid from    Valid To         Tax Code
            0                    1                  Tax Exempt  Full Tax                          25.07.2011   31.12.9999    A0
            1                    0                  Liable For Taxe No Tax                        01.01.2008   31.12.9999    A1
            1                    1                  Liable forTaxeFull Tax              10       25.07.2008  31.12.9999    A1
         --> I still don't understand what do you mean by CMR, MMR ?
    3. Condition type MWST is not allowed to be processed manually..
    Regards,
    Rizki Harris

  • Error-- Condition type MWST tax code A0 does not exist

    I have an Invoice and it didnu2019t pass for accounting entry.
    The error is promptu201D Condition type MWST tax code A0 does not existu201D, It never came at the time of Sales order creation.
    Diagonosis says the following
    When calculating tax, the system tried to determine the condition amount and the condition number from tables A003 and A053 using the specified condition type and tax code. However, no values were found there.
    Procedure says the following thing
    Check the Customizing settings for the specified tax code. Check whether the validity period (possible with tax jurisdictions) is defined.
    Please guide.

    Christiano,
    First let analyze the situation.
    1. Execute Tcode VA02 --> Item Details --> Conditions tab --> Click Analysis button. Try to find for condition Type MWST whether values are flowing.
    If it is not there then you have not maintained condition record.
    2. Tax Code.
        Execute FTXP Tcode , Check For A0 Tax code check whether you have maintained any value. if yes then check in condition record, whether you created record with Tax Code - A0
    If everything  above is perfect and correct
    3. Check Copy Controls and Pricing type
    Check the Validation period (it should not be the problem)
    Check and Revert
    Regards
    Sathya
    Edited by: Sathya Pavan Yedavalli venkata on Apr 21, 2009 2:06 PM

  • Condition type MWST tax code S0 does not exist

    Hi, Pls advice how can I eliminate that idoc error message:
    "Condition type MWST tax code S0 does not exist"
    Should I maintain tr VK13 as well?

    Does S0 exist in FTXP?
    If not create it there?
    If it does, check the config to make sure it picks up a GL account and account key MWS

  • Tax value is not picked up correctly for the condition type in SO creation

    Hi All,
    I have a issue in Picking up Tax value correctly for the condition type in SO Creation.
    Actual Issue:
    When creating the sales order manually,
    tax value is picked up correctly for one condition type: ISS3.
    When the Sales Order is created via Idoc using the function module 'idoc_input_orders', tax value is not picked for same condition type: ISS3.
    We need to find out why the value for the condition type 'ISS3' is not picked in this way!
    Can anybody solve this issue!
    What can be the reason which is stopping picking up tax value for condition type: ISS3 when Sales Order is created via F.M 'IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS'! While it picked up the same while creating Sales Order manuallly.
    Thanks in advance.
    Thanks,
    Deep.

    Hi All,
    Can anybody give the solution for above posted issue!
    Working:
    When creating the sales order manually,
    tax value is picked up correctly for the condition type ISS3.
    Actual Issue:
    When the Order is created via Idoc using the function module 'idoc_input_orders',
    tax value is not picked .
    I need to find out why the value for the condition type 'ISS3' is not picked.
    I have debugged the issue from WE19 but upto Conditions tab it is picking up tax value but then it is becoming zero again it remains zero after saving SO.
    But Manually tax value is picked up for condition type ISS3 and remains same after saving order.
    I have debugged it several times fro WE19 but not able to find route cause for the issue.
    What can be the issue over here!
    Can anybody give me solution for the same!
    Thanks in advance.
    Thanks,
    Deep.

  • Searching for Sales Order for the given Customer PO Number Pattern in BAPI

    Hi,
         I have developed a BAPI which retrieves all the Sales Orders for a given Customer (Sold-To). The Following are the Input Parameters given in the Function Module (RFC).
    Customer Number (Mandatory)
    From Date (Optional)
    To Date (Optional)
    Sales Order Number(Optional)
    Customer PO Number(Optional)
    Now, when the Customer PO Number is populated, it will come as a Pattern, say 9ab* and I need to retrieve all the Sales Orders with PO Number starting with 9ab.
    When I am trying to retrieve, it is giving different set of output based on the Case specified in the Customer PO Number Pattern. Lets say, if I give 9ab, I get 200 Records but if I give 9AB, I get only 5 to 6 Records.
    As I have understood from the Standard Transaction VA03, it has a Search Help VMVAA which retrieves all the Sales Orders for the given PO Number pattern irrespective of the Case, that is Lower Case, Upper Case or Mix of Upper and Lower Case.
    I can see the Code in the Search Help Exit but couldn't find useful piece of code which I can implement in my BAPI to simulate the same.
    Can somebody help me on this?
    Thanks,
    Venkat.

    Hi Sudhir,
             I think you did not understand what my problem is. What I mean to say is, for Customer X, the PO Number could be 9abc and for Customer Y, the PO Number Could be 9ABC.
           So, according to your logic, if I translate it to Upper Case, it will give the Sales Order details of Customer Y to Customer X.
          And more over, SAP stores the PO Number as it is entered in the Sales Order Screen (VA01).
        What if the Customer PO Number for Customer X is 9aBcDeFgH? and the PO Number for Customer Y is 9AbCdEf?
       Hope you've understood my question.
    Thanks,
    Venkat.

  • Error message FF762 " Condition type MWVS tax code A8 does not extist- MIRO

    Dear all,
    after support packagesi mplemented , I've the problem with transaction MIRO,
    because I cannot released the invoic for the folloqiong error:
    FF762 " Condition type MWVS tax code A8 does not extist.
    Please, could you help me.
    Thanks in advance for your cooperation
    Gaetano

    Hi,
    Go to FTXP and give the tax code A8.
    In the resultant screen, select the condition type MWVS, and link the condition type to an account key.
    Make sure all the other tax determination settings are fine
    Now, try the transaction it should work fine.
    Hope this helps you

  • Vendor invoice for sales order delivery cost condition type

    Dear SAP guru,
    We have a scenario where we have added certain delivery cost in the sales order as condition type. There will be an accrual posting out of this condition type. We have defined the vendor code in the condition record.
    The question is how to generate an invoice on this vendor with reference to Sales order, as there will not be any purchase order for the delivery cost.
    Thanks in advance.
    Rama

    did you already apply note 1585042
    Symptom
    You create a Sales Order with multiple third-party items.  The system
    automatically generates an MM Purchase Requisition with multiple line
    items.  Each of these line items can have a different fixed vendor
    (field EBAN-FLIEF).
    In the Customizing transaction VOV7, the Sales Item Category (usually
    TAS for Third Party) has the field ALEKZ 'Create PO Automatically'
    selected.  Therefore, one or multiple follow-on Purchase Orders will
    also be created from the Requisition data during the same Sales Order
    creation workflow.  The system creates a separate Purchase Order for
    each fixed vendor (supplier) found among the Requisition items.
    During this ALE PO creation, if one of the Requisition items fails to
    successfully create a PO, the next relevant PO created may have an
    incorrect vendor in its header.  The vendor in the PO header may not
    match the fixed vendor that was designated in the Requisition line item.
    Solution
    Implement the attached code corrections.   After this correction,
    regardless of whether one of the Requisition items fails to generate a
    PO, any PO that is successfully created during the process will have the
    correct assigned vendor.

  • Function Module for getting the Sales Price for a condition type

    Hi,
    I am looking for a standard function module to which I can pass my condition type(new customizing) and it will return the sales price. The customer is going to create some new condition type to manitain the sales price. I'll have the necessary information like material/sales org/distribution channel, customer and need the standard function module to read the condition records for that condition type(as configured) and give me the price. PLease help if you know of a standard function module performing this.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Malthi

    Hi malthi ,
    welcome to sdn
    for material sales area u can look for the validations is table MVKE.
    the classification of the conditions is in tables like A901, a902 etc which in my opinion holds the condition types per classification .
    put a A* in se11 and this will give the list of tables per classification .
    u need to get the conditions as per kschl and dmbtr and
    etc..
    like this ..
    Get Condition Values for Material/Plant combination
      IF NOT i_a916[] IS INITIAL.
        SELECT knumh kappl kschl krech
               kbetr konwa kpein kmein
               INTO TABLE i_konp
               FROM konp
               FOR ALL ENTRIES IN i_a916
               WHERE knumh EQ i_a916-knumh AND
                     kappl EQ i_a916-kappl AND
                     kschl EQ i_a916-kschl AND
                     loevm_ko NE 'X'.
      ENDIF.
    Get Condition Values for Material/Plant/Ordertype/
    Customer combination
      IF NOT i_a925[] IS INITIAL.
        SELECT knumh kappl kschl  krech
               kbetr konwa kpein kmein
               APPENDING TABLE i_konp
               FROM konp
               FOR ALL ENTRIES IN i_a925
               WHERE knumh EQ i_a925-knumh AND
                     kappl EQ i_a925-kappl AND
                     kschl EQ i_a925-kschl AND
                     loevm_ko NE 'X'.
      ENDIF.
    just check this Fm if u can apply ur condition over here ..
    ME_GET_PRICE_CONDITION
    regards,
    VIjay.

  • Sales order for pipeline material type..

    Hi All,
    How can we raise the sales order for pipeline material..
    Is schedule lines will be there for the sales order raised for pipeline material???
    Rgds,
    Pavan

    Hi
    Seems you working on  IS Utilities, please corerct if Wrong and if I am wrong to guess you are working on IS Utilities then the next story dosn't make any sence.
    PIPEline material type is used for Materials such as oil, power, or water that flow into the production process directly from a pipeline, line, or other type of conduit. Since pipeline materials are always available, they are not planned.
    To answer specifically what you asked would be as follows:
    1. The fact that material type is PIPE from an SD standpoint is irrelevant
    2. lets consider your PIPEline material is power, your UOM should be Kilowatt hours and establish price for it.
    3. "deliver" the material and bill it.
    However, taking the whole business context of sale of electricity into account why you want to sell PIPEline material without using IS Utilities. Typically electrical utiltity requirements have some unique challenges not easily met by SD:
    1. Amount to be billed to the customer is from meter readings.
    2. The bill to the customer ( at least in North America) is not so much of an invoice as opposed to statement of accounts that includes meter readings, consumption history etc.
    I will suggest to look into IS Utilties first before getting into SD.

  • Tax not calculated in MIRO for the condition type JVCD

    Hi,
    We made some new different tax code and attached with JVCD , its calculating in PO but in MIRO calculation part not done but for other condition type ,JVRD,JVRN system calculating well...
    Please tell me some way why not system calculating in case of JVCD and JVCN for capital case..
    Thanks in Advance,
    Dharmveer

    Hi,
    We totally agreed with you and already we checked our configuration part is OK.Actually we want to map some process where we captured excise in GR but no need to take credit i.e. to post the excise in J1IEX,so we do not have to post our cenvat/modvat entry in MIRO but we need to calculate VAT whether it is deductible or non deductible.So far this thing is concerned,we made separate tax code which we use at time of MIRO posting and in configuration we did not attached the tax code in logitics-basic excise -assign to company code. Because once we attached here , system asking to make to pass furst RG part2 entry then it allows to post MIRO entry which we do not want .So please understand this scenario is different and we got the success for JVRN/JVRD for VAT but getting issue in case of capital VAT where system does not calculate tax for JVCN/JVCD .....where we want to process MIRO without posting J1IEX..
    Please thing and analyse ..give some helping response..
    Thanks,
    Dharmveer

  • Checking for the condition types using case statement

    hi folks,
    I have a lot of condition types that I have to check for and I am using case statement to do that. The code goes like this.
    case wac-kschl.
            when 'ZRAT' OR 'ZAGR' OR 'ZRCR' OR
                  'Y098' OR 'Y007' OR 'ZREW' OR 'Y106'        OR 'ZTSR' OR 'Y127' OR 'Y125' OR 'Y126' OR 'Y124' OR 'Y157' OR 'Y092' OR 'Y085' OR 'Y090' OR 'ZMZD'
    OR 'Y215' OR 'Y214' OR 'Y111' OR 'ZC$D' OR 'ZAUD'.
    up till here it is working on errors and when I add few more condition types to the case statement it is throwing the error.
    I have to check for all the condition types out here.
    How can I correct it? Is there a better way to do it?
    thanks
    Santhosh

    Hi Santhosh,
    I think that your CASE statement has a flaw. The line length of one of the lines is too large. You need to insert a carriage-return to shorten it (or press the button 'Pretty Printer').
    The code would look nicer like this:[code]  CASE wac-kschl.
        WHEN 'ZRAT' OR 'ZAGR' OR 'ZRCR' OR 'Y098' OR 'Y007' OR 'ZREW'
          OR 'Y106' OR 'ZTSR' OR 'Y127' OR 'Y125' OR 'Y126' OR 'Y124'
          OR 'Y157' OR 'Y092' OR 'Y085' OR 'Y090' OR 'ZMZD' OR 'Y215'
          OR 'Y214' OR 'Y111' OR 'ZC$D' OR 'ZAUD' OR 'Z001' OR 'Z002'
          OR 'Z003' OR 'Z004' OR 'Z005' OR 'Z006' OR 'Z007' OR 'Z008'
          OR 'Z009' OR 'Z010' OR 'Z011' OR 'Z012' OR 'Z013' OR 'Z014'.
        Do your thing here
          WRITE: / 'OK'.
        WHEN OTHERS.
          WRITE: / 'NOT OK'.
      ENDCASE.[/code]If this will not work for you, you could try a different approach:[code]* Local definition
      DATA:
        var_list(1024).
    Build variable string for checking
      CONCATENATE 'ZRAT ZAGR ZRCR Y098'
                  'Y007 ZREW Y106 ZTSR'
                  'Y127 Y125 Y126 Y124'
                  'Y157 Y092 Y085 Y090'
                  'ZMZD Y215 Y214 Y111'
                  'ZC$D ZAUD'
             INTO var_list
        SEPARATED BY space.
    Check if the correct value is supplied
      IF var_list CS wac-kschl.
      Do your thing here
        WRITE: / 'OK'.
      ENDIF.[/code]Hope this helps you a bit.
    Regards,
    Rob.

  • Internet sales - List for the delivery type

    Hello everybody,
    In ISA, when you are connected, and you go in the basket page. You have an list option for the delivery type with "Standard", "Pick up" etc...
    I want to modify the element list. Exactly i want to delete one of teh option.
    How could i do that.
    Somebody knows how to do that?

    I found the solution, you can configure in the shopadmin, the option you want to display in the catalog page.

  • Set as filter VKORG instead of KUNNR For the Mess. type DESADV T.code BD64

    Hi,
    I am looking to set as sales organization as a filter in the distribution model (Transaction code BD64) for the message type DESADV. So I have added an entry for the field VKORG in the transaction code BD59 as well as BD95 and I have deleted the entries for KUNNR in BD59 transaction code .
    But still I am getting a message that In the ALE distribution customer model several recipient systems for IDOCs with message type DESADV and filter object type u2018KUNNRu2019.
    As I am looking to remove the filter type from KUNNR value to VKORG, so could please anyone can give me some suggestions so that it will be helpful for me.
    Thanks you very much in advance for your support.

    > i  am gonna generate parther profile automatically.
    >
    > so,
    >
    > i choose menu item "environment--> generate parter profile"  using bd64 in XI to open a screen,and fill partner system,clicked execute button.
    >
    > but a message occurs on the screen:
    >
    > No message have been defined for the selection conditions in the model.
    >
    >
    > what' s wrong with the problem?
    Not sure if I catch on, did you run bd64 on XI? ... Generally, after you have created model view on sender R/3 system, you should save it. Then, chose a model view for which you want to generate a partner profile and go to the menu "environment--> generate parter profile". Then partner profile will be generated.
    Regards,
    Jakub

  • New condition type, new tax codes

    Hi,
    I have created new condition type for tax procedure TAXIN. I have defined the account key for it. The condition type is basically for exempted input tax transaction. Then I created new tax codes by using the new condition type. The percentage of the tax codes is 0 as it is exempted.
    When I am trying to post invoice by using above taxcodes, it gives me error that the tax code is not defined in taxprocedure TAXIN.
    What could be the reason?

    Did you create the tax code in the development or prouction system?
    If in development you need to export the tax code by going to FTXP and selecting Tax Code -> Transport -> Export. Then when you release the transport you should go to the Production system and select Tax Code -> Transport -> Import.

Maybe you are looking for