Incorrect Commitment item derived for GR/IR for service orders

Hi Guys
We are currently on support pack 14, release 200 of EA-PS. I'm experiencing problems in with FM account assignment derivation. Especially with regards to service entry sheets.
The system is deriving account assignments well from goods reciepts to invoice reciept stage. The problem kicks in when clearing GR/IR - clearing using transaction code MR11. The system derives the expenditure commitment item using the GR/IR account in FI. I created assignments for my commitment items to be derived from G/L accounts as there is a one to one relationship between my G/L account and commitment item.
This condition results in a debit and credit entry being posted to the same commitment item in one transaction. I would expect only one item to be posted to the expense commitment item as it is the only one in the two line document whose financial transaction field set to 30. The GR/IR commitment's financial field is set to 40.
Regards
Thuso Mudau.

Hi,
First thing I's do is to activate the FMDERIVE trace and see what is this commitment item derived from.
See what GL accounts are posted in the financial doc, and have a look at the log to see if the commitment item is derived directly from those acocunts.
Let me know the results...
Shahaf Yaari

Similar Messages

Bapi for technically complete of service order

Hi all,
I need to call a bapi to technically complete a service order.
I dono what are the values to be passed into the bapi..
please provide the passing parameters of the bapi.
Thanks and Regards,
Vidhya

Hi vidhya,
You can use the BAPI 'BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN' for technical complete of service order.
Pass below parameters as input.
IT_METHODS :
Populate the values to methods
wa_methods-refnumber = '00001'.
wa_methods-objecttype = ''HEADER'.
wa_methods-method = ''TECHNICALCOMPLETE'
wa_methods-objectkey = v_aufnr. "Order number
APPEND wa_methods TO it_methods.
CLEAR : wa_methods.
Populate the values to methods
wa_methods-refnumber ='00001'.
wa_methods-objecttype = space.
wa_methods-method = 'SAVE'.
wa_methods-objectkey = v_aufnr. "Order number
APPEND wa_methods TO it_methods.
Afetr calling this BAPi call BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT to commit the chnages to data base.
Hope this may be helpful.
Regards,
Sravanthi.V

Fund Center & Commitment ITem Derivation for Service Procurement

HI,
My scenario is for construction business. There are number of services which are procured. PO is raised to the vendor. All these services gets booked under one GL account.
Each of this service is budgeted separately. I have created separate CI for all these services (But one FC). I am not able to derive the FC & CI automatically for individual service.
Can anyone help us in this.
Thanks & Regards,
Ajay

Thanks Eli.
I have now maintained derivation rule. With some BADI's & exits system is picking up the correct commitment item against service master. Now the problem is, if PO is for single service then system checks budget correctly. But once I put multiple service master (having separate CI in FMDERIVE), system picks up commt item against line item 0010 & post both the transaction against that CI consuming budget.
I need entry to be posted to individual commt items.
Let me know if any changes are required to be done.
Thanks & Regards,
Ajay
Edited by: Ajay Gupte on Jun 11, 2011 3:52 PM

GR/IR - Commitment item derivation

Hi everyone,
In our case (ECC 6) the GL acct number and CI number are always the same. However, when i look at a couple documents that have GR/IR posting, the GL account and commitment item are different. I cannot see any possible derivation rule that can possibly cause this. I did see other discussions in this forum about a 'fmderive-bypass' for GR / IR transactions. Can someone explain in more detail what this is and if it is relevant in my scenario? Secondly if if GR/IR GL account 123 derives commiitment item 456 (instead of CI 123), then wher exactly is this set? what setting do i need to look into to find out where and why this is happening?
Thank you,

Hi ,
As per the issue that you are facing , you have defined the same commitment item for same GL A/c .
The possible reasons for the same are the derivation rules that you have defined in FMDERIVER .
Kindly check the derivation strategy that you have defined - FMDERIVE .
Secondly check the relevant GL A/c what is the commitment item that you have enterd there .
For having a check on how the derivation is taking place during the transaction , you can always activate the trace and see how the commitment items are getting populated .
for activating the trace do the following : go to FMDERIVE - double click the relevant derivation strategy - click on the test button and in the bottom u will see an option for trace activate that and you will find that a green signal is populate at the right end corner .
do take care to check the transaction from the same user ID where in you have activated the trace .
Cheers ,
Dewang

Commitment Item derivation from General Ledger

Brothers!
we want the system should derive the Commitment item from the general ledger master record.But the system is not deriving the Commitment item from General ledger.
But as We read in the BCS Documentation, there are two way for derivation of Commitement Item. one from GL and other defining the derivation rule.
please advise us, why not the system is deriving the Commitment itm from GL.
My client also want the same
Thanks

Hi,
Please check the attached note:
839488 Derivation of commitment item from G/L account:
As of Release EA-PS 2.00, you can use a derivation rule of type
"Function Module" with the function module
FMDT_READ_MD_ACCOUNT_COMPANY "Read Account Master Data"
predefined by SAP in your derivation strategy (Transaction
FMDERIVE). The function module can return all fields of the G/L
account master record. You can receive the commitment item either
in the technical SAP internal format (field FIPOS, 14 characters)
or directly in the format that is generally used (field
CMMT_ITEM, 24 characters). The company code and G/L account are
already preset as a source field, and the commitment item as a
target field, in the 24-character format.
So, you should define a derivation strategy (FMDERIVE) as type Function module and use function FMDT_READ_MD_ACCOUNT_COMPANY
I hope this helps.
regards, Mar

COPA derivation for Technician field of Service Order

Hi All,
I have created a character field WW001 for populating COPA documents from "Technician" field of "Service Order". I have checked and found that AFRU table is having Service Order No. (AUFNR) as well Technician (PERNR). But my problem is while creting AFRU "Table Lookup" using T-Code KEDR, the corresponding COPA character is not coming in the origin, hence I am unable to get the charcter value of said Technician field from Service Order to COPA document.
Is there any other table availabe in the system for KEDR setup or shall I need to go with User Exit?
Thanks in advance.
Rupali
Edited by: Rupali Sinha on Mar 11, 2009 2:57 AM

Hi Rupali,
I am very much sure that when there is WW characteristics, you need to go with Table Lookup under KEDR. But, if the desired combination of source/ origin and targets are not available there, we need to go with user exit. Take a help of your ABAP Consultant for user exit.
Thanks & Regards,
Robin

Commitment item error at the time of Service entry Sheet

Hi experts,
I have created a service PO, in which I have given the GL. Now when I am going to post the service entry sheet, I am changing the GL account. But system is picking the commitment item with reference to the GL earlier provided in PO.
I want to pick the commitment item with reference to the GL I am providing in service entry sheet.
Pl suggest how can I achieve this.
Regards,
Ankit Agarwal

Hi Eli,
Thanx for your response.
But derivation rule is same for all GL. Whether we put GL in PO or in Service entry sheet, system will derive the commitment item from the same single rule.
Regards,
Ankit Agarwal

Transaction code for list of pending service orders

Hi All,
Could any body tell me what is the tcode for pending service orders?
Ex: I have a service PO with one line item and 10 services under that line item in service tab of the PO item details.
I have made service entry for 8 items. And I have such type of serveral POs.
Through which TCode I can get the list of pending service orders (partial and fully pending)?
Thanks in advance
Ram

Hi dear,
You can use ME2L,ME2M,ME2N with Purchasing Organisation as SERV & selection criteria as WE101.
You can also use T codes MSRV3,MSRV6,here you can make use of Order quantity and Quantity released.
You can also use ME2S make use of Entered Qty , Entered Value and Accpted Quantity and Accepted value fields in the report.
Edited by: Deepak Kulkarni on Mar 21, 2011 3:53 PM

User exit for profitability segment in service order settlement rule

Does anybody know if exit EXIT_SAPLKEAK_001 works for the profitability segment creation during the creation of a settlement rule of a service order?
The context is the following: the company uses service orders which are settled periodically (it receives revenue from sales order which is posted to the service orders at time of billing, and also costs at time of goods issue). The profitability segment in the settlement rule of the service order needs to be the same as the one from the billing document that posted to the order.
Can I use EXIT_SAPLKEAK_001 to find the characteristics from the billing document and populate it in the PSG of the settlement rule? If yes, could this be applied to only one specific service order type?
Thank you.

Hi
If your settlement is triggered by a batch or is triggered by a workflow exit EXIT_SAPLKEAK_001 is not run. From release 5.00 on characteristic groups are indeed not considered any more during batch input processes because there were problems before with initial chars of a CO-PA line item resulting from a batch input process that actually shouldn't be initial.
Refer SAP Note 581739, which put an end to usage of char groups during batch input processes. Also refer SAP Note 142628.
Regards
Sanil Bhandari
Edited by: Sanil K Bhandari on Jun 23, 2011 10:12 AM

Authorization for Warranty Maintainance in Service Order

Hi,
I am working on CRM 5.0.When user is creating service order at item level under warranty tab, there is option for maintaining the warranty and accounting indicator manually.
I want to restrict the user from doing it.Can anyone suggest some solution for the same.
Pls suggest any authorization object instead of Badi's..
The same should be applicable for PCUI as well.
Thanks,
PePe

Hi,
If u manage to get related authorization object for fields of warranty tab then also i m not sure with using same object u can control from portal (PCUI).
Better bet is to create new bliview for u r transaction and hide or make fields read only which u want to restrict.
Also refer below link for better understanding.
Authorisation Object to Restrict user for Manual Wty assignment in Service
Regards,
DD's

Multiple 'F3' Quality Notifications for defects from single Service Order

Those of you working w/ the QM module no doubt know that if a failure is recorded against an inspection characteristic linked to a Production Order (Order category 10), that SAP standard functionality creates a Defect document (Quality Notification type 'F3'). Any subsequent failures recorded that are linked to that same Production Order (as well as the material & serial number) are recorded, as additional line item defectes, on that same 'F3' Quality Notification.
HOWEVER, I have found when failures are recorded against inspection characteristics for a Maintenance Order (Order Category 30), a new Defect document (Quality Notification type 'F3') is created for each failure that is recorded. Why is this?
My client wants only a single 'F3' Quality Notification to be created for any and all failures that are recorded against a single Maintenance Order. I do not see any way to accomplish this w/o a core mod. Understanding WHY SAP treats these two order categories differently will go a long way to assisting me in designing an adequate solution.
Thanks for your help.

A couple more pieces of information....
1. We are currently running SAP Enterprise (4.7).
2. If I go to SPRO -> 'Quality Management' -> 'Inspection Lot Creation' -> 'Maintain Inspection Types', and display the details for Inspection Type 14 (which we use for Service Orders) the check box for 'One Q-notification per insp. lot' is active. Clearly the system is not processing a single Quality Notification per inspection lot on service orders.
Your assistance is greatly appreciated. Happy New Year

Report for Material Issued against Service Orders But not Billed.

Hi Experts,
For CRM Service Orders Based on the Reservation number generated in CRM we will make the Goods issue document in ECC.
My Question In CRM Do we have any standard report to see Material issued against CRM Service orders but not billed. i.e. Work in progress.
Thanks in Advance,
Abhinesh

Hi Vivek,
What I wanted to say that you won't get information from VAV about billing since as far as I know it doesn't contain any relevant table.
You should try create a query using LIKP-LIPS-(joint type: left outer)-VBRK. This will connect deliveries to billing document, you can also get SO number. Please try this.
(Sorrowully I don't know which logical database would be good for you)
BR
Csaba

"No transaction type is available for creating a transaction" service order

Hi all,
I am new in IC .
I try to create service order or service ticket for incoming calls
We are using CRM 7.0
After I confirm the account I try to create service order
But no screen displayed and error "No transaction type is available for creating a transaction" occurs
in customizing there is a transaction type SRVO, also I copied it to ZRVO
But here how can I define that this transaction type is assigned to this application??
Please reply in detail steps.
Thank you.

Hi Rupesh,
Thanks for your reply..
I made a lot of controls but I can't find where I am wrong..
My senario is, taking phones, create interaction record and create order for further investigation.
I copied IC_AGENT role.
I copied transaction type 0010 to Z010
I create business transaction named ZBTP for transaction type Z010
I made Define Transaction Types for Navigation for Z010
Then Define Business Role -> Assign Function Profiles
Here I assign my business transaction ZBTP to IC_BT function profile
But when I connect tot the system with user having this business role
I can create interaction record with type Z010, it is ok.
When I press Service Order it gives this error.
Work center id for Service order is : IC_UIU_SVO
I copied my business role from IC_AGENT, and here this work center id was not active
In my business role I made it active. Is this work center can't used in IC senario
Also how can I understand which transaction type is needed for it??
If I know which transaction type is needed to create service order or service ticket under IC, then I will control it of course..
I also copied transaction type TSVO(service IC) to ZSVO and do the above things for this type too..
But nothing changed..
Please help !!

User-exit for default values in service order

Hi,
i use EXIT QQMA0025 (EXIT_SAPLIQS0_017) to set some default values by creating
a service notification.
Is there some exit or badi to do the same for service orders. I don't want to use TPMUS.
Regards, Dieter

I create this thread in SD, because
i don't get any answers.
Regards, Dieter

How can i retrieve Items and Dates from an specific Service Order in a Report?

Hi Partners,
i was debbuging a lot without a good solution,
My team develop a new report (SE38 Report) to list on the screen an specific Service Order (BTQSrvOrd) with their corresponding Items & Dates (BTHeaderDates)
Here is my code (Attached on Message), i reach the data of the service order but i need to get the children information for Items & Dates but i saw thar those 2 types are in a 4 lower level and it's a little difficult to access througt code.
Regards.

Let me get this straight.....You lost your phone. You never backed it up, either to your computer or to a cloud service.
How in the world would you expect to get data back?

Incorrect Commitment item derived for GR/IR for service orders

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for