Indexes are in unusable state

hi
i am beginner....
indexes are in unusable state...
how can i make it actual state

Maybe you can use
alter index your_index_name rebuild online;?

Similar Messages

Partition of such index is in unusable state

Hi,
We have upgraded the system 3O.B to BI 7.0 after upgrade we are getting following dump in the system for cube while accessing
Database error text........: "ORA-01502: index 'SAPPRW./BIC/FZUCCA_C1~100' or partition of such index is in unusable state"
How to rebuild the signal index in BI ?

Hi,
I am getting a similar dump for some master data. Have you managed to solve the problem? I have process chain, and everything seems to work correctly, but the system administrator informs us that we are getting system dumps.
Please inform how to solve the problem.
Thank you for your help.
Ravi
e.g.
ORA-01502: index 'SAPSR3./BIC/B0000521000KE' or partition of such index is in unusable state
ORA-01502: index 'SAPSR3./BIC/B0000539000KE' or partition of such index is in unusable state
ORA-01502: index 'SAPSR3./BIC/B0000546000KE' or partition of such index is in unusable state
ORA-01502: index 'SAPSR3./BIC/B0000563000KE' or partition of such index is in unusable state
ORA-01502: index 'SAPSR3./BIC/B0000569000KE' or partition of such index is in unusable state
ORA-01502: index 'SAPSR3./BIC/B0000689000KE' or partition of such index is in unusable state
ORA-01502: index 'SAPSR3./BIC/B0000691000KE' or partition of such index is in unusable state
ORA-01502: index 'SAPSR3./BIC/B0000696000KE' or partition of such index is in unusable state
ORA-01502: index 'SAPSR3./BIC/B0000697000KE' or partition of such index is in unusable state
ORA-01502: index 'SAPSR3./BIC/B0000701000KE' or partition of such index is in unusable state
ORA-01502: index 'SAPSR3./BIC/B0000703001KE' or partition of such index is in unusable state
ORA-01502: index 'SAPSR3./BIC/B0000715000KE' or partition of such index is in unusable state
ORA-01502: index 'SAPSR3./BIC/B0000828001KE' or partition of such index is in unusable state
ORA-01502: index 'SAPSR3./BIC/B0000856000KE' or partition of such index is in unusable state
ORA-01502: index 'SAPSR3./BIC/B0000872000KE' or partition of such index is in unusable state

Error in Update optimizer statistics - index is in unusable state

Hello,
we have this error in log Check and update optimizer statistics:
12.02.2009     23:21:20     'BEGIN DBMS_STATS.GATHER_TABLE_STATS (OWNNAME => '"SAPPB1"', TABNAME => '"/BIC/FZPPC0002"', ESTIMATE_PERCENT => 10, METHOD_OPT =
12.02.2009     23:21:20     ORA-20000: index "SAPPB1"."/BIC/FZPPC0002~010" or partition of such index is in unusable state
12.02.2009     23:21:20     ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_STATS", line 13452
12.02.2009     23:21:20     ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_STATS", line 13472
12.02.2009     23:21:20     ORA-06512: at line 1
12.02.2009     23:21:20     BR0886E Checking/collecting statistics failed for table SAPPB1./BIC/FZPPC0002
i can temporary fix this problem when i delete and recreate index via SE14, but this help only for one next running update statistics, every next running update statistics has same error: index "SAPPB1"."/BIC/FZPPC0002~010" or partition of such index is in unusable state. Exist any definitive solution for this problem. Thanks

Hi,
Two methods for checking/repairing Indexing issues
1)RSRV for a particular cube
2)SAP_INFOCUBE_INDEXES_REPAIR report
You can also use this sql to rebuild an Index.
alter index <index name> rebuild online; Or you can rebuild Index by using ABAP report 'RSANAORA'.
Please check below thread it may help you.
/message/6483705#6483705 [original link is broken]
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=12942068&messageID=2052264
Thanks,
Sushil

ORA-01502 : index SYS.I_PROCEDURE1 is in unusable state

Oracle EE 9.2.0.8 on Windows 2003 SP2
Some SYS tables where moved by mistake with statement : "alter table sys.xxx move tablespace system;"
This caused some unusable SYS indexes but I cannot rebuild them. Each time I get same error :
ORA-01502: index 'SYS.I_PROCEDURE1' or partition of such index is in unusable state
Tracing showed me that some recursive SQL is going on and that fails because of the unusable index I_PROCEDURE1
This is the recursive sql who fails :
SQL> select audit$,options from procedure$ where obj#=115;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01502: index 'SYS.I_PROCEDURE1' or partition of such index is in unusable state
How do get out of this situation ?
Have already tried without succes :
- alter session set skip_unusable_indexes=true;
- altered some parameters to favor full table scans (optimizer_mode, db_file_multi_block_read_count
- tried to drop index (same error)
Thanks.
Benny Derous

Are you saying that you cannot rebuild that particular index, or other indexes? It works for me:orcl> alter index sys.i_procedure1 rebuild;
Index altered.
orcl> select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
CORE 11.2.0.3.0 Production
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
orcl>

In what way can an index go in invalid state????????

I did a lot of activity in my database and i found one of my index is in invalid state...i got an error
......Error occured is ORA-01502: index 'MUMBAI.SYS_C0013323' or partition of such index is in unusable state......
Can anybody tell me what activity (or set of activies) can lead to invalid state of Index????/
How to check if any other index is is Invalid state????????
Thanx in Advance
Gagan

Hello,
Following are some reason for index to be marked UNUSED;
Operations like Import Partition or conventional path SQL*Loader
that offer an option to bypass local index maintenance. When the
Import is complete, the affected local index partitions are marked
IU.
Partition maintenance operations like ALTER TABLE MOVE PARTITION
that change rowids. These operations mark the affected local index
partition and all global index partitions IU.
Partition maintenance operations like ALTER TABLE SPLIT PARTITION
that modify the partition definition of local indexes but do not
automatically rebuild the index data to match the new definitions.
These operations mark the affected local index partitions IU. ALTER
TABLE SPLIT PARTITION also marks all global index partitions IU
because it results in changes to rowids.
Index maintenance operations like ALTER INDEX SPLIT PARTITION that
modify the partitioning definition of the index but do not
automatically rebuild the affected partitions. These operations
mark the affected index partitions IU. However, if you split a
USABLE partition of a global index, resulting partitions are created
USABLE. If the partition that was split was marked IU, then so are
the partitions resulting from the split. Note that dropping a
partition of a global index that is either IU or is not empty causes
the next partition of the index to become IU.
Above points are mentioned at Metalink.
Hope that this will help you.....

Using UNUSABLE on Unique Index gives "initially in unusable state" error

I am doing the following:
1. Truncate table
2 Alter PK Index Disable
2. Alter Unique Index Unusable
3. Insert /*+ APPEND NOLOGGING*/ into my table
My problem is, I get an "ORA-26026: unique index ... initially in unusable state" error when I try to do the Insert. If I make the Unique index non-unique it isn't a problem. If I drop the index and recreate it its not a problem - so uniqueness doesn't appear to be the issue. Can you not use UNUSABLE with a Unique index, I couldn't find any reference to this in the 10g docs.
I am using 10.1.0.4.
Thanks
Richard

26026, 0000, "unique index %s.%s initially in unusable state"
//* Cause: A unique index is in IU state (a unique index cannot have
//* index maintenance skipped via SKIP_UNUSABLE_INDEXES).
//* Action: Either rebuild the index or index partition, or use
//* SKIP_INDEX_MAINTENANCE if the client is SQL*Loader.

Exchange Server 2013 Content Index is in "Unknown" state.

Hi Experts,
We have two Exchange Server 2013 CU3 installed in our customer premises 6 months back on top of Windows Server 2012 OS.
From last week, we are getting the content index status as "Unknown" while checking the "Get-Mailboxdatabasecopystatus".
We have tried to reseed the database by using "update-mailboxdatabasecopy -identity <db> -deleteexistingfiles then we came to know the server is not responding on port 3863.
Attached image is for your reference.
Need support from experts to resolve at the earliest.
Regards,
Santhosh
Santhosh Sivaraman MCITP: Microsoft Exchange Server 2007/2010 | MCSE/MCSA

Hi,
I had the same issue and was able to solved by recreate the search index component on the mailbox servers
Recreate the Search Foundation from scratch
Stop and disable the search services and rename the Data Folder "C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V15\Bin\Search\Ceres\HostController\Data"
Open power shell and navigate to C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V15\Bin\Search\Ceres\Installer
Run the command : .\installconfig.ps1 -action I -dataFolder "c:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V15\Bin\Search\Ceres\HostController\Data"
Output should be like
[PS] C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V15\Bin\Search\Ceres\Installer>.\installconfig.ps1 -action I -dataFolder "C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V15\Bin\Search\Ceres\HostController\Data"
Configuring Search Foundation for Exchange....
Successfully configured Search Foundation for Exchange
Rename the Index files for the database that are active on the node .
Start the Search Services
Removed a configuration entry that refers to the ContentSubmitters group. This entry is present in four XML files. Each file is called WcfConfigurator.
you can find each file in the following folder:
%ExchangeInstallPath%\Bin\Search\Ceres\HostController\Data\Nodes\Fsis\NODENAME\Configuration\Local
Here, “%ExchangeInstallPath%” is the Exchange installation root path, and the placeholder NODENAME represents one of the following names. (There is one name for each of the four files that are to be edited.)
AdminNode1
ContentEngineNode1
IndexNode1
InteractionEngineNode1
These are text files. You can use Notepad or any other convenient plain text editor to change them. Make sure that you make only the change that is described here.
Each file contains at most one line that contains the following: <AuthorizedRole>ContentSubmitters</AuthorizedRole>
Remove this line, and then save the file. Repeat this operation for each of the four files, and then restart the Microsoft Exchange Search Host Controller service.
Found the Index files in Crawling state as expected instead of Unknown.
Once all the Active copies are healthy and still the copies in failed and suspended state, then you can reseed the catalog files only using the below command
Update-MailboxDatabaseCopy -Identity BD\MBserver –CatalogOnly
Good Luck..
Regards,
Ayman Saleh

Saved tabs menu bookmark brings Safari window to unusable state

Saved tabs menu bookmark does not ask for user confirmation when navigating away from many tabs, and when the user returns to the previous set of tabs (note that this possibility isn't clear to the user), the entire Safari window reaches an unusable state.
I have a saved tabs folder as a bookmark item that is also present on the bookmarks menu bar. That means if I accidentally click on the saved tabs link instead of the address bar then my Safari session with all of the current active tabs disappears! I'd like to suggest that Safari presents a confirmation page when the user is about to change the state of more than one tab, just like it would ask for confirmation if the user were to exit Safari or close a window with many open tabs. By clicking on that single button nearby to the address bar, the entire window state is altered, not just the current tab. That's not my initial expected behaviour. On the other hand, it was also not clear to me initially that I could navigate back to the previous set of tabs when that state is comprehensively changed. So maybe the user can be informed about the ability to undo that action. For now, I will certainly be moving that set of tabs away from the menu bar, tucked further within the Bookmarks menu. But the problem that I have now is more than just a temporary unavailability of the old state.
When I accidentally navigated forward to that set of tabs, and subsequently quickly hit the back arrow button to revert to the previous state, Safari itself reached a point where the content of all tabs became unavailable. This sounds like it could be a kind of race condition where Safari needs to throw away cached information for the old set of tabs before it builds new cached information upon loading all new tabs. By aborting the process of loading those new tabs, maybe Safari assumes that the set of tabs is up to date, but the transition back to the old set of tabs doesn't appropriately trigger a reload and revert of the state. In any case the symptom is clear. When I switch between tabs in the problematic window, I continue to get completely blank screens even though I had many distinct tabs open in that window initially. It seems that to reproduce this problem what needs to be done is to have this set of saved tabs in a bookmark that is stored just below the address bar, and then to quickly navigate backward to return to the previous state. The more tabs in the current and stored session, the more this process may bog down Safari and expose this type of race condition. I also believe I may have also double or triple clicked that saved tabs button, which may invalidate the original set of tabs since the state for several sets of tabs might not be stored transparently by default. In any case I would like to recommend that Safari warn the user when this step takes place. The user could even be warned because they place a set of tabs bookmark below the menu bar, since they might accidentally click there. When this problem occurred, the other Safari window I had open had multiple tabs but this part of the Safari session was considered still working and the symptoms were not there. Yet the problematic window continues to experience the problem where all tabs are currently blank. I believe that I'll have to restart Safari to trigger the reloading of the pages, but I don't even know if that will be sufficient. I hope that this information is helpful.

xb37835dd237610f1 wrote:
In any case I would like to recommend that Safari warn the user when this step takes place.
Recommend to whom? Discussions is a user-to-user forum. You are just talking to other users. We don't write the applications so we can't change how they work.
If you have what you believe to be a product improvement idea, send it to Apple via the feedback URL. Posting it here is pointless.

Messages are in Scheduled State

Hi
some of my messages are in scheduled state. i verified SMQ1,SMQ2 . no queues are in block state. also i executed register queues in sxmb-adm still they are same state. how can i make them as successful state. only by restarting the messages or is there any other way? also tell me why these messages went to scheduled state

Reddy,
Can you please check this threads for possible solutions:
Problem with scheduled message in SXMB_MONI
SXMB_MONI - Message scheduled on outbound side (no queues)
Regards,
---Satish

Problems with Hints in abap code to use an index in a Select statement

Hi,
I want to use an especific index in a select statement but I can´t get it. I use de next statement:
SELECT ltaklgnum ltaktanum ltakvbeln ltaptapos ltapnltyp ltappvqui
       FROM ltak AS ltak INNER JOIN ltap AS ltap
                        ON ltaktanum = ltaptanum
                        AND ltaklgnum = ltaplgnum
       INTO TABLE l_t_tanum_silo
       WHERE ltap~lgnum EQ ip_lgnum
         AND ltap~pquit EQ ' '
         AND ltak~lgnum EQ ip_lgnum
         AND ltak~kquit EQ ' '
         AND ltak~queue EQ ip_queue
         %_HINTS DB2 ''.
We have DB2 for Linux Unix and Windows 9.5 as DB system.
How can I fix this?
Thanks a lot.
Regards

The DB2 for Linux Unix and Windows is coded DB6 for SAP and not DB2
Look at the following OSS notes
- [Note 129385 - Database hints in Open SQL|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/129385]
- [Note 150037 - Database hints in Open SQL for DB6 (DB2 for LUW)|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/150037]
- [Note 1270314 - DB6: DB2 9.5 Perf. degrad. for queries with INLIST clause|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1270314]
- [Note 868888 - DB6: Optimization Guidelines|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/868888]
You should use a
SELECT ltak~lgnum ltak~tanum ltak~vbeln ltap~tapos ltap~nltyp ltap~pvqui
FROM ltak AS ltak INNER JOIN ltap AS ltap
ON ltak~tanum = ltap~tanum
    AND ltak~lgnum = ltap~lgnum
INTO TABLE l_t_tanum_silo
WHERE ltap~lgnum EQ ip_lgnum
    AND ltap~pquit EQ ' '
    AND ltak~lgnum EQ ip_lgnum
    AND ltak~kquit EQ ' '
    AND ltak~queue EQ ip_queue
%_HINTS DB6 '<IXSCAN TABLE=''LTAP'' INDEX=''"LTAP~M"'' />'.
In note 868888 there is a sample for a join.
SELECT A~TABSPACE
FROM TADB6 AS A
JOIN IADB6 AS B ON A~TABART = B~TABART
%_HINTS DB6 '<NLJOIN><IXSCAN TABLE=''IADB6'' />'
        DB6 '<IXSCAN TABLE=''TADB6'' /></NLJOIN>'.
Regards

Business Area wise finacial statements - P&L, Balance Sheet

Hi,
My client has a requirement to have business area wise Trail Balance. In OBY6, business area financial statements tick has been done. So it is asking business area in cost objects. Plants are assigned to business areas. But still, I am able to post Balance sheet account to Balance sheet accounts without business area. I thought making business area mandatory for all G/Ls in OBC4. Then I have to write many substitutions and I may lose advantage of F.5D which gives business area basing on other P&L line item.
What needs to be done?
Can someone help me to suggest what exactly needs to be done to get Business Area wise Trail Balance.
We have not activated document splitting functionality. Please suggest the way without document splitting and New G/L functionalities.
Regards,
Saidarao
Edited by: saidarao G on Nov 22, 2011 7:47 AM

Hi,
You if want business area wise finanancial statements go to the this tranction code F.01
Regards
Mastan Reddy N

What indexes are created when we check dimension as line item.

What indexes are created when we check dimension as line item.
and also What indexes are created when we check dimension as high cardinality.
Where can i see that information in the system.
Answers are highly appreciated.
Regards
Kunal

Hi,
Line item means it does not have any dimension table.
High Cardinality means that the dimension is to have a large number of instances (that is, a high cardinality). Also, it is very important to indentify the line item dimension properly. E.g. Sales Order number, this will have the exact number of entries as the fact table entries. Hence, this can be created as a line item dimension. If you are not sure of high cardinality never select that. Activate this function when the dimension has is at least 10%- 20% the size of the fact table (in terms of the number of records). <b>In this case, B tree indices are created instead of bitmap indices.</b>. By default it is BITMAP but with high cardinality it is B-Tree indexing.
Hope this helps.
PB

Scheduled jobs are in released state only

Dear Experts,
we shedule jobs in background periodically. But for a particular time, all scheduled jobs are in released state only. Please suggest what might be the issue. Even some SAP std jobs have have not started.

Hi Raghavendra,
Have you checked enough BTC work process available in your SAP system.
Use SM65 transaction,goto =>Additional Tests ;check mark "Determine work process status" and "Determine no of jobs in queue"
and see the test results for any problems.
Best Regards,
Shyam Dontamsetty

Messages are in HOLD state

Hello ALL,
We have all messages processed sucessfully in Monitor but in "HOLD" state in the Audit log...EO is the QOS...Not sure why the messages are in HOLD state..There are atleast 15 receivers for this interface..ANy ideas guys..
-Teresa

Hi Teresa,
Which SP do you work with?
note: 813993
"<b>If a predecessor has the "canceled with errors"
status, further processing is not possible in systems
before Support Package 11</b> for the adapter framework
and Support Package 10 for the adapter framework core patch 02."
last time we talked you were on SP4 so
maybe you need OSS to handle this...
unless you've upgreaded
BTW
Are you sure it's not EOIO?
if it's EO then the predecessors thing doesn't make sense... wierd
>>>" Can't award points--Forum error"...
maybe they are changing our Martix...
Regards,
michal

Whether Function Based indexes are included in Oracle10 Standard edition?

Hi
Could you please tell me whether Function Based indexes are included in Oracle Standard edition 10.2.
Can you provide me the link to check the features available with 10.2 standard edition.
Thanks in advance...

Hi Madrid
Function Based Indexes is a feature from Enterprise Edition.Interesting... But why do you think so? I mean, if it is the case, the documentation should mention it...
IMO the reference is the guide about licensing. But if you know that somewhere else such an information is provided, please, give us a link.
Thank you,
Chris

Indexes are in unusable state

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for