Individual purchase order - Accounting entry  with account assignment M

I want to use the individual purchase order with account assignment M .
Can someone please tell me what would be the correct accounting entry during GR and during delivery?
Process is
Order -> pruchase req -> purchase order -> Goods receipt - > Delivery-> Billing
During order creation system asks for a consumption account against GBB-VKA
On GR the below entry is posted .
Dr GBB-VKA consumption
Cr WRX GR/IR .
Is this correct ??
If so what is the entry after delivery goods issue .

Hi Hitesh
I am now wondering if this is possible
When PO has acct assignment to CC or IO, GR hits consumption
With Wbse, it can hit to stock account. Am wondering whether it will hit stock account if the PO has acct assignment to sales order...
I have seen sap notes for this scenario and my memory says I have seen the GR hitting consumption in those notes. There was an issue in scn where price diff upon invoice in such a scenario was not hitting vprs. For that there was sap note.
Let us hear from others
Let me tag some stalwarts here. Waman Shirwaicar Szymon FIN Maslowski arturo senosain G Lakshmipathi
Br. Ajay M

Similar Messages

  • Account assignment for individual Purchase order

    Hi All,
    I am setting up the individual purchase order process , I want to use the account assignment M and dont want to use E.
    After setting it up when i posted the goods receipt i am getting the below entry.
    Dr  GBB- VKA    g/l
    Cr  WRX            g/l
    But i want the accounting entry as below
    Dr Stock account
    Cr GR/IR account
    I cannot setup the Stock account under GBB-VKA as its already used in BSX .
    Can someone please help me with this

    So you are saying i should assign a consumption account to GBB-VKA?
    Lets assume i do that . So when i do a GR the entry is
    Dr GBB-VKA consumption
    Cr WRX GR/IR .
    When I do a delivery on PGI the entry should be as below right .
    Cr Consumtion ( Same g/l as GBB-VKA)
    Dr COGS .
    To do this it will need a new movement type .
    But in standard schedule line CB the movement type is 601 . How will system pick this Consumption account ??

  • Individual purchase order with subcontracting material

    Hi all,
    I've implemented a individual purchase order in a sale order by means of 'TAB' category item. The material has been set as 'subcontracting'.
    When I create the sale order, a purchase requisition is automatically created with M imputation and special stock 'E'.
    Once I create, the purchase order with reference to purchase requisition, I set 'L' category item. Then I save the purchase order.
    In order to simplify the flowchart, the vendor has enough stock to manufacture the required material.
    Then, Tx. MIGO, stock input with reference to purchase order.
    For the FERT material --> movement 101 E + is set.
    For the component --> movement 121 E - is set.
    How can I obtain 121 'O' - movement for components in order to decrease SC vendor stock?
    Thank you very much in advance for your support.
    Best regards,
    Alberto Ramos.

    Dear Charlie,
    Thank you very much for your response. As you comment, I made a mistake with the number of movement. Certainly the movement for raw material consumption is 543.
    I have executed the flowchart you describe. In your case, an independent subcontracting purchase order is done. This flowchart works correctly (with the results you comment. Actually the raw consumption are related to mov. 543 O -).
    The problem is when purchse order is related to a sales order. That is:
    1. Sale order TA with only one position material A. Category item 'TAB'.
    2. Material master for material A --> MRP 2 view --> Special procurement field: 30 - Subcontracting
    3. An automatic purchase requisition is created (thanks to 'TAB' category item, schedule line, ...)
    4. Tx. ME21N --> I create a purchase order with reference purchase requisition:
        4.1. Account assignment category field is set to 'M' from sales order / purchse requisition
        4.2. I manually set Item category field to 'L' for indicating subcontracting (I don't force this to be 'L' from sales order / purchase requisition because I need to use the same flowchart for subcontracting and not subcontracting materials)
    5. Tx. MIGO
        5.1. For Fert material the system executes mov. 101 E +  (as in your description)
        5.2. For raw materials the system exectures mov. 543 E - ( instead of 543 O -). I would like to obtain the reduction of subcontracting stock, because this material is in my center but povided to SC manufacturer.
    Should I do a 'Subsequent adjustment' by means of Tx. MIGO the movement are:
      - FERT material 121 E - (depending on adjustment)
      - Raw materials 543 E - (again 'E' instead of 'O' which is the result I would like to obtain).
    I will very much appreciate your comments.
    Thank you again,

  • Not able to clear bank statement accounting entry with payment document.

    Hello FI guru,
    We are facing  problem to clear bank statement accounting entry with payment document  posted via t.code F110 (Automatic payment program).
    There is only single entry for payment in bank statment . But many entries in F110 for different vendors. Will posting the bank statement entry i.e Bank clear account Dr
                                        To Bank main account
    Its post with an error Error F5 263 the diference is too large.
    We are using muticash format & we have use 4 which clear Dr GL
    Request your help to resolve the problem Whether we missed any configuration or we have develop program for the same

    Hi,
    This error generally is due to tolerance error. Please check the assignment of the user id with the relevant tolerance groups. Let me know if it worked.
    or go through the following link
    F5 263 - The difference is too large for clearing
    BR,
    Satya

  • Purchase order using balance sheet accounts

    Hi there,
    We have a need to create purchase orders using balance sheet accounts instead of expense or cost of sales accounts.  Any pointers will be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks in advance

    Hi Raymond
      Not realy clear which scenario u r trying to address here. But you can post the Goods receipt to a balance sheet account. U can ideally create a separate valuation class and use the same for account determination. The materials for which you are making the PO have to be asigned to that particular valuation class. The rest of the configurations will remain as they are. But in the transaction key you will include the new valuation class and assign it to balance sheet account.

  • Process flow of excise duty from procurement to sales accounting entry with amount.

    Dear Expert ,
    Kindly any one help the process flow of excise duty calculation from procurement to sales accounting entry with amount.  for example.- if material amount is Rs. 10,0000 and excise duty is 8% , edu ecss 2 % , and sec ecss 1%. I want know the accounting entry on- MIGO, J1IEX, MIRO, F-43  AND , PGI, BILLING DOCUMENT, J1IJ , TR6 CHALLAN, J2IUN.
    Regards
    Akshaya

    Hi,
    In case of
    A. Procurement : there are two types of procurement viz. Local and Import
    LOCAL
    1. MIGO
    Inventory A/c Dr
    To GR?IR
    2. J1IEX
    CENVAT Receivable (Basic) A/c - Dr
    CENVATReceivable (Ecess) A/c - Dr
    CENVAT Receivable (S & H) A/c - Dr
    To CENVAT Clearing
    3. MIRO
    CENVAT Clearing A/c - Dr
    To Vendor A/chrough
    4. F-43
    No excise entry through SAP direct posting but through manual posting in case using TAXINN procedure.
    5. TR6 Challan
    PLA Payment  (Basic) A/c - Dr
    PLA Payment (Ecess) A/c - Dr
    PLA Payment (S & H) A/c - Dr
    To PLA on Hold A/c
    IMPORT
    1. MIRO
    ECS+SECS on Cus+CVD A/c Dr (consists of ECS on custm+cvd and S & H on custm+cvd)
    CVD Clearing A/c Dr (consists of Additional Duty CVD and CVD)
    Customs Clearing A/c Dr (consists of Basic Customs)
    To Customs Vendor
    2.  MIGO
    Inventory A/c - Dr
    To GR/IR A/c
    To Customs Clearing (consists of Basic Customs)
    To ECS+SECS on Cus+CVD (consists of ECS on custm+cvd and S & H on custm+cvd)
    3. J1IEX
    CENVAT Receivable (Basic) A/c - Dr
    CENVATReceivable (Ecess) A/c - Dr
    CENVAT Receivable (S & H) A/c - Dr
    To CVD Clearing
    4. F-43
    No excise entry through SAP direct posting but through manual posting in case using TAXINN procedure.
    5. TR6 Challan
    PLA Payment  (Basic) A/c - Dr
    PLA Payment (Ecess) A/c - Dr
    PLA Payment (S & H) A/c - Dr
    To PLA on Hold A/c
    Sales
    1. PGI
    COGS A/c Dr
    To Inventory
    2. Billing Document
    Excise
    ED Suspense A/c Dr
    To Liability for BED
    To Liability for ECS
    To Liability for S & H
    Customer
    Customer A/c Dr
    To ED Suspense A/c
    To Revenue
    To VAT / CST
    Hope your doubts are clear.
    Regards,
    Tejas

  • Account entries with excise & without excise for Subcontracting process.

    Please let me know the Account entries with excise & without excise for Subcontracting process.
    Regards
    PBR

    hi..
    check these links...
    Accounting entries for subcontracting
    and
    Subcontracting process with excise duty??
    It may help u..
    Thanks

  • Can someone tell me how to create accounting entries with the account status as error

    Hi,
    Can someone tell me how to create accounting entries with the
    account status as error?
    Thanks!!
    Danny

    It's call fixed/static background, and it is NOT directly support by iweb, you will need post processing either in html or javascript.
    Varkgirl (you need to search the previous forum) and I did it since iweb1:
    try Safari, and scroll: http://www.geocities.com/[email protected]/Links.html
    invisible link? roddy, fishing for info again?

  • Table for picking PURCHASE ORDER field corresponding to accounting document

    Dear All
    Table for picking PURCHASE ORDER field corresponding to accounting document.
    Thanks
    Rahul Jain

    Dear Jayram
    I know that Purchase order field can be picked from BSEG table but i am not able to capture the data into it. Whenever i book a invoice through FB60 or MIRO i give the reference PO number which is not getting updated in BSEG, BSAK and other relevant tables.
    Thanks
    Rahul Jain

  • "Individual Purchase order" with supersession

    have a scenario "Individual Purchase order" with supersession
    i face this problem
    When using the old transactions ME22n, we can replace the material with the
    new in supersession however; we cannot create an outbound delivery as
    it refers to the old material in ATP.
    We can re-run product selection in delivery, however SAP says the
    following:
    "For interchangeable parts to be considered in sales order processing
    for availability check there has to be the reason for substitution
    0009. The value for the field Outcome has to be B."
    "Note that copy routine 110 is only supported when you use outcome A
    and usage PSEL for deliveries"

    Is their any solution

  • Individual purchase order with Consignment

    Hi,
    advantage and disadvantage individual purchase order with Consignment.
    would you advise a individual PO with consignment?
    Thanks

    this 2 ar diffrent thing and have to used at diffrent place
    venfdor consignment  will be used when vendor is keeping his mateiral in our pant but its not our stock. when ever we use it then its ours stock
    ind PO is when ever u do gr all stock is ours and its valuated at our plant .
    so each one can me use as per the senerio.
    if there is vendor consignment senerio then u can use std PO functionaly and vise vers
    hope i have correctely understod ur ?
    reward if usefull

  • How to enable VSF cosumed with Individual purchase order(TAB)

    Hi, SAP guru.
    I want VSF consumed with individual purchase order (TAB).
    Could you give me the instrunction please?

    I explain here in detail.
    (In material master, srgategy group is '40'.)
    When you create a sales order with item category 'TAN', this sales order consume 'VSF'.
    and you change this item category to 'TAB', the consumption or allocation disappear.
    I want this TAB to be kept consumed with VSF.
    Could you give me the possibility and the instruction.
    For example;
    1. Intial
                                        Requirement
          Nov-1st    VSF      100
    2. When you create SO with TAN (10 pcs), SO consumes 10 of VSF.
                                        Requirement
          Nov-1st    VSF      90
          Nov-1st    SO        10
    3. And you change item caetgory to 'TAB',  VSF is back to 100.
                                        Requirement
          Nov-1st    VSF      100
    --- Cstock    SO (TAB)
          Nov-1st    PReq       10          
    What I did
          Requirement class '050' and 'KEB'    (OVZG)
                           VPZUO  is '1'  (I think sap standard)
        => It suppose that SO cousumes VSF, as VPZUO is same as ZUVKZ of PIR.
          Schedule line category 'CB'      (OVZ8)
                            Check 'Availability check for sales' (ATPPR) and  'Transfer of requirements' (BEDSD)
         =>  SO is displayed in MD04, but not consume VSF.
    3'. And you change item caetgory to 'TAB',  VSF is back to 100. SO doesn't consume it.
                                        Requirement
          Nov-1st    VSF      100
    --- Cstock    SO (TAB)
          Nov-1st   SO           10
          Nov-1st    PReq       10

  • Sales Order - Using Item Category 'TAB' - Individual Purchase Order

    All,
    I am configuring for the first time utilizing Sales Document Item category "TAB" - Individual Purchase Order.  I have a few questions:
    Is there a best practice configuration guide specific for this process?  I have found the 'third party' document/best practice, but nothing so far  on "individual purchase order from sales order'. 
    Is there a way to default Purchase Order Type "UB" stock transfer from the Purchase Requisition NB?  I thought this could be done based on the schedule line "CB" configuration, changing the 'item category' to 7 stock transfer, then this would carry into the mapping for purchase requisition type NB/item category stock transfer to purchase order type UB/item category stock transfer.  However, when I set '7' on the schedule line CB, I then receive a hard error when creating my purchase req to set the supplying plant.  I have more than one supplying plant, so I'm not sure if setting the '7' is the right setting for this process.  From what I've been able to find for documentation, the item category of the schedule line should be set to '0' standard.
    When I perform the post Goods Issue 601 of Special Stock "E" - to the customer (once the stock has been received into the right plant), the system is not creating an Accounting/FI Document to relieve the inventory and charge cost of goods sold.  I have reviewed automatic account assignment entries and these appear correct for 601 E.  Are there special settings for special stock "E" that I need to consider. 
    If you cannot answer all of these questions, but can answer one of them, I am most interested in teh last question above. 
    Regards,
    Sandra Miner

    Hi Reazuddin,
    What I don't understand is why:
    if I don't create PO --> I can create Outobund Delivery in Individual Purchase Order but if I create PO (not MIGO) I cannot create OBD in IPO.  (Note: in both cases I agree PGI is not possible)
    The flowchart is: Sale Order (IPO) --> Purchase Requisition --> Purchase Order (PO) --> MIGO (inbound delivery) --> MIRO (Vendor invoice verification) --> Outbound delivery ( delivery [OBD] + picking + posting[PGI]) --> Sales Invoice
    As per your comments:
    System will not stop you to create delivery, though you customize delivery item cat: as Check min qtty "0" - error message. because system checks for PGI qtty, but not the delivery qtty.
    But then in the case I create Sale order (IPO) + PO (without MIGO) --> the system should not stop me executing Outbound Delivery. It should stop me only if I execute Posting goods issue. But actually in this case, the system is stopping me at outbound delivery.
    I agree with Posting Goods Issue behaviour. It is logical in the following cases:
    Only Sale order (IPO) created --> PGI is not possible
    Sale Order (IPO) created + PO created --> PGI is not possible
    Sale Order (IPO) created + PO created + MIGO executed (inbound) --> PGI is possible.
    Thank you very much for your feedback.
    Regards,
    Alberto Ramos.

  • Standard individual purchase order -Delivery error

    Dear All,
    I'm having issue on individual purchase order, Using TAB item category.
    Please understand my issue:
    Without purchase order +MIGO + MIRO + I am creating outbound delivery number but PGI, but is not allowing.
    Here my question: without creating any special stock 0 quantity outbound delivery number is generating.
    The reason i understand that was standard behavior.
    My requirement, suppose created -- SO - with reference done outbound delivery --How to write logic.
    If item category TAB: special stock is exist, then system have to allow delivery quantity or else it has to show error message.
    Please provide me your valuable inputs to me,
    Thanks,
    Prasad.

    Hi Varaprasad,
                            You will have the special stock indicator "E" in the item category "TAB" Which tells the system that this item falls under special stock category. So at the time of delivery creation, you need to have stock againast the saleso order. So for that you need to have a PO created and MIGO done for that. Then only system will show the stock reserved for this sales order. There is one more way to create the delivery which is pOsting stock againast the sales oredr in "MB1C" by entering the special stock category "E" in the initial screen. When you do not have stock, if the system is allowing you to create delivery with zero quantities means that the configuration setting "Check 0 qunatity" in the delivery item category configuration(Transaction --0VLP-ZEROVLP) has been set to blank or "a", change this setting to "B" OR "C", But kindly please note that the Goods reciept mandatory and Invoice reciept mandatory indicator will come from the account assignment categoery of the Schedule line category configuration.(VOV6). Check "VOV6" and take the accoutn assignment category(Normally "M") and go to "OME9" and check if the goods reciept and Invocie reciept has ticked or not. If they are ticked, then you need to do the GR an IR. Kindly please let me know If you need any more information on this.
    Regards,
    Ram Pedarla

  • Inter Company Individual Purchase order!

    Hi All,
    I need you help on this .
    Please find the scenario below.
    Cusotme places order of Mat-A to Company A. The Company A creates PO to Company B. Company B delivers to Company A and then invoices Company A.  Company A recives the goods into own stocks. Now the Company A delivers to the customer from its own stocks and then invoices Customer.
    I decide to go ahead with the Individual Purchase order solution and since the Comapny A is buying from Comapny B, i decided to integrate the Cross Company STO flow in the procurement part. Hence the flow in SAP is like
    Cusotmer placese order to Company A
    Comapny A creates a Individual Purchase order type Sales order. So the Item category is TAB.
    This saler order generates a PR. I convet the PR into a CC_STO as in the case vendor is Plant B. Now the is STO appears in the delivery due list of plant B.
    Now I genreate the delivery to move stocks from plant B(of co.cd B) to Plant A(of co.cd A).
    Here is the problem. I am not able to do PGI as the system check for "sales order stock at plant B.
    "Sales order stock 36637 000010 does not exist". This should not be the case. A the stocks shoud get attached to the sales order only when recieved into Plant A.Hence system should not check for "sales order stock" at the plantB. Can anyone please help on this.
    Thanks is advance.

    Hi All,
    Thank you so much for your response. It was very helpful.
    @ Vivek, I am not able to do the PGI form Plant B to Plant A. Only then I will be able to do the GR at Plant A. Thank you!
    @ Ravi, Thank you ! The delivering plant is PlantA only. Nice point to check though.
    @Shiva Ram: Thanks a lot. I think I will remove the Spl stock indicator and go ahead. However the control of the stock once they are receipted into PlantA will be lost. The stock will be open and it can be delivered against any saled order though this stock was procured for a certain customer.
    However I am still wondering why the check for the Spl stock is done at the first delivery from Plant B to Plant A. The check for the spl stock should happen when the goods are delivered from Plant A to the cusotmer. This would be my ideal solution.
    Lets take a normal IPO scenario.
    CusotmerA places order of Mat-A to Company A. This sales order generates a PR. The Company A converts the PR into a std.PO to external vendor. The PO from the sales order will have a account assignment "M- Ind. cust. w/o KD-CO". The stocks will be received into Plant with spl indicator "E" while GR (MIGO). Now the system ensures that this stock can only be delivered against the particular sales order. Thus the stock procured for the customerA is delivered to customerA and not consumed by anybody else. In this case there is only one delivery involved, in SAP, which is 601 mvmt type from the Plant A.
    However if the vendor becomes another Plant (Plant B) belonging to another company code then there are two deliveries involved in the SAP system one with mvmt type 643, from Plant B to Pant A, and the second with 601 from Plant A to the customer. Hence the system should check if the stocks are attached with a spl indicator only during the second delivery of 601 mvmt type. I am facing a problem because the system does it for the first delivery itself. If any one of you know the answer please do let me know. I really appreciate it. Thanks a lot in advance.

Maybe you are looking for