Integration Process Referencing Message Interfaces In A Different SWCV

Hello Experts!
I am creating an Integration Process IP within SWCV A, using an Interface Mapping Object within SWCV A, Abstract Message Interface MI_A1 from SWCV B and Abstract Message Interface MI_A2 from SWCV B.
Because we have the dependencies set up in the SLD wherein SWCV A is a dependent SWCV of SWCV B, these basis objects can be referenced by the IP during the create process.
However, when I try to execute a "check" or activate the IP, I get the following error:
Expression must return the interface type MI_A1
Expression must return the interface type MI_A2
If I copy the MI objects into SWCV A, the IP is activated successfully.
The question is:
Why is it that while I'm creating the IP I am able to reference these basis objects, but the "check" or "activate" does not allow it? What is this error telling me?
Want more points? Appreciate any insight.

Thanks for pointing me to the right direction, Aamir.
It turned out that the problem was caused by one of the Message Interfaces used by the Interface Mapping. It had errors to where it was pointing to an inactive IDoc object. The bad MI caused the IM to be bad, that eventually caused the problem while creating the Integration Process.
Thanks again!
H.

Similar Messages

  • Integration Process of abstract interfaces of diff SWCV's

    Hey all,
    I am trying to create an integration process of a sender and receiver abstract interfaces of different SWCV’s. If I create the integration process in one of the SWCV, I am not able to select the other interface in the receive step.Is it a necessary criteria to have the both sender and receiver abstract interfaces to be in the same SWCV? Can they not be in different SWCV?
    -AR

    Hi Antonio,
    CLEAR SLD CACHE is not enough. After your SWCV update in SLD, you need to import again your SWVC inside IR.
    All your objects will be NOT deleted. Thus don't worry about your Data Type, Mappings, BPM, etc...
    I have already done such an import (after adding a usage-depency), I have never lose an object.
    If you are some doubt, you can Export all your namespaces in a file (cf. Tools > Export). Thus you will be able to Import all your namespaces if something will be wrong (but it will be not the case!). Ask to your admin to get this file in order to NOT send it to your production system...
    Regards
    Mickael
    Message was edited by: Mickael Huchet

  • CcBPM - How to use 1 Message Interface for 2 different Business System

    Hi,
    I have this bpm scenario below :
    JDBC QUERY (ASYN) ---> RFC (SYNC) -
    > JDBC INSERT (ASYN) -
    > MAIL (ASYN).
    So Both JDBC INSERT and MAIL using the same data input from RFC response for instance i will named as  MI_RFC_RES_ASYN_ABS. I have problem to configure in the integration directory, how make the xi smart enough to routing in the correct business system.
    JDBC -
    > BS_JDBC and MAIL -
    > BS_MAIL base on the send step in BPM because the interface is the same.
    Cheers
    Fernand

    Hi,
    If you want to send the same mesg to diff systems and also need to have the control on seq,
    then define 2 diff abstract interfaces for messages going out of BPM (with same message type so that structure is same).
    One will be used to define send step for JDBC and other for BPM.
    Define 2 send steps in BPM one for JDBC and other for mail using these abstract interfaces.
    Now you will have 2 receiver determinations.
    Since recr is determined based on sender system interface name and name space,
    system name ( BPM ) and name space will be same for both the messages going out of BPM.
    for JDBC abstract interface BS_JDBC will be recvr.
    and for Mail abstract interface BS_MAIL will be your receiver.
    hope it answers your qn.
    Regards
    Pushkar

  • Same Message interface in two different namespace

    Hi,
    can we have same MI in two different namespaces(Sofwate componnent also different)?
    Thanks
    Ruban

    The design objects is uniquely identified by combination of Object Name, Namespace, and SWC.
    So in your case, it is not a problem.
    Liang

  • Adding Message Interfaces to Business System

    Hi All,
    Can anyone tell me how and why we dont add message interfaces to a business system??..
    The business system corresponds to Tech system which has software component...right?...
    so how do we get interfaces from diff components into the same business system?

    Hi Ravindra,
        The logical relation ship between Business Systems Technical Systems, Product and software components is as follows.
    1) Each business system will be associated with a technical System.
    2) Each SWCV will be a part of a Product.
    3) A Product is Installed on a Technical system.
    4) Multiple Products can be installed on a technical system.
    5) So, multiple SWCVs can be installed in a technical system.
    6) hence a Business system can have Message interfaces belonging to different SWCVs.
    Regards,
    ravi

  • BPM : Message interface is not used by this process

    Hi,
    In BPM : to pass the message facing error as below.
    Messages not reflecting in BPM monitor.
    I have configured Recveiver - transformation - sender in BPM.
    In recvier in BPM is configured with Abstract Type as same in the message mapping.
    Is there any thing i am missing?
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!--  Call Adapter
      -->
    - <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
      <SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="BPE_ADAPTER">MESSAGE_NOT_USED</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1 />
      <SAP:P2 />
      <SAP:P3 />
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
      <SAP:Stack>Message interface is not used by this process</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error>
    I have refered links but not able to get the clue for this error as its from the Call adapter.
    error: Message interface is not used by this process Netweaver PI 7.0
    BPE_ADAPTER: MESSAGE_NOT_USED
    Regards,

    Hi,
    I just saw your IP design and from this I can see that you have message mapping between Sender(as in Outbound interface MIOASY) and abstract interface (as in MIAASY) and then in that you have used transformation step to utilise Interface mapping which is between same abstract interface which is not required at all as message type for both the interfaces is same. For me, what your configuration would be is
    1. Sender agreement to fetch the message from outbound interface(MIOASY) utilising communication channel with whatever adapter you have used
    2. Receiver Determination with Sender and sender interface as MIOASY while receiver as IP(Integration process)
    3. Interface determination between
        a. Sender and Outbound interface and Abstract interface with interface mapping IM_Sender
        b. IP as sender with abstract interface MIAASY and receiver interface MIIASY with no interface mapping being used as it must be of same type as receiver interface is
    4. Receiver agreement with MIIASY being used as receiver interface and communication channel utlililsed to convert it into receiver format.
    If I am assuming it correct then if you see then inside BPM we are not using receiver interface MIIASY which is why I feel this error is coming.
    However, if you design it something like this then I feel the error would get resolved
    Design
    1. Make one abstract interface (MIAASY_Sen) of same type as sender, and create another abstract interface (MIAASY_Rec) of same type as your receiver message type
    2. Create message mapping between sender message type and receiver message type, Interface mapping IM_ABS - (MM_ABS_ABS) between sender abstract interface (MIAASY_Sen)  and receiver abstract interface (MIAASY_Rec)
    3. BPM should be something like this
       Container:*
    rec Abstract Interface MIAASY_Sen
    send Abstract Interface MIAASY_Rec
    Receiver (rec) - Transformation (IM_ABS) -  sender (send)
    Configuration
    1. Sender agreement to fetch the message from outbound interface(MIOASY) utilising communication channel with whatever adapter you have used
    2. Receiver Determination with Sender and sender interface as MIOASY while receiver as IP(Integration process)
    3. Interface determination between
        a. Sender,Outbound interface MIOASY and Abstract interface MIAASY_Sen with no interface mapping
       b. IP as sender with abstract interface MIAASY_Rec and receiver interface MIIASY with no interface mapping being used as it is of same type as receiver interface is
    4. Receiver agreement with MIIASY being used as receiver interface and communication channel utlililsed to convert it into receiver format.
    Let me know if it works.
    Regards,
    Amit

  • Idoc to flat file using Integration process does not show up at all

    Hello All,
    I created a scenario IDOC to Flat File using Integration Process and one without IntegrationProcess. I am able to execute the one without Integration Process easily.
    However when I send the IDOC from SAP then the Integration Process scenario just does not work.
    I Checked SXMB_MONI  There is no entry for the Integration Process.I can see entry for other without Integration Process.
    SXI_CACHE : I can see my Integration Process active
    SWEQADM :  I have activated the Event Queue and Background job
    SWF_XI_ADM_BPE :  ALL BPE is showing green status.
    All syntax check on IP are fine.
    There is no Basis Help for me so  there could be some additional basis steps which need to be configured.  Has anyone faced such an issue with Integration Process?
    Regards
    Prashanta

    Hope this might help you. when u configure an IDoc as Sender with BPM this is how you proceed.
    <b>1<b>. let us split the scenario into two</b>.</b>
    a. <b>Sender to BPM</b> ( Integration Process).
    b. <b>BPM to Receiver</b>.
    <b>2. First let us configure the first Sender to BPM.</b>
    a. Sender Agreement( <b>Not required</b> ).
    b. Receiver Agreement( <b>NOT Required</b>).
    c. Receiver Determination( Sender Service, Outbound Interface, Receiver Service(<b>Integration Process</b>).
    d. Interface Determination( Inbound Interface(Sender Abstract Interface), Message Mapping(NOT Required if your using transformation stepin Integration Process)).
    <b>3. Now let us configure the Second BPM to Receiver.</b>
    a. Sender Agreement( <b>NOT Required</b>)
    b. Receiver Agreement( Sender Service(<b>Integration process</b>), Receiver Abstarct Interface,Receiver service, Inbound Interface).
    c. Receiver Determination( Sender Service(Integration Process), Receiver Abstarct Interface,Receiver Service).
    d. Interface Determination( Inbound Interface, Message Mapping(<b>NOT Required</b>)).
    So Finally we have <b>One Receiver Agreement</b>, <b>Two Receiver Determinations</b>, <b>Two Interface Determinations</b>.
    Please let me know if you have any more queries.
    Regards
    Gopi

  • Difference between Workflow and Integration Process

    Hi Experts,
    Can someone please explain, what is the difference between the workflow and integration process(BPM).
    Thanks
    Sree

    Hi Sree,
    Integration Processes are :-
    --Message based
    --Interface focused
    --Cross component
    --Have no support for human interaction
    --Enabled with SAP XI
    Workflows are:-
    --Object based
    --Human focused
    --Intra-application
    --Have no support for mapping, routing or message transformations
    --Enabled with the SAP Web AS
    However, most automated business processes involve a combination of the two.
    I hope this clear your doubt.
    Regards.
    Praveen

  • Message interface

    Hi all,
             In IDOC interface,
    sender is IDOC imported from R3
    Rec is same IDOC structure with my name space but i it is not created in IR.
    Interface mapping is done it is aying outbound it is saying name of IDOC(Order,order04) and at inbound side it is saying(Input message)...
    and interface working successfully from two years
    i try to click on the inbound interface with my namespace name it is saying unable to read this object..
    i try to understand this interface but i am missing some where
    ( one more thing actually this interface dont need any mapping but they created interface mapping)
    thanks
    Kumar....

    Hi Krishna,
    When ever u r doing the scenario with the IDoc either in the sender or in the receiver side there is no need to create the Inbound.Outbound Message Interface in the IR. U can directly import the IDoc to the XI and give the IDoc name directly to the inbound/outbound Interface.
    >>target is with the name space of interface but no interface is created in IR..
    Check if the Message Interface belongs to the same name space or to the some Generic Message Interface in the different namespace.
    Regards
    Santhosh
    Remember to set the thread to solved when you have received a solution

  • SRM7.0-No standard Integration Scenarios & Integration Processes & Msg Map

    Hi,
    In Integration Repository of PI, for s/w component SRM 7.0, there is no standard 'Integration Scenarios & Integration Processes' & standard 'Message Mapping' in any of the namespaces. But in SRM 5.0, it 'Integration Scenarios & Integration Processes' are there like...
    Plan_Driven_Procurement_SupplierEnablement &
    Service_Procurement_SupplierEnablement
    Pls help.
    Thanks in advance,
    rgds,
    balu

    Hi
    Please check the proxy services under the name space "http://sap.com/xi/SRM/SE/Global" . SAP note 1263876 may help you in finding the right service for your scenario.
    Thanks
    Kiran

  • Error: Message interface is not used by this process Netweaver PI 7.0

    Hi All,
    I am receiving this error in file to idoc scenario. The file is being picked up by communication channel. Then through an interface mapping IM_MET_ROUTE is being forwarded to a BPM MET_FILE_ROUTE. The MET_FILE_ROUTE forwards it to different BPM depending on file type. whenever I am posting a file it is not reaching IM_MET_ROUTE and giving an error  as shown below.
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!--
    Call Adapter
      -->
    - <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
      <SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="BPE_ADAPTER">MESSAGE_NOT_USED</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1 />
      <SAP:P2 />
      <SAP:P3 />
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
      <SAP:Stack>Message interface is not used by this process</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error>
    Can you please suggest any solution to remove the error.

    Hi All,
    Thanks a lot Vikrant for your suggestion. The error is resolved. This was not a configuration problem. This was a design problem. Initially I also looked for configuration changes but that was correct hence I came to conclusion that this might be a design isuue.
       These are the steps that we should follow to resolve the errors
    1. First Check your configuration again and again with test tool and payload to find where exactly your configuration is failing.
    2. The above step will not be successful since we are already receiving the error.
    3. The above test will fail in interface determination step.
    4. Please go through the interface determination in Integration repository(PI 7.0).
    5. Check whether all interface mapping,source and target message interface are proper or not.
    6. if receiver or sender of message is an BPM please look into their receiver and sender element message type.This must match with the one specified in Interface mapping defined within Integration directory( in the interface deterination step).
       In my case the sixth step above was the solution.

  • Line Split Interface to feed Integration Process - Performance Issues

    Hi All
    We have a scenario whereby we receive an XML message from a 3rd Party through an exposed SOAP Adapter service. The XML Message has multiple lines that need to be split up and processed as individual messages. We need to create a Line Splitting interface in order to achieve this. The Line Split interface would feed different Integration Processes depending on a specific payload value. The Integration Processes would then perform certain specific logic & Rules as well as transformations to specific message formats (e.g. idoc, xml, flatfile). The Line Split interface also maps from an xml structure that caters for multiple lines, to a flatened xml structure which only contains one line. The uper range of a message we may need to split into individual messages is 30 000 lines.
    We first used an Interface Map and used SplitByValue to achieve this, however we ran into the constraint that we could not feed the output split messages to an Integration Process - you can only feed it to Adapters that reside on the J2EE engine.
    We then decided to build a seprate Integration Process thats sole purpose was to split the message and route the indvidual messages to other integration processes to perform the logic, business rules and specific transformations. However, the performance of the ccBPM line splitting Integration Process was nowhere near the Interface Map.
    e.g. Interface Map Split 1000 Lines = 13 seconds - BPM Integration Process 1000Lines = 100 seconds.
    Does anybody have any suggestions on how we can perform the line split outside of BPM, or how we can improve ther performance of the line splitting within BPM?
    Thanks for your assistance.
    Edited by: CostaC on Aug 24, 2009 11:53 AM

    hi,
    >>>We first used an Interface Map and used SplitByValue to achieve this, however we ran into the constraint that we could not feed the output split messages to an Integration Process - you can only feed it to Adapters that reside on the J2EE engine.
    the easiest (not the only) way :
    do the split as you did here and post the results in different folders (file adapter)
    then set up scenarios that will get the files from those folders
    (many additional objects but will be much much faster and better then a BPM)
    you could also split the messages in the adapter module but this is more advanced
    and officially SAP does not recommend it - even though it's possible
    Regards,
    Michal Krawczyk

  • Handling fault messages in an Integration Process (bpm)

    I have a bpm in PI 7.11 which performs a synch call to an external webservice. In addition to the request/response, that webservice can also generate two faults: ObjectNotFoundFault and generalfault.  I am having trouble handling these faults - when a fault occurs my handler is not being invoked and thus the bpm process stops/errors. When I look at the underlying process (via txn swi1), I see the exact error text:
    "No exception defined for fault message ObjectNotFoundFault http://www.companyb.com/services/olsa_v1_0/"
    From what I understand within the bpm synch call step to the webservice I need to do the following to handle the exception/fault:
    - put the synch call (to the webservice) into a block
    - add an exception branch to that block named let's say A & set the exception handler of that block to be A
    - in the exception setting of that synch step, select A
    In my case, I don't care about the fault details other than to ensure it does not stop the whole Integration Process, so in my exception branch I don't do anything. I did try adding a control step within it too (as per SAP Press text book).
    Is there anything else I need to do here?  I am not mapping the returned fault - does the fault need to be mapped (not sure how I would do this given that the synch step uses an abstract interface and therefore to my knowledge no fault mapping can be done)? 
    There are 2 Notes that describe my issue exactly:
    https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1484903
    https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1158699 <-- this one refers more to me, but we already have in 7.11
    Can anyone let me know exactly the steps I would perform to handle these faults - does the exception name / handler A above need to be named the actual exception / fault ObjectNotFoundFault?
    Any help appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Keith)?
    Any help appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Keith

    Thanks - my scenario I guess is #2 of that blog. But is your take that even if I don't care what is in the fault message, i.e. I don't care about the contents of it but rather I just want to continue on from it, that I still need to perform this java coding?  It's not clear to me from what he says - it seems to me he does the java coding to actually capture the contents of the message.  I am in fact using the soap axis adapter too, as he is. The screen shot showing the exception branch is basically what I have.
    Regards,
    Keith

  • Missing sender information in message from Integration Process

    Hi All,
    I am testing a scenario uses Integration Process. This Integration process sends out a async message but this message has empty sender tag in header , Because of this routing rules and agreements defined for this are not triggered and message goes into error state.
    There is sender interface Information in message header but not integration process information. I am working on SAP NetWeaver PI 7.1 system. This is working from other synchronous interface in same process.
    Routing rule and receiver agreement has sender as mandatory field, so can not define generic set without sender component.
    I went through SAP Note 807640 But there is no information about such error.
    Am I missing something in configuration? Please let me know how can i configure Routing Rule and Interface Determination for this scenario.

    Thanks for replying to the post.
    Integration process is used as a async-sync bridge. Following are high level steps.
    1. Receive async FI message from sender
    2. Map message to BAPI SAP FI document
    3. call Sync BAPI.
    4. Map the response of BAPI.
    5. Post it back to sender in async mode.
    I am having problem in step 5 where message is coming out of BPE without its own name (i.e sender name). Thus it does not triggers Routing rules and fails.

  • Spliting a Message to reuse an Integration Process made for a single one.

    Hi,
    I have a Integration Process that works well for a XML message of the type:
    <EMESSAGE>
      <PERSON>
        <TAG_1>
        <TAG_2>
      </PERSON>
    </EMESSAGE>
    My BPM process the data for the Person correctly.
    Now I want to be able to tried more than one person per input message, some thing like:
    <EMESSAGE>
      <PERSON>
        <TAG_1>
        <TAG_2>
      </PERSON>
      <PERSON>
        <TAG_1>
        <TAG_2>
      </PERSON>
      <PERSON>
        <TAG_1>
        <TAG_2>
      </PERSON>
    </EMESSAGE>
    I build a 1:n Interface Mapping that creates me the following structure:
    <Messages>
    <Message1>
    <EMESSAGE>
      <PERSON>
        <TAG_1>
        <TAG_2>
      </PERSON>
    </EMESSAGE>
    </Message1>
    <Message2>
    <EMESSAGE>
      <PERSON>
        <TAG_1>
        <TAG_2>
      </PERSON>
    </EMESSAGE>
    </Message2>
    <Message3>
    <EMESSAGE>
      <PERSON>
        <TAG_1>
        <TAG_2>
      </PERSON>
    </EMESSAGE>
    </Message3>
    </Messages>
    But when I use a ForEach Block in my new BPM, it doesn't work if there is more then 1 person in the input. The error message I got is:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
    - <MappingTrace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Namespace:http://domain.com/xi/domain_4</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Name:IM_CPM_AbsSync_to_N_CPM_AbsSync</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-SWCV:3E235261F43111DDB40AC952C0A80C15</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Step:1</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Type:XSLT</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Program:CPM_to_N_ContextPersonMessage</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Mapping has one input message.</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Dynamic Configuration Is Empty</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Multi mapping required.</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Creating XSLT mapping CPM_to_N_ContextPersonMessage.</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Load 3e235261-f431-11dd-b40a-c952c0a80c15, http://domain.com/xi/domain_4, -1, CPM_to_N_ContextPersonMessage.xsl.</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Search CPM_to_N_ContextPersonMessage.xsl (http://domain.com/xi/domain_4, -1) in swcv 3e235261-f431-11dd-b40a-c952c0a80c15.</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">Call XSLT processor with stylsheet CPM_to_N_ContextPersonMessage.xsl.</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">Returned form XSLT processor.</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">XSLT transformation: CPM_to_N_ContextPersonMessage.xsl completed with 0 warning(s).</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Dynamic Configuration Is Empty</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Content Type application/xml</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">No interface specified for parameter 2</Trace>
      </MappingTrace>
    Does someone have any idea or a suggestion on how to reuse my BPM that works for a single person?
    Thanks in advance for your suggestions.
    greg

    ok no success for the moment, so I will try to describe my BPM more precisely:
    The DT I use can contain up to 1'000 PERSON record inside a unique EMESAGE reccord (the root element)
    My containers: (all are of type Abstract Interface of my DT)
    Input (Process)
    requestList(Process) Multiline
    request(block)
    response(block)
    Receive Request Step
    Message: input
    Start Process: Yes
    Mode : Async.
    Split (Transformation) Step
    IM: My Interface that does the 1Message with N PERSON records to N Messsages with 1 PERSON record
    Create new transaction: Yes
    Source: input
    Target: requestList
    Block Step
    Mode: ForEach
    Block Start: New transaction
    Block End: New transaction
    Multiline_Element: RequestList
    CurrentLine: request
    No end condition
    Inside the block
    My Sync Send call to a BAPI
    Source: request
    Target: response
    A final Async Send step
    Message: response.
    The workflow stop at the Transform step, as if hte fact that many messages come in result could not be handled back. Here are the details for the Interface mapping used in the transformation step:
    Source: MyDataTypeAbstractAsynchroneInterface
    Occurrence: 1
    Destination:
    Occurrences: 0:unbounded
    Mapping program: the following XSLT:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <xsl:stylesheet version="2.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
         <xsl:output method="xml" version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" indent="yes"/>
         <xsl:template match="EPERSON">
         <ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
                   <xsl:for-each select="CONTEXTPERSON">
                   <xsl:element name="ns0:Message{position()}">
                   <EPERSON xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="ContextPersonMessage">
                        <xsl:element name="CONTEXTPERSON">
                             <xsl:attribute name="personid"><xsl:value-of select="@personid"/></xsl:attribute>
                        </xsl:element>
                        <!--End of CONTEXTPERSON> -->
                   </EPERSON>
                   </xsl:element>
              </xsl:for-each>
         </ns0:Messages>
         </xsl:template>
    </xsl:stylesheet>
    Still any suggestions ?
    The trace of the error is the same as before, so I won't copy paste it again.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Blank white screen when minimized or closed

    Lately, whenever I have iTunes minimized or closed, I now have a blank white screen the same size as the iTunes window. I can move this "window" but it covers other items. When I show the iTunes window again, it appears exactly where this white windo

  • Why is build preview so fast?

    Hi - something's happened to Keynote with its Build previews. When I build an animation (using a simple effect like Appear) with several items appearing in order, the preview just races by. I have to actually hit Play and walk thru my sequence to mak

  • How do I stay logged into my service provider home page.

    I have an ATT Account and use the classic home page with the Firefox Browser. I want to stay logged in for at least 2 weeks or more, but each time I enter the Firefox browser, it requires me to re-insert my full ID and Password. How do I change this

  • Dispatcher stops Frequently: Please help

    Hi Experts, im  facing issues related to Dispatcher , it stops frequently. as i have restarted the system many times but again same .. PLEASE HELP Environment . :   ECC6.0,  ORACLE,  WINDOWS  32 bit Thanks in Advance  and Appreciate the responses....

  • Ignore PPM Mode Linkage in Planning Board

    Hello experts, I have a a burning question here.. I'm working in a project whose using PPDS PPM with more than one activities, and multiple modes (for alternative resources). In the Activity Relationship, we define Mode Linkage as '3', so whenever we