Inter Project Billing - Questions

Hi,
We have setup Inter Project billing and the process works as expected.
But we still have questions about the Accounting Process - do the ap invoice and the ar invoice hit the same account? and how do we clear the Open Invoices on both AP and AR?
Please Help!!!!
Thanks,
Akshaj

Hi Dina,
A couple more questions.
Following is a table with example transactions below:
GL     Cust. Proj     Internal Proj.     Consolidated
Sales           400          
IP-Sales               (200)     (200)
COS               200     200
IP-COS          200          200
Clearing     (200)               (200)
Net Income          200      0     
1.     Should the UBR / UER be an internal UBR/UER. Would it not otherwise murky up the UBR/UER for contract projects?
2.     How do the Internal Project and the Customer Project rollup on the GL ? Do we need to have a consolidation project to net IP-Sales and IP-COS
3.     Also - how do we handle scenarios where COS in the internal project is greater than the revenue/billed amount? How does this rollup to the Customer Project?
Please advise.
Thanks.

Similar Messages

  • Projects Cross-charge functionality Vs Inter-project Billing

    Hi,
    We are currently evaluating the funtionalities of Project Cross Charge Vs Inter-project billing. Our setup is such that we have 3 Legal Entities, 3 Business groups, 3 SOB's and 3 operating units, each tied to their own legal entity, Business group and Set of Bools. When reviewing the documentation, it looks like the Cross charge functionality does not support operating units that are in two different business groups. Does that imply that we have use the Inter-project billing to charge projects across operating units.
    We will really appeciate, if one can provide some additional insight in this regard.
    Regards,
    - Vasu Krishnaswamy -

    Hi,
    It is possible to have cross charge across the Business groups. It is also mentioned in Oracle Projects fundamentals guide. Please refer to the Global Project Support Chapter. Below is the extract from it.
    Providing Data Access Across Business Groups
    Global enterprises have resources and projects that are located, managed, and accounted
    for in different business groups or different countries. To meet the needs of these
    enterprises, Oracle Projects provides the following functionality:
    • Globally located resources can charge their time and expenses to projects that are
    owned outside their respective business groups.
    • Resources can manage and administer projects located in different business groups.
    • Oracle Projects produces appropriate accounting entries, intercompany invoices, and
    management reports even if the resource organization and project owning
    organization have different accounting calendars and job definitions.
    This functionality is provided through the use of global organization hierarchies, global
    jobs, and cross charge functionality.
    Hope this helps!
    Thanks,
    Sathish
    www.projectsaccounting.com

  • Project Billing Question

    Hi All,
    I have couple of Project billing questions. Hope you can help
    1)A wrong customer was attached to project billing agreement, funding and base line also completed for the customer.
    Now we realized that its wrong customer and want to change it to correct customer.
    What are the options we have here?
    Can we delete or end date the billing agreement?
    will the funding be release from the wrong customner after deleting or end dating the billing agreement?
    2) Wrong customer attached to a project..agreements,funding,baselining are NOT done.
    How can we delete this customer and add the correct customer?
    The option to change the customer is grayed out.
    Appreciate if you can help.
    Thanks

    Hi
    On your first question you said the agreement was created for wrong customer. Since you already baselined the funding, I assume you have that customer linked to the project.
    You can go the Agreement form and  enter a negative funding line allocated to the same project. The total allocated amount will be zero. The agreement is now not allocated and free to be allocated to another project. If it is a wrong agreement you may update the agreement amount to zero.  Now create a new agreement for the right customer.
    The open issue is with the project. You have a wrong customer associated with that project. However, system will not allow you to remove the customer - project record.  Solution depends on the way the project was setup. Did you enable customer at top task? if so, end date the top task and create an alternative top task with the right customer.
    If the project has been set with a single customer you better close the project and start a new one.
    However, if you need an alternative solution, I can suggest a custom method. Go to Help > ..> Examine and change the existing customer of the project to zero contribution.
    Now you will be able to add the right customer to the project and have 100% contribution on it.
    Dina

  • Need the exact difference betwn Intercompany Billing and Inter-project bill

    Hi,
    Can any one tell me the exact difference between the intercompany Billing and inter-project billing?
    The decision to which should be used in which scenraios.
    also what is the Setup Level Difference in both.
    If you have any white paper / document / note in metalink also on this topic then I will be very happy to have that.
    Thanks very much in advance.
    Regards

    Hi
    Inter project billing may be used within the same operating unit.
    Intercompany billing may be used only accross operating units.
    Inter project billing means the provider organization is charging a separate provider project.
    With intercompany billing provider organization is charging the same project as of the receiver organization.
    With inter project billing the provider project may bill the receiver in any billing method as any contract project. With intercompany billing the billing is based on transfer price rules which may be only applied to actual expenditures of the provider organization.
    There is full list of all setup steps in Oracle Projects Implementation user guide.
    Dina

  • Inter company billing relevancy - Question

    We have one order type (A) which we want to make it not relevant for inter company billing. The order type used to use the same delivery and intercompany billing type (ZIA) other order types (B, C...) which are relevant for inter company billing.
    We have removed the inter company billing type from the order type (A) definition. And we have added a requirement in copy control to stop the inter company billing from this order type (A).
    Now the inter company billing doc is not created any more due to the copy control requirement. But when I run billing due list, it still shows that the delivery for this order type(A) is relevant/due for inter company billing.
    I guess the reason is that since order type A shares that same delivery and billing doc type with other order types, the copy control from the delivery and billing (inter company) still shows the flow from the delivery to the inter company billing type is valid, thus still trying to create the inter company billing. (Since I cannot remove the copy control from the delivery type to the inter company type)
    So my questions are: Did I missing anything else to exclude this order type from inter company billing? Do I have to use a different set of delivery type to make the deliveru due list NOT to show that the deliveries for order type A are due for inter company billing?
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    I think that the next notes suggest a solution:
    Note 209934 - Reason f rejection ineffect w intercompany billing
    Note 308989 - Consultant note for cross-company transactions (and related notes)
    Note 338922 - Analysis note for cross-company transactions (delivery)
    Note 502877 - Delivery without reference relevant for intercompany billing
    Note 301254 - Creation of billing index
    Note 386370 - Check report for the billing due list (billing index)
    I hope this helps you,
    Regards,
    Eduardo

  • Project Billing "write-off" options

    I'm attempting to determine the best method of "writing off" transactions on direct projects that have been reported as billable, accrued revenue but will never be billed. Please consider the following narrative as an example:
    A consultant (consultant x) charges April time and expense to project 10001 in a billable capacity (charged transactions to a billable task). The transactions are cost distributed, revenue distributed and an invoice is subsequently produced. All cost and revenue transactions are produced, interfaced and ultimately posted to the general ledger in April. The month of April is closed in PA and the invoices for the April billing cycle are produced. Project 10001's draft invoice includes those charges reported by consultant x and is distributed to the project manager for approval. The project manager reviews the invoice review and determines that consultant x's transactions will never be billed and instructs the accounting group to write off the transactions.
    Challenge: we need a way to "write-off" (reduce revenue and change billing status) transactions that will allow for consistent reporting and measurement. Specifically, we need to be able to determine all write-off's (revenue/billing reductions) in a given period that relate to original transactions from an earlier or different period. In short, we want to establish a policy and procedure for consistently processing and reporting these types of conditions.
    Proposed Options:
    1) use the "special" non-billable adjustment option from either expenditure inquiry or invoice review to change the billing status from billable to non-billable.
    Pros:
    a) transactions will remain on the project in the capacity they were reported by the employee
    b) an adjustment record will be created in the PA_Expend_Item_adj_Activities table which will include the adjustment activity code (i.e. Billable Reclass, Non-billable reclass, billing hold, billing hold release, etc.)
    c) history of who created original transactions and adjustments is available (full audit trail)
    d) a reversing revenue entry will be created in the PA_Cust_Rev_Dist_Lines_all table which will allow us to track the dates (gl period) of the revenue adjustment and compare it to the original transaction dates.
    Cons:
    a) to the average users the transaction on a billable task flagged as non-billable with no corresponding revenue may look unusual because there is no description explaining why the adjustment existed. the only way to determine that revenue existed and was subsequently reversed is to look at item details- revenue details.
    b)The revenue write-off will be charged to the same accounts (revenue and inventory) that the original transaction was booked to but in reverse. we don't have the ability to deflect the "write-off" to a bad debt account versus a direct write-off of revenue.
    c) The employee's utilization calculations will be impacted by changing the billing status of the transactions and reducing the corresponding revenue. we may need to update the utilization report to reflect these types of transactions differently.
    2) use the "special" transfer adjustment option to transfer the transaction from the originating billable task to a non-billable destination task on the project in question.
    Pros:
    a) the average user will easily see that the transaction in question has been reversed and b) the revenue subsequently written off by the negative revenue on the reversal transaction
    c) an adjustment record will be created in the PA_Expend_Item_adj_activities table which will include the applicable adjustment activity code(s) (Transfer Back-out, Transfer Originating, Transfer Destination).
    d) history of who created original and adjustments is available.
    a reversing revenue entry will be made via e) the negative reversal entry created in the PA_Cust_Rev_Dist_Lines_All table.
    Cons:
    a) the original transaction is being altered (transferred) by accounting. the integrity of the transaction as it was submitted by the source employee may be compromised.
    b) there is no easy way for the average end user to know where the transaction was transferred to. the information is available via ad hoc reporting from database tables but looking at expenditure inquiry for a given project you will not be able to determine where the transaction went if it was transferred to another task and many tasks exist or if it was transferred to another project entirely.
    c) The revenue write-off will be charged to the same accounts (revenue and inventory) that the original transaction was booked to but in reverse. we don't have the ability to deflect the "write-off" to a bad debt account versus a direct write-off of revenue.
    d) The employee's utilization calculations will be impacted by changing the billing status of the transactions and reducing the corresponding revenue. we may need to update the utilization report to reflect these types of transactions differently.
    e) As a common practice, each project will need at least one "non-billable" task to capture such write-off transfers.
    3) use a write-off event (both revenue and billing) to reduce the project by the aggregate amount of all transactions in question.
    Pros:
    a) employee specific transactions and ultimately utilization results will not be impacted by the independent event transaction.
    b) by modifying our autoaccounting rules we will be able to book the "write-off" to an account other than a revenue account. (I believe, more research necessary)
    Cons:
    a) No link back to actual transactions.
    b) original transactions will remain untouched and will appear as though they were billed and will show up on the invoice and detail reports to the client along with an aggregated event for the total write-off amount.
    Any thoughts or opinions you can provide about the best practice in Oracle will be greatly appreciated.
    null

    Diana,
    Here's another response from a (very) senior Projects consultant. Her comments are in CAPS, so they can be dinstinguished from your comments:
    "I recommend following the approach she outlines in Section 2, with the following additions:
    SECTION 2) use the "special" transfer adjustment option to transfer the Transaction from the originating billable task to a non-billable Destination task on the project in question. CORRECT.
    A) SET UP THE WBS TO HAVE A TOP LEVEL NON-BILLABLE TASK, ON EVERY PROJECT, WITH A TASK NUMBER OF :"WRITE-OFF".
    B) WRITE AUTOACCOUNTING RULE , BASED ON TASK NUMBER, TO ENSURE THAT ANY TRANSACTIONS CHARGED (TRANSFERRED) TO "WRITE-OFF" TASK WILL BE POSTED TO A "WRITE-OFF/BAD DEBT" ACCT IN GENERAL LEDGER.
    C) CREATE A DFF AT THE EXPENDITURE ITEM LEVEL WHICH CAN BE POPULATED AT THE TIME OF TRANSFER, TO INDICATE WHERE THE TRX IS BEING TRANSFERRED TO. IT IS TRUE THAT TRANSFER ACTIVITY REPORT WILL TELL YOU THIS AS WELL, BUT IF YOU
    WANT TO SEE IT ONLINE DURING EXPEND. INQ, THEN DFF IS FINE.
    D) AS TO CONCERNS ABOUT "THE INTEGRITY" OF THE TRANSACTION AS IT IS SUBMITTED BY THE EMPLOYEE BEING COMPROMISED, THIS IS CERTAINLY POSSIBLE, BUT IF THIS IS A SERIOUS BUSINESS CONCERN, THEN I WOULD CONSIDER CREATING AN ALERT TO THE EMPLOYEE WHO ENTERED THE ORIGINAL TRX, ADVISING THEM OF THE CHANGE AND REQUESTING THEIR REVIEW AND OR APPROVAL OF THE TRANSFERRED TRX. I CAN SEE THIS BECOMING QUITE CUMBERSOME THOUGH, AND, OVERALL, ACCOUNTING DEPARTMENTS MANIPULATE TRANSACTIONS FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ALL THE TIME AS STANDARD PRACTICE, SO I'M NOT SURE WHY THIS IS AN ISSUE HERE.
    E) AND LASTLY, IT IS TRUE THAT AS A COMMON PRACTICE, EACH PROJECT WILL NEED A
    'WRITE-OFF" TASK AS A STANDARD PART OF IT'S WBS-- SO WHAT? IT'S JUST ONE MORE TASK IN YOUR WBS. BUILD IT INTO YOUR PROJECT TEMPLATES, AND MAKE IT NOT CHARGEABLE UNTIL WRITE OFFS BECOME NECESSARY. AS TO UTILIZATION, THERE IS NOT ENOUGH INFO IN THE CLIENT QUESTION TO ADDRESS THAT ISSUE PROPERLY.
    THAT'S ABOUT IT. HOPE THIS HELPS.
    BEST REGARDS, PAT"
    null

  • Inter company Billing document not created

    Hi,
    I am in a service industry project where invoicing is done through order ,no delivery takes place.I have done configuration related to inter company billing like Assign inter company billing type to Order ,assign plant sales area and internal customer to the ordering Sales Organisation.
    After this we are able to invoice the external customer but when we are trying to create inter company billiing document through the same order a log is created which says"Item already fully invoiced"
    What should i do now?
    Plz suggest.
    Regards,
    Satya

    Luk we are using quantity contract and through that we do DP91 for resource related billing which generate a Billing Request where sales document category is L (debit memo request) and then we billed that billing request to the end customer.But when i again use that billing request for inter company billing system says "item is fully invoiced"
    Now tell me what should i do?
    Regards,
    Satya

  • Inter - company Billing - Assign Organisational units by plant

    Hi Experts
    Im posting this since I found the same question closed, unanswered.
    We are on IS - Retail and I have done all configuration for Inter-company Billing. However when I create the inter-company billing document I get the following error, "Sales organization & is not defined"
    I checked SAP note 308989 in which it says the delivering plant (Site) needs to be attached to both the Ordering and Delivering companies Sales organisation, Distribution channel combination. Also this needs to be done as part of master data in WB02, which I have done.
    It also says that the 2 entries maintained should be present in the table in transaction OVV9 - Assign Organisational units by plant. However, in my case the attachment of the site to the ordering companies sales org. is missing in the inter-company set up. Also it does not give the option of creating a new entry.
    Appreciate if someone could help me resolve this so I could create the inter company invoice.
    Thank you,
    Afzal

    Hi Afzal,
    in all the customizing setting of note 308989 are good, then those fields should be filled.
    Please check it very carefully.
    Please check in customizing of sales order type (transaction VOV8) if the intercompany billing type maintained.
    In case of stock tranfer order intercompany (where there is not sales order), run transaction 0VLK, display the delivery type used, and check the order type present in field 'Default Ord.Ty.' (usually it is 'DL').
    Then check in VOV8 for this sales order type.
    If everything is fine, then it is necessary to debug the delivery creation.
    The field LIKP-VKOIV etc. should be filled in program FV50XFLK_LIKP_FUELLEN_IV in intercompany sales; program FV50XFLK_LIKP_FUELLEN_IV_UML in stock transfer order intercompany.
    Best regards,
    Ivano.

  • Inter company Billing for service industry

    Hi,
    I never workded over inter company billing.Please suggest me what to do? I am in a service industry project where no delivery takes place.So how should i go about for intercompany billing configuration?
    Thanx in advance.
    Regardds,
    Satya

    Dear Satya,
    You can create the inter company bill with refrence to the service order
    To do inter company billing settings go through this IMG path
    IMG>Sales and Distribution>Billing-->Intercompany billing
    Process steps for normal inter company process with delivery.
    INTER COMPANY BILLING
    Definition:
    A company arranges direct delivery of the goods to the customer from the stocks of another company belonging to the same corporate group.
    To put in simple terms, Company code A orders goods through its sales organization A from Plant B belonging to Company code B.
    It is imperative that both Plants A & B should have the material. In other words, the material is created for both the Plants A & B + their respective storage locations.
    Sales Organizations and Plants are uniquely assigned to Company codes. It is not possible to assign either a plant or a sales organization to more than one company code.
    Sales organizations and plants assigned to each other need not belong to the same company code.
    In other terms, a plant belonging to Company code A & assigned to Sales Organization A can also be assigned to Sales Organization B of Company Code B. This enables cross company sales.
    PARTIES INVOLVED
    1) End Customer 2) Ordering Company code 3) Supplying Company Code.
    End customer:
    Customer who orders goods from the ordering company code.
    Ordering Company Code:
    Which orders goods from Plant belonging to Supplying Company code through its sales organization and bills the end customer.
    Supplying Company Code:
    Supplies goods from its plant to the end customer specified by the ordering company code and bill the ordering company code.
    CONFIGURATION SETTINGS
    Assign Delivery Plant of the supplying company code to Sales Org + Distribution channel of the Ordering company code in the Enterprise Structure.
    DEFINE ORDER TYPES FOR INTERCOMPNY BILLING:
    Menu path: IMG/ SD/Billing/Intercompany Billing/Define Order Types for Intercompany billing
    Assign Organizational units by Plant:
    Menu Path: IMG/ SD/Billing/Intercompany Billing/Assign Organizational units by Plant.
    Define Internal Customer Number By Sales Organization:
    Menu Path: IMG/ SD / Billing/ Intercompany Billing/ Define Internal Customer Number By Sales Organization:
    Creating / Showing Ordering Sales Organization as Internal Customer for Supplying Company code:
    Transaction Code: XD01
    The ordering sales organization is represented as Internal customer of Supplying company code.
    We need to create customer master in Account Group - Sold to Party and maintain minimum required financial & Sales Area data.
    This internal customer number has to be assigned to the ordering sales organization. Hence, the system automatically picks up this Internal customer number whenever there is Intercompany billing.
    PRICING:
    We need to maintain two pricing procedures RVAA01 & ICAA01. Pricing procedure RVAA01 represents condition type PR00 & any other discounts or surcharges that are meant for end customer.
    We assign Pricing procedure RVAA01 to combination of Sales area (Of Ordering company code) + Customer Pricing Procedure + Document Pricing Procedure of Sales document type.
    This pricing Procedure (RVAA01) is determined both at Sales Order level & Billing processing for the end customer. We maintain PR00 condition type to represent the ordering company code's price to the end customer.
    Condition records for PR00 are maintained using organizational elements of Ordering company code, end customer & the Material.
    Eg: Sales Org. of Ordering company code + End customer + Material.
    We also need to maintain PI01 condition type to represent costs to Ordering company code (in other words revenue to supplying company code). It is statistical condition type & meant for information purpose only.
    Condition records for PI01 are created with the following key combination:
    Ordering sales Org + Supplying Plant + Material
    Pricing Procedure ICAA01is determined at Intercompany billing processing level.
    Pricing Procedure ICAA01 - Pricing Procedure for Inter company billing is assigned to the combination of: Sales Area (of supplying company code) + Document pricing Procedure of Billing document type IV + Customer Pricing Procedure of the Internal customer.
    Pricing Procedure ICAA01 has condition type IV01 that represents revenues for Supplying company code in the intercompany billing.
    PR00 condition type also appears in Intercompany billing document. It is for information purposes only and does not have bearing on the value of the document.
    PI01 represented under pricing procedure RVAA01 is reference condition type for IV01 and the same is defined in the condition type IV01. Due to this these two condition types represent same value.
    The condition type IV01 in intercompany billing document represents revenue to the Supplying Company. But its corresponding condition type PI01 in the billing document to the end customer is shown as a statistical item meant for information purposes.
    In your requirenment there will not be delivery process in between service sales order and the intercompany bill so do the settings accordingly in the copy controls between service sales order type and inter company billing type.
    I hope this will help you,
    Regards,
    Murali.
    I hope this will help you,

  • Inter company billing issue

    Hi,
    We have plant A and plant B. Plant A belongs to sales org  A and company code A and Plant B belongs to sales org B and company code B.
    we will book the sales order in sales org A but we want the  delivery plant to be B in sales order. My questions are:-
    1) In the config step of "organisational units by plant" for inter co billing, Do I need to assign the sales org A to plant B ??
    2) For determining plant B in sales order( to be booked uner sales org A), I will maintain plant B in customer master. Do I need to do some additional settings in config of  enterprise structure for determining plant B in sales order .i.e. in assigment of  enterprise structure , do i need to assign sales org A to plant B...? (in enterprise structure sales org A in any case will be assigned to plant A)
    3) In the config step , define " internal cust no by sales org". Which is the sales org for which i assign the internal customer   and under which sales org should I create the internal customer for plant ?
    regds
    Edited by: sapsd73 on Aug 23, 2010 12:29 PM

    Hi,
    Check the following links
    [IC1|Re: Inter-company sales process;
    [IC2|http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/SDBIL/SDBIL.pdf]
    [IC3|http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/print40b/EN/pdf/sdbil/sdbil.pdf]
    [IC4|Re : Problem with InterCompany Sales Configuration;
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Amit

  • Inter company billing, client and company code

    Hello,
    In inter co billing, the selling sales org and the delivery plant both belong to different company codes.
    my questions are :-
    1) Assuming my sap  production  system id is XBI, do  both the company codes need to exist in the same production system Id  XBI  for inter co billing ?
    2) if the delivery plant system id is different than XBI, then the delivery of goods from the delivery plant will qualify for inter co billing or third party sale ?
    3) Can two different companies  working on SAP have the same clients  (for eg if Hindustan Unilever and Colgate Palmolive) on SAP)
    regds

    1) Assuming my sap production system id is XBI, do both the company codes need to exist in the same production system Id XBI for inter co billing ?
    YES
    2) if the delivery plant system id is different than XBI, then the delivery of goods from the delivery plant will qualify for inter co billing or third party sale ?
    Can be inter company provided Delivery Plant is also in XBI. Else I think Third Party scenario gets applicable
    3) Can two different companies working on SAP have the same clients (for eg if Hindustan Unilever and Colgate Palmolive) on SAP)
    YES
    Regards
    Sai

  • How the information goes to the supplying plant in Inter com Billing

    Hi friends,
                    I know the configuration of Inter company billing process in a standard system(IDES).
    Also I know we have to change the delivering plant in VA01 and shipping point in VL01n and twice we hav to do the VF01 to get the customer invoice & Intercompany invoice in IDES system.
    But
    1st Q.  In real life scenario
    How the information goes( i mean the media, out put determination) from the receiving company code(Sales Org) To the supplying company code(plant)
    that the delivery should happen from the plant belongs to a different company code.
    I mean is there any special output determination process happens for inter company billing process?
    2nd Q.
    How the Internal Inter company  invoice goes from the supplying plant belongs to different comp code to the sales org of different company code.
    3rd.Q
    As an end user of a receiving company code what should be the step by step process  &
    As an end user of a delivering company code what should be the step by step process ?
    I expect the answer should be question specific. Correct answer will be rewarded. No unnecessary answer pls. Thanks with regards
    Kartik

    Hi Kartik,
    I don't know the reason why you are using words like .....(given below) in  your post. Please remember that members are not crazy about points. It doesn't earn any money or recognition. Do we know great gurus who earned thousands of points earlier in these forums. Once they are inactive, nobody remembers them. We are not favouring others by assigning points. It is a way of expressing your thanks for getting the help. People are not wasting your time, they are spending their time trying to help you. It is not compulsory for you to go thro all the posts and hence you shouldn't comment on the posts made. If you are not happy, please donot use this forum.
    Please look into the sentences you have used in this thread.,
    1.I expect the answer should be question specific. Correct answer will be rewarded. No unnecessary  
       answer pls
    2.i dont think this is the answer of my question...Pls go through the question again & answer, based on a real life scenario & from an end user view .
    3.My sincere request, Pls dont reply..if you dont know the exact SAP process
    4.I am sorry, that was not my answer....Again telling pls go through the question & answer.
    5.Where is the answer to my questions ? And how can i give you points?
    Please donot take it in a negative way. It is just a suggestion.
    THanks,
    Ravi

  • Project agreement question(pls help, a little bit urgent)

    hi,
    I created a project on PM and project funding agreement on project billing.
    But after I allocated it to a project and saved it, it shown that the amount I entered is allocated but not baselined.
    My question is why it is not baselined? what is the meaning of 'baselined'? how to operate to make it to be baselined?
    Thanks a lot in advance! ^_^

    After i made revenue budget. it is baselined.
    question solved. thanks.

  • Credit memo for Inter-company billing

    Hi
    We are trying to create a credit memo with reference to an inter company billing document. The business requirement is to create a credit memo  to adjust the invoice value due to wrong value posted in the original inter-company invoice. Hence we do not want to use the sales returns route for this.
    So, we are trying to create a credit memo request (ZCR) in VA01 with reference to the Inter company billing document (ZIV). We have maintained the copy control between ZCR and ZIV.
    However, when creating a credit memo request (ZCR) with respect to the intercompany billing document, we get the below error in the sales order.
    "Item category ZNLC is not defined" and "Check Item copy" with Message No: V1324.
    ZNLC is the item category that we used in the intercompany delivery document.
    We are able to ignore this message in sales order screen and save the credit memo request in VA01 and also create credit memo (ZG2) in VF01.
    Pl provide your inputs on whether we are missing any other configuration.
    Regards,
    John

    Hi
    I have maintained the item level copy control settings as below.
    In the copy control (VTAF) between ZCR (Credit memo request) and ZIV (Inter company billing) at the item level for ZNLC (Inter company item category coming source document), the following setup has been maintained
    Copying requirements : 303
    Copy schedule lines : Blank
    Pos / neg qty : Blank
    Pricing type : D
    Update doc flow : X
    Do not copy batch : blank
    Pl let me know if there are any other settings to be done in config.
    Thanks,
    John

  • Error while creating Inter-company billing document

    Hi All,
    Help me to solve below error while creating inter-company billing document with ref to delivery document.
    " 1190984113 000000 Company code is not defined"
    Thanks for your help.

    Hi
    Please check wheather Customer has been extended to both company codes.Also check wheather 1190984113 is a G/L account.If it is a G/L account please check wheather it has been maintained in the company code or not.If it is not maintianed then kindly maintain the G/L account and then create the Intercompany billing document
    Regards
    Srinath

Maybe you are looking for