Internal Order cause GL Missing

Dear SD Gurus,
I'm trying to use Internal Order in my account assignment tab, at item level
but whenever I put the internal order, system will issue out error message "GL account missing".
If I remove it, it will be OK and I will post.
Any idea why?
Please advice.
Regards,
Soo

Missing config - account determination

Similar Messages

  • Internal order error: AuC missing for origin assignment

    Hi,
    We had this requirement of blocking Internal Orders (their use has been discontinued from the past 2 years). I used KOK4. Many of the orders got blocked except for those of Order Type Capex. The following error appears:
    AuC missing for origin assignment LHI
    Message no. AY089
    Diagnosis
    Object concerned: Order ####### .
    The object has investment profile ABCD and origin structure IM. In investment profile ABCD, the indicator "AuC per origin structure and origin assignment" is set. However, there is no asset under construction for origin assignment LHI of origin structure IM.
    System Response
    Processing is not carried out.
    Procedure
    Create the missing asset under construction online (Change object: Extras --> Asset under construction).
    When I go the the master data of that particular Order & click on Extras --> Asset under construction, I can see many Source Assignments with assets, but against Source Assignment LHI, the asset is blank & Status shows "Create AuC"
    My queries are as follows:
    1) Is there any other way I can block internal orders?
    2) If not, then can I create Assets under Construction separately, or do I have to go to each of the Internal orders & create them (600+ orders) ?
    3) Will the system allow me to create AuC now when the Order status is REL AUC AVAC BUDG GMPS ISBD SET ?
    4) Any other suggestions?
    Request your expert advice.
    Regards,
    Sangeeta

    Any suggestions?
    Regards,
    Sangeeta

  • Report Writer Missing Data for Cost Center+Investment Internal Order

    Hi Gurus,
    I have met a problem on Report writer. T-code KSBB -> Report for Cost Center Group by Cost Elements in diff months.
    The report can be drilled down to call KSB1 to give line items on the cost element by cost center/group.
    The problem is the drill-down report missed the line items for investment orders. ( Compared with manually use KSB1)
    The overhead internal order line items are fine.
    For example, document 001-Apr:
    Dr. Cost Element 1009                 $900  -- BA 90  Cost Center 90000 Investment order 9001
         Cr. Other cost elements.                  $900
    Document 002-Apr
    Dr. Cost Element 1009                 $800 -- BA90 Cost Center 90000 Overhead order 7001
         Cr. Other cost elements                      $800
    In KSBB report, the cost center group for 90000 in cost element 1009 in Apr only has $800.
    And the drilled down report which called KSB1 has the line item for docuemnt 002.
    However, when I run KSB1 directly, the total amount for cost element 1009 in cost center 90000 is $1700.
    Here is what I checked:
    1. I have my ABAPer checked the KSBB program and KSB1 program to debug them in DEV ( DEV and PRD has the same problem). The different to get the data is that in KSB1, it has selected a value type 11 ( Googled: field name is WRTTP, Down payments as expenses. In program: WRTTP means Statistically Actual ) and 04 ( Googled: Actual True Posting. In program: 04 in WRTTP means Actual posting).
    But in KSBB, it only select 04 when I clicked the drill down report to call KSB1.
    2. I am thinking that the cause was on different types of internal order:
    Overhead internal orders are statistical orders.  Investment orders are actual orders.
    Could you help to throw some light on the problem?
    Thank you very much.
    Emma

    Hi,
    Cost Centre vise Report you can take from KSB1
    Internal Order Vise Report you can take fro KOB1
    Regards,
    Sridhar Sha

  • Internal Order field missing on various entry screens

    Hi,
    In our production client, we don't see internal order field. It was there before. But somehow it just disappeared on screen like FB50, FB60, FB70 etc. I can see the internal order field in other environments. Can you please tell me how I can get the field back?
    Thanks in Advance

    Hi,
    Please check in FB50 the following:
    If you go to configuration (the little chart above the G/L block) -> (Box or button blue and yellow above scroll bar right side.) Then double click on configutation pick button administrator.
    You will see that some fields are flagged as "hidden". (invisible)
    Check if Internal order is hidden. If yes, unflag that selection, activate, save and check the results.
    Unflag also all the fields required.
    Please also review the following Note:
    546889     FAQ: Screen variants in FI Enjoy Transa
    186961     Maintenance of screen variants for Enjoy tr
    180504     Enjoy+screen variant: Missing authorization
    I hope it helps.
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa Barth.

  • Problem in Reversal of settled Internal Order

    I am trying to reverse some internal orders already settled. But while doing test run for collective reversing of settled I.O. I am getting error that I.O number is missing in the text field. I think while reversing system is not picking data for text field. The user have tried this before and it as working then. There is an OSS note 126363 on simmilar problem but not exact problem and it rfered it as a programing error.
    Any body facing such experience or any suggetion is welcomed. This is an urgent requirement as user want to close the period.
    Regards,
    Arun Agarwal

    Hi,
    You can reverse a posted settlement using the settlement transaction, as long as the settlement documents that belong to it have not been reorganized. However, you can only reverse the most recently carried out settlement. If you have to reverse an older settlement, you first have to reverse the most recent settlements (following it) in reverse chronological order.
    The above is simply conceptual. But in your case, your problem appears to be something different. You can consider debugging the case to find out the cause so that the remedial action can be determined.
    You can also check the relevant document type to make the document header text as 'not required' to complete the process.
    Please let me know if this helps.
    Cheers.
    Dhananjai

  • Transfer cost & revenue to internal order defined inthe service order.

    Dear Experts,
      On release, service order creates internal order that collects cost & revenue for the job. My requirement is to transfer these costs & revenue to a different internal order through crm order itself. In CRM order there is option to assign the account assignment object as " Internal Order ". This is under tab Account Assignment. Here we can enter any internal order no.
    On saving order doesnt throw any error message. But Cost & revenues are not transafered to the I/O mentioned in the CRM service order.Is there any config. setup missing or should we look for BADI enhancement.
    Can anyone help me in fixing this issue Plz. Your early response would be most appreciated.
    Thank U,
    Regards
    Devika.S

    Hi,
    Just to get cleared, have you set up a Billing Engine in CRM and also the Administrate Console for Billing to flow in CRM with Middleware settings + Item Category (Billing Relevance)
    Cause the above are very necessary for your requirement.
    Apart from those, in ECC, you need to maintain values  under
    IMG>Integration with other mySAP.com components>CRM>Settings for Service Process>Billing Integration
    Hope this information helps, as I am assuming it that others are maintained by you.
    Regards,
    Madde

  • Sales order cost objective vs OKB9  Internal order cost object.

    Hi All,
    we facing an  issue with sales order cost objective vs OKB9 cost object.
    For IC PO service material, we assigned account assignment category 4.Reasonis Service material was not showing on G\R account.
    The G\L account 7898788, we assigned to Service Item (material type DIEN)  , for G\Cost 7898788 cost element is assigned in OKB9. Combination business + order 3478787.
    Now conflict with sales order cost objective vs OKB9  internal order cost object.
    While posting intercompany IR posting system thronging below error messageu2026
    Enter only one true account assignment
    Message no. KI249
    Diagnosis
    You made assignments to several objects in CO (cost center, order, project etc.). 2 of these have been created as true objects.
    System Response
    You are allowed only one account assignment for each cost-relevant account
    How to resolve this issue.. Do I make any config changes in the system to overcome this issue?
    Or any sub account to assin in VKOA config for internal orderu2026
    Regards,
    Adi

    Hi Waman,
    Thanks for your inputs.
    Issue :  IR failed to post for wax  Sales Order -> ICPO  - Error:  Enter only one true account assignmentu2019.
    Background:
    Original setup  in  Test system   & Productionu2013 account determination for servive (DIEN) account assignment category u20184u2019 was linked to G/L Account  34444444, As part of project orange u2019, account determination was linked to account u201889710100u2019.
    Account u20188970100u2019   34444444 was replaced with 8970100 ,is not linked to any cost center & always post with reference to IC Sales Order as per config in OKB9 based on company code (US99) + cost element (89701100) + business area (9yyy). This caused a conflict while posting IR, system could not determine exact order for posting financial value.
    Conflict:  Actual Sales Order 34789343 is  linked to PO via account assignment category & IC dummy sales order (8014331) is determine via config setting. Two cost objects cannot be linked to one IR G/L account booking.
    Regards,
    Adi

  • GR/IR -Internal Order

    I have done the following process:
    a) Created purchase requisition with account assignment catedory A and assigned AUC # and Internal Order #.
    Committments are getting booked at internal order. Looks fine.
    b) Created purchase order with reference of PR. Committment is transfered from PR to PO at internal order. Looks
    fine.
    c) When I am doing a GR for that AUC with ref to PO, AUC number and internal order # is assigned in GR document. In
    the accounting doc, AUC is getting debit and GR/IR account is getting credit.But neither internal order is showing
    up in the accounting document nor its updating committments at internal order.
    What's missing? How can i get the GR updated to internal order.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Please check all these are in sink or not?
    The acquisition transaction types in Asset Accounting have to be designated as relevant to the budget.
    The APC asset balance sheet accounts have to be defined as statistical cost elements.
    The APC asset balance sheet accounts have to have a field status group that should allow additional account assignment to orders
    Regards,
    Murali

  • Settlement Rule for Internal Order

    Hi All
    I have Maintained Settlement rule for Internal order as under
    CAT - FXA
    Settlement Receiver - Asset
    % - 100
    Settlement type - Full
    Now after settlement of above Order in KO88 . I want again use above internal order. Hence i have trying to put Settlement rule 50% for some anther asset but system gave me following error. Please guide on this issue.
    Total = 50.00%, ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ), period 010/2011
    Message no. KD042
    Diagnosis
    You have entered distribution rules which settle 50.00% in total. This applies for settlement view ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ) in period 010/2011.
    When checking the percentage total, the system found one of the following errors:
    The total percentage for the distribution rules is more than 100%
    The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and this is a rule for full settlement.
    The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and the 100% check is switched on in the settlement profile.

    Hi:
            Please refer to the contents of OSS Note 45612 - IM: pre-settlement does not work, or KD042... which states
    "Symptom
        1. If a preliminary settlement rule (for example, to cost center) is entered for individual items of capital investment measures with line item management, this rule is not considered during periodic settlement. There is no settlement to cost centers.
        2. If you enter a final settlement rule for individual line items of investment measures with line item management for a partial capitalization (that is, the percentage rate is less than 100%), then you receive the unjustified error message KD042 "Total percent = xx%".
    Additional key words
    KOB5, CJ70, CJ88, CJ8G, KO88, KO8G, preliminary settlement, partial settlement, partial capitalization
    Cause and prerequisites
        1. You did not enter the settlement type ACT in the preliminary settlement rule.
        You can check this in the Line Item Apportionment transaction by choosing the menu option "Goto" -> "Overview dist. rules" to display the distribution rule groups entered so far.
        The system displays rules which have no entry in the "SetTyp" field (settlement type, field name PERBZ).
        2. The check of the percentages is incorrect.
    Solution
        1. Install the following correction. Afterwards reverse the incorrect settlement, re-enter the preliminary settlement rule and settle again.
        2. Install the following correction. Afterwards, you can maintain the settlement rule for the partial settlement.
        Note: If you want to use a default settlement rule (maintaining the settlement rule from the master data maintenance transaction), then you are required to distribute the line items at 100%. In order to carry out a partial capitalization (settlement of less than 100%), you have to use menu path "Actual postings -> Period-end closing -> Settlement -> Line item "
    Regards

  • How to restrict Internal Order master data changes

    Hi Experts,
    We have internal orders that have no Functional Area assigned to it at the beginning of the month, but part way through the month a change is made to the master data and a Functional Area gets assigned to the internal order.  When settlement is run at the end of the month, part of the internal order has a FA blank and part of the internal order has a FA of OPEX or G&A depending on what was assigned in the master data.  This causes an issue because they don't offset.
    Typically if no change was made to the master data during the month, all the transactions to the internal order with FA blank would offset and there would be no issues on settlement.
    So, how can we control in the system that does not allow changes?.
    Thanks 
    Sanju

    Hi Sanju
    If FA is not needed at all in the IO- hide that field in the order type screen layout.
    Otherwise, restrict the authorization to someone who understands the criticality of it
    Last resort, implement user exit which won't allow to add FA if transaction data exists. You can search for the exits as COOPA* in SMOD
    Br. Ajay M

  • Problem with internal order creation using BAPI_INTERNALORDER_CREATE. Help!

    Hi Experts,
    I am facing a strange problem in SAP. I have a scenario where I am integrating a .Net application with SAP R/3 via SAP XI.
    The .Net application is calling XI web service via SOAP adapter. The XI then sends the data to the SAP R/3 system via RFC adapter.
    XI calls the BAPI u201CBAPI_INTERNALORDER_CREATEu201D to create a new internal order in the R/3 system.
    This scenario works perfectly fine when tested via XIu2019s runtime workbench or any SOAP or web service testing tool. New internal order gets created in the R/3 system without any issue. But when I test the same via the .Net application I found that the order is getting created properly but some fields like currency and cost center are disabled or grayed out in change mode. Have you encountered this problem earlier? Any clue what could be the root cause?
    Please help!
    thanks
    Gopal

    Hi Sampanth,
        I think you did not understood my scenario. In real time or production situation I have to use .Net application to send data to XI. The XI will then send the same to R/3 system to create the internal order.
    The .Net code is calling the XI's webservice using C# code and sends the data as a SOAP request.
    How can .Net code grayout some fields in SAP R/3 system? Can you elaborate on what are you trying to explain?
    Thanks
    Gopal

  • Internal order Type creation

    Hi Guru,
    My client want to create new internal order type. so My doubt is new order type need to create directly in production server or not. Because development server orders type and production server order type there is some miss match is there.
    Kindly adviceu2026..
    Reg,
    Bharath

    Hi,
    Certainly, not. It's a customization issue and should be initiated from DEV. When you create a change request (automatically) the system will pick only modifications (your new order type), so there should be no problem with inconsistencies.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Amount in PR not reflected on Internal Order .

    HI SAP,
    When i creating a PR i got sap message said "Do Not assign any objects in cost accounting to account XXXXXXXX ". Then i just press enter because it just a warning from SAP.
    My total Valution Price in PR is 10K. My PR is using Account Assignment A and have internal order (BUDGET)
    After saving. i check my internal order report (S_ALR_87013019), than i noticed that my total amount in PR is not reflected on My internal Order list.
    is there any condition missing ?

    >
    Nizamkz wrote:
    > HI SAP,
    >
    > When i creating a PR i got sap message said "Do Not assign any objects in cost accounting to account XXXXXXXX ". Then i just press enter because it just a warning from SAP.
    >
    > My total Valution Price in PR is 10K. My PR is using Account Assignment A and have internal order (BUDGET)
    >
    > After saving. i check my internal order report (S_ALR_87013019), than i noticed that my total amount in PR is not reflected on My internal Order list.
    >
    > is there any condition missing ?
    The above warning message meant that your cost accounting is not configured for this account, in this case your account was not linked with internal orders, thats why it did not pick up the price there. You need to consult with FI to get this account fixed, or use some other account which is linked to internal order.

  • Internal Order Budgeting with Purchase Order

    Hi,
    I am creating a purchase order for a material with account assigned as Order.
    I have maintained a substitution wherein from a cost center Internal Order is derived.
    I have created an Internal Order with Category - Overhead and activated the availability control for the Order. Also maintained the Budget for the Internal Order.
    Now when I am creating the Purchase Order and giving the Cost center, it is deriving the Internal order but not doing the availability check.
    What can be the issue in terms of Configuration or Am I missing any steps.
    Please help
    Regards
    Kami

    Thanks Eli,
    If I activate the committment Management at Controlling Area level and the order type, the budget will be consumed at the Purchase Order level itself. I hope I am right ?
    But I want , at PO level only the control and check (in terms of error message and the system should not allow me to save the PO) and not the consumption of budget. I want to utilise the budget only at the time of issuance of the materials.
    Can we achieve this without Committment management active or is it mandatory?
    Any help on this.
    Thanks and regards
    Kami

  • Posting Asset Acquisition to Internal Order

    Hello Gurus,
    We are using an Investment Order to collect the actual acquisition cost of an asset.
    ie, When we do F-90, we are assigning an Investment Order to the asset line item, but the problem is that after the posting of F-90, the value of the transaction does not reflect in the IO reports.
    Please advice, what could be the cause and if there is any way in which the transaction can be reflected in the IO reports.

    Hey Sachin,
    That was a really nice reply, thanks a lot.
    However the scenario here is a little different. Here all procurement expenses are being posted thru PR and PO to an AUC and in such PO a Cost Center [for real posting] and a statistical Internal Order[Investment Order type] is being assigned.
    So, here no settlement is taking place between the IO and the AUC.
    Now, at the end the AUC is being settled to the final asset.
    The users complaint [always complaining ; - )] is that when the AUC is being settled to the Final Asset, the value is not reaching the IO, where they have posted a budget and want to compare the actual with the budget.
    Looking forward to hear soon from you.
    Thanks Again

Maybe you are looking for