Internal order: multiple settlement

Hi all,
I need to settle one particular cost element from an internal order to a cost center. All the remaining cost elements should be then settled to another receiver. I can have several settlement receivers but only one allocation structure.
I can use assessment or distribution but the aim is to have all these values in the "Credit from settlement" part of standard reports.
Any idea on how to achieve this?

Hi John
you need to use source structure with 2 separate parts as shown below (1 for cost elements to cc and the second for others)
then create allocation structure with the same logic (for each one of the parts mentioned)
and then use them to a settlement profile. When you maintain the order and specifically the settlement rule you need to attach the respective source structure to each one of the receivers of your order. (that means 2 lines one for cc with associated source structure and a second line with second source to other objects)
Hope it helps
Panagiotis

Similar Messages

  • Report on Internal orders not settled

    HI All,
    I need a report on the open internal orders which are yet to be settled.
    Thanks
    Z

    Hi,
    You can check the following standard report;
    S_ALR_87012995 - List: Orders
    If any Order shows a balance in the Actual column that means either it is not settled or there are still balances which can be settled. A zero in Actual means that the order is fully settled for the reporting period.
    Thanks,

  • Foreign currency posting to Internal order and settlement

    Hi All,
    The payment posted to an internal order was in a foreign currency then translated into usd.  The settlement used a different exchange rate so in usd there was a balance.
    How do we rectify this..?
    Regards
    Ashok PRabhu

    Hi
    I am not sure how IS-H works.. But for sure, it should allow you to enter 3 stat objects...
    There would be some ABAP trick pertaining to IS-H which I am not aware of...
    I can guide you a bit...  During SD billing, ask abaper to put a break point and manually enter the values for cost center and IO and then post the doc.... One of these 2 will be the outcomes
    a. Either it will get posted or
    b. It will get over written before posting....
    based on the outcome, you will have to decide your next course of action
    Also, if your cost center to IO is one to one mapping (Chances would be rare), you can simply write a substitution which would always prevail
    I am sorry I could not offer you a complete solution.. But, this is what comes to my mind...
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Internal order not settling as asset is already deactivated.

    Hi friends,
    when iam trying to post KO88 internal order settlement it is giving the message that "ASSET xxxxxxxxxx is deactivated",in my settlement rule there is not that asset another asset no is there,
    where is the link for asset and IO ?
    How to see the deactivated asset?
    thanks,
    Srini.

    Hello,
    Might be your said asset number is sub asset no. which is coming in the error msg asset no.
    first check the relation between error msg asset and which asset you are going to do settelement.
    The asset deacivation button will available in the Asset master record general data.
    If helpful pls assign points,
    Rams

  • Internal Orders - Primary Settlement vs Secondary Settlement

    Internal Orders
    Our current settlement profile allows for settlement from primary to
    secondary.
    In the Business Intelligence (BI) project the secondary accounts are not included in the
    fin statements. This causes problems within certain Comp. Codes when looking at the
    income statements at plant level.
    Another issue with the settlement to secondary accounts is that the
    budget displays on the primary account but the settlements from PM comes
    through on the secondary account. This causes further calculation
    issues when evaluating budgets.
    Will the settlement profile for primary to primary settlement provide an answer or should we include sedondary accounts in the Business Intelligence project?.

    HI,
    as PIET mentioned secondary cost elements are CO unique. If there is a need to display these values in accounting (you are using reconciliation ledger or Fi/CO online integration), use CO substitution (OKC9) callup-point 60 to assign account number(s) to secondary cost element(s). Otherwise just only one account number (OK17) captures to value of all secondary cost elements.
    BR Christian

  • Internal Order # not settle

      Hi,
    The Internal order # 10010 has $5000  that did not settle during transaction KO8G.
    Why did this order not settle? How can I settle it correctly?
    Thank you.

    Hi
    Settle this order from KO88, in test run.. System will show you the error message, if any
    Rectity the error and Process KO88 again
    Check if the Settlement rule is maintained
    Br. Ajay M

  • Scheduling Internal Order for Settlement

    Hi
    Can some body explain me how to schedule Internal order settlement. My company would like to settle the Internal orders automaticaly using schedule manager
    thanks
    Prasad

    You can do so by having a settlement profile that permits settlement to fixed assets and assigned to the order type.

  • Internal order for settlement

    Hi,
    Is  possible to set up an additional order types that can settle to an asset account number. presently we donu2019t have this type but it may be use full for track our assets.
    It is very urgent I will assign points
    Thanks
      Radha

    You can do so by having a settlement profile that permits settlement to fixed assets and assigned to the order type.

  • Problem in Reversal of settled Internal Order

    I am trying to reverse some internal orders already settled. But while doing test run for collective reversing of settled I.O. I am getting error that I.O number is missing in the text field. I think while reversing system is not picking data for text field. The user have tried this before and it as working then. There is an OSS note 126363 on simmilar problem but not exact problem and it rfered it as a programing error.
    Any body facing such experience or any suggetion is welcomed. This is an urgent requirement as user want to close the period.
    Regards,
    Arun Agarwal

    Hi,
    You can reverse a posted settlement using the settlement transaction, as long as the settlement documents that belong to it have not been reorganized. However, you can only reverse the most recently carried out settlement. If you have to reverse an older settlement, you first have to reverse the most recent settlements (following it) in reverse chronological order.
    The above is simply conceptual. But in your case, your problem appears to be something different. You can consider debugging the case to find out the cause so that the remedial action can be determined.
    You can also check the relevant document type to make the document header text as 'not required' to complete the process.
    Please let me know if this helps.
    Cheers.
    Dhananjai

  • Settling investment internal orders to an asset (AA310 msg)

    hi.
    I am wondering if somebody can shed some light for me on the following:
    let's say we have 2 investment internal orders (representing 2 different projects) which are to be settled to one asset.
    for the 1st order the job was done and the status changed to TECO in 2010. Upon full settlement (KO8G, full ) the cost has been settled to an asset (from AuC) and the asset has been capitalized. the capitalization (aquisition) date was set to the end of the period (e.g. Dec 31, 2010).
    the status of the 2nd order has been changed to TECO in 2011. Currently when I'm trying to do a full settlement of the 2nd IO (with KO8G, partial capilazation) I'm getting AA310 (asset value date in diff year) as far as the system is trying to default the asset value date to date when the IO status was chagned to TECO (2011).  I do not want to default the asset value date on the KOG8 screen.
    The question - what is wrong in my approach and what should I do in the case I have a second investment orders to settle to a final asset.
    Sorry if I was not clear, i'm primarly an abaper but trying to understand some business processes related to internal orders and settlement. any information to understand this relationship would be appreciated.
    thank you,
    viktor

    Creation of Internal Order- KO01
    Maintain Settlement receiver as the AUC asset
    Settle the Internal Order- KO88
    Now the values have come to AUC asset
    Distribution of AUC- AIAB
    Enter the Settlement receiver as the Main Asset
    Settlement of AUC- AIBU

  • Internal order settlement to G/L account

    Dear All,
    User has created one internal order 650002012 and the settlement profile is created settle to G/L account S882000000. this is a cost element category "1" (Loss on contract cancellation & co).
    In the internal order The Responsible cost center is DA01D89998 (Validation & Eng Admin-St) the profit center for this "DA01".
    In the internal order the Requesting cost center is DA26ZPSHRD (Shared Cost Center for Deltron), the profit center is "DA26"
    in the settlement profile when i double click on the settlement rule, he has assigned the Cost center DA01ZPSHRD (Shared Cost Center for Ko) and the profit center is "DA01".
    But when he execute the T.C "KO8G" the system is showing the error is " G/L account requires an assignement to CO object".
    1. The receiver G/L account has created as a cost element. is this correct?
    2. In the allocation structure do we have to select the "By cost element check box" or do we have to give the secondary cost element in the settlement cost element field.
    Please give the sugessions to solve this problem.
    Thanks and regards,
    Rao.

    It sounds like you are a little confused on how internal order settlement works.  If you want the internal order to settle to a G/L account then you must enter the G/L account number in the settlement rule in the internal order.  To do this, click on the settlement rule button in the order, select category G/L and enter the G/L account number.  In order for you to be able to select G/L as a settlement object the settlement profile you've assigned to the order must allow this.  Check the settlement profile and make sure that G/L account is listed as settlement optional or settlement required.  Also check the allocation structure that is attached to the settlement profile. In the allocation structure you must have an entry under the settlement cost element for receiver category G/L.  Here you should specify a cost element of type 22 as the settlement cost element.
    When you make those settings you will be able to specify the receiving G/L account in the internal order.  The system will then credit the internal order for the settlment amount with the credit posted on the category 22 cost element specified in the allocation structure.  The debit will appear on the G/L account you specified in the internal order's settlement rule.  Normally, the receiving G/L account would not be setup as a cost element.  if you do set it up as a cost element you will need to use an automatic account assignment setting (OKB9) to specify the cost object that it will post to.
    thanks,

  • Showing Settled Internal Orders

    Hi,
    In our company at the end if each month we settle our Internal Orders to a number of cost centres, so when we then run a report for that Internal Order(after settling) it shows as blank on the report....and thats fine.
    Now there is a requirement to see what the costs sitting on the Internal Order were origianlly....before they were settled to cost centres, is their any report/or way to show the Internal Order before we settled it?

    Hi,
    You can check the line items posted to Internal Order for the specific range of posting dates in transaction code KOB1. I think this report should be helpful to analyse the posting before making settlement.
    Thanks
    Murali.

  • Problem during Internal Order settlement

    Dear Sir,
    we have a scenario where we have Internal Order and using Internal Order we first bring cost to AUC and then settle AUC to final Asset .
    Against an Internal Order , under settlement rule we have created 1 number AUC and 2 different Final Assets .  We have been able to succesfully settle AUC to Final Asset (first Final Asset) . Now subsequently we want to settle the remaining AUC to the second final Assets and for settlement we used Tcode Ko88 . During Ko88 , we are getting the error :
    "Either the sender is already settled, or there is nothing to settle
    Message no. KD213 "
    Although there is balance available against AUC .
    We request you to kindly help us , as how to resolve the reported error .
    Regards
    Sonia

    Hi
    As you mentioned that you had settled the cost from internal order to AUC and then settlement from AUC to 2 final assets. For order to AUC settlement we use KO88.but for AUC to final assets you must use TCode AIAB and define distribution rule to settle to assets.
    As you already have settled the order values to AUC you have nothing to settle from order. As the order values fully transferred to AUC you are getting the error message "Either the sender is already settled, or there is nothing to settle".
    Now use the transaction AIAB to transfer the values from AUC to final assets.
    You cannot use transaction KO88 to settle AUC to final asset.
    This will resolve your problem.let me know if you still have any issue.
    Thank you
    venkat

  • Posting settled internal order costs to PM Order

    Hi,
    Our client doesn't have PM module upto now. So they posted all the maintenance costs to internal orders. All the internal orders are settled properly. Now they want to implement PM module. They want the costs previously posted in internal order should be reflected in PM orders.
    How it will possible?  Any inputs please.. is the historical PM order helps???
    Regards
    Radha

    Radha,
    Technically speaking, yes its possible.
    But do you know which costs were booked against each equipment?
    Even if you do, then you will need to write an ABAP program to create PM orders and then move the costs from the settlement orders to the PM orders in the period thatg they were accrued. This is a big job.
    If you only need a record of the equipment costs (ie not move the actual costs) then the simpler approach would be to use Historical Orders.
    PeteA

  • Internal Order: Settlement AUC

    Hi Guru's,
    Need a reply on following:
    1. When you are using the Internal order to accumulate costs of an AUC ,
        what happens when you are settling the order
                      (a) Periodically (PER)
                      (b) Finally   (FUL)
    2. Please tell the precise entries happening.at the time of periodic and full settlement.
    I wud be very much thankful
    Anuradha Ambekar
    TCS

    Hello,
    Please find below answers to your queries:
    1. When the internal order is settled to the AUC periodically, and then the final settlement is done what is the entry that is done.
    Ans : Settlement to Auc
    Dr. Auc xxxx
    Cr. Cost element xxxx (which was originally debited) with reference to cost object (Internal order)
    Final settlement
    Dr. Actual (Main) Assets xxxx
    Cr. AuC xxxx
    2.Secondly if you have an AUC for the Internal order, is it possible still that you settle the order to the Main Asset.
    Ans: NO, First you need to settle the order to AuC and transfer the cost from AuC to Main assets, This is the process, system will not allow you to settle directly to Main asset.
    3.once you periodically settle the order to the AUC, The balances are now in AUC and not the Internal order. Correct? then when this order is settled in full, How is it that the order picks up the data from AUC and settles it to the Asset?
    Ans: Your first sentence is correct,  the settlement to Main assets are happening from AuC (which is craeted as Investment measure) and not from the Order. the order is linked to AuC.
    regards,
    radhakrishna

Maybe you are looking for