Invoice in RTF - issues

All,
I created an RTF for the Invoice Print Selected invoice report.
However the ship-to address, bill-to address on the top of the invoice, is not repeating on the 2nd page if my invoices lines go into second page.
I tried the Word - Table property - "Repeat as header row at the top of each page". It is not working when I preview my report in PDF.
Thank You for any feedback
Padma.

Ravi,
Thank You for your reply.
I created a new document, created one table with 2 rows and 1 column. I just have the remit to address in the first row. I made sure that the table has the property set as "Repeat as header row at the top of each page".
I saved the document and ran the Preview=>PDF. Still the remit to address does not repeat on each page.
I am on 5.6.2 version
Thanks in advance,
PAdma

Similar Messages

  • AP invoice workbench performance issue.

    Hi Guys,
    We have a production system with RHEL 5 ,R12 12.0.6 and DB:10.2.0.4
    WE are facing Performance issue in Inovoice workbench were users when click on Inovoice  batches or Inovoices it takes a lot of time to open the invoice form.
    Also Validation of inovoices consumes a lot of time which is unaccepted .
    Request you please give some pointers or note id to followd already have locked an SR with oracle .
    This is urgent
    Regards,
    Milan

    Please see these docs.
    R12 Invoice Workbench Form Has A Performance Issue [ID 1072338.1]
    Bad Performance When Checking Funds In Invoice Workbench [ID 1091280.1]
    Bad Performance In Invoice Workbench (APXINWKB) Find Window When Searching By Purchase Order [ID 1195623.1]
    R12 AP Invoice Workbench Performance Issues [ID 957105.1]
    Poor Performance On Invoice Validation In The Invoice Workbench [ID 1130313.1]
    Invoice Workbench> Actions: Pay in Full Performance Issue [ID 983804.1]
    Invoice Workbench (APXINWKB) Performance Issue While Selecting The Self Assessment Check Box [ID 1210340.1
    Performance of Project Expenditure LOV At AP Invoice Header in Invoice Workbench [ID 1143943.1]
    R12.1.1 Performance Problem in AP Invoice Workbench [ID 861205.1]
    R12 Invoice Performance FAQs [ID 579737.1]
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • Error of Excise Invoice in Consignment Issue billing document

    The usual process of billing from excisable unit (with CIN) is as follows:
    1. VA01 >2.  VL01N(PGI)> 3. VF01 (Proforma Inv) --> 4. J1IIN (Excise Inv) --> 5. VF01 (Comm Inv)
    While in non-Excisable unit the 3 & 4 steps are not required.
    In Consignment Fill-up- The process is only upto Generation of Excise Invoice and order processing is complete. Excise Invoice in this case works as Excise Gate pass- just to let the material out of factory gates and no sales is booked.
    Further, In consignment issue- the process should be like non-exciseable unit i.e. 1, 2 & 5 step only. While we are getting the error is coming at step no 5 (Excise Invoice no is missing !)
    One more thing I want to ask:
    During Consignment fill-up, movement type 631 is used - which removes the stock from storage location and put it in 'Consignment stock in the same plant. Now since the plant is declared as excisabel, probably it is asking for 'Excise invoice'. It means, there is one more step of material movement, before 'Issue' order- what could be it ??
    Please help.
    Praveen Singh

    The correct process in consignment fillup process is
    a)  Create fillup Order (order type KB)
    b)  Create fillup Delivery  (movement type 631)
    c)  Create F8 proforma
    d)  Create Excise Invoice referencing Proforma
    a)  Create Consignment Issue Order (Order type KE)
    b)  Create Issue Delivery (movement type 633)
    c)  Create Commercial Invoice (billing type F2)
    In the second stage only, you need to create commercial invoice and not  in the first stage as indicated by you.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Collective Invoice - Actual Goods Issue date

    Hi Friends,
    Collective invoice topic has been discussed many times but I didn't find exact solution to solve my issue.
    From sap help and few other threads it is learnt that Billing type, Billing date, Payer, Billing unit, Terms of payment, Incoterms, Letter of credit should be same to have collective invoice. During my tests it is understood that apart from those Actual Goods Issue date (Post Goods Issue) date should be same to have collective invoice for different sales orders/deliveries. In my tests SAP didn't consider Billing date but it did consider Actual GI date. In other words, even the billing date and other requirements are same invoice split happend due to different Actual GI date. However collective invoice created even though the billing date is different but Actual GI date is same.
    My user creates one sales order and one delivery for a customer once in a week (so 4 orders/deliveries in a month) and creates Invoice by end of the month with collective invoice. So based on the above tests I can ask the user to create sales orders, deliveries every week but perform Post Goods Issue month end and then create invoice so that collective invoice can be done. But the issue is they want to do the Post Goods Issue every week because the stock levels should reduce on weekly basis. So how can we create collective invoice even though the Post Goods Issue is done weekly (so Actual GI date will be different)
    Any idea? Please let me know if further information required.
    Thank you

    Hi,
    You may consider writing a routine under copying requirements so that invoice is not split even if the Actual GI date is different.
    Consider the following [thread|Collective billing; for more info.
    Regards,
    Amit

  • Sales invoice cannot be issued due to a wrong DP amount deducted

    please help on what might be the reason to this error. I usually get the error: CSO XXXXX DP amount deducted in invoice XXXX is more than issued XXXXX

    Can you please share the error message no and the description, so that one can guide you correctly

  • PDF to RTF issue needs resolving

    Hi all
    I am using OS X 10.7.2 and have an issue converting scanned PDFs to RTF using Automator.  Now here's the issue:  When I scan text from my HP All-In-One C6180 and use HP scan I am ble to select this resulting PDF file and place it into my PDF to RTF Convertor made in Automator and I can easily pull out the text and then load it into Word for editing. Not a problem. However, if I use Preview or Image Capture to scan using the HP All-In-One the resulting file will open as a PDF without a problem but if I attempt to convert it to RTF I just end up with an empty file. I can't seem to put my finger on the problem.  Any help would be appreciated.  Cheers. 

    Hi wasilh,
    I'm sorry that you're experiencing trouble with ExportPDF. It sounds as though the ExportPDF service is timing out before it can process the entire file (which can happen when a file is complex, even if it's within the 100 MB file size limit).
    Clear the browser cache and try converting again, or try using a different web browser. If that fails, you might want to give Acrobat a try.
    Acrobat lets you save directly to Word format, so you might want to try a free 30-day trial to get this document converted. For more information, see www.adobe.com/products/acrobat.html.
    Best,
    Sar

  • RE:Invoice & GRN mismatch issue

    Hi All,
    one of my user is facing an issue with regards to Invoices not being allocated to the right GRNu2019s.  This causes some invoices to be paid without approval, and other invoices that have been approved to be blocked for payment.
    for ex:
    We have a order of a quantity of 100
    We receive an invoice (qty 10)  this is posted
    We complete the GRN (qty 10)
    This should release for payment but unfortunately just prior to the bacs run and running MRBR to unblock any invoices we post another invoice for a qty of 10. 
    Now the total GRN and Inv values mismatch and no invoices will be paidu2026..
    The cycle goes on and on and more invoices are blocked for payment, even though some GRNu2019s are completed.
    is there any way we can apply a fix to force those invoices that match a GRN be approved for payment even if the totalu2019s donu2019t match (so the matches will occur line by line and not from the totals)?
    Thanks

    Make sure you use goods receipt based invoice verification (set GRbasedIV flag in vendor master)

  • Exporting to rtf issues

    i have a file that has tons of tables and when i export from indesign to rtf, a return is added at the end of every cell. how can i keep it from doing that?

    Post Author: nan
    CA Forum: Exporting
    Hi synapsevampire, thanks for replying.   synapsevampire:- Even though i've used Tahoma size 11 fonts, when i open the document in MSWord 2000, they have a size of 10.5.
    Same here, I changed it to a Tahoma 11.5 and it results in size 11... Well, i guess it's a bug then. I hope something will be done about it before i have to change all of my reports...     synapsevampire:  So i guess it's a bug then. I hope it gets corrected before i have to change all reports...
    - In the exported file, the "line spacing" setting i have set to "exact 16" is ignored and set to the default "single spacing". This happened in CR 8.5 too.
    No surprise there, as those are settings within Crystal, not Word. Very few programatic features are exported to any other format, it just emulates them. I wonder why is that. It shouldn't be that difficult to pass these settings to word. Anyway...  synapsevampire:
    - Moving textboxes around from one page to another and then saving and reoppening, sometimes causes MSWord to delete all text from the document. I cannot be sure if this is an issue of MSWord or CR XI but i'm reporting it just in case...
    Ummm, moving textboxes while in Word you mean? That would be a Word issue. I thought of that too, that's why i tried out the Editable RTF format which was a major dissapointment with the way it handles (or rather does not handle) paragraphs. I really hope something can be done about it because it's a very convenient format, for me at least.

  • 203 Invoice Process chain Issue

    Greetings All!
    We have been facing an issue where the standard 203 Invoice PC has become cleint dependent .The client which it is pointing is not even existing in BI system configs.Due to this we are not able to open this process chain for editing as well..We tried to delete this process chain and re-instaal from the Business content,but when we are trying that still teh issue of client dependency is coming.The ssyetem gives an error stating
    "Chain 0ASA_P041 can only be edited in client 300"
    The extended message also shows the follwoing
    Object 0ASA_P041 (Process Chain) could not be collected for object ()
    Message no. RSO296
    Diagnosis
    You have collected objects in the BI Metadata Repository. Associated objects for object  of type  have also been collected. Object 0ASA_P041 of type Process Chain was among these objects.
    However, this object 0ASA_P041 of type Process Chain is not available in the metadata repository.
    System Response
    Object 0ASA_P041 of type Process Chain is ignored in further collections. The links for object  of type  are incomplete. This may result in you not being able to activate this object.
    Procedure
    If this error occurs while you are installing BI Content, an error may have occurred during the delivery. Inform SAP. In all other cases, check that the object has not been deleted by another user during collection, for example.
    Please assist,this issue is existing in both Dev as well as Quality enviroment.
    Kind Regards,
    Surbhi

    Hi Surbhi,
    Not sure what might have caused this. Please also try posting the query in BI forums since they might have a better idea on this.
    As a quick workaround you can try to create a copy of the process chain 0ASA_P041 and in the table OPMDM_TYPES for the entries INVOICE and C_INVOICE use this new process chain instead of 0ASA_P041. Then the data management UI will automatically pick the new process chain.
    Thanks,
    Divyesh

  • Invoice Tolerance Tax Issue

    Hi ,
    if a invoice is posted with amount variation and if the variation is within the tolerance limits, then SAP generates two lines to be posted, the first line is the actual amount on PO and the other line contains the difference amount.
    we want to stop applying tax on the second line, and post it to a separate GL account . is that possible , if so how can this funcationality be acheived.
    Maruti.

    That's probably a config issue. You should talk to your business analyst.
    Rob

  • Sales invoice number range issue..

    How to maintain the number range for sales invoice..pls revert

    Go to VOFA look up for the invoice you're using (F1 or F2) in the field "No. range int. assgt." you'll see a number  (example 19), note down that number. Now go to VN01 and look up that number and change it the way you want.
    Edited by: Jeevan Sagar on Sep 25, 2011 6:10 PM

  • Invoice details related issue

    Hi,
    I had a requirement where i need to diaply some fileds in a table basing on some input criteria.
    My requirement is:-
    The fields which will be entered as i/p are
    1.vendor No.
    2.Vendor Name
    3Check adte from
    4.Invoice no.
    5.Check amount.
    6.check name.
    Basing on this i have to display.
    1.check date
    2.check no.
    3.currency
    4.check amount.
    If any one could give me the table names in which this fields will be present.It will be of great help.
    and also the elements of this fields in the table.
    Thanks & regards,
    Lokesh

    Hi Lokesh,
    Please find the details as below:
    Table PAYR:
    Check Amount - RWBTR
    Currency - WAERS
    Check Date - ZALDT or PRIDT (as per your requirement)
    Check Number - CHECT or CHECF
    You find all the above fields in the PAYR table itself.
    Please reward if helpful.
    Regards,
    Sreekanth....
    Edited by: VENKATA SREEKANTH on Jun 19, 2008 1:20 PM

  • Invoice Smartforms NEXT_PAGE Issue

    Hello,
            I have a smartform where I  want only the summary information on the front page and then the line items to appear on all the following pages. Does anyone know how to do this?
            Initially, I defined a very small height on the Main window of the first page to ensure there was not going to be enough space for any items to be printed which would force the smartform to then have to call the next_page where the Main window defined is alot bigger. When I attempt to display the output for the invoice via VF03 no output is displayed. If I make the Main window on the First page bigger, then the items will start to print on the first page.
            How do I make Smartforms only print the items from the 2nd onwards?
    Thanks in advance for any help/suggestions?

    Hi ,
    In the first page create the COMMAND node in the GENERAL ATTRIBUTES  specify  GO to NEW PAGE as your second page .
    From your second page onwards data will be printed as per your requirement ..
    let me know if any concerns

  • MM SUS Invoice unit price issue

    Hello ,
    We are using MM SUS invoice scenario. In MM PO has created for order quantity 2000 EA, and net price is 73.51 USD for 1000 per unit.
    During invoice, price information of item is like this:
    Price 0.07 USD, Per 1 EA and value is 147.02 USD
    But during invoice processing, system calculated net value to 140 USD, and invoice posted for 140 USD only, any advice or suggestion how to handle this in?
    System is SRM4.0 and ECC 6.0
    Thanks in advances for replay.
    Sunil

    Hi Virender,
    Value in SXMB_MONI in SUS is correct.
    <NetUnitPrice>
      <Amount currencyCode="USD">73.51</Amount>
      <BaseQuantity unitCode="MTK">1000</BaseQuantity>
      </NetUnitPrice>
      </Price>
    but in BBAP_PD (table BBP_PDIGP) entry is :
    PRICE                                  0,07
    PRICE_UNIT                       1
    PRICE_ORIGIN
    VALUE                                  147,02
    Normally it  should PRICE 73.51 and PRICE_UNIT 1000 ,any guess we are in SRM4.0?
    Thanks
    Sunil

  • SRM Invoice management: Triggering issue : exception u201C105: suspected duplic

    Dear all,
    We note that IDs fall exception 105 "suspected duplicates" when no other existing ID in the system admits the same characteristics as these.
    1/ T code: /N/OPT/VIM_1CX5
    2/ This group detects a duplicate if Ids were the same:
    -     Date
    -     Company
    -     Amount
    -     Vendor
    -     Invoice reference
    > we care to control that in the type of document posted on the ID, this exception (105 suspected duplicates) is provided
    3/ T code: /N/OPT/VIM_1CX1
    For example, if the type do document is u201C2 Invoices ordering goodsu201D, we note that this exception is well planned
    *so this bug is random.*
    Could you help us to solve it?
    regards,
    Julien

    Hi Julien,
    First of all you are in the wrong forum here. You are talking about SRM Invoice Management in your subject, but you are describing SAP Invoice Management (an add-on by Open Text).
    When the exception for suspected duplicate arisdes it triggers a workitem in someone's inbox. When opening the workitem it shows the invoices for which this could be a duplicate in a list at the bottom of the screen. This should give some insight.
    You describe exception 105 which is for PO related invoices, and normally in the check the PO number is also included but not according to the fields you mention.
    Furthermore your description is not clear at all. Why do you say the bug (up to now I don't see a bug in what you describe) is random?
    Regards,
    Martin

Maybe you are looking for