Invoice not released to accounting: tax code issue

Hi All,
Iam getting an error while i released my invoice to accounting. No accounting document generated. the error is " Tax code V0 does not appear in any G/L account item Message no. FF753"
we have various condition types in our invoices. Only  TAX condition type ZWST has tax code V0. rest of the condition types like basic price, cash dicsount, rebate condition etc do not have tax code assigned to them which is right since only tax conditions have tax code assigned to them and which is ZWST only.
My question is why the above error comes " Tax code V0 does not appear in any G/L account item Message no. FF753" . if I double click on the error message, system shows me the following
""""""""""""""""tax code V0 does not appear in any G/L account item
Message no. FF753
Diagnosis
The document entered contains a customer or vendor item with tax code V0. This does not occur in any of the G/L account or asset items.
Consequences:
If you have not entered the cash discount base manually, the system will set it to zero in this item.
If this item was paid with cash discount deduction and the cash discount amount contains a tax portion, the tax code entered is used for the backdated tax calculation. An automatic breakdown does not take place on the basis of the offsetting items.
Procedure
Check whether the tax code was set correctly. If necessary, correct it or enter "**".
There are, however, also situations in which it makes sense to enter a tax code manually which differs from the offsetting items, for example, during data acquisition.
Effects on Customizing
You can define when this system message is to be issued in accordance with your requirements.
In Customizing, choose Cross-Application Components -> Bank Directory -> Change Message Control.
The application area and message number can be taken from the technical documentation """""""""""""
I do not know what system is saying.Could anybody help.
regards
sachin

Hi Sonu,
Please refer SAP Note 112609.
Thanks & Regards,
Santosh

Similar Messages

  • Accounting entry against Excise invoice not created  for Service Tax sales

    Dear all,
        I am facing one problem related to accounting entry against excise invoice not created, for service tax sales scenario in SEZ plant.
    Accounting entry against billing document is generated,which contains revenue account-Debit entry,service tax 10% --Debit entry,ECS-Service tax 2% --Debit entry, SECess Service Tax 1% --Debit entry & Sundry Debtors (Reco)  - Domestic(Customer receivable reconciallation) account-Credit entry.
      But after generating excise invoice, accouning entries not generated for clearing of Cenvat suspense entry(i.e.service tax 10% ,ECS-Service tax 2% , SECess Service Tax 1%) which is generated during billing document.
    Plz. suggest step by step guideline to resolve this issue.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Mukesh Pardeshi

    Hi ReazuddinMD,
    thanks for your reply and support...I checked all the entries/accounts maintained correct.. but the Accounting entrys against Excise invoice not created..
    Now i am geeting error as below at the time of saving Excise invoice,
    No account is specified in item 0000000001
    Message no. F5670
    Diagnosis
    No account was specified for account type "S" in item "0000000001" of the FI/CO document.
    System Response
    The Financial Accounting program cannot process the document.
    Procedure
    A system error has probably occurred in the application you called up. Check the data transferred to item "0000000001" of the FI/CO document.

  • Invoice Document not released to Accounting -Period was closed

    Hi,
    SD Invoices are not released to Accounting.Those documents are from previous period and also also those periods were already closed.
    Now what should i do? if i want to release the invoice documents which are created in previous periods.Kindly advice me.
    Thanks
    Supriya

    Hi Supriya,
    Please open previous period for posting. Please follow the given below path:-
    SPRO  Financial Accounting  Financial Accounting Global Settings  Document  Posting Periods  Open and Closed Posting Periods
    Here you need to enter Posting Period Variant name assigned to company code and other detail like account number.
    To know the Posting Period Variant follow this path:-
    SPRO  Financial Accounting  Financial Accounting Global Settings  Document  Posting Periods  Assign Variants to Company Code
    Or else you can take help of some FI guy.
    Regards,
    Anand

  • In PO, invoice tab, i have entered tax code, but the screen is not opening

    Hi Friends
    In PO, invoice tab, i have entered tax code, maintained FV11conditions,still i am not able to open the taxes when i click on taxes.
    please note that this is not related to taxinn.
    but in MIRO, the value is calculated & posted correctly.
    Can anyone help me in this.
    Regards
    Pandari

    HI
    Assign the tax code to your comapny code .
    Path
    SPRO- L-G- Tax on goods-basic setting-Determination of excise-condition base -assign tax code to comapny codes.
    Prashant

  • Insufficient Authorization old Invoices Will Not Release to Accounting

    I have some old invoices that will not release to accounting.  Instead of trying to secure a new credit card from the customer how can I remove the credit card information/or trick the order into thinking it doesn't need it so that I can get the open billing documents to the customers open account?
    Please any help will be appreciated.
    Again the error message is insufficient authorization, need to get these documents released to accounting.

    That is true...if it has been partially utilized in another Billing doc, then it wont let delete the lines...
    So when this hapenned to me, this is what i did....and maybe this is not the best practice.
    I first got a Manual authorization in the sales order. Now generally we get the auth. from a 3rd party application Delego. So when we did the manual auth, we just entered a fake Auth number. This way, we tricked the system to let us post the Invoice to accounts. But definitely it posted to the card receivable account insted of the customer account. Now the settlement of this item would fail because the Auth number is not valid but the settlement fails only after it does the additional G/l posting to post to the Clearing account. To clear off this clearing account posting, we created a credit memo for the same amount and again with a fake Auth so now when this credit is processed for settlement, it also fails but reverses the provious debit...so that all accounts are now all balanced out.
    So now remains the customer....so we finally did a Debit memo equal to the original invocie amout and now this posts to the customers account.
    I was unable to find any other solution and was skeptical of doing any enhancement or changes just for a single case. Pls also let me know if you come across any better ideas.

  • Billing Document not released to Accounting -Issue

    Hi,
    While releasing the billing document,it is not releasing to accounting and giving the below error log.
    Thanks
    Supriya

    Diagnosis
        When condition "ZSCM" (application "V") was transferred to the value field "VV139" in operating concern "AFCO" in Profitability Analysis, the following became apparent:
    u2022     The condition can take both positive and negative   values
    u2022     The flag "Transfer values with +/- signs" has not be set in Customizing for value field assignment.
        Inconsistencies in the data could occur as a consequence.
    System Response
        It is not possible to post the document in Profitability Analysis.
    Procedure
        Set the flag "Transfer values with +/- signs" for the condition "ZSCM".
        You should set the flag "Transfer values with +/- signs"  selectively for individual conditions if:
    1.  The conditions can take both negative and positive values (for example, in the case of conditions that describe a transfer price surcharge or a loss deduction).
    2.  The conditions appear several times in a billing document and thus cause a debit posting as well as a
        credit posting (this is the case, for example, when creating or cancelling reserves).
    By activating the flag "Transfer values with +/- signs", you balance the positive and negative values in a
    condition. You can thereby guarantee that the sum of the negative and positive condition values is displayed as the correct total value in the value field assigned to the condition.
    Caution when in the production system!
        If you have already used condition "ZSCM" to post data in the production system, then the sign in
        Profitability Analysis may differ from the previous sign as a result of the flag "Transfer values with +/-
        signs" having been activated. See the F1 Help documentation on the field "Transfer values with +/-
        signs" or the OSS note 52849. If deviating signs occur, it makes sense to move condition "ZSCM" to a new value field! Contact your system adviser or SAP.
        The +/- signs are handled as follows for the flag "Transfer values with +/- signs":
        Billing document (normal) "trans.with signs"  "trans.w/o signs"
         Debit posting                   negative     positive       (such as sales deductions)
         Credit posting                  positive      positive       (such as revenues)
        Credit memos/returns    "trans.with signs"  "trans.w/o signs"
         Debit posting                   negative     negative       (such as revenues)
         Credit posting                  positive       negative       (such as sales deductions)
        Maintain Condition Assignment to Value Fields u2013 SD Condition
        Maintain Condition Assignment to Value Fields u2013 MM condition
    Procedure for System Administration
    Thanks
    Supriya

  • Billing documents should not be created when it is not released to accounti

    Hi SD gurus,
    In some situation, billing documents are generated but it is not released to accounting which results in mismatch between FI value and SD value. We go to VFX3 and see the list of billing documents and take corrective action.
    Our requirement is that the billing document should not be generated when system is not releasing this billing document to accounting.
    Please suggest a solution for this.
    Regards,
    Senthil.

    Thanks giri.
    For the following reasons, the billing documents are not released to accounting.
    1. If the user wrongly chosen the billing type for the delivery.
    2. After creating condition type, it has to be assigned in COPA. If we forgot to do it, billing doc will not released.
    Our requirement is that if the billing document is not able create accounting document, the billing document itself should not be generated.
    Hope this will be suffice to understand my issue and suggest a suitable solution.
    Points will be rewarded.
    Regards,
    Kumar.

  • Table for Invoices not release

    Is there any table to find the list of invoices which are not released for accounting
    if yes please let me know
    Regards,
    KK

    Hi,
    I think you could check table VBRK for the field: RFBSK(Status for transfer to accounting).
    The different value of this field means like following:
         Error in Accounting Interface
    A     Billing document blocked for forwarding to FI
    B     Posting document not created (account determ.error)
    C     Posting document has been created
    D     Billing document is not relevant for accounting
    E     Billing Document Canceled
    F     Posting document not created (pricing error)
    G     Posting document not created (export data missing)
    H     Posted via invoice list
    I     Posted via invoice list (account determination error)
    Regards,
    Alex

  • Output to be blocked for Billing documents, if not released to Accounting

    Hi SAP Gurus,
    We have a requirement, where the Billing documents should not be issued output, if they are not released to accounting.
    The system should not allow the user to issue output for billing documents, if not released to accounting.
    Regards,
    sree.

    Standard routine 62 should be able to suffice your requirement.
    Provided output determination in billing doc should happen from output condition record (VV31).
    If you manaully assign assign output type in billing doc, then system will overlook the requirement.
    In addition to that if your output type is assigned with requiremrnt routine 62 in your output procedure.
    Then till your release tke billing doc to accounting, you will not be able see output type determine in billing doc.
    If you have doubt, whether the output type is getting determined properly or not.
    Then output(header/item) screen in your billing doc(VF02), in menubar select Goto - then choose  Determin. Analysis.
    It will show message that due requirement 62, output determination didn't too place.
    Regards
    JP

  • Billing Document Not releasing to Accounting because of Condition Type

    Hi,
    We have used Sales Condition Type ZSCM(Which is a statistical condition type) in Billing Documents and they are already released to Accounting.Today we have created one more Billing Document with same Condition type ZSCM.But this billing document is not getting released to Accounting?
    What could be the reason? Why it was released to Accounting before with the same condition type ZSCM and why it is not getting released to Accounting this time.
    I am breaking my head to find the possible reasons...kindly help me out to find the problem.
    1.Billing document 90005889 - has value 64.48462- and It has only 2 Items and it was released to accounting
    2.Billing document 90005729 - has value 217.87960- and It has only 21 Items and it was not released to accounting and asking to activate +/- sing in KE4I transaction for the ZSCM condition type.
    Why billing document 90005889 is  released for accounting and why 90005729 was not released to accounting?
    Thanks
    Supriya

    Hi,
    There can be following possible reasons fo the samed :
    1. If the specific GL account is not getting any assignment to CO object.
    2. Also you need to check assignment with VKOA that whichever GL is assigned as per business process of Sales (the account which is going to be credited) and all relevant settings in VKOA.
    3. Pls check all substitutions and validations if any connected with that condition type and GL. Becuase sometimes it may happen that because of calling some other application (for ex. Set or substitution as generally transportation of this element happen with entire hierarchy if you add your substition in the node.) at he time of posting of billing document. This has already happen with our business scenario.
    4. Also check if this sales revenue GL is assinged to any set and if that set is called through any substitution ot validation.
    Pls check all these possibilities and revert.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Taral Patel

  • ReleaseRequest failed with error code 0x80004005 \ Task Sequence Manager could not release active TS request. code 80004005

    Hi All,
    I am trying to deploy an OS but the deployment is failing part way through. I have searched the logs and identified the error: Task Sequence Manager could not release active TS request. code 80004005
    If anyone could assist with this is would be much appreciated.
    Many thanks
    Logs below:
    <![LOG[Unlocked ActualConfig successfully]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.273+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="0" thread="1752" file="policyutil.cpp:7898">
    <![LOG[Unlocked policy transaction lock successfully]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.273+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="0" thread="1752" file="policyutil.cpp:7904">
    <![LOG[Raising event:
    instance of CCM_PolicyAgent_SettingsEvaluationComplete
    ClientID = "GUID:8388E2E2-7642-4436-88D0-FC9335F6D56E";
    DateTime = "20141218122103.273000+000";
    PolicyNamespace = "\\\\wst0339\\root\\ccm\\policy\\machine\\actualconfig";
    ProcessID = 1748;
    ThreadID = 1752;
    ]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.273+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="event.cpp:729">
    <![LOG[Successfully submitted event to the Status Agent.]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.273+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="0" thread="1752" file="event.cpp:747">
    <![LOG[End TS policy evaluation]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.273+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="policyutil.cpp:10580">
    <![LOG[Policy evaluation initiated]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.273+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="utils.cpp:3387">
    <![LOG[Sending success status message]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.273+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="tsmanager.cpp:659">
    <![LOG[MP server http://LONSVR0150.uk.ham.local. Ports 80,443. CRL=false.]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.273+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="utils.cpp:4855">
    <![LOG[Setting authenticator]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.288+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="utils.cpp:4877">
    <![LOG[Set authenticator in transport]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.288+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="libsmsmessaging.cpp:7592">
    <![LOG[Sending StatusMessage]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.304+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="libsmsmessaging.cpp:4020">
    <![LOG[Setting message signatures.]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.320+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="0" thread="1752" file="libsmsmessaging.cpp:1292">
    <![LOG[Setting the authenticator.]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.320+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="0" thread="1752" file="libsmsmessaging.cpp:1322">
    <![LOG[CLibSMSMessageWinHttpTransport::Send: URL: LONSVR0150.uk.ham.local:80  CCM_POST /ccm_system/request]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.320+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1"
    thread="1752" file="libsmsmessaging.cpp:8422">
    <![LOG[Request was succesful.]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.351+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="0" thread="1752" file="libsmsmessaging.cpp:8758">
    <![LOG[Finalize logging request ignored from process 1748]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.351+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="tslogging.cpp:1737">
    <![LOG[Waiting for CcmExec service to be fully operational]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.351+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="utils.cpp:4019">
    <![LOG[CcmExec service is up and fully operational]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.351+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="utils.cpp:4024">
    <![LOG[Access handle will be read from _SMSTSActiveRequestHandle]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.351+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="tsmanagerutils.cpp:99">
    <![LOG[Access handle: {9F9B91DA-055D-4B32-9817-52C369835080}]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.351+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="tsmanagerutils.cpp:111">
    <![LOG[Attempting to release request using {9F9B91DA-055D-4B32-9817-52C369835080}]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.351+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752"
    file="tsmanagerutils.cpp:118">
    <![LOG[CoCreateInstance succeeded]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.382+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="tsmanagerutils.cpp:133">
    <![LOG[pISoftwareExecutionRequestMgr->ReleaseRequest(ActiveRequestGUID), HRESULT=80004005 (e:\nts_sccm_release\sms\client\tasksequence\tsmanager\tsmanagerutils.cpp,136)]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.382+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager"
    context="" type="0" thread="1752" file="tsmanagerutils.cpp:136">
    <![LOG[ReleaseRequest failed with error code 0x80004005]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.382+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="3" thread="1752" file="tsmanagerutils.cpp:136">
    <![LOG[Task Sequence Manager could not release active TS request. code 80004005]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.382+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="2" thread="1752"
    file="tsmanagerutils.cpp:165">
    <![LOG[Process completed with exit code 0]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.413+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSMBootstrap" context="" type="1" thread="1728" file="commandline.cpp:1098">
    <![LOG[Exiting with return code 0x00000000]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.413+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSMBootstrap" context="" type="1" thread="1728" file="tsmbootstrap.cpp:1032">
    <![LOG[Process completed with exit code 0]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.413+00" date="12-18-2014" component="OSDSetupHook" context="" type="1" thread="788" file="commandline.cpp:1098">
    <![LOG[Task sequence completed 0x00000000]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.413+00" date="12-18-2014" component="OSDSetupHook" context="" type="1" thread="788" file="basesetuphook.cpp:1384">
    <![LOG[Uninstalling Setup Hook]LOG]!><time="12:21:06.552+00" date="12-18-2014" component="OSDSetupHook" context="" type="1" thread="788" file="basesetuphook.cpp:1427">
    <![LOG[Removing setup hook from registry.]LOG]!><time="12:21:06.552+00" date="12-18-2014" component="OSDSetupHook" context="" type="0" thread="788" file="vistasetuphook.cpp:143">
    <![LOG[Successfully removed C:\WINDOWS\system32\OSDGINA.DLL]LOG]!><time="12:21:06.552+00" date="12-18-2014" component="OSDSetupHook" context="" type="1" thread="788" file="basesetuphook.cpp:1183">
    <![LOG[Successfully removed C:\WINDOWS\system32\OSDSETUPHOOK.EXE]LOG]!><time="12:21:06.552+00" date="12-18-2014" component="OSDSetupHook" context="" type="1" thread="788" file="basesetuphook.cpp:1183">
    <![LOG[Successfully removed C:\WINDOWS\system32\_SMSOSDSetup]LOG]!><time="12:21:06.552+00" date="12-18-2014" component="OSDSetupHook" context="" type="1" thread="788" file="basesetuphook.cpp:1220">

    4005 can mean a few things,  Some common can be  The wrong BIOS time,  or a a bad Hard drive.   look at those two first. 

  • While doing invoice verification, for fright value tax code not appearing

    Hi All,
    While doing invoice verification for PO which is having fright conditon, system is not displaying tax code in invoice.
    Every time user has to select manually in the invoive verification.
    Is there is any config missing for that fright condition?
    Thanks in Advance.
    Anil

    Hi
    If you wish to default the tax code for the planned delivery costs this                                         
    must be obtained from an independent source which is OMR2.                                                      
    With OMR2 it is possible to default the tax in the delivery cost                                                
    line + header tax. It is not possible to default only in the delivery                                           
    cost line. The header tax needs to be changed manually to support the                                           
    different tax codes in the item lines.                                                                          
    Best regards
    Erika

  • Non Dedutable tax code issue

    Hi Gurus,
    I have one issue, User Created PO with non dedutable tax code and Did GR and while doing IR
    Invoice Account Details
    Posting        Accounting        G/L Code             Act/ mat/Ven             Amount
    1                   K                        220000               Vendor code               5050.02-
    2                   S                        230000                GR/IR Clearing Acc     4449.39
    3                   M                        110950               Material code               600.66
    Issue is tax amount is 600.66, Why it is posting Accounting Key M as this is non dedutable tax code, so as per my understanding
    System shoud post 600.66 to GR/IR clearing account, so why it is posting to M.
    Please suggest where it is went wrong?
    Anil

    hi,
    as in your case you are not availing the cenvat credit, instead you are loading the same on the inventory as you could not avail it.hence the system has loaded the cenvat credit on the material that why you are getting sepearte line item in the accounting doc.
    in the tax procedure you would have assign NVV accounting key against the condition type. you define the details of NVV in OBCN trx where you would have mentioned as seperate line item(2) against the posting indicator. if you have maintained (3) against the posting indicator then it would distribute the expense /revenue item.i.e nothing but your GR/IR account
    Regards,
    velu

  • Calculation of Tax Issue from FB60 (Tax Code Issue)

    Dear All,
    Normally when we purchase or received any services we post following entry.
    INVOICE VALUE IS 1000
    Purchase Ac Dr   1000
       To Vendor                   900
       T o Tax                         100
    But our requirement is that
    Purchase Ac Dr   1100
       To Vendor                  1000
       T o Tax                          100
    System should add cost of TAX  in purchase instead of reduction form vendor balance as we have to give 1000 RS to vendor.
    Can we create TAX code in this manner.
    This is not even possible form function available in Edit Option in FB60 (Calculate tax on Net Amount)
    Not even from TDS (Withholding tax)
    WE CANu2019T SUGGEST POSTING JV IN THAT CASE.
    Regards,
    Bittu

    Apologized for that Atif.
    Withholding Tax Type does not control Vendor line item.
    My issue is that system should not reduce value enter in vendor  amount field.
    System usually reduce amount which is payable to vendor
    Please see my example once again. I also mention that it is not working from Withholding Tax nor form Tax code(FTXP)
    Edit option in FB60 is also not useful in this case.
    Regards,

  • Change the tax code issue in fs00

    Dear Sapgurus,
    in production i create one g/l code user id : mydr123 T code is fs00 g/l code number 300000 account name is sales, account group is p&l and account currency inr, tax category ">" , now i am going to change tax category * while saving the g/l system is not accepted  itsshowing error message "     1) Changing the tax code not possible; account has a balance
    2) The data contains error, you cannot save, but if i choose"-" its accepted please tell me
    Regards
    Myfriend

    Hello MyFriend,
    If you wish to make a direct posting to a tax account you must have
    the gl account active in transaction MIRO.
    Please review the online documenation located via help -> sap
    library -> materials management -> logistics invoice verification ->
    Direct postings -> direct posting to gl account
    here you can see the setttings for same in customizing are
    Setting in Customizing for Logistics Invoice Verification
    As per error message FH081, it arises only if the account had perviously
    the tax category ">" or "<". They cannot be changed anymore
    if the account has a balance. The tax categories "-", "+", "*" etc.,
    can be changed, you will get in FS02 only the warning FH011.
    Please check GL account xxxxxx with FBL3N, to see if there is a balance
    still left. To make the account balance zero, you might try transaction
    FB41, this allows you to post directly a balance to the Tax gl account
    even when the flag "Post to automatically" is set.
    I hope this helps
    Regards
    Ray

Maybe you are looking for