IPlanet file size settings
I am unable to upload file having size more than 1 MB
Is there any file size settings in iPlanet server with which we can upload more than 1 Mb file
Hi Mansi,
It is not because of App server. It is due to the program/logic that you are using. There is one very good file upload application is available in open source where you can upload the attachments of 10mb within very less time.
Download the jar from the following URL
http://servlets.com/cos/
Regards,
Sandeep
Similar Messages
-
Having trouble reducing PDF file size on export
Hi, I recently switched from Quark to InDesign and am having trouble figuring out how to reduce the size of a PDF on export.
The file has about 200 pages with about 300 EPS files, which are approximately 30-40K each. The file uses fewer than 10 fonts, all from two font families (Bembo Std and Univers Std). When I created a similar file in Quark, the exported PDF is ~5MG. However, when I export the file I created in InDesign, the PDF is 10xs larger (~50MG). I tried exporting using the High Quality Print and Smallest File Size settings, but the result was the same. (I think that is because there are no JPG images to compress, just vector files which are already tiny.)
If you have any suggestions for other settings to check, I would be grateful for the help. Overall, other than this issue, I have been extremely happy with InDesign.
I am using CS5, v 7.0.4 on Mac OS X (10.6.8, Snow Leopard)
Thank you,
SHQuark to the best of my knowledge still goes the Postscript to PDF route - I'm not 100% sure on that.
But here's why Export is differetn than how you print to Postscript and distill http://indesignsecrets.com/creating-pdf-export-or-use-distiller.php
Distilling is very much frowned upon, and Export from InDesign is considered the best workflow.And the file size is larger, but it does add a lot of important information to the PDF, which makes it superior than distilling.
But, there's a lot of document overhead in PDFs.
The High Quality setting is only meant as a guide. It's not meant to be used, in my opinion, out of the box.
This explains why and how to counter it.
http://indesignsecrets.com/document-overhead-in-indesigns-pdf-can-be-huuuuuuge.php
The Help files do give some clues
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/InDesign/6.0/WSa285fff53dea4f8617383751001ea8cb3f-70b3a.html
This PDF guide is MUST http://www.adobe.com/designcenter/cs3/articles/cs3_printguide.html
And besides that EPS files are considered legacy files by Adobe, I'm not sure how they're handled on PDF export. But you'd be better off saving to .ai from illustrator from now on.
http://www.prepressure.com/library/file-formats/eps
Instead of EPS from photoshop - save as TIFF or PSD if all Raster. If it's raster + vector text layers, shapes or masks then save to PDF.
http://indesignsecrets.com/preserving-vectors-in-photoshop-files.php -
I'm pretty new to Motion, so bear with me. When I export to mov, the video file I end up with in enormous, and my computer won't even play it without stalling. I'm sure I could use a better graphics card, but I have a MacBook Pro and usually it does fine with high def video files.
For instance, I'm working in 1080p, and I have a file that is 10GB for about 4 minutes of video (no audio).
Even making a simple text video, the file size is bigger than it should be. I have a 10 second video that consists of 1 image and a simple text effect and it's close to 150 MB. The movies are projected on large surfaces so I do need high def; I've seen many high def movies that are much smaller than this.
Are there any compression or file size settings, without buying Compressor? I'm not expecting much - I know actually buying Compressor would give me more options - but files this size aren't even useable.
Thanks.You can select the codec you want during the export process. Share>Export Movie (or command e). In the screen shot below, I have a 1080p h.264 clip in a Motion project. My export choices for codec are in the drop down menu and what I choose depends on what I'm ultimately going to do with it. For example, if I needed to preserve an alpha channel, I would choose Pro Res 4444. (Which, incidentally, produces a 10 second video that's nearly 400 MB. If I instead chose the highly compressed H.264, the same ten second video is only 19 MB.)
Good luck.
Russ -
In Adobe Pro XI when converting an excel file to a pdf, the pdf is not retaining the page size settings. Has anyone found a fix for this?
It shouldn't print each page as a separate job and
each tab has a different name, so, even if it did, it
ought to give the printouts the name of the tabs.
It doesn't print each page as a separate job unless the orientation is different - that's the bug. And the name of the job is taken from the name of the window, not the name of the tabs. That's how every application works, which, I think, is why Excel allows the specific selection or the active sheets to be printed.
Still, that does sound like a plausible explanation.
However, even if presented with multiple prints with
the same name, the spooler should print each one!
The spooler does print each one - you can watch the spooler process the multiple jobs. I think, though, that they are being overwritten since all the jobs have the name of the window as the job title. And since this happens after the Save Dialog is presented, there's really nothing the application can do. To Excel, it's one job, the multiple orientations don't matter; it's just that Apple doesn't handle it correctly.
As a workaround, you can print the selections one at a time and give them unique names and then rejoin them in one PDF file. -
I opened a .psd file (300 ppi, CMYK, .jpgs (1626px x 2130px), I saved it as a jpg (None, 12, base "standard", preview checked).
I then closed the original .psd file.
I repeated those steps on the same file and saved a series of 6 .jpgs.
Of those 6 files, I received 2 large files (6.2MB) and 4 smaller (3.2MB) files.
My coworkers who were having trouble opening some of my jpg images in Windows Photo Gallery on Vista OS were able to open the smaller files but not the larger ones.
Do you have any idea why the same settings would give me different file sizes from CS5?
Is there a way I can make it consistently keep the smaller more compatible version?How well a image data compresses depends on image content. Image with High detail do not compress well image will little detail will compress well and the file size will be small. Compare a image of a blank white wall to a wall with a black and white checker board wall paper. One is all white it white no other detail to detail the other has squares that vary in size because of perspective angle and distance a lot of detail must be recorded.
I do not know why they can not open some of your images. File size should not be an issue. All your image decoded are the same size Width number of Pixels Height numbers of pixels background layer only for these are jpeg files. -
Can you change X Pro default settings to save all PDFs using "smallest file size" job option?
Is there a way to change Acrobat X Pro's default PDF Save settings to use the settings in Distiller's "smallest file size" job options, or adjust Acrobat's default save settings to a close match?
In Windows you select the printer in the Start>Printers menu and right click to get the properites. You can then go to the settings tab and select the smallest file size job options. When you do it in the printer settings, you have set the default. Be very careful with this choice. It typically reduces the image resolution and embeds no fonts. If you are not distributing the file, then probably not an issue. However, with distribution you risk many folks not being able to read the PDF because of strange characters and low-res image.
-
Best Compression Settings for Reduced File Sizes
I've been compressing MP4s and trying to improve the video file size but I'm surprised that Adobe Media Encoder is creating larger file sizes despite reducing the dimensions and audio quality. I've tried MP4 and FLV export settings. Does anyone have any recommendations?
Hi(Bonjour)!
See this link:
http://www.kenstone.net/fcphomepage/qt_movies_fromfcp.html
Michel Boissonneault -
What's the best settings to Export movie for smaller file sizes?
Hi, I've been working on some helmet cam footage which was taken with Xvidmpeg4.avi and was advised to convert it to dvavi for editing in PrE, this created a huge file to work with, the original footage was 206mb and the finished edited dvavi file is now 1.56gb, what settings can I use to export the movie with a much smaller file size, but hopefully try to retain some quality, to upload to places like Vimeo? I thought I would try to export it in the same as the original footage Xvidmpeg4.avi thinking this might compress it again to something like the 206mb of the original and the original was good quality footage, but PrE just hangs up with a box stating 'Xvid Status (Not Responding)' and when I try to cancel that the whole thing crashes and closes? So when I go to File > Export > Movie, what would be the best settings in:
General > File Type ?
Video > Compressor
lots of options under compressor if I select the file type as Microsoft AVI, so I'm guessing something under that would compress it to a smaller file size but what, I could spend all night trying different settings so hoping for some advice?
Or, if I'm completely in the wrong place for the settings and should be doing something else please tell me?
Thanks, GavThanks for the replies, but to me it's still confusing - simply because there are so many settings, if I go to Share/Personal Computer I'm then presented with a whole load of settings
NTSC Flash Video
MPEG
DVAVI
Windows Media
QuickTime
and under each of those is a lot more advanced settings?
I'm guessing I wouldn't use flash or quicktime, so which of the others would I use and what are the advanced settings to use as I can't find anything that is .wmv or .mov
What I've done with other videos that I've exported from PrE as dvavi is then to put it through Windows Movie Maker, Publish Movie, This Computer, then put the settings to Windows Media DVD Quality (PAL) (3.0 Mps) - this seemed to be the only setting that reduced the file size considerably but still had good quality, but it's still about twice the original file size?
This all seems long winded to me, open original file, convert original file, output another file, then output the file again in something else which then results in loss of quality and a larger file than the original? I'm ending up with lots of files, was hoping just to edit in Premiere then export/publish that edited clip and that would be it, then upload to the net.
Is it not possible to just edit my original footage and save it, just like you would with something like a word document, should I be using something else and not Premiere?
Thanks. -
When using the Save Layer Comps to PDF Script, can you change the PDF settings. I need both Smallest File Size and Press Quality? Thanks in advance to the group for assisting with this matter.
— JohnNo, there isn't. The way you're using the file is not recommended. You
should use a review tracker to avoid getting in the way of one another. -
With Premiere Elements 11, when Publish/Share (saving) a finished video, selecting H.264 .mov file type, what are the recommended Aspect and Codec settings , for a crisp video with a small file size?
Gary Krouse
We will customize a very detailed reply, but
(a) What are the properties of your source media?
(b) What did you or the program set as the project preset to match the properties of the source media?
(c) What specific requirements do you have for this H.264.mov export file?
File size can be a compromise between bitrate, file size, and quality.
Thanks.
ATR -
Image Processor quality settings / file sizes
Hello,
I have been searching around and am coming up empty handed, looking to find out how to get large images (fullscreen web slideshow, would like the images to be 1024 pixels wide or bigger), and maintain quality, yet not be over 700K. Here is an amazing example - http://lambertgroupproductions.com/canyon/zoominoutsliderswp/images/opportuneFullScreen/05 _opportune_full.jpg - 2500 pixels wide, looks GREAT, and is 248K. Any idea how this is being done?? I've tried everything with Bridge and PS, and even looked at other programs to help reduce the file size without harming the quality too much. What I'm running into is one of two problems - the file looks great but is way too big, or - the file size is okay, but the jpeg quality is so low, it's very grainy / blurry! Even with fast internet connections now, I'd still rather have the photos look good and not force the users to wait more than a few seconds to get all the photos to load.
Any help is much appreciated!
TrevorIn Photoshop use the option to Save For Web (Photoshop / File / Save for Web).
Inhere experiment with the settings. I made a sample I set to 2500 pix wide, bicubic sharper, jpeg Low and Quality 10. The saved file only had a size of 450 kb.
I can't show that sample here in 2500 pix because this site only accepts 450 pix wide images to insert but this file here demonstrates a bit more what I mean. I have set this in SFW at 450 pix wide and low jpeg 10. The result is a file of only about 20 kb in size, not suitable for enlargement but just to show you their is still a bit of quality while only 20 kb of file size:
When setting jpeg High and quality 60 in SFW you end up with around 100 kb and a very nice quality. If you want to check the 2500 pixels edition (size of around 450 kb, and looking very good) you have to download it yourself using this link:
http://we.tl/q7UQP0cXeC
(send via We Transfer, a free upload and download service). It will be available until 26 may 2013 before it is automatically deleted from their servers. Or drop me a private message so I can mail it to you personally -
in the metadata settings i can find the file size in pix. is it possible to see the size in inches?
Yes, that is one way to do it. But you can also do it by doing some simple math. For instance, let's say the you have an image that is 4000 x 6000 pixels. It doesn't matter whether resolution setting is in the file. The image is still 4000 x 6000 pixels. But you can decide what resolution you are going to export your copy. And you would do that for its intended purpose. If you are going for a high quality print then you would probably want 300 PPI in your export settings. With the example I've given the size print you can get had 300 PPI would be as follows:
4000 (pixels) / 300 (PPI) = 13.333 Inches
6000 (pixels) / 300 (PPI) = 20 inches
So if you were really precise in needing a 300 PPI print you can get one that is 13 x 20".
If you are preparing for display on the screen, the higher resolution isn't needed. Using the same math:
4000 / 72 = 55.55 inches
6000 / 72 = 83.33 inches
By doing some simple math in your head you can determine the resolution that you need and the size that you need and set up your export accordingly.
Technically speaking a digital image doesn't have a size other than pixel dimensions. Everything else has to be determined by the resolution that you need for the intended purpose of the final image. -
Whcih codec/settings for best quality, smallest file size?
Hi,
This is probably a really frequently asked question, and I apologise for that.
I've been searching for an answer and the only information I can hastily find is at last a year old, some stuff dating from 2008
Forgive me - even though I'm studying media, I have no idea about codecs or the best ratio to use or anything.
Basically, I need some advice over which settings to use on my video. The work needs to be a really high quality, as it will be displayed on a projection screen for an exhibition, but I'm sending it over the internet, so I need a compromise between file size and quality.
One of my tutors has told me that I should always be using the ProRes 422 codec, but when I use that, and export the video in 1080p, it comes out at 3.5GB which is just ridiculous.
It has to be sent off ASAP, as the exhibition is on the 21st.
If anyone has any advice to me, that would be amazing.
Thank you in advance.Hi, thank you so much for your reply.
It's a college project, and the person we were working with is a Doctor in sound. We had to record environmental sounds and create soundscapes for them. As media students though, we were told to make animations, or videos to accompany them. My video is just some of my photography, with some titles, and an AIF music file. Sound is his thing - he wouldn't know what settings I should use.
The project is in 1080p 25 frame. I asked my one of my tutors, and he told me I was right in exporting it as ProRes 422. I used the Adobe Media Encoder and the youtube setting, which has taken a copy of the file down to 177.5MB and I'm burning a copy of the 3.5GB one on to disk in hopes I can get it there somehow.
It's all a bit vague to be honest. My friend's project is 1080p. I'm pretty sure it's the standard size we use for all our projects. The projectors should be set up to handle it. -
Export Settings for best quality, smaller file size?
I have a one hour movie I made of a concert and exported it using Share --> Media Browser --> 720p. It came out great quality but it's 4.4gb's.
I need to figure out how to get that down to about 1GB while keeping 720p. HD movies in iTunes are two plus hours and only 3gb's from what I've seen. How can I use the same compression settings? There has to be a way to compress it a little more, while staying in 720p right?
What am I missing? TIA!Compression quality really depends on the type of video that you are trying to compress. If the video is full of motion and noise, it will be very hard to reduce the file size through compression without massive loss. Compression is a trade-off. If you reduce the fame size to 480p, you may increase the quality of the video while reducing the file size versus trying to do the same thing at 720p.
-
Shedding light on export settings and file size
I am trying to learn about exporting images and file size. I have a combination of RAW and JPEG images in my library. For the sake of this discussion, I am going to limit this to JPEG's. I need to export my images, so that I can then upload them to an external photo processing site like Kodak.com. I was going to export versions of my images because I have made adjustments to many of them. I was going to choose the top level preset of "JPEG - original size." For the sake of example, the file that I try exporting this way has a file size (in Aperture) of 1.94 MB. After exporting it (with a DPI of 72) and a color profile of sRGB IEC61966-2.1 (I am not sure what the significance of the DPI and color profiles are either), I get an exported image with a file size of 4.6 MB. When I export the master image, I get a file size of 2.0 MB. I'm completely confused and at a loss as to what is going on here.
Can someone please shed some light on how to go about exporting images so that I can be certain that I am exporting the best quality image possible.
Also, and possibly more importantly, I export image files to sites like MobileMe Galler, Flikr and Phanfare, etc, for the purpose of archiving my images and now I am not sure if the files I am exporting are of the optimal most quality they can be. Do these settings have any bearing on the images that are being sent to my archival folders?
Thanks in advance for any input on this important topic.
MacThis confusion is because of the way Jpg files handle data. Jpg is a kind of file that compresses data to achieve a balance between image quality and file size. The jpg file that your camera saves to disk is also compressed, that's why the difference in size between a 2 MB jpg and the same image in Raw is for example 18 MB.
Jpg is a lossy compression format, every time you save a jpg some compression is applied, say after editing in Photoshop. Aperture must be reading your jpg masters to export jpg files to disk, so the difference in size should be the compression quantity applied to the newly created jpg file. I could have a 1 MB jpg file previously compressed with a quality level of 7, but if I export it at a compression quality of 10, the file could easily become a 2 MB file. The problem is quality doesn't increase with file size when the original file is a jpg.
Also some files include a preview image inside the file, increasing the final file size. The color profile embedded should't increase size by much, since most camera jpg files already include a color profile embedded (color profiles tells computers to display color consistently between applications and peripherals like printers. sRGB is widely used for images published on Internet).
As for the images you are sending to the archival folder, I would suggest you to export the masters, instead of exporting a new jpg file from an already compressed jpg master.
I know this is a complex subject so I hope I haven't confused you.
Maybe you are looking for
-
How do I export the pdf data from multiple forms to an excel spreadsheet?
I have several forms that one of my employees collects data in. I need that data from those forms to go to a spreadsheet for analyzation purposes. I am using Acrobat XI.
-
How to display datetime like below
How to display datetime like below 13-oct-2014 10:11:00 2014-10-13 10:11:00 (I always must display seconds as 00) format is dd-mmm-yyyy hh:mm:00 yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:00
-
Oracle 10.2.0.4 cannot find sdo_georaster
Hello, I got a machine (installed by others), when I tried to create sdo_georaster object: SQL> create table t1(id number, img mdsys.sdo_georaster); create table t1(id number, img mdsys.sdo_georaster) ERROR at line 1: ORA-00902: invalid datatype 1. S
-
I am running a pix 501 ver 6.1 with tacacs 3.0 server runninfg on a NT box. I have all the user authenticated via tacacs going inbound and outbound and have setup accounting as well. I would like to find a EASY way to compile a report to find out wha
-
Reuest | New FORUM on ADOBE PORTFOLIO
Best regards I would like to see a dedicated forum on Adobe Portfolio in Acrobat CS4. Turtle Heart Ojibway Artist