Is Enterprise 6.2.1 compatible with Win2003

Hello everyone,
We need to upgrade our servers to Win2003, right now we are running Hyperion Enterprise version 6.2.1.
Is this version compatible with Win2003?
Thanks in advance

Yes it is. Following version are supported for TT 11.2.1.8.x releases
■ Oracle 11g Release 2
■ Oracle 11g Release 1
■ Oracle 10g Release 2 (10.2.0.4.0 or above)

Similar Messages

10.1.3.3 patch set 3 compatible with Win2003 server?

Oracle® Application Server Patch Set Notes
10g Release 3 (10.1.3) Patch Set 3 (10.1.3.3.0) for Linux and Microsoft Windows
Is this compatible/certified for both Windows XP and Windows 2003 server? My dba/sysadmin wants to know this before we even install.

Hi,
First, yes it is certified, see [http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/ias/files/oracle_soa_certification_r3_10.1.3_matrix.xls] for all certification information. But i would install 10.1.3.4 right away instead of installing 10.1.3.3. It has a lot of bug fixes in it.
Kind Regards,
Andre

I need Ralink Motorola BC8 Bluetooth 3.0+HS Adapter(or Any other Bluetooth driver which is compatible with HP Pavilion DV6-6119tx) for Windows 8 Enterprise 64 bit.

It is my humble request to help me about below issue:
I have HP PAVILION DV6-6119tx Notebook PC with Windows 7 ultimate 64 bit but
now I have upgrade to Windwos 8 Enterprise 64 bit than my Ralink Motorola BC8 Bluetooth 3.0+HS Adapter did not work in Windows 8 Enterprise 64 bit.
I have tried many times with difference way to fix this problem but
still I am unable to get it. So please help me to solve my problem.
I really need Compatible Bluetooth driver for my Notebook PC to run on Windows 8 Enterprise 64 bit.
(or Any other Bluetooth driver which is compatible with HP Pavilion DV6-6119tx to run on Windows 8 64 bit)

Hi,
Did you mean this version?
Ralink Motorola BC8 Bluetooth HS Adapter
Version 3
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/compatibility/CompatCenter/ProductDetailsViewer?Type=Software&Name=Ralink+Motorola+BC8+Bluetooth+HS+Adapter&ModelOrVersion=3&Vendor=Motorola&Locale=1031%2C1033%2C1042%2C1043%2C1046%2C2057%2C3081%2C4105%2C16393&LastSearchTerm=Ralink%2BMotorola%2BBluetooth%2B%252bHS%2B%2BAdapter%2B&BreadcrumbPath=Ralink+Motorola+Bluetooth+%2BHS++Adapter+&TempOsid=Windows+8
According to this site, this version of Bluetooth adapter is compatible with Windows 8, so it's related to driver. Please try to remove the driver in device manager and restart the computer to reinstall to see what's going on.
Download this driver and install this in compatible mode:
http://h20565.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.PAGE/public/psi/swdDetails/?lang=en&cc=US&swItem=ob_92786_1
To known if this issue is caused by failing to load driver, i suggest we disable fast boot to check the results:
How to Turn "Fast Startup" On or Off for a Hybrid Boot in Windows 8 and 8.1
http://www.eightforums.com/tutorials/6320-fast-startup-turn-off-windows-8-a.html
For further help, please upload the event log here for research.
Please understand that if we finally fail to get this done, we have to wait for the driver update from manufacturer.
Kate Li
TechNet Community Support

Continuity Not Compatible with Enterprise Networks?

I upgraded my MBP (15" Retina) to OS X Yosemite today in the hopes of gaining access to the continuity/handoff features. However, after checking all my settings on all my devices, I cannot manage to use the feature.
On my MacBook
-I have enabled Handoff in the General Settings
-I have enabled Bluetooth
-I am signed into my iCloud account
-I am connected to the Wi-Fi network of my university (enterprise network)
On my iPhone
-I am currently running iOS 8.0.2 on an iPhone 6 Plus
-I have enabled Handoff in the General Settings
-I have signed in to my iCloud account
-I have enabled Bluetooth and connected to the same Wi-Fi network
Are the continuity features simply not compatible with enterprise networks? My university (like most) has campus-wide wireless service, so I do not have/need a router. Or do I need to wait until iOS 8.1 to use these features. Some help would be appreciated.

Yes , I know that. Nevertheless, SeaMonkey was not certified with 10.2.0.5 but running without problems.
The question is: Has anyone of you guys found a trick to get SeaMonkey running with Grid 11gR1 ?

Is OBIEE 11g compatible with win 2003 sp2 64 bit OS

What is the difference between software only installation and enterprise install? Our company has win2003 sp2 64 bit OS on the server. Is it compatible to OBIEE 11.1.5 g.
Thanks,
Sushil

Hi,
There no compatible with win 2003 sp2 64 bit OS, you can install.for more refer BI Certification Matrix:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/ias/downloads/fusion-certification-100350.html
Simple Install :- Demonstration and Evaluation for Single-User Development .
software only install means it installs only the BI components not all the BI domain comoponents like java tools
Enterprise install :-Enterprise Deployment for Hosted Development and Production (this type enables you to specify several more configuration settings than the simple
FYI...
Software only install refer my blog and installation steps for Enterprise Installation
have a look for 4.5.2.3 Enterprise Install Procedure for New Installations on
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E21764_01/bi.1111/e10539/c4_installing.htm#CEGIAGBC
For diff between Simple and Enterprise Installations?
Refer: http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E21764_01/bi.1111/e10539/c2_scenarios.htm#CHDHFGEI
Thanks
Deva

OMS version 10.2.0.4.2 is not compatible with repository version 10.1.0.4.0

Im trying to start the database enterprise manager and I get this error on the log file:
OMS version 10.2.0.4.2 is not compatible with repository version 10.1.0.4.0 Repository needs to be patched.
Database version is 11.2
O.S. version is: Linux 2.6.9-78.0.0.0.1.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Jul 25 14:41:56 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
I use this to upload database and console:
export ORACLE_HOME=/opt/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/
export ORACLE_BASE=/opt/oracle/
export ORACLE_SID=orcl
/opt/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/bin/lsnrctl start
/opt/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/bin/dbstart /opt/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/
/opt/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/bin/emctl start dbconsole
when I excecute that, I see this on the console:
Oracle Enterprise Manager 11g Database Control Release 11.2.0.1.0
Copyright (c) 1996, 2009 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
https://192.168.2.210:1158/em/console/aboutApplication
Starting Oracle Enterprise Manager 11g Database Control ........... started.
Logs are generated in directory /opt/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/machine_one_lega/sysman/log
So I try to go there, and the web browser shows this:
503 Service Unavailable
Service is not initialized correctly. OMS version 10.2.0.4.2 is not compatible with repository version 10.1.0.4.0.
Can you help me find this solution?
thanks

Hi Ingenio,
This problem sometimes occur when the listener is not running, hence connection cannot be done without listener.

Error :"The provider is not compatible with the version of Oracle client"

Hi guys!
I'm facing this problem:
When my .Net application tries to access the DB, I get this error message above.
The application is into the same machine of DB and the operational system is Windows Server Enterprise 64 bits.
I'm comparing to another machine that has the same scenario but runs in Windows Vista 64 bits. This problem doesn't happen and I can normally access the DB.
The both database versions are 10g Release 2 (10.2) and all components from Oracle Database Components 10.2.0.2.21 are installed as the containing bellow:
-Oracle Data Provider for .NET 1.x 10.2.0.2.20
-Oracle Data Provider for .NET 2.0 10.2.0.2.20
-Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio .NET 2003 10.2.0.2.20
-Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio 2005 10.2.0.2.20
-Oracle Provider for OLE DB 10.2.0.2.20
-Oracle Objects for OLE 10.2.0.2.20
-Oracle Services For Microsoft Transaction Server 10.2.0.1.0
-Oracle Net 10.2.0.1.0
-Oracle Universal Installer 10.2.0.2.0
Oracle.DataAcces.DLL is 2.102.2.20 and it is reference in my .Net app (that is published and located into IIS).
These are the Oracle assemblies installes in 'C:\Windows\Assembly':
Windows Vista Machine:
ASSEMBLY NAME VERSION CULTURE PUBLIC KEY TOKEN PROCESS ARCHITECTURE
Oracle.DataAccess 10.2.0.100 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 pt-BR 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 it 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 fr 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 es 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 de 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.Management.Omo 2.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342 x86
Oracle.VsDevTools 2.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342 x86
Policy.10.1.Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Policy.10.2.Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Windows Server Machine:
ASSEMBLY NAME VERSION CULTURE PUBLIC KEY TOKEN PROCESS ARCHITECTURE
Oracle.DataAccess 10.2.0.100 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess 2.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342 x86
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 pt-BR 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 zh-CHT 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 zh-CHS 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 ko 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 jp 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 it 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 fr 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 es 89b483f429c47342
Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 de 89b483f429c47342
Policy.10.1.Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Policy.10.2.Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Policy.9.2.Oracle.DataAccess 10.2.0.100 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
Policy.9.2.Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
What should I check and do to solve this problems?
Thanks for help,
Anderson

Hi,
Often the error "The provider is not compatible with the version of Oracle client" is raised when the unmanaged dll OraOpsX.dll can't be found, can't be loaded, or is the wrong version. For version 10.2.0.x of ODP.NET and .NET Framework 2.x the file should be called "OraOps10w.dll" and should be found in the %ORACLE_HOME%\bin directory.
Since the ODAC pieces are installed on the same host as the database, are they in a separate Oracle Home or the same Oracle Home as the database software? If there are multiple Oracle Home directories, which one is in the system path first?
I would start with verifying the version of OraOps10w.dll and the system path on the server. You might also confirm that the Oracle Home directory (and everything under it) has the following permissions for Authenticated Users:
- Read & Execute
- List folder contents
- Read
Regards,
Mark

RCVCAT database is not compatible with this version of RMAN

I am getting the below error while trying to configure rman catalog datababse.
rman target prod_dba/Pass1234@proddb catalog cat_dba/Pass1234@catdb
Recovery Manager: Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
Copyright (c) 1995, 2002, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
connected to target database: TESTDB (DBID=2409515669)
connected to recovery catalog database
recovery catalog is not installed
RMAN>
RMAN> register database;
recovery catalog is not installed
recovery catalog is not installed
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00569: =============== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===============
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-03002: failure of register command at 07/20/2007 19:05:40
RMAN-06429: RCVCAT database is not compatible with this version of RMAN
RMAN>
And Oracle version is same in proddb and catdb
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
PL/SQL Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
CORE 9.2.0.1.0 Production
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
any inputs...
Thanks.

Hi,
when upgrading catalog am getting the error like,
error occurred in source file: krmk.pc, line: 6986
text of failing SQL statement: ╠≥`☺
ORACLE error from recovery catalog database: ORA-00942: table or view does not e
xist
error occurred in source file: krmk.pc, line: 6986
text of failing SQL statement: ╠≥`☺
ORACLE error from recovery catalog database: ORA-00942: table or view does not e
xist
error occurred in source file: krmk.pc, line: 6986
text of failing SQL statement:µ`☺
ORACLE error from recovery catalog database: ORA-00942: table or view does not e
xist
Whether i need to run catpath.sql etc on the db?

ADF from JDeveloper 10.1.2 not compatible with iAS 9.0.1

Hi,
We developed an ADF Application with JDeveloper 10.1.2 and we use the ADF interMedia domains (e.g. oracle.ord.im.OrdDocDomain). The application runs fine in JDeveloper, but doesn't run on our iAS 9.0.4.1. We get the following exception:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: oracle/sql/DatumWithConnection
at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:219)
at oracle.jbo.common.java2.JDK2ClassLoader.loadClassForName(JDK2ClassLoader.java:38)
at oracle.jbo.common.JBOClass.forName(JBOClass.java:161)
at oracle.jbo.common.JBOClass.findDataClass(JBOClass.java:203)
at oracle.jbo.server.AttributeDefImpl.initFromXML(AttributeDefImpl.java:2061)
at oracle.jbo.server.AttributeDefImpl.loadFromXML(AttributeDefImpl.java:2013)
at oracle.jbo.server.EntityDefImpl.loadAttribute(EntityDefImpl.java:2815)
at oracle.jbo.server.EntityDefImpl.loadAttributes(EntityDefImpl.java:2779)
at oracle.jbo.server.EntityDefImpl.loadFromXML(EntityDefImpl.java:2362)
at oracle.jbo.server.EntityDefImpl.loadFromXML(EntityDefImpl.java:2106)
at oracle.jbo.server.MetaObjectManager.loadFromXML(MetaObjectManager.java:514)
[...rest of stacktrace omitted ...]
The problem is that the JDBC version of the iAS 9.0.4.1 is missing the class DatumWithConnection that is indirectly referenced by the interMedia classes supplied with JDeveloper 10.1.2.
In detail, oracle.ord.im.OrdDoc uses oracle.sql.STRUCT. The inheritance hierarchy of STRUCT is different in the JDBC versions on iAS 9.0.4.1 (oracle.sql.Datum <- oracle.sql.STRUCT) and JDeveloper 10.1.2 (oracle.sql.Datum <- oracle.sql.DatumWithConnection <- oracle.sql.STRUCT). The class file of oracle.ord.im.OrdDoc (from 10.1.2. JDeveloper) was apparently compiled the new JDBC driver version since it contains a reference to oracle.sql.DatumWithConnection. And that class cannot be found if run on iAS 9.0.4.1 with its old JDBC version.
I think this is a very serious problem, since it means that ADF from JDeveloper 10.1.2 is not compatible with iAS 9.0.4.1, in contradiction to the support matrix (http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/jdev/collateral/papers/10g/as_supportmatrix.html).
Upgrading the JDBC Driver on the iAS seems to be the only clean solution for this problem (we also tried using old versions of the ordim.jar etc. but that always leads to other problems). But simply exchanging the JDBC jar-files on the server breaks the Enterprise Manager on our iAS installation.
I have two questions:
1) Is there a recommended workaround for the compatibility issue described above?
2) Is there a documented and supported way to upgrade the JDBC driver of iAS 9.0.4.1? I searched OTN and MetaLink and haven't found anything about this.
Kind Regards,
Kay
P.S. It is surprising that this problem is rarely mentioned in the OTN forums at all. The only relevant thread is on the JHeadstart Forum:
JHeadstart Deployment Issue
P.S.2
More info on what we tested:
We have thoroughly checked that the 10.1.2. ADF runtime was correctly deployed on our iAS 9.0.4.1. We installed a OC4J 9.0.4.0.0 standalone on the same linux machine as our iAS 9.0.4.1 and deployed our application on it, getting the same error (java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: oracle/sql/DatumWithConnection) as on the iAS. Replacing the JDBC drivers of the OC4J standalone with the version that came with JDeveloper 10.1.2 solved the problem.

I don't think that mixing classes from different jar file is a good idea. Nevertheless, we tested this approach already. Adding the DatumWithConnection.class from the 10.1.0.3.0 JDBC version to the jar file of the original JDBC version (of the iAS 9.0.4.1.0) caused a java.lang.VerifyError to appear.
The DatumWithConnection class is not simply added in the newer JDBC version. It is inserted into the inheritance hierarchy of oracle.sql.STRUCT and oracle.sql.Datum. Simply providing the new class next to the old JDBC driver will not work.
To give more information about what's wrong with updating the complete JDBC driver, I justed tested it again. To update the JDBC driver I stopped the server, changed the contents of jdbc/lib, started the server. I tried it with JDBC Version 9.2.0.5 as well as 10.1.0.3.0.
In both cases, our own application works, i.e. no more NoClassDefFoundError caused by oracle.sql.DatumWithConnection.
The Enterprise Manager shows strange behaviour, however. Some features work as usual but, for example, when I click on the "Applications" tab for our OC4J instance, we just get the following error shown in the browser:
An error was encountered while loading page. Failed to initialize configuration management user session.. See base exception for details.
Root Cause: TDU
Resolution: See base exception for details.. TDU
In one of the server logs I found the following stacktrace:
java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: TDU
     at oracle.net.resolver.NavDescription.navigate(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.resolver.NavServiceAlias.navigate(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.resolver.AddrResolution.resolveAddrTree(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.resolver.AddrResolution.resolveAndExecute(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.ns.NSProtocol.establishConnection(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.ns.NSProtocol.connect(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.jdbc.ttc7.TTC7Protocol.connect(TTC7Protocol.java:1777)
     at oracle.jdbc.ttc7.TTC7Protocol.logon(TTC7Protocol.java:215)
     at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleConnection.<init>(OracleConnection.java:365)
     at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver.getConnectionInstance(OracleDriver.java:547)
     at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver.connect(OracleDriver.java:347)
     at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:512)
     at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:171)
     at oracle.context.isearch.admin.users.InstanceManager.getSchemaConnection(InstanceManager.java:688)
     at test.admin__status._jspService(_admin__status.java:112)
     at com.orionserver[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.1.0)].http.OrionHttpJspPage.service(OrionHttpJspPage.java:56)
     at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspPageTable.service(JspPageTable.java:349)
     at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspServlet.internalService(JspServlet.java:509)
     at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:413)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.1.0)].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.invoke(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:765)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.1.0)].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.forwardInternal(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:317)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.1.0)].server.http.HttpRequestHandler.processRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:793)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.1.0)].server.http.AJPRequestHandler.run(AJPRequestHandler.java:208)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.1.0)].server.http.AJPRequestHandler.run(AJPRequestHandler.java:125)
     at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (9.0.4.1.0)].util.ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor$MyWorker.run(ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor.java:192)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
Kind Regards,
Kay

RMAN-06429: TARGET database is not compatible with this version of RMAN

he Hi,
how can i solve this issue . how i will upgrade the Rman. My production database details are below
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Prod
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.1.0 Production
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
while i'm configuring rman i'm getting below error . please help me.
C:\Documents and Settings\vj.dcruz>rman target / catalog rman01/rman01@upp
Recovery Manager: Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production on Wed Sep 14 08:18:02 2011
Copyright (c) 1982, 2009, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Recovery Manager incompatible with TARGET database: RMAN 8.0.4.0 to 10.2.0.0 required
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00569: =============== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===============
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00554: initialization of internal recovery manager package failed
RMAN-06429: TARGET database is not compatible with this version of RMAN
rgds,
john

Johnvd wrote:
Hi Hemant,
i'm doing same thing login 10.2.0.0 database and configure the rman but while connect target its saying that my Recovery Manager: Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production on Wed Sep 14 09:04:59 2011
how its happening is there any where i have to change the path.
Regards,
johnJohn, you need to use the RMAN binary which is located in bin folder of Oracle Database (ie /u01/oracle/product/10.2/db1/bin). You shouldn't use "rman which comes with Oracle 11g client".
If you are using windows, run the following commands in command prompt and then copy/paste the output:
echo 5ORACLE_HOME%
echo %PATH%
If you are using unix, run the following commands in terminal and then copy/paste the output:
echo $ORACLE_HOME
echo $PATH
Regards
Gokhan

Help!!! (CrystalDecisions.Web.CrystalReportViewer) is not compatible with the type of control (CrystalDecisions.Web.CrystalReportViewer)

Post Author: mrmc
CA Forum: General
Hi all,
Recently, I got problem on using cystal report on asp.net web. the error msg is:
Parser Error Message: The base class includes the field 'viewer', but its type (CrystalDecisions.Web.CrystalReportViewer) is not compatible with the type of control (CrystalDecisions.Web.CrystalReportViewer).
in the code:
<%@ Register TagPrefix="ce" Namespace="CrystalDecisions.Enterprise.WebControls" Assembly="CrystalDecisions.Enterprise.Web, Version=11.0.3300.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=692fbea5521e1304" %>
<CR:CrystalReportViewer id="viewer" runat="server" AutoDataBind="true" HasCrystalLogo="False" Width="350px" Height="50px" HasToggleGroupTreeButton="False" DisplayGroupTree="False" HasGotoPageButton="False" HasRefreshButton="True" DisplayToolbar="False"></CR:CrystalReportViewer>
In web.config
<add assembly="CrystalDecisions.Web, Version=11.0.3300.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=1234567890"/>
the server contains crytal report 9 (come from .net studio) and crytal report 11 (installed standalone).
I googled this problem, it seems a lot of people got this problem but no solution...
could anyone help me? Thanks!

Post Author: david.wilkes
CA Forum: General
You might try Removing the Reference and re-adding the reference. That seemed to get me pass this error, but I ran into another error that I have not figured out yet.

Error on Data Flow Task MSSQL 2012 Clustered "Description: The version of Lookup is not compatible with this version of the DataFlow. "

We have an SSIS package that runs on clustered MSSQL 2012 Enterprise Nodes that is failing. We use a job to executer the package.
Environmental information:
Product - Microsoft SQL Server Enterprise: Core-based Licensing (64-bit)
Operating System - Microsoft Windows NT 6.1 (7601)
Patform - NT x64
Version - MSSQL Version 11.0.3349.0
Package is set to 32 -bit. All permissions verified. Runs in lower environments, same MSSQL version. All environments are clustered. In the failing environment, all nodes are at the same service pack. I have not verified if all
nodes in the failing environment have SSIS installed. Data access is installed. We have other simpler packages that run in this environment, just not this one. Time to ask the community for help!
Error:
Source: Data Flow Task - Data Flow Task (SSIS.Pipeline) Description: The version of Lookup is not compatible with this version of the DataFlow. End Error Error: Code: 0xC0048020
Description: Component "Conditional Split, clsid {7F88F654-4E20-4D14-84F4-AF9C925D3087}" could not be created and returned error code 0x80070005 "Access is denied.". Make sure that the component is registered correctly. End Error
Description: The component is missing, not registered, not upgradeable, or missing required interfaces. The contact information for this component is "Conditional Split;Microsoft Corporation; Microsoft SQL Server; (C) Microsoft Corporation; All Rights
Reserved; http://www.microsoft.com/sql/support;0". End Error
(Left out shop specific information. This is the first error in the errors returns by the job history for this package. )
Thanks in advance.

Hi DeveloperMax,
According to your description, the error occurs when you execute the package with Agent job on clustered MSSQL 2012 Enterprise Nodes.
As per my understanding, I think this issue can be caused by you use SQL Server Agent to schedule a SQL Server Integration Services package in a 64-bit environment. And the SSIS package is referencing some 32-Bit DLL or 32-Bit drivers which are available
only in 32-bit versions, so the job failed.
To fix this issue, we should use the 32-bit version of the DTExec.exe utility to schedule the 64-bit SQL Server Agent to run a package. To run a package in 32-bit mode from a 64-bit version of SQL Server Agent, we can go to the Job Step dialog box, then
select “32 bit runtime” in the Advanced tab.
Besides, we should make sure that SQL Server Integration Services is installed on the failing environment.
If there are any other questions, please feel free to ask.
Thanks,
Katherine Xiong
Katherine Xiong
TechNet Community Support

EXP-00037: Export views not compatible with database version

kindly help with this error. We have already run catexp.sql but still that is not helping, we are still getting the same error.
we are exporting 8i db.
Export: Release 8.1.7.0.0 - Production on Thu Feb 21 14:34:25 2008
(c) Copyright 2000 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
Connected to: Oracle8i Enterprise Edition Release 8.1.7.0.0 - Production
With the Partitioning option
JServer Release 8.1.7.0.0 - Production
EXP-00037: Export views not compatible with database version
EXP-00000: Export terminated unsuccessfully

Does this apply to you?
Error: EXP 37
Text: Export views not compatible with database version
Cause: The Export utility is at a higher version than the database version
and is thereby incompatible.
Action: Use the same version of Export utility as the database.

Workstation 11.1, Tools 9.9.2 build-2496486: Not compatible with GCC 5.1.0 on linux (Arch, Debian, Ubuntu, etc)

First, there are some compilation problems with the latest linux kernel and Tools 9.9.2's source of vmhgfs: vmhgfs module not compilable for VMware Tools 9.9.0 (Fusion7.1) after Ubuntu Linux kernel update to 3.13.0-46-generic (Febr. 2015) (Shared Folder Feature not working in Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (Guest) on MacOSX Yosemite (Host))?
In short, you have to patch the source to get it to compile: rasa/vmware-tools-patches · GitHub
Arch linux is a "rolling" distro, meaning we always have latest - and are usually the first to find problems before it trickles down to Ubuntu, Mint, Debian and other Linux distros. Well, now there is a serious problem that is unresolvable.
The vmhgfs source is not compatible with linux kernels built with gcc 5.1.0. It hard locks the VM, requiring a hard reset when the kernel module loads. It also hard locks during vmware-tools-install.pl torwards the very end when it says, "Guest filesystem driver" enabling. And on boot, it is vmhgfs that is being loaded when the VM hard locks.
I was able to get around this earlier when gcc 4.9.2 was in core - i just rebuilt the kernel under 4.9.2: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=196915
Obviously that isn't a long-term solution. But now that gcc 5.1.0 has been pushed out to core, that means recompiling the kernel under 4.9.2 is no easy feat since dependencies now depend on gcc 5.1.0.
@Developers: We have a big problem with VMware Tools vmhgfs and kernels compiled under gcc 5.1.0. Given it make take years before the Debian distros get the latest and greatest, it's coming.
Because of this, and the wasted time in me having to support this mess, I may recommend to my company we no longer continue with our Enterprise account of 100 licenses of Workstation and Fusion. It is obvious in the previous thread vmhgfs module not compilable for VMware Tools 9.9.0 (Fusion7.1) after Ubuntu Linux kernel update to 3.13.0-46-generic (Febr. 2015) (Shared Folder Feature not working in Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (Guest) on MacOSX Yosemite (Host))? that VMware is no hurry to resolve even the simple build errors that the community has resolved last year with patches. Good thing too, renewal comes up in two months.
I shiver to think how long it will take VMware to release a fix for gcc 5.1.0.

Additional info...
The hard lock is a panic when mounting the /mnt/hgfs partition, which is what is configured in my fstab:
.host:/
/mnt/hgfs
vmhgfs
defaults
0 0
The reason the above is just "./host:/" is for the auto-mounting of shares on the fly, or all shares on boot. Specifying a share doesn't change anything.
Even mounting it manually panic's the kernel:
mount -n -t vmhgfs .host:/<shared_folder> /home/user1/shares
Again, this all worked fine with a kernel built on 4.9.2, but not 5.1.0.

IPhone 2.0 software now compatible with Photoshop Elements 6?

While the current software is compatible with earlier versions of Photoshop Elements, it is not compatible with Elements 6 since Abobe changed their database (nor longer using Access). I notice that the specs on iPhone 3G say compatible with Photoshop Elements.
Can anyone confirm that means Elements 6?

However, to be fair, while there may be savings to be had, your company would have to replace existing phones with iPhones and tie everyone into one carrier (which accross a multi-office environment may not be practical, due to coverage issues). The iPhone does not offer the level of encryption available to a Blackberry/RIM handset, or the ability to enforce security policies on handsets, which may be a concern to your IT and Security people. It also misses some useful features (such as searching email for words/phrases. This is a feature I use regularly on my Blackberry, and I'm disappointed to not find it on my iPhone. ). And there is the whole, One Vendor issue that may worry some (you can connect non-RIM, e.g. Nokia, etc, phones to your BES providing the phone supports the required blackberry software).
I've got to say, as much as I love my iPhone (and I'm personally migrating from my blackberry to it) I don't think I'd recommend it as an enterprise phone.... yet... It's still got a way to go. As a personal+business phone, I'm giving it a shot (as the personal side is quite good). My current employer is a small company, with no BES, so I use my carrier's BIS, and get by with it. As such, the calendar+contacts sync available through mobileMe is a plus . If I was planning IT direction for a larger organisation though, I'd be considering the iPhone (if for no other reason than an excuse to play with one ), but I wouldn't be preparing a migration just yet!

Is Enterprise 6.2.1 compatible with Win2003

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for