Is it ok in the long run to placing a RGB photoshop eps file into a Illustrator CS2 CMYK color mode

Is it ok in the long run to placing a RGB photoshop eps file into a Illustrator CS2 CMYK color mode document ?
I am using windows XP with Adobe Creative suite 2.
In both Adobe Photoshop CS2 and Illustrator CS2 have the same color settings.
If I take a RGB file that was created in Photoshop CS2 and place this file in a CMYK color mode document in Illustrator CS2, does this cause a problem for the output of the document ?
If you look at the ''Document Info'' window you can now see that the RGB file is now a CMYK file. Is this a good working habit ?
Thanks in advance. :)

>Is it ok in the long run to placing a RGB photoshop eps file into a Illustrator CS2 CMYK color mode document ?
Please explain why you would do such a thing? (Why RGB, and why EPS.)
>If I take a RGB file that was created in Photoshop CS2 and place this file in a CMYK color mode document in Illustrator CS2, does this cause a problem for the output of the document ?
Yes.
You are working in CMYK mode presumably because your Illustrator document is destined for output on a PostScript device -- e.g., a printing press. That means that your RGB image will undergo a space conversion somewhere in the process, and the questions are when and how?
The issue is compounded by the fact that Illustrator ignores color profiles embedded in EPS files by Photoshop. (Just another reason not to use EPS.)
By performing the conversion yourself in Photoshop, you take control of the process and ensure predictable color.

Similar Messages

Re:How to determine the long running jobs in a patch

Hi ,
How to determine the long running jobs in a patch .
Regards

Hi,
Check the below MY ORACLE SUPPORT note:
Note.252422.1 .... Check Completed Long Running Jobs In Oracle Apps.
Best regards,
Rafi

Does using the home button in 4s would result to being damage in the long run? I really don't like the assistive.

I do prefer using the home button. Will it somehow be 'damaged' in the long run? I just need assurance. *TIA.

Any mechanical component is subject to failure. If it does fail, if your device is in hardware warranty, it would likely be replaced. If you are still within the first year, purchase AppleCare to extend the warranty for an additional year.

Query to find the long running concurrent requests morethan 2 hours

Can any one please provide the " Query to find the long running concurrent requests which are running more than 2 hours"

You need to find the different between the current time/date and FND_CONCURRENT_REQUESTS.ACTUAL_START_DATE for the running requests.
More details can be found in the following notes:
Note: 187504.1 - bde_request.sql - Process and Session info for one Concurrent Request (11.5)
https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=187504.1
Note: 134035.1 - ANALYZEREQ.SQL - Detailed Analysis of One Concurrent Request (Release 11 and up)
https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=134035.1
Note: 751438.1 - How To Check List , Start And End Dates Of A Parent Concurrent Request And All Childs
https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=751438.1

Finding the long running queries

Hello, I am able to find the long running queries in my database as below.
SQL> select sid,serial#
2 from v$session_longops
3 where time_remaining > 0
4 order by time_remaining desc;
SID SERIAL#
1100 4411
1383 3912
1295 2493
SQL>
With this info, i want to find out what sql code related to these (SID,SERIAL#). The SQL code comes from v$sqlarea. But i am not able to join v$session_longops with v$sqlarea. Any help is highly appreciated.
Here is my database version.
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production

Thank you!!!
select
A.SID ,
A.SERIAL# ,
A.OPNAME ,
A.TARGET ,
A.TARGET_DESC,
A.SOFAR ,
A.TOTALWORK ,
A.UNITS ,
A.START_TIME ,
A.LAST_UPDATE_TIME ,
A.ELAPSED_SECONDS ,
A.CONTEXT ,
A.MESSAGE ,
A.USERNAME ,
B.sql_fulltext
from     v$session_longops a,
v$sqlarea b
where a.sql_id = b.sql_id
and     time_remaining > 0
order by time_remaining desc

Whats better for my mbp 2013 retina in the long run? Keep it plugged in as much as possible or letting the battery hit 10% and then recharge it?

Whats better for my mbp 2013 retina in the long run? Keep it plugged in as much as possible or letting the battery hit 10% and then recharge it?

Odd you ask that, since both are HORRIBLE,   ... especially often draining your battery low.
General consideration of your MacBook battery
Contrary to popular myths about notebook batteries, there is protection circuitry in your Macbook and therefore you cannot ‘overcharge’ your notebook when plugged in and already fully charged.
However if you do not plan on using your notebook for several hours, turn it off (plugged in or otherwise), since you do not want your Macbook ‘both always plugged in and in sleep mode’.
A lot of battery experts call the use of Lithium-Ion cells the "80% Rule", meaning use 80% of the full charge or so, then recharge them for longer overall life. The only quantified damage done in the use of Lithium Ion batteries are instances where the internal notebook battery is “often drained very low”, this is bad general use of your notebook battery.
A person who has, for example, 300 charge cycles on their battery and is recharging at say 40% remaining of a 100% charge has a better battery condition state than, say, another person who has 300 charge cycles on their battery and is recharging at say 10-15% remaining on a 100% charge. DoD (depth of discharge) is much more important on the wear and tear on your Macbook’s battery than the count of charge cycles. There is no set “mile” or wear from a charge cycle in specific. Frequent high depth of discharge rates (draining the battery very low) on a Lithium battery will hasten the lowering of maximum battery capacity.
All batteries in any device are a consumable meant to be replaced eventually after much time, even under perfect use conditions.
If the massive amount of data that exists on lithium batteries were to be condensed into a simplex, helpful, and memorable bit of information it would be:
1. While realistically a bit impractical during normal everyday use, a lithium battery's longevity and its chemistry's health is most happy swinging back and forth between 20% and 85% charge roughly.
2. Do not purposefully drain your battery very low (10% and less), and do not keep them charged often or always high (100%).
3. Lithium batteries do not like the following:
A: Deep discharges, as meaning roughly 10% or less on a frequent basis.
B: Rapid discharges as referring to energy intensive gaming on battery on a frequent basis (in which case while gaming, if possible, do same on power rather than battery). This is a minor consideration.
C: Constant inflation, as meaning always or most often on charge, and certainly not both in sleep mode and on charge always or often.
From Apple on batteries:
http://www.apple.com/batteries/notebooks.html
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1446
"Apple does not recommend leaving your portable plugged in all the time."
Keep it plugged in when near a socket so you keep the charging cycles down on your LiPo (lithium polymer) cells / battery, but not plugged in all the time. When not being used for several hours, turn it off.
DoD (depth of discharge) is far more important on the wear and tear on your Macbook battery than any mere charge cycle count. *There is no set “mile” or wear from a charge cycle in general OR in specific.    As such, contrary to popular conception, counting cycles is not conclusive whatsoever, rather the amount of deep DoD on an averaged scale of its use and charging conditions.
                          (as a very rough analogy would be 20,000 hard miles put on a car vs. 80,000 good miles being something similar)
*Contrary to some myths out there, there is protection circuitry in your Macbook and therefore you cannot overcharge it when plugged in and already fully charged
*However if you don’t plan on using it for a few hours, turn it OFF (plugged in or otherwise) ..*You don’t want your Macbook both always plugged in AND in sleep mode       (When portable devices are charging and in the on or sleep position, the current that is drawn through the device is called the parasitic load and will alter the dynamics of charge cycle. Battery manufacturers advise against parasitic loading because it induces mini-cycles.)
Keeping batteries connected to a charger ensures that periodic "top-ups" do very minor but continuous damage to individual cells, hence Apples recommendation above:   “Apple does not recommend leaving your portable plugged in all the time”, …this is because “Li-ion degrades fastest at high state-of-charge”.
                    This is also the same reason new Apple notebooks are packaged with 50% charges and not 100%.
Contrary to what some might say, Lithium batteries have an "ideal" break in period. First ten cycles or so, don't discharge down past 40% of the battery's capacity. Same way you don’t take a new car out and speed and rev the engine hard first 100 or so miles.
Proper treatment is still important. Just because LiPo batteries don’t need conditioning in general, does NOT mean they dont have an ideal use / recharge environment. Anything can be abused even if it doesn’t need conditioning.
Storing your MacBook
If you are going to store your MacBook away for an extended period of time, keep it in a cool location (room temperature roughly 22° C or about 72° F). Make certain you have at least a 50% charge on the internal battery of your Macbook if you plan on storing it away for a few months; recharge your battery to 50% or so every six months roughly if being stored away. If you live in a humid environment, keep your Macbook stored in its zippered case to prevent infiltration of humidity on the internals of your Macbook which could lead to corrosion.
Considerations:
Your battery is subject to chemical aging even if not in use. A Lithium battery is aging as soon as its made, regardless.
In a perfect (although impractical) situation, your lithium battery is best idealized swinging back and forth between 20 and 85% SOC (state of charge) roughly.
Further still how you discharge the battery is far more important than how it is either charged or stored short term, and more important long term that cycle counts.
Ultimately counting charge cycles is of little importance. Abuse in discharging (foremost), charging, and storing the battery and how it affects battery chemistry is important and not the ‘odometer’ reading, or cycle counts on the battery.
Everything boils down to battery chemistry long term, and not an arbitrary number, or cycle count.
Keep your macbook plugged in when near a socket since in the near end of long-term life, this is beneficial to the battery.
In a lithium battery, deep discharges alter the chemistry of the anode to take up lithium ions and slowly damages the batteries capacity for the cathode to transport lithium ions to the anode when charging, thereby reducing max charge levels in mAh. In short, radical swings of power to lithium cells disrupts the chemical ecosystem of the battery to hold charges correctly which likewise impedes the perfect transfer of lithium ions both in charging and discharging. In charging your lithium battery, lithium ions are “pushed uphill” (hard) to the anode, and discharged “downhill” (easy) to the cathode when on battery power. Deep discharges, damages this “upward” electrolyte chemistry for the battery to maintain a healthy charge and discharge balance relative to its age and cycles.
Optimally, in terms of a healthy lithium battery and its condition, it is most happy at 50% between extremes, which is why low-power-drain processors such as the Haswell are ideal on lithium battery health since a partially charged battery with a low-drain processor has, in general, much more usage in hours
Battery calibration, battery memory, battery overcharging, battery training, …all these concepts are mostly holdovers from much older battery technology, and on older Apple portable Macbooks ranging from early nicads, NiMh and otherwise; and these practices do not apply to your lithium battery and its smart controllers.
Calibrating the battery on older Apple portable Macbooks with removable batteries.
http://support.apple.com/kb/PH14087
There is no calibration of current Apple portable Macbooks with built-in batteries.
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1490
There is no battery calibration with current Apple portable Macbooks with built-in batteries. Lithium batteries have essentially a 0-‘memory’, and all such calibration involve the estimations fed to the system controller on the SOC (state of charge) of the battery over long periods of time as the battery degrades. The software based battery controller knows the battery's characteristics, or SOC and adjusts itself. This is why there is both no need and purpose to periodically deeply drain your macbook battery, since it doesn’t affect the characteristics of the battery, and further still deep discharges are something you should not do on purpose to any lithium battery.
From BASF: How Lithium Batteries work
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PjyJhe7Q1g
Peace

In the long run BI

Hi all,
Do you think BI - Business Intelligence- module will replace abap in the long run?
Thanks for writing your opinions.

Hi Martin Shinks,
Of course abap and bi are not the same, however it is obvious that abap is used to create reports so much.
The relation is here, you can get comprehensive reports from BI can't you?
So abap's effect can slow down.
Thanks

How do you find out what the font type is when you open a .eps file

I've been sent a logo in a .eps file and I need to edit. However I can't see what font type has been used!
Thanks Claire

Claire,
You may also try here,
http://www.identifont.com/
http://www.whatfontis.com/
Or ask in the Typography forum,
http://forums.adobe.com/community/design_development/typography?view=discussions&start=0
Edit: Hi elDudereno.

Is the CMYK color mode available in Photoshop Elements 12?

In taking a photography course I was introduced to color printing modes in Photoshop CS6 which includes CMYK as one of the modes. I am currently using Photoshop Elements 11 which is limited to the RGB color mode. Does Elements 12 offer CMYK?

No, this is one of the areas where Adobe is determined to keep a difference between PSE and full Photoshop. No version of PSE has CMYK support and it's unlikely to come in a future version, either, I'm afraid.

How to find the CMYK, RGB values for an RasterItem in illustrator CS2 using Javascript??

Hi,
I want to find the color space of an raster item. I can able to get its color space using
app.activeDocument.rasterItems[0].imageColorSpace
if i found it o be CMYK color space, i need to find its value to know which color is present in the document.
Thanks in advance,
Poovili

People have asked that before & I don't actually know. It seems pretty likely it's in the SDK somewhere though. I'd try searching the API folder for phrases that might relate to this and then investigate.

How will the Macbook do in the long run ?

I will be buying a new Macbook when Leopard and iLife 07 are released. However, I have been increasingly hearing and reading negative feedback about the Intel GMA950 in the Macbook, so I've been looking to stretch my budget and get the low end 15" Macbook Pro instead. I know the GMA950 is sufficient for Core Image in Tiger and Leopard, but what when OS X.6 is released, say in about 2,5 tot 3 years ? I can't afford to buy a new Mac every 3 years. So basically, I'm wondering whether the Macbook is a 'futureproof' investment. I simple cannot believe that 64Mb of video memory will be sufficient, especially when you see that every graphics card you can find, even the cheap ones, carry 128Mb or more. I'm not going to ask whether the next revision of the Macbook will feature an improved graphics system, or if more video memory can be allocated by a firmware update (although that will eat away even more system memory), but I think that many people are asking themselves these questions. I don't need a powerful videocard now, since I'm not a gamer and don't do heavy 3D-stuff ; I'll be using my macbook for photo-editing (low end photoshop elements - plan to wait for universal binary), video-editing (iMovie, maybe Final Cut Express), iDVD, webdesign (Rapidweaver),... so really no high-end stuff. So I'm only 'thinking about the future' ! Thx for any feedback !

GMA950 shares memory the 64 MB is with the 512 MB ram. The more ram you have the more is shared I believe. Here is the spec on this site.
Memory available to Mac OS X may vary depending on graphics needs. Minimum graphics memory usage is 80MB, resulting in 432MB of system memory available on 1.83GHz models and 944MB of system memory available on 2.0GHz models.
This is with the stock memory that comes in each.
It varies depending on what you are doing and RAM installed.
I don't think any computer is "futureproof" but I personally think the MacBook is good enough for what you describe and will be for quite a while. I use it now with 1.25 gig of ram and watch movies in the background while working in photoshop CS. I have also run two different movies at the same time in separate windows to view differences as I work on them. No lag or problems have been noticed when I do this.
If you can afford it get the macbook pro but I don't think you will be disappointed with the macbook. You definitely get a lot of bang for your buck.
Mort

GX70 vs GT70 2OC - which is better in the long run?

Just asking for some advice and opinions in these two models. I know the CPU in the GT70 kills the GX70 but the GPU on the GX70 is a monster. Games I'll probably be playing include Skyrim, star wars old republic, star craft 2 - and who knows down the road.
The price of the GT70 goes a little advice my budget though - so if the differences aren't all that major I'd rather save the cash.
http://www.msimobile.com/level3_productpage.aspx?cid=6&id=392
http://www.msimobile.com/level3_productpage.aspx?cid=6&id=396
So the big question its which one will keep up better with newer games as time goes on? CPU vs GPU?

Quote from: stefanton on 26-June-13, 03:24:19
The issue for me is upgrading a dedicated GPU in a laptop - most of the stores i've asked about say it can't be done, you gotta get a whole new laptop (which is why laptop is not ideal for gaming - desktops are easier to mix-n-match).
Besides, who even sells mobile GPU cards in the retail world? Is there an online retailer that sells them? I am more interested in knowing this because, say a year from now nVidia releases a 800 series card that outperforms the 770m, and fits in the same PCI slot inside the notebook - i'd like to be able to swap them out.
The GT70 series uses MXM 3.0 sockets, as do most high end notebooks at this point in time. There are GT780's (the prior version of the GT70) that are running the GTX680M, and I'm sure there will be some using a GTX770M as well. I will most likely eventually put a GTX780M in my GT70 when I have the cash and the need.
I actually think you can order the cards from the MSI store. I'm not 100% certain on that, but I'm pretty sure you can.

Java in the long run. Reusing objects?

Is it really neccessary to break every code down into the smallest bean possible. I am aware that that it can make coding easier to use on the following write and understand BUT. Is it abs. neccessary to break it down into it's finest deail. For exaample. If I have a ap that needs to get a name from the user must I use a getName() name method that implement a getFirstName() getMiddleName() and getSurname method? The reason why I ask is that it makes the code extremely long to scale and search.

You can never have too many fields... I was involved in a "street address" project awhile back. Do you have any idea how many variations there are of a common 'ole garden street address? There's only about a thousand of them (OK, maybe I'm exagerating, just slightly)... but we'd been recording street addresses in various systems, each with a varying "incomplete" breakdown... add hundreds of users and the only consistency you can count on is total KAOS... which is real problem if you're the "point of truth" for "What is the "official" street address of this block of land."... and all we had was filthy free text data, which a human could (almost allways) interpret... but a computer, no chance... they're just too dumb.
Most (say a-half-million or so) of our problems could have been avoided if the programmers of yore had just used seperate fields for "unit number", "street number", and "street name" for starters, instead of just a free text "address line 1".
You can never have too many fields.

ERPs in the long run

Hey Gurus,
Can anyone of you please enlighten me on the comaprison of Oracle and SAP in terms of their functionalities, strategies etc. Just wanted to check this to have a view point for product evaluation.
I have some ideas about SAP but none for Oracle.
Rgds
NS

Neetu,
The race between oracle and SAP can be summarised as the race between Netweaver and Fusion and ultimately the winner will be survival of the fittest.
And, based on what I know about the two companies' strategies, given such an outcome, NetWeaver would be the winner, hands down.
The advantage for NetWeaver to win out is based on no small amount of digging into the two companies' plans. SAP has been plugging away at its NetWeaver strategy for several years now, while Oracle recently started works on these strategies.
Better roadmap
The first is that I believe SAP has done a better job of both articulating its roadmap for NetWeaver and delivering on it. To be fair, that is in part because they have been at it longer than Oracle. Remember, Fusion is barely a year old, whereas NetWeaver has been bandied about as a concept for almost three years. But I also believe that SAP's advantage in building out its own applications u2013 as opposed Oracle's strategy of acquiring or partnering to build its applications portfolio u2013 has allowed the market to see more clearly where SAP is going and what functionality will be available once the full force of NetWeaver's service architecture can be brought to bear on the market. Oracle's Fusion Middleware strategy is relatively well thought-out and well-defined, but the roadmap for Fusion Applications still has a lot of blank space in it u2013 placeholders for as-yet unannounced acquisitions and partnerships.
Vertical functionality
This brings the second point- Vertical industry-specific functionality is where the rubber hits the road as the future of enterprise applications unfolds. Indeed, all that trouble to build and implement service architectures like NetWeaver and Fusion would largely be for naught if all they did was enable more monolithic, general-purpose enterprise software. The real value-add for service architectures comes from their ability to take individual services and build them, Lego-like, into applications that are essentially mass-customized for individual business in individual industries.
This means that, in addition to a strong services infrastructure, a vendor needs a large portfolio of services to assemble u2013 the more the merrier. This is where SAP's next advantage comes into play. SAP's has experience in 28 verticals, and the software functionality to prove it. As NetWeaver unfolds, one of SAP's tasks will be to service-orient all that functionality and make it available as building blocks for the future. That's a non-trivial task, but one that, once done, provides SAP customers with an exceptionally large palette of vertical industry functionality on which to build their service-oriented future.
Oracle, on the other hand, has always lagged in providing deep vertical functionality, a fact acknowledged by the vertical focus of their acquisition and partnering strategy. While there is some deep vertical functionality now in the Fusion playbook u2013 Retek in retail was a major coup, and Siebel can provide some CRM-specific vertical functionality in the industries that it targeted u2013 the scope of this functionality still lags behind that of SAP. And while Oracle is now vowing to fill in the blanks with more partner products, until we can evaluate exactly what those products can do and how many vertical industries they allow Oracle to compete in, SAP still has the vertical industry advantage.
The Fusion timeline
Finally Oracle has very ambitious timeline for its Fusion Applications. Oracle argues that they are "halfway to Fusion", largely on the strength of their work on Fusion Middleware. But halfway to Fusion Applications u2013 particular a suite of highly verticalized service-oriented applications based on least six different code bases (if you count the pieces of software that make up its Oracle, PeopleSoft, J.D. Edwards, Siebel, Retek, and ProfitLogic product lines) u2013the scope of that task becomes very difficult. Bear in mind, Fusion Applications are slated to come out after Oracle releases updates to its eBusiness Suite, PeopleSoft, and J.D. Edwards lines. That is, to use a technical term, a boatload of application development work.
Sure Oracle is big, sure they're full of some of the smartest minds in the industryu2026 but history tells us that that huge software projects at a minimum tend to miss their deadlines, if not fail hugely. And while Oracle will definitlely not fail u2013 Fusion Applications will take more time.
Again, to be fair, SAP also has a monumental development task u2013 but it's from a single code-base of software that the company has spent 20-plus years developing. NetWeaver's timetable benefits greatly from its status as a next-generation project based on internally developed software, and not on a massive blending and rewriting of a half-dozen different applications and code-bases.
In the end, software evolution plays by different rules than biological evolution, and Fusion's prospects could change quickly in the next year or so. But, as things stand today, Fusion looks like a candidate for endangered species protection, even before it actually enters the race for survival. If biology defines software destiny, Fusion's destiny looks perilous at best.
Hope this gives u some idea.
Rgds
Manish

Reference or Library? Which is better for the long run?

I decided to waste a day and re-organize my disorganized database of photographs held within aperture. I don't have any experience with referencing files but I was considering whether there are pros and cons to having files externally referenced versus having them within the Aperture library.
My habits are non-routine and I shoot pretty much anything, so I'm looking for a system that will ensure my library is flexible, stable, and safe for future use and access.
I suppose the only reason I can think of for referencing is having some control of where the actual files are so I can access/refer to them with other apps.
Please share your thoughts, experiences, and preferences.

I guess you are right about the duplicates still being an issue even if you find them outside of Aperture, since you still need to delete the links within Aperture, correct?
I never really worked with migrating projects except for moving the sample projects out to save space.
I was trying to think of how I will manage a RAW library when I can get my hands on that equipment, but migrating projects doesn't seem like such a bad thing to do. In fact, it seems rather ideal. Most of the time, I only need access to certain projects in certain parts of the year, and the rest of the time I never touch the photos.
You all have convinced me to give the managed library another go as I restructure my database. But I am still looking for the best ways to catch duplicates within Aperture. I know that you can stem them upon import, but Aperture's import duplicate-recognition technology in not consistent at all for me. Photos can be exactly the same but if they were not imported from the same source (i.e. memory card vs. finder folder) then Aperture won't think anything of it.
This is off topic, but is there a way to customize Aperture's duplicate detection? You would think that a pro software (and Aperture is pro, right?) would allow this. I might start a new thread on this topic.
The reason for my current obsession with duplicates is that I have a library of 12.5 GB of photos that I am pretty certain are already in Aperture, but when I test an import with the check box for not importing dupes, Aperture considers all the photos new. I then go in and find that none in that folder are new, but instead that they are all already in Aperture as is. Granted, I'm not worried about dupes taken after my migration to Aperture but for all of my photos before then, I'm kind of in a bind still.

Is it ok in the long run to placing a RGB photoshop eps file into a Illustrator CS2 CMYK color mode

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for