Is it possible to maintain a high res workflow on new iPad?

I hope I'm wrong.
It does not seem possible for me to use all these amazing syncing tools such as photo stream, aperture, iPhoto and the camera roll to maintain a high res workflow.
I have an image shot on my iPhone 4 open in aperture acquired from photo stream at it's full size 1936 x 2592.
I view the same image in iPhoto on my "The New iPad" or iPhone 4 (that I shot the image on) and look at the info, it's been reduced to 1536 x 2056.
I also emailed myself the same image directly from photo stream from the new iPad and it's also showing up at the same reduced resolution.
When I email it from the phone and tell it to send the full size image it still opens up on my computer at the reduced size.
The help section of iPhoto on the iPad said that photo stream would send the images at full resolution to all my IOS devices.
Seems like the only way to acess a full res file is to pull them photo stream in aperture.
When I synced with aperture to populate my camera roll and iPhoto on the new iPad... all of my images are showing up on the iPad at the same reduced size... 1536 wide. (I already have my preferences set to not place limits on preview sizes).
Anyone have any insights?
Thank You

iCloud (Photo Stream) and iTunes both limit the resolution of images sent to iOS devices. Photo Stream does not limit the resolution of images sent to the PC or Mac.
If I load a picture in to my iPad 2 or 3 using the Camera Connection kit they come in at full resolution.
See: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4486

Similar Messages

Is it possible to use the free Pages app on new iPads when using Configurator?

We understood that Pages, Keynote, Numbers, and other apps would be free for our new iPads. We are a K12 school and use Apple Configurator to supervise student devices. These apps are showing up as paid apps. Is there a way to make this work?
If we log into iTunes on an unsupervised device, we can download the apps free. However, this is not possible for student devices.

Hi, Daniel,
Currently, the PXI-8221 is not supported under LabVIEW RT. If you need to have an external hard disk for additional disk space, I will recommend you getting a PXI-8252. This is a FireWire card and you can connect an external hard drive to it with the right HDD enclosure.
The following document should give you a better idea:
NI-1394 External Drive Support - Tutorial
Let me know if you have any questions.
GValdes
National Instruments

I have a iOS 3.2 system and want to upgrade to at least a iOS 4.3 -- is that possible or do I need to buy a new ipad

I have a iOS 3.2 system and want to upgrade to at least a iOS 4.3 -- is that possible or do I need to buy a new ipad

Upgrading iOS
   1. How to update your iPhone, iPad, or iPod Touch
   2. iPhone Support
   3. iPod Touch Support
   4. iPad Support
     a. Updating Your iOS to Version 6.0.x from iOS 5
          Tap Settings > General > Software Update
     If an update is available there will be an active Update button. If you are current,
     then you will see a gray screen with a message saying your are up to date.
     b. If you are still using iOS 4 — Updating your device to iOS 5 or later.
     c. Resolving update problems
        1. iOS - Unable to update or restore
        2. iOS- Resolving update and restore alert messages

Is it possible to make a high res. DVD slide show that can be viewed with blue ray player/HDTV that retains high res. quality?

I have used PE 12 to make slide shows on DVD but the quality is just not there when I view on HDTV. Is there a way to accomplish this using Premiere Elements and Photoshop Elements 12?

salrgrl
Assuming that you are going to use the Elements Organizer Slideshow 12/12.1 as the sole builder of the slideshow and Premiere Elements 12/12.1 just for the burn to AVCHD on DVD disc....
1. Before you start, open Premiere Elements 12/12.1 to its Expert workspace. Go to File Menu/New/Project and Change Settings.
In Change Settings, set the project preset to NTSC/DSLR/1080p/DSLR [email protected]. OK out of there.
In the New Project dialog that appears, rename the project and put a check mark "Force Selected Project Settings on This Project". OK out of there.
Minimize the program and do your Elements Organizer slideshow work.
1. Build your slideshow in the Elements Organizer Slideshow Editor with photos with a 16:9 frame aspect ratio. If you can get away with pixel dimensions of over 1920 x 1080 and avoiding pre-cropping/resizing, then just make sure the frame aspect ratio = 16:9. If your photos are 3:2 or 4:3, then cropping to 16:9 before they get into the Elements Organizer. The question is whether the transfer from Elements Organizer to Premiere Elements is going to be influenced by photos oversized for the 1920 x 1080 16:9 project. If a problem, then we may have to back track and crop resize to 16:9 1920 x 1080. The photos are going to end up at 1920 x 1080 away in encoding.
Please go with the Crop to Fit Slide as shown in the screenshot - will not compromise the goal here.
2. When you are ready to send the Elements Organizer Slideshow to Premiere Elements for the burn to AVCHD on DVD....
a. Save the slideshow as a Slide Show Project to the Elements Organizer.
b. In the Elements Organizer, select the slideshow's Slide Show Project thumbnail, and then Share Menu/Burn Video DVD/Blu-Ray.
c. When you do that, your slideshow will be in a Movie Menu/Publish+Share areas of the program which has the pre-set manually wanted project preset.
The workflow choice was made since your intention was to use Premiere Elements just for the burn to AVCHD on DVD disc.
3. Publish+Share
Disc
AVCHD
with Presets =
The presets is going to be the one that will give you the best results.
First, look at Presets = H.264 1920 x 1080pNTSC Dolby....the one with the 23.976 progressive frame rate.
Second, look at Presets = H.264 1920 x 1080iNTSC Dolby...the one with the 29.97 interlaced frame rate.
The first choice in this particular case was made to be consistent with the Premiere Elements project preset
that you set manually at the beginning to
NTSC/DSLR/1080p/DSLR [email protected].
And, that was done since there are many reports that this project preset results in sharper images in the burn to products when
all photos are involved in the slideshow.
Please review and consider, and then we can decide if the above looks like it going to meet your expectations for viewing.
Thanks for considering the above.
ATR

Is it possible to create a script to produce a high res and low res pdf and jpeg from Indesign at the same time

Hi, I'm just wondering if there is a way to automate a long process I have to do to create assets for my job.
I have a single page InDesign 6 file which I have to output three ways:
A low res pdf without bleed or trims
A high res pdf with bleed and trims
A low res jpeg downsized to 2% of original size.
If anyone knows if this is possible I'd love to hear from you.
Thanks in advance

Automation requires creating your own IDML script for output. Scroll down on this page to the section on Scripting resources. The text is a bit confusing. It says InDesign CS5 Scripting resources, but then the paragraph for that section says the PDF files are for CS6. I haven't read through these, I just found them by searching for "indesign automation". It does say in part that is can be used for preparing files for printing, so once you figure it out, it should be a single click option to do all three steps.
You can do them now with the menus you have, assuming you also have Acrobat Pro installed. With any document open, choose File > Adobe PDF Presets, and choose either from the prebuilt defaults, or create your own in the Distiller. However, I don't see a way in the Distiller settings to choose whether or not to include bleed and marks, so I'm not really sure how you'd have them on for one and not the other. As far as JPEG output, that can be chosen under Export. You get a choice to set a resolution and JPEG quality level, but not a size, so the output will be the dimensions of the document.

How to I get high res thumbnail images?

Just discovered once I've imported images into my library Aperture 3.2.2 (running under 10.7.3) doesn't render high res thumbnail images (when the Browser Thumbnail Resize slider is set to the far right/maximum), even though my "Previews" preference settings are as follows:
"Use embedded JPEG from camera when possible" is unchecked
"Don't Limit" for Photo Preview is selected
Photo Preview quality set to 10
Deleting and regenerating thumbnails doesn't solve the issue. However, if I delete the photo from the referenced library, then reimport the image, the browser thumbnail image renders sharp. The low res thumbnail is at left; high res thumbnail (after re-import) is at right. Both thumbnails images are sharp when the Browser Thumbnail Resize slider is positioned in the middle. Photos render sharp in the Viewer, regardless.
Going back through my images, it seems Aperture stopped providing a sharp thumbnail image since around July 2010. Other than updating Aperture, my workflow or supported camera hasn't changed. Couldn't find a reference to this issue in the User Manual. Am I missing something a setting somewhere?
Thanks,
Eric

Its unclear if the command Generate Thumbnails actually does anything if the thumbs already exist and as there isn;t a Delete Thumbnails command like there is a Delete preview command there are only two ways to force a new thumb to be generated.
One is to import the image again and two is to delete the Thumbnail folder in the Aperture library. I don;t know for sure if this will fix you problem but as I said it is the only way to force the generation of the thumbs.
If you try this make sure you have a good working backup of the library. Nothing here will normally cause data loss but it is always a good idea before messing with the library.
Quit Aperture, Highlight the library in the Finder and right click, Select show package contents. One fo the folders you'll see is Thumbnails, delete it. Open Aperture.
Also be aware that the regeneration of the thumbs will take some time. Depending on the size of the library it could be an all day affair. Aperture is usable while this is going on but it will be slower.

Need to split one large high-res video into sub-parts

I have a very large high-res video (5760 x 3240) that I would like to split into 9 separate videos, each 1920 x 1080. These would make up the content of a 3x3 video wall and would be 'stitched' back together by the media players driving the wall.
I am new to After Effects, so sorry if this sounds like a dumb question, but I was told this was possible using AE.

Thanks for all the responses.
My next question was how I can make sure I am positioning the video in the composition to the exact pixel. Seems a little inexact just dragging, but I will try the advanced sizing controls.
I am being told that the individual media players can sync up to the ms. We are going to test everything this week once we receive the final video. Since the entire video will be 60gb, there is the question of storage, so we are adding 64gb flash to each player.
We are doing a similar wall in Europe and they are using a single video server along with a matrixer to get the job done.
I've done 2x2 walls pixel perfect and most hardware will choke on that, so I am hoping the multiple media players will be better in handling smaller chunks.
I will let you know how it works out.

Using Quartz debug to take high res screenshots?

I have version 10.7.5 and can't change the UI resolution. Anyone know what do to?

Hi, yes I know that but since I was the Quartz debug is in the developer tools is I didnt know where else to go, I have heard from someone else though and apparently its not possible to take high res screenshots in later versions. Thanks for your help though.

How to keep high res when I create a pdf from Publisher doc

I created a pdf from a Publisher document, and the resolution is less than 300 dpi (about 500KB). The 1/2 page document is over 4MG as a Publisher document, so why did I lose resolution & what can I do to keep the resolution above 300?
I tried 3 different ways, "print," "press" and "print PowerPoint." Is it simply the fact I'm using the online trial?

>Well, Aandi, I create the original images in Harvard Graphics and then print the HG file to a pdf using the Acrobat Distiller. The onscreen and printed graphic images in the pdf look pixelated along the edges--i.e., not as sharp as in the original.
Ok. Are these transparent graphics i.e. with ragged edges, or just
rectangular graphics?
>
>When I called Customer Service/Sales to ask about v.9 allowing for higher res screen/print images, he checked with somebody and told me that the highest res. is 600 dpi.
I don't know why they said that. It's nonsense. Acrobat can store
images at very high resolution, though 600 dpi is considered an
enormous resolution, far higher than is needed for almost all
practical purposes. Do not confuse printer resolution with image
resolution: you don't try to match them together.
For example, a coffee table book with high quality pictures was
probably typeset on a 4000 dpi imagesetter, and the photos are
probably around 300 dpi.
>
>I'm using v.5. I'm willing to upgrade if there is a reason to do so.
There are many possible reasons but higher resolutions isn't one of
them. What Distiller settings are you using for compression?
Aandi Inston

Export/Save as High-Res Jpeg

Is there a way to export a document @ a different resolution than 72DPI? I know I can set the horizontal/vertical scale to save it at a larger dimension at 72DPI, but I need the file to be actual size and 300DPI.
This is part of a larger process, and I'd prefer to do the entire process from Illustrator, and not have to open the files in Photoshop to change the size/resolution.
Also, is it possible to change the color mode to CMYK or Greyscale for the exported Jpeg?

Thanks again, I checked the Javascript reference for CS6, and don't see any 'app.system' method listed, and I get 'app.system is not a function' when I try test it. That sounds like it would do what I wanted if available. I could probably add a call to run it from Bridge into my script, but one of my goals is to not run any additional applications if possible.
The main application is written in XOJO (formerly RealStudio), and is a very large program which handles a lot of aspects of project management for my position. This particular function was originally written as a separate Javascript to save out barcodes from a supplier's illustrator file. It has expanded and been incorporated into the application so it now stores the saved barcodes (EPS) into a database, as well as does some other processing after the files are saved. I am currently trying to add a high-res jpeg into the database as well, and would prefer to do so when the original EPS files are saved. Another part of the application can create the jpegs from Photoshop, but I'd prefer to do everything from within Illustrator.
I've got it mostly working for now, just have to deal with an issue with the file paths returned from the jpegs not being recognized properly.

High Res image in photoshop cs5

This may seem a simple issue , but i want to make a picture that is 140mm by 170mm using an existing hi res image , i've put the sizes into a new document in ps.
I then dragged the high res photo i need into photshop, the photo is 6144pxl by 4113pxl so is very large, but when i drag it to PS it goes really small about a quarter of the size of the new document template, i then drag the image to to my new correct sized document template but i have to enlarge it , which in turn makes it go blurred.
What am i doing wrong? i thought that as it is so big i would have to make it smaller to fit and it would be easy?
I hope you can help me
Regard's
Craig

It is a physical problem that is very easy to understand. The image below represent the letter o drawn using 3x3 pixels. Can you draw it on less than 3x3 pixels and still be recognizable?
While this is an exaggerated example and if displayed with the size of monitor pixels the letter won't be legible anyway because of the tiny size, the example shows the nature of the problem. The characters in a font have details that need a certain number of pixels to be displayed as intended. When using editable text, if the number of pixels available for the display of the font is low then the font technology uses a trick called font hinting which optimizes the font for smaller sizes and this is not possible if you text is rasterized and not editable.

Is Motion or After Effects best for animation of High res. photographs

Hi everyone. I’m a novice when it comes to Motion, having worked more with FCP, and I am encountering some confusing differences!
I’m making an animation from a high res. Scanned ‘photograph’ of a flower, and I hope to maintain the great image quality, plus working with a short sound file (breathing) as a guide for the movement. (The final output is going to be large scale projection using a HD projector, which I understand is 1920 x 1080, with smaller versions for pre-view purposes.)
The move to Motion from FCP has phased me (co-decs, pre-sets etc.. so many options) I could re-size it to suit, DV, HD or most of the ‘sizes’ supported by Motion but I’m lost as to which settings would be best for my purposes.
I have done various tests with different pre-sets and have found that the longer and more complex the animation gets, the more jittery the playback is. I am wondering if there is a way I can work with Motion that resolves the the perforamnce thing, or if what I am doing ( length and size of animation) would be more suited to After Effects.
I love Motion, esp. the language used in the manual and would prefer to stay with it.
Thanking you all. I really want to understand this whole ‘video’ to ‘still-image’ move I’m making.

First of all, you could do your video in either program and would likely get similar results (depending on your relative skill in each program). There's certainly no reason not to stay in Motion if you're happy with the interface. After Effects has just as many confusing settings as Motion when it comes to output so you're probably not going to feel any better there.
Considering your output, I would start your project with the Broadcast HD preset. That will give you the 1920x1080 frame size which should look great on your projected screen. I would tend always to work in an HD framework when working with stills since typically they'll be of high quality.
Make sure your stills are prepped properly for video (which is different from how they would be scanned for print work). Scan them in at a good size resolution 2500 px along the longest side at 72 dpi (high dpi is not necessary for video work). Also, use uncompressed pic formats like TGA, TIF, or PSD.
You didn't mention how long the sequence was, and length does make a difference at times because Motion is run primarily through the graphics card as opposed to the processor. This is a primary difference between Motion and AE.
When you are talking about jittery playback, keep in mind that it's the gfx card that is providing the "real-time" playback to begin with. So the larger the project, the less likely that the card is going to be able to play back in real-time. If timing is an issue you can change the view to draft (default is normal), or you can do a RAM preview (CMD+R). AE has NO real-time playback without a RAM preview, so keep that in mind.
One more thing. There are several ways to do the same thing in Motion. Some of them put more pressure on the card than others. Keep your project as simplified as you can while working, and turn off things like thumbnails and previews to speed up performance.
Good luck,
Andy

Please help, noisy phone line think its a high res...

HI,
Just moved in and phone line / bt broadband was activated a week ago. Phone master socket is OpenReach branded.
I have the BT supplied broadband filter fitted directly to the test socket (just the adsl router and a single phone connected).
Using the 17070 quiet line test , i have varying volumes on hissing and noise on the phone. This varies between loud and intrusive (difficult to hear callers) to fairly quiet. This seemed to be better during the cold weather over last weekend, but is worse again this morning.
I can also hear adsl connection noise when the router was connecting, depsite being through the adsl filters. This lead me to find threads related to High resistance faults whcih I think may apply to me.
BT online fault test shows no fault found.
Adsl Stats:
I was supplied with a home hub 3A
Connection Information
Line state: Connected
Connection time: 0 days, 21:29:11
Downstream: 3.625 Mbps
Upstream: 448 Kbps
ADSL Settings
VPI/VCI: 0/38
Type: PPPoA
Modulation: G.992.1 Annex A
Latency type: Interleaved
Noise margin (Down/Up): 10.6 dB / 15.0 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up): 32.2 dB / 16.0 dB
Output power (Down/Up): 19.9 dBm / 12.4 dBm
FEC Events (Down/Up): 2941 / 325
CRC Events (Down/Up): 12 / 45
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
HEC Events (Down/Up): 79 / 30
Error Seconds (Local/Remote): 8 / 22
1. Product name: BT Home Hub
2. Serial number:
3. Firmware version: Software version 4.7.5.1.83.8.57.1.3 (Type A) Last updated Unknown
4. Board version: BT Home Hub 3.0A
5. ADSL uptime: 0 days, 21:31:21
6. Bandwidth: 448 / 3712
7. Data sent/received: 0.3 / 2.7
8. Broadband username: [email protected]
9. BT FON: Yes
10. Wireless network/SSID: BTHub3-KC3K
11. Wireless connections: Enabled, (802.11 b/g/n (Recommended)) 20 MHz
12. Wireless security: WPA and WPA2
13. Wireless channel: Automatic / 1
14. Firewall: Default
15. MAC Address:
16. VPI/VCI: 0 / 38
17. Line profile: Interleaved
18. Software variant: -
19. Boot loader: -
The home hub doesn't seem too good at keeping the sync, speed drops regularly and it maintains a high SNR.
My previous router was a Thomson Speedtouch 780, which provides a higher sync and much better stability. Presumably this is due to the broadcom chipset (would a home hub 3b also be better?)
Speedtouch stats from this morning:
speedtouch 4/12/12 08:45
DSL Connection
Link Information
Uptime: 1 day, 10:39:46
Modulation: G.992.1 annex A
Bandwidth (Up/Down) [kbps/kbps]: 448 / 5.120
Data Transferred (Sent/Received) [MB/MB]: 24,94 / 119,27
Output Power (Up/Down) [dBm]: 12,0 / 19,5
Line Attenuation (Up/Down) [dB]: 15,5 / 31,0
SN Margin (Up/Down) [dB]: 19,0 / 9,0
Vendor ID (Local/Remote): TMMB / TSTC
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Link (Remote): 0
Error Seconds (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
FEC Errors (Up/Down): 0 / 158.090
CRC Errors (Up/Down): 0 / 68
HEC Errors (Up/Down): 0 / 62
speedtouch 04/12/12 09:30
DSL Connection
Link Information
Uptime: 1 day, 11:25:26
Modulation: G.992.1 annex A
Bandwidth (Up/Down) [kbps/kbps]: 448 / 5.120
Data Transferred (Sent/Received) [MB/MB]: 28,90 / 129,91
Output Power (Up/Down) [dBm]: 12,0 / 19,5
Line Attenuation (Up/Down) [dB]: 15,5 / 31,0
SN Margin (Up/Down) [dB]: 19,0 / 4,5
Vendor ID (Local/Remote): TMMB / TSTC
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Link (Remote): 0
Error Seconds (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
FEC Errors (Up/Down): 0 / 171.051
CRC Errors (Up/Down): 0 / 68
HEC Errors (Up/Down): 0 / 62
As your can see theres a wide range in the SNR figures, although the speedtouch is much better at holding the sync and not dropping the speed.
Given the line attenuation at 31db, I would have expected a higher sync rate. The estimated line length of ~2.2km from kitz.co.uk seems to be about right.
Any advice appreciated, including how to report this fault to the right people.
Thanks
Jon

I'm suspecting that I will be getting billed for the last engineer visit ( as he couldn't find a fault and therefore said it must be my equipment). I can't afford to pay one fee let alone 2 if I report it again with the same result.
However since the visit, the occurrences of the intermittent noise on the line have been fewer and further between. This morning however, after listening to a 1571 message I heard more noise so I did a quiet line test to see. Initially the line was quiet, but then I heard some quit noise and then a ringing sound (like when you dial a number and it rings remotely) as if I had made a call. The "BT Quiet line message" cut in but I could still here the ringing underneath. I waited to see if I would be able to hear if someone answered but the ringing stopped after a while and I couldn't here a voice so I don't know if they answered or it rung off.
Is it possible my line is picking up the ring tone from another line?
Also, when the engineer arrived he initially said his test had shown a fault and that water must have got in somewhere. However when he removed my filter/phone/router from the test socket, his tests then showed no fault. Is it possible the fault only shows up when the adsl is active. Back when the line was first active I could the router negotiating (even thorough 2 filters) although this doesn't happen now.
Moving on to the adsl side of things, Currently my stats are:
DSL Connection
Link Information
Uptime: 0 days, 11:48:54
Modulation: G.992.1 annex A
Bandwidth (Up/Down) [kbps/kbps]: 448 / 5.440
Data Transferred (Sent/Received) [MB/MB]: 9,61 / 39,04
Output Power (Up/Down) [dBm]: 12,0 / 19,5
Line Attenuation (Up/Down) [dB]: 15,5 / 31,0
SN Margin (Up/Down) [dB]: 20,0 / 5,0
Vendor ID (Local/Remote): TMMB / TSTC
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Link (Remote): 0
Error Seconds (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
FEC Errors (Up/Down): 0 / 1.384
CRC Errors (Up/Down): 0 / 0
HEC Errors (Up/Down): 0 / 0
Interleaved.
With the BT Home hub (3a) the connection would drop peridocally, so I'm using my Thomson 780wl which hold the connection better and also shows less FEC errors than the HH.
I think the connection speed and the interlacing are poor given the line attenuation. The line length is about 2 - 2.5km, underground from the village to the exchange, overground to the house. No cabinets directly connected to exchange.
I've been monitoring signal to noise ratio and have noticed something odd:
This happens every day, in the same pattern. Its not interference from any internal wiring or appliances or heating etc. I understand that noise changes over time but this is a 5+ DB drop is this normal?
Any advice?

Linking High Res files back to FCPX project

Without Cinema Tools, can I still do an offline/low res edit with FCP X, but then relink to the high res 2K or 4K files for a final output? This would then be printed back to 35mm film. Anyone with experience in this work flow?
thank you for your time.

Thanks for your reply. Would this type of thing be possible with Avid Media Composer or the older Final Cut Pro 7?

.jpgs/.pngs no longer save as high res, previous high res .jpg/.pngs show up as medium res

I need some serious HELP! All of a sudden, without doing anything that I know of, my saved exported .jpgs/.pngs are no longer saving as high res. Also, when I pull up high res images (I know they are high res), they now show as medium res in Illustrator. I've used these program for a very long time, and I have no clue why this started a few days ago? I didn't even realize it was converting older files to medium res until today.
Any help would be most appreciated! I have never encountered this problem before, and I've created thousands of images for clients web/print.
Thanks so much!
T

Tara,
The following is a general list of things you may try when the issue is not in a specific file (you may have tried/done some of them already); 1) and 2) are the easy ones for temporary strangenesses, and 3) and 4) are specifically aimed at possibly corrupt preferences); 5) is a list in itself, and 6) is the last resort.
I believe 5) is least likely to be relevant.
1) Close down Illy and open again;
2) Restart the computer (you may do that up to 3 times);
3) Close down Illy and press Ctrl+Alt+Shift/Cmd+Option+Shift during startup (easy but irreversible);
4) Move the folder (follow the link with that name) with Illy closed (more tedious but also more thorough and reversible);
5) Look through and try out the relevant among the Other options (follow the link with that name, Item 7) is a list of usual suspects among other applications that may disturb and confuse Illy, Item 15) applies to CC, CS6, and maybe CS5);
Even more seriously, you may:
6) Uninstall, run the Cleaner Tool (if you have CS3/CS4/CS5/CS6/CC), and reinstall.
http://www.adobe.com/support/contact/cscleanertool.html

Is it possible to maintain a high res workflow on new iPad?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for