Issue in creating one invoice for 2 despatches

Hi all,
I have two export despatches and I want to create one invoice for both despatches. Now when I open VF01 and enter 2 despatches document nos, the system is creating 2 separate invoices because 'Number of foreign trade data field' is different in both despatches. Please respond how can i create one invoice in this case for 2 despatches.
Best Regards,
AI

Hi,
This field is in header data of billing document you can do as change the filed value to same as first doc. or change the data transfer requirment in copying control.
Gajanan Rudrakanthwar

Similar Messages

  • One invoice for multiple deliveries

    Hi Gurus,
    Can any one tell how can i create one invoice for multiple deliveries.
    Regards,
    Vinod

    one invoice for multiple delivers we can do in vf04
    we can do in vf04
    reward points if it is help ful
    Thanks
    mubeen
    Edited by: mahammad mubeen on Mar 5, 2008 10:02 AM

  • Issue in creating Credit Note for road carrier invoice from SAP TM system

    Dear All,
    I am facing issue in creating Credit Note for road carrier invoice from SAP TM system.
    The following steps I have performed:
    1)  
    1)    1) Create Freight order with Amount 20,100
    2)     2) Create Freight Settlement Doc and send it to ECC. Hence PO and SES will be created in ECC with Amount 20,100
    3)     3) Invoice verification (MIRO) done w.r.t. FO in ECC with Amount 20,100 and following entries posted :
    Carrier A/c - 20,100Cr
    GR/IR A/c – 20,100 Dr
    4)    4) Created Credit Note in SAP TM against freight order with Amount 1,010 and transfer it to SAP ECC.
    5)    5)  By this a new PO and SES was created with negative values (with amount 1,010) in SAP ECC
    6)    6)  In transaction MIRO, Credit Memo was created against the freight order.
    7)    7)  By this it is showing value 21,110 by adding the line items of Original Purchase Order and Credit Note Purchase Order as 20,100 and 1,010 respectively.
    8)    8)  By posting this following are the accounting entries which is not correct:
    Carrier A/c – 21,110 Dr
    GR/IR – 20,100 Cr
    GR/IR – 1,010 Cr
    9)    9)  In report FBL1N which is showing the remaining liability of value 1,010(21,100 – 20,100) instead of 19,090 (20,100-1,010=19,090) for the carrier.
    Please suggest how to resolve the issue and get the correct accounting for credit memo?
    Regards,
    Vibhu Gupta

    Hello,
    Like my reply in Linkedin group, I got the same issue and solved with BADI in TM side(REQREQ...).
    Regards, Marcelo Lauria

  • DMEE :More than one invoice for a vendor payment

    Hello Experts,
    I'm trying to create a file for payments to vendors  through transaction DMEE.
    I've create a new structure in DMEE, tree PAYM where given pace for atleast 4 invoices with semicloumn.
    but when I'm runing the payment run for more than one invoice for the same vendor, the file only shows the first one with repeation and filling all structurewith only 1st invoice.
    Issue is when payment run for a vendor for more than one invoices, only the first invoice has shown in the file.
    Sturcture of the file  coming after payment run is filled like this , pasting below for your referance.
    000000016000.0020080310             12025000003958560010000710200713      0072394000Spoerle Electronic Kft          HU010               INV.123452345434 ;INV.123452345434 ;INV.123452345434                000066                   
    INV.123452345434 is the 1st invoice.....whcih is entering one after the other instead of 2nd / 3rd invoice.
    Could you please help me?
    Thanks in advance!
    Nupur

    hi,
    i am also having same requirement.
    i have to send the payment advice details to the bank.
    for that i planned to create the settings in the DMEE.
    so plz send the steps which you are created for your requirement
    thanks ,
    Ramu

  • How  to create one delivery for two sales orders?

    Hi Experts,
    I need to create one delivery for two sales orders. But it fails.
    The route, shipping point, ship to party are same for both orders but INCOTERMS are different.
    Delivery date, Good issue date, loading date,material availability date, transportation planning date for 1st order is 12/07/11 and for second order is 14/07/11.
    I have created delivery on 14/07/2011 but the delivery is created for 1st order only, the second order is missing in the delivery.
    It not happened because of incorterms.? different dates
    Kindly help regarding this.
    Thanks
    Raghu

    Hi
    To understand splitting behavior, see SAP Note 546668 - FAQ: Delivery split when creating deliveries. And yes, incoterms happens.
    I think that with the help of question 6 you can try to force the merging of SO. Then, see SAP Note 166397 - Delivery split according to customer field ZUKRL, and handling the field ZUKRL in a VOFM in the copy rule I think that you can try to do it.
    Finally See  Note 4505 - Duprec when adding delivery (VL04, VL01, VL10*) to avoid problems while you are merging.
    Regards
    Eduardo

  • More than one invoice for a single material document

    Dear all,
    If a material document contains 10 items,while creating invoice in J1IS with reference to that material document.The system is generating one invoice for the first 8 items in the material doc.& one more invoice for the balance items.
    Is it possible to get all the 10items in a single invoice in J1IS.
    Kindly help us.
    Regards
    M.Sarathi

    Check the setting for max no of items allowed in the excise setting for excise transactions.

  • Help needed for creating 1 invoice for 2 different material types.

    Dear, Gurus
    I really need help here I have spent 3 days cracking my head trying to solve the problem. Problem is client was creating invoice with reference to order and while invoice was being made it would cause an invoice split. The materials involved are Trading Good and Service Material. They would like only 1 invoice. Note nothing was different except material group and item cat. of the material. payment terms billing dates partners everything is same.
    Current item config for Trading Good material is ZMPI-project item cat.
    Copying requirements   023  Item ord.ref. w/o AZ        Billing quantity     A
    Data VBRK/VBRP         000                                           Pos./neg. quantity   +
                                                                                    Pricing type         K
                                                                                    PricingExchRate type
                                                                                    Price source
    Current item config for service Material is TAD-Service
    Copying requirements   002  Item/order-related          Billing quantity     A
    Data VBRK/VBRP         001  Inv.split (sample)            Pos./neg. quantity   +
                                                                                    Pricing type         G
                                                                                    PricingExchRate type
                                                                                    Price source
    I was told to change Data VBRK/VBRP to 003 One Invoice which I did in both of these item cat. and yes they worked perfectly but at time of creating the invoice for service material the qty that showed was 11. Note: In sales order it is 1 qty. So I went back into the config of item cat TAD and changed copying requirement to 023 instead of 002 but nothing changed. Seems a qty of 10 is referencing something else which I have no idea what or where it is picking this up from. Just to see or test things I went into the sales order and tried changing the service material qty then a weird popup appears and says service order 12344456 has been blocked. (Seriously I have no idea why this would happen or should be existing at all.) Even if for some reason it is being referenced the service order that is existing is qty 1.
    I really really do need help and if someone can help me that would be god sent.
    Regards, Ali

    You did not mention what value is maintained in the field billing quantity in the copy control->Item settings. Check for the service item, what value is assigned. Put value A and re-test.
    Note that whenever you change any settings in configuration side, you need to create a new documents to test the results of the settings. You should not use the existing documents.
    When you say the document is blocked, then check the status of the sales order to find the reason for blocking (like credit block, approval etc)..
    Regards,

  • Error in Creating Excise Invoice for Factory Sale

    Dear Friends:
    Using T.code J1IIN ( Create Excise invoice for Factory Sale), I entered data for billing doc,posting date,sub transaction type & pressed enter and tried to save it.I got the error 'Error in allocating internal document number interval not found number object J_1IINTNUM'.
    Using T.code J1I9, I used the number object J_1IINTNUM and created number ranges and again tried to save T.code J1IIN ( Create Excise invoice for Factory Sale), but still i am getting the same error.
    Please let me know how to solve the error. This will be highly Appreciated.
    Srinu NV

    Hi,
    In Excise Invoice, there is always an internal number range which is required to be maintained. This is maintained through Transaction Code: SNRO & object being J_1IINTNUM . As soon as you maintain the same, it will resolve the error.
    I learned the above by commiting a same mistake in one of the project.
    Regards,
    Rajesh Banka
    Reward points if helpful.

  • Is it better to create ONE form, for 25 different forms?

    We have a Telco Application (in Forms 10g) which has about 200 Forms which are called from the main menu. Out of that 200 forms about *25* are "file upload" type forms (shown below).
    http://www.freeimagehosting.net/alg6q
    As you can see this is small form. The functionality is as follows:
    *(a.)* Select a text file (which has data in tabular format) from the client PC.
    When file is selected, it is also copied to a directory in the DB server machine. File Name will show the full path of the file in the client machine.
    *(b.)* When user presses Load button, form calls a stored packaged procedure. In that we create a EXTERNAL table mapped to the file in the db directory and read the contents to a temporary table in the DB.
    *(c.)* When user presses Process button, the temporary table is read and our Telco tables are updated using this data.
    *(d.)* You can view the error records and correct records discovered while processing, with the View File option. This will display 2 Oracle reports.
    *(e.)* You can delete the temporary table contents using the Delete Temporary option.
    This story goes like this: Our application is in Forms 10g. Now, we want to upgrade this application to 11g Forms. One problem we encountered was the FileUploader bean which we use in the above forms. This does not work in 11g. Solution was found in using WebUtil. Now, we have to modify all 25 Forms (obviously).
    Now here comes the real important part: Our Managers think that in the future also we might have to do upgrade to these 25 forms (due to future problems/upgrades with WebUtil and so on) and they want us to create ONE form for the 25 forms. So, in that ONE form,
    (a.) We have a list box at the top where uses selects which upload function he wants.
    (b.) Then, the file is selected (and transferred to the DB directory).
    (c.) Now when the users presses Load button, we have to execute the load packaged procedure for the selected load file option.
    (d.) When he presses Process button we have to run the program unit for the selected file upload function.
    (e.) When user presses the View File button, he has to show the correct records and invalid records (found after processing) in 2 reports. The reports differ from function to function.
    (f.) He can delete the records in the temporary table using Delete Temp button.
    Is this is good idea?? My initial study tells me that it is not a good idea since we have one form with too much functionality. What are pros and cons of this approach and what is the best solution??
    Edited by: user12240205 on Jun 25, 2012 1:16 AM

    So the forms are completely different, and yet you are asked to stuff them all together into one form? What sense would that make? That's like pulling forms which are using text_io together just because when text_io is changed you simply would need to edit one form. Well of course you would have to. On the other hand there is a pile of code necessary to seperate the parts you glued together in the first place plus the effort of pulling all those forms together plus the effort of adding stuff to one "part" of the form.
    Also think about version control: you'd create more frequent conflicts in putting those forms together when different developers edit different parts of the form. Conflicts causes work as developers are forced to merge more often plus developers can make errors when merging their changes. Also the log of your version control system becomes quite useless as it always will be the xyz form which is changed. If you would want to know what did change you would have to read the log messages carefully of each revission (given the fact that developers wrote them carefully) or do diffs between revisions instead of...looking at what files changed.
    And all that just because the only thing they have in common is that they are using webutil?!? Do your managers keep their Blue Socks and their Blue Cars in the same drawer because they are blue?
    If the issue here is that you need to edit many forms and this might cause errors then you should take a look at the JDAPI, because this would be the tool to do changes in forms in batch. The forms migration assistant can also be configured to change one built-in into another, and you wouldn't have to write one line of java code. But stuffing forms together because they use the same built-ins...I'd say no, but of course this is just my opinioin ;)
    btw.:
    When you say API, u mean a PLL, right???Not only, by API I meant Application programming interface; this might be a package in a library, a whole pll file, a database package, a java class, or a combination of all those.
    cheers

  • Create Excise invoice for Factory Sale problem

    Dear Friends:
    Using T.code J1IIN ( Create Excise invoice for Factory Sale), I entered data for billing doc,posting date,sub transaction type & pressed enter and tried to save it.I got the error 'Error in allocating internal document number interval not found number object J_1IINTNUM'.
    Using T.code J1I9, I used the number object J_1IINTNUM and created number ranges and again tried to save T.code J1IIN ( Create Excise invoice for Factory Sale), but still i am getting the same error.
    Please let me know how to solve the error.Please explain in detail.This will be highly Appreciated.
    Thanks
    Sridhar

    Hi Sridhar,
    Can you please let me know whether your issue is resolved. If yes, Can you please specify the solution.
    I am facing the same error now and I am not able to figure out the reason for it.
    Regards,
    Srinu NV

  • Creating excise invoice for delivery at depot

    Hi SAP Guru,
    i am facing an error while creating  excise invoice for delivery at depot. The error is You are not authorized to create
    Message no. 8I465 Trans Code J1IJ
    I had transfer the stock by ME27
    Delivery by VL10G And VL02n
    Proforma  invoce VF01
    Excise invoice  J1IIN
    Excise invoice at DEpot by J1IG
    still i am facing the problem in creating excise invoice for delivery at depot by J1IJ
    Pl Guide me where i am wrong
    Regards
    Hemu

    Hii..
    Contact your basis buys it seems that you are having authorization problem.
    Regards,
    Aakash Kehralia

  • How to create one delivery for multiple sales order

    Hi!! Friends,
    Can some one explain the steps to be followed in creating one delivery for multiple sales order in SAP SD.
    Regards
    AKASH
    Message was edited by:
            AKASH TAMBI

    Hi.,
                  You can combine different orders in to one delivery ,But for the customer Order combination should be checked in  the sales area data of the shipping tab,we can combine orders but the ship to party,Route,Inco terms,Shipping date,shipping point should be same,you can do in T.code VL04 & VL10
    REWARD if helpfull
    Thanks & Regards
    Narayana

  • How to create one TO for multiple TRs

    Dear All,
    how to create one TO for multiple TRs, kindly suggest me
    Regards,
    balu

    As for your question: it is discussed in sAP online help:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/c6/f841f24afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    Sorry I misunderstood your question.
    The above mentioned solution won't create one single TO from multiple TR.
    Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Aug 11, 2010 9:46 AM

  • How to create one checksum for 264 vis

    Hi,
    How to create "one Checksum" for 264 Vis.These 264 Vis are Interlinked if i change code for any .vi the checksum Should be update.This checksum is shown on the main window.
    Regards
    Ravindranath
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Here's a slightly simplified version (saved in 8.6).  There's no need for the Get/Set File Position.  The file position is already being incremented with the read.
    There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
    Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
    Attachments:
    Multiple File MD5 Checksum (Version 8.6).vi ‏23 KB

  • Need to create one TO for multiple SU's

    Hi All,
    I want to create a single TO for multiple Storage units. where destination storage bin and type will remain same for all.
    Is it possible in standard SAP..
    To create one TO for an SU L_TO_CREATE_MOVE_SU can be used..
    I tried using L_TO_CREATE_MULTIPLE for my reqmnt but its nt working as expected.
    Please help

    You might want to try asking this on a forum that specific to your database. I suspect the answer can vary depending on the database and probably requires in depth knowledge of what the database does.

Maybe you are looking for