Issue in creation of GL masters

Dear experts,
I am having an issue in creation of General Ledger Master Record. We have three company codes and all are using the same chart of accounts. Some of the General Ledgers are being used only by one company code and not by other twos. So I need to create them to the corresponding company code only. But, If I create one ledger master in one company code through FS00, the same ledger master is automatically getting created in other company codes also. Normally if we create any ledger master through FSP0 i.e., only Chart of Accounts segment, the company code segment should not get created. But in my case, both chart of account segment as well as company code segment also getting created.
If any one of you know the solution, please post it here. I will be so thankful to you.
Thanks and regards
Vijaya Kumar S

I tried to create the Chart of Account segment only with FSP0. But that time also the general ledger master created to all the company codes with company code segment. It is taking the company code segment settings of another General Ledger master which was created in the same account group. But generally, if we create the Chart of Account segment, it must create only the chart of account segment and not the company code level segment.
It is working fine in testing and development client. But in the production client only I am getting this kind of problem.

Similar Messages

Issue in Creation of XML file from ABAP data

Hi,
I need to create a XML file, but am not facing some issues in creation of XML file, the in the required format.
The required format is
-<Header1 1st field= u201CValueu201D 2nd field= u201CValueu201D>
   - <Header2 1st field= u201CValueu201D 2nd field= u201CValueu201Du2026u2026. Upto 10 fields>
          <Header3 1st field= u201CValueu201D 2nd field= u201CValueu201Du2026u2026. Upto 6 fields/>
          <Header4 1st field= u201CValueu201D 2nd field= u201CValueu201Du2026u2026. Upto 4 fields/.>
           <Header5 1st field= u201CValueu201D 2nd field= u201CValueu201Du2026u2026. Upto 6 fields/>
      </Header2>
   </Header1>
Iu2019m using the call transformation to convert ABAP data to XML file.
So please anybody can help how to define XML structure in transaction XSLT_TOOL.
And one more thing, here I need to put the condition to display the Header 3, Header 4, Header 5 values. If there is no record for a particular line item in header 3, 4 & 5, I donu2019t want to display full line items; this is only for Header 3, 4 & 5.
Please help me in this to get it resolved.

Hello,
you can use CALL TRANSFORMATION id, which will create a exact "print" of the ABAP data into the XML.
If you need to change the structure of XML, you can alter your ABAP structure to match the requirements.
Of course you can create your own XSLT but that is not that easy to describe and nobody will do that for you around here. If you would like to start with XSLT, you´d better start the search.
Regards Otto

Issue In Creation Licence.

Dear All,
I got The Issue In Creation of License as " Enter valid SP/SH ".
Even I have Maintained Prefix Zeros.
Here SP and SH both are Different, If I enter SP and SH as same system accepts, if not error is triggered.
Both SP and SH maintained Customer Excise details.
Please give me your suggestions.
Regards,
Siva krishna B
<Text removed by Moderator for sharing personal details>
Message was edited by: Jyoti Prakash

Hi
Assign Ship to party code to the Corresponding Sold to party in customer master under Partner function Tab
and Create the New License then system will accept

Issue in creation of data from extended segment in background mode

Dear all,
I am facing an issue in creation of data in receiving system using IDOC for an xtended matmas segment(Extended for classification view in user exit).The issue is that the idoc is received successfully in r3eceiving system but not created successfuly in data base .(Though it is shown green/successful).When i execute this from we19 the data is created successfuly in data base.I will be thankful if you can guide me resolve issue.
Thanks.

Hello,
you can use CALL TRANSFORMATION id, which will create a exact "print" of the ABAP data into the XML.
If you need to change the structure of XML, you can alter your ABAP structure to match the requirements.
Of course you can create your own XSLT but that is not that easy to describe and nobody will do that for you around here. If you would like to start with XSLT, you´d better start the search.
Regards Otto

APO-MD - Mass Creation of Product Masters in APO.

I have need to create about 100,000 product masters in APO. The product master general data does exist as it has been CIFed over from R/3. However these need to be mass extended to several customer locations.
I am looking for any advice on tools/programs that will allow mass creation of Product masters in APO.

The Functiona Loader did mass create products but the product model assignment did not work even though the model number was mapped in the loader.
Did I miss something in the process.
Is there another way to mass assign products and model.

Issue in creation of plant related data at receiving server using BD10

Hi all,
This is regarding Material master creation using B10.I am using MATMAS05 message type for sending data from one system to another.Data is sent and received successfully.When i go in mm03 i can see all the views created successfully accept views related to PLANT.Please guide to resolve the issue.
When i entered into Log-
1)"The field MBEW-BKLAS is defined as a required field; it does not contain an entry".
2)"No material master data exists for material AB_08.04.09(30) in plant 4001".
My segemnt is as follows-
ZMATMAS05                      matmas05
       E1MARAM                        Master material general data (MARA)
           Z1KLART                        KLART----
My extention
           E1MARA1                        Additional Fields for E1MARAM
           E1MAKTM                        Master material short texts (MAKT)
           E1MARCM                        Master material C segment (MARC)
               Z1AUSPM                        E1AUSPMDistribution of Classification:----
My extention
               E1MARC1                        Additional Fields for E1MARCM
               E1MARDM                        Master material warehouse/batch segment (MARD)
               E1MFHMM                        Master material production resource/tool (MFHM)
               E1MPGDM                        Master material product group
               E1MPOPM                        Master material forecast parameter
               E1MPRWM                        Master material forecast value
               E1MVEGM                        Master material total consumption
               E1MVEUM                        Master material unplanned consumption
               E1MKALM                        Master material production version
           E1MARMM                        Master material units of measure (MARM)
           E1MBEWM                        Master material material valuation (MBEW)
           E1MLGNM                        Master material material data per warehouse number (MLGN)
           E1MVKEM                        Master material sales data (MVKE)
           E1MLANM                        Master material tax classification (MLAN)
           E1MTXHM                        Master material long text header
           E1CUCFG                        CU: Configuration data
       E1UPSLINK                      Reference from Object to Superior UPS
Thanks.
Edited by: sanu debu on Apr 27, 2009 7:10 PM

CREATE CONTROLFILE SET DATABASE "NEWDB" NORESETLOGS ARCHIVELOGAlso when you are setting a new database, the option should be RESETLOGS and not NORESETLOGS.
'D:\APP\ADMINISTRATOR\ORADATA\NEWDB\ONLINELOG\O1_MF_2_7FK0XKB8_.LOG
D:\APP\ADMINISTRATOR\ORADATA\NEWDB\DATAFILE\O1_MF_SYSTEM_7FK0SKN0_.DBFWhy underscore(_) at the end of the datafile name. Any specific reason ?

Issue in Creation of new Value Field in CO-PA

Hi,
I have a query in CO-PA Value Field Linking.
In my Development Client,
1. Created a New Value Field (No Transport Request Generated)
2. Linked to the above to new Conditon type created in SD. (Tranport request was generated) i.e. in Flow of Actual Values->Transfer of Billing Documents->Assign Value Fields
However then i try creating a new Value Field in my Production Client it throws a message 'You have no authorization to change Fields".
Is this an issue with authorization or i need to transport the Value field too from Development to Production client.
Please Advise.
Thanks in Advance,
Safi

Thanks Phaneendra for the response.
The creation of Value field did not create any tranportation request. Will this too be transported if i transport the Operating Concern.
Please Advise.
Thanks,
Safi

Issue in creation of control cycle

Dear Gurus,
During creation of control cycle (LPK1), the fields for source information is not appearing in my system.
I compared control cycle in a different ECC system where source information is appearing.
How can make the screen appear in my ECC system.
Please find the screenshots.
Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
This thread is further to the threads in Production Planning and LE/WM Forum. I could not resolve the issue with the threads.
Hope that I will get any pointer in EWM forum.
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3609441
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3610822
With Regards,
Malay

Hello Malay,
Can first contact your ABAPer and ensure the bottom screen is not an Screen Enhancement?
If it is a some custom development, your ABAPer can help you on the logic behind it.
Else, Let us know.
Regards,
Sathish

Issue during creation of control cycle

Dear Gurus,
During creation of control cycle (LPK1), the fields for source information is not appearing in my system.
I compared control cycle in a different ECC system where source information is appearing.
How can make the screen appear in my ECC system.
Please find the screenshot.
Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
This thread is further to the thread in Production Planning Forum
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3609441
With Regards,
Malay

Manish,
I do not understand how this going to solve the issue because why we need both KANBAN and WM control cycles for one material withdrawal for production?
Br
KK

Issue in creation of Mailform

Hi,
I tried to create the mailform in the IC Manager role and getting the below issue (We are having CRM 7.0).
First I filled the ID, Desc, Attribute Context=ERMS and Subject.
Then I I placed the cursor in the Text element to enter the body of email.
But nothing is capturing there and at the left hand side bottom corner, Iam seeing DONE is blicking continuously.
When I have IE7.0, I created many mailforms without this issue. Currently I have IE8.0.
Is there is something which I need to do for sucessful creation of mail form.
pl suggest
Regards
BABU.

I tried to create the Chart of Account segment only with FSP0. But that time also the general ledger master created to all the company codes with company code segment. It is taking the company code segment settings of another General Ledger master which was created in the same account group. But generally, if we create the Chart of Account segment, it must create only the chart of account segment and not the company code level segment.
It is working fine in testing and development client. But in the production client only I am getting this kind of problem.

Issue in Creation of shipment with events using BAPI_SHIPMENT_CREATE

Hello experts,
I am trying to create shipments using BAPI_SHIPMENT_CRETAE for which data is provided in an excel.
The issue here is I have to create the events in shipment i.e., I need to fill the Further dates tab. But in this BAPI there is no such structure or field which can take the input and create an entry in this tab. Please let me know if we can do this using this BAPI .
Also let me know if there are any other bapi's for shipment creation or the only way is to go for BDC.
Thanks.

Hi,
The BAPI_SHIPMENT_CREATE can't upload further dates, partners etc.
You can try below options.
1. Use BAPI to create basic shipment and update further dates data through BDC(VT02)
2. Create shipment using BDC(VT01)
Regards
Praveen

Issues during creation and maintenance of BOM using FM's

I am facing problems while using FM's BAPI_MATERIAL_BOM_GROUP_CREATE , CSAP_MAT_BOM_CREATE .
   Previously i was using CSAP_MAT_BOM_CREATE but it did not support creation of another alternative bom if there already exists one for the same material,plant,usage.
   So i started using BAPI_MATERIAL_BOM_GROUP_CREATE. This bapi supports creation of alternative BOM's but i have a requirement that i need to create items with a specific item id.
   The Bapi's interface has a item table which has a field item_id which i am filling up but internally this bapi converts it into a structure using FM 'MAP2I_BAPI1080_ITM_C_TO_ITM_CL.'
   But this FM does not transfer the item_id from the bapi's structure into the internal structure field ident. The FM being called from this bapi for creating items - CS_CL_S_ITM_CREATE uses this ident field for updating item id in an item but this field is empty.Do you have any idea how this issue can be resolved ?
   Also similar to BAPI_MATERIAL_BOM_GROUP_CREATE i was not able to find a BAPI for changing an existing BOM.Currently i am using CSAP_MAT_BOM_MAINTAIN.
   Can anyone please help me out with these issues .

To enable and protect the variant maintenance of a report, it needs an S_PROGRAM group on it (see report RSCSAUTH).
Via S_PROGRAM p_action = 'VARIANT' those users can then maintain the variants AND also submit the reports via report trees or transactions (including SA38 for example).
To make the variant user specific for maintaining it but not restricting the ability to use it, take a look in transaction VARCH at the "Protection" flag (this is user specific then, for the current user who sets the flag first).
Also see the SAP notes and discussions here about report RSVARENT - for globally unlocking the protection (to be used and protected itself with caution).
To lock them down beyond the reach of the user's normal authority, you can also create custom system variants in client 000.
Cheers,
Julius
Edited by: Julius Bussche on Jan 13, 2009 6:07 PM

ATD Check Issue in creation TLB Order Manually in Planning Book.

Hi ,
I am facing issue in ATD Check in TLB Interactive Planning while creating TLB Order Manually.
Here goes scenario.
I am creating TLB Order Manually in TLB Planning Book with below Information.
Demand Date u2013 02.01.2012 ( Todayu2019s date ) & Qty u2013 20
Considering Lead Time of 10 Days to supply from Plant to Depot, Delivery Date in Purchase Order is calculated as 12.01.2012
Now I do outbound delivery for this PO in ECC. As client is not using Routes Transit Times functionalities, Planned Goods Issue Date for Outbound Delivery in ECC is calculated as Delivery Date from PO which is 12.01.2012 minus Transit Time in Route which is maintained as 0. Hence Planned Goods Issue Date in ECC is 12.01.2012.
This is same as Requirement Date for Outbound Delivery. PGI for this delivery is yet to happen. When PGI is done then issue is resolved.
When this Delivery goes in APO, it has requirement date as 12.01.2012 and now when I create TLB Order in Interactive Planning Book manually it allows me to create TLB Order of 20 qty extra before populating below message
u201CThere is only an ATD quantity of XXX available for product GHECP02u201D
In short it allows me to create 20 extra PO as Outbound Delivery is shifted to future bucketu2019s and hence is not counted in ATD Issues.
I am using Daily Bucket Profile in TLB Planning Book.
If I use Monthly Bucket Profile my issue is solved but again when client is creating TLB Order , by default system picks first date of bucket which client does not want.
Is there any way where in I can avoid this excess PO Creation. When it checks ATD Availability it should consider these outbound deliveries which are of future dates.
Regards,
Sameer

Hi Sameer,
Such kind of issues would come when master data/transaction data in APO and R/3 are not in sync.
You could go in for some custom development for TLB orders, but it's like opening a pandora's box as you are messing with teh standard working of system. It could create data inconsistencies between APO and R/3 and I would not really advise this. It's best to maintain all the relevant master data/transaction between APO and R/3 in sync.
Better ask your client to maintain the relevant routes as required. Otherwise they should create PO directly in R/3 as required.
Thanks - Pawan

Issue for creation date of Billing document in third party ???

Hello SAP Folks,
This issue is related to third party scenario. The basic requirement is to create to a billing document with a creation date same as
Good issue date of Sales Order.
For your information, with the help of enhacement we have passed on the value of posting date of material document generated
from MIGO to Goods issue date in Sales Order. I am very much aware that setting up a new copying routine would help me but
relating the GI date field of Sales Order from the techincal point of view is a complete work stopper. Could anyone throw light on
the workaround for mapping this case ???
Regards,
Sarthak

Hello,
Thanks Alex for your input on the topic !!
But i would like to say that the billing relevance of the item category has to "B" as this process of Third part Sales talks about creation of billing document after the MIGO. And i am basically interested to Populated the posting date of MIGO for Biling creation date.
In Sales Order, the GI date is modified to Posting date of MIGO through enhancement. I have been looking around relevant tables to fetch the GI date of Sales Order but not getting the right track...
Could anyone provide any other workaround to implement this sort of requirement ???
Eager to hear from Lakshmipathi ...
Regards,
Sarthak

WM goods issue TO creation and TO confirmation understanding.

Dear all,
i am using WM in context of PP transactions.
my transaction flow is as below
CO01- PRODUCTION ORDER CREATION.
CO15- ORDER CONFIRMATION (AUTO GOODS ISSUE AND GR- SLOC- 00014 wm managed) IM is executing correctly for goods movemnt.
LB12- TO CREATION.
REQURIED help in understanding below scenario.
stock is available in storage bin 500 ea
created TO for both 101 and 261 TR
production order qnty 100 ea
TO created and if viewed stock in LS26 it showing available stock is zero, once i confirm TO remaining stock of 400 is shown.
my query is instead of 0 why it is not showing 400 before confirmation. 500 ea is shown in putaway after confirmation remaining stock is available
is any customizing remaining for same.

Hi manish,
pls find below details,
Scrn-1-toce- LS26        Stock available in sloc- 0015 - 49,984
                                                                 Putaway stock – 100,491
SCRN-2 TR number generated for GR and GI.
TO created with LB12
SCRN-3- .NOW before confirmation TO (LT12)checking goods issue stock it is ‘0’and
entire stock is moved to putaway stock.
Stock available in sloc- 0015 -    0
           Increased putaway stock - 150,455.
Due to this next TO is not created for 261 as stock is zero.

Issue in creation of GL masters

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for