Issue in mapping the same source and target fields

Hi All,
I am working on PI 7.0 and currently I am connecting to PI 7.0 via citrix desktop . Problem here is : in the mapping , direct mapping option that is available to map the same source and target fields is disabled . I do know that this is due to some java version issue .
What I want to know is there any possibilty of solving this issue without installing an updated java version ?
Regards
Vinay P.

I've faced the same for many times and all of that were due to Java version.
1st of all, you have to check the authorizations you have. If you have enough (DEVELOPER_J2EE, CONTENT_ORGANIZER_J2EE, and so), and - obvious but very often forgotten - you have to assure you're trying to change it in the message mapping change mode On.
Then, last shot should be downgrade your Java version.
The 1.4.2 JRE version allow you to use not only the Mapp the Identical field but also Dependencies, Clear Mapping and some other tools/buttons. As mentioned above, if there's a fix in the new Java releases, I do not know (hope so) and would appreciate if you could let us know.
Tks.

Similar Messages

Can we create the Mapping program,when source and target structures same?

Hi Friends,
if we have the same structure at source side and target side:
1) Is it necessary to create the mapping program?
2) If no need of mapping program what you will mention in the Interface Mapping?
3) In ID part which objects no need to create when both structures are same?
Regards,
Naidu.

Hi
>1) Is it necessary to create the mapping program?
No need to create mapping if both structure identical in all respects.
>2) If no need of mapping program what you will >mention in the Interface Mapping?
Dont define mapping and iterface mapping.
>3) In ID part which objects no need to create when >both structures are same?
You cannt assign a interface mapping as it is not defined in IR. leave that as interface mapping is not mandatory in Interface Determination Step.
Thanks
Gujjeti

Issue in OWB mapping - when changing source and target database

Hi,
I need help for resolution of the issue I am facing when moving mapping from development environment to QA.
Here is situation,
We develop ETL using one source, one staging and one target database.
In development we use one control_center for Source to staging and another control center staging to target.
All works fine in development.
Now I have created new runtime repository and imported all OWB projects (with full dependencies, exact replica of development). Now I need to change source and staging and target as different database.
I have created new database location connections and defined/attached DB connectors with stage and target location.
Now issues are
1.     Two Staging mapping are not able to bound with source table (giving different error
a.     One mapping show error for source synonym translation no longer valid when deploying this mapping , but validation comes without any issue)
b.     Other mapping show error for source table/object not bound to repository
2.     All the target mapping show validation successful, but when deploying says “table or view does not exist”. But tables are exists on source stage and target. (also permission are set correctly for target user to read from staging tables).
Not sure how to proceed from here.
I have recreated new repository and re-imported all project/mappings and defined all connection but still same issue.
Thanks in advance,
Vipin

1. Two Staging mapping are not able to bound with source table (giving different error
a. One mapping show error for source synonym translation no longer valid when deploying this mapping , but validation comes without any issue)
b. Other mapping show error for source table/object not bound to repository
The above error were resolved when re-synchronized the table (for few I have to reimport the table) and mapping.
2. All the target mapping show validation successful, but when deploying says “table or view does not exist”. But tables are exists on source stage and target. (also permission are set correctly for target user to read from staging tables).
The above error still pending. My target mapping are not able to deployed/compiled.
For the above I have defined one Staging location to one target target location and target location have connector to staging (not sure if I have to define connector name same as staging location, as I have created DB connector with different name but reference database is same as staging location).
Mapping are assoicated with desired data locatoin and meta data.
control center is also have that data location.
Mapping are configured for the desired location.

Different mapping programs for same source and target

Hi All,
I have to map the incoming idoc to xml messages.
But based on customer numbers in incoming idoc i have to use different mapping programs and map to same xml messages.
1 source message - n mapping programs - 1 target message
(based on cust numbers)
I dont want to harcode the customer numbers to find out the mapping programs.
Can anyone guide me in this on how to achieve this functionality...
thanks
Giridhar

Hi,
have you tried to use Conditions in the Interface Determination?
You can add multiple lines in the 'Configured Inbound Interfaces' and attach different mappings to each of them by picking a condition (basically using an XPath Expression).
Check this Help Document,
the section 'Multiple Identical Inbound Interfaces with Conditions' describes what I believe is your scenario.<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/42/ea20e737f33ee9e10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm">Multiple Identical Inbound Interfaces with Conditions</a>
regards,
Peter

Control center location source and targets

Hi,
I'm trying to document an OWB 11.2 repository and I'm trying to find a OWBSYS view that holds the assigned source and target locations for a control center in the design repository (what you see in the control center properties in the Locations tab) . Does anyone know where I can query this information?
Cheers,
John

Perhaps the table is repurposed between 10g and 11.2?
When I query that table I see a list of modules (information_system_name) and it's associated location (location_name) but I do not know if the location is a source or a target. A lot of these tables have been around since 9i so I guess in 9i speak I want to see the equivalent of the module type ('data source' or 'warehouse target').
In 11.2 the module no longer has this source or target concept directly via the module properties - it held against the control center properties - not that all_iv_control_centers shows this information - that is just a list of control center names and their associated remote server/workspace/workspace owner properties - which is similar to the old 9i runtime repository connection properties when using the deployment manager and pretty much the same as what you see when querying all_iv_runtime_repositories.
So, still not quite there yet...
Cheers,
John

HOWTO set source and target in WTK KToolbar

I am having trouble getting my MIDlet compiled when pressing the Build button in the WTK's KToolbar. I get the following error:
generics are not supported in -source 1.3
This is because I have JDK 1.6 installed and I'm trying to use a Vector in my code that is typed.
How do I configure the javac settings through the KToolbar so it uses the javac -source and -target arguments?
Thanks.

The thing is like
while practicing in my institute I had used "//ECCserver/SAPMNT" as path for both sender and reciever communication channels...
now i'm unable to write the path for both
please help me out

No mapping for Same structure in source and target

Hi Experts,
I want to transfer the source structure to two receivers . Here source and target structures are same so i dont need mapping.
My question is how many DT,MT and MI required .. mapping required or not.
Thanks in Advance
CS

hi CS,
here in your scenario as u have told that source and reciver are of same structure . definitely you didn't need any mapping . and you have to create two data type(one for sender and one for receiver) , two message types(one for sender and one for receiver)) , and two message interfaces(one for sender and one for receiver).
while creating message types it asks for data type and while creating message interface it asks for message type only . as the structures of sender and receiver are same then inspite of having two receivers we have to create ony one message interface on sender side . later the adapter will take care of further proceedings
but in case of configuration you have to import three business systems . one for sender and two for receiver systems . and you have to configure the communications channels accordingly. as per the receivers accepting the structures you have to use the relevant adaptors .

Is it possible to have source and target schema in the same DB instance ?

Hi All,
I'm using Oracle 11gR1.
I have switched source locations from other server to the one with OWB.
During deploy I get VLD-3064 and I can't deploy mapping because of many 'table or view does not exist' warnings.
Is it possible to have source and target schemas in the same instance ??
How to do it ?
Regards,
Martin

Hi Jörg,
Thanks for your help and quick answer.
I'd like to clarify a little your answer :
1. Are the any special privilages I need to set ? Currently I have only 'RESOURCE' and 'CONNECT' (I think I didn't have to add any other privs when that schema was located on other instance...)
2. Also VLD-3064 states that : 'Owning and referenced location of this connector are on the same database instance. Unless explicitly referenced in configuration settings no generated code will use the dataabase link resulting from deployment of this connector'. Does it mean I have to put something in configuration ?
Thanks,
Martin

Source and Target Table in the Same schema........will that work in ODI

Hi ,
Is it possible to have my source and target tables in the Same achema.......will it have any performance issues or some other issues in our ODI.......
I would like to know whether it works well or not .........
( To my understanding it wont have any issues ......But I am not 100 % sure on my judgement)
Thanks
AK

Yes, you're correct.
Just be sure about you load strategy, it means, if you need only to insert use the KM Control Append, but if need update too, try the IKM Oracle Incremental Update... I believe that will work better for millions of lines.
Anyway be sure that your database has the necessary tablespaces to manage huge data volume.

Why would I get different sized exe's if I build the same source code and target the same RT target?

Hi Bob P (Dr. RT) et al,
This is driving me nuts! I have a VI that uses different amount of memory depending on which machine I use to do the build.
I use the same build file and the same source.
It is targeted at the same cFP2000.
FP version is the same.
LV version is the same.
If I build it from the one machine, there is enough memory available to target the RT platform, show the front panel and do a "show RT engine info".
If I try this from the other machine, the cFP crashes, starts flashing the "status light" and latter on the crash dump file indicate "insuffiecient memory to complete this operation".
The OS on the two machines are both XP. O
ne is a laptop (the one that works) the other is a tower.
Are there any LV ini file settings that could be hitting me?
My customer is seeing the same issue, so it not just me.
Any clues?
Ben
Ben Rayner
I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
Rayner's Ridge is under construction

Hi Bob,
Few questions:
1)Ftp to your target. Are the exes the same size on disk?
No
2)Build the exes on the hosts. Are they the same size on disk?
I will have to look at this.
3)Can you determine whether the exes consume the same amount of memory when loaded on the hosts?
They will not run on the host because they use inport/output (to control serial port handshake lines).
4)Does your application call any dlls via an NI driver or custom-built?
THey use the "Settime.dll. At build time the builder says the target OS has its own version of this (and FP).
I'm doubtful that any LV ini settings are causing this behavior. If I had to take a guess, it could be related to dll versioning. Do the hosts have identical versions of *all*
drivers/dlls called by your app?"
Can you give me a suggestion on how verify this.
I have double checked LV (6.1) and FP.
Ben
Ben Rayner
I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
Rayner's Ridge is under construction

Can source and target tables be the same

Hi there,
I need to restate profit center column in the delivery fact table. Historical Profit Centers need to be populated since today is the first time we brought in Profit Center field from LIPS table. The source for the delivery fact table is SAP LIPS table. so what I did is:
joined the LIPS and delivery fact table on (LIPS.delivery number = deliveryfacttable.delivery number & LIPS.delivery line item number = deliveryfacttable.delivery line item number) to get the profit center.
So the source and the target delivery fact table are the same. Is this a good practice becuase Data services warns me that the source and target tables are the same.
Please let me know a better alternative approach to this OR a better approach to restate fields for historical data. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
samqiue

Arun,
actually the LIPS resides on another server and in order to fetch data I have to write an R3 ABAP data flow, so I cant use it directly in a lookup.
Except what Im thinking based on your reply to use a lookup table is: that I will extract 3 colums (delivery number, delivery line item number and profit center) to a table and then use the lookup.
Thanks.
Regards,
samique

Single Code Page Unicode conversion when source and target are the same

Hi everyone. We have recently upgraded our non-unicode 4.7 to ECC6 non-unicode. Now we have begun researching the next step to convert to Unicode. I know we could have done the Combined Upgrade and Unicode Conversion but I wanted to do thorough testing after the upgrade to eliminate too many variables if problems arose.
So, my question is...has anyone done the Unicode conversion when source and target servers are the same? Most documentation I've seen recommends a system copy to another box first. I did find one forum thread that gave a high level approach to doing the conversion with just one server and listed this:
Step 1:- Run Tcode SPUMG to scan
Step 2:- Export Database
Step 3:- Drop Database
Step 4:- Create New Database
Step 5:- Import database
Step 6:- Chnage unicode Kernel
What are your thoughts? Is it supported? Am I wasting my time and should I just bite the bullet and buy yet another system? Thanks in advance.
-Anthony

Theoretically that's possible, yes. However...
> Step 5:- Import database
> Step 6:- Chnage unicode Kernel
the import must be done using the Unicode kernel.
So basically you can
- export the old systm
- uninstall system + database
- start as if you were installing "from scratch" on a new box
Markus

LMDB - SLD "Source and target system have the same object server name"

Hi,
the system is a SM7.1 SP1
For some reason (Object-Server-Name changed), the job that syncs the sld and lmdb cancels...
I set the LMDB-Object-Server-Name to its original Name...
Now i've deleted the sync-config in the solman_setup and try to start a new sync, but i get the following error, when i try to configure the source-system:
'Source and target system have the same object server name: CISM318'
But the names are different: 'SM3' (LMDB) and 'CISM318' (SLD)
Any suggestions ?
best regards
Christoph
Edited by: Christoph Bastian on Aug 26, 2011 9:37 AM
Edited by: Christoph Bastian on Aug 26, 2011 11:18 AM

problem solved...
Apparently the sync needs some hours to finish a object-server-name-change...
best regards
Christoph

Error saving map. Stored procedure returned non-zero result. Check if source and target schemas are present.

I am using VS 2012 and BizTalk 2013 and attempting to deploy an application to BizTalk when I get these errors:
Error 47
at Microsoft.BizTalk.Deployment.Assembly.BtsMap.Save()
at Microsoft.BizTalk.Deployment.Assembly.BtsArtifactCollection.Save()
at Microsoft.BizTalk.Deployment.Assembly.BtsAssembly.Save(String applicationName)
at Microsoft.BizTalk.Deployment.BizTalkAssembly.PrivateDeploy(String server, String database, String assemblyPathname, String applicationName)
at Microsoft.BizTalk.Deployment.BizTalkAssembly.Deploy(Boolean redeploy, String server, String database, String assemblyPathname, String group, String applicationName, ApplicationLog log)
0 0
Error 49
Failed to add resource(s). Change requests failed for some resources. BizTalkAssemblyResourceManager failed to complete end type change request. Failed to deploy map "XXX.BTS2013.XXX.Maps.map_XXXX_R01_InsLabProc".
Error saving map. Stored procedure returned non-zero result. Check if source and target schemas are present. Error saving map. Stored procedure returned non-zero result. Check if source and target schemas are present.
0 0
Error 46
Failed to deploy map "XXX.BTS2013.XXX.Maps.map_XXXX_R01_InsLabProc".
Error saving map. Stored procedure returned non-zero result. Check if source and target schemas are present.
0 0
I also tried to Import a MSI file from our test environment to see if that would work...got the same errors. After spending hours (not kidding) looking for an answer, all I could find is that a hotfix would work. So, I got the hotfix from Microsoft
Support and applied it then rebooted. Still getting the same errors. I'm absolutely at a stand still. Interesting that I got this application to deploy yesterday and then the next time I deployed it I started getting these errors. I'm
ready to pull my hair out!
Is there an answer for this out there somewhere? Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Dave

Hi Dave,
Which hotfix have you applied? I don't think a hotfix of this issue is available for BizTalk 2013 yet. You should create a
support ticket with Microsoft to get a solution.
If this answers your question please mark as answer. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Keeping table name same in source and target

is it possible to keep the table name the same in source and target (they're on sepearte databases). Seems like OWB wants to rename the output table (usually adds 1 on the end). When I tried to rename I got a message saying that table name exists.

In my mapping.
First I defined a source and a target. The table on the target doesn't exist yet.
I open mapping editor...drag the table from my source. Let's call it TABLE_A. Then I add Table operator to the mapping (choose create unbound operator with no attributes option). For the name I choose TABLE_A...however when I click OK it then changes the name to TABLE_A_1.
So I double click on the table and change the name to TABLE_A and then I get the message that the table already exists.

Issue in mapping the same source and target fields

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for