Issue in MIRO for inventorized excise tax code

  I have created a PO with excise tax code, but the excise amount to be inventorized,
PO price   : 100
EXCISE         10
ECESS          0.20
SECESS        0.10
VAT              13.79
Total net amount   100  and tax amount  24.09
   now as the excise condition are mark as non deductible so after GR the material and GR account are posted with the amount 110.30, base price + excise tax amount which is OK.  But when I am doing the MIRO  I enter the total amount as 124.09  on the miro screen  then selected the tax code as per PO  then material it is showing with amount as 100 insted of 110.30,  because of this it is showing some balance differene , which i need to correct manually.
   Is there any option for this I want to create PO with same procedure with excise tax code which is to be post to inventory  but in MIRO i want to avoid this manual correction.

But when I am doing the MIRO I enter the total amount as 124.09 on the miro screen then selected the tax code as per PO then material it is showing with amount as 100 insted of 110.30, because of this it is showing some balance difference , which i need to correct manually.
why 124.09 vat also want to inventories ?
try this click on calculate tax icon in MIRO and check it 
Kailas Ugale

Similar Messages

  • How to handle "Validation failed for the field - Tax code" issue?

    We had mass uplaod the order that create on Mar with tax code effective date on Apr. Now we would like return on this order  and getting error of "Validation failed for the field - Tax code". How to handle this issue?

    You will have to check if the Tax_Code of RMA being received is the same as the one in the related sales order.
    If not you will need to use the same tax_code.
    Refer below document : Doc ID 1584338.1

  • Error while posting A/R Downpayment Invoice with Excisable Tax Code.

    While posting A/R Dowpayment Invoice with Excisable Tax Code error of "Unbalanced Transaction" appears. This error does not occur while posting A/R Downpayment Invoices with Non-Excisable Tax Codes.
    Kindly provide a solution for the same.

    SAP Note Number: 1179405
    Error -5002 when trying to copy a document with Sales BOM
    In order to create the delivery via the DI, you need to set the oDoc.Lines.BaseLine value to the LineNum value from the RDR1 table (in the above example you should enter the value 2).
    we set oDoc.Lines.BaseLine=0 before starting the lines loop. This has resolved the issue.
    This note was really helpful and it was found in another query.
    You can also refer to this.
    Edited by: Sadanand Manda on Nov 24, 2008 12:16 PM

  • Excise Tax Code mandatory in Purchase Request

    Hi Experts
    In Purchase Request or Purchase Order if user chooses Excisable item and Excise Warehouse SAP is not allowing to add without selecting excise Tax code. What is the Purpose of doing this validation at Purchase Request Level. Since user might not aware of tax code. If there any way to by-pass it.
    Karunakaran P.

    Hi Joseph
    Thanks for your reply. this may be work around solution but what is the purpose of selecting excise tax code in purchase request.
    One more thing how can we set the default tax code for purchase request document. i have tried following
    1. Tax Code determination
    2. No option for form settings default tax code in purchase request
    3. Tried with user defaults.
    all the above attempts were failed.
    Is there any other possible way to achieve this?
    Karunakaran P.

  • Excise Tax Code Creation

    Dear All SAP Guru..........................................................................................
    Please Give me a your advice for New TAX Code Creation....
    Basic Before Excise 6,797
    Excise  (fixed based on MRP  12990 x .65 x .1030) = 870
    Excise Paid Value :7,667
    VAT @ 5% : 383
    VAT & Octroi Paid Landing to Panchshil: 8,050
    MRP of the HOB : 12,990
    How was the Calculation ?

    Dear SIr,
    But on the Vendor (Supplier)Invoice Showing
    QTY :20
    Rate : 5217
    Total Amount : 104340
    Excise Duty per rate : 714
    Basic Excise Duty @ 6.5% : 14280.
    Eduucess @ 2% : 285.6
    ShEDucess @ 1% : 142.8
    Total Excise amount : 14708.4
    Total  Amount : 119048.4
    Vat @ 5% : 5952.42
    Payable Amount : 125000.82
    But Supplier say's My Rate @ Rs. 10990 * 6.5% (Excise Duty Rate) = 714.35 (Excise Duty per rate)
    Supplier notification for Excise duty + VAT
                    Gas cooking Stove :- Excise duty  is fixed and based on MRP the calculation is as follows u2013 MRP x 0.65x0.1030 (example if MRP is 10990 then 10990x0.65x0.1030 = Rs. 735) and the VAT in Maharashtra state on Gas Cooking Stove is @ 5%)
    Please help me for creation of tax code calculation .

  • Excise Tax Codes (Purchase/sales for 2nd stage dealers in trading company

    I have come across the similar problem mentioned below (the post is from SDN itself from Mr. Sandeep)
    what i understand is
    2. when you purchase a material from dealer
    Manufacturer to dealer item cost 100 + 20 Excise
    Dealer to you client 120+20 Excise
    Client to clients customer 130 +20 Excise
    your problem is to maintain 20 constant
    if it is so, create another Tax code in the formula instead of using 'base price' use 'assessable value'
    'assessable value' is what you mention in Item Masterdata right bottom. put 'assessable value = 20'
    I need some more clarification on the above issue. Also want to know the concept for 1st & 2nd stage dealer and how the SAP deals with it.

    Thanks Jeeva for the reply, but I could not got your point.
    My question is how to maintain the Tax code / Assessable Value so that we can  keep the Excise Amount to be paid to our Dealer constant.
    Let me repeat my question:
    Vendor A = Manufacturer
    Vendor B = Dealer
    Vendor C = Our Company
    B is purchasing 10 Qty @ Rs. 10 from A and B is paying Excise duty @10.3%
    Qty 10
    Price 10
    Amount 100
    Excise 10.3
    Here the Excise Amout paid to A by B is Rs. 10.3
    Now C is purchasing 10 Qty @ Rs. 12 from B, but C is paying Excise duty that was paid by B only to A i.e. Rs. 10.3
    As per the normal scenarios, the Excise duty that C is supposed to pay would be calculated on Rs. 12.36 as below:
    Qty 10
    Price 12
    Amount 120
    Excise 12.36
    But C needs to pay only Rs. 10.3 to B.
    As per my client, if we C buys 4 Qty from B, in that case C need to pay the Excise amount as per the below:
    Qty : 10 (Purchased By B)
    Price : 10  (Purchased By B)
    Amount : 100
    Excise @10.3% : 10.3 ; (Purchased By B)
    Total Qty : 10 (Purchased By B)
    Total Excise Paid On 10 Qty By B : 10.3
    Total Excise Paid On 1 Qty  By B : 1.03
    Qty Purchased By Us : 4 (Purchased By C)
    Total Excise to be Paid On 4 Qty by C : 4.12 (Purchased By B) -
    Here C is purchasing @Rs 12, still this price is not used for excise calculation.
    Hope my question is clear.
    Please guide,

  • Wrong Vendor Invoice Posting Due To Wrong Excise Tax Code

    We have created a Purchase Order as per below:
    Qty     10
    Price     100
    Value     1000
    Excsie 10%     0
    Cess     0
    SECess     0
    Value+Excise     1000
    VAT 5%     50
    ValueExciseVAT     1050
    (Please note that the PO was to be created in the following fashion as the Material was excisable)
    Qty     10
    Price     100
    Value     1000
    Excsie 10%     100
    Cess     2
    SECess     1
    Value+Excise     1103
    VAT 5%     55.15
    ValueExciseVAT     1158.15
    We did the Goods Receipt and the FI Document is as follows:
    24340000     Paper Stock     BSX     1,000.00
    13110100     GR/IR-ext proc     WRX     1,000.00-
    We did the Vendor Invoice Posting as follows:
    100183     SIEGWERK INDIA PVT LTD (SICPA)     KBS     1,050.00-
    13110100     GR/IR-ext proc     WRX     1,000.00
    24638100     VAT Recoverable     JP5     50.00
    The Material was issued to Cost Centre
    Later at the time of Excise Invoice posting, we came to know that the Tax Code in the Purchase Order was wrong. Here in our case, we have created separate Tax Code based on Excise Percentage. For example, V1 for VAT 5%, E1 for VAT %+Excise 10.3%.
    To post the excise invoice, we changed the Tax Code in the Purchase Order and did the Excise Posting as follows:
    24820020     CENVAT Inp SHEcess     1.00
    24820000     CENVAT Inp BED     100.00
    24820010     CENVAT InpEcess     2.00
    13113920     CENVAT clearing     103.00-
    My Question:
    a. Is this the correct way?
    b. What about the following FI Entries which got generated when we do the MIRO with actual Tax Code:
    100183     SIEGWERK INDIA PVT LTD (SICPA)     KBS     1,158.15-
    13110100     GR/IR-ext proc     WRX     1,000.00
    13113920     CENVAT clearing     JI1     100.00
    13113920     CENVAT clearing     VS9     2.00
    13113920     CENVAT clearing     JI6     1.00
    24638100     VAT Recoverable     JP5     55.15
    Please guide.

    Thanks Sanjoo for the reply.
    Here my worry is the all the postings have been made in SAP in Production Client.
    The User has already done the postings for MIRO & J1IEX without informing to us, and the volume of transactions is huge.
    We are in the back-log mode and at this stage, we can't go for any reversal . I am Just exploring the alternatives.
    Our MM & FI Users are little bit smart, when ever they do some mistake, they simply say "we will pass a JV" and we are not able to educate them that the JV is not a Solution. Please guide.

  • Error in PO Creation with Excise Tax Code

    I am getting the following error while creating a PO (in sandbox) in MM.
    No posting rules exist for account key
    Message no. FF714
    No posting rules have been defined for the account key in the tax table in table T007B.
    Change the tax table, enter an account key already defined for the transaction in question or define the posting rules for a new account key in table T007B.
    In sand box, I am making use of VS1(Condition Type JMOP)(10%), VS2(Condition Type JAOP)(2%), VS3(Condition Type JSOP)(1%) & JP5 Condition Type JVRD)(4%)Account keys with deductible nature in one tax code V8.   In OB40 GLs are defined.  Posting keys 40 & 50 are given.  In GL master all tax types allowed * is also given.  Also excise data is maintained in the vendor master.
    I am not getting the above error if I make use of any other tax code with only one percentage and one condition type.  I am getting the above error if make use of the above tax code V8 which is created for excise.
    Inputs are hightly solicited.

    Check this thread
    [No posting rules exist for account key|No posting rules exist for account key]
    Alternatively, check the following notes which may help you
    =>  Note 27350 - Missing account key
    =>  Note 32828 - Termination with FF714 when posting with FB01
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Excise tax code

    i want to create tax code in purchase order related to excise , please tell me tell me which condition should be taken,which account keys i have maintain J1id,
    Basic excise -10
    education cess-2
    secondary & higher education cess-1
    additional excise duty -4
    please guide me .

      U Can create the tax code using  FTXP,  for exxcise duty condition first check which condition u hav emaiatin in SPRO for excise duty condition determinatio  path as below
    SPRO - SAP IMG -Logistic general - tax on goods movement - india - basic settings - determination of excise duty -then maitain escise details,
      from this u will get the codnition which u have to use in excise in AP  i.e account payable  then using those condition make Tax code in FTXP,
    generaly  for CVD  : Condition JM01
    Edited by: zafar_karnalkar on Jun 19, 2010 7:46 AM

  • Base Amount of CST/VAT with Excise tax code

    Hi Experts,
    Please tell us the base amount on which CST will triggered in BED+CST combination of TAX CODE.
    Amit Tyagi

    Wherever BED is coming then exsice should be for its's manufacturing price not for purcahse, use Assessable value as base amount for this combinations.
    Thanga Raj.K

  • UDF For Retrieving the Tax Code based on PO

    Hi all,
    Mine is a file to Idoc scenario.
    I wrote a FM to retrieve the Tax Code based on PO .
    Created the udf which directly gets the Taxcode from the r/3 with out importing in to the imported objects,is this correct i never tried this before.
    Find the UDF for the Same.
    final String    CHANNEL_NAME = "GeneratedReceiverChannel_RFC",
         SAPRFCNS = "urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions",
         TAG_FM = "Z_P_INT012_RFC_LOOKUP",
         TAG_TAX_CODE = "T_TAX_CODE",
         TAG_TAX_CODE_P = "TAX_CODE";
    AbstractTrace trace = container.getTrace();
              DocumentBuilderFactory factory = DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance();
              DocumentBuilder builder = null;
              try {
                   builder = factory.newDocumentBuilder();
              } catch (Exception e) {
                   trace.addWarning("Error creating DocumentBuilder - " + e.getMessage());
              Document docReq = null;
              try {
                   // Building up RFC Request Document
                   docReq = builder.newDocument();
                   Node root = docReq.appendChild(docReq.createElementNS(SAPRFCNS, TAG_FM));
                   Node nodeTbOpt = root.appendChild(docReq.createElement(TAG_TAX_CODE));
                   for (int i = 0; i < pernr.length; i++) {
                        Node nodeTbOptItem = nodeTbOpt.appendChild(docReq.createElement("item"));
              } catch (Exception e) {
                   trace.addWarning("Error while building RFC Request  - " + e);
              trace.addInfo("RFC Request XML: " + docReq.toString());
                                                    //trace.addWarning("RFC Request XML: " + docReq.toString());
              // Lookup
              Payload load = null;
              try {
                   Channel channel = LookupService.getChannel(receiver[0], CHANNEL_NAME);
                   RfcAccessor accessor = LookupService.getRfcAccessor(channel);
                   InputStream is = new ByteArrayInputStream(docReq.toString().getBytes());
                   XmlPayload payload = LookupService.getXmlPayload(is);
                   load =;
              } catch (LookupException e) {
                   trace.addWarning("Error during lookup - " + e);
              // Parsing RFC Response Document
              Document docRsp = null;
              try {
                   docRsp = builder.parse(load.getContent());
              } catch (Exception e) {
                   trace.addWarning("Error when parsing RFC Response - " + e.getMessage());
              trace.addInfo("RFC Response XML: " + docRsp.toString());
                                                    //trace.addWarning("RFC Response XML: " + docRsp.toString());
              try {
                   NodeList res = docRsp.getElementsByTagName("item");
                   for(int i=0;i<res.getLength();i++){
                        NodeList itemNodes = res.item(i).getChildNodes();
                        Map itemMap = new HashMap();
                        for(int j=0;j<itemNodes.getLength();j++){
                             itemMap.put(itemNodes.item(j).getNodeName(), itemNodes.item(j).getFirstChild().getNodeValue());
                                                            catch (Exception e) {
                   trace.addWarning("Result value not found in DOM - " + e);
    16:24:08 Start of test
    Source code has syntax error:  /usr/sap/XD1/DVEBMGS30/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Map283041f0edf311dd960b0003bacd2461/source/com/sap/xi/tf/ 'class' or 'interface' expected public void TaxValues$(String[] a,String[] b,ResultList result,Container container){ ^ /usr/sap/XD1/DVEBMGS30/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Map283041f0edf311dd960b0003bacd2461/source/com/sap/xi/tf/ 'class' or 'interface' expected } ^ /usr/sap/XD1/DVEBMGS30/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Map283041f0edf311dd960b0003bacd2461/source/com/sap/xi/tf/ 'class' or 'interface' expected ^ 3 errors  Source code has syntax error:  /usr/sap/XD1/DVEBMGS30/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Map283041f0edf311dd960b0003bacd2461/source/com/sap/xi/tf/ 'class' or 'interface' expected public void TaxValues$(String[] a,String[] b,ResultList result,Container container){ ^ /usr/sap/XD1/DVEBMGS30/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Map283041f0edf311dd960b0003bacd2461/source/com/sap/xi/tf/ 'class' or 'interface' expected } ^ /usr/sap/XD1/DVEBMGS30/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Map283041f0edf311dd960b0003bacd2461/source/com/sap/xi/tf/ 'class' or 'interface' expected ^ 3 errors
    16:24:11 End of test.

    Hi Potharaju,
    Why don't you try this, that really works:
    If you are using PI 7.1:
    If you are using XI 3.0, PI 7.0
    Try with these.

  • User exit for ME21N for displaying the tax code from custom table

      I have a requirement, in our system, the inforecord is not maintain for all the material and vendor combination,  we have a custom table in which we have maintain the
    Compnay code, Pur. Org., Vendor code  Tax code,  juridiction code
    now we want that when a Po is created with ME21 or ME21N  the tax code and jurisdiction code should be come from this table  and if entry not found in this table then it should search as per the regular process like from last Po or info record.  then which user exit we can use for this.


  • Report for determining withholding tax codes for vendors

    Dear Experts,
    Is there any report in SAP thru which I can determine the withholding tax codes assigned to a particular vendor? This is required as the client has over 100 withholding tax codes and not able to know which vendor is assigned to which withholding tax.
    Appreciate your inputs

    Pls use the report Code S_ALR_87012086. In the output control, pls tick the check box "EXTENDED WITH HOLDING TAX." You will get the desired out put for your company code.
    Sanil Bhandari

  • Issue with document created with a tax code related to a different Company Code

    we need to clear a document created with the tax code "YY" which is associated to the Company Code Espana even if the vendor of this document belongs to the Country Portugal.
    When we try to clear this documents we get the follow error:
    Tax code YY for Country Portugal has been deleted or incorrectly changed
    The problem is the tax code exists but it is associated to Company Code Espana and not to the Portugal one
    In order to cleare this document should we activate the tax code for Portugal, as well?
    Thank You

    Hello, Are you trying to post entry having Plant in Portugal? Thanks, Deepanshu

  • EDI invoice failed for Service- multiple tax code at service item level

    Hi Guys,
    Please understand below scenarios, it is very critical to our client.
    purchase order has 3 parent
    line item which having the 3 services with tax code (P1-P1-P1 and P2-P2-P2 and (P2-P1-C1)
    (P1=10%, P2=10% and C1=10%)
    PO Outbound Idoc -
    Similar tax codes(P1-P1-p1 and P2-P2-P2) - Carries total tax amount and
    tax rate at parent level also it carries indvidual service line item
    tax amount and tax rate at service item level
    Mulitple tax codes(P2-P1-C1)- Carries only total tax amount at parent
    level and no tax rate at parent level. It carries indvidual service
    line item tax amount and tax rate at service item level
    SES Outbound Idoc -
    Similar tax codes(P1-P1-p1 and P2-P2-P2) - Carries total tax amount at
    parent level segment and tax rate at parent item level also it carries
    indvidual service line item tax amount and tax rate at service item
    Mulitple tax codes(P2-P1-C1)- Carries only total tax amount at parent
    level and no tax rate at parent level. It carries indvidual service
    line item tax amount and tax rate at service item level
    But while creating the invoice for parent line item which includes 3
    services, it carries correct tax amount(as per PO and SESR) but it is
    asking for tax rate at parent level not at service item level.
    It is working fine for similar tax code at service line item (e.g P1-P1-p1 for 3 services or P2-P2-P2 for all 3 services) but when we use the combination of tax code or multiple tax code at service line items (e.g. P2-P1-C1), the inbound Idoc gets failed.
    Expectation - How EDI invoice posted for mulitple Services under one parent line item which having multiple tax codes at service item level

    This is an ongoing problem with lots of clients - did anyone solve it ?

Maybe you are looking for

  • Install Documentation for MSS 60.1.19

    Does anyone know where I can find documentation with explicit instructions on installing MSS 60.1.19?  If I go "Business Package for Manager Self-Service 60.1" in the SAP Library, it suggests that Note:642775 has instructions for installing business

  • Error Message: Disk is Full

    Just started using iTunes 9 on Windows Vista and i've started getting error messages when either uploading songs or requesting album art: "The iTunes library file cannot be saved. The disk you are attempting to use is full" The problem being is that

  • Data in adobe form gets cleared when saved to desktop(Form is added in WD)

    Dear All, I have adobe form incorporated in a wed dynpro component. It's an interactive form and user has option to fill in details in the form. There is a submit button which user can click in order to submit details. This submit in turn does postin

  • Bulk discount price -

    Hello All, i have a scenario where customer is doing certain amount of volume sales and each sales document gets its said material specific discounts (deducted right in net price of document and reports to accounts), based on the volume he is eligibl

  • MBPro 17 Intel Core 2 Duo Audio only works with the headphones?

    MBPro 17 Intel Core 2 Duo Audio only works with the headphones? There is a red light constantly emitting from the headphone socket? I can not listen to sound unless headphones are plugged in - when taken out I get a red light and the volume controls