Issue in transfer posting

Dear All,
In my client side  there is a issue that  for few materials like oil ,container is of 190 L, but sometimes it happens like, actually container can contain less or more than 190 L which production people knows during consumption  to process order. now how to map that difference in quantity in the system.
Thanks
Vivek Varun

Hi Vivek,
Since you come to about the quantity only at the time of GI to the process order, you can create
a separate movement type for Dispensing Loss(Less quantity) and Reversal of Dispensing Loss(More quantity).
Difference in quantity ( + or - ) will be captured in these movement types.
Thanks,
Thomas.

Similar Messages

  • Cost transfer posting within Training and event management

    Dear experts!
    Now, I'm getting some issues about transfer posting in Training and event management.
    - The first, I create business event.
    - Second, I posted cost of business event to CO.
    when I posted to CO, I only want to give cost of business event to one cost center. But the system require I have two cost center:
              + Sender cost center
              + Receive cost center.
    Really, I want to post cost of business event to Receive cost center.
    How do I have to do?
    Help me, Please!
    Best regards, Huy

    Hi huy daongoc ,
    you need to find out from the FICO guys. 
    If the sender cost center and the receiver cost center is same.  then give both records.  They will help you out.
    I think Sender cost center means the cost center under which the training is organised.
    Receiving cost center means the persons who are all receiving the training, those persons cost center.
    Regards
    Venu Gopal

  • Supply Area Goods Transfer Posting Problem

    Dear SAP Gurus,
    I am facing a problem in which material has to be issued by transfer posting through movement type 541 to Subcontracting Vendor.
    The material is to be issued from Supplying Area.
    When transfer posting is initiated for the PO, material is not getting issued from Supplying area whereas all other BOM materials are being picked up.
    Please guide me where can this problem be?
    Thanks & Regards
    Manav Anand

    Hi,
    I hope you are using ME2O or MB1B transaction with 541 mvt type. As per Subcontracting scenario you are supposed to sent the BOM mateials only to your subcontracting vendor and finally supposed to get the material which is raised in the PO.
    Now please let us know where you have been stuck so that we will be able to help by providing our explanations.
    Regards,
    DilL

  • Dynamic Availability Check for Goods Issue,Transfer Posting

    Dear All,
    Can anyone explain the Dynamic Availability Check??
    I mean the relevance on setting this indicator for a mov.type?
    In OMCM & OMCP I have defined a Checking Rule & also assigned the same to a Mov.type as well the transaction code?
    whether the Dynamic Availability Check concept is same in case of sales ie Say I have a Stock of 100 qtys for a material in a plant & in the availability Scope of Check I have ticked the include safety stock.
    In my material master I have a safety stock of 500 qtys.
    So when I do a transfer posting for this material with Qty as 200, System should allow me do proceed as in my availability check I have enabled the safety stock option.
    But this is not happening & I am getting an error message as deficit of stock 100 nos. Also what is use of setting the dynamic availability check indicator for my mov.type as A - Warning message , B - Error Message etc..
    Kindly suggest valuable inputs.
    Thanks & Regards,

    For e.g. there is Available Stock = 1000 qty and safety stock in material master = 500 qty then system will allow you to use 1000 qty only not 1500 qty
    This is only used for availability check purpose whether system it should be considered or not?
    And following indicators means;
    A  W mess. only issued in the case of non-availability
    B  E mess. only issued in the case of non-availability
    E  Message in any case: W mess. for non-avail., otherw. S mess.
    F  Message in any case: E mess. for non-avail., otherw. S mess.
    S  Availability check only with simulation
    The above indicators indicate whether the system is to check for existing material requirements.
    Award appropriately once the thread is answered.

  • Auto print of Goods Issue/Transfer Posting Documents by Movement type

    Hi,
    We have created two different output types to print the layout's of Goods Issue/Transfer Posting Documents.
    The requirement is to default the message in the document by movement type (key combination)
    Meaning if it is 201 it should populate GI output type
    If it is 313 it should populate TP output type.
    we do not have any standard key combination  (NACR) by movement type wise.
    Any alternative way of meeting this requirement?
    Thanks
    Regards
    Ram

    Hello Kevin,
    I donu2019t think it is necessary to use a user exit to keep the Material B (that is transferred from Material A) in the same bin.
    This can be controlled in the customizing: indicator Post to same bin, that can be set in the WM Movement type (V_T333-KZUAP) and in the Storage type (V_T3010-KZUAP).
    Now I donu2019t know your business process but I am surprised that Material B requires more space than Material A since it is u2018bornu2019 by means of a transfer posting and not a production or packing step that makes it bigger in terms of capacity required.
    A workaround for this could be to transfer (LT10) Material A first to a separate Storage type (with the Post to same bin-flag set) that has no Capacity check and after the 309 posting transfer it back into the warehouse with LT10.
    Success and thanks beforehand for any credits!
    Kind regards,
    Bart

  • Transfer Posting Issue through MB1B

    Hi,
    We have a requirement that During Transfer Posting of Material through MB1B transaction, User should be able to transfer the Stock within SAME Material Code (From Material A to Material A, but in diff. Plant)...
    If User want to Transfer the Stock of A Material to B Material, system should not allow the same...
    Please guide...

    SAP~MM wrote:
    > But If, we want to Transfer the Stock to another Plant with same material code, then by which movement type we can do it..
    >
    > Please guide...
    MVMT type : 301 Transfer posting plant to plant in one step
    The quantity is transferred from unrestricted-use stock in the issuing plant to unrestricted-use stock in the receiving plant.
    Possible special stock indicators: O, V, W
    MVMT type : 303 Transfer posting plant to plant in two steps - removal from storage
    The quantity is transferred from unrestricted-use stock of the issuing plant to stock in transfer in the receiving plant.
    For technical reasons, you cannot carry out transfer postings from plant to plant in two steps for split-valuation materials.
    Removal from storage can be posted via an SD delivery.

  • Automatic batch determination during transfer posting. Issue.

    Hi All,
    Please could anyone advise to solve the following problem with automatic batch determination:
    1. When delivery is created for sales order, SAP automatically assigns batch number.(SLOC 1)
    2. From time to time there is a need to transfer the same material number, which is on delivery to another sloc2.
    3. Using Mb1b tcode i do transfer posting from SLOC1 to SLOC 2. In batch field i put * or (**) for automatic generation. (movement 311).
    The problem appears here, when SAP automatically assigns the same batch to transfer posting which was assigned to delivery (p.1).
    So that after transfer posting done, there is no required quantity left in batch needed to do a goods issue for delivery. So goods issue is not possible because of that kind of transfer posting.
    Do you have any idea, how to manage this, and to restrict SAP choosing the same batch which was assigned to delivery.
    Thank you,
    Kind Regards.

    There are 3 strategy types setup in MBC3 (1, 2)
    ME01, ME02 which are standart SAP.
    And one started from Z* with settings below:
    Plnt
    Valid From
    Valid to
    Delet.Ind.
    No. split
    Cpl.change
    OnlineBdet
    UnitofMeas
    MProposal
    Selection
    Sort seq.
    AAAA
    04.01.2006
    31.12.9999
    099
    X
    B
    001
    X
    X
    |
    Date of last goods receipt
    ascending
    Kind Regards,
    Andrey

  • WMS Transfer posting from Q to unrestricted issue.

    Hi All
    Im having some issue  in when I change from Quality inspection to Unrestricted stock.
    When I GR using MVT 101, the stock will go into Interm Area 902 with Q status in the warehouse
    I then use MVT 321 to post the certain material from Q to unrestricted.
    When I use LS26 to check, the stock status of the material has changed from Q to unrestricted.
    However when I create a TO, the status in the TO is still "Q". ( it should be unrestricted so when i do confirm the TO , it will be placed into the propose bin as unrestricted stock not Quality Inspection )
    I check the TR that was created for that material and the stock status is still "Q".
    Is there some setting im missing from my configuration , as the system should automatically change the TR from stock status "Q" to unrestricted after the transfer posting from MVT 321?
    Thanks in advance !

    Hi Frenchy
    Thanks for the reply.
    As explained before. When I do a MIGO from inbound, in the WMS warehouse it should go to a general receipt area ( 902 ) as it should not directly go to bin because its needs to pass IQC before it should be properly transfer from the general receipt area to the bin. In the warehouse via LS26. It's status is Q, and you are correct, when I create the MIGO it automactically creates a TR with the status. After it has pass IQC, ( via inspection lot QA11), a transfer posting is created to for the material ( by batch code ) to change to unrestricted stock. Again in WMS view via LS26. The stock with the batch code is changed to unrestricted.
    Now, my question is, after MVT 321 for transfer posting, in WMS is there a linkage where it should automactially change the TR status to unrestricted so when i create a TO via material document of the GR, it should go to unrestricted instead?

  • Transfer posting from batch to batch using 309 or 311 issue

    Hi Experts,
    Need your help, I'm facing the following issue, I'm trying to transfer posting from batch to other batch using 309,
    Using MIGO
    the material, plant, storage location are the same but the batch number are different, I didn't get any message and when I save, there's nothing is changed, I checked the material document and found that the destination batch is same as source batch.
    Using MB1B
    the material, plant, storage location are the same but when I entered the source batch, the batch number is copied to the destination batch number and I got message  M7104 "stock to be removed from storage same as stock to be placed into the storage" and I can't change the destination batch number.
    Please advise how can I solve this issue or if there's any alternative way to transfer from batch to other by one step.
    Regards,
    Mohamed Mansour.

    You can well use 309 movement type in MIGO or MB1B and also you can well change the receiving batch number during the transaction..
    MB1B
    MIGO
    I think you can able to change the receiving batch.
    What the status of receiving batch shows in MIGO or MB1B ?
    Also check you field selection for movement type 311
    Go to OMBW, double click on 311, then double click on Transfer Posting
    It should be as optional entry.
    Then try again MB1B.
    Regards
    Dev

  • Transfer posting (OASV) issue for the existing Intangible Assets

    Hi SAP Experts,
    In our system the APC and Acc. Dep. for ord. dep. has maintained the same G/L Account (A090) so due to this in Fin. Statement it shows the Net Book Value. Now, our client wants to migrate to IFRS, as per this it has to show like ( Intangible Assets - Acc. amortization - Acc. Impairment Loss).  Now, I have created new account i.e. 'Accumulated Amortization for Intangible Assets A/c and removed the old G/L A/c (the one which is same for both APC and Acc. Dep.). Now, the old G/L has the APC and Acc. Dep. values so I need to transfer the Acc. Dep. from old G/L to New G/L A/c by using OASV (Transfer posting).
    If I make the transfer posting like (the both G/L Accounts are Recon. A/cs)*
          Debit Old G/L A/c    - xx,xx,xxx
          Credit New G/L A/c - xx,xx,xxx
    Is it any impact on the values (Intangible Assets) Dep. Area wise? Since, APC and Acc. Dep. already posted to old A/c up to this point of time. Another doubt is, while posting the above entry shall I need to switch off (Reset) Recon. A/c for this Intangible Assets? OR without Reset Recon. A/c can I post this transfer posting? Is this correct procedure or other than this is there any other alternative?
    we have 9 Dep. Areas out of which 3 Dep. Areas have posting indicator as '1'. In that out of 3 Dep. Areas one Dep.  Area namely 'Impairment Loss' is there but there are no positings till now. After config. change it should allow ABIF tr. that we completed already.
    Could anyone explain why this 'Investment Support' Dep. Area (Impairment Loss) doesn't allow APC values by default?
    Thanks in advance.
    Best Regards,
    Sri.

    Hi Sri,
    Let me clarify your points individually.
    1) From system the prospective, it does not make any diff in functionality for a tangable asset or an intangable asset.
    2) Add the new GL account in the respective account dtermination as a balance sheet account for accum dep. (while adding, the GL account should be as recon account)
    3) Please switch off the recon account indicator in the both GL accounts with OAMK.
    For Ex: Lets say you have already posted APC  value 10000 Dr and Accum dep 2000 Cr to the old GL account, so the net book value will be 8000 Dr.
    In this case Please find out the total value of line items (2000 Cr as per the above example) for accum dep, that was already posted to the old GL account.
    4) Post a journal voucher through F-02 like
                                                      Old G/L A/c Dr - 2000
                                                                    New G/L A/c Cr - 2000
    So after passing this entry you will find account balance as 8000 Dr in old GL account and 2000 Cr in new GL account.
    5) after passing the above entry you need to switch on the recon account for both the GL accounts
    Hope this will help.
    Thanks,
    Srinu

  • Transfer posting issue

    while doing transfer posting from QI stock to unrestricted stock, following error message is occuring.
    plz suggest the solution.
    Change the inspection stock of material xxxx in QM only
    Message no. QA495
    Diagnosis
    You want to make a stock posting to/from the inspection stock. This is not allowed for material xxxxx because the quality inspection control has been activated by QM.
    The following cases can occur:
    The inspection stock should be increased, although an inspection is not foreseen for the current goods movement
    The inspection stock should be released, although  you can only do this using the QM transactions.
    System Response
    You cannot carry out the stock posting.
    Procedure
    Check both the QM inspection setup data and the movement type for material xxxx in the quality management view of the material master.
    Exception:
    If you post a return delivery to a vendor with reference to a purchase order, or cancel a goods receipt, the stock indicator from the order is proposed.
    Check and modify this proposal as required.
    The stock may have been transferred already and is therefore no longer in inspection stock.

    Hi,
    Please reffer the below link:
    Change the inspection stock of material xxxx in QM only
    Thanks and Regards
    Binoj M D

  • Plant to Plant Transfer posting issue

    Hi,
    We would like to make a transfer posting within a company, but would like to markup the price for receiving plant.
    Example as below:
    Material ABC price is 5 in Plant 1000 and Plant 1001
    We would like to transfer the material from plant 1000 to 1001
    But we want to markup the price for material ABC in plant 1001 with price 6
    Is this possible, and how?
    Steven

    Hi,
    Price in the receiving plant : 5 Rs
    Price in the STO document : 6 Rs
    Case 1: If Price control indicator is 'S'
    BSX 5 +
    PRD 1 +
    WRX 6 -
    Price in the material master record doesn't change.
    Case 2 : If Price control indicator is 'V'
    BSX 6 +
    WRX 6 -
    Price in the material master record will change.
    BSX G/L account will come based on the valuation class which is in the material master record, which is created with the receiving plant.
    Regards
    Ravi

  • WM- WM stock (quality) to not activated storage loc-Transfer Posting issue

    hi friends
    I Have a error during transfer posting (321 mov type). After quality inspection the stock is rejected . so i have to move to WM not
    activated Storage location. After transfer posting, TR  is generated From material document. then iam trying to create to transfer order , but i have the error
    System cannot find source storage bin
    Message no. L3 008
    Diagnosis
    The system was not able to determine a source storage bin for this material.
    This problem can be caused for several reasons:
    1. The material no longer exists in your warehouse.
    2. The material is in your warehouse, but currently cannot be reached by the system (for example, the material is just being transferred by one of the conveyor machines).
    3. The material is in your warehouse, but not in the storage type and storage areas that are defined in your system for the material search.
    Procedure
    Check to see if the material really exists in your warehouse.
    If the reason for the error is the third one mentioned above, contact your system administrator
    Our bussiness is
    lXRM storage location is WM activated
    lXA   storage location is not WM activated
    1. create PO
    2.GRN- Quality Inspection
    3 If ok Means Stock is move to lXRM
        If not ok Means Stock is move to lXA.
    my queries is i want to move quality stock (WM) to not activated storage location.
    with regards
    dinesh

    hi friends
                     thanks for response,
    1. create PO
    2.GRN- Quality Inspection,* Initially i GRN receipt LXRA Storage location
    3 If ok Means Good Stock is move to lXRM. (storage location)
    If not ok Means Bad Stock is move to lXA.(storage location)
    we have not quality module, once do the Migo the manually the assign quality inspection(STOCK TYPE).  After quality inspection
    done, Then do the 321 mov type user should decide some good quantity move to unrestricted stock LXRM (Storage
    location) ,some bad quantity move to the scrap storage location (lXA) .
    *STORAGE LOCATION LXA is not activated WM
    My request is, i want to move to the Scrap location (LXA). after 321 movement type done, TR is generated then i am trying to do the transfer order . system is not accepted , iam getting error
    wiht regards
    dinesh
    Edited by: code acess on Aug 27, 2011 4:45 AM
    Edited by: code acess on Aug 27, 2011 4:46 AM

  • Transfer posting from one GL account to another

    Hi,
    For a GL account which is not open item managed, now have to check the "open item management".
    since it has the amount, so i can not do it.
    But i read the following help message.
    If you want to switch this function on retroactively for a certain account, you should create a new account with the correct setting and use this to make a transfer posting of existing items.
    so, after creating a new GL account with correct settings. How to Transfer the posting of the Existing items?
    Thanks in advance,
    Swetha

    Hi all,
    i posted a document in F-02 by debiting the new GL account and crediting the old account.
    now, the balance of the old account is Zero.
    but still can not save it by checking the " open item management" because it says as below.
    "Account balance = 0 but open items exist in the account
    The data contains error, you cannot save"
    so, by making zero also we can not change the that Chcek box.
    and another option you all suggested is transfer of the posting to new Gl account.
    since the old account is not open item managed, so i can not follow this option also.
    and one more, have to come across this kind of issue?
    then how did you solve it.
    Please share your finding.
    Regards,
    Swetha

  • Asset Transfer posting ABT1N

    hI,
    while working with transaction ABT1N Asset transfer posting from existing (comp code) asset to new (comp code) asset with
    Document, posting, asset value date -> this will be the same date 1.1.2011,
    system gives error message" You cannot post to asset in company code 'abcd' fiscal year 2011.
    After that
    I changed the Document, posting, asset value date -> this will be the same date 20.11.2011, system gives error message "
    Account 20900000 does not exist in company code 'abcd'.
    Please resolve the issue both the scenarios.
    Thanks,
    Sahara.

    please search.  the "account does not exist" error has been dealt with previously.

Maybe you are looking for