Issue Regarding AME setup

Hi All,
We have a requirement of creating an AME setup for Cost center and category approval.
The requirement is that, for a PO Requisition header, the approval must be routed dynamically on the basis of requisition total at header level. A header may have multiple lines, each line will have a particular category, and the approval must be routed for each line on the basis of category at line level .Now for each line there might be multiple cost centers, for each cost center the approval must be routed separately at distribution level.
E.G. Let say we Requisition 123456, with lines A and B.
Line A have cost centers 0000 and 0001.B has cost center 0000 and 0002
So approvals must be routed in the following way
Header Level:
Requisition total amount of A and B => approval routed to Smith
Line Level:
A category (software) must route to head of software person
B category (hardware)  must route to head of hardware person
Distribution Level
For A, Cost center
0000 Must be routed to supervisor of department
0001  Must be routed to supervisor of department
For B, Cost center
0000  Must be routed to supervisor of department
0002  Must be routed to supervisor of department
Please suggest if this business requirement is possible in Ame and suggest a proper approach to proceed with the requirement.
Regards
Alok
Edited by: 993714 on Mar 13, 2013 12:28 PM

Hi;
Please check below which could be helpful for your issue:
How To Setup And Use AME For Purchasing [ID 434143.1]
AME : How to Diagnose Issues With the Default Approver List in Purchasing When Using Approvals Management [ID 1437183.1]
Regard

Similar Messages

  • One issue regarding PPDS OP.confirmation from Legal Non-SAP system

    Dear Experts
    we met a BAPI function issue regarding PPDS Operation.confirmation from Legal Non-SAP system.
    scenario is as following:
    we want to build the interface between PPDS and non-SAP system, regarding OP. and order confirmation inbound processing.
    now we input simulated inbound date and test using BAPI: BAPI_MOSRVAPS_CONFOPRMULTI
    but we find a problem, even we set different value for fields ‘ duration’ in function. after call BAPI, It didn't reflect the 'net duration' or 'remaining duration', these fields not changed through check in Tcode:/SAPAPO/RRP3 for single operation.
    In the meanwhile , but it works for fields 'confirmed Yield' and fields 'confirmed Scrap' for single operation.
    my questions is that: if we need to synchronize the operation confirmation( including confirmed yield,confirmation scrap, duration),do we use the correct BAPI for this or do we need an additional BAPI, please hints.
    Thanks a lot! any feedback would be welcome!
    Best Regards
    Kevin

    Hi Kevin,
    Yes you use the right BAPI.
    you have to use table OPERATION_CONFIRMATION.
    You cannot just set the duration. You have to trigger time event confirmations.
    The field duration according to the documentation currently not supported.
    You need to use CONFIRMATION_TYPE
    0100 Start of Setup
    0150 End of setup
    0200 Start of processing
    0300 Partially complete
    0350 Complete
    Not sure if all confirmation types are supported by the BAPI.
    You can also set start and end time but not sure either whether it is supported or not.
    Regards,
    Uli

  • I am having an issue regarding a placed order via customer service department

    I recently relocated to Anchorage Alaska as part of a permanent change of station per the United States Air Force. I was initially located on the East Coast in the lower 48 and at the time of activating my contract I had purchased two separate Iphone 4 devices. I also recently went in to a store in February to purchase a Nexus 7 as well.
    Upon arrival in Anchorage I had multiple issues regarding the Iphone 4 devices including being unable to send and receive text messages & imessages, unable to make phone calls, dropped phone calls, unable to utilize GPS, as well as not being able to access general account information and use anything related to web browsing or data usage. It was determined that because the Iphone 4 operates on the 3g network and Verizon does not have a 3g network in Alaska, as a result I was utilizing an extended service network from another carrier. As a result of this I am only able to use my Iphone 4 devices while connected to my wi-fi network while within my home, which is totally unacceptable.
    I was not made aware that I would be dealing with this when I moved to Alaska and inquired as the the use of the devices I currently owned prior to purchasing the tablet. I was assured by three separate store employees one of which being a manager that all devices would function at 100% efficiency including the Iphone 4s. In fact I was recently billed 350$ for roaming charges last month, which prompted me to speak with a representative via the online chat regarding the significant increase she said that she was unable to process any sort of credit to the account regardless of what I had been told at a local Verizon store where I purchased the tablet.
    As a result of all of these mishaps since arriving here in Alaska I determined I was in need of newer devices that utilize the 4G LTE network currently provided by Verizon in Alaska. I know for a fact that the 4G LTE works great up here because my Nexus 7 tablet runs flawlessly and does not incur roaming charges when utilizing the 4G LTE network.
    Yesterday I attempted to contact Verizon through the live chat feature regarding upgrading two of the devices on my account. The live chat representative immediately asked me when my upgrade date was. Upon telling her my upgrade date 9/29/2014 she told me I should contact the customer service department as I might be eligible for an early upgrade. I then proceeded to contact the customer service department using my Iphone 4.
    My attempt to speak to anyone in the customer service department resulted in a merry-go-round of being put on hold 6 separate times by two different employees, both of which had me wait for more than an hour while they attempted to speak to a manager to gain approval for an early upgrade. The first rep seemed almost sure she would be able to have my devices upgraded early especially considering the issues I was having regarding service.
    The second rep seemed newer and was very dodgy about my questions and was very unwilling to help at first. He even mentioned that I had been a Verizon customer for almost two years, had never missed a single payment and had outstanding account history which should have garnered some sort of importance to the level of my request. But I digress, during this time I was disconnected from the call twice from each separate representative.
    Both reps assured me they would call me back, I never did get a call back from either one of those reps and I was becoming very frustrated having waited four hours trying to find some sort of solution to my current predicament.
    After waiting an hour for the second representative to call back I grew impatient and contacted the customer service department, was put on hold again, and finally reached a third customer service representative who was able to provide a solution for me.
    I explained everything I had been dealing with to Cory ID #  V0PAC61, both regarding the phones, the issue of the level of service I was receiving, the dire need for working devices and the multiple times I had been disconnected. I explained to him as a result of these issues I was certainly considering switching to a different provider, a local provider even who could provide me the adequate service that I require for my mobile devices.
    I explained to Cory that I had been with Verizon for almost two years, and I had been on a relatives account prior to owning my own Verizon account and had never received this kind of treatment when trying to work towards a simple solution. Cory proceeded to tell me he needed to put me on hold to see if there was anything that could be done regarding the upgrades of the device considering all of the trouble I had been dealing with.
    After Cory reconnected with me in the phone call he was able to successfully reach a solution by allowing me to upgrade my devices. We conversed about the options available and I eventually decided to upgrade both Iphone 4 devices to Moto X devices as we determined those would be sufficient for my needs while in Alaska. I also proceeded to add two Otter Box Defender cases to the order so that the devices would have sufficient protection. Cory inquired as to whether or not I would like to purchase insurance for the phones as well and I opted for the $5.00 monthly insurance which including damage and water protection.
    Cory explained to me the grand total for the devices which included an activation fee of $35.00 for each device, $49.99 for each Otter Box case, and an additional $50.00 for each device which would be refunded as a rebate upon receipt of the devices and activation, a rebate that I would be required to submit. Cory explained to me that the devices would most likely arrive Tuesday of 6/17 and no later than Wednesday 6/18.
    Cory took my shipping information and told me everything was all set and the only thing left to do was to transfer me to the automated service so that I could accept the 2 year agreement for both devices. I thanked him very much, took his name and ID# so that I might leave positive feedback about his exemplary customer service and was then transferred to the automated service.
    Once transferred to the automated service I was then prompted to enter both telephone numbers for the devices that would be upgraded, I was then required to accept the new 2 year agreement for both devices and after doing so I was required to end the call. I did so in an orderly fashion and expected a confirmation # to arrive in my email regarding the placed order.
    I have never received a confirmation email. I decided to sleep on it and assumed a confirmation email would be sent sometime tomorrow. Nothing has since been received however. I woke up early this morning around 6AM Alaska time to speak to another live chat representative, Bryan, in the billing department who assured me the order was currently processing and verified the order #. I asked him whether or not it was typical for a customer to not receive a confirmation email for an order placed and he said it can sometimes take up to 2-3 business days. He then stated that he had taken note of the issues I was experiencing and told me he would transfer me to the sales department as they would be able to provide more information regarding the shipment of both devices and a confirmation email, as he stated he did not want me to have to wait any longer than necessary to receive said devices.
    I was then transferred to Devon in the sales department via the live chat service where I was then required to repeat everything I had said to both Bryan and the other representatives I had spoken too. After a lengthy discussion and repeating everything I have just wrote he told me the order was indeed processing and that he would send a confirmation email in the next 30 minutes.
    That was 2 hours ago. It is now 8am Alaska time and I still have not received a confirmation email regarding my order. I was sent an email by Verizon an hour ago stating I had a device to "discover". The email contained no information regarding the shipment of my device, the order confirmation number, or anything regarding my account. The email I received was a typical spam email asking an individual to check out the current available phones and sign up for a new contract.
    All I want is a confirmation email to assure that the devices are being sent. I need my phone for work and to communicate with my family in the lower 48. I desperately need to make sure that the device is in fact being sent to the proper address, this is why a confirmation email of the order is so important. I do not care about the shipping speed I just want what I ask to be taken care of for a change. I would hate to sit here unable to determine what the status of my devices are only for the order to be stuck in "processing" limbo and be unable to receive the devices when I was told they would be sent.
    I feel I have been given the run around treatment way more than is typically given with any company when an individual is trying to work towards a solution. I have been patient and cordial with everyone I have spoken with, I have not raised my voice or shown stress or anger towards the situation I have only tried my best to work towards a solution with anyone I have spoken too but I am becoming increasingly frustrated with this situation.
    Any help regarding this matter would be greatly appreciated. This situation has left a sour taste in my mouth and if the devices were indeed not actually processed in an order, or they were not shipped correctly, or in fact if the order had never existed at all it will only deter me from keeping my Verizon account active and affect my decision to switch to another provider.

        Hello APVzW, we absolutely want the best path to resolution. My apologies for multiple attempts of replacing the device. We'd like to verify the order information and see if we can locate the tracking number. Please send a direct message with the order number so we can dive deeper. Here's steps to send a direct message: http://vz.to/1b8XnPy We look forward to hearing from you soon.
    WiltonA_VZW
    VZW Support
    Follow us on twitter @VZWSupport

  • Issue regarding Planning layout is not getting rendered and is dumping at : CL_RSDRC_TREX_QUERY_LAYER ~ _GET_PARTPROVS_WITH_TREX_PART in SAP TPM IP

    Gurus,
    I am facing an issue regarding SAP TPM IP ( HANA)
    I have 3 Infoproviders
    Planning infocube, Planning DSO1, Planning DSO2 and i created multiprovider and added these 3 infoproviders into it. I have created Aggregation level on multiprovider. Created Bex Input ready query on Aggregation level.
    Issue is  Planning layout is not getting rendered and is dumping at : CL_RSDRC_TREX_QUERY_LAYER ~ _GET_PARTPROVS_WITH_TREX_PART.
    I tried debugging it and found it is trying to read   i_r_pro -> n_ts_part. It is populated with only 3 values (i.e. 2DSOs and 1 Cube), whereas <l_partprov>-partprov is referring to Aggergation level, hence read statement isn't successful, it is dumping.
    The class CL_RSD_INFOPROV_CACHE->GET() method is trying to populate the N_TS_PART.N_TS_PART uses P_R_INFOPROV table which seems to be already populated.  So, I debugged all the below methods to find out how the P_R_INFOPROV but couldn't find any clue.
    Can any one help,it would be really help.
    Thanks
    Ashok

    Hello Gregor,
    On the launch of planning layout it throws an error message:
    Planning is not possible RSCRM_IMP_CORE008.
    When I debugged, i got to a point wherein
    particular Real Time Planning DSO is
    not getting retrieved under the MultiProivder in below class.
    Class: CL_RSCRM_IMP_ACTIONS_SERVICE, Method: GET_INFOPROV is not
    returning the real time Info-Provider Name(i.e. Planning DSO)
    underlyingthe Multiprovider.
    I've also tried to run the report mentioned by you for the Multiprovider but issue still exists.
    Let me know, if you have any pointers on this topic.
    Thanks,
    Jomy

  • Have an issue regarding library books. My ereader is validated with Kobo account and Adobe Digital Editions account, but I get an error: 'this document is protected bij DRM and isn't available with your Adobe ID'.

    Have an issue regarding library books. My ereader is validated with Kobo account and Adobe Digital Editions account, but I get an error: 'this document is protected bij DRM and isn't available with your Adobe ID'.

    same problem for me. I am using abe edition 3 as I don't think 4 can be used with kobo. Book has been downloaded to kobo but it can't be read as it is not authorised.Help please

  • Payroll issue regarding the Claims - /561 and /563

    Hi Payroll Experts,
    I have a payroll issue regarding the Claims - /561 and /563 (October PY Run)
    When i m runnning the Current month Payroll(October PY Run), Total Earning - total deductions are not matching with Net Pay. later i came to know that the system creates the WT /561 and deducts from the Net Pay.
    But as per the Employee Payment Details , there is no recovery required from the employee for the past one year. But even then the system creates the WT /561. and deducts the same from NET Pay.
    The followng are the WT details
    IN - Period
    OCT 2011
         /101 Total gross amount     118,897.00
         /110 Net payments/deductions     76,070.00-
         /550 Statutory net pay     95343
         /551 Stat.net recalc.diff.     37,692.00-
         /552 Stat.net subs.adjustment      37,692.00-
         /559 Bank transfer                                                   34,317.00
         /560 Net pay     37,218.00
         /563 Claim from previous month     5,609.00
    FOR Period
    Sept- Oct
         /101 Total gross amount     49,213.00
         /110 Net payments/deductions      31,721.00-
         /550 Statutory net pay     41,529.00
         /551 Stat.net recalc.diff.     14,591.00
         /552 Stat.net subs.adjustment     23,101.00-
         /553 Recalc.diff.to last payr.     37,692.00
         /559 Bank transfer                                                   14,591.00
         /560 Net pay     14,591.00
         /561 Claim     5,609.00
    I request  some body to  throw siome light on the same.

    Hi Experts,
    Thanks for everyone for replying to my query ,
    I have a doubt that If you check the WTs /551 and /552  in the IN PRD, the negative sign is coming for both the WTs
    Is it correct?
    And also, Assume that there may be a master data changes like Bank details and other deduction Wts happened in the month of Aug and now i m going to run the payroll for the month of Nov,
    some of the employees having differences in the Net Pay, Eventhough the employee is having sufficient balances.
    So how do i handle this issue
    IS ther any way to solve this differences?
    Please Let me know how to solve this issue.
    Thanks

  • SAP QM Issues regarding follow-up action after Usage Decision

    Dear Gurus -
    Kindly need your expertise to resolve these issues regarding follow-up action.
    1. After taking the UD i need to trigger the follow-up action to send an email with the long text to a group of people. As per standard SAP the email goes to the person taking the UD. Kindly can some one explain what & where do i need to make the changes. Also please let me know what is the customized Email ID table where mail ID's will be stored which fuction module can extract.
    2. Can i also use the same functionality for partial lots during inprocess inspection. I need to send an email to a group in case the valuation is rejected for that operation.
    Any response is highly appreciated.
    Thank You.
    Edited by: sunil t on Jan 6, 2010 7:03 PM

    Hi
    Please go through my recent thread
    Incomming Inspection Auto mail if Rejected
    Regards
    Sujit

  • HT1365 Hi can anyone help with this issue regarding my wireless magic mouse? When im on google chrome and scrolling down the page i always have youtube running in the background but the audio cuts/spits/pops can anyone help me with this?

    Hi can anyone help with this issue regarding my wireless magic mouse? When im on google chrome and scrolling down the page i always have youtube running in the background but the audio cuts/spits/pops can anyone help me with this?

    The figures you mention only make sense on your intranet.  Are you still using the same wireless router.  The verizon one is somewhat limited as far as max wireless-n performace.  For one thing it only has a 2.4 radio.   I like many people who wanted wireless-n performance before they even added a wireless-n gigabit router, have my own handling my wireless-n network.

  • Issue regarding job SAP_CCMS_MONI_BATCH_STARTUP_DP

    Hi,
    We are facing an issue regarding an event triggered job SAP_CCMS_MONI_BATCH_STARTUP_DP.
    Details of the job
    ABAP Program -> RSAL_BATCH_TOOL_STARTUPDISP
    User -> DDIC
    Job Frequency -> Event Periodic
    Event -> SAP_MONITORING_STARTUP_DISPATCH
    We performed Database Refresh and this job has come from Source System. We have deleted the job in Target System but after that also we are getting continuous error message in SM21.
    Error message is as follows:
    14:33:36 DIA  001 000 SAPSYS                EA  S Failed to reschedule a periodic job
    14:33:36 DIA  001 000 SAPSYS                EB  C > Job SAP_CCMS_MONI_BATCH_STARTUP_DP
    On digging down we got the below information in SM21 regarding the error:
    Documentation for system log message EA S :
    This message is output by one of the job schedulers active in the
    system (e.g. time or event-based scheduler). It indicates a problem
    related to the database. An attempt was made to reschedule a periodic
    job and write the respective control data in the database. This error
    occurred for one of the associated database operations (for example,
    INSERT or UPDATE).
    Another cause of the error is failure to generate a new job ID number.
    A subsequent message will point this out.
    The following courses of action are possible:
    Check whether there are any other notes on this problem next to this
    message in the system log, for example direct messages from the
    database interface. These details generally bring you closer to the
    actual cause of the problem.
    The additional information for this message contains the name of the
    database table for which the error occurred.
    If you determine that the error occurred during the SELECT access to
    table TBTCI, the internal report belonging to this background job has
    been deleted. In this case, there is normally a background job in the
    'terminated' status, which ended due to runtime error
    'LOAD_PROGRAM_NOT_FOUND'. Delete this job to prevent further
    unnecessary scheduling on the part of the background processing
    scheduler. You must then reschedule the job concerned.
    As rescheduling of the periodic job could not be completed
    successfully, this job is not executed at first. The background
    processing scheduler takes this job and attempts to schedule it again.
    Depending on the repetition period, gaps in running the background jobs
    can occur for successful scheduling (i.e. the background jobs that were
    unsuccessfully scheduled will be missing in the job overview if their
    execution date elapsed in the meantime).
    Since the next start of the periodic job could not be scheduled
    correctly, there is no entry in the job overview for the planned start
    date.
    If the system failed to generate the job ID number, you will find notes
    on what to do next in the long text of the respective system log
    message.
    We have fixed also Background Object in SM61.
    Kindly help to fix this issue. Looking forward for reply.
    Thanks,
    Soumya

    I am also facing similar issue  . I found below SM21 entries daily . becoz of this my system  performance becomes slows down. no idea which tables are getting filled up  due to this .
    > Job SAP_CCMS_MONI_BATCH_STARTUP_DP
    Failed to reschedule a periodic job
    For temporary fix we have changed the below memory parameters when system performance is poor .
    EM/TOTAL_SIZE_MB = 16384
    ES/SHM_SEGS_VERSION = 2
    ES/TABLE = SHM_SEGS
    But we need to fix these system log entries as still we are getting these errors. If anybody knows the permanent fix of this error that will be great for us.
    Regards
    Krishna

  • Issue regarding consecutive run for an Interface

    hi all,
    i have an issue regarding an interface
    if this Interface is a initial run for the file, you have to populate all the data of the people. That is , unlike other interfaces where we send only the latest record, in this interface we need to send all the records of the employees. in a employee has 10 records with different dates, we will pick up all the records greater than 1999 and pass it. whereas if there is a change in one field, then we will send all the record of that file. And If it is a consecutive run  then you have to populate changes only. the following algorithm can help you in this
    if intial_run EQ 'X'
    transfer IT_FINALDATA to XI.
    else
    Declare a 2 more internal tables similar to IT_FINALDATA...for our below example let us assume that
             DATA: IT_CLUSTERDATA type standard table of IT_FINALDATA.
             DATA: IT_COMPAREDATA type standard table of IT_FINALDATA.
    use the following statement to retrieve the data from cluster and comparing it
            IMPORT IT_CLUSTERDATA TO IT_COMPAREDATA  FROM DATABASE indx(zn) ID 'IN_8085'.
            Compare IT_COMPAREDATA with IT_FINALDATA
    If sy-subrc = 0.
    Means there are no changes, and no output required
    Else
    Pass the data to XI interface,  And store the internal table in the same INDX table, using the following statement
    EXPORT IT_FINALDATA to  IT_CLUSTERDATA FROM DATABASE indx(zn) ID 'IN_8077'.
    Endif.
    In this  can we deliver the changed data at every single consecutive run.
    Please let me  know,
    Thank Q
    Rohini.

    This is something where HR Interface Toolbox (PU12) can be very helpful, it will take care of changes from one run to another and you can configure it to send changes only in next run. But, you will need some ABAP in its user exits to restrict the data after 1999, and any other restrictions that you might want.

  • Issue regarding [Work Flow] Business Object Event Raise in ABAP Program

    Hi All,
    I have one issue regarding [Work Flow] Business Object Event Raise in ABAP Program.
    Actual TDS is as below:
    If E message type written, raise Business object BUS2005 (Production order) Event PickShortage for production order passing warehouse, transfer request
    (BUS2065 Object key) in event container. Also include table of text version of error
    messages for this set of Transfer
    Request.
    Can anybody tell me how can i write it technically in ABAP Code.
    Can anybody solve this issue!
    Thanks in advance.
    Thanks,
    Deep.

    Hi,
    Can anybody solve above posted issue!
    Thanks,
    Deep.

  • Issue Regarding Transfer Rules

    Hi All,
    We have an issue regarding Transfer Rules. We are loading Data using 0FI_GL_4 into ZFIGL_A01. It is a periodic load of data.
    Last month due to some issue in R/3 we have to replicate the Data Sources and retransport the Transfer Rules from BW Dev to BW Production. Next we loaded data into the InfoCube. Now when we execute the report for the current period I am not getting Master Data Values. All are coming as Not Assigned.
    We have tracked down the issue and found that the issue may be incorrect mapping of Tranfer Rules. Is there any way in Prd where we can revert back to old version of Transfer Rules or can find the old mappings in Transfer Rules.
    Regards
    Jay

    Hi Jay,
    The only way you can find your old transfer rules mapping is to goto RSA1 -
    > Infosource -> Tools -> Program and compare the versions .
    Bye
    Dinesh

  • Issue regarding to change taxcode in tab Gl-account for T.cod MIR7

    Hi Expert,
    I have issue regarding Tax code in Tab Gl-account for t.cod MIR7 which come by-default , i wan to change that taxcode based on purchase order number which also have tax code with multiple line item in tab PO Refrence,,i want first taxcode of tab PO Refrence to be copied in first line item of tab GL-account  based on po number ,can anyone put a light on this issue with priority..
    Regard's,
    shaikh khalid.

    Hi,
    You can clear the old items posted in 28000 with the other leg in suspense / clearing GL Account.
    Once the above is done, please post once again to Vendor clearing the suspense / clearing account.
    Ensure that the suspense / clearing account does not have any open items.
    The lines are transfered to new recon account.
    Hope this helps, if yes, please assign points.
    Regards,
    Sankar

  • Issue regarding the Finder

    I went to the Disk Utility and performed a "verify disk permissions", after which I ran the repair disk permissions. After that it said something was modified and it would not be repaired.
    I've been having some odd issues lately, namely, System Preferences and Adobe Acrobat Reader hanging on me. Then it prevents me from shutting down properly.
    Does anybody know what is happening and how I might resolve the issue below?
    01/12/08 8:51:23 PM Disk Utility[166] Warning: SUID file "System/Library/CoreServices/Finder.app/Contents/Resources/OwnerGroupTool" has been modified and will not be repaired.
    01/12/08 8:51:31 PM Disk Utility[166] Group differs on "private/etc/cups", should be 0, group is 26.
    01/12/08 8:51:31 PM Disk Utility[166] Permissions differ on "private/var/spool/cups/cache/rss", should be drwxr-xr-x , they are drwxrwxr-x .

    mjrblood wrote:
    I went to the Disk Utility and performed a "verify disk permissions", after which I ran the repair disk permissions. After that it said something was modified and it would not be repaired.
    I've been having some odd issues lately, namely, System Preferences and Adobe Acrobat Reader hanging on me. Then it prevents me from shutting down properly.
    Does anybody know what is happening and how I might resolve the issue below?
    01/12/08 8:51:23 PM Disk Utility[166] Warning: SUID file "System/Library/CoreServices/Finder.app/Contents/Resources/OwnerGroupTool" has been modified and will not be repaired.
    01/12/08 8:51:31 PM Disk Utility[166] Group differs on "private/etc/cups", should be 0, group is 26.
    01/12/08 8:51:31 PM Disk Utility[166] Permissions differ on "private/var/spool/cups/cache/rss", should be drwxr-xr-x , they are drwxrwxr-x .
    First "verify" is a total waste of time - - either do nothing or repair, but never verify. Verify is pointless.
    Those messages are to be ignored and have nothing to do with your shutdown issue.
    A quick search of these boards will reveal dozens of threads about the SUID and cups things.
    Ignore them. As they say, they are "warnings" not errors and have been around since an early Leopard update.
    Look in your console logs for the real issues regarding Acrobat and System Preferences hanging up.
    Check your login items.
    Create a new user account and see if the hangs occur with the new account.

  • I set up the the sync add on and had no errors.When I sync now I get"Sync encountered an error while syncing:Firefox sync server maintenance is underway..."I have gotten this mesaage for the last 10 hours.Should I wait or is there an issue with my setup?

    I just loaded Firefox onto my laptop. I set up the the sync add on and had no errors. When I hit sync now I get "Sync encountered an error while syncing: Firefox sync server maintenance is underway, syncing will resume automatically." I have gotten this message for the last 10 hours. Should I wait or is there an issue with my setup? I checked the Mozilla sync server status and it listed no issues.

    There was a server out last week. see below. now everything works great. thanks for the follow up.
    To:
    Subject: [Bug 744289] sync107.db.scl3 down
    Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
    https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744289
    Gregory Szorc [:gps] <[email protected]> changed:
              What    |Removed                     |Added
                Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
            Resolution|                            |FIXED
               Summary|error in sync               |sync107.db.scl3 down
         Last Resolved|                            |2012-04-10 19:39:11
    --- Comment #2 from Gregory Szorc [:gps] <[email protected]> 2012-04-10
    19:39:11 PDT --- Well, this is embarrassing. It looks like one of our
    servers was down and for whatever reason we didn't notice.
    It should be working now. If you still see errors, please reopen this bug.
    Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
    ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Activated AT&T Pre3, wifi now, but App Catalog doesn't work?

    [copied here from Precentral post/thread: http://forums.precentral.net/hp-pre-3/303421-activated-t-pre3-wifi-now-but-app-catalog-doesnt-work.h... ] Hey there, Just a couple of days ago, with a borrowed AT&T SIM, I activated a GSM Pre3, creating a new

  • Deleting messages on iPhone won't delete on .Mac

    I have an issue where if I delete an email on my iPhone and then log in to .Mac mail, I still see the message there. Further inspection shows that the message is in the .Mac trash AND in the inbox - almost like the message was copied rather than move

  • Local_sync_key merep_111

    Could anybody tell me, why i have two entries on table MEREP_111 with the same local_sync_key for the same id_mobile???

  • ROW_BASED_TARGET_ONLY

    Is it possible that a mapping in ROW_BASED_TARGET_ONLY mode would process no records on the same data that the same mapping in ROW_BASED mode would load some data from? The mapping will do insert / update, so it's supposed to process the same data se

  • Where to buy a S12 power adapter, and any cheaper option?

    I enjoy using my new Lenovo S12 ION, but getting tired of bring the power adapter to workplace everyday. So I was thinking of getting an additional power adapter. Where can I buy one? And is there any cheaper option (knowing that genuine Lenovo one i