Issue regarding the customer specific price

Hi Guru:
Please see my case as below:
1 I created the table condition 805 (sold to specific price) and 806 (ship to specific) and had assigned these two table conditions to the access sequence ca01,and I created the condition type ca01,I assigned the access sequence ca01 and price procedure caa001 in it,and finally I maintained them in ovkk with the specific sales organization/distribution/division channel.
2 Then I maintained the price condition type via vk11 as below,please note that sold to 1 linked with ship to 16,
sold to 1 ,material 64,50 eur/kg
ship to 16,material 64,55 eur/kg
3 And I went to the transaction va01 and was going to place the sales order for them to have a test,it looks good for picking 1 as sold to as well as ship to,and the price of material 64 is 50 eur/kg
But when I chose customer 1 as sold to whereas 16 as ship to,the price of the material 64 still be 50 eur/kg
My question is that normally the price of ship to specific should override the one with sold to specific,so based on my example above,the price of material 64 should be 55 eur/kg
So am I missing something in customization? Please help to fix!

Hi,
U have assigned Access Seq - tables in following sequence as per result u have written
805 Exclusive Ticked
806 Exclusive Ticked
Now in both tables records maintained ...
Now when u run order .. system goes to first table --- condition record found so it will never go to second table which is Ship to.
Hence the way you have defined logic is wrong.
Desired Logic - If u need that if Ship to Diferent frm sold to then pick price from ship to or if ship to and sold to are same pick price from sold to.
If this is what u had desired. then u can maintain only one table with Ship-to and maintain prices for all ship to. so even the sold to in sap is ship to unless we specify seperately so if u maintain for all ship to the result will be as u desired like
Condition record in Ship to table - (delete sold to table from access seq)
1. Customer 1 - 50
2. Customer 2 - 55
Now if u run order and give sold to 1 then by default ship to = 1 so price 50 now if u chnage ship to in this order to 16 then price will be 55.
Regards
Krishna

Similar Messages

Customer specific prices in Catalog SAP ERP E-Commerce

Hi Experts,
We have implemented SAP ERP E-commerce -- ECC 6.0 ISA 5.0
Initially we implemented a B2B scenario without TREX engine.
VMC component is active (IPC).
In the catalog we don't see customer specific prices. What are the steps to enable customer specific prices in the catalog.
Do we need TREX engine ?
Do we need catalog views for customers to get customer specific prices.
Please advice.
Thanks and Regards,
Ram

Hello Ram,
Maybe have a read of thread Prices on Product catalog for e-Commerce R/3 this contains some helpful information.
regards
Mark

Issue in Updating Customer specific fields in WBS using BAPI_BUS2054_CREATE_MULTI

Hi Experts,
I am able to create the WBS element using BAPI_BUS2054_CREATE_MULTI.But the issue is i am not able to update customer specific fields even after passing the fields as per specification in Function module documentation. I have also created an implementation of BADI as per below specification in FM documentation:
Procedure for Filling Standard Enhancements
Before you call the BAPI for each object that is to be created or changed,
for which you want to enter customer-specific table enhancement fields, add a
data record to the container ExtensionIn:
STRUCTURE: Name of the corresponding help structure
VALUEPART1: Key of the object + start of the data part
VALUEPART2-4: If required, the continuation of the data part
VALUPART1 to VALUPART4 are therefore filled consecutively, first with the
keys that identify the table rows and then with the values of the
customer-specific fields. By structuring the container in this way, it is
possible to transfer its content with one MOVE command to the structure of the
BAPI table extension.
Note that when objects are changed, all fields of the enhancements are
overwritten (as opposed to the standard fields, where only those fields for
which the respective update indicator is set are changed). Therefore, even if
you only want to change one field, all the fields that you transfer in
ExtensionIn must be filled.
Checks and Further Processing
Using the methods ...CREATE_EXIT1 or. ...CHANGE_EXIT1 of the BAdI
BAPIEXT_BUS2001, BAPIEXT_BUS2002, and BAPIEXT_BUS2054, you can check the entered
values (and/or carry out other checks).
In the BAdI's second method, you can program that the data transferred to the
BAPI is processed further (if you only want to transfer the fields of the CI
includes, no more action is required here).
But still i am unable to update fields though i am able to create WBS with rest of the fields except custom fields.
I am using attached code to achieve this.Do we need to code anything inside method create_exit1 or create_exit2 implementation for BADI or
Please help on priority

Hi Rahul,
First observation from your code is that i could not find the assignment for the field
GWA_WBS_EXTIN-STRUCTURE. I hope you are not filling this field, that could be one reason for failure. Try to do it and let us know if you still have the problem.
Br..
Dwaraka

Customer specific price maintanance

Hi experts,
we already maintained one base price for customers on price group base. Again my client want to introduce Customer specific price (how shall i maintain) Is there any condition records maintance for these customers, pls guide me how to proceed.
Meera

Hello,
the combination of fields for which it is possible to insert a price, depends on the access sequence assigned to the condition type.
For example access sequence PR00 allows to insert prices with combinations:
Customer/Material
Price List Type/Currency/Material
Price List Type/Currency/Material
Material
Best rgards,
Ivano.

Payroll issue regarding the Claims - /561 and /563

Hi Payroll Experts,
I have a payroll issue regarding the Claims - /561 and /563 (October PY Run)
When i m runnning the Current month Payroll(October PY Run), Total Earning - total deductions are not matching with Net Pay. later i came to know that the system creates the WT /561 and deducts from the Net Pay.
But as per the Employee Payment Details , there is no recovery required from the employee for the past one year. But even then the system creates the WT /561. and deducts the same from NET Pay.
The followng are the WT details
IN - Period
OCT 2011
     /101 Total gross amount     118,897.00
     /110 Net payments/deductions     76,070.00-
     /550 Statutory net pay     95343
     /551 Stat.net recalc.diff.     37,692.00-
     /552 Stat.net subs.adjustment      37,692.00-
     /559 Bank transfer                                                   34,317.00
     /560 Net pay     37,218.00
     /563 Claim from previous month     5,609.00
FOR Period
Sept- Oct
     /101 Total gross amount     49,213.00
     /110 Net payments/deductions      31,721.00-
     /550 Statutory net pay     41,529.00
     /551 Stat.net recalc.diff.     14,591.00
     /552 Stat.net subs.adjustment     23,101.00-
     /553 Recalc.diff.to last payr.     37,692.00
     /559 Bank transfer                                                   14,591.00
     /560 Net pay     14,591.00
     /561 Claim     5,609.00
I request some body to throw siome light on the same.

Hi Experts,
Thanks for everyone for replying to my query ,
I have a doubt that If you check the WTs /551 and /552 in the IN PRD, the negative sign is coming for both the WTs
Is it correct?
And also, Assume that there may be a master data changes like Bank details and other deduction Wts happened in the month of Aug and now i m going to run the payroll for the month of Nov,
some of the employees having differences in the Net Pay, Eventhough the employee is having sufficient balances.
So how do i handle this issue
IS ther any way to solve this differences?
Please Let me know how to solve this issue.
Thanks

Is TREX required for the customer specific catalog views in SAP ERP E-com

Hi gurus,
I see there are few ramp-up sap notes for enabling the customer specific catalog views of Product catalog in SAP ERP E-commerce scenario.
Any one who has already implemented them know if TREX is mandatory for having catalog views?
specifically for XECOM 5.0 and ECC 6.0
Thank you

See [Note 696095 - ISA R/3 4.0: Collective note on Catalog Views|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/696095]
See the first line in the Reasons and Prerequisites:
Important: The catalog views functionality is only available from ISA 4.0 SP4 on, we recommend to use the latest SP. It is also only available with TREX as catalog engine
This is true for recent versions too.
The requirement is behind how the solution is implemented. VIEWS_ID is actually published to TREX for optimized extraction of customer views.

Regarding the Customer Proprietary Network Information Notice

>> Duplicate post removed to comply with Verizon Wireless Terms of Service. See Regarding the Customer Proprietary Network Information Notice <<
Message was edited by: Verizon Moderator

You do realize you opted in the day you signed up for verizon, right? As for certain parts, you can opt out via your my verizon

The scope of the customer-specific authorization object

Dears,
Could someone please feedback about the scope of the customer-specific authorization object; e.g. if we are to create a customer-specific authorization object to replace authorization object P_ORGIN in the HR module, to be able to add an extra authorization field to the newly created authorization object, the scope of the newly create authorization object (which will have a new validation code generated by report RPUACG00) will be the whole ERP system ?
The worry is caused by the fact that P_ORGIN is already used in several authorization roles granted to users in the different ERP modules (i.e. FI, SD, MM, CS), so the replacement would affect these modules.
Thanks.
Reda

Hello Reddy,
We are about to implement the HCM module (We are now in the testing
phase), on the same client as that of our SAP ERP implementation.
We need to authorize on the personnel number grouped by 'Payroll Area'
in transactions PA30, PA40
In authorization object P_ORGIN, the field VDSK1 is already used to
authorize on an attribute : cost center (organizational key) for each
organizational unit, so we can't configure it to authorize on other
fields from info type 0001 (e.g. Payroll Area).
We need to continue using the conventional / general authorization and
not the structural authorization, to stay in compliance with our
authorization schema already implemented in our FI, MM, SD & CS modules.
( Also, as per thread : Steps for creating structural authorization profile using trans. OOSP
the structural authorization cannot be used to authorize on Payroll Area.)
We need to go through the HR module implementation without any changes
in the ABAP code.
So, the last way out is the custom-specific authorization object, and as I mentioned before, the authorization object P_ORGIN was already used in other ERP modules; e.g. FI, MM, SD & CS,
( Note : I haven't started yet implementing this solution.)
Thanks.
Reda

Issues with the Custom Filter in Datasheet View

I'm seeing some odd, yet intermittent, behavior while trying to filter columns in datasheet view using a custom filter. After clicking to apply a filter to a column and choosing 'Custom Filter...' a pop-up with regular expressions should appear much like
the following screenshot:
However sometimes, usually on a page refresh, this pops up instead:
I have been able to replicate this sporadically in both IE 8 and 9 against different columns but it's really inconsistent. I can't seem to find any configuration issues or commonality across the clients that might be responsible. Local installations of Office
are 32bit. I know 64bit has been known to cause some issues. I wanted to see if anyone else has run into this issue at all or perhaps it has been addressed in a more recent CU than what I am running (14.0.6117.5002). Any insight would be much appreciated,
thanks in advance.

Hello all
We get this as well on one computer in the office. It seems to be more of an MS Office issue than a Sharepoint issue specifically the "Microsoft Office List 14.0" ActiveX add in.
On one computer that has Office 2010, when "Edit in Datasheet" is clicked within a Sharepoint list the MS office list 14 ActiveX is called and the custom filter options appear with the missing combo boxes like in the picture at the top. I've found this is
reproducible by simply doing:
1. Visit a Sharepoint list
2. Actions > Edit in Datasheet
(If you click one of the drop downs at this point and choose Custom filter it will open as expected)
3. Actions > Show in standard view
4. Actions > Edit in Datasheet
5. Click one of the drop downs, choose Custom filter and the problem will occur
The only way to make the option reappear is to close down IE and reopen it. You'll then get one more go with point 1 and 2 above before the problem will reoccur again after changing the view using Actions.
Anyone using Office 2007 doesn't seem to have this problem however this uses a different version of the control namely "Microsoft Office List 12.0"
Uninstalling Office 2010 and reinstalling it seems to fix it for a bit but the problem will soon come back. Strangely it won't come back straight away but when it does its easy to reproduce following the above steps.
Testing this on another computer that just happens to have Office 2010 and Sharepoint Designer 2007 installed the problem does not occur however when the ActiveX is called for the Sharepoint list it just happens to invoke the Office List 12 version despite
the fact both versions are available on the machine.
This probably happens because Sharepoint Designer was installed after Office 2010 was installed on the machine so has updated the registry to call the older version which seems to be problem free.
ActiveX files
Microsoft Office List 12.0 = C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office12\STSLIST.DLL
Microsoft Office List 14.0 = C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office14\STSLIST.DLL
Version 14.0.6015.1000 - came with Office 2010 with SP1
I've tried patching version 14.0 STSLIST.dll to:
14.0.6130.5000 (KB2589349)
14.0.6137.5000
(KB2760804) - 9th April 2013 and is the newest I could find at the time.
Edit as I'm typing this: Just found http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2817403 which is dated 11th June 2013 but doesn't mention any fix for this problem.
I've tried installing the Sharepoint services support components using the Sharepoint Designer installer package as below:
This includes the STSLIST.dll version 12.0 and updates the registry accordingly so that this component is referenced and does seem to fix the problem.
Unfortunately for me, when I checked back later the browser had reverted back to using the 14.0 component for reason I can't explain. Perhaps a Windows update came through and "adjusted" the registry settings to use the newer version. Unfortunately any attempt
at deleting the 14.0 file simply recreates it when "Edit in Datasheet" is choosen.
It would be great to get a proper fix for this instead of having to try and force the computer to use the older component!

Want the Customer specific validations at the time of asset posting

Dear all,
I want to implement Customer specific validations at the time of asset posting(ABZON , F-90 , F-91).Please tell which user-exit should I use??
AINT0004 is working only for ABZON.
AINT0001 is not as per my requirements!!
Regards,
Amiya

Hi Amiya ,
u can achieve thru Validations / Substitutions OB28. But u have limitations in the implementations of Logic .
regards
Prabhu

Creating the customer specific catalog view....

Hi All,
I am working for e-Commerce with mySAP ERP scenario where the customer wants to implement customer specific Catalog View. As it is not a standard functionality provided by SAP. So, I was searching through the SAP notes on how to implement it and found the note 998453 and 998458 which details on how this can be achieved.
I implemented the relevant SAP Notes i.e. 998453, 998458, 677319 and 677320 in a system. However, the appropriate result is not appearing. This is my perception; some customizing setting will also be required for the same. Moreover would be the possibility, I have missed some technical steps.
On this regards only, Could you provide me some reference documents or suggestion based upon these notes which help me in implementation? Apart form that, Could you suggest me any another approach for implementing the catalog view? This is really great help from your end.
Regards,
Ashutosh Jain

it is done...

Issue regarding the Finder

I went to the Disk Utility and performed a "verify disk permissions", after which I ran the repair disk permissions. After that it said something was modified and it would not be repaired.
I've been having some odd issues lately, namely, System Preferences and Adobe Acrobat Reader hanging on me. Then it prevents me from shutting down properly.
Does anybody know what is happening and how I might resolve the issue below?
01/12/08 8:51:23 PM Disk Utility[166] Warning: SUID file "System/Library/CoreServices/Finder.app/Contents/Resources/OwnerGroupTool" has been modified and will not be repaired.
01/12/08 8:51:31 PM Disk Utility[166] Group differs on "private/etc/cups", should be 0, group is 26.
01/12/08 8:51:31 PM Disk Utility[166] Permissions differ on "private/var/spool/cups/cache/rss", should be drwxr-xr-x , they are drwxrwxr-x .

mjrblood wrote:
I went to the Disk Utility and performed a "verify disk permissions", after which I ran the repair disk permissions. After that it said something was modified and it would not be repaired.
I've been having some odd issues lately, namely, System Preferences and Adobe Acrobat Reader hanging on me. Then it prevents me from shutting down properly.
Does anybody know what is happening and how I might resolve the issue below?
01/12/08 8:51:23 PM Disk Utility[166] Warning: SUID file "System/Library/CoreServices/Finder.app/Contents/Resources/OwnerGroupTool" has been modified and will not be repaired.
01/12/08 8:51:31 PM Disk Utility[166] Group differs on "private/etc/cups", should be 0, group is 26.
01/12/08 8:51:31 PM Disk Utility[166] Permissions differ on "private/var/spool/cups/cache/rss", should be drwxr-xr-x , they are drwxrwxr-x .
First "verify" is a total waste of time - - either do nothing or repair, but never verify. Verify is pointless.
Those messages are to be ignored and have nothing to do with your shutdown issue.
A quick search of these boards will reveal dozens of threads about the SUID and cups things.
Ignore them. As they say, they are "warnings" not errors and have been around since an early Leopard update.
Look in your console logs for the real issues regarding Acrobat and System Preferences hanging up.
Check your login items.
Create a new user account and see if the hangs occur with the new account.

Regarding the Customer and Vendor insurance

Hi Gurus,
My client is dealing with food materials,the requirement of the client is he will take an insurance policy say for 1cr and is valid accross India.The moment any sale or purchase takes place and which is transported in a truck,the invoiced amount should be automatically deducted from the policy and the system should warn them if the amount or validity date is near lapse so that they can renew the policy.
If any customer is picking the goods then the amount should not be deducted from the policy.Can anyone please help me in this issue.
Thanks in advance,
Ramesh.
Edited by: malladirb on Jul 28, 2011 7:18 AM
Edited by: malladirb on Jul 29, 2011 11:37 AM

Dear Sreenivas,
My client deals with food materials.He buys the raw materials from farms and transports from different locations to the main plant where the material is processed.Similar is the scenario with the sales.The customers of the Client r in different locations in the country.The requirement here is,if the client sells or procures any material which involves transportation by a truck (in case of any accident taking place) he can claim the insurance for the amount.
What ever the amount which is invoiced in the above explained scenarios should be deducted from the insurance policy which is an Inland Transit Insurance policy and similar is the case with the expots also.
I hope my explanation is clear to u.
Thanks & Regards,
Ramesh.

Issue from the Customer about the Autogeneration - Any one Solve It.

Hi all,
     (Please Read it Carefully and give a Solution to this Urgently)
     I developed one Screen ' Purchase Order '. I wrote the Code to generating autonumber for Purchase Order.When you have to open the 'Purchase Order' the autogenerated number is shown like this 'DOC-XXXXX'.
         There is only one record is stored on the Purchase Order table which is 'DOC-00001'.
         When we open the Purchase Order Screen at two Machine.it will shown the autogenerated number 'DOC-00002' on two Machine. I make to save the transaction of the Screens on two machines one by one and Saved Successfully.
<b> First transaction has a autogeneration number 'DOC-00002' and Second one has a 'DOC-00003'.
But In UI Part, Before Saving it shown the document number 'DOC-00002' for both screen. This it the Ultimate problem customer will faced on Multi-user envirnoment on Network.</b>
Any one tell How to Overcome this issue?????
Please Help Me,
Regards,
Suresh.G

Hi Suresh,
What you can do is, show a message when you save the second purchase order.
This is what SAP does for system objects.
For example:
I open two PO screens (in add mode). Both show Document number as 5.
Then I save the forst PO. When I save the second PO, SAP shows a message telling actaul document number saved was 6.
Thanks
Kishor.

Regarding the Custom screen

hai friends,
            how to dispaly the ouput of ALV in Custom screen.
Regards,
selvamuthukumar

Hi,
Following Sample Code will help you in this way, i am using SCREEN 1 and SCREEN 2
Screen one there is a field where user enter the Number of Records he want to show from KNA1
than on SCREEN 2 there is CONTAINER where Record show as ALV
Flow Logic SCREEN 1
process before output.
module status_0001.
process after input.
module exit_command_0001 at exit-command.
chain.
    field: tf_rec_no.
    module user_command_0001.
endchain.
Flow Logic SCREEN 2
process before output.
module status_0002.
module display_alv.
process after input.
module exit_command_0002 at exit-command.
module user_command_0002.
report zfsl_rget_from_kna1_scr_class.
tables: kna1, zsdo.
data: tf_rec_no(10).
*PARAMETERS: ptablen(10).
data: git_kna1 like standard table of kna1 with header line,
      wa_git_kna1 like kna1,
      go_grid type ref to cl_gui_alv_grid,
      go_custom_container type ref to cl_gui_custom_container.
call screen 1.
*&      Module STATUS_0001 OUTPUT
*       text
module status_0001 output.
set pf-status 'ZFSL_KNA1_SCR_CLASS'.
* SET TITLEBAR 'xxx'.
endmodule.                 " STATUS_0001 OUTPUT
*&      Module USER_COMMAND_0001 INPUT
*       text
module user_command_0001 input.
if tf_rec_no ca 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz-'.
    message 'Please enter the Valid Number' type 'E'.
elseif tf_rec_no = 0 and tf_rec_no <> space.
    message 'Please enter the Number other than 0 (ZERO)' type 'I'.
elseif tf_rec_no <> space.
    clear: git_kna1[], git_kna1.
    select * from kna1 up to tf_rec_no rows
      into corresponding fields of table git_kna1.
    if sy-subrc = 0.
      modify screen .
      call screen 2.
    endif.
endif.
endmodule.                 " USER_COMMAND_0001 INPUT
*&      Module exit_command INPUT
*       text
module exit_command_0001 input.
data: ok_bt1 type sy-ucomm.
*        ok_bt2 TYPE sy-ucomm.
case ok_bt1.
    when 'BACK'.
      clear ok_bt1.
      leave to screen 0.
    when 'EXIT'.
      clear ok_bt1.
      leave program.
    when 'CANCEL'.
      clear ok_bt1.
      leave to transaction 'ZFSLSCB'.
endcase.
endmodule.                 " exit_command INPUT
*&      Module STATUS_0002 OUTPUT
*       text
module status_0002 output.
set pf-status 'ZFSL_KNA1_SCR_CLASS'.
* SET TITLEBAR 'xxx'.
*clear: go_custom_container.
* CALL METHOD go_grid->refresh_table_display.
if go_custom_container is initial.
    create object go_custom_container
      exporting
        container_name = 'ALV_CONTAINER'.
    create object go_grid
      exporting
        i_parent = go_custom_container.
endif.
perform load_data_into_grid.
endmodule.                 " STATUS_0002 OUTPUT
* MODULE exit_command_0002 INPUT
module exit_command_0002 input.
data: ok_bt2 type sy-ucomm.
*        ok_bt2 TYPE sy-ucomm.
case ok_bt2.
    when 'BACK'.
      clear ok_bt1.
      leave to screen 0.
    when 'EXIT'.
      clear ok_bt2.
      leave program.
    when 'CANCEL'.
      clear ok_bt2.
      leave to transaction 'ZFSLSCB'.
endcase.
endmodule.                 " exit_command INPUT
*&      Module USER_COMMAND_0002 INPUT
*       text
module user_command_0002 input.
endmodule.                 " USER_COMMAND_0002 INPUT
*&      Form load_data_into_grid
*       text
form load_data_into_grid.
*    SELECT * FROM kna1 UP TO tf_rec_no ROWS
*      INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE git_kna1.
call method go_grid->set_table_for_first_display
    exporting
      i_structure_name = 'KNA1'
    changing
      it_outtab        = git_kna1[].
endform.                    "load_data_into_grid
Please Reply if any Issue.
Kind Regards,
Faisal
Edited by: Faisal Altaf on Feb 17, 2009 7:28 PM

Issue regarding the customer specific price

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for