Issue while posting through MIRO

Hi,
I am posting through MIRO.
I am using two POs in MIRO from different contracts.
When I add them for one PO amount and QTY feild is filled up properly,
but for other the value of QYT is filled into amount and qty field.
Could any one help in solving this issue.
Thanks in advance.

Hi
You ae trying to post two POs from different contracts (i assume for same vednor)
When you allocate the first PO, everythin is fine
when you subsequently allocate the second PO, the vale and qty fields are not populated properly.
Is this right?
What values are going to the qty and value fields of second PO?

Similar Messages

How to add line items to Accounting Document posted through MIRO ?

I need to perform Additional posting when Posting through MIRO transaction..i tried with INVOICE_UPDATE BADI but this was not useful...Please let me know if there is any way to add additional posting to Accounting Document created through MIRO.
If any user exit , BADI ot BTE present?

Hi,
Check the BTE's:
00001020     POST DOCUMENT:       Prior to final checks             SAMPLE_INTERFACE_00001020
00001025     POST DOCUMENT:       Final checks completed       SAMPLE_INTERFACE_00001025
00001030     POST DOCUMENT:       Posting of standard data     SAMPLE_INTERFACE_00001030
00001050     POST DOCUMENT:       Accounting interface           SAMPLE_INTERFACE_00001050
Thanks & Regards,
Harish

Field Profit Center is not populated while posting through T-Code F-02

Dear Sir / Madam,
While posting through T-code F-02 the field Profit center is in hidden mode
as a result I am getting the given below error.
"GLT2201 - Balancing field profit center in line item 001 not filled"
Please guide me as to how do I change Field status varient so that the field Profit center gets activated in optional mode in F-02.
I tried searching the same but could not find the solution.
Regards
Chirag Shah

Dear expert
Check following steps...
1. Use transaction ACSET and enter cost center as your account assignment for type 01 APC posting..
2. Make sure Cost Center exists in the Asset Master..
3. Make sure profit center is entered into Cost Center master.
4.Check the steps where you assign the GL accounts to the splitting rules.
suggest you to go through the below mentioned links
Balancing Field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled
Balancing field "profit center" in line item 001 not filled
GLT2201 - Balancing field profit center in line item 001 not filled
Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled
F-51: Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled
Balancinf field profit center in line item 001 not filled
Regards,
Ajeesh.s

Issue while posting the invoice in background using the WF-BATCH user

Hi Friends,
I am facing an issue while posting the invoice in background using the WF-BATCH user. I am using a invoice approval workflow where in when the approver approvers the invoice the invoice document get posted using a background method, which uses BO FIPP and Method POST and i am returning the Message Text to my workflow container from this method. When i see the log an exception is rasied from this method with an error message "V004: You are not authorized to change this document", but WF-BATCH is having SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW authorizations. If i try to post the invoice using the method from my user id it is getting posted. What could be the issue. Please advice.

Hi Sapient,
The Parameter, Roles would be different for the LOGIN USER and WF-BATCH.. So ask your administrator
to set the Roles & Parameters similar to that of LOGIN USER to WF-BATCH.
For further refrence check in SU01 giving the LOGIN USER and then check with WF-BATCH... you would
find the difference...
Hope this would help you..
Good luck
Narin

Invoices posted through MIRO

Hello All
Does anyone know which table the documents posted through MIRO are held in?. I am particulery interested in the payment block flag. I have an invoice where it differs from the finance document
I have already check tables BSIK and BSAK
Thanks
Prakash

Hi Prakash,
The Accounting document of the invoice created thru MIRO will be saved in BKPF and BSEG.
AS

Document splitting issue while posting MIRO transaction

Hello All
I have a piculiar related to document splitting while posting MIRO entry and this issue started after defaulting the profit center
to the tax gl.
The scenario is like this
While posting a vendor invoice document where there is a difference in the invoice value and stock is allready consumedn
hence system will try to post the difference to the material difference account.
The following is the asccounting entries
01 vendor a/c cr   1000
02 gr/ir a/c dr         800       pc from po document
03 tax g/l                 180       default pc
04 inventory diff       20
the error message
system is not able to determine the profit center at line item 04 and message is
Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 004 not filled
The document splitting settings are all standards related to vendor invoice ..................
One important point to be noted here is that this issue is come after defaulting the profit center at tax gl.
But we cannot remove those default pc also.
Can be their any solution on this
Kindly suggest
Thanks

Hi
In addition to my previous mail i want to add that
i tried to add even expense item category to splitting rule of business transaction and transaction variant.
Even then it doers not work.
other then is as per standard document splitting rule the expense item category is not included in invoice verication buisness transaction.
Thanks
alok

Dealer Excise Invoice-Issue while posting MIRO

Dear All,
Today i was doing Domestic procurement with Dealer for Gas Cylinder. In PO we entered total value which includes Excise amount also (1000+103)& VAT @ 14% (154,42).
While doing GR i selected as Only captured excise inv, checked MRP indicator.
Changed the bse value to 1000, entered BED as 100, E Cess as 2 & SEcess as 1.
The accounting entries were correct, Inventory is posting with Rs 1000
Posted excise invoice in J1IEX, the values were coming from GR, its correct and the acc entries were also OK with 103 Cenvat clearing acc Cr & Excise acc Dr.
While posting MIRO, I am facing problems...
In line item i am getting as 1103 Base value...
VAT is calculating on (1103+103) @ 14% 168.84,
so total value is 1271.84
When i simulate, its showing
Vendor 1271.84 Cr
GR/IR clg acc 1000 Dr
Material 103 Dr
VAT 168,84 Dr
There is no cenvat clearing account here
Please help me how to resolve this.
Regds,
CB
When i simulate

Hi,
have you mainatin 100% setoof condition check it it should be there
check MIRo posting date and excise invoice posting date
check condition record validity in FV13
Regards
Kailas Ugale
Edited by: kailasugale on Feb 10, 2012 12:01 PM

Asset in incomplete while posting invoice MIRO

Hi All,
I have raised an P.O with account assignment 'A' P.O has created but while posting invoice through t.code Miro i am getting the error 'asset co.code xxxx asset no.xxxxxx is incomplete.
let me know were i need to check.

Hi Ganee,
The asset for which you are doing MIRO, the error might be due to the following reasons:
1. Check the depreciation Key.
2. Check the Account Determinations (Ao90)
You can do resolve your error.
Regards
VG

Asset posting Through MIRO

hai
while posting asset through MIRO , i am getting problem like
mean amount 5892.56 inr exceeds low value asset maximum amount".
can any body tell me ,how can i solue this.
use points points will be assain.
thanks
ram

chek wht is the maximum amount given for low value asset... i.e is 5000 if u try to post more amount it wont allow u....so just change the amount in maximum amount or select another asset
U can do the check the amount entered for low value asste and for any change go to
spro-- financial accounting-- asset accountingvaluationamout specifications--specify max. amount for low value asset
or t.code OAYK
system will allow you..
thanks
sejal

Getting Error while posting through KB11N : No true sender object entered

HI Expert,
We have stastical internal order defined and same we are using in Asset. Let me explain the scenarion.
We created the Purchase requisition with the stastical Internal Order then we did Purchase Order and MIGO -Goods Receipt.
Now we realised that wrong Internal Order was used. Now we want to tranasfer cost from that Internal order to New Internal Order. we are trying to post through KB11N but while giving the all details i am getting error as per below;
No true sender object entered
Message no. BK175
Diagnosis
You have entered a statistical object as a sender. Statistical objects, however, are only intended for use with dual account assignments.
Procedure
1. If you require a dual account assignment, enter a true object as a sender also.
We are using cost element with having cost element category 90.
I don't no which is the true sender Object.
Thanks in advance
ealry help will be highly appreciated.

Your postings had happened to a statistical internal order. I hope the real postings might have happened to a cost centre.
You cannot settle anything from a statistical internal order. It is just for information purpose only. If the above posting had captured a cost centre (real posting), you can distribute/assess the cost from the cost centre to a real internal order for your purpose.

While posting through MIGO accounting problam

hai guys,
while posting normal NB type p.o through MIGO ,iam getting error message saying as" period 12/2006is not possible for account type S and G/L 400000"
i have checked period of closing through MMPV,MMRV,OMSY.
every thing is allowing , but iam getting error.
can pls give me what might be the problam.
thank u.

Hi
This is related to FI module.
First you check what is variant assigned to your company code in OBBP transaction.
Then go to OB52 transaction and check for particular variant Accounting type S, change period to current.
regards
Srinivas

Issue while posting message to queue

Hi ,
I am getting following exception while posting message into queue.For every new build I am getting this exception and after 2 or 3 times of restart of corresponding OBPM related weblogic server,Issue is getting resolved
A component failed while executing activity '/COM/OU/UserlProcess#Default-3.0/ComponentExecution[PreProcessor]' (BP-method preProcessor) over instance '/COM/OU/UserlProcess#Default-3.0/15141/0'.
Details:
The task could not be successfully executed.
Reason: 'fuego.connector.ConnectorException: Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
Detail:Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
Caused by: Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
Detail:Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
Caused by: Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] returned the wrong class [com.tibco.tibjms.naming.TibjmsConnectionFactoryAttributes] for a resource of type [2].
Detail:Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] returned the wrong class [com.tibco.tibjms.naming.TibjmsConnectionFactoryAttributes] for a resource of type [2].
fuego.lang.ComponentExecutionException: The task could not be successfully executed.
Reason: 'fuego.connector.ConnectorException: Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
Detail:Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
     at fuego.server.execution.EngineExecutionContext.invokeMethodAsCil(EngineExecutionContext.java:1091)
     at fuego.server.execution.EngineExecutionContext.runCil(EngineExecutionContext.java:1277)
     at fuego.server.execution.microactivity.ComponentExecutionMicroActivity.runCil(ComponentExecutionMicroActivity.java:126)
     at fuego.server.execution.microactivity.ComponentExecutionMicroActivity.execute(ComponentExecutionMicroActivity.java:84)
     at fuego.server.execution.microactivity.MicroActivityEngineExecutionHandler.executeActivity(MicroActivityEngineExecutionHandler.java:57)
     at fuego.server.execution.ImmediateActivity.execute(ImmediateActivity.java:42)
     at fuego.server.execution.DefaultEngineExecution$AtomicExecutionTA.runTransaction(DefaultEngineExecution.java:304)
     at fuego.transaction.TransactionAction.startNestedTransaction(TransactionAction.java:527)
     at fuego.transaction.TransactionAction.startTransaction(TransactionAction.java:548)
at fuego.transaction.TransactionAction.start(TransactionAction.java:212)
     at fuego.server.execution.DefaultEngineExecution.executeImmediate(DefaultEngineExecution.java:123)
     at fuego.server.execution.DefaultEngineExecution.executeAutomaticWork(DefaultEngineExecution.java:62)
     at fuego.server.execution.EngineExecution.executeAutomaticWork(EngineExecution.java:42)
     at fuego.server.execution.ToDoItem.executeAutomaticWork(ToDoItem.java:251)
     at fuego.ejbengine.ItemExecutionBean$1.execute(ItemExecutionBean.java:217)
     at fuego.server.execution.DefaultEngineExecution$AtomicExecutionTA.runTransaction(DefaultEngineExecution.java:304)
     at fuego.transaction.TransactionAction.startBaseTransaction(TransactionAction.java:470)
     at fuego.transaction.TransactionAction.startTransaction(TransactionAction.java:551)
     at fuego.transaction.TransactionAction.start(TransactionAction.java:212)
     at fuego.server.execution.DefaultEngineExecution.executeImmediate(DefaultEngineExecution.java:123)
     at fuego.server.execution.EngineExecution.executeImmediate(EngineExecution.java:66)
     at fuego.ejbengine.ItemExecutionBean.processMessage(ItemExecutionBean.java:203)
     at fuego.ejbengine.ItemExecutionBean.onMessage(ItemExecutionBean.java:115)
     at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.execute(MDListener.java:466)
     at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.transactionalOnMessage(MDListener.java:371)
     at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.onMessage(MDListener.java:327)
     at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.onMessage(JMSSession.java:4123)
     at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.execute(JMSSession.java:4013)
     at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession$UseForRunnable.run(JMSSession.java:4541)
     at weblogic.work.SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl$WorkAdapterImpl.run(SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl.java:464)
     at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:200)
     at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
Caused by: fuego.connector.ConnectorException: Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
Detail:Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
at fuego.connector.ConnectorException.exceptionOnGetResource(ConnectorException.java:95)
     at fuego.connector.ConnectorTransaction.getResource(ConnectorTransaction.java:324)
     at fuego.connector.ConnectorTransaction.getResource(ConnectorTransaction.java:298)
     at fuego.connector.JMSHelper.getSession(JMSHelper.java:75)
     at fuegoblock.msg.DynamicJMS.sendMessage(DynamicJMS.java:145)
     at xobject.Utility.JMSService.writeToAppQueue(JMSService.xcdl:11)
     at xobject.Utility.Notification.sendAuditNotification(Notification.xcdl:19)
     at XXX.ManualProcess.Default_3_0.Instance.CIL_preProcessor(Instance.xcdl:20)
     at XXX.ManualProcess.Default_3_0.Instance.CIL_preProcessor(Instance.xcdl)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
     at fuego.server.execution.EngineExecutionContext.invokeMethodAsCil(EngineExecutionContext.java:1082)
     ... 31 more
Please help how can I resolve this issue
Thanks
Sailendra

I am also getting the same issue. Sailendra, did you resolve the issue?
If not could anyone help us to resolve this issue.
I am using Tibco JMS for queue and I have set 'ConnectionFactory' as Connection Factory Lookup Name value in the external resourse.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ramanan

Workflow not starting for invoice posting through MIRO...

Hi,
I have a blocked invoice workflow in Release status. The business object BUS2081 is used and POSTED event is activated in the workflow.
Hello Gurus,
Now when I try to post invoice through MIRO, the workflow does not start. I go to top called service for object icon and click on Workflow, but I cannot see the workflow started.
Please help.
Regards,
Rajesh.

Hi
This was already discussed. Check in SWEL Tcode whether the Posted Event is getting triggered or not. If not then find out whether this event gets triggered automatically or through Coding. If thru coding check ur code. If thru config check ur config.
Please close thread when this gets resolved

Error while posting through tcode tbb1

Hi All,
While trying to post through TBB1, I'm getting the following error message:
" S.E.201 Profit Center 001"
While debugging I noticed that the FM 'TB_DEAL_FIX_POST' is returning an error in its error flag.
Wating for your replies.
Regards,
Arnab

hi,
please check this link ,it will help you
http://72.14.235.132/search?q=cache:V0BoGC09gZAJ:help.sap.com/bp_hightechv1600/HighTech_DE/Documentation/H83_BPP_EN_DE.docerrorSerialnumberislockedbyUserwhilepostingthrough+MIGO%2Bsap&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=10&gl=in
Thanks and regards
Durga.K

Dummy Profit center issue while posting the transaction in FB60

Dear SAP friends,
We have implemented ECC6.0 version,
I have the below issue:
I am posting the document in FB60 transaction: after simulating the document system is throwing the error "Profit center 9937/FIREPRODMY does not exist for 14.08.2009"
Message no. KM700
Document spilitting active at Business area level..
In 0KE5( maintain controlling area settings) I have not given the Dummy profit center.
Eventhough it is asking for Dummy profit center while posting, Please let me know apart from the 0Ke5 settings do i need to remove the dummy profit center anywhere in the Config.
I have not maintained any settings in FAGL3KEH, 3KEH and OKB9.
No sunstitutions are active in the system.
Please let me know from where i need to remove the dummy profit center.
My client going live on 17th Aug 2009.
Regards,
Anand

Hi,
Check the validity period of the Profit Center 9937/FIREPRODMY. The valid from period should have the date same or earlier than 14.08.2009
If not then change the profit center master data to be valid from an earlier date (Tcode KE52). Steps-
KE52 - Profit Center FIREPRODMY
Click Change Validity Period (Ctrl +F1)
Valid from - put a date earlier or equal to 14.08.2009
Click Activate (Shift + F1)
Thanks,

Issue while posting through MIRO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for