Issue while posting using goods issue for delivery type NL

Hello Experts,
I have created an outbound delivery for an intra-company transfer (within same company code) between two plants. The delivery type in NL (replinishment delivery)
When i am trying to post the goods issue from supplying plant, I am getting following error
"Account type K is not defined for document type WL".
Delivery type NL should not be used to issue stock to vendor but I am not issuing it to any external vendor , issuing the stokc only to a receiving plant.
Please help to understand why i am getting this error.
Regards,
Nish.

Hi,
If you are doing an STO Scenario, Check whether you have created the supplying plant as a vendor.
The Vendor Account group should be plants.
Also check whether you have given the plant in the vendor master Purchasing Data - Extras tab in the menu click on add purchasing data & check.
If you haven't assigned this, do the same & create a fresh STO & check.
Hope it will work.
Thanks & Regards,

Similar Messages

Components were not consumed while posting the goods receipt through VL32N

Hi Experts,
We are into technical upgrade. We are upgrading from 4.7 to ECC 6.0. We are facing one issue. The issue is while posting the goods receipt for the subcontracting shceduling agreement through VL32N (Inbound Delivery) component materials were not consumed. While displaying the material document for the GR, could not find any compponent materials consumed with movement type 543, where as if I use the MIGO transaction code for the same inbound delivery, I could see the component materials were consumed with movement type 543.
Could anybody tell us how to fix this issue if they come across.
Appreciate your reply.
Regards
Bala

Hi,
Try checking below SAP notes
Note 645119 - Problems with subcontracting using delivery
338119 - Goods receipt in inbound delivery for SC order
Hope this helps
Reg
Dheeraj

Error while posting the Goods Receipt

Hi Friends,
I am having an issue while posting the Goods Receipt.
I am getting the error "Balance not zero: 1.000,00- debit: 0,00 credit: 1.000,00". I am using the Purchase Order with Account Assignment category P and K. When ever I used the account assignment category, I am getting this type of error. I have checked the configuration and every thing is OK. System is not able to debit the G/L account which is mentioned in the Purchase Order, hence the problem. However, I think system is able to get the G/L account (to Credit the amount) from Automatic Account determination.
Would like to know if any one come across similar type of problem and resolved it.
We have recently upgraded the system from 4.7 to ECC 6.0.
Apprciate the help.
Thank you,
Prakash

Hi
Thank you for the reply.
I have checked what you have mentioned. While creating PO it is determining the G/L account automatically through the assignments in OBYC. Even then I am getting the error while doing the Goods Receipt.
Any one is having any idea?
Thank you,
Prakash
Edited by: Prakash KM on Dec 17, 2010 6:26 PM

Posting multiple goods issues against the same delivery

Hello gurus,
We are a fashion apparel company using ECC 6.0 and would like to know if it is possible to post mutliple goods issues against the same delivery?
I will explain the business requirement.
- We create a stock transport order to deliver 400 units of merchandise to on or our retail stores (STO is created and processed to a delivery).
- This information is passed down to our warehouse management system (which is not SAP)
- Our warehouse management system has the ability to split a delivery into multiple shipment when needed. For example, our warehouse may only be able to complete 250 units for our morning shipment and will therefore pick, pack and post this. This will feed back into SAP and process a 641 movement so that the units now show as "in transit". This is needed so that our stores can process the ASN and move the units into their inventory when they receive the merchandise later that day.
- During the afternoon, our warehouse will process the remaining 150 units and will ship this to our store later in the evening or next day.
Currently, we are not able to process another goods issue against a delivery as we close out the delivery during the first goods issue. We would prefer not to have to generate a new delivery for our DC and let them continue to process against the same delivery, but we are unsure how to configure this.
Any help or guideance would be extremely appreciated
Thanks in advance

Hi RJ,
First of all sorry to write such a lengthy reply,In one line if i want to summerize then it is not possible with standard SAP however we can achieve this by writing some piece of code in both the system
AS - IS
               Business process
          From business process point of view you are right that once the pick & pack is in process it is not advisable to create a new delivery document for balance quantity and share the same with WMS as then they have to create a new document in WMS and start picking based on that rather then the old delivery document number. if i am in your position then i can give a thought like this
e.g.
Delivery                                                  - 100 Unit
Shipment confirmation from WMS            -   60 Unit
Change in delievry quanity / Pick qty        -   60 Unit
Invoice from SAP                                    -   60 Unit
Second confirmation from WMS                          -   40 Unit
Change in the existing delivery quantity                -   Now here we have two option either
1) Change the delivery quantity / Pick qty to (60+40) =100 or
2) Remove the 60 and update 40 as delivery and pick quantity
Pros & Cons
if you will select option 1 then furhter invoice will happen for 100 unit which is incorrect as physically you are shipping only 40 unit
if you are selecting option 2 then the document flow is incorrect as you don't have history(in SAP) for the 60 unit which was shipped earlier
Solution ::
so in my opinion the best option is to create a seperate delivery document (store the old delviery number in one of the field of the new delivery and pass the same to custom segment of the IDoc) transmit the IDoc to WMS write the validation logic in WMS
Find the record with old deliver number in the WMS system, check the status whether it is active or inactive
if it is acitive Validate the Material + qty with the WMS record(Material + balance quantity) if both are same then pass the new deliery number to custom field of the WMS table
At the time of confirming back to the SAP, Write a piece of code in SAP that if the incoming idoc custom field(new delivery number) field is populated then ignore the orignal document number and post the document using the new delivery document number
Hope this help

Post a good issue against an outbound delivery with movement type 601 K

Hello,
according to my business scenario I need to manage the stock of different vendors into the client's location (plant) at storage location level and I need to post the good issue against an outbound delivery to decrease the stock level.
Since the owner of the goods isn't my client the item is managed only at quantity level (not value) so I'm not interesed in the accounting document.
To do it I'm using the functionality related to the vendor consignment stock but I'm not able to post the good issue against an outbound delivery using the movemement type 601 and the special stock indicator equal to K.
In particular I've tried in two different ways:
- setup the consignment stock indicator (= K) into the sales item category, but when I post the goods issue the system is not able to find out the right vendor
- to create a stock determination rule instead of the setting previous described, but the system display an error message (Fld selectn for mvmt type 601 / acct L534200770 differs for Cost center (010) ) even if the accouting is not relevant in my scenario
Can you suggest me how the system has to be setup in order to cover my requirements?
Thanks in advance,
Alessandro

Hi,
Please clarrify which material type you are using in this scenario? I suggest you to use material type UNBW (no value updation will be there) and create a material master. Use special stock indicator K. Proceed with 601K to do GI. Hope it works. Thanking you.

Issue while posting the invoice in background using the WF-BATCH user

Hi Friends,
I am facing an issue while posting the invoice in background using the WF-BATCH user. I am using a invoice approval workflow where in when the approver approvers the invoice the invoice document get posted using a background method, which uses BO FIPP and Method POST and i am returning the Message Text to my workflow container from this method. When i see the log an exception is rasied from this method with an error message "V004: You are not authorized to change this document", but WF-BATCH is having SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW authorizations. If i try to post the invoice using the method from my user id it is getting posted. What could be the issue. Please advice.

Hi Sapient,
The Parameter, Roles would be different for the LOGIN USER and WF-BATCH.. So ask your administrator
to set the Roles & Parameters similar to that of LOGIN USER to WF-BATCH.
For further refrence check in SU01 giving the LOGIN USER and then check with WF-BATCH... you would
find the difference...
Hope this would help you..
Good luck
Narin

How to amend a do an post a goods issue by using BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CONFIRM

Dear All,
As advised in this forum ,I want to used BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CONFIRM_DEC to amend my DO and post a goods issue. However, I keep getting error message "error in document 80000970 item 000010 (quantity consistency check)"
code:
DATA:
W_HEADER_DATA LIKE BAPIOBDLVHDRCON,
W_HEADER_CONTROL LIKE BAPIOBDLVHDRCTRLCON,
DELIVERY_NUM LIKE BAPIOBDLVHDRCON-DELIV_NUMB,
W_ITEM_DATA LIKE BAPIOBDLVITEMCON,
I_ITEM_DATA LIKE BAPIOBDLVITEMCON OCCURS 0,
I_RETURN LIKE BAPIRET2 OCCURS 0.
DATA :
W_RETURN LIKE BAPIRET2,
L_RETURN LIKE SY-SUBRC.
PERFORM OUTBOUND_DELIVERY
CHANGING
    L_RETURN.
FORM OUTBOUND_DELIVERY
CHANGING
        L_OUT_RETURN   LIKE SY-SUBRC.
DATA:
V_LOGSTR(128)    TYPE C.                       "LOG ÄÚÈÝ
DELIVERY_NUM = '80000970'.    "DO NUMBER
"HEAD DATA PART
W_HEADER_DATA-DELIV_NUMB = '80000970'.
W_HEADER_DATA-GROSS_WT = 240.
W_HEADER_DATA-NET_WEIGHT = 240 .
W_HEADER_DATA-UNIT_OF_WT = 'G'.
"HEAD DATA CONTROL PART
W_HEADER_CONTROL-DELIV_NUMB = '80000970'.
W_HEADER_CONTROL-GROSS_WT_FLG = 'X'.
W_HEADER_CONTROL-NET_WT_FLG = 'X'.
W_HEADER_CONTROL-VOLUME_FLG = 'X'.
W_HEADER_CONTROL-POST_GI_FLG = 'X'.
"ITEM DATA PART
CLEAR W_ITEM_DATA.
W_ITEM_DATA-DELIV_NUMB = '80000970'.
W_ITEM_DATA-DELIV_ITEM = '000010'.
W_ITEM_DATA-MATERIAL = '0015223'.
W_ITEM_DATA-BATCH = '20040202'.
W_ITEM_DATA-DLV_QTY = 1.
W_ITEM_DATA-SALES_UNIT = 'CAR'.
APPEND W_ITEM_DATA TO I_ITEM_DATA.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CONFIRM_DEC'
EXPORTING
    HEADER_DATA                = W_HEADER_DATA
    HEADER_CONTROL             = W_HEADER_CONTROL
    DELIVERY                   = DELIVERY_NUM
TABLES
HEADER_DEADLINES           =
    ITEM_DATA                  = I_ITEM_DATA
    RETURN                     = I_RETURN
LOOP AT I_RETURN INTO W_RETURN.
    IF W_RETURN-TYPE = 'E'.
      L_OUT_RETURN = 4.
      MESSAGE   ID     W_RETURN-ID
                TYPE   W_RETURN-TYPE
                NUMBER W_RETURN-NUMBER
                WITH   W_RETURN-MESSAGE_V1
                       W_RETURN-MESSAGE_V2
                       W_RETURN-MESSAGE_V3
                       W_RETURN-MESSAGE_V4
                INTO   V_LOGSTR.
      WRITE :/ V_LOGSTR.
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
ENDFORM.
Does anybody have a hint to the cause of the error message?
There's no problem to do a goods issue manually in VL02n for the delivery.
Best Regards,
ERIC XU

Hi Lin,
   he has changed the commit value to 'X' in DEBUG mode.
If you just want to test it in se37, you have to keep a break point in the WS_DELIVERY_UPDATE_2 fm, and give the value of COMMIT = 'X' in debugging.
If you want to do the same in a program, you have to cal the fm: bapi_transaction_commit after the call to the BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CONFIRM_DEC bapi.
Regards,
ravi

While doing the goods issue system is thruoghing an erro message no VL621

hi ,
actually while doing the goods issue we had put a validation if that filed(serial number) is not valid.like AVAILABLE then the system has through to an error message.but after that error message system is throughing an nother error.
Risk of posting several mat.documents for one delivery->long text
    Message no. VL621
Diagnosis
    Processing has been terminated because there is the risk that the system
    creates several material documents for this delivery.
Procedure
    If this message occurs frequently, please note the exact situation and
    procedure as well as error messages and inform the system administrator.
and we changed that error to warning also still we are getting that error message.
how to stopthis error message.

hi actually not for serial number check.
there is a Z field in serial number master which is used for SIM number.
that SIM number will be validated with available SIM number from another Z table.
after this SIM error system is throughing this VL621 error after transaction terminated message.

BAPI to post a Goods issue with relation to Sales Order?

Hi Everyone,
After creating a delivery order, I need a BAPI to automatically post a goods issue for this DO.
I tried using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE but it returns the message 'Goods Movement not possible with mvmt type 601'.
Any advice?
Best Regards,
Junwen

Hi John,
My data are as follows:
GOODSMVT HEADER:
PSTNG_DATE: 30.09.2004
DOC_DATE: 30.09.2004
REF_DOC_NO: had tried 1014000359 or empty
GOODSMVT_CODE: 03
GOODSMVT_ITEM:
MATERIAL: HP0121002
PLAN: 1010
STGE: 10FG
BATCH: BATCH1
MOV: 601
CUSTOMER: 180017
ENTRY_QNT: 1
ENT_UOM: PC
ENT_UOM_ISO: PC
DELIV_NUMB: 1014000359
DELIV_ITEM: 000001
From your feedback, it is possible to use the BAPI to create a goods issue for movement type 601?
Best Regards,
Junwen

Post a goods issue

Hi Everyone,
After creating a delivery order, I need a BAPI to automatically post a goods issue for this DO.
I tried using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE . I haven't errors but the Goods issue has not been posted for the delivery.
Any advice?
Best Regards,
Nadia

One way is possible, but it has also negative aspects:
You can set back the current period to a required period. There is a init repor in the customizing of MM. I would set the current one back to june, so you could post im may.
After done this, the normal period report for setting the next month can be run.
But: doing this, current values and the last period are at least the same. You loose one historical period....
I would try this in a test system.
Regards
Uwe Werner

Issue while posting message to queue

Hi ,
I am getting following exception while posting message into queue.For every new build I am getting this exception and after 2 or 3 times of restart of corresponding OBPM related weblogic server,Issue is getting resolved
A component failed while executing activity '/COM/OU/UserlProcess#Default-3.0/ComponentExecution[PreProcessor]' (BP-method preProcessor) over instance '/COM/OU/UserlProcess#Default-3.0/15141/0'.
Details:
The task could not be successfully executed.
Reason: 'fuego.connector.ConnectorException: Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
Detail:Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
Caused by: Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
Detail:Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
Caused by: Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] returned the wrong class [com.tibco.tibjms.naming.TibjmsConnectionFactoryAttributes] for a resource of type [2].
Detail:Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] returned the wrong class [com.tibco.tibjms.naming.TibjmsConnectionFactoryAttributes] for a resource of type [2].
fuego.lang.ComponentExecutionException: The task could not be successfully executed.
Reason: 'fuego.connector.ConnectorException: Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
Detail:Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
     at fuego.server.execution.EngineExecutionContext.invokeMethodAsCil(EngineExecutionContext.java:1091)
     at fuego.server.execution.EngineExecutionContext.runCil(EngineExecutionContext.java:1277)
     at fuego.server.execution.microactivity.ComponentExecutionMicroActivity.runCil(ComponentExecutionMicroActivity.java:126)
     at fuego.server.execution.microactivity.ComponentExecutionMicroActivity.execute(ComponentExecutionMicroActivity.java:84)
     at fuego.server.execution.microactivity.MicroActivityEngineExecutionHandler.executeActivity(MicroActivityEngineExecutionHandler.java:57)
     at fuego.server.execution.ImmediateActivity.execute(ImmediateActivity.java:42)
     at fuego.server.execution.DefaultEngineExecution$AtomicExecutionTA.runTransaction(DefaultEngineExecution.java:304)
     at fuego.transaction.TransactionAction.startNestedTransaction(TransactionAction.java:527)
     at fuego.transaction.TransactionAction.startTransaction(TransactionAction.java:548)
at fuego.transaction.TransactionAction.start(TransactionAction.java:212)
     at fuego.server.execution.DefaultEngineExecution.executeImmediate(DefaultEngineExecution.java:123)
     at fuego.server.execution.DefaultEngineExecution.executeAutomaticWork(DefaultEngineExecution.java:62)
     at fuego.server.execution.EngineExecution.executeAutomaticWork(EngineExecution.java:42)
     at fuego.server.execution.ToDoItem.executeAutomaticWork(ToDoItem.java:251)
     at fuego.ejbengine.ItemExecutionBean$1.execute(ItemExecutionBean.java:217)
     at fuego.server.execution.DefaultEngineExecution$AtomicExecutionTA.runTransaction(DefaultEngineExecution.java:304)
     at fuego.transaction.TransactionAction.startBaseTransaction(TransactionAction.java:470)
     at fuego.transaction.TransactionAction.startTransaction(TransactionAction.java:551)
     at fuego.transaction.TransactionAction.start(TransactionAction.java:212)
     at fuego.server.execution.DefaultEngineExecution.executeImmediate(DefaultEngineExecution.java:123)
     at fuego.server.execution.EngineExecution.executeImmediate(EngineExecution.java:66)
     at fuego.ejbengine.ItemExecutionBean.processMessage(ItemExecutionBean.java:203)
     at fuego.ejbengine.ItemExecutionBean.onMessage(ItemExecutionBean.java:115)
     at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.execute(MDListener.java:466)
     at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.transactionalOnMessage(MDListener.java:371)
     at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.MDListener.onMessage(MDListener.java:327)
     at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.onMessage(JMSSession.java:4123)
     at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.execute(JMSSession.java:4013)
     at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession$UseForRunnable.run(JMSSession.java:4541)
     at weblogic.work.SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl$WorkAdapterImpl.run(SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl.java:464)
     at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:200)
     at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
Caused by: fuego.connector.ConnectorException: Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
Detail:Connector [MAIN_Q:null:JMS] caused an exception when getting a resource of type [7].
at fuego.connector.ConnectorException.exceptionOnGetResource(ConnectorException.java:95)
     at fuego.connector.ConnectorTransaction.getResource(ConnectorTransaction.java:324)
     at fuego.connector.ConnectorTransaction.getResource(ConnectorTransaction.java:298)
     at fuego.connector.JMSHelper.getSession(JMSHelper.java:75)
     at fuegoblock.msg.DynamicJMS.sendMessage(DynamicJMS.java:145)
     at xobject.Utility.JMSService.writeToAppQueue(JMSService.xcdl:11)
     at xobject.Utility.Notification.sendAuditNotification(Notification.xcdl:19)
     at XXX.ManualProcess.Default_3_0.Instance.CIL_preProcessor(Instance.xcdl:20)
     at XXX.ManualProcess.Default_3_0.Instance.CIL_preProcessor(Instance.xcdl)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
     at fuego.server.execution.EngineExecutionContext.invokeMethodAsCil(EngineExecutionContext.java:1082)
     ... 31 more
Please help how can I resolve this issue
Thanks
Sailendra

I am also getting the same issue. Sailendra, did you resolve the issue?
If not could anyone help us to resolve this issue.
I am using Tibco JMS for queue and I have set 'ConnectionFactory' as Connection Factory Lookup Name value in the external resourse.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ramanan

Error when posting an goods issue of movement type 501: order not contain

I tried to post an goods issue of movment type 501 to a stock transport order. But I get the error as below.
Document 4500000130 does not contain any selectable items
Message no. M7 064
Diagnosis
The document or item entered cannot be adopted.
Possible reasons for this are:
The document items have already been processed
(Suggest zero lines indicator set?).
the document items have been deleted or are blocked.
the document items have been created for a different plant.
(for reservations only) movements are not yet allowed for the reservation items.
(for reservations only) the document items are retrograde components of the order. These are posted using the order confirmations.
The document is an R/2 document.
Procedure
Make sure your entries are correct.
If the system has already processed the total quantity, you can set the Suggest zero lines indicator. The system will suggest the quantity zero for the items that have already been processed.
If you have entered a particular item, cancel the item. If you do not enter an item, the system searches all of the open items in the document.
If the document is a purchase order, production order or a reservation, you can enter search criteria in the dialog box.
You access the dialog box by choosing the menu option Enter with reference on the initial screen.
If the document is an R/2 document, you have to cancel it manually by entering the reversal movement type.
How can I proceed to post?
Thanks,
Eda

Hi
Go to T.code MB1A, enter the required movement type, Plant and storage location and then click,
The push button of Reservation on the tool bar for refereing the reservation or
The push button of order on the tool bar for refereing the Production order.
Cheers
Kris

Error Code "-5002" While adding a Goods Issue Document

Hi,
While adding a goods issue document for only a specific combination of items I get "Internal Error (-5002) occured" message.
The scenario is i am adding 5 rows with following specification
Row1- Serial Managed Item
Row2- Batch Managed Item
Row3- Managed by none
Row4- Batch Managed Item
Row5- Serial Managed Item

Hi I had the same Issue,
What my problem solved was setting the baseline number for each serial and batch number on each specific line to the line number of that specific line.
like this:
doc.Lines.SerialNumbers.SetCurrentLine(doc.Lines.SerialNumbers.Count - 1);
doc.Lines.SerialNumbers.InternalSerialNumber = 2;
doc.Lines.SerialNumbers.BaseLineNumber = doc.Lines.SerialNumbers.Count - 1;
Regards

Error in posting a goods issue

Hi everyone,
We're encountering an issue with posting. When trying to post a goods issue from a delivery via VL02N, an error message is displayed : "The document does not contain any item.". although it does contain items.
Do you have an idea of why thie error would appear ?
Thanks in advance.

Hello,
Can you check whether
1. you have picked the item,if not then pick the material and goto Edit>Confirm pick order>All items, or
2. activated warehouse management. if yes then you need to create a transfer order with reference to that delivery.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Priyanka

Posting a "goods issue" msg NR751

Hi All,
posting a goods issue, sap gives me the message NR751...
But the number range has been created ...
I can't post the goods issue
Could anyone help me?
thanks
Gandalf

Ciao Gandalf, ( e' sempre un piacere incontrare un fan del signore degli anelli)
the error NR751 have 3 variables
-> For object &1 &2, number range interval &3 does not exist
Please, go to transaction SNRO and enter RF_BELEG (I suppose this is the object in the error) in the 'Object' field.
In the menu path press Go To -> Number Ranges.
Enter the relevant Company Code. Do you have an entry here for the interval &3?
Mauro

Issue while posting using goods issue for delivery type NL

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for