Issue with Capacity Levelling-CM25
Hi Everyone,
We use CM25 for capacity levelling.
Issue:
Total Capacity req. = 186.8 Hr
Available Capacity on 01.01.2012 on the resource = 380.2 Hr
Now when I try to dispatch the capacity req. for a planned order manually on 01.01.2012, system distributes the capacity-
Distributed Period
5.0 31.12.2011
23.8 01.01.2012
23.8 02.01.2012
23.8 03.01.2012
23.8 04.01.2012
23.8 05.01.2012
23.8 06.01.2012
23.8 07.01.2012
15.6 08.01.2012
186.8
But we want to dispatch capacity say on one particular day or split it onto two different days i.e. 90 Hrs on 01.01.2012 & 90 Hrs on 02.01.2012. Is it possible? If yes, how?
Additional Information-
Capacity Defination in resource-
No. of indiv. cap. 16
Operating time 23.76
Capacity 380.16
Relevant to finite scheduling
Thanks,
Parashar.
Hi Amol,
Thanks for your input.
As I have said I already have Capacity more than what is required.
Capacity Available per day: 380.2 Hr
Total Capacity Requirement: 186.8 Hr
I am trying to know that whether what issue has been raised is possible to solve in Capacity Levelling & How.
We are not maintaining shifts in SAP at present.
Thanks,
Parashar.
Similar Messages
-
Capacity Leveling(CM25 Transaction)
Xperts,
could you please give us some documentation/online material on Capacity Leveling(CM25 Transaction)?
Rewards for your inputs.hi
To Know about Capacity levelling, u can use this thread
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/PPCRPLVL/PPCRP_LVL.pdf
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/8a/a58eb24adc11d189740000e8322d00/frameset.htm
regards
Palaniappan -
URGENT HELP PLS : Issue with Multi Level Master Detail block
This is an issue someone else had posted in this forum few years back but there was no solution mentioned, I have run into this same issue , The problem is as explained below.
Any help on this is appreciated.
Scenario:
There are 3 Blocks in the form : A (Master Block)
: B (Detail of A )
: C (Detail of B )
There is master detail relation created between A and B and B and C. So initially when we query for a record in Master A, it shows all records properly in B and C.
Now if i navigate to the first record of B , and then second record of B , records corresponding to that record shows up properly in C block.
Till now everything works fine.
Issue 1:
But in case after querying initially on Master Block A,If I go directly to the second record of B block, it clears the whole B block and C block.
Issue 2:
Same thing happens if I am on C block ( corresponding to second record of B block) and then navigate to first record in B block , it again clears the whole B block and C block.
Please Help !!
Thanks !Thanks Xem for Your reply , I tried those settings but it did not help..here is the original link that to the thread that talks about the same problem ,
Issue with Multi Level Master Detail block
The last update to this was the following :
"I figured out that this is happening because Block Status is set to 'Changed' and this is causing it to clear out the blocks.
But cant figure out why the status is setting to 'Changed' "
Any Help from the form Gurus on this form in this matter is truely appreicated !!
Thanks,
Zid. -
Work schedule display in capacity leveling cm25
Hello,
In our company we have created a work schedule (tcode OP4A) and have associated to a work center (tcode IR02).
However, capacity leveling (tcode CM25) doesn't display the work schedule associated to our workers in the graphical planning table.
Do you have any idea how to solve this problem?
Thank you very much,
ÓscarIt could be issue with your over all profile..
Use - Over all profile SAPPM_G001
Overall prof: SAPPM_G001 PM: Ind.cap/tab/day/avail.lab./norm.schd
Select.profile: SAPPM_S001 PM: Tab/work center/lab/
Control profile: SAPPM_C004 PM: Capacity planning table individual
Time prof: SAPPM_Z0T1 PM: Tab. short-term (1 month)
Evaluation prof.: SAPPM_A001 PM: Plant maintenance
Strategy prof.: SAPPM_T002 Lead time sched. backwards
Capacity planning table (tab.form): SAPPM_R001 PM: Plant maintenance/Individual caps.
Note: Don't modify the Standard profile . -
List of issues with patch level
Is there a list of application errors reported for each patch level?
When working with SAP R/3, there is a SAP note released for each patch level which states the changes delivered in that patch as well as what fixes are delivered. Therefore, it is easy to see what application errors exist in each patch level. Is there something similar for SAP Business One?There are also notes for those Lists of issues with each patch level for B1. What is your B1 version and PL?
Thanks,
Gordon -
URGENT: Issue with hierarchy level keys and report drill down
Hi,
BASIC STRUCTURE:
I have created a subject area with 3 facts (FACT_A, FACT_B, FACT_C) and 4 dimesnions (TIME_DIM,DIM_2,DIM_3,DIM_4). Each fact table also has additional aggregate tables aggregated along levels of the time dimension. Also our timw dimension has aggregated dimension tables like TIME_DIM_WEEK, TIME_DIM_MONTH, TIME_DIM_QUARTER and TIME_DIm_YEAR.
GOAL:
All 3 facts have the same measures M_1 and M_2 in them but may not have data for the same dimension values selected.
For example
For month JAN 2000 FACT_A.M1=100$ and no data exists for JAN 2000 in FACT_B and FACT_C. Then in the report
for JAN2000 it should show FACT_A.M1= $100, FACT_B.M1 = 0 and FACT_C.M1 =0. In this case I should be able to drill down to the lowest level.
ISSUE:
The time dimension TIME_DIM has the following levels - Total -> Year -> Quarter -> Month -> Week -> Day
However I am having an issue with drill down in the reports whenever I pull metrics from more than 1 fact at a time. I have defined the level keys but not sure if I need to do anything in addition since I am using aggregates.
I have to fix this issue quickly. Please help me.Alastair,
All the fact tables have aggregated facts as sources.
I have checked the levels set for each of the sources to the time dimesnion table in BMM and they look okay. So the Time dim table in BMM has 4 source tables
Time_Day (level set to day, table key is "day"),
Time_month (level set to month, table key is "Fiscal_Month_Code"),
Time_Quarter(level set to quarter, table key is "Fiscal_Quarter_Code") and
Time_Year(level set to year, table key is :Fiscal_Year_Code").
Note: No time week aggregate added as logical source.
Again the time dim hierarchy based off of this table has levels: Total -> Year ->quarter -> Month -> week -> day
The levels keys set for each level are
Year -> Primary key is Year_Name (YYYY)(Checked as chronological key) and another key is Year_Num (YYYY)(Checked as chronological key)
Quarter->Primary Key is Quarter_Name (YYYY Qn), another key is Quarter_Number (Format n where n can assum values 1,2,3,4). Both keys are set as chronological keys
Month -> Primary key is Month_Name (MON YYYY), another key is Month_Num (Format n where n can assume values from 1 to 12) Both keys are set as chronological keys
Week -> Primary Key is week name (YYYY Wk nn, where nn can have values from 1 to 53), another key is week num (nn, where nn can have values from 1 to 53)
Day -> primary key set to day (date format)
Issue1: When I try to drill to lower levels it throws out an error saying report cannot find any data because filters may be too restrictive even though I see data at higher level
For ex: If I drill down to Year: 2010 and Qtr: 2010 Q2 and M1:$100 when I click on Qtr to drll to month level it throws me the error
Issue2: when I add year and qtr colums to the report I see data as below which is incorrect
Year_Name Qtr_Name data:FACTA_M1 Data: FactB_M1
2009 2009 Q1 $10 $5
2009 2009 Q2 $20 $80
2009 2009 Q3 $20
2009 2009 Q4 $30
2010 2010 Q1 $100
2010 Q2 $101
2010 Q3 $102 $230
2010 Q4 $103
2011 Q1 $10
In the above example year_name is not showing up for 2010 Q2 and after. However if I change the primary key for level 'Quarter' by having key consist of year name and quarter name instead of just quarter name the issue doesnt occur and drill down works great. The only issue is when I drill from qtr it first shows year name and quarter name instead of showing the next level which would be month name.
Sorry about the long message but I thought you might notice something in how I have set up the keys.
Thanks -
Infinite scheduling with capacity leveling.......
Hi there ,
If we go for infinite scheduling & then after MRP run go for capacity leveling ..........
then will we get the same effect as finite scheduling .....
Please suggest me
Regards
KaushikHi Kaushik,
If my understanding is correct, you are asking for the difference between manual and automatick despatching of orders in capacity levelling?
when we set finite scheduling in capacity header view of work center, and run MRP with scheduling parameter 2 set.
In capacity planning the availabile capacity will be compared with the required capacity and the load will be depicted as a graph or in table format. This only gives the load situation against the period.
For this the despatching of order will be done manually based upon the load per day by a scheduler in capacity levelling.
And to add more,
In R/3 finite scheduling is not there and this is drawback and APO was put in front for this purpose.
Can you confirm me whether the system automatically levels the order or despatchs the order in finite scheduling.
Best Regards,
Sendil -
Issue with muliti level custom Leave Workflow
Hi,
our Leave Workflow is multi level Approvals based on Absence codes.
Say for Example : Case 1: For casual leave 2 Level Approval,
Case 2: For Sick Leave 1 Level Approval,
Case 3: For Maternity leave 3 Level Approval.
The Workflow is working fine for Case 1 and Case 2. Workflow is Getting Completed. No issues at all here.
The Issue is with Maternity Leave there are 3 level of approvals Manager 1, Manager 2, Manager 3.
First 2 Managers are able to approve it from portal and for third level approval the work item is going to Manager 3's UWL.
But when we click on work item it is showing the message like your Work list is Empty.
Even we have forwarded the work item to Manager 2 and Manager 1 using SWIA. From their UWL also we are getting this same message
your Work list is Empty.
Observations:
Request status is in SENT status.
Visualization parameters are fine.
Agent is Ready.
In R3 Level we are not able to see the worklist details in Approval mode in PTARQ tcode for Manager 3,
For Manager 1 & Manager 2 it is fine there we had approved in PTARQ.
Here are the Screen shots.
What Could be the issues? Are we missing something?
Ideas and Suggestions are welcome
Regards,
ArunHi Arun
Can you please give a screen shot of the technical workflow log with the step history selected for this step? (ensure that you have tried executing it once from UWL and rcd the same message), then get to the backend WF log).
Also, is the same Workflow task sent to all three levels in a loop or is it a different task at level 3?
Is there any deadline monitoring assigned to the task (for third level)?
Regards,
Modak -
PO Form Issue with Header Level Changes
Issue:
It has been observed that whenever changes are done in PO Header (e.g. Header Text), system prints Billing Address and Communications Details as blank. If the changes are made to Line Item level along with header then system prints the Billing address and Communication Details correctly.
Analyse:
we are using the SELECT statement below to fetch the field for
Billing Address and Communications Details.
SELECT SINGLE
mandt z_plant z_company_code z_toll_free_no z_local_no z_fax_no
z_email z_name1 z_name2 z_street z_house_no z_district z_post_code
z_city z_country z_vat_no z_loc_term_cond z_langu
FROM zptp_poformdata
INTO w_poformdata
WHERE z_plant = ls_ekpo-werks
AND z_company_code = ls_ekpo-bukrs .
And when we only change the header level data no value is passing for comany code and plant . as a result Select statement gets failed and we are getting blank window.
NOTE: we are getting blank box only when we fire a print or fax.The preview is coming fine.by asking so many questions in a single post,you are violating the rule of engagement given below
Only One Question Per Posting
For each question that you have, make a separate posting. Don't ask multiple questions in one posting, this is confusing for people and might not get answered, since the subject line does not reflect all your problems. If a new and unrelated question comes up during a thread, start a new thread. -
Query Issue with select level from dual
Hi,
I have a question regarding this query. The problem seems that when selecting level from dual while including another table the rows returned seem to increase exponentially.
I can add distinct and get the correct number of rows but am worried that this will cause a possible performance issue. Am I using the level option wrong?
I have included details below.
There are 4 rows in tbl_incidents
When I run the following queries I get rows returned based on the total number of rows
select start_date + level - 1, tbl_incidents.incident_id, level
from dual, tbl_incidents
where incident_id = 6
connect by level <= 1;
returns 1 row
select start_date + level - 1, tbl_incidents.incident_id, level
from dual, tbl_incidents
where incident_id = 6
connect by level <= 2;
returns 5 rows
select start_date + level - 1, tbl_incidents.incident_id, level
from dual, tbl_incidents
connect by level <= 3 and incident_id = 6;
returns 21 rows
select start_date + level - 1, tbl_incidents.incident_id, level
from dual, tbl_incidents
connect by level <= 4 and incident_id = 6;
returns 85 rows
select start_date + level - 1, tbl_incidents.incident_id, level
from dual, tbl_incidents
connect by level <= 5 and incident_id = 6;
returns 341 rows
So with
r being the number of rows in tbl_incidents and
l being the number used in the connect by for level and
q being the number of rows returned by the query
it appears that
q(l) = r * q(l-1) + 1
level 2: 4 * 1 + 1 = 5
level 3: 4 * 5 + 1 = 21
level 4: 4 * 21 + 1 = 85
level 5: 4 * 85 + 1 = 341
Thanks much,
NoraHi,
The dual table is used when you want to do something in SQL when you are not otherwise using a table.
Generating a "counter table" of the integers 1, 2, 3,..., X is an example
SELECT LEVEL AS n
FROM dual
WHERE LEVEL <= x;There is never any point in joining dual to another table, as in
select start_date + level - 1
, tbl_incidents.incident_id
, level
from dual
, tbl_incidents
where incident_id = 6
connect by level <= x;You will always get the same more easily by just eliminating dual:
select start_date + level - 1
, incident_id
, level
from tbl_incidents
where incident_id = 6
connect by level <= x;It is quite useful and common to join a counter-table to a real table, like this cross-join:
WITH counter_table AS
SELECT LEVEL AS n
FROM dual
WHERE LEVEL <= x
select start_date + n - 1
, incident_id
, n
from tbl_incidents
, counter_table
where incident_id = 6 -
Issue with extra levels when merging projects
Hello all,
(note: working with RH5 and MS HTML help files)
I've created a new project that needs merging into our main
help system (which already consists of 20-something projects). The
issue I'm having is that RH5 seems to be adding several layers to
the TOC.
Originally, the new project had the following layout:
Project Book
-project overview page
-Application A book
-Application B book
-Application C book
-Application D book
When this was linked to our main project and then the main
project was compiled, the TOC looks like this:
Project Book
- Project Book
-- Project Book
--- Project Book
---- Overview page
---- Application A Book
---- Application B Book
---- Application C Book
---- Application D Book
To me, there are at least 2 unnecessary levels inserted into
this. I tried to alter this by removing the Project Book from the
Project chm, so it was just:
-project overview page
-Application A book
-Application B book
-Application C book
-Application D book
However, this did not remove any of the extraneous levels,
and in addition the Project overview page is now accessible only by
clicking on one of the middle Project books (i.e. it previously was
its own page that could be directly clicked on in the TOC, and now
it no longer shows there).
Any thoughts on how/why these extra levels are being
inserted? I'm fine with it an extra level, like
Project Book
- Project Book
-- Overview page
-- Application A, etc.
Having 2 or 3 extra levels, however, is a bit much,
especially since RH seems to be adding them itself.Hi, Tech Writer KC,
I don't know if this has been fixed in recent versions of
RoboHelp, but I believe there was a long-time bug in RoboHelp
— and in HTML Help Workshop, too — where the Include
statements for the secondary TOCs were written at the wrong level
in the master TOC. You can read a little more about this in the
"Known Bugs" section here:
http://helpware.net/htmlhelp/how_to_merge.htm
Many people worked around the problem by using FAR to edit
the master TOC.
http://helpware.net/FAR/index.html
Pete -
Issue with Skip Level Hierarchy in OBIEE 11g
Hi,
I have implemented Ragged and Skip Level Hierarchy as explained in the links below in OBIEE 11g RPD.
(checked the 'Ragged' and 'Skipped Levels' check boxes)
http://www.rittmanmead.com/2010/07/obiee-11gr1-support-for-ragged-skip-level-value-based-hierarchies/
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17904_01/bi.1111/e10540/dimensions.htm#BABFBBFG
When the Presentation Hierarchy is dragged in the OBI Answers, the leaf level beyond the skip (null) levels is not shown in the report.
When any level finds intermediate null values, OBIEE is failing to show the existing value of the leaf level (Most Granular Level) or any values after Skipped Levels.
For example, following is the values in database for different levels of department hierarchy.
A -> B -> C -> Null -> Null -> F
The OBIEE Presentation Hierarchy can only drill down till C, not beyond that. (does not show the leaf level value 'F').
Could you please suggest whether I am missing any step?
Thanks.Hi, My problem is that in my report it is showing me that levels as -- A -> B -> C -> Null -> Null -> F, however I want to show data as A -> B -> C -> F, i.e the null valus(columns) should be skipped. Please help.
Thanks and Regards,
Deepak -
Issue with multiple level master details
Hi All,
I just came around with following scenario and found it is not working as expected.
GFVO ( Primary Key Attribute -> GFID )
| ---- ViewLink between GFVO and ParentVO on attribute GFID
Parent VO (PrimaryKey PID )
| -- ViewLink between Parent VO and Child VO on attribute ATTR1
ChildVO (PrimaryKey CID )
Data ->
GF VO has record -
1 , xyz
2 , abc
Parent VO
PID Name PGFID ATTR1
1 ppp 1 1
2 ttt 1 2
3 lll 2 1
4 kkk 2 2
Child VO
CID Name ATTR1
1 cc1 1
2 cc2 1
3 cc3 2
4 cc4 2
Requirement is I want to show the name attribute of Parent in Child VO. I have used parent accessor exposed in child to display the name of the parent. When I use this multiple hierarchy in AM and run it I find the wierd result.
Say I select Row (2 , abc) in GF VO.
I should see below two rows in Parent Row.
PID Name PGFID ATTR1
3 lll 2 1
4 kkk 2 2
Now I select Row ( 3 lll 2 1 ) in Parent VO , it shows the following Child ROw I get this result -
CID Name ATTR1 ParentName( accessed throug ViewAccessor)
1 cc1 1 ppp
2 cc2 1 ppp
Gotcha ..... Parent Name ? I am assuming that when we try to access the parent through accessor it will give the parent row from the already filtered VO based on first Viewlink. Rather it requires and gives the first parent as if I m having a single join.
Thanks,
RajdeepHi,
for a master-detail between tables you create a tree binding each. Assuming the data model you defined contains the three view objects in a hierarchy, you simple drag the parent, then the first child and then the second child as a table to teh view. You then configure the PartialTriggers property of child2 table to point to child1 and parent table. The child 1 table partial triggers property will point to the parent table. This should make the m/d work. If on the server you want to use accessors in the code to get to the details of a child (on the client I would use the iterator binding in the PageDef file), make sure you access the correct instance of the ViewOject
Frank -
Capacity leveling, after Deallocate scheduling dates getting changed.
Dear Experts,
I have a issue in Capacity leveling using transaction CM25 - Online. I have created some production orders (using forwards/backwards scheduling) for overloading of WorkCentre's. When I dispatch orders it’s getting scheduled perfectly, but when I Deallocate same orders scheduled dates are getting changed.
Even after deallocation production orders schedule dates should be the same. Can you please help me in this regard?
Thanks in advance.
PrashanthHello Prashanth,
From SAP help Date Determination in Dispatching and Rescheduling - Capacity Leveling (PP-CRP-LVL) - SAP Library
The current dispatching data is cancelled. The status "dispatched" of the operation is reversed. The order is rescheduled.
If further operations exist for an order which has already been dispatched, the system automatically carries out midpoint scheduling. If no other dispatched operations exist, the system carries out lead time scheduling.
If order date is in past then it schedules to current date during de allocation if you do not have enter number of past days allowed to start date in scheduling parameters.
Br
KK -
Resource scope when performing capacity leveling with Optimization method
Hello,
Can anyone tell me if, when performing the Optimization method in Capacity Leveling for transportation resources production resources are validated? I am currently testing this and I found out that if the capacity variant of the production resource is no 00, 01 or 02 the system will give an error message when trying to level a transportation resource, the message indicates that there is no available capacity for the production resource.
When reading documentation in help.sap it appears to me that Capacity Leveling should only focus on the resource to be level not in other resources and in this case my transportation resource has available capacity that shouldn't be affected for master data errors of production resources...
Could somebody help me clarify this issue?, I have already open a message and they suggested me to change the capacity variant of the production resource, evidently when I do this everything works but I still don't understand why capacity leveling, with Optimization method, of a transportation resources is checking on production resources.
Thanks!
ErikaHello Ian,
I am not talking about the SNP Optimization Run that is certainly manipulated by the constraints that you update on the optimization profile; in this case "Capacity Leveling with Optimization Method" the constraints are automatically set by the system and what I need to know is if these constraints are considering not only the resource that is to be leveled (in this case the transportation resource) but also the production resource.
Sorry but your answer does not correspond to my request, because you are talking about the Planning Optimization run and I am talking about "Capacity Leveling with Optimization Method".
Erika
Maybe you are looking for
-
Alertmonitoring in SAP XI and the standard text follow up activities
Hello together, we implement the XI Alertmonitoring. This works propertly. Only I we don't need the section "follow up activites". So it is possible to delete the entry ? Here the error message as-is: Alert ID: ##80586## XI System ID: P80 Alert creat
-
Connect 6800 printer to new router
I have searched all the HP pages and this forum and haven't found an answer that works. I have a Deskjet 6840 printer and just had to buy a new router (linksys N750) and cannot connect the printer via wireless. With this model I cannot use the setup
-
Inconsistent update flags Message no. C(004
Hi Friends, When I processed the order in CRM Online it got replicated to R/3 and from R/3 Delivery and invoice got created and document is completed. The Issue is that the Bdoc which has to replciate the Delivery and Invoice back to C
-
Looking for tc settings to connect activ8me fibre
Has anyone successfully connected a 3rd gen time capsule to activ8me NBN Fibre? I can't get it connect no matter what I try?
-
Developing Xlets using Java 1.5
Hi Folks, Does anybody knows that is it possible to develop Xlets using Java 1.5. I tried to write some using NetBeans 5.0, and jdk 1.4. ? Cheers,