Issue with one Select Query in PBS Archive Translation Tool

Hi All,
Iam having X mark symbol against the select query from EKET table
This is the select query in my actual program and when i convert this using PBS Archive Translation Tool i have a X mark against this select query
SELECT SINGLE BANFN FROM EKET INTO V_BANFN WHERE EBELN = BSEG-EBELN AND
EBELP = BSEG-EBELP AND
ETENR = '0001'.
I guess i have to modify this select query because EKET table has transaction data and we cannot ignore this X mark.
Let me know if iam wrong
ALso , iam confused whether a select query with X needs to fixed or can be ignored
Thanks

Hi ,
Any Suggestions
Thanks

Similar Messages

Performance issue with the Select query

Hi,
I have an issue with the performance with a seclet query.
In table AFRU - AUFNR is not a key field.
So i had selected the low and high values into s_reuck and used it in Where condition.
Still i have an issue with the Performance.
SELECT SINGLE RUECK
RMZHL
IEDD
AUFNR
STOKZ
STZHL
FROM AFRU INTO table t_AFRU
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN T_ZSCPRT100
WHERE RUECK IN S_RUECK AND
AUFNR = T_ZSCPRT100-AUFNR AND
STOKZ = SPACE AND
STZHL = 0.
I had also cheked by createing an index for AUFNR in the table AFRU...it does not help.
Is there anyway that we can declare Key field while declaring the Internal table....?
ANy suggestions to fix the performance issue is apprecaited!
Regards,
Kittu

Hi,
Thank you for your quick response!
Rui dantas, i have lill confusion...this is my code below :
data : t_zscprt type standard table of ty_zscprt,
       wa_zscprt type ty_zscprt.
types : BEGIN OF ty_zscprt100,
        aufnr type zscprt100-aufnr,
        posnr type zscprt100-posnr,
        ezclose type zscprt100-ezclose,
        serialnr type zscprt100-serialnr,
        lgort type zscprt100-lgort,
      END OF ty_zscprt100.
data : t_zscprt100 type standard table of ty_zscprt100,
       wa_zscprt100 type ty_zscprt100.
Types: begin of ty_afru,
            rueck type CO_RUECK,
            rmzhl type CO_RMZHL,
            iedd type RU_IEDD,
            aufnr type AUFNR,
            stokz type CO_STOKZ,
            stzhl type CO_STZHL,
         end of ty_afru.
data : t_afru type STANDARD TABLE OF ty_afru,
        WA_AFRU TYPE TY_AFRU.
SELECT AUFNR
        POSNR
        EZCLOSE
        SERIALNR
        LGORT
        FROM ZSCPRT100 INTO TABLE T_ZSCPRT100
        FOR ALL ENTRIES IN T_ZSCPRT
        WHERE   AUFNR = T_ZSCPRT-PRTNUM
        AND   SERIALNR IN S_SERIAL
        AND    LGORT   IN S_LGORT.
    IF sy-subrc <> 0.
       MESSAGE ID 'Z2' TYPE 'I' NUMBER '41'. "BDCG87
       stop."BDCG87
    ENDIF.
ENDIF.
SELECT    RUECK
              RMZHL
              IEDD
              AUFNR
              STOKZ
              STZHL
              FROM AFRU INTO TABLE T_AFRU
              FOR ALL ENTRIES IN T_ZSCPRT100
              WHERE RUECK IN S_RUECK     AND
                    AUFNR = T_ZSCPRT100-AUFNR AND
                    STOKZ = SPACE AND
                    STZHL = 0.
Using AUFNR, get AUFPL from AFKO
Using AUFPL, get RUECK from AFVC
Using RUEKC, read AFRU
In other words, one select joining AFKO <-> AFVC <-> AFRU should get what you want.
This is my select query, would you want me to write another select query to meet this criteria..
From AUFNR> I will get AUFPL from AFKO> BAsed on AUFPL I will get RUECK, based on RUEKC i need to read AFRU..but i need to select few field from AFRu based on AUFNR....
ANy suggestions wil be appreciated!
Regards
Kittu

Issue with the select query

Hi,
DATA: BEGIN OF IT_MATERIAL OCCURS 0,
      IDNRK LIKE STPO-IDNRK,
      MATNR LIKE MAST-MATNR,
      END OF IT_MATERIAL.
FORM CHECK_SALESDATA_EXISTENCE .
IF NOT IT_MATERIAL[] IS INITIAL.
    LOOP AT IT_MATERIAL.
      CLEAR VBAP.
      SELECT SINGLE * FROM VBAP WHERE MATNR EQ IT_MATERIAL-MATNR.
      IF SY-SUBRC NE 0.
        DELETE IT_MATERIAL WHERE IDNRK EQ IT_MATERIAL-IDNRK
                             AND MATNR EQ IT_MATERIAL-MATNR.
      ENDIF.
      CLEAR IT_MATERIAL.
    ENDLOOP.
ENDIF.
ENDFORM.                    " CHECK_SALESDATA_EXISTENCE
The above is the subroutine in the program which check whether sales data exists for a material or not. But the problem is the select statement which is written in the loop is taking so much of time because of this the program is going into short dump "Time Exceed Limit".
Please suggest how can i modifiy the above statemnt so that the performance of the program increases.
<REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
Thanks.
Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Mar 4, 2008 10:37 AM

The program deletes multiple records inside a loop. This isn't good practice. The following should work:
REPORT ztest LINE-SIZE 80 MESSAGE-ID 00.
TABLES: vapma.
DATA: BEGIN OF it_material OCCURS 0,
matnr LIKE mast-matnr,
idnrk LIKE stpo-idnrk,
END OF it_material.
PERFORM check_salesdata_existence.
*&      Form CHECK_SALESDATA_EXISTENCE
*       text
FORM check_salesdata_existence .
DATA: delete.
SORT it_material BY matnr.
LOOP AT it_material.
    AT NEW matnr.
      SELECT SINGLE * FROM vapma
        WHERE matnr EQ it_material-matnr.
      IF sy-subrc <> 0.
        delete = 'X'.
      ELSE.
        CLEAR delete.
      ENDIF.
    ENDAT.
    IF delete = 'X'.
      DELETE it_material.
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
ENDFORM. " CHECK_SALESDATA_EXISTENCE
Note that I have changed the filed order in it_material so that AT NEW will work correctly.
Rob

Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query

Hi All,
There is a Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query in a report painter.
This query is working fine when executed in 4.7 system where as it is running for more time in ECC6.0.
Select query is on the table COSP.
SELECT (FIELD_LIST)
        INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE I_COSP PACKAGE SIZE 1000
        FROM COSP CLIENT SPECIFIED
        WHERE GJAHR IN SELR_GJAHR
          AND KSTAR IN SELR_KSTAR
          AND LEDNR EQ '00'
          AND OBJNR IN SELR_OBJNR
          AND PERBL IN SELR_PERBL
          AND VERSN IN SELR_VERSN
          AND WRTTP IN SELR_WRTTP
          AND MANDT IN MANDTTAB
        GROUP BY (GROUP_LIST).
   LOOP AT I_COSP      .
     COSP                           = I_COSP      .
     PERFORM PCOSP       USING I_COSP-_COUNTER.
     CLEAR: $RWTAB, COSP                          .
     CLEAR CCR1S                         .
   ENDLOOP.
ENDSELECT.
I have checked with the table indexes, they were same as in 4.7 system.
What can be the reson for the difference in execution time. How can this be reduced without adjusting the select query.
Thanks in advance for the responses.
Regards,
Dedeepya.

Hi,
ohhhhh....... lots of problems in select query......this is not the way you should write it.
Some generic comments:
1. never use SELECT
                   endselect.
   SELECT
into table
   for all entries in table
where.
   use perform statment after this selection.
2. Do not use into corresponding fields. use exact structure type.
3. use proper sequence of fields in the where condition so that it helps table go according to indexes.
    e.g in your case
          sequence should be
LEDNR
OBJNR
GJAHR
WRTTP
VERSN
KSTAR
HRKFT
VRGNG
VBUND
PARGB
BEKNZ
TWAER
PERBL
sequence should be same as defined in table.
Always keep select query as simple as possible and perform all other calculations etc. afterwords.
I hope it helps.
Regards,
Pranaya

I am getting dump error while running one report in one select query

Hi,
While running a report program, I am getting a dump error in one select query. So could you please correct the select query so that I can't face the dump error.
SELECT vbeln parvw kunnr INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE l_t_vbpa
FROM vbpa
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN l_t_backorder_item
WHERE vbeln = l_t_backorder_item-vbeln AND
( ( parvw = c_we AND kunnr IN rng_shipto ) OR ( parvw = c_ag AND
kunnr IN rng_soldto ) ) .
<removed by moderator>
Best Regards,
BDP
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Apr 30, 2010 12:31 PM

Hi Bansidhar,
It would be helpful if you could tell what type of dump it is.
If it is a timeout you should check whether l_t_backorder_item is empty - in this case ALL document numbers are selected. f you get the timeout with a populated table consider converting the l_t_backorder_item table into one ore more ranges tables - the select with ranges tables is way quicker than 'for all entries'. But take care the ranges table has not to many entries - the SAP SQL converter puts this into one huge SQL statement and this might become too big to be handled by the database (depends on the actual underlying database).
I would also consider splitting the SELECT into two (2nd one with 'appending into table') to make the code easier to understand It also helps the database system determining a strategy for the select.
Regards,
Gerd Rother

Need some help with the Select query.

Need some help with the Select query.
I had created a Z table with the following fields :
ZADS :
MANDT
VKORG
ABGRU.
I had written a select query as below :
select single vkorg abgru from ZADS into it_rej.
IT_REJ is a Work area:
DATA : BEGIN OF IT_REJ,
        VKORG TYPE VBAK-VKORG,
        ABGRU TYPE VBAP-ABGRU,
       END OF IT_REJ.
This is causing performance issue. They are asking me to include the where condition for this select query.
What should be my select query here?
Please suggest....
Any suggestion will be apprecaiated!
Regards,
Developer

Hello Everybody!
Thank you for all your response!
I had changes this work area into Internal table and changed the select query. PLease let me know if this causes any performance issues?
I had created a Z table with the following fields :
ZADS :
MANDT
VKORG
ABGRU.
I had written a select query as below :
I had removed the select single and insted of using the Structure it_rej, I had changed it into Internal table
select vkorg abgru from ZADS into it_rej.
Earlier :
IT_REJ is a Work area:
DATA : BEGIN OF IT_REJ,
VKORG TYPE VBAK-VKORG,
ABGRU TYPE VBAP-ABGRU,
END OF IT_REJ.
Now :
DATA : BEGIN OF IT_REJ occurs 0,
VKORG TYPE VBAK-VKORG,
ABGRU TYPE VBAP-ABGRU,
END OF IT_REJ.
I guess this will fix the issue correct?
PLease suggest!
Regards,
Developer.

Joining two tables having no common fields using one select query

Hi Experts,
How to join two tables which are NOT having any field in common using only one select query?
Your help will be appreciated.
Thank you.

Identify a third table (or more tables) with common fields with your two tables, or change your question either removing JOIN or removing NO COMMON FIELDS, else you wont get many responses and will be left alone in outer space, as suggested by Thomas.
If you acturally require what you written, better execute two select and merge the two internal tables merging every record from first table with every record of second table, til no more memory is available.
Regards,
Raymond

What is the wrong with my select query

HI All,
TYPES: BEGIN OF t_equi,
         equnr          TYPE equi-equnr,
         aedat          TYPE equi-aedat,
         matnr          TYPE equi-matnr,
         sernr          TYPE equi-sernr,
         kunde          TYPE equi-kunde,
         zzreg_date     TYPE equi-zzreg_date,
         zzin_indic     TYPE equi-zzin_indic,
         zzinvoice_num TYPE equi-zzinvoice_num,
         zzinvoice_date TYPE equi-zzinvoice_date,
         kund1          TYPE equz-kund1,
      END OF t_equi,
DATA: it_equi        TYPE TABLE OF t_equi,
SELECT equnr
         aedat
         matnr
         sernr
         kunde          "Ship to
         zzreg_date
         zzin_indic
         zzinvoice_num
         zzinvoice_date
         kund1            "Sold to
         INTO TABLE it_equi
         FROM equi AS a
         INNER JOIN equz AS b
         ON a~equnr = b~equnr
         WHERE a~equnr      IN s_equnr AND
*               aedat GE gv_rdate AND
               a~matnr      IN s_matnr AND
               a~sernr      IN s_sernr AND
               a~kunde      IN r_shpbr_kunde AND
               a~zzin_indic IN s_indic AND
               b~datbi      EQ c_datbi AND
               b~kund1     IN r_sldbr_kund1 .
what is the wrong with this select query.. ?
its giving me error "The column name "EQUNR" is unclear ."
Thanks

Hi ,
write tablename or alias in select also
SELECT a~equnr and check.
Regards

My 2007 Macbook pro Intel Core 2 Duo   Processor Speed 2.33 GHz has power issues with one or some of my USB powered devices. Last night I could not back up my Lacie external drives with software SuperDuper, hard drive copier. I also had a message that Tim

My 2007 Macbook pro Intel Core 2 Duo   Processor Speed 2.33 GHz has power issues with one or some of my USB powered devices. Last night I could not back up my Lacie external drives with software SuperDuper, hard drive copier. I also had a message that Time machine failed. I have two powered 12V USB
routers that are plugged into a 550VA CyberPower surge protector. I often receive these insufficient USB power for devices messages a dozen times even when I do not have devices like camera, Ipad, Ipod, and Tascam digital audio recorder plugged in. Is there a way to troubleshoot these USB routers or should I consider that one of the routers may be defective and replace them?
David

My 2007 Macbook pro Intel Core 2 Duo   Processor Speed 2.33 GHz has power issues with one or some of my USB powered devices. Last night I could not back up my Lacie external drives with software SuperDuper, hard drive copier. I also had a message that Time machine failed. I have two powered 12V USB
routers that are plugged into a 550VA CyberPower surge protector. I often receive these insufficient USB power for devices messages a dozen times even when I do not have devices like camera, Ipad, Ipod, and Tascam digital audio recorder plugged in. Is there a way to troubleshoot these USB routers or should I consider that one of the routers may be defective and replace them?
David

I have an older version of Firefox 3.6.6 I believe I am having an issue with one of the websites I sign into. Is there any way to update to the newest version

I have an older version of Firefox 3.6.6 I believe I am having an issue with one of the websites I sign into. Is there any way to update to the newest version. Without losing all my bookmarks and saved pass words?

Hello johngervais, the latest firefox version is 26.0 (today 4 Jan 2014).
note that [https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-no-longer-works-some-versions-windows-xp Firefox no longer works with some versions of Windows XP], if you have '''xp with sp2 and above''' you can update to latest version, see : [http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/26.0/system-requirements/ Firefox 26 System Requirements]
if you are able to update to latest version then see : [https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/common-questions-after-upgrading-firefox-36 Common questions after upgrading from Firefox 3.6]
see also : [https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-just-updated-why-it-asking-me-update-again Firefox just updated - why is it asking me to update again?]
Don't worry you won't losing bookmarks and passwords after update firefox.
thank you

I need to get the logs of my iPhone 5. I'm a registered as a developer and I have an issue with one of my app which is already in the market

I need to get the logs of my iPhone 5. I'm a registered as a developer and I have an issue with one of my app which is already in the market

The Firefox 3.5.x branch has reached end-of-life and is no longer maintained.<br />
You will no longer receive security updates.<br />
You can update Firefox via "Help > Check for Updates" or download and install the latest Firefox 3.6.x.<br />
Firefox 4 and later require at least OS X 10.5 and an Intel Mac.
* http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/4.0/system-requirements/
If you have problems with updating or with the permissions then easiest is to download the full version and trash the currently installed version to do a clean install of the new version.
Download a new copy of the Firefox program and save the DMG file to the desktop
* Firefox 3.6.x: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html
* Trash the current Firefox application to do a clean (re-)install
* Install the new version that you have downloaded
Your profile data is stored elsewhere in the [http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox Firefox Profile Folder], so you won't lose your bookmarks and other personal data.

How to show two seperate pivot tables with one select column

Hi All
My client wishes to have two pivot tables, one showing positive results and the other showing negative results.
For Example:
DIMENSION
BUSINESS A          1000
BUSINESS B          500
BUSINESS C          100
DIMENSION
BUSINESS A          -1000
BUSINESS B          -500
BUSINESS C          -100
Is it possible to then select the different DIMENSION with one select column for both?
Thanks

Not sure I got it right try this
for Number column pull twice and set col*-1
use 2 pivot table for each number type
cool as ~ http://cool-bi.com

Dns issues with one domain (Resolved)

i'm currently having dns issues with one domain, in that it won't resolve when I use bt's dns servers.
The domain is owned by a friend in the US who runs his own server for irc, web, and I also have a server that is on his connection, and resolves fine from other machines on different networks, and also resolves fine when I set windows to use the opendns servers, but when it's set to either my routers ip (using bt's dns), or set to automatic (using bt's dns via the homehub), this one domain will not resolve.
I'm pretty certain it's not a windows issue, as it's a clean install of windows 7 that I did yesterday. I've tried rebooting the homehub, and also flushing my dns on windows, but this has not solved the issue.
As I say, it resolves fine on other networks, and also when I use the opendns servers, so I know it's definately a dns issue.
Using bt's dns servers:
C:\Users\admin>ping chatnsn.com
Ping request could not find host chatnsn.com. Please check the name and try agai
n.
Using opendns:
C:\Users\admin>ping chatnsn.com
Pinging chatnsn.com [68.51.24.74] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Ping statistics for 68.51.24.74:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),
(The timeouts are normal...he has his router set to not respond to ping requests).
Has anyone got any ideas on how to sort this out? Preferably without having to phone the helpdesk...lets just say i've done it in the past, and according to the poeple I spoke to in india, I knew nothing about my own systems, and it was a problem at my end...which was not the case, and I proved this several times.
Edit: This issue appears to have resolved itself, and the domain is now resolving again using the homehub for dns resolution.

Hi,
When NSLOOKUP starts, before anything else, it checks the computer's network configuration to determine the IP address of the DNS server that the computer uses.
Then it does a reverse DNS lookup on that IP address to determine the name of the DNS server.
If reverse DNS for that IP address is not setup correctly, then NSLOOKUP cannot determine the name associated with the IP address.
http://support.simpledns.com/kb/a90/nslookup-cant-find-server-name___-default-server-unknown.aspx
Also refer to:
How to fix NSLOOKUP Default Server: UnKnown?
http://www.randika.info/2013/01/how-to-fix-nslookup-default-server.html
Regards.
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Internal table with same variable and one select query

Hi,
I am a new bee here with may be a silly question.
I have a internal table as below.
DATA: BEGIN OF IT_ORDERDETAILS OCCURS 0,
        VBELN LIKE VBAK-VBELN,        "Order number
        BSTNK LIKE VBAK-BSTNK,        "customer PO
        ERDAT LIKE VBAK-ERDAT,        " Order created date
        MATNR LIKE VBAP-MATNR,        "Sales order line item
        KWMENG LIKE VBAP-KWMENG,      "Quantity
        D_VBELN like likp-vbeln,      " delivery no
        POSNR like lips-posnr,        " delivery item
        KUNNR LIKE LIKP-KUNNR,        "ship quantity
END OF IT_ORDERDETAILS.
Where VBELN field is in VBAK and LIKP table.
VBELN in VBAK table = order #
VBELN in LIKP table is = Delivery #
I want to use join to fetch data in single select query.
Below is the select query
SELECT VBAK~VBELN
        VBAK~BSTNK
        VBAK~ERDAT
        VBAP~MATNR
        VBAP~KWMENG
        likp~vbeln
        lips~posnr
        LIPS~VGBEL
      INTO (IT_ORDERDETAILSvbak, IT_ORDERDETAILSbstnk,     IT_ORDERDETAILSerdat, IT_ORDERDETAILSmatnr, IT_ORDERDETAILSkwmeng, IT_ORDERDETAILSd_vbeln,IT_ORDERDETAILSposnr, IT_ORDERDETAILSkunnr)
FROM VBAK left outer JOIN VBAP ON ( VBAKVBELN = VBAPVBELN )
left outer JOIN LIPS ON ( VBAKVBELN = LIPSVGBEL )
join LIKP on ( LIPSVBELN = LIKPVBELN )
WHERE VBAK~ERDAT IN CR_DATE.
I am getting error in the query.
Please suggest.
Thanks,
Rajesh

Hi rajesh.nayakbola,
although this is not quite the right place for this, let me give you some notes:
1. Code should be
formatted as code
by markin it with mouse and use above <> button.
2. Internal tables shoult not be declared using OCCURS clause - this is last century style
3. Internal tables do not need and should not have a header line, they should use TYPES for declaration
4. Data should not be declared using LIKE: If they refer to dictionary TYPES, use TYPE. LIKE is only mandatory for data objects declared in your program, i.e. DATA IT_some_ORDERDETAILS like IT_ORDERDETAILS.
5. If you get an error here, never write "I am getting error" but copy and paste the error message fully.
- The fields in brackets in the INTO clause never have ~ character, there is no IT_ORDERDETAILS~vbak, only IT_ORDERDETAILS-vbeln
It could be something like this:
TYPES:
BEGIN OF TY_ORDERDETAILS,
VBELN TYPE VBAK-VBELN, "Order number
BSTNK TYPE VBAK-BSTNK, "customer PO
ERDAT TYPE VBAK-ERDAT, " Order created date
MATNR TYPE VBAP-MATNR, "Sales order line item
KWMENG TYPE VBAP-KWMENG, "Quantity
D_VBELN TYPE likp-vbeln, " delivery no
POSNR TYPE lips-posnr, " delivery item
KUNNR TYPE LIKP-KUNNR, "ship quantity
END OF TY_ORDERDETAILS.
DATA:
IT_ORDERDETAILS TYPE TABLE OF TY_ORDERDETAILS.
SELECT VBAK~VBELN
VBAK~BSTNK
VBAK~ERDAT
VBAP~MATNR
VBAP~KWMENG
likp~vbeln AS D_VBELN
lips~posnr
LIKP~KUNNR
INTO CORRSPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE IT_ORDERDETAILS
FROM VBAK left outer JOIN VBAP ON ( VBAK~VBELN = VBAP~VBELN )
left outer JOIN LIPS ON ( VBAK~VBELN = LIPS~VGBEL )
join LIKP on ( LIPS~VBELN = LIKP~VBELN )
WHERE VBAK~ERDAT IN CR_DATE.
Regards,
Clemens

How to improve the performance of one program in one select query

Hi,
I am facing performance issue in one program. I have given some part of the code of the program.
it is taking much time below select query. How to improve the performance.
Quick response is highly appreciated.
Program code
DATA: BEGIN OF t_dels_tvpod OCCURS 100,
vbeln LIKE tvpod-vbeln,
posnr LIKE tvpod-posnr,
lfimg_diff LIKE tvpod-lfimg_diff,
calcu LIKE tvpod-calcu,
podmg LIKE tvpod-podmg,
uecha LIKE lips-uecha,
pstyv LIKE lips-pstyv,
xchar LIKE lips-xchar,
grund LIKE tvpod-grund,
END OF t_dels_tvpod,
DATA: l_tabix LIKE sy-tabix,
lt_dels_tvpod LIKE t_dels_tvpod OCCURS 10 WITH HEADER LINE,
ls_dels_tvpod LIKE t_dels_tvpod.
SELECT vbeln INTO TABLE lt_dels_tvpod FROM likp
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_dels_tvpod
WHERE vbeln = t_dels_tvpod-vbeln
AND erdat IN s_erdat
AND bldat IN s_bldat
AND podat IN s_podat
AND ernam IN s_ernam
AND kunnr IN s_kunnr
AND vkorg IN s_vkorg
AND vstel IN s_vstel
AND lfart NOT IN r_del_types_exclude.
Waiting for quick response.
Best regards,
BDP

Bansidhar,
1) You need to add a check to make sure that internal table t_dels_tvpod (used in the FOR ALL ENTRIES clause) is not blank. If it is blank skip the SELECt statement.
2) Check the performance with and without clause 'AND lfart NOT IN r_del_types_exclude'. Sometimes NOT causes the select statement to not use the index. Instead of 'lfart NOT IN r_del_types_exclude' use 'lfart IN r_del_types_exclude' and build r_del_types_exclude by using r_del_types_exclude-sign = 'E' instead of 'I'.
3) Make sure that the table used in the FOR ALL ENTRIES clause has unique delivery numbers.
Try doing something like this.
TYPES: BEGIN OF ty_del_types_exclude,
         sign(1)   TYPE c,
         option(2) TYPE c,
         low       TYPE likp-lfart,
         high      TYPE likp-lfart,
       END OF ty_del_types_exclude.
DATA: w_del_types_exclude TYPE          ty_del_types_exclude,
      t_del_types_exclude TYPE TABLE OF ty_del_types_exclude,
      t_dels_tvpod_tmp    LIKE TABLE OF t_dels_tvpod        .
IF NOT t_dels_tvpod[] IS INITIAL.
* Assuming that I would like to exclude delivery types 'LP' and 'LPP'
CLEAR w_del_types_exclude.
REFRESH t_del_types_exclude.
w_del_types_exclude-sign = 'E'.
w_del_types_exclude-option = 'EQ'.
w_del_types_exclude-low = 'LP'.
APPEND w_del_types_exclude TO t_del_types_exclude.
w_del_types_exclude-low = 'LPP'.
APPEND w_del_types_exclude TO t_del_types_exclude.
t_dels_tvpod_tmp[] = t_dels_tvpod[].
SORT t_dels_tvpod_tmp BY vbeln.
DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM t_dels_tvpod_tmp
    COMPARING
      vbeln.
SELECT vbeln
    FROM likp
    INTO TABLE lt_dels_tvpod
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_dels_tvpod_tmp
    WHERE vbeln EQ t_dels_tvpod_tmp-vbeln
    AND erdat IN s_erdat
    AND bldat IN s_bldat
    AND podat IN s_podat
    AND ernam IN s_ernam
    AND kunnr IN s_kunnr
    AND vkorg IN s_vkorg
    AND vstel IN s_vstel
    AND lfart IN t_del_types_exclude.
ENDIF.

Issue with one Select Query in PBS Archive Translation Tool

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for