Issue with query performance

Hi,
I have a multi provider with 2 cubes & 3 ODS & 1 info object.
On top of this MP queries are built. All the queries are in 3.5
It takes more then 30 min to execute each query.
Now we are planning to replace all 3.5 queries in 7.
We will build cube on top of 3 ODS. New MP will have 3 cubes & 1 Info object.
My issue is, the other 2 cubes are too large. We have around 4 million records in each.
And i need only few fields from these cubes.
Is there any way I can have less load on MP?
What would be the best approach to improve query performance?
Thanks,
Gowri

Hello Gowri,
I think you should take the help of Aggregates.
You may create aggregates on the 2 large cube, using the characteristics
that you are using in the Query.
Since that cubes are having large amount of data, the use of aggregates will consideraly
reduce the Data manager time i.e. time spent by the query in retriving data from info-provider.
for more details on aggregates please refer the following link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/7d/eb683cc5e8ca68e10000000a114084/content.htm
Thanx and regards
Priyanka

Similar Messages

Performance issue with Query

11g
Hi there experts,
I have an issue with performance with a simple SQL which I thought cannot be tuned but just wanted to check with the experts here. We are running a query to get a persons ID based on his logged in email address from a Parties table which is huge (Millions of records). The query takes about 30 seconds to return a value. Was wondering is there a way to optimize this
The query is
{code}
select par.party_id
from parties party, users users
where
lower(party.email_address) = lower(:USER_EMAIL)
and party.system_reference = to_char(users.person_id)
and users.active_flag ='Yes';
{code}
The emails are stored in upper and lower, hence the lower functions
IS creating a function based index the only way?
Thanks,
Ryan

Hi Everyone.
Thanks and apologies, first post on tuning as such. Here is the explain plan generated through SQL DEVELOPER. IT showed the output in XML
By the way, looks like the {code} tag does not work?
{code}
SELECT STATEMENT
84903
     HASH JOIN
84903
     Access Predicates
     PARTY.ORIG_SYSTEM_REFERENCE=TO_CHAR(PERSON_ID)
     TABLE ACCESS
     PER_USERS
STORAGE FULL
1059
     Access Predicates
     AND
     ACTIVE_FLAG='Y'
     OR
     OR
     BUSINESS_GROUP_ID=0
     BUSINESS_GROUP_ID=1
     BUSINESS_GROUP_ID=DECODE(SYS_CONTEXT('FND_VPD_CTX','FND_ENTERPRISE_ID'),NULL,BUSINESS_GROUP_ID,TO_NUMBER(SYS_CONTEXT('FND_VPD_CTX','FND_ENTERPRISE_ID')))
     Filter Predicates
     AND
     ACTIVE_FLAG='Y'
     OR
     OR
     BUSINESS_GROUP_ID=0
     BUSINESS_GROUP_ID=1
     BUSINESS_GROUP_ID=DECODE(SYS_CONTEXT('FND_VPD_CTX','FND_ENTERPRISE_ID'),NULL,BUSINESS_GROUP_ID,TO_NUMBER(SYS_CONTEXT('FND_VPD_CTX','FND_ENTERPRISE_ID')))
     TABLE ACCESS
     HZ_PARTIES
STORAGE FULL
83843
     Access Predicates
     LOWER(PARTY.EMAIL_ADDRESS)='[email protected]'
     Filter Predicates
     LOWER(PARTY.EMAIL_ADDRESS)='[email protected]'
{code}
Purvesh, around 50% are 'Yes'
Thanks!

Performance issues with query input variable selection in ODS

Hi everyone
We've upgraded from BW 3.0B to NW04s BI using SP12.
There is a problem encountered with input variable selection. This happens regardless of using BEx (new or old 3.x) or using RSRT. When using the F4 search help (or "Select from list" in BEx context) to list possible values, this takes forever for large ODS (containing millions of records).
Using ST01 and SM50 to trace the code in the same query, we see a difference here:
<u>NW04s BI SQL command</u>
SELECT
"P0000"."COMP_CODE" AS "0000000032" ,"T0000"."TXTMD" AS "0000000032_TXTMD"
FROM
( "/BI0/PCOMP_CODE" "P0000" ) LEFT OUTER JOIN "/BI0/TCOMP_CODE" "T0000" ON "P0000"."COMP_CODE" = "T0000
"."COMP_CODE"
WHERE
"P0000"."OBJVERS" = 'A' AND "P0000"."COMP_CODE" IN ( SELECT "O"."COMP_CODE" AS "KEY" FROM
"/BI0/APY_PP_C100" "O" )
ORDER BY
"P0000"."COMP_CODE" ASC#
<u>BW 3.0B SQL command:</u>
SELECT ROWNUM < 500 ....
In 3.0B, rownum is limited to 500 and this results in a speedy, though limited query. In the new NW04s BI, this renders the selection screen unusable as ABAP dumps for timing out will occur first due to the large data volume searched using sequential read.
It will not be feasible to create indexes for every single query selection parameter (issues with oerformance when loading, space required etc.). Is there a reason why SAP seems have fallen back on a less effective code for this?
I have tried to change the number of selected rows to <500 in BEx settings but one must reach a responsive screen in order to get to that setting and it is not always possible or saved for the next run.
Anyone with similar experience or can provide help on this?

here is a reason why the F4 help on ODS was faster in BW 3.x.
In BW 3.x the ODS did not support the read mode "Only values in
InfoProvider". So If I compare the different SQL statements I propose
to change the F4 mode in the InfoProvider specific properties to
"About master data". This is the fastest F4 mode.
As an alternative you can define indexes on your ODS to speed up F4.
So would need a non-unique index on InfoObject 0COMP_CODE in your ODS
Check below for insights
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=6224682&messageID=2841493
Hope it Helps
Chetan
@CP..

Issue with sql performance

Hi, I am experiencing an issue with a couple of sql statements.   The rest of the db seems to be performing optimally.
A little history: Stats typically were never touched on this db and they were old (I mean very very old). However, the database performance was optimal. Recently we ran into an issue (turned out to be hardware), but in the troubleshooting, we deleted the old statistics and refreshed the stats across the board.
Prior to this incident, these queries would finish in mere minutes.
Performance for a few queries is sub optimal now.
When I execute this query it is performing ok returning a values in just over a minute.
select MAX(fr.fee_rqst_sid)
      from fee_rqst fr
      where fr.prcd_dt <= to_date('15/10/2013', 'DD/MM/RRRR');
Elapsed: 00:01:10.17
Plan hash value: 3146244357
| Id | Operation          | Name     | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |          |     1 |    23 |   404K (2)| 01:20:49 |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE    |          |     1 |    23 |            |          |
|* 2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| FEE_RQST |   148M| 3262M|   404K (2)| 01:20:49 |
When it is executed as part of the slightly larger query it belongs to performance drops to over 40 minutes.
    select MAX(ch.clm_hdr_sid)
    from clm_hdr ch
    where ch.fee_rqst_sid <= (
      select MAX(fr.fee_rqst_sid)
      from fee_rqst fr
      where fr.prcd_dt <= to_date('15/10/2013', 'DD/MM/RRRR'));
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 2801176651
| Id | Operation                    | Name       | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |            |     1 |    12 |   718K (1)| 02:23:41 |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE              |            |     1 |    12 |            |          |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| CLM_HDR    | 9410K|   107M|   718K (1)| 02:23:41 |
|* 3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IDX$_00002 | 1879K|       | 8533   (1)| 00:01:43 |
|   4 |     SORT AGGREGATE           |            |     1 |    23 |            |          |
|* 5 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL       | FEE_RQST   |   148M| 3262M|   404K (2)| 01:20:49 |
I've create/dropped an index on the date column figuring it might help but it did not as a full table scan still occurred.
The primary key indexes have up to date stats and are not corrupted indexes.
Again this is production and the rest of the db is running optimally and this db is used heavily.
I did run a sqltune but no new results yielded.
GENERAL INFORMATION SECTION
Tuning Task Name   : sql_tuning_task1
Tuning Task Owner : SYS
Workload Type      : Single SQL Statement
Scope              : COMPREHENSIVE
Time Limit(seconds): 60
Completion Status : COMPLETED
Started at         : 04/21/2015 16:23:18
Completed at       : 04/21/2015 16:24:15
Schema Name: SYS
SQL ID     : g52fuy8db7qgb
SQL Text   : select MAX(ch.clm_hdr_sid)
                 from npf.clm_hdr ch
                 where ch.fee_rqst_sid <= (
                   select MAX(fr.fee_rqst_sid)
                   from npf.fee_rqst fr
                   where fr.prcd_dt <= to_date('15/10/2013', 'DD/MM/RRRR'))
There are no recommendations to improve the statement.
Any advice on what else I can check?

Before asking this question, next time you would need to ask this forum to clean their crystal balls.
Your many many lines boil down to:
My car doesn't run, please fix my car, as there is insufficient INFORMATION to work on, and plenty of RIDDLES
1 Your database doesn't seem to have a four digit version
2 Your database doesn't seem to run on an OS
3 The statistics where 'refreshed across the board'. How that happened, this forum needs to guess.
4 Which indices are present on this table, this forum needs to guess
5 Which part of the table satisifies the where clause, this forum needs to guess.
So the obvious would be to answer all of these questions AND run the statement with event 10053 set, so the optimizer decisions are dumped to a trace file,
See https://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0%3A%3A%3A%3AP11_QUESTION_ID:63445044804318
And lastly, I find it more and more annoying, many people don't seem to a have a name, and post 100 percent anonymously.
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA

Issues with WebForm performance

Hi,
We had migrated a new application from UAT to PROD and we encounter webform performance issues with the following actions..
After login, the first form you open it is
always slow. After this you can switch from one form to another without a
delay.
Then once you change any data – the next time
you access a form it gets delayed.
The point to be noted is, it doesnt have any performance issues in the UAT environment and the configuration settings,essbase cache settings are all the same. We did try to move the EPM system to a new server to see if this is a hardware issue but no luck, the performance issues still exist. The consumption of the CPU/memory has been checked and it is proved that the form opening delay has nothing to do with lack of memory.
The JVM head settings is set up at 4GB which is infact higher than that of the UAT environment(2GB).
runs on Windows server2008,11.1.2.1.600 EPM serve, has planning,reporting,foundation on one server (32GB ram) and essbase on another server (32GB ram). Any help is appreciated.
Please find attached the planning logs below and there is nothing mentioned in the hyperionplanning error logs.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<Nov 5, 2013 8:05:43 PM CET> <Info> <Security> <BEA-090905> <Disabling CryptoJ JCE Provider self-integrity check for better startup performance. To enable this check, specify -Dweblogic.security.allowCryptoJDefaultJCEVerification=true>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:05:43 PM CET> <Info> <Security> <BEA-090906> <Changing the default Random Number Generator in RSA CryptoJ from ECDRBG to FIPS186PRNG. To disable this change, specify -Dweblogic.security.allowCryptoJDefaultPRNG=true>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:05:44 PM CET> <Info> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000377> <Starting WebLogic Server with Oracle JRockit(R) Version R28.0.2-11-135406-1.6.0_20-20100624-2119-windows-x86_64 from Oracle Corporation>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:05:46 PM CET> <Info> <Management> <BEA-141107> <Version: WebLogic Server 10.3.4.0 Fri Dec 17 20:47:33 PST 2010 1384255 >
<Nov 5, 2013 8:05:48 PM CET> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000365> <Server state changed to STARTING>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:05:48 PM CET> <Info> <WorkManager> <BEA-002900> <Initializing self-tuning thread pool>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:05:48 PM CET> <Notice> <Log Management> <BEA-170019> <The server log file C:\Oracle\Middleware\user_projects\domains\EPMSystem\servers\Planning0\logs\Planning0.log is opened. All server side log events will be written to this file.>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:06:22 PM CET> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090082> <Security initializing using security realm myrealm.>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:06:28 PM CET> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000365> <Server state changed to STANDBY>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:06:28 PM CET> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000365> <Server state changed to STARTING>
Calling getConnection()
return weblogic.management.jmx.mbeanserver.WLSMBeanServer@327b36fb
Calling getDomainConfiguration()
Calling getConnection()
return weblogic.management.jmx.mbeanserver.WLSMBeanServer@327b36fb
Calling getRuntimeService()
Calling getConnection()
return weblogic.management.jmx.mbeanserver.WLSMBeanServer@327b36fb
return com.bea:Name=RuntimeService,Type=weblogic.management.mbeanservers.runtime.RuntimeServiceMBean
return com.bea:Name=EPMSystem,Type=Domain
Calling getConnection()
return weblogic.management.jmx.mbeanserver.WLSMBeanServer@327b36fb
Domain location is 'C:\Oracle\Middleware\user_projects\domains\EPMSystem'
Calling getRuntimeService()
return com.bea:Name=RuntimeService,Type=weblogic.management.mbeanservers.runtime.RuntimeServiceMBean
Calling getConnection()
return weblogic.management.jmx.mbeanserver.WLSMBeanServer@327b36fb
Calling getConnection()
return weblogic.management.jmx.mbeanserver.WLSMBeanServer@327b36fb
Calling getConnection()
return weblogic.management.jmx.mbeanserver.WLSMBeanServer@327b36fb
Calling getConnection()
return weblogic.management.jmx.mbeanserver.WLSMBeanServer@327b36fb
Checking C:\Oracle\Middleware\user_projects\domains\EPMSystem\servers\Planning0\registry_update.xml file
EPM_ORACLE_HOME: C:\Oracle\Middleware\EPMSystem11R1
Template for PLANNING#11.1.2.0: C:\Oracle\Middleware\EPMSystem11R1\common\templates\applications\epm_planning_11.1.2.1.jar
Dependencies for C:\Oracle\Middleware\EPMSystem11R1\common\templates\applications\epm_planning_11.1.2.1.jar: []
BPMUI shared webapp not referenced from PLANNING#11.1.2.0
Application name: PLANNING#11.1.2.0
Application source: HyperionPlanning.ear
Server name: Planning0
Server port: 8300
Server SSL port: 8343
Application context: HyperionPlanning
Registry product type: PLANNING_PRODUCT
Registry physical web application type: PLANNING_WEBAPP
weblogic.Name property is 'Planning0', seems to be WebLogic mode
registry.isRegistryDatabaseCreated()true
Registry was initialized sucessfully
Executing pre custom update for PLANNING#11.1.2.0
EPM_ORACLE_INSTANCE: C:\Oracle\Middleware\user_projects\epmsystem1
Physical Web App found
Web app already linked to some application server: false
The registry was not modifyed because it already containse all sturctures
Web app is already linked to the logical web app
No needs to run custom updater for PLANNING#11.1.2.0
loggingUpdatePLANNING.block file exist or the system is running in the Fusion mode, skipping logging.xml configuration
Planning locale: en_US
<Nov 5, 2013 8:06:39 PM CET> <Notice> <Log Management> <BEA-170027> <The Server has established connection with the Domain level Diagnostic Service successfully.>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:06:39 PM CET> <Notice> <Cluster> <BEA-000197> <Listening for announcements from cluster using unicast cluster messaging>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:06:39 PM CET> <Notice> <Cluster> <BEA-000133> <Waiting to synchronize with other running members of Planning.>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:09 PM CET> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000365> <Server state changed to ADMIN>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:09 PM CET> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000365> <Server state changed to RESUMING>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:09 PM CET> <Notice> <Cluster> <BEA-000162> <Starting "async" replication service with remote cluster address "null">
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:10 PM CET> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090171> <Loading the identity certificate and private key stored under the alias DemoIdentity from the jks keystore file C:\Oracle\MIDDLE~1\WLSERV~1.3\server\lib\DemoIdentity.jks.>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:10 PM CET> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090169> <Loading trusted certificates from the jks keystore file C:\Oracle\MIDDLE~1\WLSERV~1.3\server\lib\DemoTrust.jks.>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:10 PM CET> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090169> <Loading trusted certificates from the jks keystore file C:\Oracle\Middleware\jrockit_160_20\jre\lib\security\cacerts.>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:10 PM CET> <Alert> <Security> <BEA-090152> <Demo trusted CA certificate is being used in production mode: [
Version: V3
Subject: CN=CACERT, OU=FOR TESTING ONLY, O=MyOrganization, L=MyTown, ST=MyState, C=US
Signature Algorithm: MD5withRSA, OID = 1.2.840.113549.1.1.4
Key: Sun RSA public key, 512 bits
modulus: 9550192877869244258838480703390456015046425375252278279190673063544122510925482179963329236052146047356415957587628011282484772458983977898996276815440753
public exponent: 65537
Validity: [From: Thu Mar 21 21:12:27 CET 2002,
               To: Tue Mar 22 21:12:27 CET 2022]
Issuer: CN=CACERT, OU=FOR TESTING ONLY, O=MyOrganization, L=MyTown, ST=MyState, C=US
SerialNumber: [    33f10648 fcde0deb 4199921f d64537f4]
Certificate Extensions: 1
[1]: ObjectId: 2.5.29.15 Criticality=true
KeyUsage [
Key_CertSign
Algorithm: [MD5withRSA]
Signature:
0000: 9D 26 4C 29 C8 91 C3 A7   06 C3 24 6F AE B4 F8 82 .&L)......$o....
0010: 80 4D AA CB 7C 79 46 84   81 C4 66 95 F4 1E D8 C4 .M...yF...f.....
0020: E9 B7 D9 7C E2 23 33 A4   B7 21 E0 AA 54 2B 4A FF .....#3..!..T+J.
0030: CB 21 20 88 81 21 DB AC   90 54 D8 7D 79 63 23 3C .! ..!...T..yc#<
] The system is vulnerable to security attacks, since it trusts certificates signed by the demo trusted CA.>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:10 PM CET> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "CN=thawte Primary Root CA - G3,OU=(c) 2008 thawte\, Inc. - For authorized use only,OU=Certification Services Division,O=thawte\, Inc.,C=US". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:10 PM CET> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "CN=T-TeleSec GlobalRoot Class 3,OU=T-Systems Trust Center,O=T-Systems Enterprise Services GmbH,C=DE". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:10 PM CET> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "CN=T-TeleSec GlobalRoot Class 2,OU=T-Systems Trust Center,O=T-Systems Enterprise Services GmbH,C=DE". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:10 PM CET> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "CN=GlobalSign,O=GlobalSign,OU=GlobalSign Root CA - R3". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:10 PM CET> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "OU=Security Communication RootCA2,O=SECOM Trust Systems CO.\,LTD.,C=JP". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:10 PM CET> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "CN=VeriSign Universal Root Certification Authority,OU=(c) 2008 VeriSign\, Inc. - For authorized use only,OU=VeriSign Trust Network,O=VeriSign\, Inc.,C=US". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:10 PM CET> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "CN=KEYNECTIS ROOT CA,OU=ROOT,O=KEYNECTIS,C=FR". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:10 PM CET> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090898> <Ignoring the trusted CA certificate "CN=GeoTrust Primary Certification Authority - G3,OU=(c) 2008 GeoTrust Inc. - For authorized use only,O=GeoTrust Inc.,C=US". The loading of the trusted certificate list raised a certificate parsing exception PKIX: Unsupported OID in the AlgorithmIdentifier object: 1.2.840.113549.1.1.11.>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:10 PM CET> <Notice> <Server> <BEA-002613> <Channel "DefaultSecure[3]" is now listening on 127.0.0.1:8343 for protocols iiops, t3s, CLUSTER-BROADCAST-SECURE, ldaps, https.>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:10 PM CET> <Notice> <Server> <BEA-002613> <Channel "DefaultSecure[1]" is now listening on fe80:0:0:0:0:5efe:a53:4816:8343 for protocols iiops, t3s, CLUSTER-BROADCAST-SECURE, ldaps, https.>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:10 PM CET> <Notice> <Server> <BEA-002613> <Channel "DefaultSecure[4]" is now listening on 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1:8343 for protocols iiops, t3s, CLUSTER-BROADCAST-SECURE, ldaps, https.>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:10 PM CET> <Notice> <Server> <BEA-002613> <Channel "Default" is now listening on 10.83.72.22:8300 for protocols iiop, t3, CLUSTER-BROADCAST, ldap, snmp, http.>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:10 PM CET> <Notice> <Server> <BEA-002613> <Channel "Default[3]" is now listening on 127.0.0.1:8300 for protocols iiop, t3, CLUSTER-BROADCAST, ldap, snmp, http.>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:10 PM CET> <Notice> <Server> <BEA-002613> <Channel "Default[4]" is now listening on 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1:8300 for protocols iiop, t3, CLUSTER-BROADCAST, ldap, snmp, http.>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:10 PM CET> <Notice> <Server> <BEA-002613> <Channel "Default[2]" is now listening on fe80:0:0:0:0:ffff:ffff:fffe:8300 for protocols iiop, t3, CLUSTER-BROADCAST, ldap, snmp, http.>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:10 PM CET> <Notice> <Server> <BEA-002613> <Channel "Default[1]" is now listening on fe80:0:0:0:0:5efe:a53:4816:8300 for protocols iiop, t3, CLUSTER-BROADCAST, ldap, snmp, http.>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:10 PM CET> <Notice> <Server> <BEA-002613> <Channel "DefaultSecure[2]" is now listening on fe80:0:0:0:0:ffff:ffff:fffe:8343 for protocols iiops, t3s, CLUSTER-BROADCAST-SECURE, ldaps, https.>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:10 PM CET> <Notice> <Server> <BEA-002613> <Channel "DefaultSecure" is now listening on 10.83.72.22:8343 for protocols iiops, t3s, CLUSTER-BROADCAST-SECURE, ldaps, https.>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:10 PM CET> <Warning> <Server> <BEA-002611> <Hostname "WIPLPRD01.svc.unicc.org", maps to multiple IP addresses: 10.83.72.22, 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:10 PM CET> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000330> <Started WebLogic Managed Server "Planning0" for domain "EPMSystem" running in Production Mode>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:12 PM CET> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000365> <Server state changed to RUNNING>
<Nov 5, 2013 8:07:12 PM CET> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000360> <Server started in RUNNING mode>
using java.library.path: C:\Oracle\Middleware\EPMSystem11R1/products/Planning/lib64;C:\Oracle\Middleware\EPMSystem11R1/bin;C:\Oracle\Middleware\EPMSystem11R1/common/EssbaseRTC-64/11.1.2.0/bin;C:\Oracle\MIDDLE~1\patch_wls1034\profiles\default\native;C:\Oracle\MIDDLE~1\WLSERV~1.3\server\native\win\x64;C:\Oracle\MIDDLE~1\WLSERV~1.3\server\bin;C:\Oracle\MIDDLE~1\modules\ORGAPA~1.1\bin;C:\Oracle\MIDDLE~1\JROCKI~1\jre\bin;C:\Oracle\MIDDLE~1\JROCKI~1\bin;C:\Oracle\MIDDLE~1\WLSERV~1.3\server\native\win\x64\oci920_8
EPM_ORACLE_HOME (C:\Oracle\Middleware\EPMSystem11R1) is set from JVM property "EPM_ORACLE_HOME".
using Java property for Hyperion Home C:\Oracle\Middleware\EPMSystem11R1
EPM_ORACLE_INSTANCE (C:\Oracle\Middleware\user_projects\epmsystem1) is set from JVM property[EPM_ORACLE_INSTANCE].
Reaquired task list lease: Tue Nov 05 20:11:49 CET 2013: 1383678709156
Seeking ESAPI.properties
Found in 'org.owasp.esapi.resources' directory: C:\Oracle\Middleware\EPMSystem11R1\products\Planning\config\esapi\ESAPI.properties
Loaded 'ESAPI.properties' properties file
Seeking validation.properties
Found in 'org.owasp.esapi.resources' directory: C:\Oracle\Middleware\EPMSystem11R1\products\Planning\config\esapi\validation.properties
Loaded 'validation.properties' properties file
Seeking antisamy-esapi.xml
Found in 'org.owasp.esapi.resources' directory: C:\Oracle\Middleware\EPMSystem11R1\products\Planning\config\esapi\antisamy-esapi.xml
EnterData_Inner Processing Time:424
2013-11-05 20:14:47,454 INFO Thread-51 calcmgr.launch - Date/Time Started: 2013/11/05:20:14:47.452 CET Server/Application/Database: localhost/1415_WP/AWP Business Rule Name: WPA_Count By Planning user: wipoadmin Values entered for run-time prompts: [Variable] Wrk_Scenario:"Work_Plan_2014"[Variable] Funds:"Regular"[Variable] Units:"0001"
- Date/Time Started: 2013/11/05:20:14:47.452 CET Server/Application/Database: localhost/1415_WP/AWP Business Rule Name: WPA_Count By Planning user: wipoadmin Values entered for run-time prompts: [Variable] Wrk_Scenario:"Work_Plan_2014"[Variable] Funds:"Regular"[Variable] Units:"0001"
2013-11-05 20:14:54,066 INFO Thread-51 calcmgr.launch - Date/Time Ended: 2013/11/05:20:14:54.066 CET Server/Application/Database: localhost/1415_WP/AWP Business Rule Name: WPA_Count By Planning user: wipoadmin.
- Date/Time Ended: 2013/11/05:20:14:54.066 CET Server/Application/Database: localhost/1415_WP/AWP Business Rule Name: WPA_Count By Planning user: wipoadmin.
EnterData_Inner Processing Time:64
EnterData_Inner Processing Time:15
EnterData_Inner Processing Time:359
EnterData_Inner Processing Time:2
EnterData_Inner Processing Time:53
EnterData_Inner Processing Time:4
EnterData_Inner Processing Time:7
EPM_ORACLE_INSTANCE (C:\Oracle\Middleware\user_projects\epmsystem1) is set from JVM property[EPM_ORACLE_INSTANCE].
EPM_ORACLE_INSTANCE (C:\Oracle\Middleware\user_projects\epmsystem1) is set from JVM property[EPM_ORACLE_INSTANCE].
EPM_ORACLE_INSTANCE (C:\Oracle\Middleware\user_projects\epmsystem1) is set from JVM property[EPM_ORACLE_INSTANCE].
Setting HBR Mode to: 2
In lookupBRLWA()
Found HBR product = ESSBASE_PRODUCT
Found HBR product = ESSBASE_PRODUCT
Found HBR product = ESSBASE_PRODUCT
HBR LWA Component = Default
Default HBR = http://WIPLPRD01.svc.unicc.org:19000/eas
In getDBDetails()
Found HBR product = ESSBASE_PRODUCT
In lookupBRLWA()
Found HBR product = ESSBASE_PRODUCT
Found HBR product = ESSBASE_PRODUCT
=2013-11-05 20:35:08,234 WARN [ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)' com.hyperion.hbr.security.HbrSecurityAPI - Error retrieving user by identity
- Error retrieving user by identity
Embedded HBR initialized.
EnterData_Inner Processing Time:6
EnterData_Inner Processing Time:867
[Tue Nov 05 20:35:33 CET 2013] Planning successfully notified HBR repository.
EnterData_Inner Processing Time:7
2013-11-05 20:40:38,613 INFO Thread-67 calcmgr.launch - Date/Time Started: 2013/11/05:20:40:38.606 CET Server/Application/Database: localhost/1415_WP/AWP Business Rule Name: NonPersonnel_Calc By Planning user: wipoadmin Values entered for run-time prompts: [Variable] Funds:"Regular"[Variable] Units:"0001"[Variable] Wrk_Scenario:"Work_Plan_2014"
- Date/Time Started: 2013/11/05:20:40:38.606 CET Server/Application/Database: localhost/1415_WP/AWP Business Rule Name: NonPersonnel_Calc By Planning user: wipoadmin Values entered for run-time prompts: [Variable] Funds:"Regular"[Variable] Units:"0001"[Variable] Wrk_Scenario:"Work_Plan_2014"
2013-11-05 20:40:47,241 INFO Thread-67 calcmgr.launch - Date/Time Ended: 2013/11/05:20:40:47.241 CET Server/Application/Database: localhost/1415_WP/AWP Business Rule Name: NonPersonnel_Calc By Planning user: wipoadmin.
- Date/Time Ended: 2013/11/05:20:40:47.241 CET Server/Application/Database: localhost/1415_WP/AWP Business Rule Name: NonPersonnel_Calc By Planning user: wipoadmin.
EnterData_Inner Processing Time:44
EnterData_Inner Processing Time:2
EnterData_Inner Processing Time:525
EnterData_Inner Processing Time:1
Reaquired task list lease: Tue Nov 05 20:41:49 CET 2013: 1383680509246

I already replied there but it seems no moderator is willing to approve my reply so it never shows up.
So I'll try replying in here instead:
I never thought it could be an emulator issue, I thought I had done something wrong to begin with. So I take having performance issues with tiled layer is not a common problem I suppose?
I'm using MOTODEV SDK platform, A1200 model (motorola).

Are there Issues with poor performance with Maverick OS,

Are there issues with slow and reduced performance with Mavericks OS

check this
http://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/126081/10-9-2-slows-down-processes
or
this:
https://discussions.apple.com/message/25341556#25341556
I am doing a lot of analyses with 10.9.2 on a late 2013 MBP, and these analyses generally last hours or days. I observed that Maverick is slowing them down considerably for some reasons after few hours of computations, making it impossible for me to work with this computer...

Issues With GameCanvas Performance

Hello, recently I've been toying with java mobile applications, but I've run accross a problem I cannot overcome.
My LayerManager has two objects: the sprite and the tiled layer. Whenever I add the latter to my layer manager, I get 1-2 FPS when rendering the screen, but if I remove it and have only the sprite displayed, I get above 30 FPS.
My layer has the following properties:
TiledLayer mbg = new TiledLayer(15,20,tiles,16,16);
Any help appreciated.
PS: Getting 1-2 FPS on a crappy computer, but the same application running on a fast machine won't get past 11 FPS, although the main game loop is supposed to run at 20 FPS.
Edited by: 860823 on 23/05/2011 12:13

I already replied there but it seems no moderator is willing to approve my reply so it never shows up.
So I'll try replying in here instead:
I never thought it could be an emulator issue, I thought I had done something wrong to begin with. So I take having performance issues with tiled layer is not a common problem I suppose?
I'm using MOTODEV SDK platform, A1200 model (motorola).

Issue with Query on a virtual infoprovider

Hello,
I am getting the following error message while executing a query on a virtual infoprovider. We have recently gone through upgrade from BI 3.5 to BI 7.0 EHP1 (SP5) and from SEM BCS 4.0 to BCS 6.0.
EVersion not specified or not unique                                                             UCR0                006
EError reading the data of InfoProvider ZBCS_CV11                                    DBMAN             305ZBCS_CV11
EError while reading data; navigation is possible                                          BRAIN               289
I>> Row: 11 Inc: RAISE_READ_ERROR Prog: CL_RSDRV_VPROV_BASE   RS_EXCEPTION        301CL_RSDRV_VPROV_BASE
this query has been running fine before the upgrade. In the selection screen there are two fields - version1 and version2, if I am specifying same value in both the fields then the query runs fine and if I am providing different values then the above stated error message appears.
I have tried different settings with properties - Read mode: H,A,X and also different combination from the properties of the virtual infoprovider - with and w/o hierarchies; with and w/o navigation attributes but it did not workout.
the only thing which has changed on this virtual provider is that I had enabled delta caching as this was supposed to be used in a multiprovider.
Has anyone experienced similar issue or have an idea as to what is going wrong here. Please advice.
Regards,
Manish

Hi Manish,
I have exactly the same issue with a query on a virtual infoprovider after upgrading from BI 3.5 to BI 7.0 EHP1 (SP5) and from SEM BCS 4.0 to BCS 6.0.
Would you be so kind to tell me how you fixed this. (other queries seem to be working)
Kind regards,
Jamie Flaxman

Issues with Query Caching in MII

Hi All,
I am facing a strange problem with Query caching in MII query. Have created one xacute query and set cache duration 30 sec. The associated BLS with the query retrieves data from SAP system. In the web page this value is populated by executing an iCommand. Followings are the steps I followed -
Query executed for first time, it retrives data from SAP correctly. Lets say value is val1
At 10th sec Value in SAP changed to val2 from val1.
Query excuted at 15th sec, it gives value as val1. Which is expected as it gives from cache.
Query is executed 1t 35th sec, it gives value as val2 retriving from SAP system. Which is correct.
Query executed at 40th sec, it gives value as val1 from cache. Which is not expected.
I have tried with java cache clear in browser and JCo cache of the server.
Same problem I have seen for tag query also..
MII Version - 12.0.6 Build(12)
Any thoughts on this.
Thanks,
Soumen

Soumen Mondal,
If you are facing this problem from the same client PC and in the same session, it's very strange.. but if there are two sessions running on the same PC this kind of issue may come..
Something about caching:
To decide whether to cache a query or not, consider the number of times you intend to run the query in a minute. For data changing in seconds, and queried in minutes, I would recommend not to cache query at all.
I may give a typical example for query caching in a query on material master cached for 24 hours, where we know that after creating material master, we are not creating a PO on the same day.
BR,
SB

Problem with query performance

Hi All,
While loading data if we run the report, will it make any difference in the query performance? I have a cube with 230 million records I am running the delta which has got another 230 million records. Now I am trying to run the queries on the cube, all those timed out.
But I have a DSO with the 480 million the same queries are running good on the DSO. But I wanted to run the reports on the cube not on DSO what can I do? Is the data load giving any problem in the query runtime??
Pleas advise me what to do?
Regards
Kiran

Hi,
My load got finished, Now i created indexes and tried to run the query, every query on this cube times out.. but on the top of DSO we have Same queries those queries are running.. what could be the reason how can i go ahead to improve the query performance plzzz advise me
Kiran
Edited by: kiran kumar on Mar 14, 2009 1:28 AM

Issue with query output

hi there,
I have an issue with the display of hours 00:00:00 in the query output in BW.
The system assumes it as 0 or blank and therefore display it under unassigned hour.
I am using the reference of 0TIME for this hourly display.
When I checked the 0TIME i could not find the corresponding SID value for 00:00:00 hours.
Can anybody please advise what needs to be done?
Thanks in advance,
Kind regard,
Kate

Hi Kate,
I am experiencing the same problem as you: an InfoObject, created referencing 0TIME, represented in the BEX Query as "#" when the Value is "00:00:00".
How did you work it out?
The Formula Variable strategy is not applicable in this case because 0TIME is not a key figure !
Bye
Aldo

Issue with a "perform in program" call.

I am trying to do a call to a form in a zprogram. This call is being done inside an enhancement. The reason for this is because I can't delcare forms in the enhancement. Below is the issue:
The parameters I am trying to pass are typed as follows (in the SAP enhancement - SAP code):
types: begin of mrm_rbkpv.
        include structure rbkp_v.
types: begin of mmcr_drseg.
        include structure drseg.
types: mmcr_tdrseg type mmcr_drseg occurs 0.
I have the following as the call to the form and the form declaration:
PERFORM cancel_ret IN PROGRAM zcancel_retention USING e_trbkpv e_tdrseg[].
FORM cancel_ret USING p_tdrseg TYPE rbkp_v
                      it_tdrseG TYPE J_1IDRSEG.
I am getting a run-time error saying:
    An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.
    The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_DYN_CALL_ILLEGAL_TYPE', was
     not caught in
    procedure "EXIT_SAPLMRMP_010" "(FUNCTION)", nor was it propagated by a RAISING
     clause.
    Since the caller of the procedure could not have anticipated that the
    exception would occur, the current program is terminated.
    The reason for the exception is:
    Call to FORM "CANCEL_RET" is incorrect:
    The actual parameter no. 1 has a different data type in the
    PERFORM than requested for the FORM "CANCEL_RET" in program
     "ZCANCEL_RETENTION".
This is telling me that the system doesn't see e_trbkpv being the same type as p_tdrseg. However, I can't see why they aren't the same time. I also assume I will have the issue with the second parameter. The table type (in my opinion) J_1IDRSEG should be the same type as mmcr_drseg.
Any ideas? The enhancement I am using is EXIT_SAPLMRMP_010 (LMR1M001).
Regards,
Aaron
Edited by: Aaron Shover on Apr 11, 2009 7:21 PM

>
Aaron Shover wrote:
> OK, Aditya, I added another type pool to my program and I can now use the same type that SAP is using.
>
> Thanks for pointing out the [obvious] solution that I was overlooking!
>
> Aaron
Aaron, I was not aware of the type pools as mentioned I don't have access to the system at the moment. But type pool has type declarations as well, so what I meant was pulling out the 2 declarations that you need into your Z program could have solved the problem :). Which will happen now since you've included the type pools.
Anyways good to know that you problem is solved.
Cheers,
Advait

Sling mapping issue with Query String

For a button component, URL behaves differently with query string. Please let me know the sling mapping example for query string.
Button component behavior across env:-
Working Scenario:-
- In Author edit mode, URL pointing to "/content/<websitelink>"
- In Author preview mode shows URL "<host>:<port>/content/<websitelink>.html"
- In Publisher mode shows URL, "<host>:<port>/<websitelink>", we do not want "/content" before website link so it is fine.
Failure Scenario with query string:-
- In Author edit mode URL pointing to "/content/<websitelink>?username=han"
- In Author preview mode with URL "<host>:<port>/content/<websitelink>?username=han"
- In Publisher mode, <host>:<port>/content/<websitelink>?username=han - Here we see the content, which is not acceptable in our scenario.
Please let me know the mapping changes when we have a URL with query string.

1) I assume you configure as per the rules mentioned in http://sling.apache.org/site/mappings-for-resource-resolution.html --> 'Mapping Entry Specification' under /etc/map. Based on the configuration in /etc/map and the website that we publish, it translates and shows all the applicable combination in the Felix console http://<host>:<port>/system/console/jcrresolver.
2) How does Adobe CQ 5.4 resolve the right mapping, if we have multiple map folder like below in /etc directory with the same website with different rules.
etc/map --> http --> <website> with property sling:match, sling:internalRedirect
etc/map.publish --> http --> <website> with property sling:match, sling:internalRedirect
etc/map.publish-stag --> http --> <website> with property sling:match, sling:internalRedirect
Kindly clarify.

Performance issue with query when generated from an ODS

I am generating a query from an ODS. The run time is very high. How do I improve the performance of the query ?

Hi Baruah,
Steps:
1. Build the Secondary Index.
2. divide the data in to 2 ODS where Historical and Present data ODS's and then build a Multiprovider and build the query on multiprovider.
3. Build the Indexing on the Table level (ODS table level).
We cannot make much faster performance for the ODS's that too with huge data...
The above are very few of them...
Hope you understood ..
Regards,
Ravi Kanth

Issues with "Higher performance" setting on Macbook Pro with external monitor

Hi all,
I rarely used the "Higher performance" setting in the Energy Saver pane of System Preferences.
I use my MB connected with an external monitor, with its own screen closed. I tried to switch that setting on and the external monitor seems to repeatedly turn off and on. This strange behaviour vanishes if I open the MB's screen, using it in a double monitor configuration.
Did anyone hear about some similar problem?
p.s.: I don't know if this is the exact location for this thread, any suggestions is welcome

It was set to 1080p, 1920x1080 did not show up as an option (even when holding the option key). 1080p should be equivlant. As as experiment I grabbed another monitor that was not being used. It is a 22 inch LG with a maximum display of 1920x1080, and its currently set to 1920x1080. The issue is a little different, was not detected as a TV this time, but the screen still looks blurry. There may be some improvement but not much.

Issue with query performance

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for