Issue with STO over delivery

I am sure this topic has been taken up so many times before. I have browsed through almost all of them. I still do not have a way of restricting STO over delivery! Require your expertise!!.
My requirement is that STO over deliver should not occur when using VL10* transactions alone.
We tried to export a flag (say delv_flag)from program 'RVV50R10C' to shared buffer and import the same into BADI LE_SHP_DELIVERY_PROC (DELIVERY_FINAL_CHECK) to capture error message when STO over delivery is created. The entire logic is built based on this flag alone.We are deleting the flag in V50R_MAIN of the program 'RVV50R10C'.
There are some issues with this method:
1. In some cases the delete flag statement gets executed before importing from memory and hence an STO over delivery gets created. (I don't know how or why!).
2. When VL10* transaction is executed, the delivery flag is set. At this point in time, if the user tries to delete delivery without exiting the transaction, the BADI will get triggered and error message will be displayed. This is not correct functionality since error message should be displayed only for VL10* transactions.
Suggestion:
If I change the location of exporting the flag to include 'LV50R_VIEWF43' (form delivery_create), do you suppose it would work? Would Idocs trigger this?
If anybody has worked on similar requirement please share your inputs. Urgent!!!!
PS:
I have read about delivery tolerances too "The overdelivery tolerance functionality is available only for the deliveries created with reference to sales orders and not for deliveries created with reference for PO's or STO's".

Dear Sapna Morey
I think OMCQ T.Code-- Select message M7--024 Change from Waring to error
Please try once with this it may work To control over delivery tolarency in STO
Dear Lakshmipathi G sir
i have one doubt please clear me sir please
To control Over delivery tolarance in sap standard is not available , then what is the use of the above one.
Because i have searched a lot , i didnt find the logic about this
Thanks a lot sir please help me sir
Thanks

Similar Messages

Issue with Packing in Delivery document

Hi All,
I have an issue. Created a delivery with reference to the order, i am in the process of packing, not able to enter the packing material inHandling Units screen in the delivery document. if i am in VL02N screen but Handling unit screen shows as Display. Not able to enter the Packing material. Kindly suggest.
Regards,
SK

Hi,
First Create handling unit for packing....
By transaction HU02, you can create HU.
in HUPAST transaction ,packing is carry out.
U can put packing material manually in the HUPAST.
U ve to create HU Number range and material group packing material and packing material type....
This packing material type should be same in ur Material master... just go in SAP standard or by copying it.....
Try it.... if u could not..... just post the ERROR u r getting....

Issue with voice over narration for a presentation

When I record a voice over narration (Keynote 09) and then play back - the slides do not always play back with the sound. It seems to be an issue with slides using a build-up ... although it finishes - it then sticks and the sound for the next slide carries on out of sync to the visual - EG - every time I try it happens on the same slides - A good example is one that is followed by a .mov built into a slide. The sound track runs before the new slide image appears - Also I have problems with the movie - as the sound from the .mov file does not come through, so I have to record the movie sound on the narration rack .. confused!?

It sounds like you are making too many assumptions and not actually testing anything.
For instance, emoji may not cause issues for other contacts (maybe it is and you don't know it) but if I were testing this issue, the first thing I would do is remove the emoji from the contact info.
Next thing I would do is make a fake contact called "Home Other". And see if the Voice Control asks you to pick between Home and Home Other
Another thing I would do is add multiple numbers for your home contact (real or fake) And see if you can get the Voice control to find the contact and ask you what number you want to pick. (home or mobile)
And last thought that I had....You mentioned that the Voice Control dials a random person every time, but how random is it really? Are you sure that part of these people's names don't phonetically sound similar to the word Home?

Issue with length of delivery field displayed in LM06 on RF device

Hello everyone,
I have a challenging issue which I have posted on another forum as well, and was hoping that somebody on SDN may be familiar with this. This issue is being reported by one of our warehouses. SAP RF transaction LM06 is used extensively in this warehouse, and we use a 10 digit delivery number. The delivery field itself in SAP is 20 characters, and we have always displayed 10 on RF. The warehouse is telling me that about a week ago, the number of characters displayed on the RF device for the delivery field in LM06 changed from 10 to 9, and that a leading zero was being inserted when the barcoded delivery number was scanned. There have been no changes to the barcode on the picklist, and I am told there have been no changes to the printer that prints the pick list. A change was deployed a week ago that contained some unrelated configuration and a small code change in a user exit for transfer order creation. Neither of these is in any way related to LM06. Our basis team tells me that there have been no changes to the SAP console server, but I have no way to verify that myself as I am a WM functional consultant. Can anybody tell me if they have seen a problem like this before, or if the field display for a transaction like this is configurable in the SAP console server? The RF hardware being used is the Symbol PDT-8146. Unfortunately, I am 10,000 miles from the warehouse, which puts me at a bit of a disadvantage in trying to diagnose this.

Thank you both for the good feedback. I have also gotten some useful feedback from my posting on ittoolbox, and have forwarded all of the responses to a colleague who is located at the site where the warehouse is located. I will provide feedback once my colleague has had a chance to investigate further based upon the suggestions that I have received.

Issues with WebDav over SSL via Terminal Server when Accessing SharePoint 2013

Hi All,
We have deployed a terminal server from which multiple users access and heavily use SharePoint 2013 (hosted on a separate server). The SharePoint site is published to the internet and is operating over an SSL certificate. Over the last few months we have
been encountering a randomly occurring issue where all the users become unable to use Open with Explorer or mapped drives to access the site. During this time they can still access the site through the browser OK and download files etc. This issue sometimes
reoccurs every few days, although at points it hasn't occurred for a couple of weeks before resurfacing.
Current Terminal Server Config
TS 2008 R2 Enterprise
Site added to Trusted Sites. (have checked during broken time and still recognized as trusted)
Using IE 11, site added as compatibility view
Registries updated as below
reg add HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\WebClient\Parameters /v AuthForwardServerList /t REG_MULTI_SZ /d "*.clientsite.com"
reg add HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\WebClient\Parameters /v BasicAuthLevel /t REG_DWORD /d 2 /f
reg add HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\14.0\Common\Internet /v BasicAuthLevel /t REG_DWORD /d 2 /f
registry added for tabprocgrowth added to 2
My test result are below:
Restarting the SharePoint server or the terminal server will resolve the behaviour
until the issue occurs again.
Users on the terminal server can still open the
ttps://clientsite2.harrierhc.com
URL (this url is bound to the same UCC cert) with open with explorer during this time.
While users are unable to access the ttps://clientsite.harrierhc.com
URL, if they access the same site from WebDAV with a separate binding (e.g. ttp://clientsite the behaviour works fine.
All other users not on the terminal server can still use the open with explorer behaviour during this time.
IIS reset on the SP Server & restarting the web client service on the terminal server have no impact
Reimporting the IIS certs have no impact
There are numerous errors in both server’s event logs but none at the time of the issue instigation.
Clearing the IE cached certificates has no impact
Going to IE properties for the site and clicking the ‘Install Certificate’ has no impact
Any ideas or suggestions would be much appreciated. If you need any more info let me know. (sorry for the ttps:// links cant be posted until my account is verified?
Thanks again

Hiya,
are there any load balancers involved?

Valuation Type Issue with STOs

Hello Folks !!
In the client environment Materials are going to be Batch Managed as well as Split Valuated (by Country of Origin "H" Category).
When we create STOs, Valuation Type of the receiving plant is mandatory and it has to be specified up in the STO Order itself. [ According to SAP OSS Note: 66593]
The problem here is the Planner who is creating the STO is not going to know the Valuation Type of the Receiving Plant at the time of creating the STO.
The valuation type of the product will be known only at the time of Shipping. That is, upon delivery creation the Batches will be determined and the Shipping Valuation Type will be known.
Also Note that : If we pick any default valuation type at the time of the STO creation, that is going to create problems at the time of receiving at the receiving plant, because if a different valuation type is shipped than the one mentioned in the STO Order, the system is going to say, that the Batch Valuation Type and the Valuation Type Specified in teh STO are different.
What do you Experts Suggest !! How could this be resolved ??
Cheers

dear experts
we had faced similar issue and done enhancement to substitute Val Type of PDI to PO before GR.
But this has resulted in inconsistency in ML & MCHA.
The Financial & ML entry is posted at the time of PGI (641 mov type) and subsequent change on GR is not correct.
Now we have reverted the enhancement and finding alternative solution.
Some body suggested Automatic PO based on PGI.
regards
Hardy

WITHOUT STO RELEASE,SYSTEM WILLN'T ALLOW MATERIAL ISSUE WITH STO,IN SUP.PLA

Hai Expert,
I have one issue. please let me share..
I have created one STO. Then i am going for issue in suppling plant with reference to STO, With out sto release also system is accepting to release...
System should not allow to issue.. before STO RELEASE
PLEASE GUIDE ME HOW TO CONTROL

Sub-Contracting PO is subjected to release strategy..
Without Sub-Contracting PO release, system is accepting to issue material to subcontract vendor...
where as GRN is not accepting with reference to this po...
system has stop material issue also..
to control this.. what i have to do ??

Issue with Transporting MV50AFZ1(Delivery User Exit)

In the delivery user exit MV50AFZ1, there are two performs. The FORMS for these are in an include program. The Syntax check is fine, everything is activated.
When I move this to QA and double click on the perform it says that the form do not exist and ask if I want to recreate. Thatu2019s weird.
The syntax check in QA is fine.
There are no errors in the transport when I moved this to QA.
I generated the program in QA. Also re-transported several times but the problem persists.
Has anyone ran into this before?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
ALAM.

Hello,
You were not clear at all...is the include program on your QA?...if it is....go to the exit by SE80 and look for an option PROGRAM->GENERATE....it may solve the issue,
Bye
Gabriel P.

Issue with ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION)

Hi,
Please read the Thread completely, I have created a Report to see Yearly Turnover%, The report works fine but when I take Quarter and Months in it, it restricts the result to only 1 line(i.e., my first year's Turnover) and when I opened the Physical query, I saw the BI Server is using
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY)
which is not at all necessary.
*I tried disabling WITH_CLAUSE_SUPPORTED and PERF_PREFER_MINIMAL_WITH_USAGE but didn't get any resolution, Could anybody help me out?
thanks in Advance,
Anand

You said 'it restricts the result to only 1 line' means the value is nor drill down to next level?
In that case Yearly Turnover% is set to Year level?

IPhone issues with pics over iMessage

Our iphones are telling us that our pics we are tring to send are not delivered. But the other person can see it. Also I was using my iPad and it was having the same problem. Then when I checked my iPhone, the pics didn't sink with the message i had delivered. All the texts were there, but no photo. Also it's taking a really long time to sync with iCloud on our computer.

backup the device with itunes.
Restore the device with itunes and set up as new.
Sign into the facetime and imessage to activate it.
After that is done and activation is good.
Restore from the backup.
Then make sure to sign into facetime and imessage again and you should be good to go

Transparency issues with images over color backgrounds

I have a transparent .png that I place over a color background. When I do this, there's a slight discoloration in the image's transparent background. As a result, it looks the image really isn't transparent, but has a slight white background. I can't seem to get rid of this and have tried for days. Can anyone help me out here?

Thanks Robert. You're a lifesaver. This trick totally worked. You saved me a huge headache. I appreciate it.

Issue with voice over in imovie

The voice over I recorded in imovie is only coming out of one speaker. I think the term is "panned left". How do I get the voice over to sound in both speakers?

Window -> Record Voiceover
or
just press "V"

Delivery order for over delivery tolerance : SD module

Hi there,
i have a scenario and an abap enhancement is required by the client.The scenario is as below :
i have a sales order with 1 line item which has delivery quantity of 5000 (5.0 over delivery and under delivery tolerance).With the over delivery tolerance,i have an amount of 5250 which can be delivered. When i create a delivery order of 5000 items,it is fine.but after that,when i want to create another delivery order to for the remaining 250 ( which came from the over delivery tolerance) i am unable to create the delivery order.
What can i do to enable me to create the delivery order in this case.Need help.The client which im working on wants to maximize the sales by doing this enhancement.I previously was playing around with the vbuk status flags but it did not work. Please help me.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Nite,
I think this is the standard.If you are not able to manually then how come it is possible with either bapi or with some enhancement.What i am going suggest you is please post in sd forums and check the responses.
Regards,
Madhu.

STO- How to control Over delivery with batch split?

Dear All,
In STO Scenario, how to control the over delivery?
I created a PO for the Intra Company stock transfer & Delivery created in the Background with the T Code VL10B. When I am doing picking using T code VL02N, the system is allowing to add more than PO Quantity in batches and system displaying the warning message (Specified quantity is greater than the open quantity/Message no. VL287) & allowing to save the deliver document..
Hence plz suggest how to restrict the same.
Hope it is clear.
Thanks & Regards
varun

I am also in the same boat.
I searched the forum and got the link STO - How to control Over delivery ?
I checked OSS notes 548914, 386340,215488 but to no avail.
I suggested user exit USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE in include MV50AFZ1 to my technical team for finding the resolution. So far it is still on hold.
If you come across any other solution, you can update the forum so that it would be helpful for many others.
Regards,

STO - How to control Over delivery ?

Dear All,
In STO Scenario, how to control the over delivery?
Please note that I have already assigned a tolerance % in my Purchase Value key & same has been assinged to my material.
Now when I create a STO for this material system is picking up this Overtolerance percentage. But Still If I create a delivery more than the PO Qty (which exceeds the tolerance %). System is allowing to save the delivery.
Hence plz suggest how to restrict the same.
Please note that I am selecting the Partially Delivery indicator in STO as A - Create a delivery with qty. greater than zero Since tolerance wont work if I select Partially delivery allowed.
Hope it is clear.
Thanks & Regards,

From OSS note 548914 Over/underdelivry tolerances for GR/GI for stock transp.ord.
R E L E A S E < 4.70
Stock transport orders without SD processing / delivery (for example movement type 351 for the goods issue, Transaction MB1B, MB11):
During the creation of goods issues for stock transport orders the system does NOT include overdelivery tolerances (T156F-FELDM = DM07M-UETMG) maintained in the purchase order item. The system checks only against the quantity ordered during which the system may display message M7022, which can be customized. This is valid for both stock transfers within a company code and for cross-company-code stock transfers.
Stock transport orders with SD processing / delivery (for example movement type 641 for the goods issue, SD Transactions VL02, VL10):
If these are stock transport orders with SD processing, the system neither checksduring the goods receipt nor during the goods issue against the quantity ordered + overdelivery tolerance.
R E L E A S E >= 4.70
As of Release 470 there is, if required, a check against underdelivery tolerances (Field V_T161W-TOLKZ) during the goods issue for the stock transport order. Otherwise the checks are as described for the earlier releases. Customizing: IMG => Materials Management => Purchasing => Purchase Order => ..underdelivery tolerances

Issue with STO over delivery

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for