Issue with the standard SAP Extractor 2LIS_04_P_COMP

Hello gurus,
I am working on the PP and PM module. the standard extractor 2LIS_04_P_COMP is already in use in the development system .
I have made the changes to the Production Order (PO) and check the delta for the BW load the changes in the field release, deliver and PO confirm are not populated with the values, But when i check the same in COR3 tcode this PO has the above all status.
Could you please let me know why its behaving in this way. did any one has faced this scenario..
Regards

Hello Gurus,
In this extractor i am getting the negative values for the ENMNG (Withdrawn Quantity)  field for the after image records, for the good which are consume for the prodution. so i am getting the values in the report level as negative. could any one kindly let me know what the logic working behind this.
Regards

Similar Messages

  • Previous computer crashed without my Adobe CS3 Design Standard for Macintosh application being uninstalled, I'm having issues with the CS3 on my new Macintosh laptop. Please help!

    Since the previous computer crashed without my Adobe CS3 Design Standard for Macintosh applications being uninstalled, I'm having issues with the CS3 on my new Macintosh laptop. Please help, I've tried using the online "contact us" with no success, unable to get in contact with a tech support agent that can assist me.

    CS3 is too old to run on a new Macintosh laptop, sorry. You'll have to purchase CS6 or a Creative Cloud subscription.

  • Some issue with the Function Module u0093'SKWF_FIND_BY_QUERY' in a BW ECC6.0

    Hi All,
    Need some urgent help..
    Iam facing some issue with the Function Module “'SKWF_FIND_BY_QUERY' in a BW ECC6.0 system.
    As shown below, in the function module, the Table “IT_PROPERTIES_RESULT” gets populated with some values based on inputs like IT_CLASSES, IT_QUERY, and ‘L’.
    This updation of “IT_PROPERTIES_RESULT” table is happening for some of the services sent through IT_QUERY and is not getting populated for some.
      call function 'SKWF_FIND_BY_QUERY
    exporting
      CONNECTION_SPACE         =
        OBJ_TYPE                 = 'L'
      PTYPE                    =
      X_STRICT                 =
    IMPORTING
      ERROR                    =
         tables
         CLASSES                  = IT_CLASSES
         QUERIES                  = IT_QUERY
         RESULT_OBJECTS           = IT_LOIO
      PROPERTIES_REQUEST       = PROPERTIES_RESULT        = IT_PROPERTIES_RESULT.
    The values are as follows:-
    Values getting populated in IT_CLASSES – BW_LO_TRAN               Values getting populated in IT_QUERY – 1) BW_QUERY, 2) /BIC/ZSERVICE
    I would like to know whether any Standard Customizing BW transaction is present that is maintaining “IT_PROPERTIES_RESULT” table properties  and fetching through this Function Module.
    Also, suggest how this issue can be resolved
    Thanks & Regards,
    Shailesh nagar

    Thanks Suhas. That definitely helped.
    Also the following links helped.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/86/1c8c3e94243446e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    /people/siegfried.szameitat/blog/2005/09/29/generic-extraction-via-function-module
    Cheers,
    Preethi

  • Design issue with the multiprovider

    Design issue with the multiprovider :
    I have the following problem when using my multiprovider.
    The data flow is like this. I have the info-objects IobjectA, IobjectB, IobjectCin my Cube.(Source for this data is s-systemA)
    And from another s-system I am also loading the masterdata for IobjectA
    Now I have created the multiprovider based on the cube and IobjectA.
    However, surprisingly join in not workign in multiprovider correctly.
    Scenario :
    Record from the Cube.
    IObjectA= 1AAA
    IObjectB = 2BBB
    IObjectC = 3CCC
    Records from IobjectA =1AAA.
    I expect the record should be like this :
    IObjectA : IObjectB: IObjectC
    1AAA       :2BBB       :3CCC
    However, I am getting the record like this:
    IObjectA : IObjectB: IObjectC
    1AAA       :2BBB       :3CCC
    1AAA         : #             :#
    In the Identification section I have selected both the entries for IobjectA still I am getting this error.
    My BW Version is 3.0B and the SP is 31.
    Thanks in advance for your suggestion.

    May be I was not clear enough in my first explanation, Let me try again to explain my scenario:
    My Expectation from Multi Provider is :
    IObjectA
    1AAA
    (From InfoObject)
    Union
    IObjectA     IObjectB     IObjectC
    1AAA     2BBB     3CCC
    (From Cube)
    The record in the multiprovider should be :
    IObjectA     IObjectB     IObjectC
    1AAA     2BBB     3CCC
    Because, this is what the Union says .. and the Definition of the multiprovider also says the same thing :
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bw30b/helpdata/EN/ad/6b023b6069d22ee10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
    Do you still think this is how the behaviour of the multiprovider.. if that is the case what would be the purpose of having an infoobject in the multiprovider.
    Thank you very much in advance for your responses.
    Best Regards.,
    Praveen.

  • Issue in the standard report - S_ALR_87012357 outcome result

    Dear Friends,
    I am facing issues in the standard report S_ALR_87012357 "Advance Return on tax Sales/Purchases" where I am trying to pull the tax posting report for the current period.Here I would like to see the tax postings which are done with the custom t code ZFB01L (mass upload of data) which is the replica of FB01L. The issue here I see is, any postings done via custom t code with tax code does not appear in the standard report t code S_ALR_87012357. Please advice whether is there any alternative transaction code or program where in I can get all tax postings similar to this standard report or do we have to create a custom t code to get such report with the help of ABAPer.
    Kindly advice.
    Regards,
    Siri

    Dear expert
    Example :
    In Italy, you are required to register all you customer and vendor invoices about your company's sales and purchase activities within the country, in the European Union, or outside the European Union. According to the legal requirements, you need to create value-added tax (VAT) reports based on your customer and vendor invoices on a monthly basis. Depending on the size of your company, you can create the tax reports on a quarterly basis as well.
    You can use the Advance Return for Tax on Sales/Purchases (RFUMSV00) program to create tax reports (tax books) according to VAT types. It enables you to maintain your VAT registers per VAT types. You can create separate input and output tax reports about your sales/purchases activities in the country, in the European Union, or outside the European Union according to VAT types. The program enables you to save your reports with a report number (for example: 1/2008, 2/2008), and it generates a summary per VAT code at the end of the report. The program ensures the correct progressive page numbering of tax reports and calculates the debit and credit balance for the given VAT type. You can carry forward the credit balance to the following month.
    SE38 :RFUMSV00 =S_ALR_87012357
    PATH
    Accounting ® Financial Accounting ® General Ledger ® Reporting ® Tax Reports ® General ® Advance Return for Tax on Sales/Purchases ® Advance Return for Tax on Sales/Purchases.
    Under
    Set the following indicator(s)
    Output control :Read address data
    Output lists
    Output tax: Line items
    Input tax: Line items
    Regards
       Ajeesh.s

  • Paper Type issue with Adobe Standard X printing from browser

    I work in IT and have two users who suddenly started having a problem printing PDFs from a browser (IE9).  We cannot upgrade the borwser to 10 or 11 because it becomes incompatible with a few of our in house websites.  I uninstalled standard and installed Adobe Reader XI and did not experience the same problem, but they are in need of Standard X in order to do their job.
    What happens is when the PDF opens in the browser and they go to printer, the default for paper type is High Gloss paper instead of plain or unspecified.  This doesn't happen if we open a pdf from the desktop and print and the default for the driver is plain.  Yes, we could save the document and then print it, but they feel that takes more time and I have to find out why this is happening. Any help would be very appreciated.
    Windows 7 32 Bit PC
    Internet Explorer 9

    Probable issue with the Firefox is that in the documentation it is poorly worded poorly,  JIDS only support FF 17.
    What is the issue with IE if that does fix the FF issue?

  • Can we remove the Technical name appearing in the standard SAP BI Pop-Up.

    Hi,
    Can we remove the Technical name appearing in the standard SAP BI Pop-Up Varaiable Screen(Selection Screen)-When we create Variable screen for BI Reporting we should specify the technical name and create it,where it appears in the Pop-Up screen within the brackets,can technical name  be removed ?
    Please help me out to solve this issue.
    Thanks,
    Preethi

    Hi,
    As per my logic, one can change description of all bi objects which includes text Input variables also.
    If possbile be more specific what u want to change in Pop
    Regards,
    Sachinkumar.

  • Input data to the standard SAP screen .

    How to input data to the standard SAP screen . ?
    i am using BADI HRHAP00_ENHANCE_FREE to add some functionality to the screen of transaction PHAP_CREATE.
    =================================
    i am calling this FM 'F4IF_INT_TABLE_VALUE_REQUEST'
    in the BADI and i have to update the fields in the screen of the main program which is calling this BADI (HRHAP00_ENHANCE_FREE).
    This BADI is called at the button click .
    ZOBJECT_TABLE is a Z- table with values out which we have to select the value.
    and the value should be filled in the screen field as we select the record from the help.
    ====================================
    the screen is SAPLHRHAP_UI_DOCUMENT -
    SCREEN  3100
    The elements doesnt even have parameter ids .
    please suggest me how can it be done
    thanks in advance .
    Naval Bhatt

    Hi,
    I have solved the problem and my work is done properly.

  • Has anyone else had problem with the STANDARD package?

    Hi Oracle gurus, has anyone here had the same problem with the STANDARD package? Or do I have to reinstall Oracle to make it work?
    Thanks.
    Ben

    missesboggs wrote:
    I literally just called AT&T and Apple about this today.  I was having issues with iMessage and texting my husband.  His texts back to me would show up as my name.  Turns out it's because we share the same AppleID.  So, I'm currently trying to change mine, but it hasn't worked so far.  I'm on hold with Apple right now to see if I can get it fixed.
    Both of you have registered the same email address for iMessage. If you were using a shared Apple ID and you updated your phones to iOS5, the default will be the Apple ID. Go into settings and change it.

  • Ok, so I have a 1g macbook Pro and I'm having an issue with the graphics card, so I believe.

         I believe I'm having an issue with the graphics card. For one, when I'm using programs like iMovie '11, SPORE, or the Sims 3  for long periods (hours usualy) of time, the computer will be perfectly fine. It gets warmish-hot, like usuall, all of a sudden it will randomly freeze for 5 to 10 seconds, then shut down and reststart. This happens, espically on the Sims 3 I can play for a while, but when I try to save it will shut down on me.
         Also, I got a new iPod touch 4g on the 25th, the first few times I tried syncing and downloading, it started off fine, but after 10 min. it would restart. Now it works ok, but I still monitor it just incase.
         Can anyone help me understand why all of this is happening? I beleve the graphics card isn't good enough, even though it meets the standards for iLife, and The Sims 3. My graphics card is a ATI,RadeonX1600. The laptop has 2 GB RAM runs at 2.16GHz with an Intel Core Duo on OS X Snow Lepard (10.6.8). Thanks everyone.

    Threads are just processes that link together like the threads in these discussions, well, maybe that is a bad example given how disjointed these get
    It looks like you are not pushing the cpu or hard drive enough to cause your behavior.  Not sure what the temperature limit on that cpu is, on the newer models it is around 100-110 °C which is notciabley hot, and the system shutsdown for self protection at the thermal limit.
    You could be hitting a thermal limit causing that behavior...so do you see good behavior at lower load levela on the system?  Does this only happen with when you are under the high graphic loads?
    Trying to zero in on when this occurs to see if we an isolate the problem.

  • Ipod nano 7th generation having issues with the UI. Out of box everything worked great. Once I snyc the device and it finished, the UI becomes unuesable. You have to double tap every icon in order to open music, videos, etc.  I cannot swipe to the second

    ipod nano 7th generation having issues with the UI. Out of box everything worked great. Once I snyc the device and it finished, the UI becomes unuesable. You have to double tap every icon in order to open music, videos, etc.  I cannot swipe to the second page of icons,  black box appears around an icon and then switches to a different one anytime I swipe. A box even appears around the time and battery power. iPod & iTunes are both updated. What is the FIX on this issue?

    I had this problem as well.  This is what I found by searching online.  I tried the fix on my nano 7th gen and it worked.  I hope this helps you.  Make sure to use two fingers for sliding and double-click the icons to get into settings.  Good luck.
    It would seem that Voiceover has been enabled on your iPod Nano. The following article contains information regarding Voiceover, and how to disable it once it's been enabled.
    iPod nano (6th generation and later): How to use VoiceOver
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4317
    To turn off VoiceOver on iPod nano using VoiceOver gestures
    From the Home Screen, swipe right or left with two fingers until you see or hear "Page 2 of 2" on iPod nano (7th generation) or "Settings" on iPod (6th generation).
    If the icons have been rearranged, or if there are more than four Home screens, you may hear something different.
    Slide one finger around the screen until you hear Settings. 
    Double-tap to open Settings. 
    Slide your finger up or down the screen until you see or hear General, then double- tap. 
    Slide your finger up or down the screen until you see or hear Accessibility, then double-tap. 
    Slide your finger up or down the screen until you see or hear VoiceOver, then double-tap. 
    Double-tap when you hear "VoiceOver switch button on." 
    You'll hear "VoiceOver off" to confirm the setting. Now you can use standard gestures to control iPod nano.
    Note: You can also turn off VoiceOver by resetting your iPod.

  • VERY URGENT: Issue with Reconciliation against SAP Enterprise Portal

    Hi,
    We are using IDM7.0 and we have SAP Enterprise Portal as a resource. The users in portal are from Active Directory.
    When I am doing full reconciliation against portal, it is processing only certain accounts. The reconcilaition policy is to link accounts. It is not linking teh accounts. Moreover, these accounts are not found in UNMATCHED accounts also. I don't have any account exclusion rules or something.
    I wrote a small code snippet, which does just a single account reconciliation of a particular user id. In this case the portal account is being reconciled and linked properly.
    Any ideas what the issue might be?
    And I have another question too.. in the schema attributes of the out-of-box SAP Portal resource adapter, I don't see any ammping entry for "accountId". Usually for other resource adapters there would be entry for accountId (e.g in AD, mapping is: accountId <---> sAMAccountName). In case of portal, do we need to explicitly set this mapping? If so what would be the right hand side name in the schema? Does the right hand side name changes from one deployment to the other? If so how to determine what attribute maps to accountId in our portal? Might this lack of accountId is causing the issue with the reconciliation?
    Any leads would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    kIDMan.

    Thanks for the reply. I have already set up correlation rule, account linking options for different situations like FOUND, UNASSIGNED, UNMATACHED etc. If my linking configurtaion is not correct then the fetched accounts should be atleast in the account index with situation as UNMATCHED. But that is not the case.
    I am not sure if I made my problem difinition clear earlier. The problem I mentioned is not with "linking" of the accounts. The problem is IDM is detecting only some accounts. Among those set of accounts which IDM was able to fetch from portal during reconcilaition, it was able to successfully link the matching accounts to identities in IDM.
    My question is, why IDM is fetching only certain accounts and not all accounts from portal resource.
    As I mentioned earlier, when I run my code snippet to reconcile a single account, it reconciles successfully and links to user identity in IDM (if a matching idenity exists based on my correlation rule). But why the reconcilaition at the resource level is not able to fetch and reconcile teh same account.
    Regarding the accountId attribute in the attribute schema, neither the SUN documentation nor the resource adapter configuration tells about the name of the attribute on the portal side that it should match to.
    Thanks,
    kIDMan.

  • Performance issue with the Select query

    Hi,
    I have an issue with the performance with a seclet query.
    In table AFRU - AUFNR is not a key field.
    So i had selected the low and high values into s_reuck and used it in Where condition.
    Still i have an issue with the Performance.
    SELECT SINGLE RUECK
    RMZHL
    IEDD
    AUFNR
    STOKZ
    STZHL
    FROM AFRU INTO table t_AFRU
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN T_ZSCPRT100
    WHERE RUECK IN S_RUECK AND
    AUFNR = T_ZSCPRT100-AUFNR AND
    STOKZ = SPACE AND
    STZHL = 0.
    I had also cheked by createing an index for AUFNR in the table AFRU...it does not help.
    Is there anyway that we can declare Key field while declaring the Internal table....?
    ANy suggestions to fix the performance issue is apprecaited!
    Regards,
    Kittu

    Hi,
    Thank you for your quick response!
    Rui dantas, i have lill confusion...this is my code below :
    data : t_zscprt type standard table of ty_zscprt,
           wa_zscprt type ty_zscprt.
    types : BEGIN OF ty_zscprt100,
            aufnr type zscprt100-aufnr,
            posnr  type zscprt100-posnr,
            ezclose type zscprt100-ezclose,
            serialnr type zscprt100-serialnr,
            lgort type zscprt100-lgort,
          END OF ty_zscprt100.
    data : t_zscprt100 type standard table of ty_zscprt100,
           wa_zscprt100 type ty_zscprt100.
    Types: begin of ty_afru,
                rueck type CO_RUECK,
                rmzhl type CO_RMZHL,
                iedd  type RU_IEDD,
                aufnr type AUFNR,
                stokz type CO_STOKZ,
                stzhl type CO_STZHL,
             end of ty_afru.
    data : t_afru type STANDARD TABLE OF ty_afru,
            WA_AFRU TYPE TY_AFRU.
    SELECT AUFNR
            POSNR
            EZCLOSE
            SERIALNR
            LGORT
            FROM ZSCPRT100 INTO TABLE T_ZSCPRT100
            FOR ALL ENTRIES IN T_ZSCPRT
            WHERE   AUFNR = T_ZSCPRT-PRTNUM
            AND   SERIALNR IN S_SERIAL
            AND    LGORT   IN S_LGORT.
        IF sy-subrc <> 0.
           MESSAGE ID 'Z2' TYPE 'I' NUMBER '41'. "BDCG87
           stop."BDCG87
        ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
    SELECT    RUECK
                  RMZHL
                  IEDD
                  AUFNR
                  STOKZ
                  STZHL
                  FROM AFRU INTO TABLE T_AFRU
                  FOR ALL ENTRIES IN T_ZSCPRT100
                  WHERE RUECK IN S_RUECK     AND
                        AUFNR = T_ZSCPRT100-AUFNR AND
                        STOKZ = SPACE AND
                        STZHL = 0.
    Using AUFNR, get AUFPL from AFKO
    Using AUFPL, get RUECK from AFVC
    Using RUEKC, read AFRU
    In other words, one select joining AFKO <-> AFVC <-> AFRU should get what you want.
    This is my select query, would you want me to write another select query to meet this criteria..
    From AUFNR> I will get AUFPL from AFKO> BAsed on AUFPL I will get RUECK, based on RUEKC i need to read AFRU..but i need to select few field from AFRu based on AUFNR....
    ANy suggestions wil be appreciated!
    Regards
    Kittu

  • [svn:osmf:] 10644: fixed some layout issues with the MediaPlayerWrapper.

    Revision: 10644
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-09-28 09:36:33 -0700 (Mon, 28 Sep 2009)
    Log Message:
    fixed some layout issues with the MediaPlayerWrapper.
    Modified Paths:
        osmf/trunk/apps/samples/framework/MediaPlayer/src/com/adobe/strobe/players/MediaPlayerWra pper.as
        osmf/trunk/apps/samples/framework/MetadataSample/src/MetadataSample.mxml
    Property Changed:
        osmf/trunk/libs/VAST/

    Hi Chanh
    I have not come upto the level of testing the file generated with IRS.  Will keep you posted what happens there.
    Shannon,
    Apparently the new version of 1546868 fixes the issue for box number 7.  But if the amounts are huge in box numbers 1 or 3 or 15a (they use these in my client) then the amount overflows to the nearby box.  So we have again opened an issue again with SAP & will keep you posted withwhat SAP comes up with.
    Thanks
    Regards
    Morgan

  • Issue with the collective billing from two deliveries.

    Hi,
    I just want to make sure what is the right customizing in SAP standard
    in order go get one invoice from two deliveries that belong to the same
    sales order. I mean Sales order 1000001 with two deliveries 500001 and
    500002 and just want billing document.
    I have been checking the customizing control copy from delivery to
    Billing document transaction VTFL and I have tried with the
    configuration for VBRV/VRRP 001 however I get always two billings
    documents and in the analyst of the spilt document the system shows
    that the number of the deliveries are different so doesnu2019t make any
    sense because the deliveries numbers have to be different. I have also
    tried with the option VBRV/VRRP 003 but the result it is the same.
    I guess this requirement it is possible do get in the standard SAP.
    Thank you  and best regards.

    Hi Martin
    If the Header data for billing are different, then you can not combine the deliveries into one Billing document.
    For example, you can not have two different Payer or two different Payment Terms in one Billing document. 
    Therfore,if the
    PAYER,PAYMENT TERM, BILLING DATE,  DESTINATION COUNTRY AND INCOTERM are different then you can not combine them in one Billing document, whatever settings you may do .
    In standard settings ,if the above criterias are same, then system always tries to combine the deliveries into one Billing document (provided you have not set any item dependent Invoice split).
    Ensure in the copy control VTFL, at Item level, Copying requirement should be "004" and in the VBRK/VBRP field value should be "001"
    at Header level,Copying requirement should be "003".
    If you have not used any user exits or have not made any Item dependent Invoice split etc, then this above settings must meet your requirement.
    In your case just check, whether the criterias for combining the deliveries are same or different for both the deliveries.

Maybe you are looking for