Issues regarding theMarker value in inventory BI 7.0

Hi,
We are facing an issue with the marker update for Stock vertical.
As per the process defined by SAP we have loaded the stock report using the marker value of 2LIS_03_BX.
1.     We ran setup table in R/3 system for initial value of stock on 26th April 2009
2.     Marker value was loaded in the inventory cube from 2LIS_03_BX and compressed with Marker Update.
3.     Historical movements were loaded from 2LIS_03_BF to cube.
4.     The historical records were compressed with u201CNo Marker Updateu201D.
5.     The delta loads were started for the inventory cube.
We came across some materials that were giving incorrect stock values.
Due to marker value was not coming correct from the extractor 2lIS_03_BX.
The reason for this was that there were some material documents that were created on 27th of April 2009 were having there posting dates in 16th April 2009.
As the initialization was done on 26th April, the above mentioned documents did not affect the marker valued and hence they resulted in incorrect calculation of stock.
We would like to get input on how we can rectify the marker value.
Kindly help us if someone has faced the same scenario in SAP BI 7.0 related to Stock/Inventory Cube.

If you cannot ask business users to reverse the document, I guess you have to reverse them by yourself. The key point here is that your document was not counted in your initial balance. So you have to remove them without touching the marker and reload them with marker update.
If you cannot identify those documents, I guess you have to do everything again in a clean way.
If you can identify them, you could do it in the following way.
1. Load those documents in a repair load.
2. update your transformation rule a little bit to reverse your key figure. If it's 100, make it -100. Don't touch anything else.
3. Now load these documents into the cube without marker update.
4. Put your transformation rule back to original.
5. Load the documents again in a repair load.
6. Load them into your cube with marker update.
You need to temporary hold your delta process while doing the above.

Similar Messages

Value of inventory after Goods Issue, before Goods Receipt for open order

Dear Experts,
Raw materials R72 and R82 are required to produce Semifinished Product S10.
Semifinished product S10 is required to produce Fnished product F20
On 10th August 2011, I created and release a Process Order for material S10 copying component materials R72 and R82.. Goods issue for component materials R72 and R82 were done for this process order using tcode MIGO (mvt type 261).
It takes four to five days to properly blend components R72 and R82 to obtain S10.
It means Goods Receipt for this process order will be done on 14th or 15th August when this blending has been completed.
Management suddenly issues a directive that stock take should be carried out in the plant on the 12th August 2011, and my process order is still open and cannot be closed ( or goods receipt cannot be done) because blending is yet to be completed.
Please how do I take care of this scenario/situation since Goods Issue has been done already?
How will the Accountants see or get the correct value of inventory?

When I run WIP Calculation for my Process Order, what will be the effect ? I mean what accouts are updated by WIP Calculation within a period (not across a perion or at period end)?
GI values issued to the Process order will come into WIP GL .( Since your client want to know the stock take should be carried out in the plant on the 12th August 2011- we are doing WIP calculation)
> After this WIP Calculation is run, and say about 2days later, Goods Receipt for this process order is to be posted, what steps am I suppose to carry out?
After GR Made, Run a WIP calculation again for the order so that The WIP from the GL account will get reduced ,now WIP= (GI value + confirmation ) -(GR Value),
Check in DEV system before doing in PRD,
On Month end, do the variance calculation and do the settlement

Negative values in inventory

Hi All,
I'm negative values in inventory,what all i did is,
1) At BI side i loaded data for BX and compressed the request with out selecting the NO MARKER UPDATE
2) After loading BF i compressed the request with selecting the NO MARKER UPDATE
3) Then i unchecked the NO MARKER UPDATE.
Now only first two requests are compressed, is it ok? how about delta loads of BF?
Kindly help me solving the issue,is the above steps are right? if so why im getting negative values?
Regards,
Yunus

Hi Yunus,
BX is used to initialize the stock not for the historical movements.
Initialize the stock is mandatory after that anyway you need the delta movements to be happened so BF is also required, if you don't want to load historical movements then you load only Delta loads but for both of them BF is the data source.
check this link for inventory
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/93ed1695-0501-0010-b7a9-d4cc4ef26d31
For movements of the material price you use 0processkey,
Transaction key 51
Revaluation through a material price change (for example, with transaction MR21) and the debit/credit indicator = DEBIT.
like that there are some keys 52, 151 and 152
To know more about these check the OSS note 492828
Regards
Pcrao.

Issue regarding Planning layout is not getting rendered and is dumping at : CL_RSDRC_TREX_QUERY_LAYER ~ _GET_PARTPROVS_WITH_TREX_PART in SAP TPM IP

Gurus,
I am facing an issue regarding SAP TPM IP ( HANA)
I have 3 Infoproviders
Planning infocube, Planning DSO1, Planning DSO2 and i created multiprovider and added these 3 infoproviders into it. I have created Aggregation level on multiprovider. Created Bex Input ready query on Aggregation level.
Issue is Planning layout is not getting rendered and is dumping at : CL_RSDRC_TREX_QUERY_LAYER ~ _GET_PARTPROVS_WITH_TREX_PART.
I tried debugging it and found it is trying to read i_r_pro -> n_ts_part. It is populated with only 3 values (i.e. 2DSOs and 1 Cube), whereas <l_partprov>-partprov is referring to Aggergation level, hence read statement isn't successful, it is dumping.
The class CL_RSD_INFOPROV_CACHE->GET() method is trying to populate the N_TS_PART.N_TS_PART uses P_R_INFOPROV table which seems to be already populated. So, I debugged all the below methods to find out how the P_R_INFOPROV but couldn't find any clue.
Can any one help,it would be really help.
Thanks
Ashok

Hello Gregor,
On the launch of planning layout it throws an error message:
Planning is not possible RSCRM_IMP_CORE008.
When I debugged, i got to a point wherein
particular Real Time Planning DSO is
not getting retrieved under the MultiProivder in below class.
Class: CL_RSCRM_IMP_ACTIONS_SERVICE, Method: GET_INFOPROV is not
returning the real time Info-Provider Name(i.e. Planning DSO)
underlyingthe Multiprovider.
I've also tried to run the report mentioned by you for the Multiprovider but issue still exists.
Let me know, if you have any pointers on this topic.
Thanks,
Jomy

Issue regarding currency conversion

Hi Experts,
I'm having issue with currency conversion. Default report output values are displaying in 'EURO' and I had created a toolabar with currency conversion buttons. When this button is selected, values has to be changed into user select currency like INR, USD, AUD. Here im triggering with issues, all the values are converted into 0's. Total value is only converting for first time. From next time. its not converting. I'm using FM's CONVERT_FOREIGN_TO_FOREIGN_CUR,CONVERT_TO_LOCAL_CURRENCY,READ_EXCHANGE_RATE.
Please provide ur solutions to solve the issue.
Thanks and Regards,
Bharat

Hi ,
You can use this block of code..It is used in our project.
data : l_rate type ukurs_curr,           "Exchange rate
         l_rate_type type kurst_curr,      "Type of rate
         l_l_fact type i,                  "Local factor
         l_f_fact type i.                  "Foreign factor
check local currency ,foreign currency local amount are not initial
check foreign_currency is not initial and
        local_currency is not initial and
        local_amount is not initial.
Calculate exchange rate
    if local_currency = 'MXN' and foreign_currency = 'USD'.
      l_rate_type = 'MXNT'.
   else.
     l_rate_type = 'M'.
   endif.
*Call FUNCTION module to get exchange rate
call function 'READ_EXCHANGE_RATE'
    exporting
      date                    = sy-datum
      foreign_currency        = local_currency
      local_currency          = foreign_currency
      type_of_rate            = l_rate_type
   importing
     exchange_rate           = l_rate
     foreign_factor          = l_f_fact
     local_factor            = l_l_fact
   exceptions
     no_rate_found           = 1
     no_factors_found        = 2
     no_spread_found         = 3
     derived_2_times         = 4
     overflow                = 5
     zero_rate               = 6
     others                  = 7
if sy-subrc eq 0.
if l_rate le 0.
l_rate = l_rate * -1.
endif.
Foreign amount
if l_rate_type = 'MXNT'.
    foreign_amount = local_amount / l_rate .
else.
    foreign_amount = local_amount * l_rate .
endif.
endif.

Issue Regarding Transfer Rules

Hi All,
We have an issue regarding Transfer Rules. We are loading Data using 0FI_GL_4 into ZFIGL_A01. It is a periodic load of data.
Last month due to some issue in R/3 we have to replicate the Data Sources and retransport the Transfer Rules from BW Dev to BW Production. Next we loaded data into the InfoCube. Now when we execute the report for the current period I am not getting Master Data Values. All are coming as Not Assigned.
We have tracked down the issue and found that the issue may be incorrect mapping of Tranfer Rules. Is there any way in Prd where we can revert back to old version of Transfer Rules or can find the old mappings in Transfer Rules.
Regards
Jay

Hi Jay,
The only way you can find your old transfer rules mapping is to goto RSA1 -
> Infosource -> Tools -> Program and compare the versions .
Bye
Dinesh

-ve values in inventory report

Hi Experts,
I have inventory report, this report shows total stock, in this report some materials are showing '-ve' values,but in cube total issue stock and total received stock both are same, that means this inventory report should show '0' value.
for example: in cube total issues stock: 13.60, total received stock: 13.60. That means total stock is = 0 (13.60-13.60), but in report it is showing -13.60.
I am not understanding what is the problem,
Pl help to do this,
good answer will be appriciated.
thanks in advance,
Venkat

Hi Venkat,
The calculation's of Inventory total stock is not as simple as we understand them. To calculate total stock it consider different Movement type's, reversal entries, blocked stock etc. as well into consideration.
There is no -ve stock and there can be no as well, but still u r getting that (i also got that ) then this is how u can analyze at various points where exactly the problem is.
1. Try to run some standard report for total stock (based on inventory Cube 0IC_C03 i guess this is u usign probably). Check the stock value for 1 or two particular Material and cross check the stock of same material in your R/3 system through some tr MMBE.
2. If standard report gives u rite result then probably some logic problem in ur report.
3. Apart from that the main problem of this situation is data loading issue.
Please follow proper inventory data loading steps. If not done step by step u will end up with wrong data.
Hope these steps will help you out in tracking the situation.
Thanks
Dipika Tyagi

Report showing GL Accountwise Open, Reciept,Issue,and Closed Value

Hi.,
i want to do a report that shows GL Accountwise Open, Reciept,Issue,and Closed Value based on Posting Date. Is there any standard report available.Please guide me how to do this.Please tell me the list tables to be accessed .
Regards.,
S.Sivakumar

Transaction FBL4N

Issue regarding implementing the PM Spare Parts Scanning process

Dear friends,
I have the following issue. It seams that the client, who want to implement the scanning procedure for the PM Spare Parts, can not do this with wireless scanners if the maintenance of the spare parts is done with Inventory Management means and has requested to implement Warehouse Management integration. The fact is that I know that IM can be use. And I know, also, that the basic needs for IM use is that the materials have activated the Batch Management and, the scanning is based on batch bar code/material bar code, together with - for GR - PO bar code and, for GI - the WO bar code. But the issue regarding the wireless baffles me. Please, can you tell me what is the way for setting the wireless connection for the scanners in IM? Thank you very much for your kindness.
Sorin

hi,
It basically depends how your business process is designed for producing Spare Parts before they are reworked.
rework order can be cerated without material with reference to original production order whcih is responsible for proeducing that SFG.
consider below lonks:
http://help.sap.com/bp_bl603/BBLibrary/HTML/151_EN_US.htm

One issue regarding PPDS OP.confirmation from Legal Non-SAP system

Dear Experts
we met a BAPI function issue regarding PPDS Operation.confirmation from Legal Non-SAP system.
scenario is as following:
we want to build the interface between PPDS and non-SAP system, regarding OP. and order confirmation inbound processing.
now we input simulated inbound date and test using BAPI: BAPI_MOSRVAPS_CONFOPRMULTI
but we find a problem, even we set different value for fields ‘ duration’ in function. after call BAPI, It didn't reflect the 'net duration' or 'remaining duration', these fields not changed through check in Tcode:/SAPAPO/RRP3 for single operation.
In the meanwhile , but it works for fields 'confirmed Yield' and fields 'confirmed Scrap' for single operation.
my questions is that: if we need to synchronize the operation confirmation( including confirmed yield,confirmation scrap, duration)，do we use the correct BAPI for this or do we need an additional BAPI, please hints.
Thanks a lot! any feedback would be welcome!
Best Regards
Kevin

Hi Kevin,
Yes you use the right BAPI.
you have to use table OPERATION_CONFIRMATION.
You cannot just set the duration. You have to trigger time event confirmations.
The field duration according to the documentation currently not supported.
You need to use CONFIRMATION_TYPE
0100 Start of Setup
0150 End of setup
0200 Start of processing
0300 Partially complete
0350 Complete
Not sure if all confirmation types are supported by the BAPI.
You can also set start and end time but not sure either whether it is supported or not.
Regards,
Uli

Re: Issue in Decimal value round off in DB2

Hi All, It is happening only only when the decimal separator of source is ',' and behaving normally when decimal separator is '.'. Some how ..we casted the incoming field to TO_DECIMAL(IN_FIELD,2) ..in that case it is working fine. Regards,Srinivas

Hi All, I am facing an issue wherein Decimal value of 0.01 is getting converted to 0.00. Let me brief you about Source-target Types - Source - Flat FileTarget - DB2Powercenter Version - 9.6.1 HF2 Issue - Field in Source File is defined as Number(5,2).Corrosponding field from Db2 Target Table is defined as Decimal(5,2). Mapping is simple straight forward mapping with 1:1 loading from Source to target. Now, my Source File contain data as below - 0.010.020.0312.01 When I execute mapping, DB2 target Table gets loaded with all records.Value from corrosponding DB2 Target Table is - 0.000.020.0312.01 As you can see value of 0.01 is getting converted to 0.00 whereas all other values are working fine as expected. As a quick fix, I have applied to_decimal(source_field,2) before loading it to target. Could anyone please explain if this is an issue with Powercenter or there's some other issue. If I think it's a rounding issue then how come value of 0.02 is working fine? Please advise.

Critical B2B issue regarding component seprator

Hi Guru's
we are facing one critical issue regarding component seprator. We want to have folling component seperator delimiter as "|" (HEXA 0x7c) e.g
ISA*00* *00* *01*041158668 *07*5051379000004 *100203*1259*^*00501*000001505*0*P*|~
where as we are getting ">" (hexa 0x3e)
ISA*00* *00* *01*041158668 *07*5051379000004 *100421*1532*^*00501*000001049*0*P*>~
I tried changing the value in capabilities of TP but it didn't effected the result. Also I tried changing the defualt values in Business Action but the result remained same.
Please advise us on how to resolve this issue. Its a requirement for us to have 0x7c.
any pointers will be highly appreciated.
Regards
Sahil

Hi Sahil,
Override the default/current values in the operational capability of Remote Trading partner and revalidate and redeploy the agreement. Make sure that you are not passing internal properties from the back-end.
In case still the issue persists, mail back your b2b log, ecs file and payload.
Regards,
Anuj

I am having an issue regarding a placed order via customer service department

I recently relocated to Anchorage Alaska as part of a permanent change of station per the United States Air Force. I was initially located on the East Coast in the lower 48 and at the time of activating my contract I had purchased two separate Iphone 4 devices. I also recently went in to a store in February to purchase a Nexus 7 as well.
Upon arrival in Anchorage I had multiple issues regarding the Iphone 4 devices including being unable to send and receive text messages & imessages, unable to make phone calls, dropped phone calls, unable to utilize GPS, as well as not being able to access general account information and use anything related to web browsing or data usage. It was determined that because the Iphone 4 operates on the 3g network and Verizon does not have a 3g network in Alaska, as a result I was utilizing an extended service network from another carrier. As a result of this I am only able to use my Iphone 4 devices while connected to my wi-fi network while within my home, which is totally unacceptable.
I was not made aware that I would be dealing with this when I moved to Alaska and inquired as the the use of the devices I currently owned prior to purchasing the tablet. I was assured by three separate store employees one of which being a manager that all devices would function at 100% efficiency including the Iphone 4s. In fact I was recently billed 350$ for roaming charges last month, which prompted me to speak with a representative via the online chat regarding the significant increase she said that she was unable to process any sort of credit to the account regardless of what I had been told at a local Verizon store where I purchased the tablet.
As a result of all of these mishaps since arriving here in Alaska I determined I was in need of newer devices that utilize the 4G LTE network currently provided by Verizon in Alaska. I know for a fact that the 4G LTE works great up here because my Nexus 7 tablet runs flawlessly and does not incur roaming charges when utilizing the 4G LTE network.
Yesterday I attempted to contact Verizon through the live chat feature regarding upgrading two of the devices on my account. The live chat representative immediately asked me when my upgrade date was. Upon telling her my upgrade date 9/29/2014 she told me I should contact the customer service department as I might be eligible for an early upgrade. I then proceeded to contact the customer service department using my Iphone 4.
My attempt to speak to anyone in the customer service department resulted in a merry-go-round of being put on hold 6 separate times by two different employees, both of which had me wait for more than an hour while they attempted to speak to a manager to gain approval for an early upgrade. The first rep seemed almost sure she would be able to have my devices upgraded early especially considering the issues I was having regarding service.
The second rep seemed newer and was very dodgy about my questions and was very unwilling to help at first. He even mentioned that I had been a Verizon customer for almost two years, had never missed a single payment and had outstanding account history which should have garnered some sort of importance to the level of my request. But I digress, during this time I was disconnected from the call twice from each separate representative.
Both reps assured me they would call me back, I never did get a call back from either one of those reps and I was becoming very frustrated having waited four hours trying to find some sort of solution to my current predicament.
After waiting an hour for the second representative to call back I grew impatient and contacted the customer service department, was put on hold again, and finally reached a third customer service representative who was able to provide a solution for me.
I explained everything I had been dealing with to Cory ID # V0PAC61, both regarding the phones, the issue of the level of service I was receiving, the dire need for working devices and the multiple times I had been disconnected. I explained to him as a result of these issues I was certainly considering switching to a different provider, a local provider even who could provide me the adequate service that I require for my mobile devices.
I explained to Cory that I had been with Verizon for almost two years, and I had been on a relatives account prior to owning my own Verizon account and had never received this kind of treatment when trying to work towards a simple solution. Cory proceeded to tell me he needed to put me on hold to see if there was anything that could be done regarding the upgrades of the device considering all of the trouble I had been dealing with.
After Cory reconnected with me in the phone call he was able to successfully reach a solution by allowing me to upgrade my devices. We conversed about the options available and I eventually decided to upgrade both Iphone 4 devices to Moto X devices as we determined those would be sufficient for my needs while in Alaska. I also proceeded to add two Otter Box Defender cases to the order so that the devices would have sufficient protection. Cory inquired as to whether or not I would like to purchase insurance for the phones as well and I opted for the $5.00 monthly insurance which including damage and water protection.
Cory explained to me the grand total for the devices which included an activation fee of $35.00 for each device, $49.99 for each Otter Box case, and an additional $50.00 for each device which would be refunded as a rebate upon receipt of the devices and activation, a rebate that I would be required to submit. Cory explained to me that the devices would most likely arrive Tuesday of 6/17 and no later than Wednesday 6/18.
Cory took my shipping information and told me everything was all set and the only thing left to do was to transfer me to the automated service so that I could accept the 2 year agreement for both devices. I thanked him very much, took his name and ID# so that I might leave positive feedback about his exemplary customer service and was then transferred to the automated service.
Once transferred to the automated service I was then prompted to enter both telephone numbers for the devices that would be upgraded, I was then required to accept the new 2 year agreement for both devices and after doing so I was required to end the call. I did so in an orderly fashion and expected a confirmation # to arrive in my email regarding the placed order.
I have never received a confirmation email. I decided to sleep on it and assumed a confirmation email would be sent sometime tomorrow. Nothing has since been received however. I woke up early this morning around 6AM Alaska time to speak to another live chat representative, Bryan, in the billing department who assured me the order was currently processing and verified the order #. I asked him whether or not it was typical for a customer to not receive a confirmation email for an order placed and he said it can sometimes take up to 2-3 business days. He then stated that he had taken note of the issues I was experiencing and told me he would transfer me to the sales department as they would be able to provide more information regarding the shipment of both devices and a confirmation email, as he stated he did not want me to have to wait any longer than necessary to receive said devices.
I was then transferred to Devon in the sales department via the live chat service where I was then required to repeat everything I had said to both Bryan and the other representatives I had spoken too. After a lengthy discussion and repeating everything I have just wrote he told me the order was indeed processing and that he would send a confirmation email in the next 30 minutes.
That was 2 hours ago. It is now 8am Alaska time and I still have not received a confirmation email regarding my order. I was sent an email by Verizon an hour ago stating I had a device to "discover". The email contained no information regarding the shipment of my device, the order confirmation number, or anything regarding my account. The email I received was a typical spam email asking an individual to check out the current available phones and sign up for a new contract.
All I want is a confirmation email to assure that the devices are being sent. I need my phone for work and to communicate with my family in the lower 48. I desperately need to make sure that the device is in fact being sent to the proper address, this is why a confirmation email of the order is so important. I do not care about the shipping speed I just want what I ask to be taken care of for a change. I would hate to sit here unable to determine what the status of my devices are only for the order to be stuck in "processing" limbo and be unable to receive the devices when I was told they would be sent.
I feel I have been given the run around treatment way more than is typically given with any company when an individual is trying to work towards a solution. I have been patient and cordial with everyone I have spoken with, I have not raised my voice or shown stress or anger towards the situation I have only tried my best to work towards a solution with anyone I have spoken too but I am becoming increasingly frustrated with this situation.
Any help regarding this matter would be greatly appreciated. This situation has left a sour taste in my mouth and if the devices were indeed not actually processed in an order, or they were not shipped correctly, or in fact if the order had never existed at all it will only deter me from keeping my Verizon account active and affect my decision to switch to another provider.

Hello APVzW, we absolutely want the best path to resolution. My apologies for multiple attempts of replacing the device. We'd like to verify the order information and see if we can locate the tracking number. Please send a direct message with the order number so we can dive deeper. Here's steps to send a direct message: http://vz.to/1b8XnPy We look forward to hearing from you soon.
WiltonA_VZW
VZW Support
Follow us on twitter @VZWSupport

Have an issue regarding library books. My ereader is validated with Kobo account and Adobe Digital Editions account, but I get an error: 'this document is protected bij DRM and isn't available with your Adobe ID'.

Have an issue regarding library books. My ereader is validated with Kobo account and Adobe Digital Editions account, but I get an error: 'this document is protected bij DRM and isn't available with your Adobe ID'.

same problem for me. I am using abe edition 3 as I don't think 4 can be used with kobo. Book has been downloaded to kobo but it can't be read as it is not authorised.Help please

Payroll issue regarding the Claims - /561 and /563

Hi Payroll Experts,
I have a payroll issue regarding the Claims - /561 and /563 (October PY Run)
When i m runnning the Current month Payroll(October PY Run), Total Earning - total deductions are not matching with Net Pay. later i came to know that the system creates the WT /561 and deducts from the Net Pay.
But as per the Employee Payment Details , there is no recovery required from the employee for the past one year. But even then the system creates the WT /561. and deducts the same from NET Pay.
The followng are the WT details
IN - Period
OCT 2011
     /101 Total gross amount     118,897.00
     /110 Net payments/deductions     76,070.00-
     /550 Statutory net pay     95343
     /551 Stat.net recalc.diff.     37,692.00-
     /552 Stat.net subs.adjustment      37,692.00-
     /559 Bank transfer                                                   34,317.00
     /560 Net pay     37,218.00
     /563 Claim from previous month     5,609.00
FOR Period
Sept- Oct
     /101 Total gross amount     49,213.00
     /110 Net payments/deductions      31,721.00-
     /550 Statutory net pay     41,529.00
     /551 Stat.net recalc.diff.     14,591.00
     /552 Stat.net subs.adjustment     23,101.00-
     /553 Recalc.diff.to last payr.     37,692.00
     /559 Bank transfer                                                   14,591.00
     /560 Net pay     14,591.00
     /561 Claim     5,609.00
I request some body to throw siome light on the same.

Hi Experts,
Thanks for everyone for replying to my query ,
I have a doubt that If you check the WTs /551 and /552 in the IN PRD, the negative sign is coming for both the WTs
Is it correct?
And also, Assume that there may be a master data changes like Bank details and other deduction Wts happened in the month of Aug and now i m going to run the payroll for the month of Nov,
some of the employees having differences in the Net Pay, Eventhough the employee is having sufficient balances.
So how do i handle this issue
IS ther any way to solve this differences?
Please Let me know how to solve this issue.
Thanks

Issues regarding theMarker value in inventory BI 7.0

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for