Issues with using Outer join in Data Template

Hi all,
this is my data in two tables .
Table Ronny1
colA colB
1 u
2 v
3 x
Table Ronny2
colC colD
1 q
2 r
This is my data template
<dataTemplate name="MGF" dataSourceRef="Source1">
     <dataQuery>
          <sqlStatement name="Q1" dataSourceRef="Source1">
               <![CDATA[select C, D  from Ronny2]]>
          </sqlStatement>
          <sqlStatement name="Q2" dataSourceRef="Source2">
               <![CDATA[select A , B from lokesh1 where A = :C]]>
          </sqlStatement>
     </dataQuery>
     <dataStructure>
          <group name="G1" source="Q1">
               <group name="G2" source="Q2">
                    <element name="A" value="A"/>
                    <element name="B" value="B"/>
               </group>
          </group>
     </dataStructure>
</dataTemplate>
Now this would give me result as
A B
1 u
2 v
however my requirement is this
A B
1 u
2 v
3 x
that is, i want to display all the rows of table Ronny1 and matching rows from table Ronny2. I tried modifiying my second sql as
<![CDATA[select A , B from lokesh1 where A = :C (+)]]> ( using a outer join)
but this does give me correct data and comes back with the cartesion product.
Can anyone please answer this for me that how can we use the outer join in data templaes.
Thanks
Ronny

hey vetsrini,
sorry for the confusion here,
actually i want to display all the rows from table Ronny1 and i am also pulling in the matching rows from table Ronny2 and my data structure looks as ( pulling in column D from table Ronny2)
<dataStructure>
<group name="G1" source="Q1">
<group name="G2" source="Q2">
<element name="A" value="A"/>
<element name="B" value="B"/>
<element name="D" value="D"/>
</group>
</group>
</dataStructure>
and this is what i want the output to be
A B D
1 u q
2 v r
3 x
Hence the row where A <> C the data in the D column will be null, same as in the case of outer join.
any suggestions
Thx
Ronny

Similar Messages

  • Performance issue with using out parameter sys_refcursor

    Hello,
    I'm using Oracle 10g, with ODP.Net in a C# application.
    I'm using about 10 stored procedures, each having one out parameter of sys_refcursor type. when I use one function in C# and call these 10 sp's, it takes about 78ms to excute the function.
    Now to improve the performance, I created one SP with 10 output parameters of sys_refcursor type. and i just call this one sp. the time taken has increased , not it takes abt 95ms.
    is this the right approach or how can we improve the performance by using sys_refcursor.
    please suggest, it is urgent, i'm stuck up with this issue.
    thanks
    shruti

    With 78ms and 95ms are you talking about milliseconds or minutes? If it's milliseconds then what's the problem and does it really matter if there is a difference of 17 milliseconds as that could just be caused by network traffic or something. If you're talking minutes, then we would need more information about what you are attempting to do, what tables and processing is going on, what indexes you have etc.
    Query optimisation tips can be found on this thread.. When your query takes too long ....
    Without more information we can't really tell what's happening.

  • Sample code and senarios to use outer join?

    We know the ABAP4 syntax for inner join, but never tried outer join and we even don't know if there is any outer join syntax in ABAP4 or not.  Would be very appreciated if some ABAP expert here let us know if there is any outer join and list the difference between inner join and outer join with detailed senarios or when we would use outer join or when to use inner join?  Also give a sample code on the outer join if there is any in ABAP?
    Thanks and we will give you reward points!

    Hye..
    Left outer join between table 1 and table 2 where column D in both tables set the join condition:
    Table 1                      Table 2
    A
    B
    C
    D
    D
    E
    F
    G
    H
    a1
    b1
    c1
    1
    1
    e1
    f1
    g1
    h1
    a2
    b2
    c2
    1
    3
    e2
    f2
    g2
    h2
    a3
    b3
    c3
    2
    4
    e3
    f3
    g3
    h3
    a4
    b4
    c4
    3
    |--|||--|
        Left Outer Join
        |--||||||||--|
        | A  | B  | C  | D  | D  | E  | F  | G  | H  |
        |--||||||||--|
        | a1 | b1 | c1 | 1  | 1  | e1 | f1 | g1 | h1 |
        | a2 | b2 | c2 | 1  | 1  | e1 | f1 | g1 | h1 |
        | a3 | b3 | c3 | 2  |NULL|NULL|NULL|NULL|NULL|
        | a4 | b4 | c4 | 3  | 3  | e2 | f2 | g2 | h2 |
        |--||||||||--|
    Example
    Output a list of all custimers with their bookings for October 15th, 2001:
    DATA: CUSTOMER TYPE SCUSTOM,
          BOOKING  TYPE SBOOK.
    SELECT SCUSTOMNAME SCUSTOMPOSTCODE SCUSTOM~CITY
           SBOOKFLDATE SBOOKCARRID SBOOKCONNID SBOOKBOOKID
           INTO (CUSTOMER-NAME, CUSTOMER-POSTCODE, CUSTOMER-CITY,
                 BOOKING-FLDATE, BOOKING-CARRID, BOOKING-CONNID,
                 BOOKING-BOOKID)
           FROM SCUSTOM LEFT OUTER JOIN SBOOK
             ON SCUSTOMID = SBOOKCUSTOMID AND
                SBOOK~FLDATE = '20011015'
           ORDER BY SCUSTOMNAME SBOOKFLDATE.
      WRITE: / CUSTOMER-NAME, CUSTOMER-POSTCODE, CUSTOMER-CITY,
               BOOKING-FLDATE, BOOKING-CARRID, BOOKING-CONNID,
               BOOKING-BOOKID.
    ENDSELECT.
    Reward if helpful.
    Thanks.
    Imran.

  • Update Statement with left outer join

    hi,
    i have to update a column in table "a" from table "b" and both of them joined with left outer join
    How can I do this
    Thanks in Advance

    Please consider the following when you post a question. This would help us help you better
    1. New features keep coming in every oracle version so please provide Your Oracle DB Version to get the best possible answer.
    You can use the following query and do a copy past of the output.
    select * from v$version 2. This forum has a very good Search Feature. Please use that before posting your question. Because for most of the questions
    that are asked the answer is already there.
    3. We dont know your DB structure or How your Data is. So you need to let us know. The best way would be to give some sample data like this.
    I have the following table called sales
    with sales
    as
          select 1 sales_id, 1 prod_id, 1001 inv_num, 120 qty from dual
          union all
          select 2 sales_id, 1 prod_id, 1002 inv_num, 25 qty from dual
    select *
      from sales 4. Rather than telling what you want in words its more easier when you give your expected output.
    For example in the above sales table, I want to know the total quantity and number of invoice for each product.
    The output should look like this
    Prod_id   sum_qty   count_inv
    1         145       2 5. When ever you get an error message post the entire error message. With the Error Number, The message and the Line number.
    6. Next thing is a very important thing to remember. Please post only well formatted code. Unformatted code is very hard to read.
    Your code format gets lost when you post it in the Oracle Forum. So in order to preserve it you need to
    use the {noformat}{noformat} tags.
    The usage of the tag is like this.
    <place your code here>\
    7. If you are posting a *Performance Related Question*. Please read
       {thread:id=501834} and {thread:id=863295}.
       Following those guide will be very helpful.
    8. Please keep in mind that this is a public forum. Here No question is URGENT.
       So use of words like *URGENT* or *ASAP* (As Soon As Possible) are considered to be rude.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

  • How to use outer join condition in my below query.

    Hi All,
    How to use outer join condition in my below query.
    In the table  APPS_JP.GEDIS_OFFER_HEADER goh I have more records
    in the table APPS_JP.GEDIS_ORDER_BUILDS gob I have less number of records.
    I want all the records from APPS_JP.GEDIS_OFFER_HEADER goh
    including other conditions.
    I have tried goh.OFFER_NO=gob.OFFER_NO(+) but same result.
    [code]SELECT   GOH.ORIG_SYSTEM,
               gsp.USER_NAME,
               goh.ORDER_NO,
               goh.OMEGA_ORDER_NUMBER,
               goh.ORDER_TYPE,
               gc.CUSTOMER_ID,
               gc.OMEGA_CUSTOMER_NUMBER,
               CASE WHEN gc.PRIVATE = 'N' THEN gc.CUSTOMER_NAME ELSE '' END
                  AS COMPANY_NAME,
               goh.ORDER_STATUS,
               goh.TOTAL_SELLING_PRICE,
               goh.TOTAL_MARGIN,
                  ga1.ADDRESS1
               || ','
               || ga1.ADDRESS2
               || ','
               || ga1.ADDRESS3
               || ','
               || ga1.POSTAL_CODE
               || ','
               || ga1.CITY
                  AS SHIPPING_ADDRESS,
                  ga2.ADDRESS1
               || ','
               || ga2.ADDRESS2
               || ','
               || ga2.ADDRESS3
               || ','
               || ga2.POSTAL_CODE
               || ','
               || ga2.CITY
                  AS BILLING_ADDRESS,
               ga.ADDRESS_ID,
               gol.DESCRIPTION,
               APPS_JP.TZ.to_local_date (goh.OFFER_DATE, goh.OFFER_DATE_UTC)
                  AS OFFER_DATE,
               gc.LEVEL_8,
               goh.NO_OF_BUILDS,
               gob.SFDC_ID,
               goh.PURCHASE_ORDER_NO AS PO,
               gc1.CUSTOMER_NAME AS END_USAGE,
               gol.LOB,
               goh.TOTAL_MARGIN_PCT,
               goh.TOTAL_DISCOUNT,
               goh.TOTAL_DISCOUNT_PCT
        FROM   APPS_JP.GEDIS_OFFER_HEADER goh,
               APPS_JP.GEDIS_ORDER_BUILDS gob,
               APPS_JP.GEDIS_ORDER_LINES gol,
               APPS_JP.GEDIS_OFFER_RELATED_CUSTOMER gorc,
               APPS_JP.GEDIS_OFFER_RELATED_CUSTOMER ship,
               APPS_JP.GEDIS_OFFER_RELATED_CUSTOMER bill,
               APPS_JP.GEDIS_CUSTOMER gc,
               APPS_JP.GEDIS_CUSTOMER gc1,
               APPS_JP.GEDIS_CONTACT gct,
               APPS_JP.GEDIS_ADDRESS ga,
               APPS_JP.GEDIS_ADDRESS_NORM ga1,
               APPS_JP.GEDIS_ADDRESS_NORM ga2,
               (SELECT   DISTINCT SALESPERSON_ID, USER_NAME
                  FROM   APPS_JP.GEDIS_SALESPERSON
                 WHERE   SALESPERSON_ID IN
                               (SELECT   TO_NUMBER (COLUMN_VALUE) AS SALESPERSON_ID
                                  FROM   TABLE (APPS_GLOBAL.SplitString ('337309'))))
               gsp
       WHERE       goh.ORDER_NO <> 0
               AND goh.OFFER_NO <> 0
               AND goh.OFFER_NO=gol.OFFER_NO
               AND gol.BUILD_NO = 1
               AND gol.LINE_NO = 1
               AND goh.OFFER_NO=gob.OFFER_NO
               AND gob.BUILD_NO = 1
               AND goh.OFFER_NO = gorc.OFFER_NO
               AND gct.CONTACT_ID = gorc.CONTACT_ID
               AND ga.CUSTOMER_ID = gc.CUSTOMER_ID
               AND ga.PRIMARY = 'Y'
               AND goh.LEAD_SALESPERSON=gsp.SALESPERSON_ID
               AND goh.OFFER_NO = ship.OFFER_NO
               AND ship.RELATION_TYPE = 'SHIP'
               AND ga1.ADDRESS_ID = ship.ADDRESS_ID
               AND ga1.CUSTOMER_ID = gc1.CUSTOMER_ID
               AND goh.OFFER_NO = bill.OFFER_NO
               AND bill.RELATION_TYPE = 'BILL'
               AND ga2.ADDRESS_ID = bill.ADDRESS_ID
               AND goh.OFFER_DATE BETWEEN APPS_JP.TZ.LOCAL_TO_DB_DATE (
                                             SYSDATE - 30
                                      AND  APPS_JP.TZ.LOCAL_TO_DB_DATE (SYSDATE)
               AND gorc.RELATION_TYPE = 'BASE'
               AND gorc.CUSTOMER_ID = gc.CUSTOMER_ID
               AND goh.SALES_CHANNEL = gc.SALES_CHANNEL
               AND gc.SALES_CHANNEL = 'SMB'
               AND goh.LEAD_SALESPERSON IN (goh.CREATED_BY, goh.LEAD_SALESPERSON)
    ORDER BY   goh.OFFER_NO;[/code]
    Please help me how to use this outer join condition.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    If you want all the rows from goh, then you don't want any conditions like  goh.OFFER_NO <> 0.
    Make all the joins to goh outer joins, and make all conditions that apply to any tables joined to goh (or to tables joined to them) part of the join condition, like this:
    FROM             APPS_JP.GEDIS_OFFER_HEADER     goh
    LEFT OUTER JOIN  APPS_JP.GEDIS_ORDER_BUILDS     gob  ON   gob.OFFER_NO = goh.OFFER_NO
                                                         AND  gob.BUILD_NO = 1
    LEFT OUTER JOIN  APPS_JP.GEDIS_ORDER_LINES      gol  ON   gol.OFFER_NO = goh.OFFER_NO
                                                         AND  gol.BUILD_NO = 1
                                                         AND  gol.LINE_NO  = 1
    LEFT OUTER JOIN  APPS_JP.GEDIS_OFFER_RELATED_CUSTOMER
                                                    gorc ...
    I hope this answers your question.
    If not, post a little sample data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements, relevant columns only) for all the tables involved, and the results you want from that data.
    Simplify the problem as much as possible.  For example, do you really need all those tables to show what the problem is?  Of course, you need them in tyour real query, but if you understand a solution that only involves 4 or 5 tables, you'll know how to apply it to any number of tables.
    Explain, using specific examples, how you get those results from that data.Always say what version of Oracle you're using (e.g. 11.2.0.2.0).
    See the forum FAQ https://forums.oracle.com/message/9362002#9362002

  • Help Required with an OUTER JOIN Query

    Hi,
    I need a list of records carrying UserID and ALL SectionIDs and SectionTitles he/she is associated
    with so I created following query:
    SELECT UsersSections.UserID, Sections.SectionID, Sections.SectionTitle
    FROM UsersSections, Sections
    WHERE UsersSections.SectionID(+) = Sections.SectionID AND UsersSections.UserID = 1
    Where my tables are:
    - UsersSections (UserID, SectionID)
    - Sections (SectionID, SectionTitle)
    The problem is that if I exclude WHERE UserID = '1' clause the query return the desired result i.e. ALL Sections
    And ALL Users associated with the any Section(s). But I need results for a particular UserID but
    Including WHERE UserID = '1' clause only return records for that User only not the sections he/she belongs to which was the purpose of using OUTER JOIN.
    Any help will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks.
    AKG

    userssections.userid (+) = 1

  • Granting SELECT to user on VIEW with FULL OUTER JOIN fails?

    I have a quandary.
    Using Oracle 9i, I have created a simple view. When I perform a count on it, rows are returned.
    However, when I grant SELECT access to another user, they can't see the VIEW. The VIEW has a FULL OUTER JOIN operation in it.
    When I do the same thing using a regular join, it works.
    Any ideas why, please?
    SQL> conn ifsinfo/******@DB
    Connected.
    SQL> ed
    Wrote file afiedt.buf
      1  create view mctest3 as
      2  select
      3   vc.idcus ,
      4   ci.customer_id
      5  from
      6   ifsapp.vmo_company vc
      7  full outer join
      8   ifsapp.customer_info ci
      9  on
    10*  vc.custno = ci.customer_id
    SQL> /
    View created.
    SQL> select count(*) from mctest3;
      COUNT(*)
         73994
    SQL> GRANT SELECT ON MCTEST3 TO IFSAPP WITH GRANT OPTION;
    Grant succeeded.
    SQL> CONN IFSAPP/******@DB
    Connected.
    SQL> select count(*) from IFSINFO.MCTEST3;
    select count(*) from IFSINFO.MCTEST3
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-00942: table or view does not existbut with regular join:
    SQL> conn ifsinfo/******@DB
    Connected.
    SQL> create view mctest4 as
      2    select
      3     vc.idcus ,
      4     ci.customer_id
      5    from
      6     ifsapp.vmo_company vc, ifsapp.customer_info ci
      7    where vc.custno = ci.customer_id;
    View created.
    SQL> select count(*) from mctest4;
      COUNT(*)
         44269
    SQL> GRANT SELECT ON MCTEST4 TO IFSAPP WITH GRANT OPTION;
    Grant succeeded.
    SQL> conn ifsapp/******@DB
    Connected.
    SQL> select count(*) from IFSINFO.MCTEST4;
      COUNT(*)
         44269

    Hi,
    >>SQL> conn ifsinfo/******@DB
    Connected.
    SQL> ed
    Wrote file afiedt.buf
    1 create view mctest3 as
    2 select
    3 vc.idcus ,
    4 ci.customer_id
    5 from
    6 ifsapp.vmo_company vc
    7 full outer join
    8 ifsapp.customer_info ci
    9 on
    10* vc.custno = ci.customer_id
    SQL> /
    According to Note:244315.1, it is not possible to make a FULL OUTER JOIN on views owned by another user at the 9i version of Oracle. As above, do not use FULL OUTER JOIN on views owned by another user. Try to use outer join operator (+), and/or UNIONS instead.
    Cheers

  • Performance issue with using buffering in a APPL0 or APPL1 Table

    Hi,
    Can anyone please tell me whether there's any serious performace issue with using buffering for a Master or Transaction table? I'm asking this because when I run code inspector for my transp table I'm getting information message:
    Message Code 0011 ==> Buffereing is Activated but Delivery Class Is "A" and Message Code 0014 ==> Buffereing is Activated but Data Class Is "APPL1".
    So what's other way round for improving performance.
    Thanks,
    Mahesh M.S.

    Hi,
    have you read the documentation?
    Let me paste it here for you:
    Buffering is switched on for the examined table and it has data type 'APPL0' or 'APPL1'.
    Tables with data type 'APPL0' or 'APPL1' should contain master or transaction data, so these tables should either contain a large amount of data or their content should change frequently. Therefore buffering the table is unfavourable. Very large tables suppress other tables in the buffer memory and hence slow done any access to them. Transaction data should not be buffered because the synchronization of the changes on the various application servers is very time consuming.
    In exceptional cases, small master data tables ('APPL0', size category 0) can be buffered.
    The solution depends on the table content. If it is master or transaction data, the table should not be buffered. If the table content does not consist of master or transaction data, the data type should be corrected accordingly.
    This should answer your questions...
    Kind regards,
    Hermann

  • Dont want to use outer joins

    Hi Guys,
    I have some data in lookup tables and in the main tables the foreign keys are nullable. For this I have to use outer join query. But as it matters on performance because I am using 100's of tables like this and its making the query really slow. Is there any other way to get rid of outer join and get the same result??
    Thanks in advance.
    Ghulam Mustafa Butt

    First, why "avoid outer joins at all costs"? If you need the functionality of an outer join, using an outer join is the best option.
    Second, I don't see where 161992's code does anything other than an inner join in a slighly more convoluted form.
    Justin
    Distributed Database Consulting, Inc.
    http://www.ddbcinc.com/askDDBC

  • How to have a condition with the outer join

    Hi, I'd like to know if, inside a report, there's a way to create a condition which include in some way an outer join.
    So, I have 2 custom folders:
    Tickets with 2 fields: Ticket_id, Inventory_item_id, category_id and iptv_sumptom
    Hierarchy with 4 fields: Symptom, Inv_item_id, Category_id and Group
    These 2 folders are joined in this way
    Tickets.inventory_item_id = Hierarchy.inv_item_id (+) AND Tickets.category_id = Hierarchy.category_id (+) AND Tickets.iptv_sumptom = Hierarchy.Symptom (+)
    Now, from the report I have a parameter based on the field Group to restrict dataset of the tickets.
    ...but when I choose a group and I run the report, the conditions inside the plsql query generated is like this
    WHERE (Tickets.inventory_item_id = Hierarchy.inv_item_id (+) AND Tickets.category_id = Hierarchy.category_id (+) AND Tickets.iptv_sumptom = Hierarchy.Symptom (+)) AND Hierarchy.Group = 'A'
    where the last condition is WITHOUT outer join !
    I need to have also the outer join on the Hierarchy.Group: AND Hierarchy.Group (+) = 'A', but from the Administrator I don't want to add another join with (+) for the Group. From Plus I didn't find any way to write (+).....
    Anybody knows another method or workaround to have also a filter (the condition Hierarchy.Group = 'A') with an outer join ?
    Thanks in advance
    Alex

    Hi,
    A workaround can be either use new objects or modify the existing ones to avoid the outer join.
    In order to do that you can add a dummy record to each custom folder and then join by it.
    For example if you will add to the
    Tickets will be:
    select Ticket_id, Inventory_item_id, category_id, iptv_sumptom
    from......
    union all
    select -1,-1,-1,'Some value' from dual
    And hierarchy will be:
    select Symptom, Inv_item_id, Category_id ,Group
    from......
    union all
    select 'Some value',-1,-1,'Some value' from dual
    Now you can create a full join between them without the need to outer join.
    Hope it will help
    Tamir

  • SQL for View Definition using outer join

    Hello everyone,
    I am creating a view using the statement below
    SELECT *
    FROM table_a A
    ,table_b B
    ,table_c C
    WHERE A.sg_code = B.sg_code and
    B.st_code = 'E' and
    A.sg_code = C.sg_code(+) and
    C.st_code = 'T'
    The structure of the view is as follows
    View
    sg_code| Name | start_date | end_date |
    1 | Test |13-03-2008 | NULL |
    Table_a
    sg_code,Name
    Table_b
    sg_code,st_code,actual_date
    the view can have a null for the column 'end_date'
    This means there will not be a record inserted in the Table_b for end_date=null, there will only be a record for actual_date=start_date
    In this scenario when I query the view I am not seeing the newly created record just because there is a condition "C.st_code = 'T'" with the outer join on the sg_code.
    When I look into the individual tables I see the records.
    Table A
    Pg_code,Name
    1 Test
    Table B
    Id pg_code As_of_date
    1 1 13-03-2008
    How should I modify my view definition so that I can query the view even if there is a null for 'end_date'
    Thanks
    fm

    the last line should be:
    C.st_code(+) = 'T'
    by failing to include the (+) on that line, you made it NOT an outer join. an outer joined table must be outer joined on every where criteria, including to constants.

  • Any issues with using LDAP on LINUX for GRC 5.2 UME?

    Our company is converting our LDAP servers from AIX to LINUX.  The DNS name used in our UME connection should not change.  Are there any issues with using LDAP on LINUX?  We are currently on GRC 5.2 SP9 (in the middle of upgrading to SP12).
    Also, I have been trying to connect our test UME system to a test LDAP box that has already been converted to LINUX but keep getting a 'connection failed' error when I try to test it. 
    Do you have to reboot the server to test changing the LDAP connections?  I've been trying it by going into UME, pulling up the LDAP tab, hitting the Modify button, entering the new userid and password for test LDAP, and hitting the Test Connection button.  I've verified that this userid and password is correct for test LDAP.
    Is there a way to get more information about why the connection failed?
    Thanks.

    I've been told by our LDAP Support group that none of the other configuration settings should have to be changed.  I should only have to change the id and password to connect to a test version of LDAP instead of our regular connection to the production LDAP.
    Can you test a connection for a different userid/password without having to reboot/restart the server?  Do I need to change these two settings, save then, reboot/restart, and then do the Test Connection button?
    Thanks.

  • Issues with using relative links in Captivate 8

    Is anyone else having issues with using relative links in Captivate 8?  These links all used to work in the previous version of Captivate. And I could have sworn this was fixed already once in Captivate 8 but it's popping up again for us. Here is the situation... We have courses that are made up of multiple lessons which as separate Captivate files. Within those lessons are buttons to link to external documents (which live in a shared document folder), demonstrations, etc.  We use relative links because we post these to our amazon servers and we also sell them to clients where they can post them on their own web servers or in their LMS.  SO we can't put in full paths for the links or we'd have to change them constantly.  So an example is that the link for a button might be "../Document/nameofdoc.pdf"  This would be going to a user guide or something that is posted in the "Document" folder that lives at the same level as the lesson's folder. But now, all of the sudden, none of our bazillion links is working. And I've tried buttons, hyperlinks, and even the old click box. Nothing works with relative links. And I did check the permissions on every file and folder on our Amazon server to verify nothing changed there as well.   Any suggestions?

    I have the same issue with relative links using Captivate 8.  I am trying to load Captivate modules into an LMS using relative links to document files within the LMS.  The links work fine during a site page test so not an issue in the LMS, but from the Captivate module they aren't working....
    Help?

  • Issues with using the output redirection character with newer NXOS versions?

    Has anyone seen any issues with using the output redirection character with newer NXOS versions?
    Am receiving "Error 0x40870004 while copying."
    Simply copying a file from bootflash to tftp is ok.
    This occurs for both 3CDaemon and Tftpd32 softwares.
    Have tried it on multiple switches - same issue.
    Any known bugs?
    thanks!
    The following is an example of bad (NXOS4.1.1b) and good (SANOS3.2.1a)
    MDS2# sho ver | inc system
      system:    version 4.1(1b)
      system image file is:    bootflash:///m9200-s2ek9-mz.4.1.1b.bin
      system compile time:     10/7/2008 13:00:00 [10/11/2008 09:52:55]
    MDS2# sh int br > tftp://10.73.54.194
    Trying to connect to tftp server......
    Connection to server Established. Copying Started.....
    TFTP put operation failed:Access violation
    Error 0x40870004 while copying tftp://10.73.54.194/
    MDS2# copy bootflash:cpu_logfile tftp://10.73.54.194
    Trying to connect to tftp server......
    Connection to server Established. Copying Started.....
    |
    TFTP put operation was successful
    MDS2#
    ck-ci9216-001# sho ver | inc system
      system:    version 3.2(1a)
      system image file is:    bootflash:/m9200-ek9-mz.3.2.1a.bin
      system compile time:     9/25/2007 18:00:00 [10/06/2007 06:46:51]
    ck-ci9216-001# sh int br > tftp://10.73.54.194
    Trying to connect to tftp server......
    |
    TFTP put operation was successful

    Please check with new version of TFTPD 32 server. The error may be due to older version of TFPT server, the new version available solved this error. Files are getting uploaded with no issues.
    1. Download tftpd32b.zip from:
    http://tftpd32.jounin.net/tftpd32_download.html
    2. Copy the tftpd32b.zip file into an empty directory and extract it.
    3. Copy the file you want to transver into the directory containing tftpd32.exe.
    4. Run tftpd32.exe from that directory. The "Base Directory" field should show the path to the directory containing the file you want to transfer.
    At this point, the tftpserver is ready to begin serving files. As devices request files, the main tftpd32 window will log the requests.
    Best Regards...

  • HR ABAP: Issue with using 'nocommit' parameter on FM HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION

    Issue with using nocommit parameter on FM HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION:
    My client has a requirement to create the following 4 infotypes in sequence in a LUW, i.e either all are created or none is created.
    9045   (custom infotype)
    0045
    0078
    0015
    I tried to use the nocommit parameter on FM HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION to insert the 4 infotypes
    in a nocoomit mode and then at the end I have issued
    'Commit Work', but to my surprise only I/T 0015 is created in the database and the first three (9045, 0045 and 0078) did not make it to database.
    I searched many threads on SDN but could not find a solution.
    Please let me know if there could be any solution to implement the LUW.
    YOur inputs will be appreciated.

    Hi ,
    i think u can also try with this FM HR_MAINTAIN_MASTERDATA , see its documentations.
    no commit works like a simulation mode , what u can do is  ,
    call FM for all Infotypes and collect all error msgs if any , then finally call FM for all infotypes again without passing nocommit work ( i.e space).
    regards
    prabhu

Maybe you are looking for