Item Level Validation Not Working As Supposed To...

Hi All,
I have an item validation type: SQL(Not Exist) that checks whether the value in the id number field exists in the database when Create button is clicked. If the id number exists in the database then an error message is displayed in line with the field & the transaction doesn't go through; however, when this happens Apply Changes & Delete button appear & Create button dissapear. It's as if the record has already been inserted. I would like this validation to work like the Not Null validations.
I repeated this process several times without success & now I can't even create a new user or update & delete existing ones - I get the error:
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7: PLS-00428: an INTO clause is expected in this SELECT statement
ORA-2015: User ID number already exists in the database.NB:The second message is the one I use whenever there's duplicates so, it's oracle reserved message. Any help is highly appreciated.

The buttons probably have conditions to appear if a certain item is not null. You can set this item to null as part of the validation, e.g.,
:P1_X := null;
...but to do that you'd need to change the validation type to PL/SQL Function Returning Boolean and code the "not exists" logic into the PL/SQL block.

Similar Messages

  • Item level security not working when placed in a portlet page

    I have three page links linking to separate pages and have two of them with item level security turned on for specific groups with view privilges. I have the access for those groups with view privilges in the page level as well. I have published that as portlet and placed the portlet in another page which has view priviliges for the groups specified in item level as well.
    But I notice that when i place the portlet in a page, the item level security is not working.
    Item Level Security Not Working for Items Placed on a page and published as portlet and placed in another page. Is there some work around for this.

    Would you please clarify for me? Is the problem that unauthorized people can see the portlet, or that unauthorized people can see the links?

  • Item Level Security not working with Tabs

    I've Portal
    This issue is with Item Level Security with Tabs. Here is what I've have:
    Page Group: MyPagegroup (Privs: portal => Manage All)
    Page: MyTestPage (Privs: portal => Manage All,
    testUser => View)
    There is a tab called MyTab on page MyTestPage which has two items (simple images) image1 and image2. The tab's access privs have been set NOT to inherit from the page. The public check box has not been checked for the tab. I've specifically assigned access privs to the tab.
    Now here are the two scenarios that I'm having problem with:
    1) MyTab (portal => Manage All, testUser => view)
    image1 (ILS enabled: portal => Manage All)
    image2 (ILS enabled: portal => Manage All,
    testUser => View)
    When logged in as "testUser", I still see both the images on MyTab although image2 doesn't have view priv to testUser. My expected result is to see just image2 on the tab.
    2) MyTab (portal => Manage All)
    image1 (ILS enabled: portal => Manage All,
    testUser => View)
    image2 (ILS enabled: portal => Manage All)
    When logged in as "testUser", I still see NO images on MyTab although image1 has view privs to testUser. I would expect to see image1 on the tab.
    Question: In both the above cases, the tab privs seem to be dictating what the user sees regardless of what the item level privs are set to. Is this normal behavior or a bug? If a bug, is there a patch? Is there any way so that even after setting the tab privs, I still have finer control of what the user can access through item level privs?
    If I don't put the items under a tab, then things work as expected.
    Lalit Agarwal
    Vienna, VA
    703-521-5200 x3610

    This is a known problem with the 9.0.2 release - fixed in

  • Urgent:Tab and item level access not working

    Hi,I am on portal version.I am trying enable security.I have made 5 groups.Added users to group.Those users have only basic view privileges.
    At my page group level I gave view access to all 5 groups.
    At page level gave view access to all 5 groups and checkmarked enable item level security.
    At tab level on one of tabs I gave view access only 4 groups.
    At item level on one of items I gave view access to only 4 groups.
    Now I log in as one of the users in 5 th group and the tab as well as te item both are visible.
    Is it a bug or am I missing somehting.
    Pls let me know urgently

    You asked:
    But if I do not assign any sort of privileges to my groups consisting of all my users then how will they view the page group also forget abt viewing page and tabs on it.
    If you don't assign view privilege on the page group, then you have to assign view privilege on every page that you want your users to see.
    As you discovered, the tabs and items override the page privilege (a tab or item can be hidden from a user who has view privilege on the page), although your users need a minimum of view privilege on the page to see any content.
    I don't understand your comment about groups - they work fine for managing privileges.
    Note that you can use bulk actions (and List View in to manage privileges for multiple pages. You can also assign privileges to your page template to default the privileges on pages based on the template. And new pages will inherit the privileges of their parent if the page group property "Copy Parent Page Properties When Creating Page" is set.

  • Validation not working during Mass Change of Vendor Line Items

    Hi All,
    I created validation for Reference Key 1 field of Vendor line items, in this validation i used customized user exit.
    Whenever i select multiple line items in FBL1N for mass change & try to put a unauthenticated value system gives error as per Validation only for 1 st item but it not work for subsequent items & put the unauthenticated value in subsequent line items.
    I am not able to understand why Validation is working only for 1st line item during mass change & not for subsequent line items.
    Please provide your suggestions in resolving this issue.

    Hello Sandeep,
    I understand your issue. First check if the changes as per the SAP Note 640908 ( is available in your system.
    Actually, Mass changes call FB02 in background and at this stage Validation gets activated and hence, the control doesn't go back for the next item changes. You can test this by deactivating the Validation and then the mass changes will me fine.
    I hope this explains the behaviour.
    Thanks and regards,
    Suresh Jayanthi.

  • Adding item level validation to a field

    Hi All,
    I am new to Oracle APEX.
    I have a field named semester_code in my page and I want end user to enter only alphanumeric values. I want to create item level validation using regular expressions, but I don't know what expression to write for this purpose.
    Any help will be highly appreciated.

    Go to the validations section of the application builder (for the application you are working on)
    -> add item level validation
    -> select the field that you are trying to validate
    ->item string comparison
    -> select 'Item specified is alphanumeric' from list

  • Item Level Validations on Submit

    Hello guys,
    I would like to use Item level Validations but I have a problem. When I submit the page from a button the Item Level Validations automatically fire, can I not run the item validaitons when a specific button is pressed and not 'on submit'? If so how...
    Thanks in advance

    Hi "user502286",
    in APEX 4.0 you have more control if validations (also the built-in one for required) should automatically fire during submit or not than in previous APEX versions. It's all about the two new settings
    -) "Execute Validations" which is available in the "Action When Button Clicked" section of a button and
    -) "Always Execute" for validations
    Please consult the field level help for this attribute to find out how they should be set.
    Hope that helps
    My Blog:
    APEX 4.0 Plug-Ins:

  • Delivery address at Item Level and not at the Header Level

    Hello Experts,
    We are facing an issue as described below:-
    We are in SRM 7.0 using classic scenario.
    After approval of multi line Shopping Cart in SRM ,PR's are getting
    automatically created in backend R/3 system.After converting PR's into
    POs in backend R/3,we are observing that the delivery address for these
    PO'are getting printed at Item level and not at the Header Level
    inspite of the delivery address being same for all the Item level.
    As desired,the delivery address in the PO's should have the delivery
    address at the header level if the the delivery address is identical
    for all the Item Levels.
    However,if we create a PR directly in R/3 system and then convert these
    PR's into PO's in the backend R/3 system,we find that the deliver
    address are getting printed at the Header Level if the delivery address
    is same for all the item level(which is as desired)
    Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,

    It is standard process only.
    In Po delivery address is maintained at item level because to which address perticular material to be delivered,
    this may change from material to material or may not change

  • Client Side Javascript Validation not Working in Struts 1.x version

    I'm following the steps provioded in the below link for Javascript Client side validation but still it is not working.I'm struggling to get this work.
    "The framework automatically generates the browser specific JavaScript and validate the data only at the client side."From the above statement i undertstand that framework itself generates the javascript function for validating the field mentioned in validations.xml file so that we dont have to explicitly write a javascript function for
    validating the fields
    Do we need to call an explicit function
    Please need help on this.
    I have followed all the steps mentioned on the above link but Client Side Javascript Validation not Working in Struts 1.x version....
    Thanks and Regards,

    Please find my steps below....still getting an error.
    2> which version of commons-validation.jar needs to be downloaded ...Link please
        downloaded the latest commons-validation.jar and placed in lib.refreshed the project,and did a build.
        3> which DTD name to be specified in "validator-rules.xml" which is in accordance to commons-validator.jar file.
    validator-rules.xml ::
    <!DOCTYPE form-validation PUBLIC
              "-//Apache Software Foundation//DTD Commons Validator Rules Configuration 1.0//EN"
    <!DOCTYPE form-validation PUBLIC
    "-//Apache Software Foundation//DTD Commons Validator Rules Configuration 1.0//EN"
    i did as u said and im gettiong the below errorNov 5, 2009 4:33:08 PM org.apache.struts.validator.ValidatorPlugIn initResources
    SEVERE: Invalid byte 2 of 2-byte UTF-8 sequence.
    org.apache.commons.digester.xmlrules.XmlLoadException: Invalid byte 2 of 2-byte UTF-8 sequence.
         at org.apache.commons.digester.xmlrules.FromXmlRuleSet.addRuleInstances(
         at org.apache.commons.digester.Digester.addRuleSet(
         at org.apache.commons.digester.xmlrules.DigesterLoader.createDigester(
         at org.apache.commons.validator.ValidatorResourcesInitializer.initialize(
         at org.apache.struts.validator.ValidatorPlugIn.initResources(
         at org.apache.struts.validator.ValidatorPlugIn.init(
         at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.initModulePlugIns(
         at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.init(
         at javax.servlet.GenericServlet.init(
         at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.loadServlet(
         at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.load(
         at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.loadOnStartup(
         at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.start(
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChildInternal(
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChild(
         at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.addChild(
         at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployDirectory(
         at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployDirectories(
         at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployApps(
         at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.start(
         at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.lifecycleEvent(
         at org.apache.catalina.util.LifecycleSupport.fireLifecycleEvent(
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(
         at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.start(
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(
         at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine.start(
         at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService.start(
         at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardServer.start(
         at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.start(
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
         at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.start(
         at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.main(
    Need help forum members.....
    Please reply to my question 1  which has been asked before as belowDo i need to write explicit javascript function for validation in Struts (or) struts generates the javascript function by itself.??? Please explain with an example....
    Edited by: Deepak_A_L on Nov 5, 2009 4:37 PM                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

  • Incoterms on Item level is not updated on STO.

    Issue: they have created a STO with wrog incoterm, now the issue is that the Incoterms on PO--> Item level is not updated if Incoterms on Header level is changed. I suggested them to change incoterm on item level manually, but user is saying the problem is that SAP doesn't change automatically Incoterms on item level if Incoterms on Header level are changed??
    What user is saying..Is this correct? or any thoughts/solution to fix this issue?
    Can anyone suggest me on this?
    Thanks & Regards
    Suresh Babu

    Try this link
    How Incoterms gets defaulted for STO

  • Delivery address appearing at Item level and not at Header level in PO

    Hello Experts,
    We are facing an issue as described below:-
    We are in SRM 7.0 using classic scenario.
    After approval of multi line Shopping Cart in SRM ,PR's are getting
    automatically created in backend R/3 system.After converting PR's into
    POs in backend R/3,we are observing that the delivery address for these
    PO'are getting printed at Item level and not at the Header Level
    inspite of the delivery address being same for all the Item level.
    As desired,the delivery address in the PO's should have the delivery
    address at the header level if the the delivery address is identical
    for all the Item Levels.
    However,if we create a PR directly in R/3 system and then convert these
    PR's into PO's in the backend R/3 system,we find that the deliver
    address are getting printed at the Header Level if the delivery address
    is same for all the item level(which is as desired)
    Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,

    HI Paul,
    Thank you for your response.In our case even if all the Line/items level have same Plant and storage location still the delivery address is getting printed at Item level and not at Header Level and this is happening only for PO's created from PR's orginating from SRM7.0.
    However if we create PR's directly in R/3 and then convert them into PO's,the delivery address is getting printed at the Header level if the delivery address is same for all the Item level.
    Can you plz some insite into this?
    Your help will be highly appreciated.

  • Delivery address at Item level and not at Header level in PO

    Hello Experts,
    We are facing an issue as described below:-
    We are in SRM 7.0 using classic scenario.
    After approval of multi line Shopping Cart in SRM ,PR's are getting
    automatically created in backend R/3 system.After converting PR's into
    POs in backend R/3,we are observing that the delivery address for these
    PO'are getting printed at Item level and not at the Header Level
    inspite of the delivery address being same for all the Item level.
    As desired,the delivery address in the PO's should have the delivery
    address at the header level if the the delivery address is identical
    for all the Item Levels.
    However,if we create a PR directly in R/3 system and then convert these
    PR's into PO's in the backend R/3 system,we find that the deliver
    address are getting printed at the Header Level if the delivery address
    is same for all the item level(which is as desired)
    Any pointers will be highly appreciated,

    This may be an old note, but it may point you in the right direction: Note 450425 - Delivery Address creates individual R/3 address number.
    If you debug the function module in SRM that creates the PO in ECC, you can check if this is the case.

  • ASCP Taking Lead time to buy Item from Item Level and not from ASL

    Hi All.
    We have a buy Item Which is used at multiple Organization now we have defined processing Lead time for this Item at Item Level and ASL level (Global) However for different organization Like ABC and XYZ we have same supplier and Supplier Site for this item,
    Below is the details of Item
    Item's Processing Lead Time at Item Level
    Org - ABC - 35
    Org - XYZ - 15
    Item's Processing  Lead Time at ASL Level
    Org - ABC - 10
    Org - XYZ - 5
    Now when we run ASCP plan for org XYZ and check for exception, Item's Lead time is coming from Item Level (15) not from ASL Level (Does this is expected behavior from Oracle?)

    Hi Abhishek,
    I tested one more time with the same scenario, this time ASCP is considering Processing lead time form ASL only however it is considering processing lead time for another organization (When I am running ASCP plan for Org XYZ ASCP is considering Processing lead time for ABC).
    Does it is due to same supplier site for both the organization?
    Also it has an active sourcing rule for the same supplier

  • Add shopping cart item functionality is not working in PO

    Hi Experts,
    I found that Add shopping cart item functionality is not working in Purchase order.
    We are raising the Purchase order in SRM and i am trying to use the Add shopping cart item functionality to add the shopping carts line item in to purchase order.
    Once I will click on start search, it will give me a list of Approved shopping cat and when I am trying to add any shopping cart in PO line item, nothing is happening and  It is not allowing me to add the shopping cart line items in to this PO and also there is no error message.
    Please suggest us how i can fix this issue.
    Thanks in advance.

    If the shopping cart's have same vendor and company code, then only we can club the shopping carts
    in to single PO.
    Please go throught it

  • Validation not working when clearing an open item

    Hi SAP Gurus,
    We have a interesting scenario to discuss with you. We are using Legal Dunning Procedure so once legal action is intiated against the customer notifications are sent to the legal department if payments are received.
    Unfortunately this can happen only during the next dunning run which of course can occur in varying time intrevals. Therefore we need a validation to occur if a payment is received from a customer against whom legal action has been initiated.
    We tried using the following fields Date of the legal dunning proceedings, Dunning block, Dunning key, Dunning level but are not able to get the validation to work when attempting to clear the open item. These all work when trying to post a new document but fail when trying to clear a open item. Points will be given for helpful answers.

    this is the radio button
    <af:selectOneRadio value="#{bindings.Gender1.inputValue}"
                <f:selectItems value="#{bindings.Gender1.items}" id="si7"/>
    i use this sample

Maybe you are looking for

  • What happens when you forget your security questin answers?

    I just got the new ipod touch 5th generation. I use to have an ipod touch 4th generation. When i set up my new ipod i just used the same apple account to set it up. It let me buy apps & a downloaded all o the songs i had on my previous ipod, but when

  • Documents do not open in preview

    I find a document in Finder, click on it, and nothing. What happened?

  • ECC 6.0 Clone

    Hi All I have an ECC 6.0 (FI-CAX system ) on AIX 5.3 and Mainframe DB2 . Now I have got a requirement to clone the system to a new hardware (P6). Its a test system to downtime will not be an issue. I am planning to use the same database(shutdown curr

  • [SOLVED] AMD/ATI Drivers crashing on startx

    I ordered parts to build a new HTPC that just arrived today. I built it and got arch up and running without much trouble but I hit a snag when I started trying to get X up and running (isn't this always when things seems to go wrong? lol) The board h

  • Bold 9900 sound problem

    My bold9900 automatically turn off notifications sound like calls and sms. After restarting the mobile sound are activated. The sound of notification get off automatically after one or two days. Please help me..