Itemization for Material from PIR- Display all condition types

Hi,
I have 4 condition types in Purchase info record (PIR), when I do CK11n-Material Cost estimate for this material, in the Cost Component view ->Cost of Goods manufactured->Itemization for Material - I only see one line with total of the 4 condition types in the PIR.
But I would like to see all the 4 lines (Condition Types from PIR) in the Itemization for material. Can I achieve this with any configuration settings?
I would appreciate any response on this.
Thanks
Sree

I think you can do this if you map the purchasing condition types to origin groups. Try doing the following:
1. Use t-code OKZ1 to create the needed origin groups (one for each pricing condition type).
2. Use t-code OKK4 to map the pricing condition types to the origin group. To do this, select the valuation variant you are using and click on the delivery cost button.
3. Also in the valuation variant, change your sub-strategy sequence setting for material valuation to A (Quote price via condition table).
4. In t-code OKTZ you will probably need to assign these origin groups to one or more of your cost component.
Give this a try and see if it works for you.
Thanks,

Similar Messages

ME21N : Donu2019t copy the price for all condition types from last po

Dear.
When I create a purchase order the price for all condition types are copied from last purchase order inside the info-record.
But I have some condition types like FRA1 or FRA2 that I donu2019t want that system transfer price from last purchase order.
How can I do that ?
Thanks.

Hi Cris,
Go to SPRO>MM>PUR>Info Record>Define Price History> Here with your Purchasing organization if the tick is active that
Specifies that the order price history (PO price history) is to be updated with the effective price.
Normally, the order price history is updated with the net price.
Procedure
Set this indicator if you want the order price history to be updated with the effective price.
Thanks
Diwakar

Search for material from 2 Storage types

Hi,
When creating a delivery for Subcon PO Via ME2O the transfer order is created automatically from the source storage type
657 ( for example). The requirement is that the system should also look for material from source storage type 460 ( for example).
I did the following customization ( SPRO path):
1) Logistics execution -> Warehouse management -> Strategies -> Activate storage type search - > Determine search sequence --
For the combination of Warehouse number & Mvt type 541 ( GI to Subcon delivery) -- 657 and 460 are assigned.
2) Logistics execution -> Warehouse management -> Activities-> Transfers-> Define Mvt types-> For the combination of Warehouse number & Mvt type 541 -- I have assigned source storage type as 657.
With the above the system does the search from 657 stoarge type only and not from the both.
Is there any other setting to meet this requiremnet?
Best regards,
Prasad

Hi,
I removed 657 source storage type in the 541 mvt type set up ( Source storage type is Blank) . In the Movement Type set up for 541, "Ref.Stor.Type.Search" field is already with 541.
The Storage Type search sequence is maintained for the combination warehouse number & 541 mvt as 657 and 460 ( storage types).
When Delivery is created for Subcon PO, The Transfer order is not created automatcially ( Only delivery is created)
The requirement in detail is as below:
There are 2 plants ( AL70 & AL77) linked to 1 Warehouse (AL1). When delivery is created for subcon PO in plant AL70, the TO is also created automatically with source storage type as 657 and destination storage type as 916. The additional requirement is when delivery is created for Subcon PO in plant AL77, the TO aslo should be created automatically with source storage type as 460 and destination storage type as 916.
Regards,
Prasad

Safari 3.2.1 for XP does not display all graphics properly

Safari 3.2.1 for XP does not display all graphics properly, including the Apple Support Website http://www.apple.com/support/.

Maybe this will also help:
If your Safari won't open, one or more of the following procedures should fix it:
1. Go to Home/Library/Safari/ folder and remove the following two files:
• history.plist
• lastsession.plist
(Safari may not load properly If these two files are corrupted.)
2. Go to Home/Library/Caches/Metadata/Safari/ and remove the contents of that folder.
(These are just webhistory files and are not required for Safari to run. However, similar to preference files, problems can arise if they have become corrupt.)
3. Locate the cookies.plist file that's located in the Home/Library/Cookies/ folder and remove it.
(Again, faults in stored cookies may interfere with Safari's launch.)
4. Check whether any of your third-party internet plug-ins may be interfering with the launch of Safari by carefully moving them to the desktop (do NOT delete them at this stage). You can find these in two places:
Home/Library/Internet Plug-Ins/ folder, and Global plug-ins are located in the Macintosh HD/Library/Internet Plug-ins/ folder.
Restart Safari and place them back in the correct folders, one at a time, closing and re-opening Safari each time. If you discover that one of them was causing the problem with launching Safari, trash it and download and install a fresh copy.

Replicating SRM PO to ECC PO with all condition types

Hi Friends,
I want to Repliacte SRM to ECC PO with all condition types, can any one give me idea on this
thnx
Kumar Srini

I think you meant "replicate SRM PO's condition set to ECC PO". If this is the case, there are a couple of options.
Option 1. In ECC, implement BADI BBP_PO_INBOUND_BADI, method: BBP_MAP_BEFORE_BAPI
In the method implementation, make a remote function call to SRM BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL. Get the condition information (E_PRIDOC). Then map it to the BADI interface parameter BBP_POCONDHEADER / BBP_POCOND
Option 2. In SRM, copy your PO transfer driver FM, e.g. B46B_DPO_TRANSFER. In the copied FM, e.g. ZB46B_DPO_TRANSFER, get the PO condition information, insert two additional parameters, POCONDHEADER / POCOND when calling BBP_PO_INBOUND, and map the SRM PO condition to these two parameters accordingly. Then implement BADI BBP_DRIVER_DETERMINE to switch to your own FM driver.

Costing run with values for material from info record.

Hi All
there is requirement with my client, that when i run my costing run the values of the components in BOM should be from the latest purchase order.
For this i am maintined valuation criteria as price from info record and sub strategy as gross price from PO.
When i am create a PO the info record is created automatically in background. So when i run costing run the value is picked correctly.
Now when i create a PO with same material from diff vendor the info record is generated, but on costing run it picks the value from the info record of earlier vendor. For this i go and check the conditions tab in info record, ensure its balnk and save it. Again generate new PO and then run a costing run. This time the system reads the latest info record.
My problem is that i want to ensure that during the costing run, system should read the latest info record w/o manual intervention. System behaviour is not consistent when there is multiple vendor and same material info records. Sometimes it pick up the value and sometimes it refers the old info record.
Can any one help me out in resolving this issue. Its critical.
Regards
Rakesh

Hi!
Generally first info records will be created with vendor, then PO will be created, based on info records price, price will be updated in PO.
If you have more than one vendor for same material, you have to create info records for each vendor. then you need to maintain source list, where you can fix the vendor. If there is no fix vendor, then you can do schedule agreement with vendors, where you have to give proportionate percentages again each vendor.
Now for costing run :
1. if you have only one info record, the price will take from that info record.
2. if you have more than one info record, you need to mantain source list, where you can tick the fixed vendor, then system will take price from that vendor info record.
3. if there is no fixed vendor and you have maintained scehduel agreement with weightage to vendor, then higher percentage vendor info record price will be picked up.
4. if you have more info reocrds, not maintianed source list or schedule agreement, price will be picked up from first info record ( based on info record creation date).
5. if you have a schedule agreement, but you have given equal weightage for example 50% and 50%, then also system will pick up from first info record.
i think it is clear now.
regs,
ramesh b

Two prices for one material in sales order according condition type

Hi,
I configure the condition type according to following condition record:
Plant/ Sales Organization/ Distribution channel/ Material / Customer
(because system should calculate two prices for one material in two plants)
In the sales order screen, when user firstly select material , quantity, plant , system calculate the related price correctly but if user select the material and quantity and enter and after that select the plant, system will show the error message in pricing procedure and to have a price for material, user should update the price in the price condition in sales order.
It is so difficult for user to update one by one, because there are several sales orders which need to update.
Is it any way to solve this problem?
Thanks,

> In the sales order screen, when user firstly select material , quantity, plant , system calculate the related price correctly but if user select the material and quantity and enter and after that select the plant, system will show the error message in pricing
Hi,
Why to let the user press Enter button before entering plant value Obviously, system will give error, because it doesnt get all the required value based on which you have maintained condition records.
Ask the user to enter all the value at item level otherwise you will have go for the option that you are doing currently.
It is said prevention is better than cure
Hope you get some inputs
regards,
Sagar

Multiple class types for material master classification display default.

Hello,
We are running on R/3 4.7. We use several different class types for our material masters (001 and Z01). The problem this creates is the end user having to constantly tell the system which class type to use when going to the classification screen for different materials with different class types. If a user views one material's classification page with a particular class type (001) then looks at another material with a different class type (Z01) the system tries to pull in information from the last materials class type (001). The system tells the user there are no assignments for the class (001) in the material their viewing but there is one for class type (Z01). The user then has to select the class type that applies to the material master their trying to view. Is there a way for the system to automatically see when a material has only one class type assigned to it for it to automatically default it in without the user having to specify the class type?
Thanks,
JRW

Hi,
Check the configuration, have you maintained default class type for material type.
Logistic General> Material Master> Basic Setting> Material Type> Define attributes of Material Types>Select the material type> Double click on material type--> Class type
Edited by: P. Dhamane on Jun 4, 2010 3:21 PM

Table for existing PO/Sch.Agg pricing condition types

Hi Experts,
Which table will have PO / Sch.Aggrement - pricing condition types with values as maintained in PO (like freight / P&F etc). I have the input of PO/Sch.Agg ref, plant, vendor & material.
We have created Z condition types for freight/ P&F and using the same in PO/Sch.Agg.
Thanks,
Jeeva

HI,
Same status.
In table EKKO also field "Doc. condition no." is updating for PO only, which is same as we find in EKKI. For Sch.Agg it it not updating the Doc.Condition no and remains blank.
Any way i have gone thro a different route. since I am looking for delivery condition for a completed GR, I can pick the conditions from EKBZ table.
Thanks.
Jeeva.

Searching for Sales orders with a particular condition type..

Hi,
I'm searching for sales orders and purchase orders which contain a particular condition type, can someone please point me in the right direction?
Regards,
Attiq

Hi,
Goto SE16 and put KONV
Put the particular condition type that you are looking for and execute
Copy the KONV- KNUMV value for all the records found
Goto SE16 and put VBAK / VBRK
in the field VBAK-KNUMV or VBRK-KNUMV put the copied data from step three and execute
Note all the corresponding document number i.e. VBAK-VBELN / VBRK-VBELN
Pls reward if helpful.
Regards,
Pramod.

All My Files not displaying all file types

So, as above, in Finder using the default display by file type, the only results I see are for Spreadsheets, Developer and Documents.
No seperate lists for PDFs, Images or any other file type.
Looked in preferences but can't seem to see any place where this might be enabled.
Glum...

Here's another data point: I found some PDFs under my Documents folder that weren't showing up in AMF. I found that simply opening one up in Acrobat Reader would cause it to show up in AMF (I didn't have to change and re-save the PDF).
I did notice that if I selected multiple PDFs at once and opened them all at the same time, some of them would then appear in AMF, while others wouldn't. But opening up a single PDF by itself would always add it to the files shown in AMF (as long as the PDF was somewhere under my User folder - if I first copied the PDF to a second hard drive that's not under my User folder and *then* opened it, it still wouldn't show up in AMF.)
In short, here's what I've discovered so far:
1) AMF doesn't seem to index anything that's not somewhere under my User folder.
2) Not everything under my User folder shows up in AMF, but if I open a "missing" file that's under my User folder, it will then show up in AMF. (Except for pictures and songs - see #3)
3) AMF doesn't index anything that's in my iPhoto or iTunes libraries (even after opening a picture in iPhoto or playing a song in iTunes.)
4) AMF doesn't index attachments to Mail messages unless you download the attachment (presumably because it's then stored under your User folder.)
5) AMF will only seem to (sometimes) index Excel spreadsheets if they're saved as .xlsx files. Even opening, changing and saving a .xls file won't get it to show up in AMF afterward. Spreadsheets are strange, in fact. Even with some .xlsx files, they'll show up in AMF *while I have them open in Excel*, but as soon as I close them in Excel, they disappear from AMF again. This is the only types of file I've seen disappear from AMF after they've shown up once - all the other file types seem to stay in AMF once you can get them to show up there.

Standard Report for Materials Cost Component Structure - PO Condition Type

Dear experts,
We are using below cost component structure (CCS) for materials:
- Direct materials
- import duty
- import handling
In which, all those above CCS are achieved through below condition type in Purchasing Info Record. When doing the standard cost estimate through costing run, we have successfully grouped all those condition types into their respective CCS. The problem is, while executing the standard report of "result of costing run" (S_ALR_87099930), the sytem groups all those three CCS into CCS "Direct materials" only.
I have tried different standard layouts, but still got no way to show all those CCS separately in the standard report.
Please kindly suggest what approach should i take
Thank you very much
BR, Erwin
@edit
Solved.
Edited by: Erwin Hartono on Nov 16, 2011 9:16 AM

Hi
Check cost elements assigned to structure. For this go to transaction code OKTZ and select your CCS and double click on Assignment Cost Component-Cost element interval.
Srinivas

Table links from Purchase order to condition types

Hi,
I am looking for the tables to go from purchase order, and to read the conditions associated with the PO.
I have EKKO, and EKPO, but I cannot find the table where the condition information is stored. I have KONV and KONP, but they seem to be the tables where the condition type info is stored, not the link table where the purchase order specific information is stored.
Can somebody please point in the right direction?
Regards
Piet
Edited by: Piet Strydom on May 12, 2009 12:52 PM

Hi,
The PO and the Condition Record Number Link happens in the Table EKKI.
from this table get the condition Record number line item wise and execute in KONV.
Hope so it helps
Regards
Anjanna
you can check the below thread posted by self for further ing
Re: PO item Condition Record number and delivery address of PO - Need a table n
Edited by: Shiva Rajanala on May 12, 2009 1:42 PM

Transfer material from Storage location to Storage type.

Hello,
At the time of usage decision we are posting the stock in "To Reserve stock" for that we have created seperate storage location ie for Sample material.
we having two samples one is customer sample and other is in house sample both the samples we are posting in same storage location.
Client want to differentiate these two samples, so we have created two storage types.
Now My question is " can we transfer the samples in different storage types from Storage location.
This is the QM and WM integration.
Please advice
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Anil

Hello Anil
I don't think you can transfer from storage location to storage type.
If your purpose is to differentiate these two samples, then why not use different Sample types with different number ranges and thus identify them. You don't have to get into QM-WM integration just for that.
If you want you may also set up 2 different physical sample locations: That would be ideal.
SPRO/IMG/Quality Management/Quality Inspection/Sample Management/Define Physical-Sample Types
SPRO/IMG/Quality Management/Quality Inspection/Sample Management/Define Number Range
SPRO/IMG/Quality Management/Quality Inspection/Sample Management/Define Physical-Sample Locations
On the application side you may use the sample management procedures to deal with samples. See the following link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/b8/b9b3341a933f50e10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm
Does that work? Let me know.

Is all condition type going to maintain in condition record

hi,
is all comdition type going to maintain in condition record or limited condition if limited condition type what are those please explain in details
regards
CRK

HI,
Check this link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_di46c2/helpdata/EN/dd/5616b2545a11d1a7020000e829fd11/content.htm
Regards
KK

Itemization for Material from PIR- Display all condition types

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for