Java RTS 2.1 Beta free evaluation release for Solaris and Linux available

Hi:
I would like to notify this forum that a free evaluation release of
Java Real-Time System (Java RTS) 2.1 Beta is now available for downloading
at our public web site.
Supported platforms are Solaris/SPARC, Solaris/x86, and Linux/x86 with
real-time POSIX APIs. The specific Linux distributions which this release
has been tested on are: SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 10 (released)
and Red Hat Enterprise MRG 1.0 (beta). As for the Solaris versions,
both Solaris 10 Update 3 and Update 4 are supported.
The URL for the web page where to start in order to be able to get to
the download link is:
http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/realtime/rts/
The download link will be presented to you after you fill out a quick
survey and agree with a click-through, 90-days e-license.
The latest version of the Java RTS Beta technical documentation
bundle included with the product is being separately maintained at
our public website and can be accessed starting from here:
http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/realtime/reference/rts_productdoc.html
Thanks,
-Carlos
Carlos B. Lucasius
Java SE Embedded and Real-Time Engineering
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/embedded/index.jsp
http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/realtime.jsp
http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/realtime/faq.jsp
http://developers.sun.com/learning/javaoneonline/j1sessn.jsp?sessn=TS-1331&yr=2007&track=5
http://developers.sun.com/learning/javaoneonline/j1sessn.jsp?sessn=TS-2901&yr=2007&track=5
http://developers.sun.com/learning/javaoneonline/j1lab.jsp?lab=LAB-7250&yr=2007&track=4
http://www.sun.com/training/catalog/courses/DTJ-4103.xml
http://www.youtube.com/v/xH1yUXd9krU
http://blogs.sun.com/jtc/
http://blogs.sun.com/delsart
http://blogs.sun.com/bollellaRT

Hello,
Just a quick question: can we have an official position from Sun regarding support of earlier releases of Solaris with Java RTS 2.1? Our customer is currently running Solaris 10 Update 3 with current Recommended patches, and the 2.1 beta cyclic driver supported this version of Solaris. However with the official release version of 2.1, support for U3 disappeared (only U4 and U5 are now supported). Aside from "rubber stamping" the Solaris build via /etc/release, is there a technical reason why U3 is no longer supported? As long as our kernel is up to date, can we safely use 2.1? Or is it just a case of being unable to officially support and test so many releases of Solaris?
Is this a general rule-of-thumb we can expect in future: only supporting the last 2 updates of Solaris 10?
Your advice is appreciated.
Thanks,
Dave.

Similar Messages

Java RTS 2.1 General Availability free evaluation releases available

Hi:
I would like to notify this forum that free evaluation releases of
Java Real-Time System (Java RTS) 2.1 General Availability (GA)
are available for download for the following platforms:
* Solaris 10 (Update 4 and Update 5) on SPARC and x86
* Linux with real-time POSIX APIs on x86. The specific Linux
distributions which this release has been tested on (at the time
of this writing) are: SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 10 SP2
(released) and Red Hat Enterprise MRG 1.0 Errata (to be released).
The URL for the web page where to start in order to be able to
get to the download link for any of the Java RTS 2.1 GA evals is:
[http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/realtime/rts/]
You will be asked to fill out a quick survey and agree to a click-
through e-license, then a download link will be e-mailed to you.
The latest version of the Java RTS 2.1 GA technical documentation
bundle included with the product is being separately maintained at
our product website and can be accessed starting from here:
[http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/realtime/reference/rts_productdoc.html]
Please also make sure to check out our updated FAQ:
[http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/realtime/faq.jsp]
Thanks,
-Carlos
Carlos B. Lucasius
Java SE Embedded and Real-Time Engineering
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
[http://sites.google.com/site/javartsandjavaseforembedded/]

Hello,
Just a quick question: can we have an official position from Sun regarding support of earlier releases of Solaris with Java RTS 2.1? Our customer is currently running Solaris 10 Update 3 with current Recommended patches, and the 2.1 beta cyclic driver supported this version of Solaris. However with the official release version of 2.1, support for U3 disappeared (only U4 and U5 are now supported). Aside from "rubber stamping" the Solaris build via /etc/release, is there a technical reason why U3 is no longer supported? As long as our kernel is up to date, can we safely use 2.1? Or is it just a case of being unable to officially support and test so many releases of Solaris?
Is this a general rule-of-thumb we can expect in future: only supporting the last 2 updates of Solaris 10?
Your advice is appreciated.
Thanks,
Dave.

Is Oracle 11g released for NW04s and ECC6.0?

Is Oracle 11g released for NW04s and ECC6.0?
Please help. Thanks!

Plain and simple: No, it isn't.
Check the SAP on Oracle homepage [here|SAP on Oracle] in SDN and read the latest development news on this topic including a rough schedule.
regards,
Lars

Announcement Oracle9iAS Portal Patch Release 3.0.9.8.3 For Solaris is now available

Oracle9iAS Portal Patch Release 3.0.9.8.3 For Solaris is now available for download from metalink. Bugnumber for the patch release is 2131815.
You must install this patch release over an Oracle9iAS 1.0.2.2 installation of Oracle9iAS Portal. You can install it over either a production installation (3.0.9.8.0) or a patched installation (3.0.9.8.1, 3.0.9.8.2). This patch release is cumulative and it incorporates the changes from the earlier patches (3.0.9.8.1, 3.0.9.8.2). The installation instructions are in README.TXT and RELNOTES.HTM contained in the patch release.
The patch will be available for other platforms by the end of May.

I saw this warning in the content area API home page.
Warning - The Content Area APIs available in 3.0.8.x and 3.0.9.x will not work with Oracle9iAS Portal 9.0.2. They are not available with this release
Will there be other API's?
Are you removing the concept of loading an item through APIs?
Thanks in advance
Harish

[svn:cairngorm3:] 18107: cairngorm3-3.0.16 release for flex3 and flex4

Revision: 18107
Revision: 18107
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2010-10-08 14:01:31 -0700 (Fri, 08 Oct 2010)
Log Message:
cairngorm3-3.0.16 release for flex3 and flex4
3.0.16 in flex 4 is
Reactor Summary:

Thanks for this update.
Do you plan to put on this repository only parsley/swiz/... dependencies that Cairngorm libs support or the latest dependencies versions? I was wondering that because I saw you didn't add Parsley 2.3.2

Difference between release for Transport and Export

Hi,
can anybody tell me the difference between the release for Transport of a change list and the Export Design Object ? When a change list is released is it not possible to select File System as mode or CMS ?
Thx.

These relate to how your transport system is configured.
If you use FTP you cannot release for transport, and if you have CMS, I don;t beleive you can FTP.
Release Transfer
Transfer design objects within an Integration Repository from one software component version to another.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/93/a3a74046033913e10000000a155106/frameset.htm

What's the difference between task list release for order and release for c

What's the difference between task list release for order and release for cost?

Pallavi,
The status of the task list determines in which other application areas the respective task list may be used.
Release for costing: means that the task list can be used to calculate costs in Transaction IA16 i.e. the costs for the task list operations would be calculated if released for costing status is set.
Release for use in the order: Released for Order means that you can use the task list in an order i.e. you could include operations from a task list in an order.
Regards,
Usman

New Java SE for Embedded 6 free evaluation releases on ARM/Linux available

Hi:
People who are reading this forum might be interested to know about
Sun's Java SE for Embedded 6 releases on ARM/Linux that have been
made available today for free evaluation -- three updated releases (for
ARM v6 and v7) and two new releases (for ARM v5), both headless
and headful versions are available:
[http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/embedded.jsp|http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/embedded.jsp]
[http://java.sun.com/javase/embedded/system_requirements.jsp|http://java.sun.com/javase/embedded/system_requirements.jsp]
When you select a Java SE for Embedded eval through either of the
above URLs, the download link will be sent to you by e-mail after you
fill out a quick survey and agree to a click-through, 90-days e-license.
For more information about Sun's Java SE for Embedded product, please
start at the main web page for this product:
[http://java.sun.com/javase/embedded/|http://java.sun.com/javase/embedded/]
This page also includes a link through which you can [contact Sun|http://www.javelinfeedback.com/sun/index.jsp?pi=353770340fcc19a6ca0f558647d48f48] to submit
any further questions about the Java SE for Embedded product.
Thanks,
Carlos B. Lucasius
Java SE Embedded and Real-Time Engineering
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
[http://sites.google.com/site/javartsandjavaseforembedded/|http://sites.google.com/site/javartsandjavaseforembedded/]

Hello,
Just a quick question: can we have an official position from Sun regarding support of earlier releases of Solaris with Java RTS 2.1? Our customer is currently running Solaris 10 Update 3 with current Recommended patches, and the 2.1 beta cyclic driver supported this version of Solaris. However with the official release version of 2.1, support for U3 disappeared (only U4 and U5 are now supported). Aside from "rubber stamping" the Solaris build via /etc/release, is there a technical reason why U3 is no longer supported? As long as our kernel is up to date, can we safely use 2.1? Or is it just a case of being unable to officially support and test so many releases of Solaris?
Is this a general rule-of-thumb we can expect in future: only supporting the last 2 updates of Solaris 10?
Your advice is appreciated.
Thanks,
Dave.

Fonts in java apps for win and linux

Hi everyone.
i need to build an application mult-plataform, to run in windows and linux...
but i don�t know waht font i must use...the default font that java takes doesn�t exist in linux (dialog)...
waht font should i use in my app??
thanx

For going multi-platform it is easiest to stick to the logical fonts: Fonts named "Serif", "SansSerif", "Monospaced", "Dialog", and "DialogInput".
These fonts are guaranteed to exist on any platform, although their implementations may be different. If you use others then you'll have to figure out how to deal with cross platform issues.
Jeff

Evaluation version for "Base Deployment Engine " available?

Hello,
we have one "Development-version" to develop testplans.
Now we are creating a cutom OPUI that calls the teststand-API. It works fine with the "Development-version".
Normally it should be enough to just install the "Base Deployment" to compile and use our custom OPUI.
The price is ~500EUR for the "Base Deployment"
Question is now:
Is there an evalution-download available to check if i can use our custom OPUI with the "Base deployment"?
I only find an evaluation-download for the full "Development-version"
Thanks

Deleting the license files will have the same effect as having an evaluation license, that's correct. Edited: Actually, deleting the license file will only trigger evaluation mode if the original evaluation license files are on the machine. This would be the case for a clean install, but may not be the case for OnlyOne's install. In that case, deleting the license files would just cause TestStand to not open.
However, my interpretation of the question (please correct me if I'm wrong, OnlyOne), is that he was wanting an eval version of base deployment so that he could confirm that his OI would work with a base deployment license. If that's the case, I think it's an equally accurate test to use an activated Base Deployment license.
Daniel E.
TestStand Product Support Engineer
National Instruments

Free XML feeds for Stock and Weather ?

Hi All,
Please let me know if there is any XML feed available for Stock and Weather. I googled a lot but couldn't find free XML feed providers.
Thanks,
Manjunath

Hi,
I tried finance.yahoo.com for stock. I prepared a sample file in which I used 'trace' to see the response. However I can't see any XML data.
I have attached both .fla and .swf files. Could you please check did I miss anything in the actionscript part?

Which is better: XDCAM or ProRes for editing and upload?

I am trying to determine if I'm better of staying with my native XDCAM files or instead converting them to one of the Pro Res codecs? One of my main issues is that the files that I upload to YouTube never look as good as I feel they ought to, nor as good as other HD files that I've seen online.

Well, neither would be good to upload. YouTube wants H.264.
Both look good. ProRes is easier on the system, smoother to edit, but has larger file sizes. XDCAM native isn't bad to work with, it just can take longer to do final rendering...depending on the system you are using to edit.
Both will convert to H.264 and look good.
Shane

Free 3D Models for MAYA and MAX

Friends I have found a site http://gfx-3d-model.blogspot.com where Free 3D Models MAYA and 3DS MAX are available. Low poly game models are also available here, updated everyday.
http://gfx-3d-model.blogspot.com

thank you for the info - found it very usefull
- http://waolabs.biz

Patch released for solaris yet?

Hi, anyone know if patch 118786-01 has been released yet? If not, does anyone know when it will be released? Its counterpart for Redhat is available for download (118788-01)

You can check using
showrev -p | grep <patchnumer>
if the patch is already installed. Most likely this is the case for the version you use so there's no need to update any patches.
However, it's always a good idea to keep the system up-to-date, especially if you plan to use ZFS as filesystem.
I use "pca" to update our systems (http://www.par.univie.ac.at/solaris/pca/) - much easier to handle than "Solaris Update connection" - and fewer problems.
Markus

I cant get adobe reader or what can I have that is free I paid for Adobe and its gone

I went to start menu on computer and clicked on adobe and it said it is not installed and I cant get it back please help

You go to https://iforgot.apple.com/appleid if you don't remember the ID.
If you know the ID but not the password, you go to https://iforgot.apple.com and reset it.
If you can't do either of those, you call Apple and speak to someone in account security.

Java RTS 2.1 Beta free evaluation release for Solaris and Linux available

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for