KE380 for finished good with released cost estimate

Dear Gurus,
We have following error.
No product costing estimate could be found
Message no. KE380
Diagnosis
In Profitability Analysis (CO-PA), the system tried to find a product cost estimate for product 20010412 in plant FA03 that uses costing variant LG01.
The system looked for the cost estimate using costing key LG1 as defined in the CO-PA Customizing
settings.
System Response
No estimate could be found.
Procedure
Check the settings for valuation using product costing. If necessary, create a product cost estimate for this product.
The thing is this error occurs for materials with released cost estimate.
Before we had error ke350 for all materials considering DIEN and ROH.
After supressing the error in kepc we can release invoices with DIEN and ROH materials.
But we got another ke380.
How can we solve this issue?
With best regards,
Kamila.

Hi,
This type of errror is usual if costing based COPA is active and you are using Costing key to valuate the inventory using the Standard cost estimation.
When the costing key is been configured in COPA to access the standard cost estimation and is accordingly assigned to material types, then when the billing is released to accounting system tries to find out the SCE in the material master to pass the COGM to COPA. If it doesnt find the same, it will throw the error.
Hence, run SCE and update your material master.
Thanks & Regards,
Ravi Kumar

Similar Messages

PO for Finished Goods with Tax Code - Inventorise

Hi All,
Our Client is procuring Finished Goods from Domestic Vendor & Excise Duty is paid to the Vendor for that i am defining the tax code in PO. Over here For the Finished Good in Tax Code it is not capturing - (Condition Type - JMO2). I have checked it in PO for ROH, HALB tax code is working perfectly with (Condition Type - JMO2). I like to know will it work for finished goods or not. In J1ID i have maintained Excise Rate.
I had followed the following steps.
1) Material code- Chapter id maintained in J1ID
2) Vendor code excisable in J1ID
3) Maintain condition record in FV11 for the correct validity period
4) Check the PO creation date whcih should fall between condition record validity period
Every thing is maintained i have checked it Thoroughly fot this particular material i am not getting it. This one is a finished goods material.
I am not able to identify what is happening.
I will give the flow so that you can help me out.
1. Created Material - Finished with all views except - Classification, Forecasting,
Work Scheduling & QM
2. Create Info Record - Tax Code given
3. J1ID - Chapter ID, Chap ID with Material, *** Val for Mat, Vendor Excise Detail, Excise ind. for Plant, Excise ind. for Plant & Vendor, & Excise Tax Rate.
4. FV11 - Maintained till - 31.12.9999.
5. FTXP - Tax Code is Maintained & it's working fine with other PO.
6. ME21N - PO is done for Domestic vendor with Standard PO With no condition & With only tax code for ED & CST.
7. In J1ID cenvat determination has been maintained.
Also the material type should be raw in material chapter id combination instead of RG1 even though the material is finished to take credit of excise it should be maintained as RAW .
Over Here if i see i am not able to capture (JMO2 A/P Eduty for Inven 0.000%) &
For Sale tax i have maintained it in FTXP as (A/P C Sales Tax Inv NVV 12.500% JIP1) but it is not appering in PO Tax code. I can See the sale tax is geting updated in Tax code for Inventorise if i give it with out ED in tax code. With ED it is not Appering in Taxcode.
Can you help me resolving the issue.
Once again thanks for youre help.
Thanks in Advance,
sapuser.
Edited by: sapuser on Dec 26, 2008 10:10 AM

Hi All,
Just give a check by entering cenvat determination table. System checks this by default for excise details. Enter i/p and o/p material as same.
Hope this will resolve you Problem,
Pherasath

PO for Finished Goods with Tax Code

Hi All,
Our Client is procuring Finished Goods from Domestic Vendor & Excise Duty is paid to the Vendor for that i am defining the tax code in PO. Over here For the Finished Good in Tax Code it is not capturing - (Condition Type - JMO1). I have checked it in PO for ROH, HALB tax code is working perfectly with (Condition Type - JMO1). I like to know will it work for finished goods or not. In J1ID i have maintained Excise Rate.
Help me to resolve tis issue.
Thanks in Advance,
sapuser
Edited by: sap user on Dec 18, 2008 4:04 PM

Hi All,
Every thing is maintained i have checked it Thoroughly fot this particular material i am not getting it. This one is a finished goods material.
I am not able to identify what is happening.
I will give the flow so that you can help me out.
Created Material - Finished with all views except - Classification, Forecasting,
Work Scheduling & QM
Create Info Record - Tax Code given
J1ID - Chapter ID, Chap ID with Material, *** Val for Mat, Vendor Excise Detail, Excise ind. for Plant, Excise ind. for Plant & Vendor, & Excise Tax Rate.
FV11 - Maintained till - 31.12.9999.
FTXP - Tax Code is Maintained & it's working fine with other PO.
ME21N - PO is done for Domestic vendor with Standard PO With no condition & With only tax code for ED & CST.
Over Here if i see i am not able to capture (JMO1 - A/P Eduty for Setoff 0.000 %).
Any other thing has to be taken care let me know.
Help me out in Solving this issue.
sapuser

Kanban for finished goods (discrete manufacturing)

Hi gurus,
I am using kanban for finished goods(with MRP) to triggers production order(discrete manufacturing). If i set the status "empty" system is creating a planned order directly. It is not coming for MRP run. I suppose, that planned order should be created through MRP run(since i am using kanban with MRP). Can you please tell what settings i need to be checked?
Regards
Rajib Pathak

Hi,
Pls. find details about settings for KANBAN With MRP:
KANBAN With MRP
Prerequisites
In this process, the storage location assigned to the supply area is not excluded from MRP.
If a material is planned and procured with MRP, you must make the following settings:
You must maintain a valid MRP type for the material. This means, the setting "ND" (No planning) is not allowed.
You must maintain all other control parameters required for MRP for the material.
You must maintain a repetitive manufacturing profile (in the MRP data screen) for replenishment strategies with a cost collector (in-house production with run schedule quantities, manual KANBAN). In the SAP standard system, a profile is available that is specially intended for KANBAN, that is, using this profile, the system creates a cost collector without a run schedule header.
Features
Here, the total production quantity or the procurement quantities of a certain period are planned in the planning run and the replenishment elements are also created in the planning run. For in-house production, you can use either Repetitive Manufacturing or production orders to plan the production quantities per period. For external procurement, all the standard replenishment elements are available. The replenishment elements created in the planning run, however, are not intended to trigger production or replenishment directly. Instead, they exist to provide the supply source with a preview. Actual production and material flow are controlled and triggered by setting the kanban to FULL and EMPTY. Backflushes and goods receipts are posted with no reference to the kanban. This means that you can backflush daily quantities, for example.
In this procedure, the following is valid for materials with BOMs:
Components that are used in KANBAN materials can be planned using any one of the MRP procedures. However, the system has to be organized so that the supply source does not produce the material for the replenishment element created in MRP immediately but awaits the kanban request.
As the system creates preview data in the procedure with MRP, it is particularly useful for replenishment with run schedule quantities (Repetitive Manufacturing) and scheduling agreement releases.
HOpe this helps.
Regards,
Tejas

Split valuation for Finished Goods - Target cost was not updated

Hi,
We are following split valuation for 'Finished goods'.
Valuation typte 1 is for 'manufacture' and
Valuation type 2 is for 'External procurement'
For production orders with this material, we are not getting target costs. It is showing zero.
We have done release of standard cost estimate before creation of production orders and goods receipt for these orders. But still it is not updating.
Pls guide me.
Regards
MadhuSekhar Gupta

Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
At the time of variance calculation only the credit part of target cost will update and at the time of goods receipt debit part of the target cost will update.
Our client has done goods receipt but debit part of the target cost was not updated. and the order status is DLV.
I simulated the scenario in QAS by creating new finished goods materials (Industry-Construction) one is with split valuation and another is without split valuation, then the debit part of target cost was updated at the time of goods receipt and credit part was updated at the time of variance calculation for both the materials. So this problem was not arised because of split valuation.
Was this problem arising because of the material master data, because for one material it is updating and for another it is not for the same configuration?
Regards
MadhuSekhar Gupta
Edited by: gms gupta on Oct 22, 2011 3:39 PM
Edited by: gms gupta on Oct 22, 2011 3:41 PM

How to get unit cost for finished goods in prod order

HI all,
IN a production order of type PP04, there is cost analysis you can get from CO03. This shows the cost for finished goods and BOM components. Would anyone know how the cost for finished goods are calculated ? The issue i have is that the unit cost of the finished goods is not correct. It is higher than what it should be. I looked at the moving avg price at material master but the cost used in calculation is different than in material master. Can anyone shed light how finished goods are calculated and why it is picking up a higher unit cost ? Where is the higher cost coming from for finished goods material as shown in CO03 ? The BOM materials are picking unit cost correctly. Would this have anything to do with cost settlement ?
thank you.
joyce

Hi,
Finished goods price will depend on BOM componenet price, activity price and overhead price. Check whether this prices are picking correctly or not.
Regards,
Sreekanth

Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product

Hi Experts,
Message no. KE350, Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product "2286940000". Please suggest me to resolve this issue.
Points will be provided for good solution.
Regards,
Jay

Hi Jaya
This means that your customization is wrong then...
In KE4J or KEPC you have assigned costing keys to your material types or some other combination... You should have done this config in a way that costing key is not called for in the case of non valuated materials...
In Ke40 you have defined costing key where in you have specified "Issue error msg if no cost estimate found".. This costing key is assigned in KE4J or KEPC in a way that it is getting called even in case of non valuated materials...
Do you have a separate mat type for non valuated material? If yes, remove this mat type from KE4J/KEPC..
If you dont have separate mat type i.e. in the same mat type if you have both valuated and non valuated, then you have a problem.. You would get stuck in that case
Regards
Ajay M

Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product "117122"

Hi people,
We have the error:
=====================
Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product "117122"
Diagnosis
In Profitability Analysis (CO-PA), the system tried to valuate a line item using the current standard cost estimate.
In order to determine the current plan period, the system needs to read the valuation segment of the material master.
The system has found that the current plan period is not filled forproduct "117122" in plant "UBE1".
We have the follow configuration in trans.: KE40:
. Determine material cost estimate
   . Transf. Standard Cost Estimate
. Costing Variant
. Control Data for Standard Cost Estimate
   . Period Indicator = "Current Standard Cost Estimate acc. to entry in mat master
. Addiitonal data CO-PC
    . Transfer cost estimate in controlling area currency "activated"
We think the reason about our error is because the field above is activated and some configuration more is necessary for this case. For examplo: Trans.: OKYW and this one was not configurated yet.
Do you know what happend?
If we need to configure some transation, or sonly process the cost estimate?
Thanks,
Rosana.

Hello Guido
Thank you very much for your return.
It is happenning in a Client that some people are doing the configuration.
Before we didin't have in KE40, the fiel "Transfer cost estimate in controlling area currency" activated.
And now, the people activate that in this new Client and I don't know the impact about that.
I think we have to make the configuration in OKYW.
The other transation you told me, we don't have any information.
Could you tell me some other idea what happend?
Message error is just "Message no. KE350"
Abou claculate the cost:
It was calculated by trans.: CK11N for future planning and the real wasn't not possible to release because this material already have moviments.
Could you tell us is there is some thing more to do?
Thanks,
Rosana.

Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product " 200038 "

Hi,
I am getting an error:
Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product " 200038 " (Message KE350).
Kindly assist on the same?

If this material is mto material go to t.code KE40 and maintain define access to standard cost estimate define cost key with
"Transfer sales orde cost estimatex".
If it is mts material define costing key with Transfer std cost estimate and in costing data
costing variant : ppc1
costing verstion: 1
period indicator: Release std cost estimate matching with goods issue or material costing matching posting date.
This will resolve ur problem.

If Excise invoice required for finished goods.

Hi All
I have doubt, whether excise invoice is required for finished goods or not. As I am trying to create MIGO doc for PO of finished material, and it is saying, no excise invoice possible for finished material RG1.
Can you advise please.
Regards
Mukta

HI
Thanks for this. When we are executing Utilization transaction J2IU, it is giving dump after prompting popup with 'Data will be lost PLA NCCD B35', 'No record selected , excise invoice cancelled'.
Run time error is saying -
Short text
    Structure-type conflict when calling a FORM
What happened?
    Error in the ABAP Application Program
    The current ABAP program "J_1IRUTZ" had to be terminated because it has
    come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.
The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_DYN_CALL_ILLEGAL_TYPE', was
not caught and
therefore caused a runtime error.
The reason for the exception is:
The call of the FORM "DETERMINE_DEFAULT_VALUES" is incorrect:
The actual parameter no. 2 is at PERFORM not compatible with the
structure type requested by FORM "DETERMINE_DEFAULT_VALUES".
The FORM "DETERMINE_DEFAULT_VALUES" is defined in program "SAPMJ1II".
This error occurs in Unicode if the fragment view of the types is
incompatible.
Can some one suggest if we need to apply any OSS NOTE.
Regards
Mukta

Valuation with Material cost estimate

Hi,
I am getting an error: "Valuation with material cost estimate:error with product 003443434(material number)
Does anyone know which transaction is used to correct this error?
Thanks

Hi,
Go to MM02. Select the views of the materials i.e. accounting 1 & 2 , costing 1 & 2 . Look at the valuation class u have maintained for the same material in the view Accounting 1.
Hope u will get ur problem solved..Assign points, if helpful.
Satya

Uploading Production Requirements For Finished Goods From External System To Run MRP For Components in SAP.

Hello Production Planning experts,
I'm looking to solve the current business problem:
The company bought a third party software (JD Edwards) to calculate production requirements instead of using SAP's standard Production Planning or a tool like SAP's APO. They run a batch job to query Sales Orders, Deliveries, available stock, stock in transit, etc. from sap and feed/upload it to the third party software so it can calculate the Finished Goods Production Requirements for them. They love the third party software, so replacing it is not an option. Since the third party software is already taking into account Sales Orders, Deliveries, available stock, stock in transit, etc. from SAP, it just outputs a "Finished Goods Production Schedule" by week.
My questions are:
1) What's the best way to upload something like that in SAP in the form of Planned Orders or something of that nature?
After i get that schedule in SAP:
2) Is there any way to calculate components' requirements for that "Finished Goods Production Schedule" alone? The company would like to IGNORE existing stock AND expected-goods-issues in the future (sales orders, deliveries, etc) for Finished Goods ONLY. The components calculations would work the standard MRP way, taking into account existing stock and AND expected-goods-issues in the future (sales orders, deliveries, etc)
I started looking into Master Production Schedule (MPS), but I don't know if that's the right approach since I'm not very familiar with it.
Thanks in Advance! I will gladly reward points for helpful/correct answers.

Hello Oscar
I suggest you to upload your production plan in the for of "Planned Independent Requirements" using BAPI BAPI_REQUIREMENTS_CREATE. Later, MRP will create planned orders to cover the PIRs.
If you don't want to consider the existing stock of the finished product, you should use the planning strategy 11 to create your PIRs. Take a look on the following link for more details about this planning strategy:
Gross Requirements Planning (11) - Demand Management (PP-MP-DEM) - SAP Library
Here you will find the following information:
The make-to-stock strategy gross requirements planning is particularly useful in mass production environments; it is often combined with repetitive manufacturing. This strategy is particularly useful if you need to produce, regardless of whether you have stock or not. For instance, steel or cement producers might want to use this strategy because they cannot shut down production; a blast furnace or a cement factory must continue to produce, even if this means having to produce to stock.
This strategy is also frequently used if there is a Material Requirements Planning system in a legacy system that needs to be linked to an SAP system which serves as a production execution system. The legacy system calculates a specific production plan, which has to be executed, regardless of the stock situation in the SAP system
It looks like this planning strategy is exactly what you are looking for.
BR
Caetano

Discontinuity and Follow-up Materials for Finish Goods

Dear all,
We have used for a long time the Discontinuity functionality and Follow-up Materials for Raw and Packaging materials (components in BOMs).
We would like to use the same functionalities for Finish Goods, but after setting fields in MRP4 View, it seems not to work as it did for components.
Is it possible to reproduce the same effect in Finish Goods as we had with components, i.e., use some kind of Discontinuity and Follow-up materials for Finish Goods?
We currently work with R/3 V.4.7.
Thank you all in advance for any support.
Best Regards,
Alberto

Dear Alberto,
If my understanding is correct then this discontinued material concept works only for the components and not for the finished
product during MRP.
Discontinuation Data Use
In MRP, the discontinuation functionality is used to transfer dependent requirements of a component to one or several follow-up
materials, if the requirements are no longer covered by stock. You can also define a follow-up material in the bill of material.
Check this link to explore more.
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_05/helpdata/EN/b1/c044d1439a11d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Moving average price for finished goods

Hi All
I am using moving average price for finished goods. My question is, Does the price on the material master record adjusts, when we do goods receipt on a production order( If there are variances)?
here is a scenario:
Moving avrage price of finished goods=2$ and total stock =1
it has two components in the Bom
Raw1-3$
Raw2-3$
Now when I am producing 1 qy of finished goods with 6 $ of Raw materials, moving average price of fert should be 6+2/2=4 $. But I noticed the moving average price in the material master record is not changing.
My question is, Does the MVP changes with production order goods receipt, If so, what setting should I change to acheive that functionality.
Thanks
Steve

Hi Guys
Thanks for responding
I am aware that sap does not recommend MAP for finished goods. But we have a weird requirement. And I am doing a demo on this. My thought on MAP is, It changes for every goods receipt. But when I am doing goods receipt on production order, It is not changing the MAP, Even though there is variance on production order. So, My question is, Did I miss any configuration ?

Assgn of batch nos. for finished goods

Dear,
GURUS!!!!
I am working on make to order scenario.I am using batch management here.
I am activate the batch management configuration guide.
What is the next process for batch activation ?
Is this system take internal batch no directly.?
What is the process for finished goods batch no?
Please coordinate me .
Thanks with Regards,
Nitin

HI
Kindly check the following link for more information:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/25/2838bf4f7811d18a150000e816ae6e/frameset.htm
thanks

KE380 for finished good with released cost estimate

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for