Keeping table name same in source and target

is it possible to keep the table name the same in source and target (they're on sepearte databases). Seems like OWB wants to rename the output table (usually adds 1 on the end). When I tried to rename I got a message saying that table name exists.

In my mapping.
First I defined a source and a target. The table on the target doesn't exist yet.
I open mapping editor...drag the table from my source. Let's call it TABLE_A. Then I add Table operator to the mapping (choose create unbound operator with no attributes option). For the name I choose TABLE_A...however when I click OK it then changes the name to TABLE_A_1.
So I double click on the table and change the name to TABLE_A and then I get the message that the table already exists.

Similar Messages

  • How to create Same file names for source and target.

    hi
    Can any body send Procedure for below requirement.
    how to create the dynamic file names for a source and save the file with same name in the Target, because it has to identify that which sender had sent the file and the target file should be again sent back to the customer as a link.
    Please help me.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    See the below link
    /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/11/10/xi-the-same-filename-from-a-sender-to-a-receiver-file-adapter--sp14 - sender file name as receiver file name
    Regards
    Chilla

  • Can source and target tables be the same

    Hi there,
    I need to restate profit center column in the delivery fact table. Historical Profit Centers need to be populated since today is the first time we brought in Profit Center field from LIPS table. The source for the delivery fact table is SAP LIPS table. so what I did is:
    joined the LIPS and delivery fact table on (LIPS.delivery number = deliveryfacttable.delivery number & LIPS.delivery line item number = deliveryfacttable.delivery line item number) to get the profit center.
    So the source and the target delivery fact table are the same. Is this a good practice becuase Data services warns me that the source and target tables are the same.
    Please let me know a better alternative approach to this OR a better approach to restate fields for historical data. Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    samqiue

    Arun,
    actually the LIPS resides on another server and in order to fetch data I have to write an R3 ABAP data flow, so I cant use it directly in a lookup.
    Except what Im thinking based on your reply to use a lookup table is: that I will extract 3 colums (delivery number, delivery line item number and profit center) to a table and then use the lookup.
    Thanks.
    Regards,
    samique

  • LMDB - SLD "Source and target system have the same object server name"

    Hi,
    the system is a SM7.1 SP1
    For some reason (Object-Server-Name changed), the job that syncs the sld and lmdb cancels...
    I set the LMDB-Object-Server-Name to its original Name...
    Now i've deleted the sync-config in the solman_setup and try to start a new sync, but i get the following error, when i try to configure the source-system:
    'Source and target system have the same object server name: CISM318'
    But the names are different: 'SM3' (LMDB) and 'CISM318' (SLD)
    Any suggestions ?
    best regards
    Christoph
    Edited by: Christoph Bastian on Aug 26, 2011 9:37 AM
    Edited by: Christoph Bastian on Aug 26, 2011 11:18 AM

    problem solved...
    Apparently the sync needs some hours to finish a object-server-name-change...
    best regards
    Christoph

  • Source and Target Table in the Same schema........will that work in ODI

    Hi ,
    Is it possible to have my source and target tables in the Same achema.......will it have any performance issues or some other issues in our ODI.......
    I would like to know whether it works well or not .........
    ( To my understanding it wont have any issues ......But I am not 100 % sure on my judgement)
    Thanks
    AK

    Yes, you're correct.
    Just be sure about you load strategy, it means, if you need only to insert use the KM Control Append, but if need update too, try the IKM Oracle Incremental Update... I believe that will work better for millions of lines.
    Anyway be sure that your database has the necessary tablespaces to manage huge data volume.

  • Is it possible to have source and target schema in the same DB instance ?

    Hi All,
    I'm using Oracle 11gR1.
    I have switched source locations from other server to the one with OWB.
    During deploy I get VLD-3064 and I can't deploy mapping because of many 'table or view does not exist' warnings.
    Is it possible to have source and target schemas in the same instance ??
    How to do it ?
    Regards,
    Martin

    Hi Jörg,
    Thanks for your help and quick answer.
    I'd like to clarify a little your answer :
    1. Are the any special privilages I need to set ? Currently I have only 'RESOURCE' and 'CONNECT' (I think I didn't have to add any other privs when that schema was located on other instance...)
    2. Also VLD-3064 states that : 'Owning and referenced location of this connector are on the same database instance. Unless explicitly referenced in configuration settings no generated code will use the dataabase link resulting from deployment of this connector'. Does it mean I have to put something in configuration ?
    Thanks,
    Martin

  • Issue in mapping the same source and target fields

    Hi All,
    I am working on PI 7.0 and currently I am connecting to PI 7.0 via citrix desktop . Problem here is : in the mapping , direct mapping option that is available to map the same source and target fields is disabled . I do know that this is due to some java version issue .
    What I want to know is there any possibilty of solving this issue without installing an updated java version ?
    Regards
    Vinay P.

    I've faced the same for many times and all of that were due to Java version.
    1st of all, you have to check the authorizations you have. If you have enough (DEVELOPER_J2EE, CONTENT_ORGANIZER_J2EE, and so), and - obvious but very often forgotten - you have to assure you're trying to change it in the message mapping change mode On.
    Then, last shot should be downgrade your Java version.
    The 1.4.2 JRE version allow you to use not only the Mapp the Identical field but also Dependencies, Clear Mapping and some other tools/buttons. As mentioned above, if there's a fix in the new Java releases, I do not know (hope so) and would appreciate if you could let us know.
    Tks.

  • No mapping for Same structure in source and target

    Hi Experts,
    I want to transfer the source structure to two receivers . Here source and target structures are same so i dont need mapping.
    My question is how many DT,MT and MI required .. mapping required or not.
    Thanks in Advance
    CS

    hi  CS,
                 here in  your  scenario as  u  have  told  that  source  and reciver  are of  same  structure . definitely you didn't need  any  mapping . and you have to create two data type(one for sender and  one for receiver) , two message  types(one for sender and one for receiver)) , and  two message  interfaces(one for sender and one for receiver).
    while creating message types it asks for data  type and while creating message interface it asks for message type only . as the structures of sender and receiver are same then inspite of having two receivers  we  have to create  ony one message interface on sender side . later the adapter will take  care of further proceedings
    but  in  case of configuration you have to import three business systems . one for sender and  two for receiver systems . and  you have to configure the communications  channels  accordingly. as per the receivers accepting the structures you have to use the relevant adaptors .

  • Single Code Page Unicode conversion when source and target are the same

    Hi everyone.  We have recently upgraded our non-unicode 4.7 to ECC6 non-unicode.  Now we have begun researching the next step to convert to Unicode.  I know we could have done the Combined Upgrade and Unicode Conversion but I wanted to do thorough testing after the upgrade to eliminate too many variables if problems arose.
    So, my question is...has anyone done the Unicode conversion when source and target servers are the same?  Most documentation I've seen recommends a system copy to another box first.  I did find one forum thread that gave a high level approach to doing the conversion with just one server and listed this:
    Step 1:- Run Tcode SPUMG to scan
    Step 2:- Export Database
    Step 3:- Drop Database
    Step 4:- Create New Database
    Step 5:- Import database
    Step 6:- Chnage unicode Kernel
    What are your thoughts?  Is it supported?  Am I wasting my time and should I just bite the bullet and buy yet another system?  Thanks in advance.
    -Anthony

    Theoretically that's possible, yes. However...
    > Step 5:- Import database
    > Step 6:- Chnage unicode Kernel
    the import must be done using the Unicode kernel.
    So basically you can
    - export the old systm
    - uninstall system + database
    - start as if you were installing "from scratch" on a new box
    Markus

  • Control center location source and targets

    Hi,
    I'm trying to document an OWB 11.2 repository and I'm trying to find a OWBSYS view that holds the assigned source and target locations for a control center in the design repository (what you see in the control center properties in the Locations tab) . Does anyone know where I can query this information?
    Cheers,
    John

    Perhaps the table is repurposed between 10g and 11.2?
    When I query that table I see a list of modules (information_system_name) and it's associated location (location_name) but I do not know if the location is a source or a target. A lot of these tables have been around since 9i so I guess in 9i speak I want to see the equivalent of the module type ('data source' or 'warehouse target').
    In 11.2 the module no longer has this source or target concept directly via the module properties - it held against the control center properties - not that all_iv_control_centers shows this information - that is just a list of control center names and their associated remote server/workspace/workspace owner properties - which is similar to the old 9i runtime repository connection properties when using the deployment manager and pretty much the same as what you see when querying all_iv_runtime_repositories.
    So, still not quite there yet...
    Cheers,
    John

  • The source and target structure have a different number of fields

    Hi,
    I am new to workflow and I am trying to create an attachment in Workflow (SAP ECC 6.0) and pass it through to a User Decision (User Decision works fine) however the workflow is failing on the attachment step with u2018The source and target structure have a different number of fieldsu2019. The bindings check ok. Please see details below.
    I have used document u2018Creating Attachments to Work Items or to User Decisions in Workflowsu2019 by Ramakanth Reddy for guidance. Thanks in advance.
    1) Workflow containers (SWDD)
    WORKITEMID (import)
    ZSWR_ATT_ID (export)
    SOFM (export)
    2) Task Container (PFTC)
    1 Import parameter defined u2013 WORKITEMID (swr_struct-workitemid)
    2 Export parameters defined
    - SOFM (Ref. obj. type SOFM)
    - ZSWR_ATT_ID  (swr_att_id-doc_id)
    Binding task -> Method
    Binding for 1 parameter (import) defined
    Task <- Method
    Binding for 2 parameters (export) defined
    3) Z  BOR object created with a Method, Method Parameters and Event (SWO1)
    1 import parameter defined
    2 export parameters defined
    Method calls FM SSF_FUNCTION_MODULE_NAME, CONVERT_OTF, SCMS_XSTRING_TO_BINARY and SAP_WAPI_ATTACHMENT_ADD
    Workflow is triggered by FM SAP_WAPI_CREATE_EVENT, Return_code = 0
    Event_id = 00000000000000000001
    Test results
    A) Triggered by ABAP/ FM SAP_WAPI_CREATE_EVENT - SWI2_DIAG results
    Work item  14791: object <z bor object name> method <method name> cannot be executed. The source and target structure have a different number of fields (this message is repeated 3 times). Error handling for work item 14791. No errors occurred -> details in long text (message is repeated 3 times).
    Message no. WL821, OL383, WL050 in long text
    B) Z BOR Test method <execute>
    Enter workitem id.
    Runtime error - Data objects in Unicode programs cannot be converted. The statement "MOVE src TO dst" requires that the operands "dst" and "src" are convertible. Since this statement is in a Unicode program, the special conversion rules for Unicode programs apply.                                        
    In this case, these rules were violated.   
    Program                             SAPLSWCD                
    Include                                LSWCDF00                
    Row                                    475                     
    Module type                        (FORM)                  
    Module Name                      MOVE_CONTAINER_TO_VALUE           
    C) Z BOR Test method <debugging>
    Enter workitem id.
    SAP_WAPI_ATTACHMENT_ADD, return_code = 0, message_lines  = Attachment created            
    both  swc_set_element container work ok
    Runtime error occurs after end_method executed. Data objects in Unicode programs cannot be converted.
    D) Workflow test
    Enter workitem id <execute>
    Task started> Workflow log> Status = Error
    Workflow errors in Attachment step (however Office document can be viewed in details for step).

    Problem has now been resolved. Problem was related to use of swr_att_id structure and swc_set_element statement in BOR program - problem resolved by only setting w/f container to swr_att_id-doc_id.

  • Why can't I tell Siri "No" to stop dialing a wrong number? It's embarrassing to keep telling the same people over and over that I mistakenly dialed their number. Even if I yell "stop" or "no" it keeps dialing. Very frustrating.

    Why can't I tell Siri "No" to stop dialing a wrong number? It's embarrassing to keep telling the same people over and over that I mistakenly dialed their number. Even if I yell "stop" or "no" it keeps dialing. Very frustrating. Even very simple names. And I talk on the phone for a living. Which is why I need to use Siri to save me time. I speak very clearly. Because of this problem, I've had to even add special code letters before people's names to increase the chances of Siri getting it right, which is only about 70% of the time.

    That is not a feature of Siri. Submit your feedback requesting such a feature directly to Apple using the appropriate link on the Feedback page:
    http://www.apple.com/feedback
    Note that yelling at the phone does not improve the chances that Siri will understand you.

  • Can we pass IT table name dynamically to READ and SORT stmt

    Hello All,
      i have a requirement in which i am passing table name using a variable and want to read the same table: so my question is can we execute read and sort stmt with dynamic IT name. please see below for explaination.
    v_itname = <it_2>.
    now read using variable
    READ table ( v_itname ) with key <field>.
    and
    SORT ( v_itname ) by (otab).
    thanks
    Mani

    Hi ,
    This can be done. Please refer to the  codes below. Please note that the code will work if the itabs are of type standard table else it may dump.
    You just need to replace the variables form the values from your internal table.
    DATA: v_table1(10) TYPE c VALUE 'I_MARA',
          v_field(10)  TYPE c VALUE 'MATNR',
          i_mara TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF mara.
    FIELD-SYMBOLS : <fs_tab>   TYPE STANDARD TABLE,
                    <fs_field> TYPE ANY.
    DATA: otab TYPE abap_sortorder_tab,
    oline TYPE abap_sortorder.
    SELECT * UP TO 10 ROWS
      FROM  mara
      INTO TABLE i_mara.
    IF sy-subrc = 0.
      ASSIGN (v_table1) TO <fs_tab>.
      IF sy-subrc = 0.
        oline-name = v_field.
        APPEND oline TO otab.
        SORT <fs_tab> BY (otab).
        READ TABLE <fs_tab>
        WITH KEY (v_field) = '000000000020000989' "
        BINARY SEARCH
        TRANSPORTING NO FIELDS.
        IF sy-subrc = 0.
        ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
    Regards,
    Dev.

  • Master Data ------  Source and Target Mapping

    I want to know the source and target mapping of some master data elements like plant,vendor,customer,workcenter.
    Where can I get it. Please provide the relevant documents or links.

    Hi,
    Check in RSOSFIELDMAP table.
    Thanks
    Reddy

  • OWB 10g -- Can't Create Database Links for Data Source and Target

    We installed OWB 10g server components on a Unix box running Oracle 10g (R2) database. The Designer Repository is in one instance. The Runtime Repository and the Target are in another instance. The OWB client component was installed on Windows XP. We create a data source module and a target module in OWB. The data source is on another Unix box running Oracle 9i (R2) database. We try to create database links for data source module and target module, respective. But when we created and tested the DB links, the DB links were failed.
    For the database link of data source, we got the following error message:
    Testing...
    Failed.
    SQL Exception
    Repository Error:SQL Exception..
    Class Name: CacheMediator.
    Method Name: getDDEntryFromDB.
    Repository Error Message: ORA-12170: TNS:Connect timeout occurred
    For the database link of target , we got the following error message:
    Testing...
    Failed.
    API2215: Cannot create database link. Please contact Oracle Support with the stack trace and the details on how to reproduce it.
    Repository Error:SQL Exception..
    Class Name: oracle.wh.ui.integrator.common.RepositoryUtils.
    Method Name: createDBLink(String, String, String, String).
    Method Name: -1.
    Repository Error Message: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended.
    However, we could connect to the two databases (data source and target) using the OWB’s utility SQL Plus.
    Please help us to solve this problem. Thank you.

    As I said prior the database link creation should work from within the OWB client (also in 10).
    Regarding your issue when deploying, have you registered your target locations in the deployment manager and did you first deployed your target location's connector which points out to your source?
    I myself had some problems with database link creations in the past and I can't remember exactly what they were but it had something to do with
    - the use of abnormal characters in the database link name
    - long domain name used in as names.default_domain in my sqlnet.ora file
    What you can do is check the actual script created when deploying the database link so see if there's something strange and check if executing the created script manually works or not.

Maybe you are looking for